Стратегии на образователната и научната политика

https://doi.org/10.53656/str2024-1s-13-sta

2024/1s, стр. 163 - 172

STATE AND BARRIERS TO THE DIGITALIZATION OF SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES IN BULGARIA

Boyko Takov
E-mail: boyko.takov@unwe.bg
Intellectual Property and Technological Transfer Department
Business Faculty
University of National and World Economy
Studentski district
19 December 8th St.
1700 Sofia Bulgaria

Резюме: In the year 2021, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) constituted 99.81% of the total number of enterprises in Bulgaria. The number of individuals employed by SMEs accounted for 74.2% of the entire workforce. These enterprises contributed 66.5% of the overall economy’s added value, and this share has consistently been on the rise. Their development significantly influences the employment rate, overall economic growth, and the prosperity of our nation. Technological advancements and recent crises in recent years have spurred accelerated digitization across all spheres of public life, including business sector. It is increasingly penetrating SMEs in Bulgaria, albeit with a certain lag compared to the EU. There is no doubt that the digitization of SMEs serves as a crucial mechanism for achieving competitiveness and economic success, not only for the enterprises themselves, but also for our country as a whole. Given this context, the objective of this publication is to briefly present the summarized results of an analysis of the level of digitization of SMEs in Bulgaria and the examination of the key factors hindering its further development, serving as barriers to its progress. These findings can be valuable for guiding the efforts of managers and government entities in fostering the advancement of digitization in SMEs.

Ключови думи: small and medium-sized enterprises; digitization; barriers; research; results

JEL 03

Introduction

1. According to data from the Executive Agency for the Promotion of Small and Medium sized Enterprises in 2021, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) accounted for 99.81% of the total number of enterprises in Bulgaria. The number of employees in these enterprises constituted 74.2% of the entire workforce. They contributed 66.5% of the added value to the overall economy, and this share has been steadily increasing1. Their development significantly influences the employment rate, overall economic growth, and the prosperity of our country. However, SMEs face growing challenges and uncertainties. They are highly vulnerable to a series of emerging crises, including supply chain disruptions, rising resource prices, demographic challenges, and more. The trend is an increasing competition at both regional and global levels. In these conditions, their flexibility, innovation, and their approach to developing knowledge and skills become crucial for their success.

Technological advancements and recent crises in recent years have prompted accelerated digitization across all spheres of public life, including the business sector. It is increasingly permeating SMEs in our country, albeit with a certain lag compared to the EU, and brings significant opportunities for expediting their development.

The advantages of digitization for SMEs are multifaceted, continually expanding with technological progress. It facilitates the rapid and easy collection, processing, and analysis of information for making timely and informed management decisions. It is associated with streamlining communications and expediting transactions with partners, automating manual processes, and rationalizing operations. As a result, productivity is enhanced, costs are reduced, control is improved, and the quality and competitiveness of products are heightened. It forms the foundation for optimizing administrative activities and the development of digital marketing.

Digitalization facilitates the international contacts of SMEs, providing them with timely access to current information about markets and competitors and supporting their rapid response to new requirements and changes. Thus, despite being small in size, these enterprises can successfully participate in international trade and gradually transform into international companies. Digital methods assist SMEs in their innovative activities and in the development and implementation of various projects.

Cybersecurity is of paramount importance for any company, as untimely and incorrect decisions can result in significant losses. Some external factors that can negatively impact the enterprise include foreign corporate espionage in the field of the company’s development activities, related to new products, know-how, trade secrets, new markets, prices, quality of raw materials, and more (Krushkov 2020).

Intellectual property is a topic that directly impacts the digitization of SMEs, as per Stoyanova P.‘s thesis, identifying intellectual property is crucial for the successful digital transformation of businesses. Recognizing the potential of intellectual property in the digital economy is essential as a primary driving force for competitiveness and innovative activities. The digital strategy of a business results from close collaboration between management, intellectual property experts, software developers, and digital marketing. (Stoyanova 2023).

These and a series of other advantages of digitization contribute to the enhancement of the adaptability and flexibility of SMEs, their efficiency, competitiveness, and the sustainability of their long-term development.

The significance of digitization is increasingly recognized by Bulgarian business leaders. According to the results of a study conducted by the Association of Industrial Capital in Bulgaria, involving 116 enterprises from 13 economic sectors, 70% of the surveyed businesses in Bulgaria consider digitization to be of crucial importance for the development of successful operations2.

There is no doubt that the digitization of SMEs is a crucial mechanism for achieving competitiveness and economic success not only for individual enterprises but also for our country as a whole. As the practical importance of digitization continues to grow, so does the number of scientific research studies and publications dedicated to it. However, despite this increase, numerous essential aspects of this process within SMEs remain unresolved or is not sufficiently well-developed. Among these are the issues related to clarifying the fundamental factors hindering (barriers) the digitization of SMEs in our country.

Based on the results of the study of V. Petrova (2021) regarding the artificial intelligence (AI) in digital enterprises, in the initial years the patent activity increases in recent years – in 2018, 2019 and 2020. Applicants for patents in the field of artificial intelligence and education are mainly Chinese individuals and legal entities. Digital businesses need to make significant changes to their patent policy. For a digital enterprise to be successful, it must invest in the creation of technological developments in the field of artificial intelligence, which will receive patent protection. Regarding the Bulgarian business environment, it should be noted that digital enterprises do not create innovative products in the field of artificial intelligence to be protected by a patent for an invention (Petrova 2021).

Given this context, the aim of this publication is to provide a brief overview of the generalized results from an analysis of the level of digitization in SMEs in Bulgaria, along with a study of the key factors hindering its further development, acting as barriers. These results can be valuable for guiding the efforts of managers and government entities in stimulating the digitization development in SMEs.

1. Methodological Section

To obtain the presented results and conclusions, an initial analysis of the level of digitization in SMEs in the country was conducted. This analysis involved researching and systematizing results from published studies by both domestic and foreign organizations. Subsequently, an author-conducted survey among Bulgarian SMEs was carried out to clarify their perspectives on the barriers hindering their digitization.

The survey was conducted at the end of 2023 through the collection of empirical data via a questionnaire distributed to the selected sample of Bulgarian SMEs. Aspecialized research methodology was employed (Velev, Tsvetanova, Veleva 2019), and data processing and analysis were performed using statistical methods and specialized software. The study encompassed gathering opinions from owners and managers, and when not feasible, lower-level managers were included in the survey.

The sampled businesses included 100 micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises from various sectors within the manufacturing industry. To facilitate comparisons of opinions among leaders of enterprises of different sizes, 69 micro-enterprises, 22 small enterprises, and 9 medium-sized enterprises were studied. This distribution corresponds to the established distribution of SMEs in the country as a whole.

The main research hypotheses were:

a) Digitization in SMEs is hindered by strongly influencing financial factors. b) Digitization in SMEs is impeded by a lack of adequately trained personnel. c) Barriers to digitization are higher in smaller-sized enterprises.

While the surveyed sample of SMEs may not be fully representative of the country as a whole, the obtained results are indicative of the challenges facing their digitization processes. These findings can be valuable in directing the efforts of responsible government entities to support the development of SMEs.

2. State of Digitization in SMEs in Bulgaria

Bulgaria ranks 26th out of the 27 EU member states in terms of integrating digital technologies into businesses, according to the European Commission’s Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) for 2022. Despite an average annual increase of 9% over the last five years, the adoption of digital technologies by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Bulgaria is nearly half of the EU average. Only 6% of Bulgarian enterprises use big data, 10% use cloud services, and 3% use artificial intelligence (AI), compared to the EU targets of 75% for each technology by 20303. The report also notes that our country lags behind in the share of its workforce in ICT specialists (3.5% compared to the EU average of 4.5%). Only in the field of connectivity do we achieve a very good result.

The coverage of optical lines to buildings is provided for 85% of households, compared to 50% in the EU. The offered prices are relatively low, but the overall adoption of fixed and mobile broadband internet access remains low.

According to a World Bank report, Bulgarian firms have the lowest level of digital intensity among all EU countries, indicating a significant lag in the adoption of digital technologies. More than 50% of SMEs have a very low digital intensity index, measuring the overall use of technologies by enterprises. Our country has the lowest share of firms with a high index of digital intensity – only 16%, compared to the EU average of 29%. This places Bulgarian SMEs at the bottom in terms of digitization in the region, and this conclusion is valid for all sizes of firms and sectors4.

The report also notes that only half of Bulgarian SMEs have a website, which is the fourth-lowest share among EU countries. Most enterprises do not use social media for business purposes, which is 25% less than the EU average. All of this hinders online visibility and interaction with customers. Furthermore, only one in eight Bulgarian SMEs sells its products or services online, which is below 50% of the EU average.

A report from PricewaterhouseCoopers Bulgaria indicates that there has been a comprehensive improvement in the use of ICT among SMEs over the past decade. However, currently, only 13.7% of enterprises have a fairly high or very high level of ICT activity, while smaller enterprises continue to have a relatively lower level of ICT usage compared to larger enterprises5.

In the World Bank report, it is indicated that Bulgarian SMEs typically do not utilize advanced technologies but rather prefer elementary and moderately advanced technologies for performing common daily tasks. These technologies are primarily applied to address administrative tasks, including those related to accounting and human resources, as well as for utilizing online banking services, financial transactions, and similar activities. Bulgarian SMEs heavily rely on paper invoices and exhibit limited acceptance of electronic invoices. Only 16% of them send electronic invoices, hindering online business transactions and indicating a low level of digitization in their business processes.

A similar perspective is supported by the European Commission’s Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI), which highlights that only 25% of SMEs in Bulgaria have at least a basic level of digital intensity. They lag behind in online sales as well, with only 10% of SMEs conducting such transactions, approximately half of the EU average. These findings align with the results of a study conducted by the Bulgarian Small and Medium Enterprises Promotion Agency (BSMEPA), revealing that merely 8% of Bulgarian SMEs engage in online sales, contributing a mere 3% to their total turnover. This discrepancy is also evident among enterprises with a website (51%) and those sending electronic invoices (10%), in contrast to the EU average of 76% and 35%, respectively6.

The World Bank report reveals that the adoption of modern digital tools, such as CRM and ERP systems, among Bulgarian SMEs is relatively low compared to the EU average. The use of CRM systems, which facilitate the capture, storage, and accessibility of customer information in organizations, as well as the analysis of such data for marketing purposes, is 21% lower in Bulgaria. Similarly, the utilization of ERP software is 42% below the EU average. Additionally, the use of big data analytics, both internal and external, is below the EU average, indicating untapped potential for data-driven decision-making. Bulgarian SMEs exhibit limited adoption of cloud computing services, ranking lower than most countries in the region.

Overall, only one in ten firms in Bulgaria does not frequently use digital tools in at least one business function. However, only one-third of SMEs leverage the most advanced technologies available to them on a daily basis7.

According to the DESI index for 2022, our country significantly lags behind the EU average in terms of digital skills, ranking 26th out of 27 EU member states. The percentage of individuals possessing at least basic digital skills is only 31%, compared to the EU average of 54%. Moreover, the share of those with digital skills beyond the basic level is lower than the EU average, with a substantial difference of 8% (compared to the EU average of 26%). This indicates a considerable gap in achieving the EU’s goal for 2030, where 80% of adults are expected to have at least basic digital skills.

In 2020, only 7% of businesses provided ICT training for their personnel, significantly below the EU average of 20%. However, Bulgaria demonstrates positive outcomes regarding women in ICT professions, constituting 28% of all ICT specialists compared to the EU average of 19%. Simultaneously, the proportion of individuals with higher education in the ICT field is also high in Bulgaria8.

3. Barriers to the Digitization of Bulgarian SMEs

The presented results from the conducted research are generalized for the entire population of examined SMEs. This is necessary due to the limitations in the scope of the current study.

Initially, it was found that a very small fraction (around 8%) of SME managers have a clear understanding of the digitization process and its scope. A significant portion of managers (91%) associate this process with the use of computers for carrying out elementary, daily activities. At the same time, almost all surveyed managers are convinced of the benefits and objective necessity of digitizing their businesses. Only 9% of them state that their business cannot be digitized or that they do not wish for it.

The survey revealed that digitization in SMEs is most commonly defined as a means of online information retrieval and exchange, maintaining accounting records, electronic invoicing, and data storage for daily operations. Only a small portion of managers connect it with a higher level of digitization of core business processes and a transformation of business models (Veleva, Tsvetanova 2020).

The obtained results exhibit significant variations across SMEs of different sizes. In line with the main objective of the study, factors hindering the adoption and development of digitization in SMEs were examined. The following table presents the averaged ratings from respondents, representing all surveyed enterprise groups, regarding the strength of the negative impact of these factors. Ratings for the negative influence of the factors are on a 7-point scale, where a score of 1 indicates very weak negative influence on the process, and the maximum score of 7 signifies a very strong impact.

Factors hindering digitization in SMEs

FactorsMicro companiesSmall companiesMedium CompaniesNegativeimpactassessment(from 1 –very weakto 7 – verystrong)Order bystrengthofnegativeimpactNegativeimpactassessment(from 1 –very weakto 7 – verystrong)Order bystrengthofnegativeimpactNegativeimpactassessment(from 1 –very weakto 7 – verystrong)Order bystrengthofnegativeimpact1Huge risk ofbusiness failure4,75124,70134,20122Lack of interest6,7254,30153,70163Insu󰀩cientspeed andcrashes on theInternet3,0163,90164,10134Very high costs6,9026,4036,3035Insu󰀩cientnancialcapabilities.6,9516,3545,8056Lack of suitablefunding sources6,7546,0064,7097Organizationalobstacles4,60134,50144,60108Low digitalculture and sta󰀨skills6,7066,5026,3529Lack of qualiedIT sta󰀨6,8036,6516,40110Internalresistance tochange4,40144,80124,001411Lack ofinformationabout moderndigital andtechnologies6,2085,2593,801512Risk of hackerattacks6,1096,3056,20413Risk of loss ofcontrol4,80115,20105,50714Insu󰀩cientsupport from thestate6,4075,8075,108
15Possibledependence onIT specialists4,90105,385,55616Rapidobsolescenceof digitaltechnologies4,2154,85114,5011

The results presented in the table indicate that the operational environment strongly negatively impacts the digitization process of SMEs. This holds true for all three groups of SMEs, with a clear intensification of the negative impact as the size of enterprises increases. It is evident that the significance of factors with negative impacts varies depending on the size of SMEs.

For instance, according to the assessments of surveyed managers from microenterprises, the most substantial hindrances to digitization are the insufficient financial capabilities of the enterprises and the high costs associated with digitalization. In the third position for negative impact is the lack of qualified IT personnel, a serious issue even for larger SMEs. Generally, factors related to costs, financing, and the absence of suitable digital culture and skills in the workforce are at the forefront of inhibiting digitization. The fifth-ranked factor, the lack of interest in implementing digitization elements, suggests that managers themselves may lack the necessary qualifications and understanding of the benefits of digitization. Lastly, for micro-enterprises, potential issues with the internet are ranked least significant.

Financial factors once again rank high in terms of negative impact, even for smaller enterprises. However, for both small and medium-sized enterprises, the top two factors with the most inhibiting impact on digitization are “Lack of qualified IT personnel” and “Low digital culture and skills of the staff.” These two factors hold the first two positions for medium-sized enterprises as well. For both small and mediumsized enterprises, it is noticeable that the factor “Lack of interest in digitization” is placed at the end of the ranking, providing optimism for their development.

Clearly, the lack of funds, high expected expenses, and issues with staff qualifications are the primary obstacles to digitization for SMEs. According to the respondents, the lack of sufficient support from the state has also significantly hindered digitization in enterprises.

The results obtained from the study provide confirmation for the main research hypotheses, namely: a) digitization of SMEs is impeded by strongly acting financial factors; b) digitization of SMEs is hindered by a lack of qualified personnel; c) barriers to digitization are greater for smaller-sized enterprises.

Conclusion

Digitization is crucial for companies due to its multifaceted impact on various aspects of business operations. By enhancing operational efficiency through process automation and minimizing errors, digitalization streamlines workflows. This, in turn, leads to significant cost reductions, as companies can optimize resource utilization and decrease reliance on physical infrastructure.

Moreover, digital tools contribute to enhanced productivity and flexibility within the workforce. Seamless collaboration, quick access to information, and the ability for employees to work remotely become achievable, fostering a dynamic and efficient working environment. Considering this, the publication briefly presented the achieved level of digitization in Bulgarian SMEs, as well as summarized the results of the study on the main factors hindering it.

The obtained results showed that digitization of Bulgarian SMEs faces several barriers. The main ones are related to financial problems and a lack of qualified personnel, as well as the overall negative impact of the operating environment. This signals the need for state support – financial support, workforce training, etc.

Companies require training for digitalization to ensure that their workforce possesses the necessary skills and competencies to effectively leverage digital tools and technologies.

The trainings are an investment in human capital that ensures employees are equipped with the skills and knowledge necessary to navigate the digital landscape, contributing to the overall success of a company’s digitalization efforts.

Various national and European-level programs are available for the companies in this direction, and they should be utilized to enhance their performance. The digitization of SMEs should be considered a shared aspiration of the private and public sectors for the development of a modern and competitive economy, especially in the context of companies’ internationalization.

The developments in this publication could serve as a basis for further discussion on the identified issues and be useful for directing the efforts of state authorities and managers to stimulate the development of SMEs, particularly in their digitization efforts.

NOTES

1. State of Small and Medium Enterprises in Bulgaria, Development and Trends in Times of Challenges, Bulgarian Small and Medium Enterprises Promotion Agency (BSMEPA), January 2023 – https://www.sme.government.bg/uploads/2023/03/ДОКЛАД_МСП-2022.pdf.

2. Аvailable at: source: https://www.tbmagazine.net/statia/digitalizaciya-e-ot-klyuchovo-znachenie-za-razvitie-spored-23-ot-blgarskite-predpriyatiya)

3. European Commission, Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) for 2022.

4. Gaps and Opportunities: State of Firms’ Digitalization in Bulgaria, Poland, and Slovakia Digitrans Project – Output 2. Country-specific reports on Programs, Institutions and Barriers, 2023, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank.

5 . Technical report, including in-depth analysis of SMEs in Bulgaria and preliminary recommendations for the action directions of the new strategy, project “National Strategy for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises for the period 2021— 2027 in Bulgaria” with the beneficiary Ministry of Economy and financed by DG “REFORM,” PricewaterhouseCoopers Bulgaria.

6. European Commission, DESI 2022; BSMEPA, 2022.

7. Gaps and Opportunities: State of Firms’ Digitalization in Bulgaria, Poland, and Slovakia, 2023.

8. European Commission, DESI for 2022.

REFERENCES

STOYANOVA, P., 2023. Digital Business and Intellectual Property. Intellectual Property and Business Journal, vol. 3, pp. 60 – 65. Sofia: UNWE. ISNN 2815-3464.

PETROVA, V., 2021. Artificial Intelligence Patents in Digital Enterprises. The Future of Education International Conference, Florence, Italy, 1 – 2 July 2021, Filodiritto Publisher.

KRUSHKOV, N., 2020. Security Leadership Creativity. Sofia: Publishing Complex-UNWE.

VELEVA, S.; TSVETANOVA, A., 2020., Business Model Innovation. Sofia: Softtrade Publishing. ISBN 978-954-334-230-3, (in Bulgarian).

VELEV, M.; TSVETANOVA, A.; VELEVA, S., 2019. Study of the Determinants of the Enterprise’s Capacity to Absorb New Technologies. Economic Studies journal, Sofia: Economic Research Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.

2025 година
Книжка 6
UNLOCKING THE POTENTIAL OF ESG AND AI IN HIGHER EDUCATION FINANCE: INSIGHTS FROM A STUDY ACROSS FIVE EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

Tina Vukasović, Rok Strašek, Liliya Terzieva;, Elenita Velikova, Justyna Tomala, Maria Urbaniec, Jarosław Pawlik, Michael Murg, Anita Maček

THE ROLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION FOR THE PROFESSIONAL REALIZATION OF STUDENTS – PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS

Anny Atanasova, Viktoriya Kalaydzhieva, Radostina Yuleva-Chuchulayna, Kalina Durova-Angelova

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
ТРАНСФОРМАЦИИ НА ПАЗАРА НА ТРУДА И НУЖДАТА ОТ ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИ РЕФОРМИ

Ваня Иванова, Андрей Василев, Калоян Ганев, Ралица Симеонова-Ганева

Книжка 3
FORMING ENTREPRENEURIAL CULTURE THROUGH EDUCATION

Milena Filipova, Adriana Atanasova

Книжка 2s
THE STATE OF INCLUSION IN ADAPTED BASKETBALL

Stefka Djobova, Ivelina Kirilova

Книжка 2
MODEL OF PROFESSIONALLY DIRECTED TRAINING OF FUTURE ENGINEER-TEACHERS

Ivan Beloev, Valentina Vasileva, Іnna Savytska, Oksana Bulgakova, Lesia Zbaravska, Olha Chaikovska

DETERMINANTS AFFECTING ACADEMIC STAFF SATISFACTION WITH ONLINE LEARNING IN HIGHER MEDICAL EDUCATION

Miglena Tarnovska, ;, Rumyana Stoyanova, ;, Angelina Kirkova-Bogdanova;, Rositsa Dimova

Книжка 1s
AN INNOVATIVE MODEL FOR DEVELOPING DIGITAL COMPETENCES OF SOCIAL WORKERS

Lyudmila Vekova, Tanya Vazova, Penyo Georgiev, Ekaterina Uzhikanova-Kovacheva

Книжка 1
2024 година
Книжка 6s
DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES RISK MANAGEMENT

Miglena Molhova-Vladova, Ivaylo B. Ivanov

Книжка 6
AN INTEGRATIVE APPROACH TO ORGANIZING THE FORMATION OF STUDENTS’ COGNITIVE INDEPENDENCE IN CONDITIONS OF INTENSIFICATION OF LEARNING ACTIVITIES

Albina Volkotrubova, Aidai Kasymova, Zoriana Hbur, Antonina Kichuk, Svitlana Koshova, Svitlana Khodakivska

ИНОВАТИВЕН МОДЕЛ НА ПРОЕКТНО БАЗИРАНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ НА ГИМНАЗИАЛНИ УЧИТЕЛИ: ДОБРА ПРАКТИКА ОТ УниБИТ

Жоржета Назърска, Александър Каракачанов, Магдалена Гарванова, Нина Дебрюне

Книжка 5s
КОНЦЕПТУАЛНА РАМКА ЗА ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА ИЗКУСТВЕНИЯ ИНТЕЛЕКТ ВЪВ ВИСШЕТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Акад. Христо Белоев, Валентина Войноховска, Ангел Смрикаров

ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ ПРИЛОЖИМОСТТА НА БЛОКОВИ ВЕРИГИ ОТ ПЪРВО НИВО (L1) В СИСТЕМА ЗА ЕЛЕКТРОННО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Андриан Минчев, Ваня Стойкова, Галя Шивачева, Доц Анелия Иванова

ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВА ПРИ ПРОМЯНА НА ПЛАТФОРМИ ЗА ДИСТАНЦИОННО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Антон Недялков, Милена Кирова, Мирослава Бонева

APPLICATION OF ZSPACE TECHNOLOGY IN THE DISCIPLINES OF THE STEM CYCLE

Boyana Ivanova, Kamelia Shoilekova, Desislava Atanasova, Rumen Rusev

TEACHERS' ADAPTATION TO CHANGES IN AN INCREASINGLY COMPLEX WORLD THROUGH THE USE OF AI

Zhanat Nurbekova, Kanagat Baigusheva, Kalima Tuenbaeva, Bakyt Nurbekov, Tsvetomir Vassilev

АТОСЕКУНДНОТО ОБУЧЕНИЕ – МЕТАФОРА НА ДНЕШНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Юлия Дончева, Денис Асенов, Ангел Смрикаров, Цветомир Василев

Книжка 5
Книжка 4s
Книжка 4
MANAGERIAL ASPECTS OF COOPERATION AMONG HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THEIR STAKEHOLDERS

Olha Prokopenko, Svitlana Perova, Tokhir Rakhimov, Mykola Kunytskyi, Iryna Leshchenko

Книжка 3s
Книжка 3
Книжка 2
FORMATION OF PROFESSIONAL SKILLS OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERS DURING LABORATORY PRACTICE WHEN STUDYING FUNDAMENTAL SCIENCE

Ivan Beloev, Oksana Bulgakova, Oksana Zakhutska, Maria Bondar, Lesia Zbaravska

ИМИДЖ НА УНИВЕРСИТЕТА

Галя Христозова

Книжка 1s
COMPETITIVENESS AS A RESULT OF CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION

Nikolay Krushkov, Ralitza Zayakova-Krushkova

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND SECURITY IN THE INTEGRATED CIRCUITS INDUSTRY

Ivan Nachev, Yuliana Tomova, Iskren Konstantinov, Marina Spasova

Книжка 1
PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Milena Filipova, Olha Prokopenko, Igor Matyushenko, Olena Khanova, Olga Shirobokova, Ardian Durmishi

2023 година
Книжка 6s
DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMON INFORMATION SYSTEM TO CREATE A DIGITAL CAREER CENTER TOGETHER WITH PARTNER HIGHER SCHOOLS

Yordanka Angelova, Rossen Radonov, Vasil Kuzmov, Stela Zhorzh Derelieva-Konstantinova

DRAFTING A DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION STRATEGY FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT SECTOR – EMPIRICAL STUDY ON UAE

Mounir el Khatib, Shikha al Ali, Ibrahim Alharam, Ali Alhajeri, Gabriela Peneva, Jordanka Angelova, Mahmoud Shanaa

VOYAGE OF LEARNING: CRUISE SHIPS WEATHER ROUTING AND MARITIME EDUCATION

Svetlana Dimitrakieva, Dobrin Milev, Christiana Atanasova

СТРУКТУРНИ ПРОМЕНИ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО НА МЕНИДЖЪРИ ЗА ИНДУСТРИЯ 5.0

Недко Минчев, Венета Христова, Иван Стоянов

RESEARCH OF THE INNOVATION CAPACITY OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS

Siya Veleva, ; Margarita Mondeshka, Anka Tsvetanova

Книжка 6
Книжка 5s
ВИДОВЕ ТРАВМИ В ПАРАШУТИЗМА И ПРЕВЕНЦИЯТА ИМ

Капитан III ранг Георги Калинов

Книжка 5
Книжка 4s
DETERMINING THE DEGREE OF DIGITALIZATION OF A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION

Acad. Hristo Beloev, Angel Smrikarov, Valentina Voinohovska, Galina Ivanova

ОТ STEM КЪМ BEST: ДВА СТАНДАРТА, ЕДНА ЦЕЛ

Андрей Захариев, Стефан Симеонов, Таня Тодорова

Книжка 4
EFFECT OF RESILIENCE ON BURNOUT IN ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

Radina Stoyanova, Sonya Karabeliova, Petya Pandurova, Nadezhda Zheckova, Kaloyan Mitev

Книжка 3s
INTELLIGENT ANIMAL HUSBANDRY: FARMER ATTITUDES AND A ROADMAP FOR IMPLEMENTATION

Dimitrios Petropoulos, Koutroubis Fotios, Petya Biolcheva, Evgeni Valchev

Книжка 3
STUDY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE USE OF COMMUNICATIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS OF ENGINEERS TRAINING

Ivan Beloev, Valentina Vasileva, Sergii Bilan, Maria Bondar, Oksana Bulgakova, Lyubov Shymko

Книжка 2
РАЗПОЛОЖЕНИЕ НА ВИСШИТЕ УЧИЛИЩА В БЪЛГАРИЯ В КОНТЕКСТА НА ФОРМИРАНЕ НА ПАЗАРА НА ТРУДА

Цветелина Берберова-Вълчева, Камен Петров, Николай Цонков

Книжка 1
MODERNIZATION OF THE CONTENT OF THE LECTURE COURSE IN PHYSICS FOR TRAINING FUTURE AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERS

Ivan Beloev, Valentina Vasileva, Vasyl Shynkaruk, Oksana Bulgakova, Maria Bondar, Lesia Zbaravska, Sergii Slobodian

2022 година
Книжка 6
ORGANIZATION OF AN INCLUSIVE EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT FOR THE STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS

Halyna Bilavych, Nataliia Bakhmat, Tetyana Pantiuk, Mykola Pantiuk, Borys Savchuk

ДИГИТАЛИЗАЦИЯ НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО В БЪЛГАРИЯ: СЪСТОЯНИЕ И ОБЩИ ТЕНДЕНЦИИ

Теодора Върбанова, Албена Вуцова, Николай Нетов

Книжка 5
ПРАВОТО НА ИЗБОР В ЖИВОТА НА ДЕЦАТА В РЕПУБЛИКА БЪЛГАРИЯ

Сийка Чавдарова-Костова, Даниела Рачева, Екатерина Томова, Росица Симеонова

Книжка 4
DIAGNOSIS AS A TOOL FOR MONITORING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ADDICTION PREVENTION IN ADOLESCENTS

O.A. Selivanova, N.V. Bystrova, I.I. Derecha, T.S. Mamontova, O.V. Panfilova

Книжка 3
ПУБЛИЧНОТО РАЗБИРАНЕ НА НАУКАТА В МРЕЖОВИЯ СВЯТ

Светломир Здравков, Мартин Й. Иванов, Петя Климентова

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
ДИГИТАЛНАТА ИНТЕРАКЦИЯ ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛ – СТУДЕНТ В ОНЛАЙН ОБУЧЕНИЕТО В МЕДИЦИНСКИТЕ УНИВЕРСИТЕТИ

Миглена Търновска, Румяна Стоянова, Боряна Парашкевова, Юлияна Маринова

2021 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
Книжка 4s
SIGNAL FOR HELP

Ina Vladova, Milena Kuleva

Книжка 4
PREMISES FOR A MULTICULTURAL APPROACH TO EDUCATION

Anzhelina Koriakina, Lyudmila Amanbaeva

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
ПЪРВА СЕДМИЦА ДИСТАНЦИОННО ОБУЧЕНИЕ В СУ „ИВАН ВАЗОВ“ В СТАРА ЗАГОРА

Тони Чехларова, Динко Цвятков, Неда Чехларова

Книжка 1
METHODOLOGY OF SAFETY AND QUALITY OF LIFE ON THE BASIS OF NOOSPHERIC EDUCATION SYSTEM FORMATION

Nataliia Bakhmat, Nataliia Ridei, Nataliia Tytova, Vladyslava Liubarets, Oksana Katsero

2020 година
Книжка 6
HIGHER EDUCATION AS A PUBLIC GOOD

Yulia Nedelcheva, Miroslav Nedelchev

Книжка 5
НАСЪРЧАВАНЕ НА СЪТРУДНИЧЕСТВОТО МЕЖДУ ВИСШИТЕ УЧИЛИЩА И БИЗНЕСА

Добринка Стоянова, Блага Маджурова, Гергана Димитрова, Стефан Райчев

Книжка 4
THE STRATEGY OF HUMAN RIGHTS STUDY IN EDUCATION

Anush Balian, Nataliya Seysebayeva, Natalia Efremova, Liliia Danylchenko

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
МИГРАЦИЯ И МИГРАЦИОННИ ПРОЦЕСИ

Веселина Р. Иванова

SOCIAL STATUS OF DISABLED PEOPLE IN RUSSIA

Elena G. Pankova, Tatiana V. Soloveva, Dinara A. Bistyaykina, Olga M. Lizina

Книжка 1
ETHNIC UPBRINGING AS A PART OF THE ETHNIC CULTURE

Sholpankulova Gulnar Kenesbekovna

2019 година
Книжка 6
EMOTIONAL COMPETENCE OF THE SOCIAL TEACHER

Kadisha K. Shalgynbayeva, Ulbosin Zh.Tuyakova

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
УЧИЛИЩЕТО НА БЪДЕЩЕТО

Наталия Витанова

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
POST-GRADUATE QUALIFICATION OF TEACHERS IN INTERCULTURAL EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT

Irina Koleva, Veselin Tepavicharov, Violeta Kotseva, Kremena Yordanova

ДЕЦАТА В КОНСТИТУЦИОННИТЕ НОРМИ НА БЪЛГАРИЯ

Румен Василев, Весела Марева

СЪСТОЯНИЕ НА БЪЛГАРСКОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Анелия Любенова, Любомир Любенов

ЕДИН НОВ УЧЕБНИК

Ирина Колева

2018 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
A NEW AWARD FOR PROFESSOR MAIRA KABAKOVA

Irina Koleva, Editor-in-

Книжка 4
Книжка 3
BLENDED EDUCATION IN HIGHER SCHOOLS: NEW NETWORKS AND MEDIATORS

Nikolay Tsankov, Veska Gyuviyska, Milena Levunlieva

ВЗАИМОВРЪЗКАТА МЕЖДУ СПОРТА И ПРАВОТО

Ивайло Прокопов, Елица Стоянова

ХИМЕРНИТЕ ГРУПИ В УЧИЛИЩЕ

Яна Рашева-Мерджанова

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2017 година
Книжка 6
ЗНАЧИМОСТТА НА УЧЕНЕТО: АНАЛИЗ НА ВРЪЗКИТЕ МЕЖДУ ГЛЕДНИТЕ ТОЧКИ НА УЧЕНИЦИ, РОДИТЕЛИ И УЧИТЕЛИ

Илиана Мирчева, Елена Джамбазова, Снежана Радева, Деян Велковски

Книжка 5
ОРГАНИЗАЦИОННА КУЛТУРА В УЧИЛИЩЕ

Ивайло Старибратов, Лилия Бабакова

Книжка 4
КОУЧИНГ. ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЕН КОУЧИНГ

Наталия Витанова, Нели Митева

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
ЕМПАТИЯ И РЕФЛЕКСИЯ

Нели Кънева, Кристиана Булдеева

2016 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2015 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
Книжка 4
ПРАГМАТИЧНАТА ДИДАКТИКА

Николай Колишев

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2014 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
КОХЕРЕНТНОСТ НА ПОЛИТИКИ

Албена Вуцова, Лиляна Павлова

Книжка 4
USING THE RESULTS OF A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT

Thomas Kellaghan, Vincent Greaney, T. Scott Murray

Книжка 3
USING THE RESULTS OF A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT

Thomas Kellaghan, Vincent Greaney, T. Scott Murray

Книжка 2
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF UNIVERSITY FACULTY: А SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS

Gulnar Toltaevna Balakayeva, Alken Shugaybekovich Tokmagambetov, Sapar Imangalievich Ospanov

USING THE RESULTS OF A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT

Thomas Kellaghan, Vincent Greaney, T. Scott Murray

Книжка 1
РЕФЛЕКСИЯТА В ИНТЕГРАТИВНОТО ПОЛЕ НА МЕТОДИКАТА НА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО ПО БИОЛОГИЯ

Иса Хаджиали, Наташа Цанова, Надежда Райчева, Снежана Томова

USING THE RESULTS OF A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT

Thomas Kellaghan, Vincent Greaney, T. Scott Murray

2013 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
Книжка 4
QUESTIONNAIRE DEVELOPMENT

ÎÖÅÍßÂÀÍÅÒÎ

Книжка 3
MASS MEDIA CULTURE IN KAZAKHSTAN

Aktolkyn Kulsariyeva Yerkin Massanov Indira Alibayeva

РЪКОВОДСТВО ЗА СЪСТАВЯНЕ НА ТЕСТОВЕ*

Фернандо Картрайт, Джери Мусио

РОССИЙСКАЯ СИСТЕМА ОЦЕНКИ КАЧЕСТВА ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ: ГЛАВНЫЕ УРОКИ

В. Болотов / И. Вальдман / Г. Ковалёва / М. Пинская

Книжка 2
ОЦЕНЯВАНЕ НА ГРАЖДАНСКИТЕ КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТИ НА УЧЕНИЦИТЕ: ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВА И ВЪЗМОЖНОСТИ

Светла Петрова Център за контрол и оценка на качеството на училищното образование

РЪКОВОДСТВО ЗА СЪСТАВЯНЕ НА ТЕСТОВЕ*

Фернандо Картрайт, Джери Мусио

Книжка 1
Уважаеми читатели,

вет, както и от международния борд за предоставените статии и студии, за да могат да бъдат идентифицирани в полето на образованието пред широката аудитория от педа- гогически специалисти във всички степени на образователната ни система. Благодаря за техния всеотдаен и безвъзмезден труд да създават и популяризират мрежа от научни съобщества по профила на списанието и да насърчават научните изследвания. Благодаря на рецензентите от национално представените висши училища, на- учни институции и

РЪКОВОДСТВО ЗА СЪСТАВЯНЕ НА ТЕСТОВЕ

Фернандо Картрайт, Джери Мусио

2012 година
Книжка 6
DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE IN KAZAKHSTAN IN THE PERIOD OF INDEPENDENCE

Aigerim Mynbayeva Maira Kabakova Aliya Massalimova

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
СИСТЕМАТА ЗА РАЗВИТИЕ НА АКАДЕМИЧНИЯ СЪСТАВ НА РУСЕНСКИЯ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ „АНГЕЛ КЪНЧЕВ“

Христо Белоев, Ангел Смрикаров, Орлин Петров, Анелия Иванова, Галина Иванова

Книжка 2
ПРОУЧВАНЕ НА РОДИТЕЛСКОТО УЧАСТИЕ В УЧИЛИЩНИЯ ЖИВОТ В БЪЛГАРИЯ

* Този материал е изготвен въз основа на резултатите от изследването „Parental Involvement in Life of School Matters“, проведено в България в рамките на проек- та „Advancing Educational Inclusion and Quality in South East Europe“, изпълняван

ВТОРИ ФОРУМ ЗА СТРАТЕГИИ В НАУКАТА

Тошка Борисова В края на 2011 г. в София се проведе второто издание на Форум за страте- гии в науката. Основната тема бе повишаване на международната видимост и разпознаваемост на българската наука. Форумът се организира от „Elsevier“ – водеща компания за разработване и предоставяне на научни, технически и медицински информационни продукти и услуги , с подкрепата на Министер- ството на образованието, младежта и науката. След успеха на първото издание на Форума за стратегии в науката през

Книжка 1
РЕЙТИНГИ, ИНДЕКСИ, ПАРИ

Боян Захариев