Стратегии на образователната и научната политика

2012/6, стр. 501 - 510

DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE IN KAZAKHSTAN IN THE PERIOD OF INDEPENDENCE

Резюме:

Ключови думи:

Introduction

The modern development of the society is characterized by high dynamics of development of science and innovation. „The competitiveness of the economy“, „transition to an economy based on knowledge“, „innovation economy“ – is the concept of a modern XXI century. Kazakhstan – a new independent state, is actively conducting research. The development of science over 20 years of independence was of a contradictory character. In the fi rst approximation, we can clearly distinguish two time periods: the crisis of science in Kazakhstan and the dynamic transformation, aimed at the industrial-innovative development of an independent state, the formation of a „smart economy“.

If the fi rst time period longer re ect regional trends, the second time period is longer in the logic of world trends of development of an innovative economy. As you know, „knowledge triangle“ – research, education and innovation - defi ned as the main factor of European efforts to meet the Lisbon objectives of the strategy of the European Union to transform the EU economy the most dynamic and most competitive economy in the world. Such an understanding is approximated for the development of Kazakhstan’s XXI century.

Purpose of the article – analysis and periodization of the development of science in Kazakhstan and to identify features of the scientific policy of Kazakhstan, development of new directions in line with global trends, identify problem areas R & D. Since the authors are members of university research, we will focus on the features of the present stage of development of university science.

The expansion of the functional field of science in modern society

In the XX century science becomes a powerful social institution. The importance of science in public policy in the countries of the world’s leading high. As you know, at the end of the last decade in most developed economies the share of domestic expenditure on research and development amounted to an average share of GDP 3.0% (in Sweden – 3.8%, Finland – 3.5%, Japan – 3 , 04%, Switzerland – 2.73%, USA – 2.84%, Germany – 2.44%, while the state’s share of these costs was on average 25–34%) (National Program for the Development of Science of the RK for 2007–2012 years).

Accordingly, the extended function fi eld of science in modern society. This vision of the projected functions similar to the formation of A.M. Osipov in the sociology of education (Osipov, 2006).

In the economic sphere, science becomes a productive force of society, is attracting significant economic resources for the development of science, and therefore society’s expectations of him are high. In addition, there is an internal reallocation of resources for scientific activities, in particular, for example, between regions, urban and rural areas, etc. As you know, in Kazakhstan the most developed in the scientifi c field is the city of Almaty, Astana, East Kazakhstan region, etc.

In the field of science contributes to culture, on the one hand, the broadcast, professional development and expansion of human cultures through the production of new knowledge and technologies, on the other hand - innovation in the fi eld of culture. Thirdly, scientific activity is the production and reproduction of social intelligence of the country through the reproduction of social technologies of intellectual activity.

In the social functions of science aimed at: a) the reproduction of scientifi c communities, socio-professional groups, and b) science is becoming one of the channels of mass social movements, social mobility, and c) promotes personal self-scientists, and their success in the creative and professional activities. The functions of science in the socio-political sphere, improving the image of the country (Figure 1).

Expanding the functions of science in society are natural, they allow a clear understanding and full consideration to explore productive development of science and society as a whole, will help in building an innovative economy in Kazakhstan.

In the economic sphereScience isproductive force insocietyInvolvement ofthe economic forthe development ofscienceThe internalallocation ofresources for scientific activityIn the field of cultureTranslation,development andexpansion ofprofessional culturesInnovationsin the cultureDevelopment and Reproductionofsocialintelligence (Social Technologiesof intellectual property)The social functions of scienceReproduction of scientific communitiesScience- one ofthe channels of masssocial movements,social mobilitySelf-realizationof the scientistThe socio-political function ofscienceImprove the country's image

Figure 1 - The functions of science in modern society

Periodization of Science of Kazakhstan

Ranked periodization of science in Kazakhstan, we are based on an analysis of scientifi c literature, scientific instruments of state policy, as well as analyzing and summarizing the experience of scientific activity during the 20 years of independence.

The materials of JSC „National Scientific and Technical Information“ (2011) is a chronicle of the development of science in Kazakhstan 5-year intervals: 1991–1996, 1996–2001, 2001–2006, 2006–2011 without specifying the names of the stages. It addresses in detail the adoption of new instruments, changes in science policy, etc. This is one of the fi rst publications on the system of re ection and evaluation of the trajectory and the vector of development of science in Kazakhstan for 20 years.

The most well-known analytical reports on the development of science in Kazakhstan were previously presented in the papers, B.A. Kembaeva and Y. Komleva (1999) and others, about the current state and problems of scientifi c activity, K.A. Sagadiev, Z. Mansurov, A.K. Abdymomunov, Suleimenov E. (2005), B.T. Jumagulov, etc.

We have identified three stages of development of science:

1991–2000 – The crisis of science in Kazakhstan;

2001–2006 – Stabilization of the development of science;

2007 – to date – the strategic development of science, aimed at industrial and innovative development, and becoming one of the 50 most competitive countries in the world.

Social Science Institute in Kazakhstan inherited from the Soviet era complex system: academic, industry, university and plant science network of research institutes, laboratories, universities, and other indicators the number of shots were close to the leading countries in the world. Well-known scientific schools were formed.

Over 20 years of independence was made three generations of the laws of science.

RK Law „On Scienceand Science and TechnologyPolicy“, 1992RK Law„On Science“, 2001RK Law„On Science“, 2011

Figure 2 - Three generations of the Laws „On Science“

First Law of RK „On Science and Science and Technology Policy“ was adopted January 15, 1992, he was replaced by the Law of RK “On Science” from July 9, 2001 February 18, 2011 adopted a new Law „On Science“ third generation.

The first law was aimed at creating an independent national science and technology policy and management science of the country. The transition from administrative to a task-target method of planning and research funding was realized. Since 1995 has been implemented regulatory and methodological framework, the system of state registration of scientific programs, the state introduced a system of independent scientific and technical expertise, formed the first national research centers. In 1999 he founded the Higher Scientific and Technical Committee – an advisory body under the Government of Kazakhstan (based on the NC STI, 2011).

In 1990–1997 as a percentage of GDP spending on science indicators decreased from 0.8% in 1990 to 0.24% in 1997 In addition, during the 90s – a period of in ation, delayed funding, reduce funding for the year (with respect to planned). The number of research workers has declined by almost 3 times the cost of R & D of 6.6 times.

In 2000 it adopted a new concept of science and technology policy in Kazakhstan.

The beginning of the second period is marked by the adoption of the new Law on Science, 2001. Stabilize funding for science and research. In academic circles, discuss a new version of the management of science-based models of Finland, the USA and other countries. In 2002 the Law „On innovation activity“, which determines the main directions, principles and shapes of the implementation of state policy innovation, was passed. In 2003, the National Academy of Sciences became a public organization; its institutions were transferred to the line ministries.

In 2003 developed and adopted a strategy of industrial-innovative development of Kazakhstan till 2015, set the tone for the development of economy and science.

In our opinion, this is a turning point, giving the vector of the strategic development of our state. All government policies, government programs of various sectors under the control and co-directed this vector.

It creates the National Innovation System, established fi ve development institutions - the Development Bank of Kazakhstan, the Investment Fund, the National Innovation Fund, Center for Engineering and Technology Transfer, National Insurance Corporation for Export Credit and Investment. In 2006, President Nursultan Nazarbayev announced in his message to the people of Kazakhstan „Strategy of Kazakhstan’s top 50 most competitive countries in the world. Kazakhstan on the threshold of a new leap forward in its development“ (Nazarbayev, 2006).

Macroeconomic analysis of technological development in Kazakhstan showed that the proportion of new scientific production in GDP in these years does not exceed 1.1%, the activity of enterprises for the production of scientific output – 2.3%.

A new period of strategic development begins with the adoption of State Program of Science of the RK for 2007–2012.

Purpose of the program – to achieve competitiveness and balance of science, providing acquisition, generation and transmission of knowledge, demand for sustainable socio-economic development. According to the program plan to achieve the share of spending on science in 2015 at the level of developed countries (2.5% of GDP).

In 2010, Kazakhstan adopted a new program of forced industrial-innovative development for 2010-2014. In 2011 a new law of RK „On Science“ was passed. It implements a new model of management science: science funding „basic funding + software + targeted funding grant funding“, entered the national research councils in areas of science in the domestic and foreign scientists, attracting private sector funding for research, introduces the status of „research university“. National Center of State Scientifi c and Technical Expertise (based on the NC STI, 2011) was created. Note that the State Program for Development of Science of Kazakhstan has lost its force in accordance with Presidential Decree of 01.04.2011 1179. New directions for the development of science defined by the law of science in 2011. Already in 2012 increased funding for research, identifi ed five new scientifi c development priorities: energy, deep processing of raw materials and products, information and telecommunications technologies; life sciences, intellectual potential of the country.

It should be emphasized policy change training of the teaching staff. In accordance with the accession to the Bologna process in 2011, terminated the protection of the Soviet system, candidates and doctors of sciences, the transition to training doctors PhD.

Periodization of university research in independent Kazakhstan

Because we represent the branch of university research, we consider the transformation of the article, especially high school science in Kazakhstan since independence. The peculiarity of such a periodization of university science, the difference in the boundary of the second and third period, due to the transformation of the system of training of the teaching staff. Postgraduate stage began postgraduate education in 2005 started training doctors PhD, in 2011, as noted above, the end all of protection to the Soviet system, candidates and doctors of science.

The development of university research in the period of Kazakhstan’s independence can also be divided into three stages.

I period – from late 1991 to 2000. Trend and policy of preserving the traditions of Kazakh University research in the difficult economic period in the development of Kazakhstan (the economic crisis, the emergence of statehood). Unstable funding of university research, in ation, downsizing, etc. Universities looking for additional sources of funding from international foundations of science, etc.

II period – 2000 to 2004. – Stabilization of the financial situation in the fi nancing of science, the relative independence in the development of university science, defined by the institutions. The preliminary stage of preparation of the transformation of scientific training of the graduate school - to a new system of doctoral research training „master’s degree – Doctor of Philosophy“ in accordance with the direction of integration into the global educational and research space.

III period – from 2005 to present – the strategic development of science in Kazakhstan and high school science in particular. Active integration into the global scientific and educational space. Implementation of training doctors PhD. Priorities for Development of Education and Science: focus on the formation of a competitive nation and the project „Intelligent Nation“ President of the Republic of Kazakhstan Nursultan Nazarbayev.

The economic crisis (the fall of economic ties, the destruction of the planned economy), the transition to a market economy, the political crisis (collapse of the Soviet Union), the creation of independent states, the emergence of independent Kazakhstan have been exacerbated by the crisis in the productive forces and the transition to a new technological structure. In the 90’s there is a dual trend: a general fall in spending on science and education in economic development and growth in the number of educational organizations, expanding the network of universities. However, most universities do not have the real sector of scientific research. Has been optimized network of regional public universities, which the merger becomes universities. Traditions of research remain just only in the oldest universities in Kazakhstan.

If we consider the Kazakh universities, research institutes, which as relatively autonomous, self-financing units appear in the Kazakh National University in the early 90s of the twentieth century. In the XXI century under conditions of independence of Kazakhstan, the reform of science and, based on the experience of developed countries, Kazakh national and public universities everywhere are research institutes. Thus, actively taken over and improved the experience of research universities. Moreover, are prerequisites for the specifi c innovation environments in accordance with the direction of the innovation economy of Kazakhstan.

The distinctive features of high school science in the period of independence: greater autonomy of universities for the development of science and fi nancing, which proved the competitiveness of university research in the new environment, the active involvement of international organizations, grants, funds and programs, conservation management science departments (patent offi ces, scientifi c information); creation of independent research institutes at universities, the creation of science and technology parks as an attempt to strengthen the implementation of R & D in manufacturing (Mynbayeva, 2010).

With globalization, manifested the need to strengthen the international activities of universities in several directions: intensifi cation of joint R & D, activation of publications of research results in international leading journals in foreign languages, increasing participation of scientists of universities in international forums and conferences, presentations, etc.

Large reserve of university science is a human capacity, as well as a wide network of universities, are generally well distributed over the territory of Kazakhstan. The existing system is a diversified science in Kazakhstan in a competitive environment for research promotes the development of science. University sector science has proven vitality and competitiveness through the established traditions for nearly a century of scientific development in Kazakhstan.

Summary and Conclusions

Kazakhstan's policy is focused on innovation development of economy in line with global trends. Economic growth is directly linked to the development of science and innovation in society. Scientific and scientific-technical policy of the state actually contributes to the development as a vector alignment and consolidation of the scientists and the exchange of ideas, knowledge and experiences between States. Vector construction of industrial and innovation-based economy, the competitiveness of the state, entering into the world of scientific and educational environment requires strengthening the social institution of science and scientifi c sectors. Therefore, it is important to understand the format of contemporary reform of science, in a landmark move to end.

Analysis of the trajectory of development of Kazakhstan for 20 years of independence shows the complexity of the distance traveled, major uctuations in science policy. Three stages of development of science – crisis, stabilization and translational motion are marked. To determine the steps for further development of Kazakhstan has actively studied the experience of leading foreign countries, a few times to assess the development of foreign Science. For example, in 2002 – an international audit of science, in 2011-2012 to the examination of applications for the research systemically attract foreign professionals. Traditions of international partnership in the new modern stage quality are increasing. It helped to look at the research with fresh eyes, objectively identify strengths and weaknesses of the Science of Kazakhstan, to determine the vectors of further development.

The complex phases of the crisis and renewed formation of science were all CIS countries, Eastern European countries. We hope that familiarity with the experience of Kazakhstan, exchange of experience can help further development of effective states.

Science of Kazakhstan continues to wait for major changes that would require consolidation of the state, the scientific community and the partners of Kazakhstan.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

A Brief Chronicle of Science of Kazakhstan’s independence. (2011). According to the materials of “National Center of Scientifi c and Technical Information”. The popular science magazine “element”, 6/12

http:// elementmag.kz /? p = 41744

Abdymomunov, A. Report of the Working Group Leader. Deputy Minister of Education and Science at Meeting on the Management of Science. RK - http://www.edu.gov.kz

Abdymomunov, A., Suleimenov, E. & Ramankulov, E. (2005). The new agenda of Kazakhstan science. High School Science and Kazakhstan. 01 October. C 6–7.

Kembaev, B., Komlev, Y. (1999). The development of science and technology in Kazakhstan. Almaty: KazgosINTI.

Modern Sociology of Education. (2006). Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix.

Mynbayeva, A.K. (2010). History, theory and technology research activities of higher education: Monograph. Almaty.

Nazarbayev, N.A. (2006). The strategy of becoming one of the 50 most competitive countries in the world. Kazakhstan on the threshold of a new leap forward in its development: Message from the President to the people of Kazakhstan. Astana - http://www.akorda.kz

Osipov, A.M. Sociology of Education: Essays on the theory. (2006). Rostovon-Don: Phoenix.

Национално издателствоАз Буки стартира амбициозна програма за подготовка и публикуване на поредица от разработки, свързани с оценяването в училищното образовани. Програмата ще се реализира съвместно с Центъра за контрол и оценка на качеството на училищното образование към Министерството на образованието, младежта и науката. Тя ще включва текстове за вътрешно и външно оценяване, предназначени за учители, образователни експерти и всички, ангажирани с проблематиката.

Поредицата ще се публикува в обособено приложение на списаниеСтратегии на образователната и научната политика”, издавано отАз Буки”. През 2013 г. научнотеоретичното списание ще излиза в по-голям обем и тираж.

В българската образователна система все още липсват адекватни методи и подходящ инструментариум за оценяване, които да измерват не само получени теоретични знания, но и придобити практически умения, формирани ценности и нагласи у учениците. Оценяването е и най-важно условие за успешно въвеждане на подход, ориентиран към развитие на умения и формиране на ценности.

През 2013 г. всяка от книжките на сп. „Стратегии ще съдържа анализи от научни изследвания на международни и български автори и екипи, ангажирани в сферата на училищното оценяване, както и тенденциите в развитието на оценяването в световен мащаб. Ще се публикуват данни и изводи, свързани с участието на българските ученици в международни сравнителни оценявания. (Програма за международно оценяване на учениците – PISA, Международно изследване на уменията за четене на учениците – PIRLS, Международно изследване на гражданското образование – ICCS, Европейско изследване на чуждоезиковите компетентности – ESLC, Международно изследване за преподаване и учене – TALIS).

Ще има и специална рубрика за предложения, мнения, идеи от практиката, свързани с проблематиката на оценяването. Затова се обръщаме към Васбългарските учители, директори, учени всички, които имат отношение към оценяването в българското образование, да споделяте Вашия опит на страниците на изданията наАз Буки”.

2025 година
Книжка 6
UNLOCKING THE POTENTIAL OF ESG AND AI IN HIGHER EDUCATION FINANCE: INSIGHTS FROM A STUDY ACROSS FIVE EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

Tina Vukasović, Rok Strašek, Liliya Terzieva;, Elenita Velikova, Justyna Tomala, Maria Urbaniec, Jarosław Pawlik, Michael Murg, Anita Maček

THE ROLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION FOR THE PROFESSIONAL REALIZATION OF STUDENTS – PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS

Anny Atanasova, Viktoriya Kalaydzhieva, Radostina Yuleva-Chuchulayna, Kalina Durova-Angelova

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
ТРАНСФОРМАЦИИ НА ПАЗАРА НА ТРУДА И НУЖДАТА ОТ ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИ РЕФОРМИ

Ваня Иванова, Андрей Василев, Калоян Ганев, Ралица Симеонова-Ганева

Книжка 3
FORMING ENTREPRENEURIAL CULTURE THROUGH EDUCATION

Milena Filipova, Adriana Atanasova

Книжка 2s
THE STATE OF INCLUSION IN ADAPTED BASKETBALL

Stefka Djobova, Ivelina Kirilova

Книжка 2
MODEL OF PROFESSIONALLY DIRECTED TRAINING OF FUTURE ENGINEER-TEACHERS

Ivan Beloev, Valentina Vasileva, Іnna Savytska, Oksana Bulgakova, Lesia Zbaravska, Olha Chaikovska

DETERMINANTS AFFECTING ACADEMIC STAFF SATISFACTION WITH ONLINE LEARNING IN HIGHER MEDICAL EDUCATION

Miglena Tarnovska, ;, Rumyana Stoyanova, ;, Angelina Kirkova-Bogdanova;, Rositsa Dimova

Книжка 1s
AN INNOVATIVE MODEL FOR DEVELOPING DIGITAL COMPETENCES OF SOCIAL WORKERS

Lyudmila Vekova, Tanya Vazova, Penyo Georgiev, Ekaterina Uzhikanova-Kovacheva

Книжка 1
2024 година
Книжка 6s
DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES RISK MANAGEMENT

Miglena Molhova-Vladova, Ivaylo B. Ivanov

Книжка 6
AN INTEGRATIVE APPROACH TO ORGANIZING THE FORMATION OF STUDENTS’ COGNITIVE INDEPENDENCE IN CONDITIONS OF INTENSIFICATION OF LEARNING ACTIVITIES

Albina Volkotrubova, Aidai Kasymova, Zoriana Hbur, Antonina Kichuk, Svitlana Koshova, Svitlana Khodakivska

ИНОВАТИВЕН МОДЕЛ НА ПРОЕКТНО БАЗИРАНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ НА ГИМНАЗИАЛНИ УЧИТЕЛИ: ДОБРА ПРАКТИКА ОТ УниБИТ

Жоржета Назърска, Александър Каракачанов, Магдалена Гарванова, Нина Дебрюне

Книжка 5s
КОНЦЕПТУАЛНА РАМКА ЗА ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА ИЗКУСТВЕНИЯ ИНТЕЛЕКТ ВЪВ ВИСШЕТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Акад. Христо Белоев, Валентина Войноховска, Ангел Смрикаров

ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ ПРИЛОЖИМОСТТА НА БЛОКОВИ ВЕРИГИ ОТ ПЪРВО НИВО (L1) В СИСТЕМА ЗА ЕЛЕКТРОННО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Андриан Минчев, Ваня Стойкова, Галя Шивачева, Доц Анелия Иванова

ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВА ПРИ ПРОМЯНА НА ПЛАТФОРМИ ЗА ДИСТАНЦИОННО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Антон Недялков, Милена Кирова, Мирослава Бонева

APPLICATION OF ZSPACE TECHNOLOGY IN THE DISCIPLINES OF THE STEM CYCLE

Boyana Ivanova, Kamelia Shoilekova, Desislava Atanasova, Rumen Rusev

TEACHERS' ADAPTATION TO CHANGES IN AN INCREASINGLY COMPLEX WORLD THROUGH THE USE OF AI

Zhanat Nurbekova, Kanagat Baigusheva, Kalima Tuenbaeva, Bakyt Nurbekov, Tsvetomir Vassilev

АТОСЕКУНДНОТО ОБУЧЕНИЕ – МЕТАФОРА НА ДНЕШНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Юлия Дончева, Денис Асенов, Ангел Смрикаров, Цветомир Василев

Книжка 5
Книжка 4s
Книжка 4
MANAGERIAL ASPECTS OF COOPERATION AMONG HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THEIR STAKEHOLDERS

Olha Prokopenko, Svitlana Perova, Tokhir Rakhimov, Mykola Kunytskyi, Iryna Leshchenko

Книжка 3s
Книжка 3
Книжка 2
FORMATION OF PROFESSIONAL SKILLS OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERS DURING LABORATORY PRACTICE WHEN STUDYING FUNDAMENTAL SCIENCE

Ivan Beloev, Oksana Bulgakova, Oksana Zakhutska, Maria Bondar, Lesia Zbaravska

ИМИДЖ НА УНИВЕРСИТЕТА

Галя Христозова

Книжка 1s
COMPETITIVENESS AS A RESULT OF CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION

Nikolay Krushkov, Ralitza Zayakova-Krushkova

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND SECURITY IN THE INTEGRATED CIRCUITS INDUSTRY

Ivan Nachev, Yuliana Tomova, Iskren Konstantinov, Marina Spasova

Книжка 1
PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Milena Filipova, Olha Prokopenko, Igor Matyushenko, Olena Khanova, Olga Shirobokova, Ardian Durmishi

2023 година
Книжка 6s
DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMON INFORMATION SYSTEM TO CREATE A DIGITAL CAREER CENTER TOGETHER WITH PARTNER HIGHER SCHOOLS

Yordanka Angelova, Rossen Radonov, Vasil Kuzmov, Stela Zhorzh Derelieva-Konstantinova

DRAFTING A DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION STRATEGY FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT SECTOR – EMPIRICAL STUDY ON UAE

Mounir el Khatib, Shikha al Ali, Ibrahim Alharam, Ali Alhajeri, Gabriela Peneva, Jordanka Angelova, Mahmoud Shanaa

VOYAGE OF LEARNING: CRUISE SHIPS WEATHER ROUTING AND MARITIME EDUCATION

Svetlana Dimitrakieva, Dobrin Milev, Christiana Atanasova

СТРУКТУРНИ ПРОМЕНИ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО НА МЕНИДЖЪРИ ЗА ИНДУСТРИЯ 5.0

Недко Минчев, Венета Христова, Иван Стоянов

RESEARCH OF THE INNOVATION CAPACITY OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS

Siya Veleva, ; Margarita Mondeshka, Anka Tsvetanova

Книжка 6
Книжка 5s
ВИДОВЕ ТРАВМИ В ПАРАШУТИЗМА И ПРЕВЕНЦИЯТА ИМ

Капитан III ранг Георги Калинов

Книжка 5
Книжка 4s
DETERMINING THE DEGREE OF DIGITALIZATION OF A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION

Acad. Hristo Beloev, Angel Smrikarov, Valentina Voinohovska, Galina Ivanova

ОТ STEM КЪМ BEST: ДВА СТАНДАРТА, ЕДНА ЦЕЛ

Андрей Захариев, Стефан Симеонов, Таня Тодорова

Книжка 4
EFFECT OF RESILIENCE ON BURNOUT IN ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

Radina Stoyanova, Sonya Karabeliova, Petya Pandurova, Nadezhda Zheckova, Kaloyan Mitev

Книжка 3s
INTELLIGENT ANIMAL HUSBANDRY: FARMER ATTITUDES AND A ROADMAP FOR IMPLEMENTATION

Dimitrios Petropoulos, Koutroubis Fotios, Petya Biolcheva, Evgeni Valchev

Книжка 3
STUDY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE USE OF COMMUNICATIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS OF ENGINEERS TRAINING

Ivan Beloev, Valentina Vasileva, Sergii Bilan, Maria Bondar, Oksana Bulgakova, Lyubov Shymko

Книжка 2
РАЗПОЛОЖЕНИЕ НА ВИСШИТЕ УЧИЛИЩА В БЪЛГАРИЯ В КОНТЕКСТА НА ФОРМИРАНЕ НА ПАЗАРА НА ТРУДА

Цветелина Берберова-Вълчева, Камен Петров, Николай Цонков

Книжка 1
MODERNIZATION OF THE CONTENT OF THE LECTURE COURSE IN PHYSICS FOR TRAINING FUTURE AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERS

Ivan Beloev, Valentina Vasileva, Vasyl Shynkaruk, Oksana Bulgakova, Maria Bondar, Lesia Zbaravska, Sergii Slobodian

2022 година
Книжка 6
ORGANIZATION OF AN INCLUSIVE EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT FOR THE STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS

Halyna Bilavych, Nataliia Bakhmat, Tetyana Pantiuk, Mykola Pantiuk, Borys Savchuk

ДИГИТАЛИЗАЦИЯ НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО В БЪЛГАРИЯ: СЪСТОЯНИЕ И ОБЩИ ТЕНДЕНЦИИ

Теодора Върбанова, Албена Вуцова, Николай Нетов

Книжка 5
ПРАВОТО НА ИЗБОР В ЖИВОТА НА ДЕЦАТА В РЕПУБЛИКА БЪЛГАРИЯ

Сийка Чавдарова-Костова, Даниела Рачева, Екатерина Томова, Росица Симеонова

Книжка 4
DIAGNOSIS AS A TOOL FOR MONITORING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ADDICTION PREVENTION IN ADOLESCENTS

O.A. Selivanova, N.V. Bystrova, I.I. Derecha, T.S. Mamontova, O.V. Panfilova

Книжка 3
ПУБЛИЧНОТО РАЗБИРАНЕ НА НАУКАТА В МРЕЖОВИЯ СВЯТ

Светломир Здравков, Мартин Й. Иванов, Петя Климентова

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
ДИГИТАЛНАТА ИНТЕРАКЦИЯ ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛ – СТУДЕНТ В ОНЛАЙН ОБУЧЕНИЕТО В МЕДИЦИНСКИТЕ УНИВЕРСИТЕТИ

Миглена Търновска, Румяна Стоянова, Боряна Парашкевова, Юлияна Маринова

2021 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
Книжка 4s
SIGNAL FOR HELP

Ina Vladova, Milena Kuleva

Книжка 4
PREMISES FOR A MULTICULTURAL APPROACH TO EDUCATION

Anzhelina Koriakina, Lyudmila Amanbaeva

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
ПЪРВА СЕДМИЦА ДИСТАНЦИОННО ОБУЧЕНИЕ В СУ „ИВАН ВАЗОВ“ В СТАРА ЗАГОРА

Тони Чехларова, Динко Цвятков, Неда Чехларова

Книжка 1
METHODOLOGY OF SAFETY AND QUALITY OF LIFE ON THE BASIS OF NOOSPHERIC EDUCATION SYSTEM FORMATION

Nataliia Bakhmat, Nataliia Ridei, Nataliia Tytova, Vladyslava Liubarets, Oksana Katsero

2020 година
Книжка 6
HIGHER EDUCATION AS A PUBLIC GOOD

Yulia Nedelcheva, Miroslav Nedelchev

Книжка 5
НАСЪРЧАВАНЕ НА СЪТРУДНИЧЕСТВОТО МЕЖДУ ВИСШИТЕ УЧИЛИЩА И БИЗНЕСА

Добринка Стоянова, Блага Маджурова, Гергана Димитрова, Стефан Райчев

Книжка 4
THE STRATEGY OF HUMAN RIGHTS STUDY IN EDUCATION

Anush Balian, Nataliya Seysebayeva, Natalia Efremova, Liliia Danylchenko

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
МИГРАЦИЯ И МИГРАЦИОННИ ПРОЦЕСИ

Веселина Р. Иванова

SOCIAL STATUS OF DISABLED PEOPLE IN RUSSIA

Elena G. Pankova, Tatiana V. Soloveva, Dinara A. Bistyaykina, Olga M. Lizina

Книжка 1
ETHNIC UPBRINGING AS A PART OF THE ETHNIC CULTURE

Sholpankulova Gulnar Kenesbekovna

2019 година
Книжка 6
EMOTIONAL COMPETENCE OF THE SOCIAL TEACHER

Kadisha K. Shalgynbayeva, Ulbosin Zh.Tuyakova

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
УЧИЛИЩЕТО НА БЪДЕЩЕТО

Наталия Витанова

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
POST-GRADUATE QUALIFICATION OF TEACHERS IN INTERCULTURAL EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT

Irina Koleva, Veselin Tepavicharov, Violeta Kotseva, Kremena Yordanova

ДЕЦАТА В КОНСТИТУЦИОННИТЕ НОРМИ НА БЪЛГАРИЯ

Румен Василев, Весела Марева

СЪСТОЯНИЕ НА БЪЛГАРСКОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Анелия Любенова, Любомир Любенов

ЕДИН НОВ УЧЕБНИК

Ирина Колева

2018 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
A NEW AWARD FOR PROFESSOR MAIRA KABAKOVA

Irina Koleva, Editor-in-

Книжка 4
Книжка 3
BLENDED EDUCATION IN HIGHER SCHOOLS: NEW NETWORKS AND MEDIATORS

Nikolay Tsankov, Veska Gyuviyska, Milena Levunlieva

ВЗАИМОВРЪЗКАТА МЕЖДУ СПОРТА И ПРАВОТО

Ивайло Прокопов, Елица Стоянова

ХИМЕРНИТЕ ГРУПИ В УЧИЛИЩЕ

Яна Рашева-Мерджанова

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2017 година
Книжка 6
ЗНАЧИМОСТТА НА УЧЕНЕТО: АНАЛИЗ НА ВРЪЗКИТЕ МЕЖДУ ГЛЕДНИТЕ ТОЧКИ НА УЧЕНИЦИ, РОДИТЕЛИ И УЧИТЕЛИ

Илиана Мирчева, Елена Джамбазова, Снежана Радева, Деян Велковски

Книжка 5
ОРГАНИЗАЦИОННА КУЛТУРА В УЧИЛИЩЕ

Ивайло Старибратов, Лилия Бабакова

Книжка 4
КОУЧИНГ. ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЕН КОУЧИНГ

Наталия Витанова, Нели Митева

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
ЕМПАТИЯ И РЕФЛЕКСИЯ

Нели Кънева, Кристиана Булдеева

2016 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2015 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
Книжка 4
ПРАГМАТИЧНАТА ДИДАКТИКА

Николай Колишев

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2014 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
КОХЕРЕНТНОСТ НА ПОЛИТИКИ

Албена Вуцова, Лиляна Павлова

Книжка 4
USING THE RESULTS OF A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT

Thomas Kellaghan, Vincent Greaney, T. Scott Murray

Книжка 3
USING THE RESULTS OF A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT

Thomas Kellaghan, Vincent Greaney, T. Scott Murray

Книжка 2
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF UNIVERSITY FACULTY: А SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS

Gulnar Toltaevna Balakayeva, Alken Shugaybekovich Tokmagambetov, Sapar Imangalievich Ospanov

USING THE RESULTS OF A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT

Thomas Kellaghan, Vincent Greaney, T. Scott Murray

Книжка 1
РЕФЛЕКСИЯТА В ИНТЕГРАТИВНОТО ПОЛЕ НА МЕТОДИКАТА НА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО ПО БИОЛОГИЯ

Иса Хаджиали, Наташа Цанова, Надежда Райчева, Снежана Томова

USING THE RESULTS OF A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT

Thomas Kellaghan, Vincent Greaney, T. Scott Murray

2013 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
Книжка 4
QUESTIONNAIRE DEVELOPMENT

ÎÖÅÍßÂÀÍÅÒÎ

Книжка 3
MASS MEDIA CULTURE IN KAZAKHSTAN

Aktolkyn Kulsariyeva Yerkin Massanov Indira Alibayeva

РЪКОВОДСТВО ЗА СЪСТАВЯНЕ НА ТЕСТОВЕ*

Фернандо Картрайт, Джери Мусио

РОССИЙСКАЯ СИСТЕМА ОЦЕНКИ КАЧЕСТВА ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ: ГЛАВНЫЕ УРОКИ

В. Болотов / И. Вальдман / Г. Ковалёва / М. Пинская

Книжка 2
ОЦЕНЯВАНЕ НА ГРАЖДАНСКИТЕ КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТИ НА УЧЕНИЦИТЕ: ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВА И ВЪЗМОЖНОСТИ

Светла Петрова Център за контрол и оценка на качеството на училищното образование

РЪКОВОДСТВО ЗА СЪСТАВЯНЕ НА ТЕСТОВЕ*

Фернандо Картрайт, Джери Мусио

Книжка 1
Уважаеми читатели,

вет, както и от международния борд за предоставените статии и студии, за да могат да бъдат идентифицирани в полето на образованието пред широката аудитория от педа- гогически специалисти във всички степени на образователната ни система. Благодаря за техния всеотдаен и безвъзмезден труд да създават и популяризират мрежа от научни съобщества по профила на списанието и да насърчават научните изследвания. Благодаря на рецензентите от национално представените висши училища, на- учни институции и

РЪКОВОДСТВО ЗА СЪСТАВЯНЕ НА ТЕСТОВЕ

Фернандо Картрайт, Джери Мусио

2012 година
Книжка 6
DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE IN KAZAKHSTAN IN THE PERIOD OF INDEPENDENCE

Aigerim Mynbayeva Maira Kabakova Aliya Massalimova

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
СИСТЕМАТА ЗА РАЗВИТИЕ НА АКАДЕМИЧНИЯ СЪСТАВ НА РУСЕНСКИЯ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ „АНГЕЛ КЪНЧЕВ“

Христо Белоев, Ангел Смрикаров, Орлин Петров, Анелия Иванова, Галина Иванова

Книжка 2
ПРОУЧВАНЕ НА РОДИТЕЛСКОТО УЧАСТИЕ В УЧИЛИЩНИЯ ЖИВОТ В БЪЛГАРИЯ

* Този материал е изготвен въз основа на резултатите от изследването „Parental Involvement in Life of School Matters“, проведено в България в рамките на проек- та „Advancing Educational Inclusion and Quality in South East Europe“, изпълняван

ВТОРИ ФОРУМ ЗА СТРАТЕГИИ В НАУКАТА

Тошка Борисова В края на 2011 г. в София се проведе второто издание на Форум за страте- гии в науката. Основната тема бе повишаване на международната видимост и разпознаваемост на българската наука. Форумът се организира от „Elsevier“ – водеща компания за разработване и предоставяне на научни, технически и медицински информационни продукти и услуги , с подкрепата на Министер- ството на образованието, младежта и науката. След успеха на първото издание на Форума за стратегии в науката през

Книжка 1
РЕЙТИНГИ, ИНДЕКСИ, ПАРИ

Боян Захариев