Чуждоезиково обучение
Вход / Регистрация

https://doi.org/10.53656/for2025-05-07

2025/5, стр. 624 - 633

TRAINING FUTURE TEACHERS IN ASSESSMENT SKILLS WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF LINGUODIDACTIC THEORY

Arapbek Aitzhanov
E-mail: arapbek_86-86@mail.ru
Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University
Almaty Kazakhstan
Dimitar Vesselinov
E-mail: D_vesselinov@yahoo.fr
Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”
Sofia Bulgaria

Резюме: This article examines the formation of future teachers’ assessment skills based on the principles of linguodidactic theory. The study emphasizes that assessment skills are not only a tool for measuring learning outcomes but also a pedagogical mechanism that fosters students’ motivation, supports their personal development, and enhances reflective learning. A literature review of Kazakh, Bulgarian, and Western scholars highlights the multidimensional and developmental nature of assessment. The research identifies several challenges, including the gap between theory and practice, limited use of innovative technologies, and insufficient development of future teachers’ reflective culture. The article proposes solutions to these issues and substantiates the importance of improving assessment competence as a key component of professional teacher training.

Ключови думи: Linguodidactology; assessment skills; future teachers; professional training; criteria-based assessment; competence; reflection; innovative technologies

Introduction

In the modern education system, one of the key conditions for improving the quality of teaching is the fair and developmental assessment of students’ academic achievements. The assessment process is not limited to measuring learning outcomes; it is a complex pedagogical activity that directly influences students’ learning motivation, self-regulation, reflective abilities, and personal development. Therefore, the formation of assessment skills in the professional training of future teachers holds special significance.

Today, in the global educational space, assessment competence is considered an essential component of the competence-based paradigm of education. In particular, the criteria-based assessment system introduced in Kazakhstan since 2016 requires teachers to possess a high methodological culture, to apply assessment tools effectively, and to be able to identify students’ individual learning trajectories. This highlights the need to raise the professional preparation of future teachers to a new level.

In this regard, linguodidactic theory plays an especially important role. It views the learner not only as a recipient of linguistic knowledge but also as an individual capable of reflection and conscious participation in the learning process. Bulgarian scholar D. Veselinov, in his works, emphasized the place of assessment within linguodidactics, considering it as a tool that supports and develops the learner’s educational activity. This perspective is fully aligned with modern pedagogical practice.

Nevertheless, certain contradictions are observed in the process of forming assessment skills in future teachers. These include the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application, the insufficient use of assessment tools, the limited integration of innovative technologies, and the underdevelopment of reflective culture. Such challenges lower the quality of professional training and hinder teachers from performing assessment effectively.

Linguodidactics, as a science, is aimed at developing linguistic, cognitive, and communicative competences within the educational process. In his research (on linguodidactics, dialogic pedagogy, lexicography, and innovations in language teaching), D. Veselinov explored the interrelation between teaching and assessment, highlighting both linguistic and intercultural dimensions. His theoretical views emphasize the need to educate learners not merely as users of linguistic tools but also as reflective individuals capable of evaluating their own results.

The linguodidactic approaches proposed by Veselinov promote active learner participation, dialogic interaction, and the development of self-assessment skills. These ideas are highly relevant in forming assessment competence in future teachers, since the modern system of evaluation (criteria-based, formative, and summative assessment) demands not only methodological literacy but also communicative and reflective culture.

Moreover, the criteria-based assessment model implemented in Kazakhstan resonates strongly with linguodidactic theory. Criteria help students understand learning objectives, evaluate their own work, and identify their developmental trajectory. In this sense, Veselinov’s notion that “teaching is the formation of personality through language” finds direct application in assessment practices as well.

Thus, relying on linguodidactic theory in preparing future teachers for assessment activities is of great importance both scientifically and practically. This approach not only strengthens teachers’ professional competence but also ensures fair and developmental evaluation of learners’ achievements. Therefore, the relevance of the proposed article lies in identifying ways to enhance future teachers’ assessment competence based on D. Veselinov’s linguodidactic theory. The study brings innovation to pedagogical science and makes a practical contribution to improving teachers’ professional training within the modern education system.

Linguodidactics, as a distinct branch of pedagogical science, studies the methodology of language teaching, its theoretical foundations, and practical applications. The main objective of this science is to orient the teaching process towards the learner, to develop linguistic competence, and to promote active engagement of students in the learning process. In linguodidactics, assessment is not only regarded as a tool for determining the level of linguistic knowledge but also as a means of fostering students’ cognitive and communicative abilities. In this regard, assessment skills are closely linked to linguodidactic theory, since determining progress in language learning directly affects learners’ reflection, selfcontrol, and motivation.

From the linguodidactic perspective, assessment is not treated as a traditional “summative” tool but as an integral part of the educational process. Bulgarian scholar D. Veselinov, in his works, emphasized the necessity of considering the methodological system of language teaching in close relation to assessment practices. According to him, the assessment system should not only increase students’cognitive activity but also take into account their individual characteristics, thereby fostering personal development (Veselinov 2016).

These ideas are fully consistent with today’s concept of criteria-based assessment, where assessment ensures fairness and transparency by relying on explicit criteria and descriptors.

Assessment skills have also been widely studied in pedagogical research. For example, Yu.K. Babansky, V.A. Slastenin, and N.V. Kuzmina interpret assessment as an indicator of the teacher’s professional competence [8Весе]. The teacher’s ability to assess students’ achievements fairly, provide feedback, and encourage them is considered evidence of methodological and personal readiness. These conclusions are also consistent with linguodidactic theory, as assessment in language learning serves to enhance learners’ motivation and stimulates the acquisition of new knowledge (Leontiev 1977).

In Western research, assessment is typically divided into formative and summative (Bloom 1956; Black & Wiliam 1998; Scriven 1967). Formative assessment is carried out throughout the learning process, while summative assessment reflects the results at the end of a given period [13]. In linguodidactic theory, both approaches play an important role, as continuous monitoring of language learners’ achievements helps to gradually develop their speaking, listening, writing, and reading skills. In particular, Veselinov’s concept of dialogic pedagogy is closely related to formative assessment, since dialogue enables real-time interaction between teacher and student, allowing immediate feedback (Vesselinov & Deleva 2024).

Kazakh pedagogical scholars (A.E. Abilkasimova, M.M. Zhanpeisova, K.Zh. Kudaibergenova) have also extensively discussed new competency-based models of assessment. They highlight the importance of criteria-based assessment in identifying students’ individual learning trajectories. These conclusions are consistent with Veselinov’s linguodidactic ideas, as he also viewed teaching as a learner-centered process. Thus, the review of literature demonstrates that assessment skills occupy a central place in linguodidactic theory and play a decisive role in preparing future teachers for professional practice.

Based on the above-mentioned literature, the link between linguodidactic theory and assessment skills becomes evident. Linguodidactics regards the main goal of teaching not only as the development of linguistic competence but also as the cultivation of assessment skills that regulate learning activity, enable self-control, and help determine the learner’s personal trajectory. This perspective confirms the developmental function of assessment in pedagogical science. Assessment is not merely a tool for measuring outcomes but also a means of enhancing learners’ linguistic practice, cognitive abilities, and communicative skills. Hence, in linguodidactic theory, assessment is described not as a final stage of the learning process but as a continuous process that promotes students’ educational and cognitive activity.

In this context, the significance of the linguodidactic approach in preparing future teachers to assess students’ academic achievements becomes clear. As Veselinov emphasized, teaching can achieve effective results only when it is dialogical and reflective in nature, and such a process requires high-level assessment competence from teachers. That is, future teachers must not only design assessment criteria and define descriptors but also be able to use assessment results in ways that contribute to students’ personal development. This represents the practical application of theoretical ideas in linguodidactics. Therefore, the integration of linguodidactic theory and assessment skills plays a crucial role in professional teacher training, forming the scientific and methodological foundation for building teachers’ professional competence.

Kazakh pedagogical scholars also regard assessment skills as one of the key issues in a competency-based education system. Abilkasimova (2014) emphasizes that assessing students’ academic achievements enhances their motivation and promotes self-development Zhanpeisova (2008). M.M. Zhanpeisova demonstrates the unique features of criteria-based assessment, showing how it enables students to evaluate their own work against clear criteria [6]. Meanwhile, Kudaibergenova (2012) highlights assessment skills as a core indicator of teachers’ professional competence and stresses the importance of preparing future teachers for fair and effective evaluation of students’ achievements (Slastenin 2002). The works of these scholars have significantly contributed to forming the theoretical and methodological basis of the criteria-based assessment system introduced in Kazakhstan since 2016.

In the Bulgarian linguodidactic school, assessment is viewed in close connection with language teaching and pedagogical practice. Dimitar Veselinov (2016), in his works, explains assessment as an integral part of the teaching process that fosters reflection and self-control in students. He considers dialogic teaching an effective tool of assessment, as dialogue allows learners to demonstrate communicative abilities and thereby provides an accurate basis for evaluating their achievements. Moreover, Bulgarian scholars describe assessment as an inseparable element of learner-centered education, where the teacher is not only an evaluator but also a facilitator and guide of the student’s developmental process.

In Western educational research, assessment theory and practice have been studied extensively. Bloom (1956) connected assessment skills with levels of knowledge acquisition through his taxonomy of educational objectives. Black and Wiliam (1998) developed the theoretical foundations of formative assessment, identifying it as a decisive factor in improving learning quality. M. Scriven introduced the concept of summative assessment, providing the methodological foundation for evaluating learning outcomes. These scholars’ works reveal that assessment is not only a tool for control and measurement but also a powerful mechanism for determining learners’ individual developmental trajectories and enhancing the teaching process.

By comparing the works of Kazakh, Bulgarian, and Western scholars, the multifaceted nature of assessment skills becomes evident. Kazakh researchers analyze assessment within the context of national education reforms, offering competency-based innovations; Bulgarian scholars highlight the dialogical, personal, and intercultural aspects of assessment from a linguodidactic perspective; while Western scholars conceptualize assessment as a structural element of pedagogy, introducing formative and summative frameworks. The intersection of these approaches demonstrates that assessment skills are a universal pedagogical phenomenon: they not only determine students’ academic performance but also support their development, motivation, and self-awareness.

Although linguodidactic theory provides a solid scientific and methodological foundation for developing assessment skills in future teachers, several challenges arise in its practical implementation. One of the key issues is the gap between theory and practice. While university students acquire theoretical knowledge of assessment, they often lack sufficient methodological support when applying it in real school settings. This limits the full development of teachers’ assessment competence.

Figure 1. Indicators of the gap between theory and practice

The second issue concerns the multifaceted and complex nature of the assessment process. From a linguodidactic perspective, assessment involves not only testing linguistic knowledge but also evaluating communicative abilities, intercultural competence, and reflection. However, current curricula do not devote enough attention to these aspects. As a result, future teachers often resort to traditional methods and face difficulties in assessing students’ holistic development.

The third problem is the insufficient use of innovative technologies in developing assessment skills. Linguodidactics recommends integrating digital tools, interactive platforms, e-portfolios, and self-assessment systems into the assessment process. Yet, in many higher education institutions, these opportunities remain underutilized. This limits future teachers’ ability to apply modern approaches to assessment and reduces the overall quality of their professional training.

Figure 2. Share of the use of assessment tools and technologies

The fourth challenge is the underdevelopment of self-reflection among future teachers. Linguodidactic theory places special emphasis on the reflective nature of assessment, highlighting that teachers must analyze their own practice and use assessment results for professional growth. However, many students lack experience in professional self-analysis, which hinders their ability to apply assessment skills effectively and to ensure fair, developmental evaluation of learners’ achievements.

To address these issues, several measures are necessary. First, the gap between theory and practice must be reduced. This requires universities to complement theoretical courses with practical training sessions and model lessons that simulate real school contexts. Training future teachers to apply assessment systems in authentic school environments will enhance their professional competence. Additionally, pedagogical practice should include specific assessment-related tasks, enabling students to practice applying criteria-based assessment, formative feedback, and self-assessment in real classroom situations. Such measures will provide future teachers with practical mastery of assessment activities.

The second solution is to develop the assessment system in a multidimensional and integrative manner. Assessment should not be confined to measuring knowledge but should also encompass communicative, social, and intercultural competences. For this purpose, higher education institutions should train future teachers to use a variety of assessment tools such as rubrics, portfolios, project-based assessment, and dialogic assessment. Moreover, systematic use of digital assessment technologies (Google Classroom, Moodle, Kahoot, and other platforms) can elevate assessment practices to an innovative level. Such approaches will not only broaden students’ assessment skills but also align their professional training with modern educational requirements.

The third priority is to foster the reflective culture of future teachers. Reflection plays a crucial role in assessment, since teachers must evaluate not only their students but also their own professional practice. To achieve this, universities should integrate tasks aimed at self-analysis, professional portfolio development, group discussions, and peer-learning activities into teacher training programs. Keeping reflective journals can also help students develop habits of self-assessment. Such practices will strengthen their assessment skills and enable them to evaluate learners’ academic achievements fairly and developmentally.

Figure 3. Three-way solution model for improving assessment skills

The analysis demonstrates that the development of assessment skills among future teachers requires a systematic integration of theory, methodology, and practice. The research reveals that while the theoretical basis of assessment is well established in teacher education, its practical application remains limited. Addressing this gap demands innovative, practice-oriented training supported by digital technologies and reflective methods.

Furthermore, the comparative insights from Kazakh, Bulgarian, and Western scholarship confirm that assessment is not merely a technical process but a complex pedagogical phenomenon that shapes both learning outcomes and professional growth. Strengthening reflective culture and promoting the multidimensional use of assessment tools can foster teachers’ professional competence, ensuring that assessment becomes a driving force for educational development rather than a mere evaluative mechanism.

Conclusion

Overall, linguodidactic theory serves as a valuable scientific and practical foundation for the development of assessment skills in future teachers. The analysis of the literature revealed that assessment skills are not merely a tool for measuring learning outcomes, but rather a complex pedagogical activity that ensures students’ personal development, motivation, and reflection. The works of Kazakh, Bulgarian, and Western scholars highlight the multifaceted nature of this issue and demonstrate the importance of fairness, transparency, and developmental principles in modern assessment systems.

However, the research also identified several challenges: the gap between theory and practice, the reliance of assessment systems on traditional measures, the insufficient use of innovative technologies, and the underdeveloped reflective culture of future teachers. These obstacles limit the full formation of professional competence among future educators.

To address these challenges, it is recommended that higher education curricula incorporate practical training in assessment, diversify approaches to assessment methods, expand the use of digital tools, and systematically develop students’ reflective skills. Such measures will enhance the professional preparation of future teachers and enable them to evaluate students’ academic achievements fairly and in a developmental manner.

In conclusion, developing future teachers’ assessment skills on the basis of linguodidactic theory is one of the key strategic priorities of today’s education system. This approach not only improves the quality of national education but also ensures the preparation of competent and competitive teachers who meet international standards.

REFERENCES

ABILKASIMOVA, A. E., 2014. The system of criteria-based assessment of students’ learning achievements: Theory and practice. Almaty: Kazakh University.

BABANSKY, Yu. K., 1982. Optimization of the learning process. Moscow: Pedagogika [in Russian].

BLACK, P. & WILIAM, D., 1998. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 7 – 74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

BLOOM, B. S., 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.

GALPERIN, P. Ya., 1985. Teaching methods and the child’s mental development. Moscow: Moscow State University Press [in Russian].

KUDAIBERGENOVA, K. Zh., 2012. The role of the assessment system in developing students’ competence. Almaty: Kazakh University [in Russian].

LEONTIEV, A. N., 1977. Activity. Consciousness. Personality. Moscow: Politizdat [in Russian].

SCRIVEN, M., 1967. The methodology of evaluation. In: TYLER, R. W.; GAGNÉ, R. M. & SCRIVEN, M. (eds.). Perspectives of curriculum evaluation, pp. 39 – 83. Chicago: Rand McNally.

SLASTENIN, V. A., 2002. Pedagogy. Moscow: Akademiya [in Russian].

VESSELINOV, D., 2016. Theoretical basis of “Dictionary of the French Words in Bulgarian Language.” Foreign Language Teaching, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 250 – 271.

VESSELINOV, D. & DELEVA, N., 2024. In memory of Yuri Derenikovich Apresyan (1930–2024). Foreign Language Teaching, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 399 – 405.

VYGOTSKY, L. S., 1984. Collected works. Vol. 4: Child psychology. Moscow: Pedagogika [in Russian].

ZHANPEISOVA, M. M., 2008. Modular teaching technology as a means of student development. Almaty: Rawan [in Russian].

2025 година
Книжка 6
УПОТРЕБИ НА АОРИСТА ВМЕСТО ИМПЕРФЕКТА В СЪВРЕМЕННИЯ БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕЗИК В ЛИНГВОДИДАКТОЛОГИЧЕН АСПЕКТ

Красимира Алексова, Ласка Ласкова, Данка Апостолова, Яна Сивилова, Михаела Москова

Книжка 5
МОПАСАН КАТО ПРЕДМОДЕРНИСТ?

Светла Черпокова

Книжка 4
СИНКРЕТИЗЪМ И МОДАЛНОСТ

Мариана Георгиева

„IMPATIENT WOMEN“ OR THE FUTURE OF THE VALUES / VALUES OF THE FUTURE

Magdalena Kostova-Panayotova, Madeleine Danova

В ИРОНИЧНОТО „ЦАРСТВО“ НА МУЗИЛ

Соня Александрова-Колева

Книжка 3
ЗА УПОТРЕБАТА НА ПАСИВНИ ФОРМИ В ПОЛИТИЧЕСКАТА РЕЧ

Борислав Петров, Биляна Михайлова

ТЕРМИНОЛОГИЯТА В ПЛУВАНЕТО

Биляна Рангелова

ПРЕВОДИТЕ НА Д-Р ЛОНГ НА ХУДОЖЕСТВЕНА ЛИТЕРАТУРА

Мария Пилева, Елена Крейчова, Надежда Сталянова

Книжка 2
ВЪЛШЕБСТВО И ИНТЕРПРЕТАЦИЯ

Соня Александрова

Книжка 1
ЗАМЯНАТА НА ИМПЕРФЕКТНОТО ОТ АОРИСТНОТО ПРИЧАСТИЕ В СЪВРЕМЕННИЯ БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕЗИК В ЛИНГВОДИДАКТОЛОГИЧЕН АСПЕКТ

Красимира Алексова, Ласка Ласкова, Данка Апостолова, Яна Сивилова, Михаела Москова

ГЕЙМИФИКАЦИЯТА И УСВОЯВАНЕТО НА ЧУЖД ЕЗИК

Гергана Фъркова, Гергана Боянова, Ани Колева, Зорница Лъчезарова, Венче Младенова

НОВАЯ МОНОГРАФИЯ ПО РУССКОМУ ЯЗЫКОЗНАНИЮ

Михаил Викторович Первушин

2024 година
Книжка 6
ПРОСТРАНСТВЕНИТЕ ИЗМЕРЕНИЯ НА ИЗМЕНЕНИЕТО НА КЛИМАТА И ГЛОБАЛНОТО ЕЗИКОВО РАЗНООБРАЗИЕ

Климент Найденов, Методи Иванов, Антонина Атанасова, Димитър Атанасов, Александър Пейчев

СИРМА ДАНОВА (12.11.1984 – 22.10.2023)

Владимир Сабоурин

СИЛАТА НА ПОСТИСТИНАТА

Владимир Градев

Книжка 5
В ПАМЕТ НА АЛЕКСАНДЪР ИВАНОВ (1953 – 2023)

Надежда Делева, Димитър Веселинов

Книжка 4
A NOTE ON THE LANGUAGE COMPONENTS OF APHASIA

Kostadin Chompalov, Dobrinka Georgieva

ПАМЯТИ ЮРИЯ ДЕРЕНИКОВИЧА АПРЕСЯНА (1930 – 2024)

Димитър Веселинов, Надя Делева

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
РЕПЕРТОРИУМ НА СРЕДНОВЕКОВНИ ЮЖНОСЛАВЯНСКИ РЪКОПИСИ И КОПИСТИ В НАУЧНОИЗСЛЕДОВАТЕЛСКИ КОНТЕКСТ

Детелин Лучев, Максим Гойнов, Десислава Панева-Маринова, Радослав Павлов, Константин Рангочев

ПРОФ. Д-Р БОГДАН МИРЧЕВ НА 80 ГОДИНИ

Ренета Килева-Стаменова, Ева Пацовска-Иванова

КРЪГОВРАТ НА ИЗКУСТВАТА

Ирена Кръстева

2023 година
Книжка 6
ГРАМАТИКА И КОГНИЦИЯ

Мариана Георгиева

БЪЛГАРИСТИКАТА В САМАРА

Димитър Веселинов

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
IMPACT OF INTERNET RESOURCES USED BY KAZAKHSTAN AND KYRGYZSTAN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS FOR ENGLISH LEARNING

Sagimbayeva Jannat Elemesovna, 1;, Tazhitova Gulzhakhan Zarubaevna, 1;, Mukhtarkhanova Ainagul Madievna, 1;, Duvanaeva Karachach Toktomamotovna, 2;, Kurmanayeva Dina Kassimbekovna

Книжка 3
НИЕ СМЕ ТЕЗИ, КОИТО СМЕ

Милена Кирова

Книжка 2
SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION AND SOME OF ITS ASPECTS

Nadezhda Stalyanova, Elena Krejcova

LES MOTS POUR RIRE

Bilyana Mihaylova

BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR CHARACTERISTICS OF THE KOREAN LANGUAGE E-TEXTBOOK

Lyudmila A. Voronina, Sergey A. Letun, Evgenia Rozenfeld

Книжка 1
2022 година
Книжка 6
SOCIOLINGUISTIC CREDO OF A FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHER: THE CASE OF DIGITAL CLASSROOM

Ekaterina A. Savkina, Elena G. Tareva, Dimitrina Lesnevskaya

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
„АНДРЕ МАЛРО – ПИСАТЕЛ И БОРБЕН ИНТЕЛЕКТУАЛЕЦ“ – ПРАЗНИК НА ДУХА

Соня Александрова-Колева, Мая Тименова-Коен

Книжка 3
РАЗРАБОТКА ОПРОСНИКА ДЛЯ ИЗУЧЕНИИ ЯЗЫКОВЫХ БИОГРАФИЙ НОСИТЕЛЕЙ УНАСЛЕДОВАННОГО ЯЗЫКА

Леонид Московкин, Бернгард Бремер, Татьяна Курбангулова, Татьяна Лыпкань

Книжка 2
АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ТЕМЫ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ В СОПОСТАВИТЕЛЬНОЙ ФИЛОЛОГИИ В СОВРЕМЕННОМ КАЗАХСТАНЕ

Молдир Алшынбаева, Дарина Аманбекова, Мерей Балабекова

Книжка 1
КЪМ НОВИ ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВА

Човешкият фактор е в основата на обучител- ния процес. Това показват изминалите в пан- демична среда няколко години. Информацион- но-комуникационните технологии се оказаха в центъра на образователните промени и влязоха в ролята на панацея за решаване на кризисните моменти във всички аспекти на обучението. Но не можаха да изпълнят ролята на пълноценна алтернатива на „живите“ срещи в учебната ау- дитория. Вълната от оптимизъм и очаквания вече премина своя пик сред преподавате

РЕЧЕВОЕ РАЗВИТИЕ ПОДРОСТКОВ 10 – 12 ЛЕТ И ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕ ЭЛЕКТРОННЫХ УСТРОЙСТВ

Безруких, Марьяна Михайловна, Логинова, Екатерина Сергеевна, Теребова, Надежда Николаевна, Усцова, Александра Григорьевна, Макарова, Людмила Викторовна

КУЛЬТУРНАЯ ПАМЯТЬ И ПРЕЦЕДЕНТНЫЕ ФЕНОМЕНЫ

Валерий Ефремов, Валентина Черняк, Надя Чернева

2021 година
Книжка 6
КАКВО Е КУРОРТ?

Иля Златанов

ДЕКОНСТРУИРУЯ ФЕЙКИ

Татьяна Цвигун, Алексей Черняков

Книжка 5
ОВАКАНТЯВАНЕТО НА КАНОНА

Цветан Ракьовски

ПРАВО, ПРАВОПИС И ПРАВОГОВОР

Маргарита Гергинова

Книжка 4
Книжка 3
LA DIDACTIQUE DU FLE À LA CROISÉE DES SCIENCES COGNITIVES ET DISCURSIVES

Elena G. Tareva, Elena Porshneva, Indira Abdulmianova

Книжка 2
ЕЗИК, ВЛАСТ, МЕДИЯ

Мариана Георгиева

Книжка 1
ЛИНГВОДИДАКТОЛОГИЧНИ АСПЕКТИ НА ПРИСЪСТВЕНОТО ОБУЧЕНИЕ В ЕЛЕКТРОННА СРЕДА

Предизвикателствата пред съвременната лингводидактология през новата 2021 г. без съм- нение са свързани с необичайната обстановка, в която се озова световната образователна система под въздействието на неочакваната епидемична ситуация. Пандемичната вълна предизвика по- врат в хода на естественото развитие на лингво- дидактологичните изследвания. Информацион- но-комуникационните технологии се оказаха в центъра на образователните промени и логично се превърнаха в търсената панац

2020 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ЮРИЙ ЛОТМАН КАК ОБЪЕКТ И МЕТАЯЗЫК

Татьяна Цвигун, Алексей Черняков

К ВОПРОСУ О ПРИЗНАКАХ КВАЗИСИМВОЛА

Григорий Токарев, Надя Чернева

Книжка 4
ЦИФРОВЫЕ СРЕДСТВА В ОБУЧЕНИИ ИНОСТРАННЫМ ЯЗЫКАМ: ОТБОР И ТИПОЛОГИЗАЦИЯ

Бартош Дана, Гальскова Наталья, Харламова Мария, Стоянова Елена

Книжка 3
СИНТАКСИС НА МЕТАЕЗИКА

Мариана Георгиева

BURNOUT LEVELS OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHERS

Suzan Kavanoz, Yasemin Kırkgöz

КЪМ ИСТОРИЯТА НА ПРЕДЛОГА ОСВЕН

Марияна Цибранска-Костова

Книжка 2
A SEMANTIC DESCRIPTION OF THE COMBINABILITY BETWEEN VERBS AND NOUNS (ON MATERIAL FROM BULGARIAN AND ENGLISH)

Svetlozara Leseva, Ivelina Stoyanova, Maria Todorova, Hristina Kukova

В ПАМЕТ НА ДОЦ. Д-Р ЙОРДАНКА СИМЕОНОВА 28.08.1946 – 25.07.2018

Павлинка Стефанова, Димитър Веселинов

Книжка 1
НОВИ ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВА ПРЕД СЪВРЕМЕННАТА ЛИНГВОДИДАКТОЛОГИЯ

Третото десетилетие на ХХІ век поставя пред лингводидактологията нови предизвикателства. Утвърденото във времето историко-теоретико- практическо разглеждане на тази наука като из- следователско направление, обединяващо всички аспекти на езиковото образование, продължава да поставя във фокус проблема с оптимизиране на акционалността в условията на глобализира- щия се свят. Интерактивността между участни- ците в образователния процес по чужд език из- исква ново преосмисляне на ролит

СИНТАКТИЧНО ОТНОШЕНИЕ

Мариана Георгиева

АКАДЕМИК ЮРИЙ ДЕРЕНИКОВИЧ АПРЕСЯН НА 90 ГОДИНИ

Димитър Веселинов, Надя Делева

2019 година
Книжка 6
TOWARDS CONCEPTUAL FRAMES

Svetla Koeva, Tsvetana Dimitrova, Valentina Stefanova, Dimitar Hristov

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКАЯ ИННОВАТИКА В ДЕЙСТВИИ

Галина Шамонина, Леонид Московкин

Книжка 3
НАУЧНОЕ НАСЛЕДИЕ ЗОЛОТОГО ВЕКА ИСЛАМА

Сулейменов И.Э., Молдажанова А.А., Копишев Э.Е., Егембердиева З.М., Ниязова Г.Б.

Книжка 2
КОГНИЦИЯ И ПУНКТУАЦИЯ

Мариана Георгиева

КРЪГЛА МАСА „ЕЗИК И ПРЕВОД“

Маргарита Гергинова

Книжка 1
ИЗСЛЕДОВАТЕЛСКИ АСПЕКТИ НА СЪВРЕМЕННАТА ЛИНГВОДИДАКТОЛОГИЯ

Списанието „Чуждоезиково обучение“ е един епистемолого-културологичен монумент на лингводидактологията, която постоянно търси и обновява своя изследователски профил, за да го подложи на опита на времето, преди да се пре- върне в класика. Списанието е барометър на бъл- гарската методическа наука, фиксиращ нейните творчески търсения през годините, проектиращ нови визии и поставящ теоретико-практически ориентири. Текстовете на публикуваните ста- тии са елементи от историята

2018 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
PUBLIC AWARENESS OF DYSLEXIA IN BALKAN COUNTRIES

Mirela Duranović, Dobrinka Georgieva, Mirjana Lenček, Tatjana Novović, Muljaim Kačka

Книжка 4
СЕМАНТИЧНИ РЕЛАЦИИ В РАМКИТЕ НА МНОГОКРАТНАTA ХИПЕРОНИМИЯ В УЪРДНЕТ

Светла Коева, Валентина Стефанова, Димитър Христов

МИФЫ О РУССКОМ ЯЗЫКЕ: ON-LINE

Валерий Ефремов

Книжка 3
БЪЛГАРСКИЯТ „MAÎTRE DE LANGUES“

Димитър Веселинов

ДОЦ. Д-РУ ИЛИАНЕ ВЛАДОВОЙ 80 ЛЕТ

Валентина Аврамова

Книжка 2
THE FEAR TO TALK

Adriana Sotirova

Книжка 1
ПРОБЛЕМИТЕ НА ЛИНГВОДИДАКТОЛОГИЯТА В ПРОСТРАНСТВЕНО-ВРЕМЕВАТА СИТУАЦИЯ НА ХХI ВЕК

Ако речникът е цялата Вселена, подредена по азбучен ред, то научното списание е хронология на науката, фиксирана в статии и съобщения, които с момента на своето отпечатване се превръщат в ав- тентични свидетелства за пътищата на познанието, трасирани от ревностни изследователи на непреход- ните теоретични истини в преходността на човешкия живот. Появяват се автори новатори, които маркират творческия подем на времето, и автори пазители на познанието, съграждано в продълж

ВСИЧКО ДА СТАВА ЗА ПОУКА

Радияна Дринова

2017 година
Книжка 6
LES RÔLES DES MOTS-CLEFS

Anélia Brambarova

НОВО ЗАВРЪЩАНЕ КЪМ МО

Бойка Илиева

Книжка 5
И НЕКА Д УМИТЕ ГОВОРЯТ. . . (Портрет на един бележит учен)

Димитър Веселинов, Екатерина Софрониева

Книжка 4
ЖИВОТЪТ НА КНИГАТА

Анна Ангелова

ИГРОВЫЕ ФОРМЫ ПОПУЛЯРИЗАЦИИ РУССКОГО ЯЗЫКА

Валерий Ефремов, Елена Петренко

ПОЕМ ПО-РУССКИ

Денис Букин

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
НОВИ ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИ ХОРИЗОНТИ

Димитър Веселинов, Главен редактор

2016 година
Книжка 6
ДИАЛОГ НА КУЛТУРИТЕ

Анна Ангелова

СВЕТЪТ КАТО СЛОВО

Магдалена Костова-Панайотова, Любка Ненова

НЕЩАТА ОТВЪТРЕ

Анелия Бръмбарова

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
РУССКИЙ ЯЗЫК СОВРЕМЕННОЙ РОССИИ

Вербицкая Людмила Алексеевна

Книжка 2
СТЕФАНА ДИМИТРОВА

Донка Мангачева

ТАТЯНА МИХАЙЛОВНА НИКОЛАЕВА

Стефана Димитрова

Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ КОЛЕГИ

Димитър Веселинов

ЗАБАВЛЕНИЯ ПО ФРЕНСКИ

Цвета Тодорова

DE VITA BEATA НА ПРЕВОДАЧА

Владимир Сабоурин

2015 година
Книжка 6
SCIENCES ET GUERRE, SCIENCES EN GUERRE

Ioan Panzaru, Florin Turcanu, Simona Necula

Книжка 5
СБОРНИК В ЧЕСТ НА ПРОФ. МАРИЯ КИТОВА

Магдалена Караджункова

Книжка 4
ДО УЧАСТНИЦИТЕ В VII МЕЖДУНАРОДНА КВАЛИФИКАЦИОННА ШКОЛА ВАРНА, 2015

«Ñîâðåìåííûå ïåäàãîãè÷åñêèå òåõíîëîãèè »

МОСКОВКИН ЛЕОНИД ВИКТОРОВИЧ

доктор педагогических наук, профессор кафедры русского языка как иностранного и методики его преподавания

ПОЧЕКАНСКА-НИКОЛЧОВА СТОЯНКА ГЕОРГИЕВА

Мастер-класс «Обучение РКИ в контексте исторической памяти и на-, циональной идентичности (на материале русской литературы)»

БУКИН ДЕНИС ЮРЬЕВИЧ

Сфера научных интересов

Книжка 3
ЗА ДУМАТА ЦИВИЛИЗАЦИЯ

Мария Костова

Книжка 2
ФРАНКОФОНИЯ И ФРАНКОФОНИ

Димитър Веселинов

БИТИЕТО НА ОБРАЗИТЕ

Йосиф Каменов

IN MEMORIAM

Elena Alekova

Книжка 1
LA LANGUE DANS L’OEIL ET LA PEAU

Tzvétiléna Krasteva

ЗАЕДНО ПРЕЗ ВЕКОВЕТЕ

Сабина Павлова

НОВ УЧЕБНИК ПО МЕТОДИКА НА ЧУЖДОЕЗИКОВОТО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Иванка Мавродиева, Димитър Веселинов

2014 година
Книжка 6
БИЛИНГВИЗЪМ В УСЛОВИЯТА НА НАРУШЕН СЛУХ

Светослава Съева, Ангелина Бекярова

ТРАКИЙСКИЯТ ЕЗИК

Светлана Янакиева

ПЪРВОСТРОИТЕЛЯТ

Анна Ангелова

ПОМАГАЛО ЗА НОВИТЕ БУДИТЕЛИ ОТ КЛАСНАТА СТАЯ

Ана Клисарска, Константин Фиданчев

ДЕТАЛЬ МОЖЕТ СТАТЬ СИМВОЛОМ ЭПОХИ

Борис Тимофеевич Евсеев – поэт, прозаик, эссеист. Лауреат премии Правительства Российской Федера- ции в области культуры и премии «Ве- нец», Бунинской, Горьковской и многих других литературных премий. Получил музыкальное, литературное и жур- налистское образование. В советское время публиковался в Самиздате. Ав- тор 15 книг прозы. Переводился на английский, болгарский, голландский, испанский, итальянский, китайский, немецкий, эстонский, японский и др.

Книжка 5
MIGRATING MEMORIES

Irina Peryanova

Книжка 4
ЕЗИКЪТ – НАУКА И ПРАКТИКА

Павлина Стефанова

ВРЕМЕНАТА ОТЛИТАТ, НАПИСАНОТО ОСТАВА

Магдалена Караджункова

Книжка 3
ОЦЕНЯВАНЕТО ОТ РОДИТЕЛИТЕ – ВЪЗМОЖНОСТИ И ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВА

Галина Хитрова, Диана Миронова, Янка Банкова, Павлина Йовчева

Книжка 2
ПРЕВОДЪТ В ЕВРОПА

Ирена Кръстева

ОБЩОБАЛКАНСКИТЕ КОРЕНИ

Русана Бейлери

Книжка 1
ПАДНАЛИТЕ АНГЕЛИ

Мони Алмалех

ПРОФ. Д-Р БАГРЕЛИЯ БОРИСОВА СЪБЧЕВА (1955 – 2013)

Весела Белчева, Свилен Станчев

ПРОЕКТ НА НАЦИОНАЛНО ИЗДАТЕЛСТВО „АЗ БУКИ“ И ФОНД „РУССКИЙ МИР“

ПРОЕКТ НА НАЦИОНАЛНО ИЗДАТЕЛСТВО „АЗ БУКИ“ И ФОНД „РУССКИЙ МИР“

2013 година
Книжка 6
ИЗ ДЕБРИТЕ НА ПОРТУГАЛИСТИКАТА

Весела Чергова. (2012). Конюнктивният имперфект в съвременния пор-

МАТУРА ПО ФРЕНСКИ ЗА ОТЛИЧЕН

Ботева, С., Кръстева, Ж. & Железарова-Сариева, А. 100% успех. Матура по френски език. София: Просвета. 298 с. ISBN: 9789540126258

Книжка 5
ПОЛИТИЧЕСКАТА РЕЧ – МОДЕЛИ НА ПОВЕДЕНИЕ И КОМУНИКАЦИЯ

Владислав Миланов, Надежда Михайлова-Сталянова. (2012). Езикови портрети на български политици. Част първа. София: УИ „Свети Климент Охридски“. 230 с. ISBN 978-954-07-3323-4

ПРОЕКТ НАЦИОНАЛЬНОГО ИЗДАТЕЛЬСТВА „АЗ БУКИ“ И ФОНДА „РУССКИЙ МИР“

Идея проекта «Открытая линия» - популяризация современных тенденции, исследования и анализы ведущих ученых в сфере обучения русскому языку как иностранному, а также - обмен опыта между болгарскими учителями. Проект реализируется Национального издательства «Аз Буки» - часть Ми- нистерство образования и науки Болгарии, вместе с фондом «Русский мир». Сегодня – благодаря мастер-классов, у нас есть исключительная возможность познакомится с новейшими разработками ведущих ученых и мето

Книжка 4
ЧУЖДОЕЗИКОВО ОБУЧЕНИЕ МЕЖДУ ТРАДИЦИИ И ИНОВАЦИИ, МЕЖДУ ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА ТЕОРИЯ И УЧЕБНА ПРАКТИКА

Чуждоезиковото обучение в съвременната образователна парадигма – теория, практика, перспективи. Велико Търново: Ивис, 2011, 277 с.

Книжка 3
COMPOUND VERBS FROM А COGNITIVE AND SEMANTIC PERSPECTIVE

Bagasheva, Alexandra. (2012). Refl ections on Compound Verbs and Com-

ТЕАТРАЛЬНАЯ АТМОСФЕРА В КЛАССЕ

Тодорова, Румяна В. Димитрова, Розалина И

ПРАЗНИК В МОЕТО УЧИЛИЩЕ

Анаит Киркорова

Книжка 2
ЗА УЧИТЕЛЯ И ЧОВЕКА ЧУДОМИР – АНАЛИЗ НА ЗАПИСКИТЕ МУ ЗА ЕДНО ПЪТУВАНЕ В ТУРЦИЯ

Мевсим, Хюсеин. Пътуването на Чудомир в Турция (1932). Пловдив: „Жанет 45“, 2012, 200 с. ISBN 978-954-491-785-2 Милена Йорданова

ФУНДАМЕНТАЛНИЯТ ТРУД НА МАРИЯ КИТОВА- ВАСИЛЕВА „ЛЮБОВТА КЪМ СЛОВОТО. ЗА ИЗВОРИТЕ НА НАУКАТА ЗА ЕЗИКА“

Китова-Василева, Мария. Любовта към словото. За изворите на науката за езика (От древността до края на Ренесанса). София: Колибри, 2012, 492 с. ISBN: 978-954-529-982-7x

БИЛИНГВАЛНО ПРЕДУЧИЛИЩНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Peter Doyé. Lernen in zwei Sprachen. Deutsch im bilingualen Kindergarten. Hildesheim – Zürich – New York: Georg Olms Verlag AG, 2012, 110 S. ISBN 978-3-487-08870-9

Книжка 1
LES MOYENS SYNTAXIQUES DU RHEME EN RUSSE

Anna Khaldoyanidi, Mary-Annick Morel

ИЗУЧАВАНЕ НА ЕЗИЦИ ОТ ЗРЕЛОСТНИЦИТЕ – НАГЛАСИ, ОЦЕНКИ, ПЕРСПЕКТИВИ1)

Албена Чавдарова, Росица Пенкова, Николина Цветкова

ВСИЧКИ РАЗБИРАТ ОСТИН

Донка Мангачева

ТВОРЕЦЪТ КАТО МОРЕПЛАВАТЕЛ

Аспарух Аспарухов

2012 година
Книжка 6
НА УЧИТЕЛЯ – ЛИЧНО

90 ГОДИНИ ОТ РОЖДЕНИЕТО НА ПРОФЕСОР ЖАНА МОЛХОВА

ПРОФЕСОР НИКОЛАЙ МИХОВ НА 70 ГОДИНИ

Даниела Кожухарова Николай Николов Михов е роден на 30 април 1942 г. в семейството на индустриалец. През 1956 г. заминава за София, за да учи в гимназия. Изу- чава руски и френски език, към които добавя факултативните латински, немски и английски. Учи неуморно и до днес. Професор-полиглот, който по време на кандидатстудентските кампа- нии, докато проверява работите по френски език, по време на кратката си почивка попълва тестовете по немски и по испански език, показвай

ЕВРОПЕЙСКИ ДЕН НА ЕЗИЦИТЕ

Цветанка Панова

РЕТРОСПЕКТИВНА БИБЛИОГРАФИЯ RETROSPECTIVE BIBLIOGRAPHY

Преди 50 години Симеонов, Йосиф. Някои трудности при изучаване на френски език. С., Наука и изкуство, 1962, 84 с. Методика на обучението по френски език в средния курс на общообра- зователните училища: Учебник за учит. инст. за прогимназ. учители / Валерия Карабаджева. София: Народна просвета, (1962), 192 с. Нагледна граматика на немски език / Жана Николова-Гълъбова. Со- фия: Народна просвета, 1962, 243 с. : с табл., 2 л. табл. Българско-немски речник / Александър Дорич, Герда Минкова, Стефан

КНИГИ И ПЕРИОДИЧНИ ИЗДАНИЯ, ПОЛУЧЕНИ В РЕДАКЦИЯТА BOOKS AND PERIODICALS RECEIVED

Ботева, С., Ж. Кръстева, А. Железарова-Сариева. 100% успех. Матура по френски език. София, Просвета, 298 с. Легурска, П. Семантичен речник на типологичните характеристики на вторичното назоваване в руския и българския език. София, Изда- телство „Ето“, 2011, 312 с. Легурска, П. Съпоставителни лексикални анализи и основа за съпос- тавка. София, Издателство „Ето“, 2011, 228 с. Мавродиева, Ив. Политическа реторика в България: от митингите до онлайн социалните мрежи (1989–2011 г.). Автореферат н

©2005 Национално Издателство Аз-Буки ООД. Всички права запазени.