Стратегии на образователната и научната политика

2023/3s, стр. 90 - 103

PRE-INCUBATION TOOLKITS FOR ACADEMIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP FOSTERING: BULGARIAN CASE

Резюме:

Ключови думи:

1. Introduction: literature preview of the academic entrepreneurship background

Entrepreneurship and entrepreneur are explained as the heart and blood system of the contemporary economy. We have a lot of examples of people that succeeded as entrepreneurs and their entrepreneurial business is worthy not just for themselves but for society as well.

Researchers appoint the very first understanding of economic thoughts and business economics backward to the first economic theories. Thus, the recent business economics and understanding of economic development are grounded in the first economists (see. Cantillon, A.Smith, H. Devenport, F. Taylor, H. Fayol, J. Schumpeter and others) (Sterev and Penchev 2023). Accordingly, Hbert and Link (1989) summarize that “The entrepreneur is a person, not a team, committee or organization. …. Entrepreneurial actions are performed in all societies by individuals whose judgement diers from the norm”.

As the common concept of entrepreneurship is strongly grounded to business activities, there could be found different “places” to find out entrepreneurs. As the focus of business economics changed from commodities (resp. land and machinery) via humans (resp. labor) to information and intellectual outputs, the role of the “intellectual properties’ owner” become more and more important for entrepreneurial development recently. Thus, the entrepreneurs’ foundation is messed out from “regular” business as practical invention centers to universities as knowledge creation centers. Accordingly, business entrepreneurship converts to academic entrepreneurship nowadays.

Academic entrepreneurship is not a new topic but it has been re-invented last decade. As the very first publication that gives the role of the universities to facilitating the entrepreneurship process (Lamont, 1972) the academic interest is focused on researching the entrepreneurs’ background and the role of the Universities in training entrepreneurs for more than 30 years. Therefore, the very first role of the Universities in supporting entrepreneurship is to train entrepreneurs.

In 2002, Huffman and Quigley set the role of the Universities to attract hightech entrepreneurs through: “network events”, internships, business scholarships, and business incubators. Following Toole and Czarnitzki (2007) academic entrepreneurship is defined as a form of technology transfer. In that meaning, the academic entrepreneur is a researcher / scientific investigator that takes part in the commercialization of an originated technology. Furthermore, Feldman et al. (2002) found a connection between the commercialization of the intellectual property of American Universities and equity instruments for Technology transfer (as the first step to fostering academic entrepreneurship – a.n.).

The summary of the role of the universities to provide an academic environment that may serve as a catalyst for high-technology start-ups is given by Franke and Leuthje (2004) and Vutsova and Yalamov (2023). Furthermore, Vedovello and Godinho (2003) found that one of the main instruments for enforcing entrepreneurship is to support (academic) business incubators as they mainly support entrepreneurs and the so-called academic entrepreneurs. Some of the main mechanisms for positive linkage between universities and entrepreneurship are based on technology transfer opportunities (Table 1).

Table 1. Technology transfer mechanisms in universities

Process mechanisms –servicesProcess mechanisms –organizational arrangementsOutput mechanismsConsultation / Expert servicesCenters of excellence / High-techcentersCongresses, workshops,seminarsContinuing EducationInnovation centers, businessincubators, research parksDoctoral theses, Masterstheses
Contract ResearchTechnology transfer oces/TTOs/Patents, licensesPostgraduate education /Undergraduate educationResearch databasesResearch ProjectsScientific publicationsResearch laboratories andsponsored (business) researchTeachers / Student exchange

Source: based on Autio, E. and Laamanen, T., 1995. Measurement and evaluation of technology transfer: review of technology transfer mechanisms and indicators. Int. J. Technology Management, Vol. 10, No. 7/8, pp.643 – 664. In: Vedovello & Godinho (2003). In summary, academic entrepreneurship covers different players: teachers, researchers, students, and university administration staff that are involved in different university processes (training process, research process, expertise process) and have high intention to academic-business results (e.g. patenting, licensing, scientific publication and etc.) by organizational help provision through: center of excellences, TTOs and etc.

2. Entrepreneurial development stages: pre-incubation stage

Adopting Witt and Zellner (2005) to become an academic entrepreneur it is the migration of academic persons (researchers, teachers, students) as a co

Figure 1. Valley of start-up death

Source: Osawa and Miyazaki, 2006 founder a technology-oriented start-up firm based on knowledge transfer from academic / public to the business sphere. But, as many researchers found just 3 – 5 % of academicians succeed nevertheless more than 25-28% to have an intent for starting up their “academic” business.

Furthermore, entrepreneurial training is the first step of recognition of the academic entrepreneurs. Thus, the traditional entrepreneurial education could be

Table 2. Content of pre-incubation entrepreneurial training

A. 21-session social entrepreneurship training1–2Mutual acquaintanceand teambuildingWithsimulationgamesandexercisesHelpedyoung people understandthemselves, including their characterstrengths andpersonality, and reviewtheir career interests, planning, andorientation-Team work activities-Self-understanding andreview-Career interests and orientation3–6Entrepreneurship knowledge and skillsWith start-upsandsuccessfulcases’sharingTaught them entrepreneurshipknowledgeand skills,includingeconomic and job market analysis,businessset-upanddevelopmentstrategies, business administration,finance andhuman resourcesmanagement,business innovation,andrisk taking-Economic and job market-Business set-up and development-Administration,finance,and humanresources-Businessinnovationand risk taking710Entrepreneurship training-Concept, knowledge, attitudes, andvalues-Entrepreneurialproblemanalysis-Needs and problemsof people-Innovativebusinessplanswithsocialand economic goals1115AgencyvisitsOutdoorvisitsocial entrepreneurs’sharing ontheconcept and their experience in usingtheirbusinessesto solve varioussocialproblems-3D printing firm, VRandARtechnologyfirm,wastesrecyclingcompany, organic farming,appswriting laboratory1620Businessplan developmentWithmentorshipsupportandguidanceto develop a business planthat isfinancially sustainableandconceptually contributory tosolving asocialproblem-3 youngpeople a group to develop abusinessplanto solvea socialproblem-Successful start-ups playthe role asmentorsto guide eachgroup ofyoungpeople21PitchingdaySocialentrepreneursform a jury-Each group presentstheirbusinessplan and receivesquestions fromajury-3 groupsof youngpeople win thepitch andmoveto the6-month pre-incubation trainingB. 60 h Pre-incumbents consultationsEach plan wasavailedinseedmoneyto start theirbusiness to solvea socialproblem. Mentorship advice andsupportwere also offered by theFrench-based organization and theNGO.

Source: Tam, Asamoah and Chan (2021) set as a preliminary stage before incumbents’ start, resp. it is a pre-incubation stage.

According to Osawa and Miyazaki (2006) at the commercialization stage the entrepreneurial company is vulnerable because it loss increased and business success is looking too far away, so called “valley of Death” (Figure 1).

Hansen et al. (2022) set that many results from industry-academia research and innovations end up at the Valley of Death. They found that implementation of the agile principles could be a supporting tool that bridges out the Valley of Death in academic entrepreneurial projects.

Tam, Asamoah and Chan (2021) analyzed results from blended entrepreneurial training on the pre-incubation stage for social entrepreneurship development and they set a number of topics (four in 21 sessions) for bridging the valley of death on the pre-incubation stage (Table 2).

In summary, mainly the early-stage entrepreneurs could not survive, as they have not possessed the “right” entrepreneurial competencies. Passing by the entrepreneurial “valley of death” is a team work and group training in the preincubation stage is the possible decision of the “death problem”. The question is: Could the common (academic) entrepreneurial training be used at the preincubation stage?

3. Methodology for finding an early stage academic entrepreneurs

Understanding the role of the universities for developing (academic) entrepreneurs is based on the debate: Could be entrepreneurs trained? And, there are two mainstreams of understanding entrepreneurs (Adcroft, Willis and Dhaliwal 2004):

– The entrepreneurs could be trained via post-graduate / under-graduate training.

– The entrepreneurs could not be manufactured, just recognized.

Despite the debate, entrepreneurial recognition could be done better at the time of training them as the process of finding young people that intend to be entrepreneurs never have been so hard. As the tradition of the training of entrepreneurship in USA is appoint backward to the 1930s in Harvard Business School, entrepreneurial education in the (German speaking) European universities become important at the mid-1990s (Franke and Leuthje 2004) and in Bulgarian Universities as well – in the mid-1990s (Yordanov 2019).

So, there is a long academic tradition to research the entrepreneurial intention of students. As it is not simplifying the process of identification of entrepreneurial students’ intention with the research of their future behavior (resp. Do you think about starting and entrepreneurial business 4 years’ prior to your graduation?), the entrepreneurial intention could be found in a bundle of internal factors (e.g., Bygrave 1989; Moore 1986).

As the personality and behavioral studies explained recently, there are some personal factors that inspire entrepreneurs as well as some behavioral attitudes forcing the entrepreneurial start. Basically, all of them describe the main characteristics of entrepreneurship: risk taking need; locus of control; need of others achieving and others. The main question is: do they could be developed by training and education? The simple answer is: YES, and there are some studies analyzing the role of the Entrepreneurial training and the intention for entrepreneurship (Clark, Davis and Harnish 1984; Brown 1990; Gorman, Hanlon and King 1997; Vesper and McMullan 1997; Franke and Lutje 2004 and others).

Sousa (2018) based on previous research defines the “entrepreneurial leadership” as constructing a set of trained entrepreneurial skills that focused on innovations and value creation. Nieuwenhuizen and Groenewald (2008) and Nieuwenhuizen and Schachtebeck (2021) found that essential entrepreneurial skills are seldom addressed in entrepreneurial training. Accordingly, they analyzed individual entrepreneurial skills (self-concept, creativity and innovation, risk orientation, good human relations, and perseverance, and positive attitude) and entrepreneurial education that are more noticeable by students (innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk-taking).

Additionally, Coony (2012) and Moran and Cooney (2004) found that it is difficult to get the level of entrepreneurial content right for everyone in the group during the entrepreneurial training. And, it is needed an individual approach to any academic entrepreneur. Thus, following Kutzhanova et al (2009) there is a need for individual entrepreneurial skill measurement for

Table 3. EntreComp conceptual model

AreasCompetencesHints1. Ideas andopportunities1.1 Spotting opportunitiesUseyourimaginationandabilitiestoidentifyopportunitiesfor creating value1.2 CreativityDevelop creative and purposefulideas1.3. VisionWork towardsyour vision of thefuture1.4 Valuing ideasMake the most of ideas and opportunities1.5Ethical andsustainablethinkingAssesstheconsequencesandimpactofideas,opportunitiesand actions2.Resources2.1 Self-awarenessand self-efficacyBelieve in yourself and keep developing2.2 Motivation and perseveranceStayfocused and don'tgive up2.3 Mobilizing resourcesGather and manage the resources youneed2.4 Financial and economic literacyDevelop financialandeconomicknow how2.5. Mobilizing othersInspire, enthuse and get others onboard3. Into action3.1 Takingthe initiativeGo for it3.2Planning andmanagementPrioritize, organize and follow-up3.3Coping withuncertainty,ambiguityand riskMake decisionsdealing withuncertainty, ambiguityandrisk3.4Working withothersTeam up, collaborate and network3.5. Learningthrough experienceLearnby doing

Source: Bacigalupo M, Kampylis P, Punie Y and Van Den Brande L. EntreComp:

The Entrepreneurship Competence Framework. EUR 27939 EN.

Luxembourg (Luxembourg): Publications Office of the European Union; 2016. JRC101581, https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC101581 better tailoring the entrepreneurial training of students according to their needs as well as continual monitoring of any change in their entrepreneurial skill.

Following the given points, we use EntreComp: The entrepreneurship competence framework, developed to describe entrepreneurship as a lifelong competence and to identify measure results of entrepreneurial learning. The focus is given to the exploration of connection “entrepreneurial training – entrepreneurial value creation” based on universal transversal skills (Table 3).

The next study is based on the EntreСomp methodology and it is done on three steps1:

Round 1. The research is done within an entrepreneurial training group just before the start of the entrepreneurial education. All of the evaluations are based on the personal knowledge and skills and present the personal understanding of the entrepreneurial skills.

As the group is formed with participants within 3 groups: students, teachers/researchers, and entrepreneurs, the Hypothesis 1 is defined: there is a difference between the three groups (resp. between the average values).

Round 2. A blended entrepreneurial training is done according to the personal entrepreneurial intention of the participants. The training is based on discussion and role games that emphasize practical knowledge covering all 15 entrepreneurial skills areas.

Then, the second research is done to find out the difference to the entrepreneurial intention before and after the training. Thus the Hypothesis 2 is defined: there is a difference between entrepreneurial intention before and after the entrepreneurial training (resp. between the average values)

Round 3. Statistical analysis of the results is done in order to divide the entrepreneurial skills that are notable for entrepreneurial training. The main Hypothesis 3 is defined: there are entrepreneurial skills that are more or less noticeable by students than others.

The results could be summarized as follows.

– 30 trainees took part of the (pre-incubation) academic entrepreneurial training;

– the trainees fulfill one and the same questionnaire based on the EntreComp methodology before and after the training;

– the trainees cover 3 academic roles: teachers/professors, students, and researchers;

– the trainees cover 3 business roles: failed entrepreneurs, active entrepreneurs and “future” entrepreneurs.

The main demographic characteristics are given on Table 4.

Table 4. Characteristics of training group

1. Gender2.Age3.Academic role4. Business role5. Intention to startbusiness

The figures show that there is equity of gender and age inside the group as half of the group are “man” and other half – “Woman” as well as half of the group are young under 35 years old and other are matured – over 35 years old.

According to their academic roles: 37% are students, 23 % are business mentors/teachers, and 40% – professors / researchers. According to the business experience: 57% have no business experience, 20% - have previous experience in business and 23% – manage business at the time of training.

The intention for starting business shows: 27% expect to start business within next 4 years.

According the Round 1 research we built the entrepreneurial profile by the 15th entrepreneurial skills (Figure 2)

According to the figures (Figure 1) we could found 3 groups of entrepreneurial skills:

– Important skills:

– Creativity; visions; motivation; and taking the initiative.

– Average important skills:

– Self-awareness; planning and management; coping with risk; working with others; and learning by doing.

Figure 2. Entrepreneurial skills before training

– Unimportant skills:

– Sustainable thinking; valuable ideas; mobilizing others; mobilizing resources; financial literacy; mobilizing others; and spotting opportunities.

We found the next difference between the 3 groups (Figure 3):

Figure 3. Entrepreneurial skills between groups before training

According to Figure 3, the students are skeptical about their entrepreneurial skills as the professors are optimistic. Nevertheless, students are best in spotting opportunities as the professors are best in motivation, self-awareness and taking the initiative and business mentors: in creativity, vision and mobilizing others. The figures show that there is a significant difference in entrepreneurial skills before training between the three groups. So we CONFIRM Hypothesis 1.

We found differences between the entrepreneurial skills as results of training (Figure 4.)

4,704,905,105,305,505,705,90CreativityVisioValuinSelf-aMotivatizing othersveainty,with othersthrough experienceWorkingLearningCopingwith uncertambiguity and riskPlanning and managementTaking theinitiatinaveragebefore trainingafter trainingg ideasEthical and sustainable thinkingwareness and self-efficacyFinancial and economic literacyMobilion and perseveranceMobilizing resourcesSpotting opportunitiesFinancial and economic literacyMobilion and perseveranceMobilizing resources

Figure 4. Entrepreneurial skills between groups before and after training

According to Figure 4. we found:

– Increase of skills:

– Creativity, valuable ideas, self-awareness, financial literacy, taking initiative;

– Decrease of skills:

– Coping with risk, working with others and visions.

The figures show that there is a significant difference in entrepreneurial skills before and after training so we CONFIRM Hypothesis 2.

According to the previous results we checked the difference of entrepreneurial competencies before and after training for the 3 groups (Figure 5).

Figure 5. Difference of Entrepreneurial skills between groups after and before training

The figures show that the students have bettering their entrepreneurial skills more than other academic participants in three fields: learning through experience, valuing ideas and motivation as the teachers/professors improve their: creativity, visions, coping with risk and taking the initiatives. So we CONFIRM Hypothesis 3.

In summary, the pre-incubation (academic) entrepreneurial training shows that it changes the “entrepreneurial game” as the trainees are better motivated, more creative and more oriented to taking initiatives. These entrepreneurial skills are positive to reduce the risk of falling down at the entrepreneurial “valley of death” as well as improve the numbers of successful academic entrepreneurial stories.

4. Conclusions: Digital pre-incubation instruments

Accordingly, we agree with the Huffman and Quigley (2002) who found that “the university is important in attracting human capital to the local area and in stimulating entrepreneurial talent in the region”. This is a result of highly concentration of the human capital that leads to straighten the link between universities and regional business.

As the conventional training problem is how to balance between individual mentoring and group support on academic entrepreneurial programmes, the digital development gives us the opportunity to do a tailored training meeting individual needs with combination of group working in entrepreneurial business networks.

The decision of the entrepreneurial training problem is: Digital Academic Entrepreneurial Platform. The platform is the digital place where:

– Academic people: teachers/professors/students/researchers, could test their entrepreneurial competencies and to observe it improvement.

– The entrepreneurial skills will be given at their average sum and the academic people could find the difference of their skills compared the average and average of different groups.

– An entrepreneurial training materials will be available to be read by academic people according to the “missing entrepreneurial skills”.

– An open group discussion will be found by using Social Network Chatrooms.

– A tailor made consultation addressed to some of the specific entrepreneurial issues will be given by live-chat meetings and chat-bots.

In conclusion, digital academic tailored entrepreneurial training is the key for the future success of the Universities to attract young people to become (academic) entrepreneurs. Such training with the participation of academic staff: teachers / professors / researchers, and business mentors gives better motivation and improve the idea generation skills that give better opportunity to trap out the entrepreneurial “valley of death”. And this will give the University of future to ogive additional added value to the Next generations of entrepreneurs.

Acknowledgments

The paper is prepared as a part of the research activities of project: “Survey of the level of entrepreneurial competencies among students in Bulgaria” (NID NI-19/2021) as well as by financial support of the project “EconEd 2030: BG05M2OP001-2.016-0004 “ECONOMIC EDUCATION IN BULGARIA 2030”.

NOTES

1. The pre-incubation entrepreneurial training is done as activity under the project: “ICT in textile and clothing higher education and business” (612248-EPP-1-2019-1-BG-EPPKA2-KA) (Sterev et al. 2021, 2022).

REFERENCES

ADCROFT, A.; WILLIS, R. & DHALIWAL S., 2004. Missing the point? Management education and entrepreneurship. Management Decision, vol. 42, no. 3. pp. 521 – 531. DOI: 10.1108/00251740410518958.

AUTIO, E., LAAMANEN, T., 1995. Measurement and evaluation of technology transfer: review of technology transfer mechanisms and indicators. Int. J. Technology Management, Vol. 10, No. 7/8, pp. 643 – 664.

BEJINARU, R., NEAMŢU, D.M., CONDRATOV, I., STANCIU, P., HAPENCIUC C.V., 2023. Exploring the effectiveness of university agenda for developing students' entrepreneurial behavior. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, vol.36, no. 1, pp. 1317 – 1337. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2022.2086597.

COONEY T.M., 2012. Entrepreneurship Skills for Growth-Orientated Businesses, Report for the Workshop on ‘Skills Development for SMEs and Entrepreneurship’, Copenhagen, 28 November.

FELDMAN, M.; FELLER I.; BERCOVITZ, J. & BURTON, R., 2002. Equity and the Technology Transfer Strategies of American Research Universities. Management Science, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 105 – 121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.105.14276.

FRANKE, N., LUETHJE, C., 2004. Entrepreneurial intentions of business students: A benchmarking study. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, (1/3), pp. 269 – 288. https://doi.org/10.1142/ S0219877004000209.

HANSEN, I.; MORK, O.J.; WELOV, T. & RINGEN, G., 2022. Bridging the ‘Valley of Death’: Can Agile Principles Be Applied in Industry-Academia Research and Innovation Projects. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, vol.13, pp. 3172 – 3194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00846-2.

H‚BERT, R.F., LINK, A.N., 1989. In search of the meaning of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, vol. 1, pp. 39–49. https:// doi.org/10.1007/BF00389915.

HUFFMAN, D., QUIGLEY, J.M., 2002. The role of the university in attracting high tech entrepreneurship: A Silicon Valley tale. Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 403 – 419.

IDRIZ, F. & GESHKOV, M., 2019. Contemporary Challenges to Personnel Development in the Industrial Company. Economic Alternatives Journal, Issue 4, pp. 596 – 606.

NIEUWENHUIZEN, C., 2009. “Entrepreneurial Skills”, Juta and Company Ltd, ISBN: 0702176931, 9780702176937.

O’HARA, B. 2011. Entrepreneurship in Ireland. Gill and MacMillan, Dublin.

OSAWA, Y. & MIYAZAKI, K., 2006. An empirical analysis of the valley of death: Large‐scale R&D pro-ject performance in a Japanese diversified company. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, vol.14, no. 2, pp. 93 – 116. DOI: 10.1080/19761597.2006.9668620.

OVCHARUK, O., 2017, Integration of entrepreneurship key competence into education curricula in Ukraine: the way toward democratic school, Bulletin of KrNU, issue 2 (103), http://visnikkrnu.kdu.edu.ua/ statti/2017_2_82-88_2-17-2.pdf.

ROMANOWSKI, R. (Ed.) 2019: Managing Economic Innovations – Ideas and Institutions. Bogucki Wyd. Nauk., Poznań 2019. ISBN 978-837986-276-4 DOI: 10.12657/9788379862764-1, http://bogucki.home.pl/ repozytorium/9788379862764.pdf.

SOUSA, M.J., 2014. “Entrepreneurial Skills Development” Conference Paper (PDF Available) October 2014 with 46,537 Reads Conference: AEBD 14, At Lisbon, pp. 135 – 138. ISBN: 978-960-474-394-0.

STEREV, N., MILUSHEVA, P., HERTLEER, C., SAEED, H. GUAGLIUMI, V., 2021, Entrepreneurial process in Textile and clothing industry: Technical Report, PH-TU Sofia, r4_Entrepreneurial_Process_TCI.pdf (ict-tex.eu).

STEREV, N., MILUSHEVA, P., YORDANOV, D., 2022, Entrepreneurial Process in Textile and Clothing Industry: an overview of European practices, AUTEX 2022 – 21th WORLD TEXTILE CONFERENCE Proceeding, pp. 368 – 372, DOI: 10.34658/9788366741751.76.

STEREV, N., PENCHEV, P., 2023, Historical Development of Business Economics: Bulgarian Case, in alıyurt K.T. (ed.), History of Accounting, Management, Business & Economics, Volume I, Elsevier.

TAM, H.L., ASAMOAH, E., CHAN, A.Y., 2021. Developing Social Entrepreneurship as an Intervention to Enhance Disadvantaged Young People’s Sense of Self-Worth and Career Competence in Hong Kong, Applied Research in Quality of Life, vol. 16, pp. 2497 – 2526. DOI: 10.1007/s11482-021-09917-7.

TOOLE, A.A. & CZARNITZKI, D. 2007. Biomedical academic entrepreneurship through the SBIR program. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization Vol. 63, pp. 716 – 738.

VEDOVELLO, C., GODINHO, M., 2003. Business incubators as a technological infrastructure for supporting small innovative firms' activities. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, vol. 3, no.1/2. DOI: 10.1504/IJEIM.2003.002215.

VUTSOVA, A. & YALAMOV, T., 2023. Institutionalized Academic Entrepreneurship And Academic Spin-Offs. Strategii na obrazovatelnata i nauchnata politika – Strategies for Policy in Science and Education, vol. 31, no. 1., pp.35-60 [In Bulgarian]. DOI: 10.53656/str2023-1-2-ins.

YDRIZ, F., 2011. Person shall cease to have problems with own motivation when he had to inspire other. Science & Technologies Journal, Vol. I, No. 7, Available at: http://www.sustz.com/journal/VolumeI/Number7/ Papers/FahriYdriz.pdf.

YORDANOV, D., 2019. Main characteristics of the modern entrepreneur. Entrepreneurship, Vol. VІI, Iss. 1, pp. 7 – 15.

YORDANOV, D., 2017, Business assessment of entrepreneurs’ activity by the modification of Forbes methodology. Infrastructure and communications in the 21st century Journal, iss. 7 (11 – 12), pp. 248 – 252.

2025 година
Книжка 4
ТРАНСФОРМАЦИИ НА ПАЗАРА НА ТРУДА И НУЖДАТА ОТ ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИ РЕФОРМИ

Ваня Иванова, Андрей Василев, Калоян Ганев, Ралица Симеонова-Ганева

Книжка 3
FORMING ENTREPRENEURIAL CULTURE THROUGH EDUCATION

Prof. Dr. Milena Filipova, Adriana Atanasova, PhD student

Книжка 2s
THE STATE OF INCLUSION IN ADAPTED BASKETBALL

Dr. Stefka Djobova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Ivelina Kirilova, Assist. Prof.

THE IMPACT OF AGE ON ADULT’S PARTICIPATION IN PHYSICAL ACTIVITIES DURING LEISURE TIME

Dr. Despina Sivevska, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Biljana Popeska, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 2
MODEL OF PROFESSIONALLY DIRECTED TRAINING OF FUTURE ENGINEER-TEACHERS

Prof. Ivan Beloev, Dr. Valentina Vasileva, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Іnna Savytska, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Oksana Bulgakova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lesia Zbaravska, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Olha Chaikovska, Assoc. Prof.

QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN BULGARIA: COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY TRAINING

Prof. Rositsa Doneva, Dr. Silvia Gaftandzhieva, Assoc. Prof.

ВЛИЯНИЕ НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО И ЧОВЕШКИЯ КАПИТАЛ ВЪРХУ ФОРМАЛНАТА И НЕФОРМАЛНАТА ИКОНОМИКА

Проф. д-р Стефан Петранов, доц. д-р Стела Ралева, доц. д-р Димитър Златинов

DETERMINANTS AFFECTING ACADEMIC STAFF SATISFACTION WITH ONLINE LEARNING IN HIGHER MEDICAL EDUCATION

Dr. Miglena Tarnovska, Assoc.Prof.; Dr. Rumyana Stoyanova, Assoc.Prof.; Dr. Angelina Kirkova-Bogdanova; Prof. Rositsa Dimova

Книжка 1s
CHALLENGES FACED BY THE BULGARIAN UNIVERSITIES IN THE CONTEXT OF SCIENCE – INDUSTRY RELATIONS

Dr. Svetla Boneva, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Nikolay Krushkov, Assoc. Prof.

INVENTING THE FUTURE: CAN BULGARIAN UNIVERSITIES FULFILL THEIR MISSION AS CATALYSTS FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH AND SUSTAINABILITY?

Dr. Ralitsa Zayakova-Krushkova, Assist. Prof., Dr. Alexander Mitov, Assoc. Prof.

AN INNOVATIVE MODEL FOR DEVELOPING DIGITAL COMPETENCES OF SOCIAL WORKERS

Prof Dr. Lyudmila Vekova, Dr. Tanya Vazova, Chief Assist. Prof., Dr. Penyo Georgiev, Chief Assist. Prof., Dr. Ekaterina Uzhikanova-Kovacheva

BUSINESS ASPECTS OF ACADEMIC PUBLISHING

Dr. Polina Stoyanova, Chief Assist. Prof.

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF MUSIC STREAMING

Dr. Dimiter Gantchev, Assist. Prof.

FILM INCENTIVE SCHEME IN THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA

Dr. Ivan Nachev, Assist. Prof.

PATENT PROTECTION OF DIGITAL TWINS

Dr. Vladislava Pаcheva, Chief Assist. Prof.

Книжка 1

МНОГОСТРАНЕН ПОДХОД ЗА ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ РАВНИЩЕТО НА ДИГИТАЛИЗАЦИЯ В ПОДГОТОВКАТА НА БЪДЕЩИ УЧИТЕЛИ

Доц. д-р Бистра Мизова, проф. д-р Румяна Пейчева-Форсайт Проф. д-р Харви Мелър

2024 година
Книжка 6s
DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES RISK MANAGEMENT

Dr. Miglena Molhova-Vladova, Dr. Ivaylo B. Ivanov

THE DUAL IMPACT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: CATALYST FOR INNOVATION OR THREAT TO STABILITY

Prof. Diana Antonova, Dr. Silvia Beloeva, Assist. Prof., Ana Todorova, PhD student

MARKETING IN TOURISM: PRACTICAL EVIDENCES

Dr. Fahri Idriz, Assoc. Prof.

DEVELOPMENT OF THE INFORMATION ECONOMY CONCEPT AND THE TRANSITION TO INDUSTRY 5.0

Dr. Dora Doncheva, Assist. Prof., Dr. Dimitrina Stoyancheva, Assoc. Prof.

THE GLOBAL MARKET AS A PROJECTION OF THE INFORMATION ECONOMY

Dr. Vanya Hadzhieva, Assist. Prof. Dr. Dora Doncheva, Assist. Prof.

ACADEMIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP: PRACTICAL RESULTS AND TRAINING

Prof. Nikolay Sterev, DSc., Dr. Daniel Yordanov, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 6
AN INTEGRATIVE APPROACH TO ORGANIZING THE FORMATION OF STUDENTS’ COGNITIVE INDEPENDENCE IN CONDITIONS OF INTENSIFICATION OF LEARNING ACTIVITIES

Dr. Albina Volkotrubova, Assoc. Prof. Aidai Kasymova Prof. Zoriana Hbur, DSc. Assoc. Prof. Antonina Kichuk, DSc. Dr. Svitlana Koshova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Svitlana Khodakivska, Assoc. Prof.

ИНОВАТИВЕН МОДЕЛ НА ПРОЕКТНО БАЗИРАНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ НА ГИМНАЗИАЛНИ УЧИТЕЛИ: ДОБРА ПРАКТИКА ОТ УниБИТ

Проф. д-р Жоржета Назърска, доц. д-р Александър Каракачанов, проф. д-р Магдалена Гарванова, доц. д-р Нина Дебрюне

Книжка 5s
КОНЦЕПТУАЛНА РАМКА ЗА ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА ИЗКУСТВЕНИЯ ИНТЕЛЕКТ ВЪВ ВИСШЕТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Акад. д.н. Христо Белоев, проф. д.н. Валентина Войноховска, проф. д-р Ангел Смрикаров

ИЗКУСТВЕНИЯТ ИНТЕЛЕКТ В БИЗНЕСА – ФИНАНСОВИ, ИКОНОМИЧЕСКИ И МАРКЕТИНГОВИ АСПЕКТИ

Проф. д-р Андрей Захариев, доц. д-р Драгомир Илиев Гл. ас. д-р Даниела Илиева

RECENT TRENDS AND APPLICATIONS OF THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE EDUCATION

Prof. Dr. Plamen Zahariev, Prof. Dr. Georgi Hristov, Prof. Dr. Ivan Beloev

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF UTILIZING POPULAR INTELLIGENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS IN EDUCATION

Dr. Galina Ivanova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Aleksandar Ivanov, Assoc. Prof.

CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF TRAINING IN REMOTE VIRTUAL SUPERVISION IN SOCIAL WORK

Dr. Silviya Beloeva, Assist. Prof. Dr. Nataliya Venelinova, Assist. Prof.

ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ ПРИЛОЖИМОСТТА НА БЛОКОВИ ВЕРИГИ ОТ ПЪРВО НИВО (L1) В СИСТЕМА ЗА ЕЛЕКТРОННО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Андриан Минчев, проф. Ваня Стойкова, гл. ас. д-р Галя Шивачева Доц д-р Анелия Иванова

DIGITAL DISCRIMINATION RISKS IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION

Dr. Silviya Beloeva, Assist. Prof. Dr. Nataliya Venelinova, Assist. Prof.

OPPORTUNITIES, CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS FOR DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESSES THROUGH 3D TECHNOLOGIES

Prof. Georgi Hristov, Prof. Plamen Zahariev, Dr. Diyana Kinaneva, Assist. Prof., Georgi Georgiev, Assist. Prof.

ДИГИТАЛНОТО ПОКОЛЕНИЕ VS. СЛЯТОТО, ПОЛУСЛЯТОТО И РАЗДЕЛНОТО ПИСАНЕ

Доц. д-р Владислав Маринов, ас. Анита Тодоранова

OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES FOR THE EDUCATION OF STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS IN THE DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT: THE NEW NORMAL

Prof. Julia Doncheva, DSc., Dr. Galina Ivanova, Assoc. Prof. Dilshod Tojievich Oblokulov

ИЗГРАЖДАНЕ НА КОМПЕТЕНЦИИ ЗА РАЗРАБОТВАНЕ НА STEM ОБУЧИТЕЛНИ РЕСУРСИ У БЪДЕЩИ УЧИТЕЛИ ПО ПРИРОДНИ НАУКИ

Доц. д-р Евгения Горанова, проф. д.н. Валентина Войноховска, проф. д-р Ангел Смрикаров

APPLICATION OF ZSPACE TECHNOLOGY IN THE DISCIPLINES OF THE STEM CYCLE

Boyana Ivanova, Assist. Prof. Dr. Kamelia Shoilekova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Desislava Atanasova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Rumen Rusev, Assoc. Prof.

TEACHERS' ADAPTATION TO CHANGES IN AN INCREASINGLY COMPLEX WORLD THROUGH THE USE OF AI

Prof. Zhanat Nurbekova, Kanagat Baigusheva, Kalima Tuenbaeva, Bakyt Nurbekov Prof. Tsvetomir Vassilev

АТОСЕКУНДНОТО ОБУЧЕНИЕ – МЕТАФОРА НА ДНЕШНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Проф. д.н. Юлия Дончева, Денис Асенов, проф. д-р Ангел Смрикаров проф. д-р Цветомир Василев

APPLICATION AND ASSESSMENT OF DIGITAL RESOURCES IN THE EDUCATION OF FUTURE PEDAGOGUES

Dr. Galina Ivanova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Milena Velikova, Assist. Prof.

IDENTIFYING PLAYER TYPES IN THE CLASSROOM FOR EFFECTIVE GAMIFICATION

Dr. Desislava Atanasova, Assoc. Prof., Viliana Molnar

DEVELOPMENT AND INTEGRATION OF AUDIO AND VISUAL MICRO-RESOURCES IN THE LEARNING PROCESS THROUGH THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS

Dr. Petya Stefanova, Assist. Prof., Dr. Assist. Elitsa Ibryamova, Assist. Prof., Prof. Angel Smrikarov, Dr. Galina Ivanova, Assoc. Prof.

АНАЛИЗ НА ПРОГРАМНИТЕ МОДЕЛИ ЗА АВТОМАТИЗИРАНЕ НА КОГНИТИВНИ ПРОЦЕСИ

Доц. д-р Валентин Атанасов Доц. д-р Анелия Иванова

Книжка 5
MANAGING A POSITIVE AND LIFE-SKILLS DEVELOPMENT IN THE SCHOOL-BASED CURRICULA: A LITERATURE REVIEW ON THE SUSTAINABLE EDUCATION

Dr. Lindita Durmishi, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Ardian Durmishi Prof. Milena Filipova Dr. Silva Ibrahimi

APPLICATION OF THE COMPETENCY MODEL IN BUSINESS ADMINISTARATION HIGHER EDUCATION IN HORIZON 2030

Prof. Nadya Mironova, Dr. Tatyana Kicheva, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Miglena Angelova, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 4s
THE EDUCATION AND RESEARCH IN THE QUADRUPLE HELIX AND THE REGIONAL INNOVATION PROSPECTS

Prof. Dr. Milen Baltov Dr. Stela Baltova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Vilyana Ruseva, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 4
ATTITUDES OF STUDENTS – FUTURE TEACHERS, FOR THE APPLICATION OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Assoc. Prof. Nikolay Tsankov, DSc. Dr. Ivo Damyanov, Assist. Prof.

EDUCATIONAL NEEDS OF THE JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITALIZATION

Dr. Diana Dimitrova, Dr. Darina Dimitrova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Velina Koleva

MANAGERIAL ASPECTS OF COOPERATION AMONG HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THEIR STAKEHOLDERS

Prof. Olha Prokopenko, DSc. Dr. Svitlana Perova, Assoc. Prof. Prof. Tokhir Rakhimov, DSc.

APPLICATION OF EDUCATIONAL STRATEGIES IN STUDYING THE DYNAMICS OF STATE POWER STRUCTURES: IMPLEMENTATION OF FORMAL AND INFORMAL MECHANISMS OF INFLUENCE

Prof. Stoyan Denchev, DSc. Dr. Miriyana Pavlova, Assist. Prof. Dr. Steliana Yordanova, Assist. Prof.

ДИАГНОСТИКА НА ФОРМИРАНАТА ПРОФЕСИОНАЛНА КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТ НА БЪДЕЩИ ИНЖЕНЕРИ ПО ЕНЕРГЕТИКА

Гл. ас. д-р Надя Илиева Доц. д-р Елена Бояджиева Ивалина Маринова

Книжка 3s
A MODEL FOR CALCULATING THE INDIRECT ADDED VALUE OF AI FOR BUSINESS

Dr. Petya Biolcheva, Assoc. Prof., Prof. Nikolay Sterev, DSc.

AI EFFECTIVENESS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF INVESTMENTS IN HIGH-RISK START-UPS

Sotir Ivanov, PhD Student, Dr. Petya Biolcheva, Assoc. Prof.

COMPETITIVENESS OF TEXTILE PRODUCERS IN DIGITAL BUSINESS ERA

Prof. Nikolay Sterev, DSc., Dr. Vyara Milusheva, Assoc. Prof.

CHALLANGES OF USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MANAGEMENT DECISION MAKING

Dr. Bozhana Stoycheva, Assist. Prof. Dr. Pavel Vitliemov, Assoc. Prof.

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ERASMUS+ MOBILITY IN BUSINESS EDUCATION: AN EXAMINATION OF A SUCCESSFUL BULGARIAN-MEXICAN COLLABORATION

Dr. Lyudmila Mihaylova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Emil Papazov, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Diana E. Woolfolk Ruiz

Книжка 3
ИГРОВИ ПОДХОДИ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО: УНИВЕРСИТЕТСКИ КОНТЕКСТ

Проф. д.н. Цветан Давидков Силвия Тонева, докторант

Книжка 2
FORMATION OF PROFESSIONAL SKILLS OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERS DURING LABORATORY PRACTICE WHEN STUDYING FUNDAMENTAL SCIENCE

Dr. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Oksana Bulgakova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Oksana Zakhutska, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Maria Bondar, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lesia Zbaravska, Assoc. Prof.

ИМИДЖ НА УНИВЕРСИТЕТА

Проф. д.п.н. Галя Христозова

Книжка 1s
COMPETITIVENESS AS A RESULT OF CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION

Dr. Nikolay Krushkov, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ralitza Zayakova-Krushkova

INNOVATION, TECHNICAL PROGRESS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Dr. Aleksandar Aleksandrov, Assist. Prof.

ENHANCING ECONOMIC SECURITY THROUGH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Dr. Dimiter Gantchev, Assist. Prof.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND SECURITY IN THE INTEGRATED CIRCUITS INDUSTRY

Dr. Ivan Nachev, Dr. Yuliana Tomova, Iskren Konstantinov, PhD student, Marina Spasova, student

GREEN TRADEMARKS AND SUSTAINABILITY

Dr. Silviya Todorova, Assist. Prof.

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ITS PROTECTION AS AN INVENTION

Dr. Vladislava Pаcheva, Assist. Prof.

Книжка 1
PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Prof. Dr. Milena Filipova Prof. Dr. Olha Prokopenko Prof. Dr. Igor Matyushenko, Dr. Olena Khanova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Olga Shirobokova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ardian Durmishi

RESEARCH OF USING THE SYSTEM APPROACH TO INCREASE PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE OF STUDENTS IN THE PROCESS OF STUDYING NATURAL SCIENCES

Dr. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Іnna Savytska, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Oksana Bulgakova, Assoc. Prof. Prof. Iryna Yasinetska, Dr. Lesia Zbaravska, Assoc. Prof.

2023 година
Книжка 6s
TRANSFORMING MARITIME EDUCATION FOR A DIGITAL INDUSTRY

Dr. Christiana Atanasova, Assist. Prof.

DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMON INFORMATION SYSTEM TO CREATE A DIGITAL CAREER CENTER TOGETHER WITH PARTNER HIGHER SCHOOLS

Prof. Dr. Yordanka Angelova, Dr. Rossen Radonov, Assoc. Prof. Vasil Kuzmov, Assist. Prof. Stela Zhorzh Derelieva-Konstantinova

DRAFTING A DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION STRATEGY FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT SECTOR – EMPIRICAL STUDY ON UAE

Mounir el Khatib, Shikha al Ali, Ibrahim Alharam, Ali Alhajeri Dr. Gabriela Peneva, Assist. Prof., Prof. Jordanka Angelova, Mahmoud Shanaa

VOYAGE OF LEARNING: CRUISE SHIPS WEATHER ROUTING AND MARITIME EDUCATION

Prof. Svetlana Dimitrakieva, Dr. Dobrin Milev, Assist. Prof., Dr. Christiana Atanasova, Assist. Prof.

RESEARCH ON THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT COMPETENCES OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN PRACTICE

Land. arch. Elena Dragozova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Stanislava Kovacheva, Assoc. Prof.

STUDY OF THE KEY FACTORS INFLUENCING THE EFFECTIVE PLANNING AND UTILIZATION OF PRODUCTION FACILITIES IN THE INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISE

Dr. Tanya Panayotova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Krasimira Dimitrova, Assoc. Prof., Neli Veleva, PhD student

SIMULATOR TRAINING – UNIQUE POWERFUL INSTRUMENT FOR EDUCATING, SKILLS CREATING, MITIGATING SKILLS AND RESILIENCE CREATING

Prof. Dimitar Dimitrakiev, Vencislav Stankov, Assist. Prof., Dr. Christiana Atanasova, Assist. Prof.

СТРУКТУРНИ ПРОМЕНИ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО НА МЕНИДЖЪРИ ЗА ИНДУСТРИЯ 5.0

Доц. д-р Недко Минчев, доц. д-р Венета Христова, гл. ас. д-р Иван Стоянов

RESEARCH OF THE INNOVATION CAPACITY OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS

Dr. Siya Veleva, Assoc. Prof.; Prof. Dr. Eng. Margarita Mondeshka Dr. Anka Tsvetanova, Assoc. Prof.,

Книжка 6
Книжка 5s
ПРЕСЕЧНАТА ТОЧКА НА СПОРТА, СИГУРНОСТТА И КРИПТО ФЕН ТОКЕНИТЕ

Полк. доц. Георги Маринов Доц. Милена Кулева

ВИДОВЕ ТРАВМИ В ПАРАШУТИЗМА И ПРЕВЕНЦИЯТА ИМ

Капитан III ранг Георги Калинов

ОБУЧЕНИЕ В ХОДЕНЕ С ПОМОЩНИ СРЕДСТВА – РИСКОВЕ И СИГУРНОСТ ЗА ПАЦИЕНТА

Атанас Друмев Доц. д-р Данелина Вачева, доц. д-р Искра Петкова

Книжка 5
ПОДХОДИ ЗА ПСИХОСОЦИАЛНА ПОДКРЕПА НА УНИВЕРСИТЕТСКИ ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛИ В УСЛОВИЯ НА КРИЗА

Доц. д.н. Цветелина Търпоманова, доц. д.н. Веселина Славова

Книжка 4s
DETERMINING THE DEGREE OF DIGITALIZATION OF A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION

Acad. DSc. Hristo Beloev, Prof. Dr. Angel Smrikarov, Assoc. Prof. DSc. Valentina Voinohovska, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Galina Ivanova

A STUDY ON THE POSSIBILITIES TO INTEGRATE THE MODERN 3D TECHNOLOGIES IN THE SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

Prof. Dr. Georgi Hristov, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Plamen Zahariev, Assist. Prof. Dr. Diyana Kinaneva, Assist. Prof. Georgi Georgiev

THE ROLE OF THE UNIVERSITIES AS ACCELERATORS FOR THE INTEGRATION OF THE STEM LEARNING METHODS IN THE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS

Prof. Dr. Georgi Hristov, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Plamen Zahariev, Assist. Prof. Georgi Georgiev

ОТ STEM КЪМ BEST: ДВА СТАНДАРТА, ЕДНА ЦЕЛ

Проф. д-р Андрей Захариев, проф. д-р Стефан Симеонов, гл. ас. д-р Таня Тодорова

ВЪЗМОЖНОСТИ ЗА ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА БЛОКЧЕЙН ТЕХНОЛОГИЯТА В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Докторант Андриан Минчев, доц. д-р Ваня Стойкова

ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВА НА ДИГИТАЛНАТА ТРАНСФОРМАЦИЯ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО – СРАВНИТЕЛЕН АНАЛИЗ НА СТУДЕНТСКОТО МНЕНИЕ

Гл. ас. д-р Мирослава Бонева, доц. д-р Антон Недялков, проф. д.н. Милена Кирова

CHALLENGES, REQUIREMENTS, OPPORTUNITIES AND SOLUTIONS FOR THE DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE TRANSPORT EDUCATION

Prof. Dr. Georgi Hristov, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Plamen Zahariev

Книжка 4
EFFECT OF RESILIENCE ON BURNOUT IN ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

Dr. Radina Stoyanova, Prof. Sonya Karabeliova, Petya Pandurova, Dr. Nadezhda Zheckova Dr. Kaloyan Mitev

STATE AND PROSPECTS OF DEVELOPMENT OF ACADEMIC MOBILITY IN THE SYSTEM OF TRAINING A SPECIAL EDUCATION SPECIALIST

Dr. Tetiana Dokuchyna, Assoc. Prof., Prof. Dr. Svitlana Myronova, Dr. Tetiana Franchuk, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 3s
STRATEGIES AND POLICIES TO SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT OF AI TECHNOLOGIES IN EUROPE

Assoc. Prof. Miglena Molhova, Assoc. Prof. Petya Biolcheva

BULGARIA'S TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH THE PRISM OF HIGHER EDUCATION POLICIES

Assoc. Prof. Ivaylo B. Ivanov, Assoc. Prof. Miglena Molhova

INTELLIGENT ANIMAL HUSBANDRY: FARMER ATTITUDES AND A ROADMAP FOR IMPLEMENTATION

Prof. Dr. Dimitrios Petropoulos, Koutroubis Fotios Assoc. Prof. Petya Biolcheva Evgeni Valchev

EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES IN TOURISM THROUGH MOTIVATION

Assoc. Prof. Fahri Idriz Assoc. Prof. Marin Geshkov

Книжка 3
САМООЦЕНКА НА ОБЩООБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИТЕ И РЕСУРСНИТЕ УЧИТЕЛИ ЗА РАБОТА В ПАРАДИГМАТА НА ПРИОБЩАВАЩОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Проф. д.н. Милен Замфиров, проф. Емилия Евгениева, проф. Маргарита Бакрачева

STUDY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE USE OF COMMUNICATIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS OF ENGINEERS TRAINING

Assoc. Prof. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof. Valentina Vasileva Assoc. Prof. Sergii Bilan, Assoc. Prof. Maria Bondar, Assoc. Prof. Oksana Bulgakova, Assoc. Prof. Lyubov Shymko

SAFETY THROUGH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE MARITIME INDUSTRY

Assoc. Prof. Petya Biolcheva Evgeni Valchev, PhD student

Книжка 2
РАЗПОЛОЖЕНИЕ НА ВИСШИТЕ УЧИЛИЩА В БЪЛГАРИЯ В КОНТЕКСТА НА ФОРМИРАНЕ НА ПАЗАРА НА ТРУДА

Гл. ас. д-р Цветелина Берберова-Вълчева, доц. д-р Камен Петров, доц. д-р Николай Цонков

CHARACTERISTICS AND COMPONENTS OF THE CYBER HYGIENE AS A SUBCLASS OF CYBER SECURITY IN MILITARY ENVIRONMENT AND EDUCATIONAL ISSUES

Prof. Boyan Mednikarov, DSc. Prof. Yuliyan Tsonev Dr. Borislav Nikolov, Prof. Andon Lazarov, DSc.

Книжка 1
MODERNIZATION OF THE CONTENT OF THE LECTURE COURSE IN PHYSICS FOR TRAINING FUTURE AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERS

Dr. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Valentina Vasileva, Assoc. Prof. Prof. Vasyl Shynkaruk, DSc., Assoc. Prof. Oksana Bulgakova, Assoc. Prof. Maria Bondar Assoc. Prof. Lesia Zbaravska, Assoc. Prof. Sergii Slobodian

THE NEW PANDEMIC NORMAL THROUGH THE EYES OF BULGARIAN STUDENTS

Prof. Vyara Stoilova, Assoc. Prof. Todorka Kineva

2022 година
Книжка 6
ORGANIZATION OF AN INCLUSIVE EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT FOR THE STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS

Prof. Halyna Bilavych Prof. Nataliia Bakhmat Prof. Tetyana Pantiuk, Prof. Mykola Pantiuk Prof. Borys Savchuk

ДИГИТАЛИЗАЦИЯ НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО В БЪЛГАРИЯ: СЪСТОЯНИЕ И ОБЩИ ТЕНДЕНЦИИ

Д-р Теодора Върбанова, проф. д-р Албена Вуцова, доц. д-р Николай Нетов

СКРИНИНГ НА ЗРЕНИЕТО – ПРОФИЛАКТИКА И ЕЛЕМЕНТ ОТ ПРАКТИКАТА НА СТУДЕНТИ И ОБУЧЕНИЕТО НА УЧЕНИЦИ

Руска Драганова-Христова, д-р Славена Стойкова, доц. д-р Снежана Йорданова

Книжка 5
ПРАВОТО НА ИЗБОР В ЖИВОТА НА ДЕЦАТА В РЕПУБЛИКА БЪЛГАРИЯ

Проф. д.п.н. Сийка Чавдарова-Костова, гл. ас. д-р Даниела Рачева, ас. Екатерина Томова, доц. д-р Росица Симеонова

SUSTAINABLE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH COACHING: BENEFITS FOR TEACHERS AND LEARNERS

Assoc. Prof. Irina Ivanova, Assoc. Prof. Penka Kozhuharova, Prof. Rumyana Todorova

SELF-ASSESSMENT – A COMPONENT OF THE COMPETENCE-BASED TRAINING IN THE PROFESSION “APPLIED PROGRAMMER”

Assoc. Prof. Ivaylo Staribratov, Muharem Mollov, Rosen Valchev Petar Petrov

Книжка 4
BENCHMARKING FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SPEED AND POWER CHARACTERISTICS

Assist. Prof. Dr. Darinka Ignatova Assoc. Prof. Dr. Alexander Iliev

DIAGNOSIS AS A TOOL FOR MONITORING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ADDICTION PREVENTION IN ADOLESCENTS

Prof. O.A. Selivanova Assoc. Prof. N.V. Bystrova, Assoc. Prof. I.I. Derecha, Assoc. Prof. T.S. Mamontova, Assoc. Prof. O.V. Panfilova

Книжка 3
ПУБЛИЧНОТО РАЗБИРАНЕ НА НАУКАТА В МРЕЖОВИЯ СВЯТ

Д-р Светломир Здравков, д-р Мартин Й. Иванов, д-р Петя Климентова

ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ ЗА УСТОЙЧИВО РАЗВИТИЕ – ПРАКТИКО-ПРИЛОЖНИ АСПЕКТИ

Гл. ас. д-р Златка Ваклева Проф. д-р Тоня Георгиева

Книжка 2
PREPARATION OF PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS FOR COMMUNICATIVE AND RHETORICAL ACTIVITY IN SCHOOL IN THE CONTEXT OF THEIR PRACTICAL TRAINING

Prof. Halyna Bilavych Prof. Nataliia Bakhmat Prof. Tetyana Pantyuk, Prof. Mykola Pantyuk Prof. Borys Savchuk

ПРОЛЕТНА КОНФЕРЕНЦИЯ НА СЪЮЗА НА МАТЕМАТИЦИТЕ В БЪЛГАРИЯ

(Трявна, 5 – 9 април 2022) Гл. ас. д-р Албена Симова

Книжка 1
ДИГИТАЛНАТА ИНТЕРАКЦИЯ ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛ – СТУДЕНТ В ОНЛАЙН ОБУЧЕНИЕТО В МЕДИЦИНСКИТЕ УНИВЕРСИТЕТИ

Д-р Миглена Търновска, д-р Румяна Стоянова Доц. Боряна Парашкевова, проф. Юлияна Маринова

2021 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ЕДНА РЕКАПИТУЛАЦИЯ НА ИЗСЛЕДВАНИЯ ВЪРХУ ИНТЕРКУЛТУРНИТЕ ОТНОШЕНИЯ. КАКВО СЛЕДВА ОТ ТОВА ЗА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО?

Давидков, Ц., 2019. Изследвания върху културите. Културни ориентири на управлението. София: СУ „Св. Климент Охридски“, ISBN 978-954-9399-52-3 Проф. Пламен Макариев

Книжка 4s
RECOGNITION OF FAKE NEWS IN SPORTS

Colonel Assoc. Prof. Petko Dimov

SIGNAL FOR HELP

Ina Vladova, Milena Kuleva

Книжка 4
PREMISES FOR A MULTICULTURAL APPROACH TO EDUCATION

Dr. Anzhelina Koriakina, Assoc. Prof., Prof. Lyudmila Amanbaeva, DSc.

ПОЗИТИВНА ПСИХОЛОГИЯ: ПРОБЛЕМНИ ОБЛАСТИ И ФОРМИРАНЕ НА ЛИЧНОСТТА

Доц. д-р Стоил Мавродиев, Любомира Димитрова

КНИГА ЗА ИСТОРИЯТА НА БЪЛГАРСКОТО ВИСШЕ ИНЖЕНЕРНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Сгурев, В., Гергов, С., Иванов, Г., 2019. Положителните науки с приложение към индустрията. История на висшето техническо образование в България. София: Изд. на БАН „Проф. Марин Дринов“, Изд. „Захарий Стоянов“. ISBN 978-619-245-004-5, ISBN 978-954-09-1387-2.

Книжка 3
ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND INTERDISCIPLINARY EDUCATION – SEMIOTIC ASPECTS

Prof. Dr. Christo Kaftandjiev Dr. Diana Kotova

THE PRACTICAL IMPORTANCE OF ACCOUNTING EDUCATION FOR FUTURE MANAGERS

Nataliia Radionova, DSc. Dr. Radostina Stoyanova, Assist. Prof.

ЗА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНАТА ИНТЕГРАЦИЯ И ЗАЛОЗИТЕ НА НАСТОЯЩЕТО

Нунев, Й., 2020. Мониторинг на процесите на приобщаване и образователна интеграция и модели за десегрегация на ромското образование. Пловдив: Астарта, ISBN 978-954-350-283-7

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
METHODOLOGY OF SAFETY AND QUALITY OF LIFE ON THE BASIS OF NOOSPHERIC EDUCATION SYSTEM FORMATION

Nataliia Bakhmat Nataliia Ridei, Nataliia Tytova, Vladyslava Liubarets, Oksana Katsero

ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ В УСТОЙЧИВО РАЗВИТИЕ И ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЕ „ДЕТЕ – СРЕДА“

Стоянова, М. (2020). Образование в устойчиво развитие и взаимодействие „дете – среда“ София: Авангард принт. ISBN 978-954-337-408-3

2020 година
Книжка 6
HIGHER EDUCATION AS A PUBLIC GOOD

Yulia Nedelcheva, Miroslav Nedelchev

Книжка 5
НАСЪРЧАВАНЕ НА СЪТРУДНИЧЕСТВОТО МЕЖДУ ВИСШИТЕ УЧИЛИЩА И БИЗНЕСА

Добринка Стоянова, Блага Маджурова, Гергана Димитрова, Стефан Райчев

Книжка 4
THE STRATEGY OF HUMAN RIGHTS STUDY IN EDUCATION

Anush Balian Nataliya Seysebayeva Natalia Efremova Liliia Danylchenko

Книжка 3
ПОМОЩНИ СРЕДСТВА И ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ПРИОБЩАВАЩОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Янкова, Ж. (2020). Помощни средства и технологии за деца и ученици със специални образователни потребности в приобщаващото образование.

Книжка 2
МИГРАЦИЯ И МИГРАЦИОННИ ПРОЦЕСИ

Веселина Р. Иванова

SOCIAL STATUS OF DISABLED PEOPLE IN RUSSIA

Elena G. Pankova, Tatiana V. Soloveva, Dinara A. Bistyaykina, Olga M. Lizina

Книжка 1
ETHNIC UPBRINGING AS A PART OF THE ETHNIC CULTURE

Sholpankulova Gulnar Kenesbekovna

ЗА СВЕТЛИНАТА, КОЯТО ИЗЛЪЧВА… В ПАМЕТ НА ПРОФ. Д.П.Н. АСЕМГУЛ МАЛДАЖАНОВА

Нашата редколегия загуби един все- отдаен и неповторим колега и приятел – проф. д.п.н. Асемгул Малдажанова. Пе- дагог по призвание и филолог по мисия! Отиде си от нас нашият приятел, коле- га и член на редколегията на списанието – професор д.п.н. Асемгул Малдажанова – първи заместник-ректор на Евразийския

2019 година
Книжка 6
EMOTIONAL COMPETENCE OF THE SOCIAL TEACHER

Kadisha K. Shalgynbayeva Ulbosin Zh.Tuyakova

Книжка 5
„ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИ КИНОХОРИЗОНТИ“ В ПОЛЕТО НА МЕДИА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

(2018). Образователни кинохоризонти. Международен сборник с научни публи- кации по проект „Естетически и образователни проекции на кинодидактиката“. Бургас: Проф. д-р Асен Златаров. Съставител: Маргарита Терзиева. ISBN 978-954-471-496-3

Книжка 4
ВИСШЕТО МОРСКО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ В КОНКУРЕНТНА СРЕДА

Бакалов, Я. (2019). Висше морско образование. Лидиране в конкурентна среда. Варна: Стено. ISBN 978-619-241-029-2

Книжка 3
УЧИЛИЩЕТО НА БЪДЕЩЕТО

Наталия Витанова

Книжка 2
КНИГА ЗА УСПЕШНИТЕ НАУЧНИ ПУБЛИКАЦИИ

Кожухаров, А. (2018). Успешните научни публикации. Варна: Тера Балканика. ISBN 978-619-90844-1-0

Книжка 1
POST-GRADUATE QUALIFICATION OF TEACHERS IN INTERCULTURAL EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT

Irina Koleva, Veselin Tepavicharov, Violeta Kotseva, Kremena Yordanova

ДЕЦАТА В КОНСТИТУЦИОННИТЕ НОРМИ НА БЪЛГАРИЯ

Румен Василев, Весела Марева

СЪСТОЯНИЕ НА БЪЛГАРСКОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Анелия Любенова Любомир Любенов

ИНТЕРКУЛТУРНИЯТ ТРЕНИНГ КАТО ЧАСТ ОТ СТРАТЕГИЯТА ЗА ГЛОБАЛИЗАЦИОННА ИНТЕГРАЦИЯ

Хубенова, М. (2018). Значение на междукултурната комуникация за направления: политически науки, право, икономика и бизнес. София: Издателски комплекс УНСС. ISBN 978-619-232-072-0

ЕДИН НОВ УЧЕБНИК

Дончева, Ю. (2018). Теоретични и методически основи на запознаване с околния свят в детската градина. Русе: Лени Ан

2018 година
Книжка 6
СТРАТЕГИИ НА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНАТА И НАУЧНАТА ПОЛИТИКА НАУЧНО СПИСАНИЕ STRATEGIES FOR POLICY IN SCIENCE AND EDUCATION EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL ГОДИНА XXVI / VOLUME 26, 2018 ANNUAL CONTENTS / ГОДИШНО СЪДЪРЖАНИЕ СТРАНИЦИ / PAGES КНИЖКА 1 / NUMBER 1: 1 – 120 КНИЖКА 2 / NUMBER 2: 121 – 224 КНИЖКА 3 / NUMBER 3: 225 – 336 КНИЖКА 4 / NUMBER 4: 337 – 448 КНИЖКА 5 / NUMBER 5: 449 – 560 КНИЖКА 6 / NUMBER 6: 561 – 664

ДИСКУСИОННО / DISCUSSION 211 – 216: Процедурата за назначаване на ръководител на катедра като причина за вло- шаващото се качество на обучението и микроклимата във висшите учи лища у нас [The Procedure for Appointing a Head of Department as a Reason for the Deteriorating Quality of Education and the Microclimate in the Higher School] / Александър Димит- ров / Alexander Dimitrov

Книжка 5
A NEW AWARD FOR PROFESSOR MAIRA KABAKOVA

The staff of the Editorial board of the journal “Strategies for Policy in Science and Education” warmly and sincerely congratulates their Kazakhstan colleague -

ПРОДЪЛЖАВАЩАТА КВАЛИФИКАЦИЯ НА УЧИТЕЛИТЕ – НОРМАТИВЕН И ИЗСЛЕДОВАТЕЛСКИ ОБЗОР

(научно-теоретично обобщение върху проведени обучения на учители)

ЕТНОЦЕНТРИЗМЪТ И ИНЕРЦИИТЕ ОТ МИНАЛОТО – СЕРИОЗНИ ПРОБЛЕМИ В БЪЛГАРСКАТА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА СИСТЕМА

(Eтнопедагогически аспекти на основното и средното образование) Веселин Тепавичаров

Книжка 4
ХРИСТО БОТЕВ И ПОЗНАВАТЕЛНИЯТ КРЪГОЗОР НА СЪВРЕМЕННИТЕ СТУДЕНТИ ЗА ЕВРОПА

Изследователски разказ за един познавателен подвиг и за една познавателна недостатъчност

Книжка 3
BLENDED EDUCATION IN HIGHER SCHOOLS: NEW NETWORKS AND MEDIATORS

Nikolay Tsankov Veska Gyuviyska Milena Levunlieva

ВЗАИМОВРЪЗКАТА МЕЖДУ СПОРТА И ПРАВОТО

Ивайло Прокопов, Елица Стоянова

НАДНАЦИОНАЛНИ И МЕЖДУПРАВИТЕЛСТВЕНИ МЕТОДИ НА ИНТЕГРАЦИЯ В ОБЛАСТТА НА ПРАВОСЪДИЕТО И СИГУРНОСТТА

(Формиране на обща миграционна политика: парадигми и образователни аспекти) Лора Махлелиева-Кларксън

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
ВЪЗПРИЯТИЯ И НАГЛАСИ НА УЧЕНИЦИТЕ ПО ВАЖНИ ОБЩЕСТВЕНИ ВЪПРОСИ

(Данни от Международното изследване на гражданското образование – ICCS 2016)

2017 година
Книжка 6
ЗНАЧИМОСТТА НА УЧЕНЕТО: АНАЛИЗ НА ВРЪЗКИТЕ МЕЖДУ ГЛЕДНИТЕ ТОЧКИ НА УЧЕНИЦИ, РОДИТЕЛИ И УЧИТЕЛИ

Илиана Мирчева, Елена Джамбазова, Снежана Радева, Деян Велковски

ВЪЗПРИЯТИЯ И НАГЛАСИ НА УЧЕНИЦИТЕ ПО ВАЖНИ ОБЩЕСТВЕНИ ВЪПРОСИ

(Данни от Международното изследване на гражданското образование – ICCS 2016)

СТРАТЕГИИ НА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНАТА И НАУЧНАТА ПОЛИТИКА НАУЧНО СПИСАНИЕ STRATEGIES FOR POLICY IN SCIENCE AND EDUCATION EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL ГОДИНА XXV / VOLUME 25, 2017 ANNUAL CONTENTS / ГОДИШНО СЪДЪРЖАНИЕ

СТРАНИЦИ / PAGES КНИЖКА 1 / NUMBER 1: 1 – 112 КНИЖКА 2 / NUMBER 2: 113 – 224 КНИЖКА 3 / NUMBER 3: 225 – 336 КНИЖКА 4 / NUMBER 4: 337 – 448 КНИЖКА 5 / NUMBER 5: 449 – 552 КНИЖКА 6 / NUMBER 6: 553 – 672

Книжка 5
ОРГАНИЗАЦИОННА КУЛТУРА В УЧИЛИЩЕ

Ивайло Старибратов, Лилия Бабакова

Книжка 4
КОУЧИНГ. ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЕН КОУЧИНГ

Наталия Витанова, Нели Митева

Книжка 3
ТЕХНОХУМАНИЗМЪТ И ДЕЙТЪИЗМЪТ – НОВИТЕ РЕЛИГИИ НА БЪДЕЩЕТО

Harari, Y. N. (2016). Homo Deus. A Brief History of Tomorrow. Harvill Secker. ISBN-10: 1910701874

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
РЕФОРМИТЕ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО – ПЕРСПЕКТИВИ И ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВА

Интервю с Габриела Миткова, началник на Регионалното управление на образованието – Силистра

ЕМПАТИЯ И РЕФЛЕКСИЯ

Нели Кънева, Кристиана Булдеева

2016 година
Книжка 6
СТРАТЕГИИ НА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНАТА И НАУЧНАТА ПОЛИТИКА НАУЧНО СПИСАНИЕ STRATEGIES FOR POLICY IN SCIENCE AND EDUCATION EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL ГОДИНА XXIV / VOLUME 24, 2016 ANNUAL CONTENT / ГОДИШНО СЪДЪРЖАНИЕ

СТРАНИЦИ / PAGES КНИЖКА 1 / NUMBER 1: 1 – 120 КНИЖКА 2 / NUMBER 2: 121 – 232 КНИЖКА 3 / NUMBER 3: 233 – 344 КНИЖКА 4 / NUMBER 4: 345 – 456 КНИЖКА 5 / NUMBER 5: 457 – 568 КНИЖКА 6 / NUMBER 6: 569 – 672

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2015 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2014 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
КОХЕРЕНТНОСТ НА ПОЛИТИКИ

Албена Вуцова, Лиляна Павлова

Книжка 4
ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО ПО ПРАВАТА НА ЧОВЕКА ПРЕЗ ПОГЛЕДА НА ДОЦ. ЦЕЦКА КОЛАРОВА

Цецка Коларова. (2013). Образование по правата на човека. София: Авангард Прима. ISBN 978-619-160-234-6

USING THE RESULTS OF A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT

Thomas Kellaghan Vincent Greaney T. Scott Murray Chapter 4 Translating Assessment Findings Into Policy And Action Although the primary purpose of a system of national assessment is to describe students’ learning, its role is not limited to description. To justify the effort and expenditure involved, the information that an assessment provides about the achievements of students, their strengths and weaknesses, and how they are distributed in the population (for example, by gender or location

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF UNIVERSITY FACULTY: А SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS

Gulnar Toltaevna Balakayeva Alken Shugaybekovich Tokmagambetov Sapar Imangalievich Ospanov

ЗА ПО-ХУМАНИСТИЧНА ТРАДИЦИОННО- ИНОВАЦИОННА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНО-ВЪЗПИТАТЕЛНА СТРАТЕГИЯ У НАС

(КОНЦЕПТУАЛНА РАЗРАБОТКА В ПОМОЩ НА ПОДГОТОВКАТА НА НОВ ЗАКОН ЗА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО)

Книжка 1
РЕФЛЕКСИЯТА В ИНТЕГРАТИВНОТО ПОЛЕ НА МЕТОДИКАТА НА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО ПО БИОЛОГИЯ

Иса Хаджиали, Наташа Цанова, Надежда Райчева, Снежана Томова

USING THE RESULTS OF A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT

Thomas Kellaghan Vincent Greaney T. Scott Murray Chapter 1 Factors affecting the use and nonuse of national assessment fi ndings The main objectives of a national assessment, as set out in volume 1 of this series, Assessing National Achievement Levels in Education, are to determine (a) how well students are learning in the education system (with reference to general expectations, aims of the curriculum, and preparation for further learning and for life); (b) whether there is evidence of par

2013 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
Книжка 4
QUESTIONNAIRE DEVELOPMENT

ÎÖÅÍßÂÀÍÅÒÎ

РОССИЙСКАЯ СИСТЕМА ОЦЕНКИ КАЧЕСТВА ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ: ГЛАВНЫЕ УРОКИ

В. Болотов / И. Вальдман / Г. Ковалёва / М. Пинская

Книжка 3
MASS MEDIA CULTURE IN KAZAKHSTAN

Aktolkyn Kulsariyeva Yerkin Massanov Indira Alibayeva

РОССИЙСКАЯ СИСТЕМА ОЦЕНКИ КАЧЕСТВА ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ: ГЛАВНЫЕ УРОКИ

В. Болотов / И. Вальдман / Г. Ковалёва / М. Пинская

Книжка 2
ОЦЕНЯВАНЕ НА ГРАЖДАНСКИТЕ КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТИ НА УЧЕНИЦИТЕ: ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВА И ВЪЗМОЖНОСТИ

Светла Петрова Център за контрол и оценка на качеството на училищното образование

Книжка 1
Уважаеми читатели,

вет, както и от международния борд за предоставените статии и студии, за да могат да бъдат идентифицирани в полето на образованието пред широката аудитория от педа- гогически специалисти във всички степени на образователната ни система. Благодаря за техния всеотдаен и безвъзмезден труд да създават и популяризират мрежа от научни съобщества по профила на списанието и да насърчават научните изследвания. Благодаря на рецензентите от национално представените висши училища, на- учни институции и

METHODS FOR SETTING CUT SCORES IN CRITERION – REFERENCED ACHIEVEMENT TESTS

ÎÖÅÍßÂÀÍÅÒÎ COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE QUALITY OF THE SEPARATE METHODS

ПУБЛИКАЦИИ ПРЕЗ 2012 Г.

СПИСАНИЕ „БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕЗИК И ЛИТЕРАТУРА“

2012 година
Книжка 6
DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE IN KAZAKHSTAN IN THE PERIOD OF INDEPENDENCE

Aigerim Mynbayeva Maira Kabakova Aliya Massalimova

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
СИСТЕМАТА ЗА РАЗВИТИЕ НА АКАДЕМИЧНИЯ СЪСТАВ НА РУСЕНСКИЯ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ „АНГЕЛ КЪНЧЕВ“

Христо Белоев, Ангел Смрикаров, Орлин Петров, Анелия Иванова, Галина Иванова

Книжка 2
ПРОУЧВАНЕ НА РОДИТЕЛСКОТО УЧАСТИЕ В УЧИЛИЩНИЯ ЖИВОТ В БЪЛГАРИЯ

* Този материал е изготвен въз основа на резултатите от изследването „Parental Involvement in Life of School Matters“, проведено в България в рамките на проек- та „Advancing Educational Inclusion and Quality in South East Europe“, изпълняван

ВТОРИ ФОРУМ ЗА СТРАТЕГИИ В НАУКАТА

Тошка Борисова В края на 2011 г. в София се проведе второто издание на Форум за страте- гии в науката. Основната тема бе повишаване на международната видимост и разпознаваемост на българската наука. Форумът се организира от „Elsevier“ – водеща компания за разработване и предоставяне на научни, технически и медицински информационни продукти и услуги , с подкрепата на Министер- ството на образованието, младежта и науката. След успеха на първото издание на Форума за стратегии в науката през

Книжка 1
РЕЙТИНГИ, ИНДЕКСИ, ПАРИ

Боян Захариев