Стратегии на образователната и научната политика

https://doi.org/10.53656/str2023-6s-8-imp

2023/6s, стр. 94 - 102

IMPACT OF THE PUBLICIZATION OF CORPORATE CULTURE ON THE INTERNET ON THE FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC INDICATORS OF COURIER COMPANIES IN BULGARIA

Ilian Minkov
OrcID: 0009-0000-3426-1880
E-mail: minkov@ue-varna.bg
University of Economics – Varna
Yordan Ivanov
OrcID: 0009-0004-7940-4338
E-mail: jordan.ivanov@ue-varna.bg
University of Economics – Varna

Резюме: In the current conditions of a dynamic and highly competitive market environment, the official corporate culture of companies published online plays an essential role in building up their image. However, the question of importance for the managers of business organizations is whether and to what extent the scope of publicization of corporate culture elements affects their market performance and financial and economic results. The purpose of this study is to establish the relationship between the degree of development of the publicized corporate culture of courier companies in Bulgaria and the level of their profitability as a key financial and economic indicator. The results show that, depending on the nature of the proclaimed elements, the publicized corporate culture exerts between a weak and a significant influence on the sales revenue of the studied companies.

Ключови думи: corporate culture; publicized corporate culture; profitability; courier companies

Introduction

The corporate culture of business organizations, part of their intellectual capital (Panayotova 2019), plays an essential role in identifying them in the eyes of partners from the surrounding environment and building a unique corporate image. An important contribution to this is the official culture published on the Internet, which presents in the online space the visible cultural attributes of the organizations, publicly expressed as unique company documents – vision, mission, motto, credo, declaration of company values, etc. (Dimitrov, Ivanov & Geshkov 2018). Undoubtedly, publicized culture significantly aids companies’ efforts to distinguish themselves from one another, but the question arises as to what extent the building up of this culture contributes to improving market performance and financial and economic results. The research conducted so far does not provide a clear answer to this question. The studies of Sufy&Lyons (2003), Dermol (2012), Braun et al. (2012) conclude that there is no relationship between published corporate culture and company success. At the same time, the studies of Bart, Bontis & Taggar (2001), Hirota et al. (2010), Rajasekar (2013) and others prove that the degree of development of the elements of the proclaimed culture has a positive effect on company performance. Based on these results, it can be assumed that that the absence or presence of such dependence and its strength and direction depend to a large extent on the economic sector in which business organizations operate. In view of this, the aim of the study is to establish the relationship between the degree of development of the publicized corporate culture of the courier companies in Bulgaria and the level of their profitability as a key financial and economic indicator.

The object of research were the official websites and financial reports of eight leading companies in the courier sector in Bulgaria: Econt Express, Speedy, DHL Bulgaria, Bulgarian Posts, MIBM Express, In Time, TNT Bulgaria and Transpress (Table 1).

Table 1. Courier companies included in the study

Leading courier companies• Econt Express – https://www.econt.com/• Speedy – https://www.speedy.bg/• DHLBulgaria – http://www.dhl.bg/• Bulgarian Posts – https://www.bgpost.bg/• MIBM Express – https://www.mbm-express.com/• In Time – https://intime.bg/• TNTBulgaria – https://www.tnt.com/• Transpress – https://www.transpress.bg/Source: Compiled by the authors

1. Level of publicization of corporate culture

1.1. A methodological toolkit for determining the level of publicization of corporate culture

In this study, the degree of development of the corporate culture publicized on the Internet is determined by the coefficient (in %) of publicization of the elements of this culture (mission, vision, values/principles, business credo, motto, company history, corporate social responsibility, code of ethics). This involves the determination of the following coefficients:

(1) Coefficient of disclosing all elements of the publicized corporate culture for each company in the sector

\(Kd=\tfrac{A t}{8} \times 100~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ {(1)}\)

where: \(A t\)– number of elements in the publicized corporate culture, disclosed by company \(t(t \in(1 \div n))\);

\(n\)– total number of companies in the sector.

On this basis, the average integral coefficient of disclosure of the elements of publicized corporate culture for the business sector is determined, as an arithmetic mean of the individual coefficients of individual companies:

\(Kd \text { sect. }=\tfrac{\sum_{t \in 1}^{n} \kappa d t}{n} \times 100~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ {(2)}\)

(2) Coefficient of disclosure of the main elements of publicized corporate culture for each company in the sector

\(Kd \operatorname{main}=\tfrac{B t}{3} \times 100~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ {(3)}\)

Bt corporate closed by company \(t \in(1 \div n)\) ).

On this basis, two average integral disclosure coefficients of the main elements of publicized corporate culture for the business sector are determined:

– on the basis of all companies in the sector, as an arithmetic average of the individual coefficients of the individual companies:

\(\mathrm{Kd} \text { main sect. }=\tfrac{\sum_{t \in 1}^{n} \kappa d \text { main } t}{n} \times 100~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ {(4)}\)

where \(n\)– total number of the companies in the sector

– Based only on the companies from the sector that disclosed the main elements of publicized corporate culture as an arithmetic mean of the individual coefficients of the individual companies:

\(Kd^{\prime} \text { main sect. }=\tfrac{\sum_{t \in 1}^{n} \kappa d \text { main } t}{m} \times 100~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ {(5)}\)

\(m\)– total number of companies in the sector that have disclosed the main elements of publicized corporate culture.

1.2. Evaluation of the level of publicization of the corporate culture of courier companies.

Based on the number of elements (primary and in total) of the publicized corporate culture announced by the courier companies, the publicization ratio is determined for each company and for the sector as a whole (Table 2).

Table 2. Level of publicization of the elements (primary and in total) of the published company culture by courier companies in Bulgaria

CompanyTotal elementspublicizedPrimary elementspublicizedKd (%)Kd main (%)Bulgarian Posts1012.50DHLBulgaria212533.33Econt Express5362.5100In Time20250MIBM Express4350100Speedy425066.67TNT Bulgaria1012.50Transpress5362.5100Kd sect.37.5Kd main sect.50Kd main sect..80

Source: Compiled by the authors based on information from the official websites of the companies

The integral publicization ratio of culture elements for the sector is \(37.5 \%\), which shows that each company publicizes an average of 3 elements. The highest level of publicization is identified in Econt Express and Transpress, with a coefficient of \(62.5 \%\) formed by five proclaimed elements. The lowest possible ratio of \(12.5 \%\) is observed in Bulgarian Posts and TNT Bulgaria, which announced only one element.

The integral ratio of publicization of primary elements in all companies in the sector is \(50 \%\), indicating that each company publishes an average of one and a half primary elements on the Internet. Econt Express, MIBM Express and Transpress have a maximum ratio of \(100 \%\)-they having built and publicized a fully completed portfolio of primary elements. At the same time, a ratio of 0 is observed in the case of Bulgarian Posts, In Time and TNT Bulgaria, which have not proclaimed a mission, vision or values. Based only on courier companies that have proclaimed primary elements (5 organizations), the ratio is \(80 \%\).

2. Analysis of the profitability of courier companies

2.1. Methodological toolkit for profitability analysis

Profitability is an economic category that can be used to measure the efficiency of a company’s business. That is why a number of researchers are looking for a relationship between profitability ratios and various manifestations of a company’s business. As Kostova (2010, p. 208) argues, “profitability ratios are quantitative characteristics of the efficiency of revenues and expenses, assets, liabilities, and equity”. Due to the fact that this definition of the scope of profitability indicators includes mainly economic and financial categories that are quantifiable, the question arises whether it is possible to identify a link between similar relative indicators of quantifiable economic indicators of business and others, characterizing social, management and other aspects of the companies’ business. Different interpretations of the varieties of profitability indicators are known in the literature (Petrov, G. et al., 2006, p. 213), but for the purposes of this study, we will use the profitability indicator of sales revenue (Kostova, 2010, p. 208):

– profitability of revenue (commercial profitability);

(6)\[ R_{\text {prof }(T R)}=\tfrac{G P r}{N T R} \times 100,(\%) \]

where,

\(\mathrm{R}_{\text {prof(TR) }}\)– gross revenue profitability ratio;

GPr – gross profit (loss) of the company;

NTR – Net Sales Revenue.

2.2. Profitability of courier companies in Bulgaria

The calculation of the profitability of the courier companies was carried out on the basis of the methodology presented above, using data from the annual financial statements and activity reports published on the page of the Commercial Register at the Registry Agency. The indicators for the selected companies were determined based on the data for 2021, and the revenues profitability ratio was calculated for each company (table 3).

Table 3. Profitability of the revenues of courier companies in Bulgaria for 2021 (thousand BGN)

CompanyTRTCPrRprof(TR)Bulgarian Post233548245201-11653-5%DHLBulgaria12035611725730993%Econt Express2683732351883318512%In Time206131934612676%MIBM Express1558317084-1501-10%Speedy3348502944584039212%TNT Bulgaria48594476329622%Transpress17347165547935%

Source: Commercial register at the Registry Agency

The data show that the two leading courier companies in Bulgaria have identical revenue profitability ratios, while two of the companies, due to reported losses, have negative ratios.

3. Interrelation between the level of publicization of the corporate culture elements (primary and in total) and the profitability of companies

3.1. Methodological toolkit

The relationship between the level of publicization of the corporate culture elements (primary and in total) and the profitability ratios of the studied companies can be defined not as functional, but as causal. This, as some authors point out (Radilov, Hadzhiev, Zhekova 2010), constitutes a relationship that “reflects the interaction between processes, where one of them predetermines the condition and behaviour of others”. If there are two variables (conventionally called dependent and independent) for which matrix data are available, the degree of their dependence can be characterized by the classical Pearson-Brave linear correlation coefficient.

(7)\[ r=\tfrac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}\left(X_{i}-X\right)\left(Y_{i}-Y\right)}{(n-1) s_{x} s_{y}}, \]

The simple linear correlation is part of parametric methods, which means that it should be applied to normally distributed parametric series. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the type of data series and distribution using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Two Sample Test.

The statistical significance of the simple linear correlation coefficient is manifested using the classical method of statistical hypotheses testing. The two hypotheses are of the type (Radilov, Hadzhiev, Zhekova, 2010, p. 220):

\(H_{0}: \rho=0\) (assumption of zero effect of the factor on the result)

\(H_{1}: \rho \neq 0\) (the alternative hypothesis is opposite to the null hypothesis)

The empirical characterization of Null Hypothesis Testing

(8)\[ t=\tfrac{r}{s_{r}}=r \sqrt{\tfrac{n-2}{1-r^{2}}} \]

The decision to accept or reject the null hypothesis is based on the comparison between the empirical and theoretical characteristics of t-distribution, obtained from the table, at a chosen level of significance and degree of freedom \(n-2\).

3.2. Results of the study

The present study of the presence of a correlation between the publicized elements of corporate culture and the profitability of the revenues of courier companies in Bulgaria assumes a risk of error of the first order \(\alpha=0.05\), which we believe reflects fully the risks that may arise from a distortion of the results caused by the small number of respondents and the way the sample was formed.

The results of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Two Sample Test (table 4), as well as the assumed risk of first-order error, give us reason to conclude that the distribution is normal.

Table 4. Kolmogorov-Smirnov Two Sample Test

Ratioof publicization ofall elementsRatioof publicization ofprimary elementsRevenueprotabilityNNormal Parameters a, bMeanStd. DeviationMost Extreme Di󰀨erencesAbsolutelyPositiveNegativeKolmogorov-Smirnov ZAsymp. Sig. (2-tailed)837,500021,12886,223,223-,223,631,821850,000047,14079,231,231-,231,652,7898,0312,07643,191,123-,191,542,931

a. Test distribution is Normal b. Calculated from data

The conclusions drawn regarding the type of distribution of the data in the statistical series give us reason to make calculations and assumptions about the hypotheses as follows:

\(H_{0}\)– there is no statistically significant correlation between the corporate culture elements (primary and in total) published on the Internet and revenue profitability.

\(H_{1}\)– there is a statistically significant correlation between the corporate culture elements (primary and in total) published on the Internet and revenue profitability.

Table 5. Correlation between publicized corporate culture elements in total and revenue profitability.

ValueAsymp.Std. ErroraApprox. TbApprox. Sig.Interval by IntervalPearson’s R,365,295,960,374cOrdinal by OrdinalSpearman Correlation,515,2661,473,191cN of Valid Cases8

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis c. Based on normal approximation

The obtained results show unequivocally that the null hypothesis cannot be accepted, and the results of the Pearson and Spearman coefficients presented in Table 5 range between moderately strong and significantly strong correlation between the factor and dependent variables, respectively.

Table 6. Correlation between publicized primary corporate culture elements and revenue profitability

ValueAsymp. Std. ErroraApprox. TbApprox. Sig.Interval by IntervalPearson’s R,139,374,343,743cOrdinal by OrdinalSpearman Correlation,201,398,504,632cN of Valid Cases8

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis c. Based on normal approximation

The data from the correlation analysis of the second indicator related to the publicization of the primary elements of corporate culture show clearly again that the null hypothesis of no correlation cannot be accepted. A correlation between them exists, but it should rather be defined as a weak one.

4. Conclusions

Based on the study of existence of a correlation between the degree of development of the publicized corporate culture of courier companies in Bulgaria and the level of their profitability, the following conclusions can be drawn:

1. Depending on the nature of the elements published on the Internet, the publicized corporate culture has between a weak and a significant influence on the profitability of the sales revenue of courier companies in Bulgaria.

2. A stronger correlation between the two variables is observed at the level of publicization of all elements of culture than only the primary ones.

Based on the obtained results, it can be concluded that the degree of publicization of the corporate culture of courier companies in Bulgaria is essential for their market performance, respectively for the generated revenues and level of profitability. However, it is noteworthy that a properly constructed and publicized portfolio of all (primary and secondary) cultural elements contributes more in this regard than the proclamation of only mission, vision and/or values/principles. In view of this, the management of courier companies could gain from the recommendation to purposefully develop and publicize on the Internet a balanced and mutually complementary set of primary and secondary elements of official culture. As a result of the synergy between them, a multiplier effect on the image of these companies can be expected.

REFERENCES

DIMITROV, K., IVANOV, I., GESHKOV, M., 2018. Corporate culture publicized in the virtual space. Sofia: UNWE Publishing Complex.

KOSTOVA, N., 2010. Financial and accounting analysis. Varna: Aktiv-K OOD.

KURSHUMOV, V., 2017. Operational programmes as a source of financing for the development of courier companies in Bulgaria. Collection “Modern logistics – business and education”, Varna: Science and Economics.

PETROV, G., et al., 2006. Corporate Finance. Sofia: Trakia-M.

RADILOV, D., HADZHIEV, V., ZHEKOVA, S., 2010. Statistics, “Science and Economics”. Varna: UE.

BART, C., BONTIS, N., TAGGAR, S., 2001. A Model of the Impact of Mission Statements on Firm Performance. Journal of Management History (Archive). Merged into Management Decision, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 19 – 35.

BRAUN, S., WESCHE., J., FREY, D., WEISWEILER, S., PEUS, C., 2012. Effectiveness of Mission Statements in Organizations – A Review. Journal of Management&Organization, vol. 18, pp. 430 – 444.

DERMOL, V., 2012. Relationship between Mission Statement and Company Performance. Scientific Annals of the “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iasi, Economic Sciences, vol.59, no. 1, pp. 321 – 336.

HIROTA, S., KUBO, K., MIYAJIMA, H., HONG, P., PARK, Y., 2010. Corporate mission, corporate policies and business outcomes: evidence from Japan. Management Decision, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 1134-1153.

PANAYOTOVA, T., 2019. Opportunities for research the impact of intellectual capital on creating value in industrial enterprises. International Conference “Applied Computer Technologies” 19 – 21 September, Varna, Bulgaria, 2019, proceedings Computer Science and Technologies, Year XVII, no. 1, pp. 81-89. Available from: http://csejournal.cs.tu-varna.bg/ cse_journal_2019.pdf.

RAJASEKAR, J., 2013. Comparative Analysis of Mission Statement Content and Readability. Journal of Management Policy&Practice, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 131 – 147.

SUFI, T. & LYONS, H., 2003. Mission statements exposed. International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 255 – 262.

2025 година
Книжка 6
UNLOCKING THE POTENTIAL OF ESG AND AI IN HIGHER EDUCATION FINANCE: INSIGHTS FROM A STUDY ACROSS FIVE EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

Tina Vukasović, Rok Strašek, Liliya Terzieva;, Elenita Velikova, Justyna Tomala, Maria Urbaniec, Jarosław Pawlik, Michael Murg, Anita Maček

THE ROLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION FOR THE PROFESSIONAL REALIZATION OF STUDENTS – PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS

Anny Atanasova, Viktoriya Kalaydzhieva, Radostina Yuleva-Chuchulayna, Kalina Durova-Angelova

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
ТРАНСФОРМАЦИИ НА ПАЗАРА НА ТРУДА И НУЖДАТА ОТ ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИ РЕФОРМИ

Ваня Иванова, Андрей Василев, Калоян Ганев, Ралица Симеонова-Ганева

Книжка 3
FORMING ENTREPRENEURIAL CULTURE THROUGH EDUCATION

Milena Filipova, Adriana Atanasova

Книжка 2s
THE STATE OF INCLUSION IN ADAPTED BASKETBALL

Stefka Djobova, Ivelina Kirilova

Книжка 2
MODEL OF PROFESSIONALLY DIRECTED TRAINING OF FUTURE ENGINEER-TEACHERS

Ivan Beloev, Valentina Vasileva, Іnna Savytska, Oksana Bulgakova, Lesia Zbaravska, Olha Chaikovska

DETERMINANTS AFFECTING ACADEMIC STAFF SATISFACTION WITH ONLINE LEARNING IN HIGHER MEDICAL EDUCATION

Miglena Tarnovska, ;, Rumyana Stoyanova, ;, Angelina Kirkova-Bogdanova;, Rositsa Dimova

Книжка 1s
AN INNOVATIVE MODEL FOR DEVELOPING DIGITAL COMPETENCES OF SOCIAL WORKERS

Lyudmila Vekova, Tanya Vazova, Penyo Georgiev, Ekaterina Uzhikanova-Kovacheva

Книжка 1
2024 година
Книжка 6s
DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES RISK MANAGEMENT

Miglena Molhova-Vladova, Ivaylo B. Ivanov

Книжка 6
AN INTEGRATIVE APPROACH TO ORGANIZING THE FORMATION OF STUDENTS’ COGNITIVE INDEPENDENCE IN CONDITIONS OF INTENSIFICATION OF LEARNING ACTIVITIES

Albina Volkotrubova, Aidai Kasymova, Zoriana Hbur, Antonina Kichuk, Svitlana Koshova, Svitlana Khodakivska

ИНОВАТИВЕН МОДЕЛ НА ПРОЕКТНО БАЗИРАНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ НА ГИМНАЗИАЛНИ УЧИТЕЛИ: ДОБРА ПРАКТИКА ОТ УниБИТ

Жоржета Назърска, Александър Каракачанов, Магдалена Гарванова, Нина Дебрюне

Книжка 5s
КОНЦЕПТУАЛНА РАМКА ЗА ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА ИЗКУСТВЕНИЯ ИНТЕЛЕКТ ВЪВ ВИСШЕТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Акад. Христо Белоев, Валентина Войноховска, Ангел Смрикаров

ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ ПРИЛОЖИМОСТТА НА БЛОКОВИ ВЕРИГИ ОТ ПЪРВО НИВО (L1) В СИСТЕМА ЗА ЕЛЕКТРОННО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Андриан Минчев, Ваня Стойкова, Галя Шивачева, Доц Анелия Иванова

ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВА ПРИ ПРОМЯНА НА ПЛАТФОРМИ ЗА ДИСТАНЦИОННО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Антон Недялков, Милена Кирова, Мирослава Бонева

APPLICATION OF ZSPACE TECHNOLOGY IN THE DISCIPLINES OF THE STEM CYCLE

Boyana Ivanova, Kamelia Shoilekova, Desislava Atanasova, Rumen Rusev

TEACHERS' ADAPTATION TO CHANGES IN AN INCREASINGLY COMPLEX WORLD THROUGH THE USE OF AI

Zhanat Nurbekova, Kanagat Baigusheva, Kalima Tuenbaeva, Bakyt Nurbekov, Tsvetomir Vassilev

АТОСЕКУНДНОТО ОБУЧЕНИЕ – МЕТАФОРА НА ДНЕШНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Юлия Дончева, Денис Асенов, Ангел Смрикаров, Цветомир Василев

Книжка 5
Книжка 4s
Книжка 4
MANAGERIAL ASPECTS OF COOPERATION AMONG HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THEIR STAKEHOLDERS

Olha Prokopenko, Svitlana Perova, Tokhir Rakhimov, Mykola Kunytskyi, Iryna Leshchenko

Книжка 3s
Книжка 3
Книжка 2
FORMATION OF PROFESSIONAL SKILLS OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERS DURING LABORATORY PRACTICE WHEN STUDYING FUNDAMENTAL SCIENCE

Ivan Beloev, Oksana Bulgakova, Oksana Zakhutska, Maria Bondar, Lesia Zbaravska

ИМИДЖ НА УНИВЕРСИТЕТА

Галя Христозова

Книжка 1s
COMPETITIVENESS AS A RESULT OF CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION

Nikolay Krushkov, Ralitza Zayakova-Krushkova

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND SECURITY IN THE INTEGRATED CIRCUITS INDUSTRY

Ivan Nachev, Yuliana Tomova, Iskren Konstantinov, Marina Spasova

Книжка 1
PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Milena Filipova, Olha Prokopenko, Igor Matyushenko, Olena Khanova, Olga Shirobokova, Ardian Durmishi

2023 година
Книжка 6s
DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMON INFORMATION SYSTEM TO CREATE A DIGITAL CAREER CENTER TOGETHER WITH PARTNER HIGHER SCHOOLS

Yordanka Angelova, Rossen Radonov, Vasil Kuzmov, Stela Zhorzh Derelieva-Konstantinova

DRAFTING A DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION STRATEGY FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT SECTOR – EMPIRICAL STUDY ON UAE

Mounir el Khatib, Shikha al Ali, Ibrahim Alharam, Ali Alhajeri, Gabriela Peneva, Jordanka Angelova, Mahmoud Shanaa

VOYAGE OF LEARNING: CRUISE SHIPS WEATHER ROUTING AND MARITIME EDUCATION

Svetlana Dimitrakieva, Dobrin Milev, Christiana Atanasova

СТРУКТУРНИ ПРОМЕНИ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО НА МЕНИДЖЪРИ ЗА ИНДУСТРИЯ 5.0

Недко Минчев, Венета Христова, Иван Стоянов

RESEARCH OF THE INNOVATION CAPACITY OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS

Siya Veleva, ; Margarita Mondeshka, Anka Tsvetanova

Книжка 6
Книжка 5s
ВИДОВЕ ТРАВМИ В ПАРАШУТИЗМА И ПРЕВЕНЦИЯТА ИМ

Капитан III ранг Георги Калинов

Книжка 5
Книжка 4s
DETERMINING THE DEGREE OF DIGITALIZATION OF A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION

Acad. Hristo Beloev, Angel Smrikarov, Valentina Voinohovska, Galina Ivanova

ОТ STEM КЪМ BEST: ДВА СТАНДАРТА, ЕДНА ЦЕЛ

Андрей Захариев, Стефан Симеонов, Таня Тодорова

Книжка 4
EFFECT OF RESILIENCE ON BURNOUT IN ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

Radina Stoyanova, Sonya Karabeliova, Petya Pandurova, Nadezhda Zheckova, Kaloyan Mitev

Книжка 3s
INTELLIGENT ANIMAL HUSBANDRY: FARMER ATTITUDES AND A ROADMAP FOR IMPLEMENTATION

Dimitrios Petropoulos, Koutroubis Fotios, Petya Biolcheva, Evgeni Valchev

Книжка 3
STUDY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE USE OF COMMUNICATIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS OF ENGINEERS TRAINING

Ivan Beloev, Valentina Vasileva, Sergii Bilan, Maria Bondar, Oksana Bulgakova, Lyubov Shymko

Книжка 2
РАЗПОЛОЖЕНИЕ НА ВИСШИТЕ УЧИЛИЩА В БЪЛГАРИЯ В КОНТЕКСТА НА ФОРМИРАНЕ НА ПАЗАРА НА ТРУДА

Цветелина Берберова-Вълчева, Камен Петров, Николай Цонков

Книжка 1
MODERNIZATION OF THE CONTENT OF THE LECTURE COURSE IN PHYSICS FOR TRAINING FUTURE AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERS

Ivan Beloev, Valentina Vasileva, Vasyl Shynkaruk, Oksana Bulgakova, Maria Bondar, Lesia Zbaravska, Sergii Slobodian

2022 година
Книжка 6
ORGANIZATION OF AN INCLUSIVE EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT FOR THE STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS

Halyna Bilavych, Nataliia Bakhmat, Tetyana Pantiuk, Mykola Pantiuk, Borys Savchuk

ДИГИТАЛИЗАЦИЯ НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО В БЪЛГАРИЯ: СЪСТОЯНИЕ И ОБЩИ ТЕНДЕНЦИИ

Теодора Върбанова, Албена Вуцова, Николай Нетов

Книжка 5
ПРАВОТО НА ИЗБОР В ЖИВОТА НА ДЕЦАТА В РЕПУБЛИКА БЪЛГАРИЯ

Сийка Чавдарова-Костова, Даниела Рачева, Екатерина Томова, Росица Симеонова

Книжка 4
DIAGNOSIS AS A TOOL FOR MONITORING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ADDICTION PREVENTION IN ADOLESCENTS

O.A. Selivanova, N.V. Bystrova, I.I. Derecha, T.S. Mamontova, O.V. Panfilova

Книжка 3
ПУБЛИЧНОТО РАЗБИРАНЕ НА НАУКАТА В МРЕЖОВИЯ СВЯТ

Светломир Здравков, Мартин Й. Иванов, Петя Климентова

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
ДИГИТАЛНАТА ИНТЕРАКЦИЯ ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛ – СТУДЕНТ В ОНЛАЙН ОБУЧЕНИЕТО В МЕДИЦИНСКИТЕ УНИВЕРСИТЕТИ

Миглена Търновска, Румяна Стоянова, Боряна Парашкевова, Юлияна Маринова

2021 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
Книжка 4s
SIGNAL FOR HELP

Ina Vladova, Milena Kuleva

Книжка 4
PREMISES FOR A MULTICULTURAL APPROACH TO EDUCATION

Anzhelina Koriakina, Lyudmila Amanbaeva

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
ПЪРВА СЕДМИЦА ДИСТАНЦИОННО ОБУЧЕНИЕ В СУ „ИВАН ВАЗОВ“ В СТАРА ЗАГОРА

Тони Чехларова, Динко Цвятков, Неда Чехларова

Книжка 1
METHODOLOGY OF SAFETY AND QUALITY OF LIFE ON THE BASIS OF NOOSPHERIC EDUCATION SYSTEM FORMATION

Nataliia Bakhmat, Nataliia Ridei, Nataliia Tytova, Vladyslava Liubarets, Oksana Katsero

2020 година
Книжка 6
HIGHER EDUCATION AS A PUBLIC GOOD

Yulia Nedelcheva, Miroslav Nedelchev

Книжка 5
НАСЪРЧАВАНЕ НА СЪТРУДНИЧЕСТВОТО МЕЖДУ ВИСШИТЕ УЧИЛИЩА И БИЗНЕСА

Добринка Стоянова, Блага Маджурова, Гергана Димитрова, Стефан Райчев

Книжка 4
THE STRATEGY OF HUMAN RIGHTS STUDY IN EDUCATION

Anush Balian, Nataliya Seysebayeva, Natalia Efremova, Liliia Danylchenko

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
МИГРАЦИЯ И МИГРАЦИОННИ ПРОЦЕСИ

Веселина Р. Иванова

SOCIAL STATUS OF DISABLED PEOPLE IN RUSSIA

Elena G. Pankova, Tatiana V. Soloveva, Dinara A. Bistyaykina, Olga M. Lizina

Книжка 1
ETHNIC UPBRINGING AS A PART OF THE ETHNIC CULTURE

Sholpankulova Gulnar Kenesbekovna

2019 година
Книжка 6
EMOTIONAL COMPETENCE OF THE SOCIAL TEACHER

Kadisha K. Shalgynbayeva, Ulbosin Zh.Tuyakova

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
УЧИЛИЩЕТО НА БЪДЕЩЕТО

Наталия Витанова

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
POST-GRADUATE QUALIFICATION OF TEACHERS IN INTERCULTURAL EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT

Irina Koleva, Veselin Tepavicharov, Violeta Kotseva, Kremena Yordanova

ДЕЦАТА В КОНСТИТУЦИОННИТЕ НОРМИ НА БЪЛГАРИЯ

Румен Василев, Весела Марева

СЪСТОЯНИЕ НА БЪЛГАРСКОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Анелия Любенова, Любомир Любенов

ЕДИН НОВ УЧЕБНИК

Ирина Колева

2018 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
A NEW AWARD FOR PROFESSOR MAIRA KABAKOVA

Irina Koleva, Editor-in-

Книжка 4
Книжка 3
BLENDED EDUCATION IN HIGHER SCHOOLS: NEW NETWORKS AND MEDIATORS

Nikolay Tsankov, Veska Gyuviyska, Milena Levunlieva

ВЗАИМОВРЪЗКАТА МЕЖДУ СПОРТА И ПРАВОТО

Ивайло Прокопов, Елица Стоянова

ХИМЕРНИТЕ ГРУПИ В УЧИЛИЩЕ

Яна Рашева-Мерджанова

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2017 година
Книжка 6
ЗНАЧИМОСТТА НА УЧЕНЕТО: АНАЛИЗ НА ВРЪЗКИТЕ МЕЖДУ ГЛЕДНИТЕ ТОЧКИ НА УЧЕНИЦИ, РОДИТЕЛИ И УЧИТЕЛИ

Илиана Мирчева, Елена Джамбазова, Снежана Радева, Деян Велковски

Книжка 5
ОРГАНИЗАЦИОННА КУЛТУРА В УЧИЛИЩЕ

Ивайло Старибратов, Лилия Бабакова

Книжка 4
КОУЧИНГ. ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЕН КОУЧИНГ

Наталия Витанова, Нели Митева

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
ЕМПАТИЯ И РЕФЛЕКСИЯ

Нели Кънева, Кристиана Булдеева

2016 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2015 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
Книжка 4
ПРАГМАТИЧНАТА ДИДАКТИКА

Николай Колишев

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2014 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
КОХЕРЕНТНОСТ НА ПОЛИТИКИ

Албена Вуцова, Лиляна Павлова

Книжка 4
USING THE RESULTS OF A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT

Thomas Kellaghan, Vincent Greaney, T. Scott Murray

Книжка 3
USING THE RESULTS OF A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT

Thomas Kellaghan, Vincent Greaney, T. Scott Murray

Книжка 2
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF UNIVERSITY FACULTY: А SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS

Gulnar Toltaevna Balakayeva, Alken Shugaybekovich Tokmagambetov, Sapar Imangalievich Ospanov

USING THE RESULTS OF A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT

Thomas Kellaghan, Vincent Greaney, T. Scott Murray

Книжка 1
РЕФЛЕКСИЯТА В ИНТЕГРАТИВНОТО ПОЛЕ НА МЕТОДИКАТА НА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО ПО БИОЛОГИЯ

Иса Хаджиали, Наташа Цанова, Надежда Райчева, Снежана Томова

USING THE RESULTS OF A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT

Thomas Kellaghan, Vincent Greaney, T. Scott Murray

2013 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
Книжка 4
QUESTIONNAIRE DEVELOPMENT

ÎÖÅÍßÂÀÍÅÒÎ

Книжка 3
MASS MEDIA CULTURE IN KAZAKHSTAN

Aktolkyn Kulsariyeva Yerkin Massanov Indira Alibayeva

РЪКОВОДСТВО ЗА СЪСТАВЯНЕ НА ТЕСТОВЕ*

Фернандо Картрайт, Джери Мусио

РОССИЙСКАЯ СИСТЕМА ОЦЕНКИ КАЧЕСТВА ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ: ГЛАВНЫЕ УРОКИ

В. Болотов / И. Вальдман / Г. Ковалёва / М. Пинская

Книжка 2
ОЦЕНЯВАНЕ НА ГРАЖДАНСКИТЕ КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТИ НА УЧЕНИЦИТЕ: ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВА И ВЪЗМОЖНОСТИ

Светла Петрова Център за контрол и оценка на качеството на училищното образование

РЪКОВОДСТВО ЗА СЪСТАВЯНЕ НА ТЕСТОВЕ*

Фернандо Картрайт, Джери Мусио

Книжка 1
Уважаеми читатели,

вет, както и от международния борд за предоставените статии и студии, за да могат да бъдат идентифицирани в полето на образованието пред широката аудитория от педа- гогически специалисти във всички степени на образователната ни система. Благодаря за техния всеотдаен и безвъзмезден труд да създават и популяризират мрежа от научни съобщества по профила на списанието и да насърчават научните изследвания. Благодаря на рецензентите от национално представените висши училища, на- учни институции и

РЪКОВОДСТВО ЗА СЪСТАВЯНЕ НА ТЕСТОВЕ

Фернандо Картрайт, Джери Мусио

2012 година
Книжка 6
DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE IN KAZAKHSTAN IN THE PERIOD OF INDEPENDENCE

Aigerim Mynbayeva Maira Kabakova Aliya Massalimova

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
СИСТЕМАТА ЗА РАЗВИТИЕ НА АКАДЕМИЧНИЯ СЪСТАВ НА РУСЕНСКИЯ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ „АНГЕЛ КЪНЧЕВ“

Христо Белоев, Ангел Смрикаров, Орлин Петров, Анелия Иванова, Галина Иванова

Книжка 2
ПРОУЧВАНЕ НА РОДИТЕЛСКОТО УЧАСТИЕ В УЧИЛИЩНИЯ ЖИВОТ В БЪЛГАРИЯ

* Този материал е изготвен въз основа на резултатите от изследването „Parental Involvement in Life of School Matters“, проведено в България в рамките на проек- та „Advancing Educational Inclusion and Quality in South East Europe“, изпълняван

ВТОРИ ФОРУМ ЗА СТРАТЕГИИ В НАУКАТА

Тошка Борисова В края на 2011 г. в София се проведе второто издание на Форум за страте- гии в науката. Основната тема бе повишаване на международната видимост и разпознаваемост на българската наука. Форумът се организира от „Elsevier“ – водеща компания за разработване и предоставяне на научни, технически и медицински информационни продукти и услуги , с подкрепата на Министер- ството на образованието, младежта и науката. След успеха на първото издание на Форума за стратегии в науката през

Книжка 1
РЕЙТИНГИ, ИНДЕКСИ, ПАРИ

Боян Захариев