Професионално образование

2023/4, стр. 315 - 326

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP

Резюме:

Ключови думи:

https://doi.org/10.53656/voc23-41scho

2023/4, стр. 315 - 326

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP

Dr. Phil Budgell
Education Leadership Consultancy – Sheeld (UK)

Abstract. In this paper, the principle of subsidiarity – that agency and choice should be delegated to the local level – is introduced. In education, it is proposed that:

– far greater responsibility should be delegated to School Leadership Teams; and that;

– successful Leadership in education requires a balance of principle (the moral basis of the school), purpose (the core business of the school) and people (social relationships in the school).

Aclear distinction is then drawn between leadership(complexity), management (clarity) and administration (consistency). This is followed by a discussion on distributed leadership, the idea that the leadership role is not confined to the Senior Leadership Team; but should, for example, involve subject leaders.

Finally, the idea of Governance is introduced: a process whereby a legally constituted team of local partners support and challenge the School Leadership Team; helping them to fulfil their responsibility for the leadership and management of the school.

School leadership – in the same way that:

“Vision without Action is Contemplation, and Action without
Vision is just Activity”;

“Leadership without Subsidiarity is Administration, and
Subsidiarity without Leadership is Abrogation”.

Agency and choice

The Oxford English Dictionary defines subsidiarity as "the principle that a central authority should have a subsidiary function, performing only those tasks which cannot be performed at a more local level": it is concerned with the delegation of agency and choice to the local level.

In as much as education is ultimately for the benefit of the pupil, the:

1. the quality of the education; and

2. standards of achievement;

depend on delegating agency and choice to the level closest to the pupil. Consequently, it is the state’s responsibility to determine the structure and organisation of the education system and the levels to which agency and choice should be delegated. Table 1 provides examples of the delegation of agency and choice to different levels in the education system.

Table 1. Agency and Choice

Level in theStructureAgency and ChoiceTheStateAllocating the national budget across di󰀨erent departments; e.g., 29%Health, 15% Education and 9% Defense.Allocating the national budget across local authorities – a local governmentnance settlement. Determining how much of that allocation must be spenton schools – a dedicated schools grant.TheMunicipalityDetermining the structure and organization of schools within the localauthority – number; primary/secondary; grammar school/comprehensive.Determining a funding formula that will allocate resources to individualschools.TheSchoolAllocating the school’s budget share across major categories ofexpenditure; e.g., 53% Teaching Sta󰀨; 24% Other Sta󰀨 Costs; 6%Premises Costs and 17% Supplies and Services. Constructing thetimetable and deploying the Teaching Sta󰀨.TheDepartmentChoosing the appropriate set of textbooks. Choosing an appropriateExamination Board. Establishing the assessment criteria and moderatingteachers’assessment within the Department to improve the reliability andvalidity of assessment grades.Analyze the results of all assessment tasksto ensure that all pupils are making good progress.TheTeacherAdopting a range of teaching methods that are appropriate to thedemands of the curriculum and the needs of the pupils. Ensuring that allassessment tasks are properly organized and administered to comply withdepartmental, school and examination requirements.ThePupilAgency and Choice for the pupils are di󰀩cult describe unless there isalready su󰀩cient subsidiarity to give them the right to choose what theywish to study. However, if they do have the right to choose, they also havethe responsibility to exercise that choice with care and consideration fortheir future.

Each school is a community of pupils with a unique mix of learning needs that calls for a range of strategies if:

1. that excellent quality of education; with

2. the highest standards of achievement;

are to be attained. Rather than centralized decisions on:

– the detail of curriculum;

– approaches to teaching; and

– the allocation of resources schools should have the opportunity to:

– establish their own priorities to meet pupils’ needs;

– select strategies to address these priorities;

– tailor the curriculum;

– allocate resources and select staff to ensure these strategies can be implemented;

– conduct professional development programs and in other ways help teachers acquire the knowledge and skill to deliver the preferred programs;

– monitor progress toward the achievement of targets; and

– provide incentives and reward success.

If all of these and other actions cohere and are implemented in the manner intended, there should be improvements for pupils and an overall contribution to school effectiveness.

The principle of subsidiarity, with its concomitant delegation of financial responsibility, authority and accountability, is the source of school autonomy. In which case, this autonomy ought to be delegated to the School Leadership Team within a centrally-determined framework of goals, policies, priorities, standards and accountabilities:

– clear financial regulations and procedures;

– the management of financial risk;

– the development of Key Performance Indicators (Budgell 2022); i.e., the national analysis of examination performance that measures progress, school valueadded and enables the Governing Body to hold the School Leadership Team to account; and

– a national system of school inspection that will provide the Governing Body with an external evaluation of the Overall Effectiveness of the school and similarly enables them to hold the Leadership Team to account.

This Local Management of Schools (LMS), or school-based management, with its:

– clear framework for delegation; accompanied by

– a similarly clear framework for accountability;

should enable subsidiarity to be the driving force behind:

1. an improvement in the quality of education; and

2. a raising in the standards of achievement.

Leadership

When an education system is characterised by subsidiarity, it is a natural corollary that School Leadership Teams live up to their name and provide effective leadership. It is no longer sucient that their role and function can be characterised as routine administration.

The quality of leadership is fundamental to:

– school improvement;

– school effectiveness;

– achieving high performance; and

– bringing about change and innovation.

There is a high correlation between the quality of leadership and a school’s success. It is possible to establish a direct causal relationship between:

leadership;

and

– organizational success;

– teacher performance; and

– pupil achievement.

The argument for a concentration on effective leadership in schools has been well understood for several years. It is now possible to argue, with substantial confidence, that leadership is a pivotal variable in explaining the relative success and failure of many human enterprises, not least schools.

Leadership is seen as having a responsibility for the values by which the school works. What the right things are is, of course, highly contestable and will be the product of:

– personal values;

– the prevailing moral consensus in society;

– the dominant moral hegemony;

– setting the purpose and direction of the school;

PrinciplePeoplePurpose

Figure 1. The nature of leadership

– defining the path forward;

– articulating what the school actually exists to do;

– how it should be in the future;

– the complexity of human relationships;

– performance; and

– engagement and motivation.

Leadership has to be seen as relational and only exists in the extent to which there is emotional engagement and sophisticated interpersonal relationships.

– so that they are balanced and mutually supportive – as shown in Figure 1.

Leadership, management and administration

The debate about the relationship between leadership and management is fundamental to an understanding of what makes schools effective. It is very clear that the personal priorities of leaders;

– how they schedule their time, resources and energy, have enormous impact on the way in which a school works. In essence, the issue of the relationship between leadership and management is the issue of:

– stasis or change;

– the status quo or transformation;

– good or great; and

– improving or transforming.

Therefore, it is central to any discussion of the nature of roles in schools. WestBurnham (2010). The quality of leadership is fundamental to:

– school improvement;

– school effectiveness;

– achieving high performance; and

– bringing about change and innovation.

There is a high correlation between the quality of leadership and organizational success. It is possible to establish a direct causal relationship between:

– leadership;

– organizational success;

– teacher performance; and

– student achievement.

Leadershipmoves us beyond the limited and narrow boundaries of management into far greater challenges where the demands and the stakes are higher but so are the rewards.

At the same time, it is important to remember that leadership:

– needs to be balanced by effective management;

– the strategic perspective has to be related to the operational.

Good management is beguiling, even seductive. There is a deep satisfaction to be found in order, structure and a sense, however artificial, of control. Equally leadership can be demanding, challenging and even intimidating – it’s much easier to manage – easier still to administer.

Reports from OFSTED in England found that leadership at the school level had improved over the past 7 years but that there were still many schools where work was not managed eectively. Of course, we are talking about even greater expectations – not management but leadership that promotes the conditions of sustainability (Fullan 2005).

Management is concerned with:

– translating principles into actual practice;

– ‘doing things right’;

– focusing on systems, structures and delivery.

– ensuring that the purpose is reected across the organisation in its day-to-day working; and

– deployment of staff, the allocation of resources and delivery.

Administration is about:

– doing all the routine tasks;

– the organisational routines;

– infrastructure;

– everything is in place – the path is kept tidy; and

– that consistency supports all the factors above.

One way of understanding the relationship between leadership and management to define their relative contributions to the way in which a school operates. In addition, because it plays an important role in the life of every school, it is also worth introducing routine administrative work into the equation (Table 2).

Таble 2. Leadership, Management and Administration

LeadershipManagementAdministrationDoing the right thingsDoing things rightDoing thingsPath makingPath followingPath tidyingComplexityClarityConsistency

Distributed Leadership – The Myth of the Hero Innovator; (Georgides and Phillamore 1957).

– Individual/heroic leadership is not sustainable in a complex and rapidly changing school.

– Hierarchical leadership cannot be morally justified in a school committed to learning in a democratic society.

– Shared leadership recognises and enhances professionalism and genuine collegiality.

– A team-based approach to school organisation requires shared leadership.

– Shared leadership increases the possibility of alignment on vision and values.

– Shared leadership releases the creative capacity of everyone.

– Sustainable performance is more likely to be achieved with shared leadership.

The growth in interest in the development of distributed leadership, hence:

– middle leaders rather than middle managers;

has been illustrated by Leithwood et al (2006). They have stressed importance of middle leaders:

”The most significant results of this study……… were the indirect eects of total leadership on pupil learning and achievement, through its direct eects on the three dimensions of sta performance:

commitment;

resilience; and

eectiveness.

Total leadership accounted for a quite significant 27 per cent of the variation in pupil achievement across schools” (Leithwood et al 2006).

The key phrase here is ‘total leadership’, recognising that while the work of the designated leader is important, there is substantial leadership available in the school that is not necessarily linked to organisational role or status.

”Ultimately, leadership that stays centred on learning and that lasts over time is deliberately distributed leadership that stretches across a school or system, is a genuinely shared responsibility, and is taken as much as it is given.” (Hargreaves and Fink 2006).

In essence, and this is the real challenge, distributed leadership means that leadership is seen as collective capacity rather than personal status.

Theory into practice

“…too many schools, school districts and state systems of schooling are overmanaged and under-led. This condition leads to an undue emphasis on doing things right rather than doing the right things, on following directions rather than solving problems” (Sergiovanni 2005).

Sergiovanni is talking about education systems that are not characterised by subsidiarity: top-down autocracies that:

– are over-administered, under-led and under-managed; and

– focus on compliance – on following directions from the top, rather than doing the right thing.

It is in education systems like those described by Sergiovanni that School Leadership Teams only function as administrators: the system inhibits the development of high-level leadership skills. In fact, it positively discourages their development; filling the School Leadership Teams’ time with ‘busy work’ (filling in countless, pointless forms) and then checking that they have complied with the latest set of instructions.

In as much as education is ultimately for the benefit of the pupils, The State’s responsibility is to determine the structure and organisation of the education system and the level to which:

– agency and choice; with

– their rights and responsibilities must be delegated. The most appropriate level is The School: a community of pupils with a unique mix of learning needs that calls for a range of strategies if:

1. an excellent quality of education; and

2. high standards of achievement are to be attained.

School Leadership Teams must have the opportunity to lead, to:

– establish the priorities to meet pupils’ needs;

– select strategies to address these priorities;

– tailor the curriculum;

– allocate resources and select staff to ensure these strategies can be implemented;

– conduct professional development programs and in other ways help teachers acquire the knowledge and skill to deliver the preferred programs;

– monitor progress toward the achievement of targets; and

– provide incentives and reward success.

There is no need for the State to specify:

1. The number of periods during the week.

2. The length of a period.

3. The number of pupils in each class.

4. The balance of subjects across the week.

These decisions should be left to the individual School Leadership Teams and Governing Bodies. The State need only specify:

– the number of teaching/learning hours during the week; for example, a minimum of 25 hours;

– and the percentage of free choice that pupils have as the get older; for example, 35% in Grades 9 and 10 and 80% in Grades 11 and 12.

Governance

A process whereby a legally constituted team of local partners support and challenge the School Leadership Team; helping them to fulfil their responsibility for the leadership and management of the school. In a national structure characterised by subsidiarity, the Governing Body is responsible for working with the School Leadership Team to ensure that the school delivers:

1. that excellent quality of education; with

2. very high standards of achievement.

Together with the School Leadership Team, who are responsible for day-today management, the Governing Body sets the school's aims and policies. The Governing Body must be transparent and accountable in the recruitment of staff, governance structures and attendance at meetings and contact with parents.

The key roles of the Governing Body are to:

– ensure clarity of vision, ethos and strategic direction;

– hold the Leadership Team to account for the educational performance of the school and its pupils, and the performance management of staff; and

– oversee the financial performance of the school and make sure its money is well spent.

Conclusion

The successful reconstruction of an education system will be predicated upon:

School Leadership Teams developing the necessary knowledge, skills and understanding to become effective Leaders and Managers; enabling them to

– allocate the school’s budget share across major categories of expenditure; e.g., 53% Teaching Staff; 24% Other Staff Costs; 6% Premises Costs and 17% Supplies and Services,

– construct the timetable and deploy the Teaching Staff.

• the introduction of Distributed Leadership, structures that enable subject leaders to

– develop their knowledge, skills and understanding of leadership at departmental, faculty or functional level;

– choose the appropriate set of textbooks;

– choose the appropriate examination;

– establish the assessment criteria and moderating teachers’ assessment within the department to improve the reliability and validity of assessment grades; and – analyze the results of all assessment tasks to ensure that all pupils are making good progress.

• the introduction of Governing Bodies to work with School Leadership Teams, supporting them but holding them to account.

NOTES

1. OFSTED: Oce for Standards in Education www.gov.uk/government/ organisations/ofsted

REFERENCES

BUDGELL, P., 2022. Key Performance Indicators. “Az-buki” Education and Scientific Policies [Submitted for publication].

FULLAN, M., 2005. Leadership and Sustainability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

GEORGIDES, N. & PHILLIMORE, L., 1975. The myth if the heroinnovator and alternative strategies for organisational change. In: C. KIERNAN & E.P. WOODFORD (eds). Behaviour Modification with the Severely Retarded. Amsterdam: Assoc. Sci. Pub.

HARGREAVES, A. and FINK, D., 2006. Sustainable Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

LEITHWOOD, K. et al., 2006. Seven Strong Claims about School Leadership. Nottingham: National College [formerly National College for School Leadership].

SERGIOVANNI, T., 2005. Strengthening the Heartbeat. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

WEST-BURNHAM, J., 2010. Understanding leadership and management. Nottingham: National College [formerly National College for School Leadership].

Dr. Phil Budgell Education Leadership Consultancy Sheeld, UK E-mil: phil.budgell@btinternet.com

У ниверситет за национално и световно стопанство

Докторантски семинар №4

University of National and World Economy

Doctoral Seminar №4

www.unwe.bg

Докторантски семинар №4

В края на май 2023 г. в УНСС се проведе „Докторантски семинар №4“. Организатор е катедра „Медии и обществени комуникации“ на УНСС, която през 2022 г. придоби статут на катедра на ЮНЕСКО „Медийна и информационна грамотност и културни политики за устойчиво развитие“.

В два поредни броя, сп. „Професионално образование“ представя отличените доклади от конференцията.

В настоящия брой представяме разработките на Мая Бойчева, Любослава Миткова, Василена Иванова, Мария Константинова и Симона Нанова.

www.unwe.bg

2025 година
Книжка 1-2
2024 година
Книжка 5-6
Книжка 4
Книжка 2-3
ДА НАВЛЕЗЕМ В НАУКАТА С ИГРИ

Д-р Стефан Петров

Книжка 1
2023 година
Книжка 6
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА ЕЛЕКТРОННИТЕ ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИ РЕСУРСИ В ИНTЕРДИСЦИПЛИНАРНИТЕ STEM УРОЦИ

Д-р Емилия Лазарова , Веселина Иванова , Ирина Костадинова , Анета Кинева , Георги Йорданов

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP

Dr. Phil Budgell

Книжка 3
ИЗКУСТВЕНИЯТ ИНТЕЛЕКТ В ЗДРАВНИЯ PR

Гергана Дончева Янков

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
NOT SO MUCH AN AXIOMATIC SYSTEM, MORE A TAXONOMY OF EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES

Phil Budgel , Mitko Kunchev Education Leadership Consultancy – Sheeld (UK) Ruse (Bulgaria)

2022 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
CREATIVE REFLECTION

Eng. Janneke Camps

Книжка 4
STEM В КЛАСНАТА СТАЯ

(Ролята на технологиите и играта като част от образователния процес) Ива Григорова

Книжка 3
ПРИЛАГАНЕ НА PERMA МОДЕЛ В ИНОВАТИВЕН STEM ПРЕДМЕТ „КОСМИЧЕСКИ ИЗСЛЕДВАНИЯ“

Михаил Бориславов Ненов, Севил Юсуф Иванова, Грета Димитрова Стоянова, Таня Маркова Сребрева

ПАНАИР НА НАУКАТА

Грета Стоянова

Книжка 2
THE CURRICULUM

Phil Budgell

Книжка 1
ТРУДНО ЛИ Е ПОРАСТВАНЕТО В ИСТОРИЯТА

Иво Точевски, д-р Бистра Таракова

2021 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ПРОУЧВАНЕ НАГЛАСИТЕ НА УЧИТЕЛИТЕ ОТ НАЧАЛЕН ЕТАП ОТНОСНО ЗДРАВНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НА УЧЕНИЦИТЕ

Доц. Ивайло Прокопов, доц. Мирена Легурска, гл. ас. Весела Мирчева

Книжка 4
БЪЛГАРСКА АДАПТАЦИЯ НА ВЪПРОСНИКА ЗА ИЗМЕРВАНЕ НА ДИСТРЕС НА ИДЕНТИЧНОСТТА

доц. д-р Ева Папазова , доц. д-р Маргарита Бакрачева

МОТИВАЦИЯ ЧРЕЗ СЪЗДАВАНЕ НА ЧУВСТВО ЗА ПРИНАДЛЕЖНОСТ

Възможните пътища за успешна реализация Бистра Григорова

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
НАПРЕД КЪМ СЛЕДВАЩАТА МИСИЯ

Милена Маринова-Димитрова

Книжка 1
БИО- И ЕКОПРОДУКТИ

Християна Янкова

2020 година
Книжка 6
БИНАРНИЯТ УРОК РАЗКРИВА ВРЪЗКАТА МЕЖДУ ИСТОРИЯ И ПРАВО

Евдокия Любомирова, Николина Димитрова

Книжка 5
СТАТИСТИЧЕСКА ИЗВАДКА ОТ ПРОВЕДЕНО ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ ПО НАУЧЕН ПРОЕКТ ЗА ПРОЯВИТЕ НА АГРЕСИВНОСТ И ДЕПРЕСИЯ НА СТУДЕНТИ

Анжелина Янева, Елица Стоянова, Марияна Алберт, Бояна Митрева, Валерия Луканова, Таня Гавраилова

Книжка 4
ЗЛАТНОТО СЕЧЕНИЕ НА ЗЛАТНАТА МАСКА

Денис Сираков, Мариета Сиракова, Николай Сираков

ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА ПРОФИЛЕН ПОДХОД ПРИ НАСОЧВАНЕ НА УЧЕНИЦИ ЗА ВКЛЮЧВАНЕ В ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНАТА СИСТЕМА

Мария Георгиева, Мая Рогашка, Петя Йорданова, Деница Русева, Емилия Кожухарова, Златомира Михайлова, Петя Георгиева

КАПСУЛА НА ВРЕМЕТО

Йозлем Искренова

УЧИТЕЛЯТ ДНЕС

Надежда Иванова

Книжка 3
ИГРОВИЗАЦИЯТА – УСПЕШЕН МЕТОД ЗА ОБУЧЕНИЕ В ЧАСОВЕТЕ ПО БИОЛОГИЯ И ЗДРАВНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Мария Веселинска, Атанасия Илиева, Александра Манасиева, Любен Новоселски

ДОБРИ ПРАКТИКИ

Марияна Великова, Пепа Атанасова

STEM УРОЦИТЕ, КОИТО ПРОВЕЖДАМЕ

Мария Велкова, Тодор Добрев

КРЕАТИВНИЯТ УЧИТЕЛ – НАЙ-ЦЕННАТА ИНОВАЦИЯ

Марияна Великова, Станимира Желязкова

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
ПРИКАЗКА ЗА ЕДНО ГОЛЯМО УЧИЛИЩЕ В ЕДНО МАЛКО ГРАДЧЕ

Ана Боргоджийска, Павлина Плачкова

ПОСТИГАНЕ НА БАЗОВА ГРАМОТНОСТ НА УЧЕНИЦИТЕ ОТ II КЛАС

Даниела Говедарска, Мария Котова, Ивелина Масалджийска

ГОЛЯМОТО ПРИКЛЮЧЕНИЕ, НАРЕЧЕНО ДИКТОВКА

Ангелина Генчева, Мая Драгоева

КАК УЧИЛИЩЕН ДВОР В ГРАД РАКОВСКИ СТАНА ЛЮБИМО МЯСТО ЗА ИГРИ, УЧЕНЕ И ОТДИХ

Ана Боргоджийска, Янка Арлашка, Ивана Лесова, Ани Димитрова

ДОБРИ ПРАКТИКИ В ПРЕПОДАВАНЕТО

Милена Лесова, Моника Даржалиева-Косова

УЧИЛИЩЕ НА РАДОСТТА

Павлина Плачкова, Кремена Алексиева

ПЪТЯТ НА ЕДНА МЕЧТА

Люба Сергева

2019 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ЦЕРН – ЕДНА СБЪДНАТА МЕЧТА

Свежина Димитрова, Зорница Захариева

ДУАЛНОТО ОБУЧЕНИЕ – МИРАЖ ИЛИ РЕАЛНОСТ, РЕАЛНОСТ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВА

Мария Георгиева, Надежда Илиева, Петя Йорданова

ГОРАТА – ОЧАРОВАНИЕТО НА ЖИВОТА

Елена Милчева, Игнат Игнатов, Венетка Илиева, Иринка Христова

БАЛКОНЪТ – МОЯТА ГРАДИНА

Деница Русева, Дарина Кирчева, Емилия Кожухарова, Марина Борисова

ПРОГРАМА „ЕРАЗЪМ+“ – СТИМУЛ ЗА УЧЕНЕ ПРЕЗ ЦЕЛИЯ ЖИВОТ

Даниела Мантарова, Станислава Анастасова

Книжка 4
ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЕ МЕЖДУ ЕКИПИТЕ ЗА ПОДКРЕПА ЗА ЛИЧНОСТНО РАЗВИТИЕ С РОДИТЕЛИ НА УЧЕНИЦИ СЪС СПЕЦИАЛНИ ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИ ПОТРЕБНОСТИ

Maрия Стефанова, Пламена Желева, Миглена Стоева Мария Георгиева, Мая Рогашка, Живка Дойчева

КОГАТО УРОКЪТ ЗАПОЧНА…

Ивелина Стамболийска

Книжка 3
СТАТИСТИКА ЧРЕЗ ВЪВЕЖДАНЕ НА ИКТ

Магдалена Каменарова

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
РАЗВИТИЕ НА ТОЛЕРАНТНОСТ ЧРЕЗ СПОРТ

Татяна Янчева, Ина Владова

КАК СЪВРЕМЕННИТЕ РОДИТЕЛИ ОБЩУВАТ С ДЕЦАТА СИ? ПОЗИТИВНИ МЕТОДИ ЗА ВЪЗПИТАНИЕ

Мария Георгиева, Мая Рогашка, Живка Дойчева, Златомира Михайлова

УЧРЕДЯВАНЕ НА КОМИТЕТ „БАБОЛАНДИЯ“

Йоанна Димитрова, Рая Енчева

КУКЕРИ

Йоанна Димитрова, Радина Стоянова

ДЕЦАТА – НАШЕТО БЪДЕЩЕ

Йоанна Димитрова, Мария Кузманова

CONTENT AND LANGUAGE INTEGRATED LEARNING (CLIL)

Надежда Алексиева

2018 година
Книжка 6
НОВИ ПРАКТИКИ В ОБУЧИТЕЛНИЯ ПРОЦЕС

Генка Георгиева, Маргарита Гиргинова

ЩАДЯЩА ПРОЦЕДУРА ПРИ РАЗПИТ НА ДЕЦА

Фахредин Фаредин Молламехмед

Книжка 5
КОИ СА НАЙ-ЕФЕКТИВНИТЕ ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛСКИ МЕТОДИ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО ПО ПРИРОДНИ НАУКИ

(И по-големият броя учебни часове означава ли непременно по-високи резултати – по данни на PISA 2015)

SEO И МЕТОДИ ЗА АНАЛИЗ – ТЕНДЕНЦИИ ПРЕЗ 2018

Ивайло Димитров, Слави Димитров

УСПЕШНИ ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ ПРАКТИКИ В ОБЛАСТТА НА ИНТЕРКУЛТУРНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

(Описание на педагогически практики) Стойна Делчева

Книжка 4
КАДРОВАТА КРИЗА В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Свежина Димитрова, Мария Нестерова, Галина Германова

ПОЛОВИ РАЗЛИЧИЯ И ПОЛОВИ РОЛИ

Владимира Иванова

УЧЕБНА ПРОГРАМА ЗА ОБУЧЕНИЕ ПО ГЕОГРАФИЯ И ИКОНОМИКА

(Допълнителна подготовка – профил „Икономическо развитие“, VІІІ клас)

ДОБРИ ПРАКТИКИ И НОВИ ФОРМИ ЗА ЗАНИМАНИЯ ПО ИНТЕРЕСИ И ИЗЯВА НА ДЕЦАТА И УЧЕНИЦИТЕ

(Организиране и провеждане на литературен конкурс от ученици)

Книжка 3
ИЗСЛЕДВАНИЯ, СВЪРЗАНИ С КОНСТАНТАТА НА КАПРЕКАР

Петко Казанджиев, Мартин Иванов, Цеца Байчева, Кинка Кирилова-Лупанова

Книжка 2
АНАЛИЗ НА ЕПИЧЕСКА ТВОРБА

Марияна Георгиева

УЧИЛИЩЕ НА РАДОСТТА

Веселина Тонева

ЕКОЛОГИЧНА ЕКСПЕДИЦИЯ „ДА ПАЗИМ ПРИРОДАТА!“

Татяна Болградова Красимира Мишкова

Книжка 1
В ПАМЕТ НА ПРОФ. МАРИАНА ГЕНЧЕВА

Преди една година внезапно ни напусна проф. д-р инж. Мариана Генчева. Редакционната колегия на сп. „Професионално образование“ и колегиите по

ОБУЧЕНИЕТО КАТО ВЪЗМОЖНОСТ

Диана Илиева-Атанасова

КЪМ РОДИТЕЛИТЕ

(Из педагогическите търсения на една майка)

ДЕТСКА ЕКОАКАДЕМИЯ

Диана Димитрова

ЕДИН ОБИКНОВЕН ДЕН В УЧИЛИЩЕ

Диана Димитрова, Светлана Бозова, Кина Невенова

ДРЕВНИ ОБРЕДИ И СЪВРЕМЕННИ ПУБЛИЧНИ ПРАКТИКИ

Диана Димитрова, Мариана Чаушева, Силвия Кейванова

СЪХРАНИ БЪЛГАРСКОТО

Мариана Чаушева

АНЕКДОТИ ОТ УЧИЛИЩНИЯ ЖИВОТ

Педагогически екип

2017 година
Книжка 6
ЩАСТЛИВИ И ЗДРАВИ ЗАЕДНО

Гергана Петрова, Анета Русева

ЕК ПРИЕМА ИНИЦИАТИВА ЗА НАСЪРЧАВАНЕ НА ЧИРАКУВАНЕТО В ЕВРОПА

Генерална дирекция „Заетост, социални въпроси и приобщаване“

Книжка 5
УПРАВЛЕНИЕ НА ПРОМЕНИТЕ

Диана Димитрова

ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ ЕТЮДИ

Диана Димитрова

ТРУДНО Е ДА БЪДЕШ РАЗЛИЧЕН

Стефанка Пампорова

ЛИДЕР В ИНОВАЦИИТЕ

Гергана Петрова

КОМПЮТЪРНА ГРАФИКА В МАТЕМАТИЧЕСКА ГИМНАЗИЯ

Румен Манолов, Ваня Шипчанова

Книжка 4
ГРАФИЧЕН МЕТОД ЗА РЕШАВАНЕ НА УРАВНЕНИЯ

Информационните технологии – инструментариум за решаване на математически проблеми

Книжка 3
УЧИЛИЩЕН МЕДИАТОР – ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВО И РЕАЛНОСТ

Марина Николова Бисерка Михалева

ТЕМАТА ЗА ПРИЯТЕЛСТВОТО И ОБЩУВАНЕТО

Детелина Георгиева Христова

Книжка 2
СЪЩНОСТ И ПОЛЗИ ОТ CLIL ОБУЧЕНИЕТО

Иванка Пукнева, Людмила Рижук

СТЪПАЛАТА

Митко Кунчев

НЕ САМО С ЛИНИЙКА И ПЕРГЕЛ

Боряна Куюмджиева

Книжка 1
2016 година
Книжка 6
СПОРТ ЗА КРАСОТА И ЗДРАВЕ

Маргарита Врачовска, Мария Маркова

„БРЕЗИЧКА“ ДИША

Иванка Харбалиева

ДА ИГРАЕМ ЗАЕДНО

Маруся Обретенова

ПОСЛАНИЦИ НА ЗДРАВЕТО

Ученически съвет и IX , IX , X клас Консултанти: Валерия Димова и Цецка Вълкова – учители по биология и здравно образование и география и икономика

ЗАЩО МЕДИАЦИЯ?

Татяна Дронзина, Бисерка Михалева

АСТРОПАРТИ

Радка Костадинова

ДА СИ УЧИТЕЛ

Катя Димитрова

Книжка 5
ПЕТ МИНУТИ СТИГАТ ДА СТАНЕШ ЖУРНАЛИСТ

Дарина Стайкова Хаджийска

ИНДИЙСКИ ПРИКАЗКИ

Марияна Хаджийска

ЧИТАЛИЩЕТО КАТО КЛАСНА СТАЯ

Станимира Никова

Книжка 4
Книжка 3
ПРЕДПРИЕМАЧЕСКИ УМЕНИЯ

Албена Вуцова, Емил Митов

КАНИМ ТЕАТЪРА НА УРОК ПО РУСКИ ЕЗИК

Розалина Димитрова, Румяна Тодорова

Книжка 2
КЛАСНА СТАЯ НА БЪДЕЩЕТО

Даниела Самарджиева, Тихомира Нанева

В ПОДКРЕПА НА EPALE В БЪЛГАРИЯ

Валентина Дейкова

ENTER INTERNATIONAL STUDY WEEK IN VIENNA, AUSTRIA

Daniela Atanasova, Nedyalka Palagacheva

THE SCHOOL IN THE GLOBAL VILLAGE

Svetlana Kalapisheva, Nikolina Koinarska

Книжка 1
2015 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
Книжка 2

Книжка 1
2014 година
Книжка 6
ЕЛЕКТРОННО ОБУЧЕНИЕ И КОМПЮТЪРЕН ДИЗАЙН (CAD) НА ПОДВЪРЗИИ

Росен Петков, Елица Личева, Даниела Атанасова

ПРАЗНИК НА СЛОВОТО

Трудни са времената, в които живеем. Увлечени в борбата за насъщния, притиснати от неизвестността и несигурното, утре забравяме за онази, друга- та храна, която е необходима за духа, която храни душата. Децата ни също но- сят своя кръст, лутат се, търсейки път, а ние, възрастните, често не можем да им помогнем . Не искам да влизам в полемиката с философите кое e по-важно

Книжка 5
ACTIVATING METHODS AND SOCRATIC DIALOGUE

Jan-Willem Noom, Ard Sonneveld

Книжка 4
LEARNING TO GIVE POWER TO THE PEOPLE: COMPETENCES FOR STUDENTS AND YOUNG PROFESSIONALS*

Jeroen de Vries, Frans van den Goorbergh 1. Public Participation in Planning Projects Public participation in the Netherlands is a crucial issue because the public is becoming more aware of their right to infl uence policies, design, management and maintenance. Furthermore the national and local governments have a policy to stimulate public participation to enhance maintenance and development of urban open space. In the aftermath of the credit crunch local authorities and project developers

ЦЕРН – ЕДНА СБЪДНАТА МЕЧТА

Свежина Димитрова

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
ENVIRONMENT AND INNOVATION

Tonya Georgieva

ENTER IN BULGARIA - DIFFERENT APPROACH AND NEW HORIZON

An interview with Jan-Willem Noom, Vice-President of ENTER

Книжка 1
КАК ДА РАЗБИРАМЕ ПОВЕДЕНИЕТО НА ДЕТЕТО ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛНО ПОВЕДЕНИЕ

Звездица Пенева-Ковачева Как да разбираме поведението на дететою Част от ключовите професионални компетенции в педагогическата работа са свързани с умението да разбираме поведението на детето, демонстрирано тук и сега. Разбирането му от страна на педагога означава да си отговорим на въпросите: защо се проявява това поведение, каква е причината за него, как да повлияем на детето така, че ако поведението е нежелано, повече да не се прояви... Въпроси, които си задаваме всеки път, когато сме

ЕФЕКТИВНА НАМЕСА ОТ СТРАНА НА ВЪЗРАСТНИТЕ ПРИ АГРЕСИВНО ПОВЕДЕНИЕ НА ДЕЦАТА

Генадий Матвеев В някои случаи при проява на детска агресия се налага незабавна намеса от страна на възрастните. Този вид намеса цели намаляване или избягване на агресивното поведение в конфликтни и напрегнати ситуации. За по-голям ефект на въздействие срещу агресивното поведение на детето предлагаме ня- колко съвета както към педагозите, така и към родителите. Следващите няколко правила и техники за намеса позволяват при конфликт- на ситуация да се открие позитивен начин за разрешаванет

2013 година
Книжка 6
THE NEW EU PROGRAMME ERASMUS+

Androulla Vassiliou Doris Pack

Книжка 5
ECO BUILDING BECOMES A WINDOW TO KNOWLEDGE

To know not only how to grow a fl ower, but also – where to place it

Книжка 4
Книжка 3
П О К А Н А

На 29 май 2013 г. от 10.00 ч. в БТА ще бъде представен проект BG051РО001-7.0.07 - 0029 „Приложение на ИКТ в образованието –

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2012 година
Книжка 6
ПРОФЕСИОНАЛНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

ЕDUСATIONAL JOURNAL 14, 2012

Книжка 5
РЕПУБЛИКА БЪЛГАРИЯ Министър на образованието, младежта и науката Д

УВАЖАЕМИ ГОСПОДИН РЕКТОР, УВАЖАЕМИ ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛИ И СТУДЕНТИ, Приемете сърдечните ми поздрави във връзка със знаменателната годишнина – 90 години от създаването на ВТУ „Тодор Каблешков“, първото специализирано висше

Книжка 4
АСПЕКТИ НА ПРОДЪЛЖАВАЩО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НА УЧИТЕЛИ ПО ПРИРОДНИ НАУКИ

(резултати от проучване мнението на учители за интегриране на ин- формационни и комуникационни технологии в обучението)

ПРОФЕСИОНАЛНА ГИМНАЗИЯ ПО СТРОИТЕЛСТВО И АРХИТЕКТУРА ГРАД ПАЗАРДЖИК

Професионална гимназия по строителство и архитектура – град Пазар-

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
РЕЙТИНГИ, ИНДЕКСИ, ПАРИ

Боян Захариев