Стратегии на образователната и научната политика

2022/5, стр. 512 - 525

SELF-ASSESSMENT – A COMPONENT OF THE COMPETENCE-BASED TRAINING IN THE PROFESSION “APPLIED PROGRAMMER”

Резюме:

Ключови думи:

Introduction

The concepts of the competence approach in education have been enshrined in the legislation of the Bulgarian educational system since 2015, and since 2018 the State Educational Standard (SES)1) is a fact for the training on the new for our educational system profession “Applied Programmer” (AP). SES was established by experts from the National Agency for Vocational Education and Training (NAVET),2) specialists from the Ministry of Education and Science and representatives of the ICT sector. Specialists from the branch have formulated and submitted to the Ministry of Education and Science their Strategic Requirements to the educational system for the implementation of a competency-based approach in the field of ICT training.3) They recommend the implementation of a competency-based approach to training. The requirements are described in detail in the competency models for the various professions in the field of computer science (CS) developed by the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)4), together with recommended programs and standards for software engineering (SI) training for high school students5), as well as for bachelors6), masters7) and doctors. The strategic requirements are formulated according to the European Qualifications Framework (EQF) for key competences for lifelong learning8) and the Digital Competence Framework DigComp9). The e-CF10) framework, based on the competency models proposed by ACM, is recommended as a reference framework in the field of professional ICT skills. In 2018, the Bulgarian Chamber of Commerce (BCC) offers 12 competency models to those employed in ICT11), according to the proposed strategic requirements and the aforementioned frameworks.

It is important to note the difference between competence and competency – while the requirements for acquired knowledge and skills are focused on what needs to be known, those on competence are related to how it is done, what behavior the practitioner demonstrates, what attitude he has, how much he works independently, and to what extent he takes responsibility for dealing with the activity for which a standard of competence is set. Such an approach to training, selecting and identifying essential competencies that performers must possess is known as a competency-based approach (CBA), and teaching, learning and training aimed at developing such competencies is known as CBE.

Evaluation of learning outcomes at the CBE

The ideas of the CBA can be found in the middle of the last century – Robert White (White 1959) defines competence as the main motive for acquiring knowledge and skills. McClelland (McClelland 1973) uses the term “competence” as a successful combination of knowledge, skills, attitudes and behaviors of employees to achieve results. Boyatzis (1982) proposes a new strategy in the field of human resource management to increase the efficiency and potential of companies. L& M. Spencer (1993) developed a generic “vocabulary of competencies” for excellence.

The concepts of competency and competence have prevailed in almost the same, but often different in separate nuances meaning. According to the American school, competency is a quality, an ability inherent to the best ones, a standard to which everyone should strive. The British school uses the concept of competence as a minimum requirement, a standard that all practitioners must have.

According to the growing interpretation of the two concepts among scientists, competency should be seen as a requirement, a standard by which to compare, to which specialists should strive, while competence is an integral concept characteristic of the individual's set of abilities that meet certain requirements.

White, McCleland, Boyatsis give their definitions of the concept of competence and/or competency. For the purposes of this article we will use the definition of the European Commission (EC):

Competence – a set of knowledge, skills, attitudes and behaviors of employees needed to achieve certain results.

Competence is most often associated with the ability to understand something that can be done, ie. knowledge-based skills. Competences are abilities, but not innate, but “those that are developed through quality learning, in an appropriate pedagogical environment and through the acquisition of serious practical experience” (Zwell 2000). Knowledge is a valuable resource that is acquired with a lot of effort, self-control and work aimed at self-improvement of the individual. The earlier the age of children working in this direction, the higher the level of competence over time. The knowledge and skills acquired by the students reflect on the degree of competence in each activity by interests and activities.

The CBE paradigm has its roots in the constructivist theory of pedagogy, whose first representatives are considered to be Lev Vigotskiy (2005) and Jean Piaget (1969).12) According to the constructivist theory, it is based on the understanding of the activity of the knowing subject (Kasavin 2009; Lebedev 2004; Mikeshina 2005). Georgieva (2014) highlights the weaknesses of traditional learning: “Many researchers, teachers and students admit that the traditional approaches to 'Teaching as a transfer of knowledge' have serious shortcomings.” In it, students are often unable to apply what they have learned in real life outside school (Boaler 1998; Von Glasersfeld 1984) or simply forget what they have learnt by heart over time (Von Glasersfeld 1984). Boaler (1998) shares the conclusions of mathematics teachers that students are unable to use the methods and rules learned in traditional schools due to their lack of understanding. There is a need to transform traditional learning to one in which the learner is at the center of learning and develop the learner's ability to solve practical problems individually or in a team. Learning that is 'active', aimed at enhancing students' cognitive activity throughout the learning process (Gyurova 2006).

At the center of the CBE is the student. The aim is to achieve results described as expected behaviors in the successful implementation of the learning activity, the formation of competencies, rather than teaching certain learning materials.

In creating curricula, the constructivist principle is decisive – the student to be a researcher and to participate in the evaluation of their own achievements, discovering and overcoming gaps. The teacher is to diagnose difficulties and gaps in a timely manner and to adapt the learning content, personalizing it for the needs of the learner. Assessment does not aim at quantifying, but serves to correct pedagogical interaction to improve learning outcomes. Suitable for this purpose is the so-called. ADDIE (Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, Evaluate) model13) for curriculum development and follow-up training. The main phases are: Needs analysis – students communicate their interests, and the teacher gets acquainted with the level of students by making an initial diagnosis of the level of knowledge, skills and competencies that he aims to develop in them. The design includes Planning (design) Analyze of appropriate learning content and teaching methodology. Development involves the creation of lesson units. Implementation implementation of training. Evaluate – evaluation of learning outcomes of training.

In the CBE, assessment is formative (FD)14), also known by the term “education assessment” and summarizing (summative). The combination of which leads to better results (Dante 2016; Connors 2021). FD is aimed at feedback at each stage, which aims to determine how much new knowledge has been mastered and what difficulties are encountered.

According to (Grangeat 2021) such professional moves are complex because implementing formative and summative assessments in a complementary manner remains a challenge for teachers and researchers.

In the subsequent analysis in the cycle, if necessary, personalization of the teaching is made in order to achieve the target ROs. Given that this assessment takes place during the learning process and is used to support learning, it is also known as 'ongoing assessment'. This can be done by a teacher or other learner who checks and reports the results of the students' work, without having to make an assessment. The purpose of the ongoing assessment is to direct the learner and the teacher to the problematic part of the learning process in which the learner has difficulty in mastering it, and not in making assessments. Students define their own work and are encouraged to ask questions about the material they are studying. In the current assessment of the modules related to programming, it is appropriate to use automated assessment systems (Judge systems), (Wasik 2016, 2018; Yadav 2017).

In the evaluation of tasks related to writing program code, evaluation systems are a kind of tool for automated code testing. Given the various possible strategies for action, the developed such a way assessment systems offer a number of didactic opportunities to facilitate the learning and self-preparation of learners. The evaluation systems can be adapted to support automatically, with varying degrees of assistance, guidance in cases where programs are not working properly. Such systems allow the learner to receive timely feedback on their progress.

The tools for checking the achieved learning outcomes include: tests, practical tasks, self-assessments, expert assessments, 360° assessments. The latter is a mutual evaluation between learners15).

For the purposes of the study we will focus in more detail on the tool “Selfassessment”.

Self-esteem is the judgment we give ourselves. It is an assessment of one's own qualities, skills and way of doing the job. Self-assessment is related to identifying our strengths and weaknesses and guidelines for further training and professional development. The ability to self-assess is a skill of a high order and it must be developed and improved. According to Staribratov, self-assessment is not an isolated method unknown to the teacher, but the idea is not to use it sporadically, but to be a system that is purposefully used throughout the year, throughout the training period. For which the teacher must build a strategy and actively involve students in its implementation (Staribratov 2021). A very large part of high school students use self-assessment as a building block for acquiring new knowledge. The teacher is the engine and motivating factor for their commitment, and this leads to high results and a sense of satisfaction with the work done.

Self-esteem can also be complete, generalized, also called holistic, authentic. Such self-assessment is an assessment obtained as a result of all self-assessments on individual topics and sub-topics that one gives for themselves. Such self-assessment concerns the extent to which a person is considered significant on the basis of standards that he or she considers authentic. Such self-esteem is psychological in nature and is not the goal of specific research, despite its importance to the individual.

The CBE works especially successfully and effectively to build a positive selfesteem, where mistakes are seen as a natural stage of the learning process. "Pointing out failures and mistakes is measured, respectful and related to opportunities and prospects. Incentive-based training is supported. In this way, students develop a sense of significance, confidence and satisfaction. (Brankova 2021). The application of innovative methods of teaching and assessment is a key factor for increasing knowledge and skills, for developing and expanding the competencies of students.

Self-assessment (Staribratov 2021) is a way of assessing, diagnosing and reflecting on one's own knowledge, a method that modern students do not master at a good enough level.

Given the proposed definitions and clarifications in the sense of the term "selfassessment", we present you the study.

Purpose of the study

To check whether the methodological approach used for CBE has a positive effect on the results of students' self-assessment.

Materials and tools for the study

For the purpose of the research, a questionnaire was created with questions selected on the basis of the expected learning outcomes set out in the SES for AP, as well as the expected skills for writing quality program code described in the competency models and profiles. Each competence (competence according to the SES terminology for AP) is described by behavioral indicators – suitable for the activity verbs from Bloom's taxonomy, which the learner performs during his work.

Other dimensions of competence include: Degree of responsibility, degree of independence, compliance with a quality standard, compliance with a safety standard.

Course of the researc

The students are divided into 2 groups:

– Experimental group (EG) – 53 students trained at the centers of Plovdiv and Burgas by NPITC, for whom a methodological approach for CBТ has been applied, – Control Group (CG) – 116 students from the regular form of education, in which traditional education in the same schools was used.

After training in half of the AP modules, a survey was conducted in both groups for self-assessment of the results of students' learning with the help of the Google Forms tool. The questions explore key and specific competencies related to Algorithms and Data Structures, Functional and Object Oriented Programming, skills for writing quality program code. For each question, students indicate the degree of mastery of the specific competence in 5 possible levels – from the lowest first level – 1, to the highest fifth level – 5. Each of the levels is described in advance what it means, through relevant indicators of mastery and behavior which students demonstrate in solving problems related to competence. Each level after the first includes as mastered competencies the previous levels shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1

Research results

The processing of the results goes through several steps. After data collection, a summary of the results was made and their frequency distributions were compiled.

For each level, the absolute frequency was calculated, showing the number of responses for a given level, as well as its percentage, by its reference frequency. The calculated cumulative frequency shows how much of the students cover this and the lower levels, given the principle of including the lower levels. The results are presented in Table 1,2,3:

Table 1. Key and Professional Competencies

Frequency EGFrequency CGLevelAbsolutReferenceCumulativeLevelAbsolutReferenceCumulative11306,0%6,0%158516,3%16,3%228513,2%19,2%2122734,2%50,6%348322,4%41,6%355915,6%66,2%465930,5%72,0%485223,8%89,9%560428,0%100,0%536110,1%100,0%Total2161100,0%3584100,0%

Table 2. Professional competencies

Frequency EGFrequency CGLevelAbsolutReferenceCumulativeLevelAbsolutReferenceCumulative11225,7%5,7%151514,2%14,2%228513,2%18,9%2110430,4%44,5%348322,4%41,3%3101427,9%72,4%465930,6%71,9%458516,1%88,5%560428,1%100,0%541911,5%100,0%Total2153100,0%3637100,0%

Table 3. Key competencies

Frequency EGFrequency CGLevelAbsolutReferenceCumulativeLevelAbsolutReferenceCumulative180,4%0,4%1194,1%4,1%228514,0%14,4%25712,2%16,2%348323,7%38,1%310021,3%37,5%465932,3%70,4%413428,6%66,1%560429,6%100,0%515933,9%100,0%Total2039100,0%469100,0%The results are presented graphically on Diagram 1,2,3:

Diagram 1

Diagram 2

Diagram 3

Of interest is the test of the hypothesis whether the students of the new methodology have a higher self-esteem at a significance level of 0.05.

As the two samples are derived from different general populations, there is a case of two independent samples with different variances of the general populations. The following hypotheses are formulated for solving the problem:

.

To find the test statistics and their critical values at a predetermined level of significance, we will apply t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances. The results are presented in Table 4, 5, 6:

Table 4. Professional comptencies

Table 5. Key Competencies

Table 6. Professional and Key Competencies

All three test statistics 4.78; 3.73 and 4.82222 exceed the critical value for the one-sided test 1.75, therefore the null hypothesis is rejected. This means that it can be assumed that there is a statistically significant difference between the level of self-esteem of students in the two groups at a significance level of 0.05.

Average values for the key competencies

QestionsEGCG1. When working in a project team, I take the initiative in planning,justifying the individual steps for project implementation and takeresponsibility for the implementation of planned activities.3,6803553,5833332. I show a critical attitude and responsibility in the application ofthe studied technologies.2,8002223,5833333. I am convinced that the knowledge and skills I acquire will helpme to show responsible behavior and participation in public life.4,1402153,24. I perform the tasks assigned to me on my own, even underslightly changing conditions, and I am responsible for that.4,1198673,4666675. I can objectively assess the quality of the personal or teamtask performed.4,1387353,756. I can decide on my education and future career developmentbased on self-assessment of my competencies / qualications4,1815383,9833337. I orient myself in the opportunities for continuing my educationand training4,3000374,0333338. I use a variety of ways to expand and update my professionalqualications.4,0588242,99. I work constructively and in diverse groups / teams4,2205883,466667

Discussion

With regard to key competences, there is an interesting result of Question 2. Which is an exception to the overall trend. Further study of the data obtained can be done to find an explanation for the better result in the control group. In addition, the other type of assessment will be conducted with the trained students – Expert assessment, which will provide more data for analysis of the cause.

With regard to the CBE, we can say that it requires additional preliminary work, few teachers are ready to implement it, but the results are encouraging.

Conclusion

The CBE is a successful form of education that is increasingly used to improve the training of the modern knowledge-based economy. At the center of the CBE is the learner. ADDIE – the training model meets the objectives of the CBE.

A key component of the CBE is the feedback that trainers and trainees exchange with one another. Students' self-assessment is a complex of: information about their own achievements, attitude to the value of personal and professional abilities, as well as most importantly - psychological self-perception of one's own personality and its significance. In the context of the CBE, the process of building a true selfassessment of personal and professional competencies is a key factor for both successful education at school and the subsequent realization at the labor market. Building such reflective ability in learners should be a priority of education. Authentic self-assessment can most successfully indicate and “suggest” where the gaps are and what difficulties the person is facing. It is this autonomous element in the personality, without which it is impossible to fully integrate it into social and public life, which in turn is the meaning of education.

From the presented results of the research it follows that the CBE leads to better results in learners in self-assessment of key and professional competencies. It is necessary to conclude that the CBE is suitable for use in modern education, despite the need for serious preparation before its implementation.

Acknowledgements

The work on the article is partially supported by the MU21-FMI-011 project of the Fund “Scientific research” at the University of Plovdiv “Paisii Hilendarski”.

NOTES

1. NES PAP https://www.mon.bg/upload/14210/dos_481030.pdf [Last visited: 13.04.2022].

2. NAPOO https://www.navet.government.bg/bg/sashtnost-na-spisaka-naprofesiite-za-pr/ [Last visited: 13.04.2022].

3. Strategicheski iziskvania na softuernata industria za reforma na obrazovatelnata sistema https://basscom.org/RapidASPEditor/MyUploadDocs/SoftwareIndustry-Requirements-for-Educational-Ref.pdf [Last visited: 13.04.2022].

4. ACM https://www.acm.org/ [Last visited: 13.04.2022].

5. CSTA K-12 https://www.doe.k12.de.us/cms/lib/DE01922744/Centricity/ Domain/176/CSTA%20Computer%20Science%20Standards%20Revised%20 2017.pdf [Last visited: 13.04.2022]

6. Software Engineering 2014 Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Software Engineering https://www.acm.org/binaries/content/ assets/education/se2014.pdf [Last visited: 13.04.2022].

7. Graduate Software Engineering 2009(GSwE2009) Curriculum Guidelines for Graduate Degree Programs in Software Engineering https://www.acm.org/ binaries/content/assets/education/gsew2009.pdf [Last visited: 13.04.2022].

8. European-qualifications-framework https://europa.eu/europass/bg/europeanqualifications-framework-eqf [Last visited: 13.04.2022].

9. The digital competence framework for citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use https://op.europa.eu/bg/publication-detail/-/ publication/3c5e7879-308f-11e7-9412-01aa75ed71a1 [Last visited: 13.04.2022].

10. e-CF https://itprofessionalism.org/about-it-professionalism/competences/thee-competence-framework/ [Last visited: 13.04.2022].

11. Sektoren model s vklyucheni 12 klyuchovi dlazhnosti https://www.basscom.org/ RapidASPEditor/MyUploadDocs/SCM_IT12_final.pdf [Last visited: 13.04.2022].

12. Konstruktivizmat kato teoria za prepodavane i uchene https://bg.larafornm. com/constructivism-128 [Last visited: 13.04.2022].

13. ADDIE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADDIE_Model [Last visited: 13.04.2022].

14. Formative and Summative assesment https://web.archive.org/ web/20090312035549/http://www.ukcle.ac.uk/resources/assessment/formative. html [Last visited: 13.04.2022].

15. MyCompetence https://mycompetence.bg/bg/static/10 [Last visited: 13.04.2022].

REFERENCES

BOALER, J. 1998. Open and Closed Mathematics: Student Experiences and Understandings. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 41 – 62. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/749717

BOYATZIS, R., 1982. The Competent Manager: A Model for Eective Performance. NY: John Wiley & Sons.

BRANKOVA, Z., 2021. Aktivnoto uchene kato sredstvo za razvivane na klyuchovi kompetentnosti. Prodalzhavashto obrazovanie TOM 16/2021 Available at: https://diuu.bg/emag/9052/.

CONNORS, C. B., 2021. Summative and Formative Assessments: An Educational Polarity. Kappa Delta Pi Record. 57(2), 70 – 74. DOI: 10.1080/00228958.2021.1890441.

DANTE D., WORRELL, F., 2016. Formative and Summative Assessment in the Classroom. Theory Into Practice. 55(2), 153 – 159, DOI: 10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989

GEORGIEVA, D., 2014, Rolyata na konstruktivizma v obuchenieto po matematika. Nauchni trudove na rusenskia universitet 2014, 53, seria 6.2., 173 – 179, ISSN 1311-3321. (In Bulgarian).

GRANGEAT M., HARRISON, C., DOLIN, J. 2021. Exploring assessment in STEM inquiry learning classrooms, International Journal of Science Education, 43(3), 345 – 361. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2021.1903617

GYUROVA, V.; DERMENDZHIEVA, G.; VARBANOVA S. & BOZHILOVA, V., 2006. Priklyuchenieto ucheben protses. Sofia: Agentsia Evropres. (In Bulgarian).

KASAVIN, I., 2009. Entsiklopedia epistemologii i filosofii nauki. Available at: http://epistemology_of_science.academic.ru/

LEBEDEV, S., 2004. Filosofia nauki: Slovary osnovnыh terminov. Moskow: Akademicheskiy Proekt. Available at: http://terme.ru/dictionary/905/ word/konstruktivizm-filosofskii.

MCCLELLAND, D., 1973. Testing for competence rather than for intelligence. American Psychologist.28(4), 1 – 14. [viewed 15 April 2022]. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0034092.

MIKESHINA, L., 2005. Filosofia nauki. Sovremennaya эpistemologia. Nauchnoe znanie dinamike kulyturы. Metodologia nauchnogo issledovania. Uchebnoe posobie. Moskva: Progress-Traditsia; Moskovskiy psihologo-sotsialynыy institut Izdatelystvo “Flinta”.

PIAGET, J., 1969. Psychologie et pdagogie. La rponse du grand psychologue aux problŽmes de l'enseignement. – Paris, Denol, 1969. – 20 cm, 264 p. (Mdiations).

SPENCER, L., SPENCER, S., 1993. Competence atWork: Models for Superior Performance. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

STARIBRATOV, I., 2021. Samootsenyavaneto – element ot kompetetnostnia model na obuchenie. Pedagogika na obuchenieto po matematika i informatika 6, sbornik dokladi. ISBN 2534-8795.

Vigotski, L., 2005. Izbrani psihologicheski proizvedenia, Sofia: PSIDO EOOD.

VON GLASERSFELD, E., 1984. An introduction to radical constructivism. In:

PAUL WATZLAWIK (Ed.). The Invented Reality. (pp. 1 – 29). Norton, New York (Reprinted from Die Erfindung der Wirklichkeit. Piper, Munich, 1981).

ZWELL, M., 2000. Creating a Competence. New York, Published by John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, ISBN 10: 0471350745 / ISBN 13: 9780471350743

2025 година
Книжка 4
ТРАНСФОРМАЦИИ НА ПАЗАРА НА ТРУДА И НУЖДАТА ОТ ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИ РЕФОРМИ

Ваня Иванова, Андрей Василев, Калоян Ганев, Ралица Симеонова-Ганева

Книжка 3
FORMING ENTREPRENEURIAL CULTURE THROUGH EDUCATION

Prof. Dr. Milena Filipova, Adriana Atanasova, PhD student

Книжка 2s
THE STATE OF INCLUSION IN ADAPTED BASKETBALL

Dr. Stefka Djobova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Ivelina Kirilova, Assist. Prof.

THE IMPACT OF AGE ON ADULT’S PARTICIPATION IN PHYSICAL ACTIVITIES DURING LEISURE TIME

Dr. Despina Sivevska, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Biljana Popeska, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 2
MODEL OF PROFESSIONALLY DIRECTED TRAINING OF FUTURE ENGINEER-TEACHERS

Prof. Ivan Beloev, Dr. Valentina Vasileva, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Іnna Savytska, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Oksana Bulgakova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lesia Zbaravska, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Olha Chaikovska, Assoc. Prof.

QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN BULGARIA: COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY TRAINING

Prof. Rositsa Doneva, Dr. Silvia Gaftandzhieva, Assoc. Prof.

ВЛИЯНИЕ НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО И ЧОВЕШКИЯ КАПИТАЛ ВЪРХУ ФОРМАЛНАТА И НЕФОРМАЛНАТА ИКОНОМИКА

Проф. д-р Стефан Петранов, доц. д-р Стела Ралева, доц. д-р Димитър Златинов

DETERMINANTS AFFECTING ACADEMIC STAFF SATISFACTION WITH ONLINE LEARNING IN HIGHER MEDICAL EDUCATION

Dr. Miglena Tarnovska, Assoc.Prof.; Dr. Rumyana Stoyanova, Assoc.Prof.; Dr. Angelina Kirkova-Bogdanova; Prof. Rositsa Dimova

Книжка 1s
CHALLENGES FACED BY THE BULGARIAN UNIVERSITIES IN THE CONTEXT OF SCIENCE – INDUSTRY RELATIONS

Dr. Svetla Boneva, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Nikolay Krushkov, Assoc. Prof.

INVENTING THE FUTURE: CAN BULGARIAN UNIVERSITIES FULFILL THEIR MISSION AS CATALYSTS FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH AND SUSTAINABILITY?

Dr. Ralitsa Zayakova-Krushkova, Assist. Prof., Dr. Alexander Mitov, Assoc. Prof.

AN INNOVATIVE MODEL FOR DEVELOPING DIGITAL COMPETENCES OF SOCIAL WORKERS

Prof Dr. Lyudmila Vekova, Dr. Tanya Vazova, Chief Assist. Prof., Dr. Penyo Georgiev, Chief Assist. Prof., Dr. Ekaterina Uzhikanova-Kovacheva

BUSINESS ASPECTS OF ACADEMIC PUBLISHING

Dr. Polina Stoyanova, Chief Assist. Prof.

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF MUSIC STREAMING

Dr. Dimiter Gantchev, Assist. Prof.

FILM INCENTIVE SCHEME IN THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA

Dr. Ivan Nachev, Assist. Prof.

PATENT PROTECTION OF DIGITAL TWINS

Dr. Vladislava Pаcheva, Chief Assist. Prof.

Книжка 1

МНОГОСТРАНЕН ПОДХОД ЗА ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ РАВНИЩЕТО НА ДИГИТАЛИЗАЦИЯ В ПОДГОТОВКАТА НА БЪДЕЩИ УЧИТЕЛИ

Доц. д-р Бистра Мизова, проф. д-р Румяна Пейчева-Форсайт Проф. д-р Харви Мелър

2024 година
Книжка 6s
DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES RISK MANAGEMENT

Dr. Miglena Molhova-Vladova, Dr. Ivaylo B. Ivanov

THE DUAL IMPACT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: CATALYST FOR INNOVATION OR THREAT TO STABILITY

Prof. Diana Antonova, Dr. Silvia Beloeva, Assist. Prof., Ana Todorova, PhD student

MARKETING IN TOURISM: PRACTICAL EVIDENCES

Dr. Fahri Idriz, Assoc. Prof.

DEVELOPMENT OF THE INFORMATION ECONOMY CONCEPT AND THE TRANSITION TO INDUSTRY 5.0

Dr. Dora Doncheva, Assist. Prof., Dr. Dimitrina Stoyancheva, Assoc. Prof.

THE GLOBAL MARKET AS A PROJECTION OF THE INFORMATION ECONOMY

Dr. Vanya Hadzhieva, Assist. Prof. Dr. Dora Doncheva, Assist. Prof.

ACADEMIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP: PRACTICAL RESULTS AND TRAINING

Prof. Nikolay Sterev, DSc., Dr. Daniel Yordanov, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 6
AN INTEGRATIVE APPROACH TO ORGANIZING THE FORMATION OF STUDENTS’ COGNITIVE INDEPENDENCE IN CONDITIONS OF INTENSIFICATION OF LEARNING ACTIVITIES

Dr. Albina Volkotrubova, Assoc. Prof. Aidai Kasymova Prof. Zoriana Hbur, DSc. Assoc. Prof. Antonina Kichuk, DSc. Dr. Svitlana Koshova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Svitlana Khodakivska, Assoc. Prof.

ИНОВАТИВЕН МОДЕЛ НА ПРОЕКТНО БАЗИРАНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ НА ГИМНАЗИАЛНИ УЧИТЕЛИ: ДОБРА ПРАКТИКА ОТ УниБИТ

Проф. д-р Жоржета Назърска, доц. д-р Александър Каракачанов, проф. д-р Магдалена Гарванова, доц. д-р Нина Дебрюне

Книжка 5s
КОНЦЕПТУАЛНА РАМКА ЗА ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА ИЗКУСТВЕНИЯ ИНТЕЛЕКТ ВЪВ ВИСШЕТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Акад. д.н. Христо Белоев, проф. д.н. Валентина Войноховска, проф. д-р Ангел Смрикаров

ИЗКУСТВЕНИЯТ ИНТЕЛЕКТ В БИЗНЕСА – ФИНАНСОВИ, ИКОНОМИЧЕСКИ И МАРКЕТИНГОВИ АСПЕКТИ

Проф. д-р Андрей Захариев, доц. д-р Драгомир Илиев Гл. ас. д-р Даниела Илиева

RECENT TRENDS AND APPLICATIONS OF THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE EDUCATION

Prof. Dr. Plamen Zahariev, Prof. Dr. Georgi Hristov, Prof. Dr. Ivan Beloev

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF UTILIZING POPULAR INTELLIGENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS IN EDUCATION

Dr. Galina Ivanova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Aleksandar Ivanov, Assoc. Prof.

CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF TRAINING IN REMOTE VIRTUAL SUPERVISION IN SOCIAL WORK

Dr. Silviya Beloeva, Assist. Prof. Dr. Nataliya Venelinova, Assist. Prof.

ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ ПРИЛОЖИМОСТТА НА БЛОКОВИ ВЕРИГИ ОТ ПЪРВО НИВО (L1) В СИСТЕМА ЗА ЕЛЕКТРОННО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Андриан Минчев, проф. Ваня Стойкова, гл. ас. д-р Галя Шивачева Доц д-р Анелия Иванова

DIGITAL DISCRIMINATION RISKS IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION

Dr. Silviya Beloeva, Assist. Prof. Dr. Nataliya Venelinova, Assist. Prof.

OPPORTUNITIES, CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS FOR DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESSES THROUGH 3D TECHNOLOGIES

Prof. Georgi Hristov, Prof. Plamen Zahariev, Dr. Diyana Kinaneva, Assist. Prof., Georgi Georgiev, Assist. Prof.

ДИГИТАЛНОТО ПОКОЛЕНИЕ VS. СЛЯТОТО, ПОЛУСЛЯТОТО И РАЗДЕЛНОТО ПИСАНЕ

Доц. д-р Владислав Маринов, ас. Анита Тодоранова

OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES FOR THE EDUCATION OF STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS IN THE DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT: THE NEW NORMAL

Prof. Julia Doncheva, DSc., Dr. Galina Ivanova, Assoc. Prof. Dilshod Tojievich Oblokulov

ИЗГРАЖДАНЕ НА КОМПЕТЕНЦИИ ЗА РАЗРАБОТВАНЕ НА STEM ОБУЧИТЕЛНИ РЕСУРСИ У БЪДЕЩИ УЧИТЕЛИ ПО ПРИРОДНИ НАУКИ

Доц. д-р Евгения Горанова, проф. д.н. Валентина Войноховска, проф. д-р Ангел Смрикаров

APPLICATION OF ZSPACE TECHNOLOGY IN THE DISCIPLINES OF THE STEM CYCLE

Boyana Ivanova, Assist. Prof. Dr. Kamelia Shoilekova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Desislava Atanasova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Rumen Rusev, Assoc. Prof.

TEACHERS' ADAPTATION TO CHANGES IN AN INCREASINGLY COMPLEX WORLD THROUGH THE USE OF AI

Prof. Zhanat Nurbekova, Kanagat Baigusheva, Kalima Tuenbaeva, Bakyt Nurbekov Prof. Tsvetomir Vassilev

АТОСЕКУНДНОТО ОБУЧЕНИЕ – МЕТАФОРА НА ДНЕШНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Проф. д.н. Юлия Дончева, Денис Асенов, проф. д-р Ангел Смрикаров проф. д-р Цветомир Василев

APPLICATION AND ASSESSMENT OF DIGITAL RESOURCES IN THE EDUCATION OF FUTURE PEDAGOGUES

Dr. Galina Ivanova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Milena Velikova, Assist. Prof.

IDENTIFYING PLAYER TYPES IN THE CLASSROOM FOR EFFECTIVE GAMIFICATION

Dr. Desislava Atanasova, Assoc. Prof., Viliana Molnar

DEVELOPMENT AND INTEGRATION OF AUDIO AND VISUAL MICRO-RESOURCES IN THE LEARNING PROCESS THROUGH THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS

Dr. Petya Stefanova, Assist. Prof., Dr. Assist. Elitsa Ibryamova, Assist. Prof., Prof. Angel Smrikarov, Dr. Galina Ivanova, Assoc. Prof.

АНАЛИЗ НА ПРОГРАМНИТЕ МОДЕЛИ ЗА АВТОМАТИЗИРАНЕ НА КОГНИТИВНИ ПРОЦЕСИ

Доц. д-р Валентин Атанасов Доц. д-р Анелия Иванова

Книжка 5
MANAGING A POSITIVE AND LIFE-SKILLS DEVELOPMENT IN THE SCHOOL-BASED CURRICULA: A LITERATURE REVIEW ON THE SUSTAINABLE EDUCATION

Dr. Lindita Durmishi, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Ardian Durmishi Prof. Milena Filipova Dr. Silva Ibrahimi

APPLICATION OF THE COMPETENCY MODEL IN BUSINESS ADMINISTARATION HIGHER EDUCATION IN HORIZON 2030

Prof. Nadya Mironova, Dr. Tatyana Kicheva, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Miglena Angelova, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 4s
THE EDUCATION AND RESEARCH IN THE QUADRUPLE HELIX AND THE REGIONAL INNOVATION PROSPECTS

Prof. Dr. Milen Baltov Dr. Stela Baltova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Vilyana Ruseva, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 4
ATTITUDES OF STUDENTS – FUTURE TEACHERS, FOR THE APPLICATION OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Assoc. Prof. Nikolay Tsankov, DSc. Dr. Ivo Damyanov, Assist. Prof.

EDUCATIONAL NEEDS OF THE JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITALIZATION

Dr. Diana Dimitrova, Dr. Darina Dimitrova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Velina Koleva

MANAGERIAL ASPECTS OF COOPERATION AMONG HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THEIR STAKEHOLDERS

Prof. Olha Prokopenko, DSc. Dr. Svitlana Perova, Assoc. Prof. Prof. Tokhir Rakhimov, DSc.

APPLICATION OF EDUCATIONAL STRATEGIES IN STUDYING THE DYNAMICS OF STATE POWER STRUCTURES: IMPLEMENTATION OF FORMAL AND INFORMAL MECHANISMS OF INFLUENCE

Prof. Stoyan Denchev, DSc. Dr. Miriyana Pavlova, Assist. Prof. Dr. Steliana Yordanova, Assist. Prof.

ДИАГНОСТИКА НА ФОРМИРАНАТА ПРОФЕСИОНАЛНА КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТ НА БЪДЕЩИ ИНЖЕНЕРИ ПО ЕНЕРГЕТИКА

Гл. ас. д-р Надя Илиева Доц. д-р Елена Бояджиева Ивалина Маринова

Книжка 3s
A MODEL FOR CALCULATING THE INDIRECT ADDED VALUE OF AI FOR BUSINESS

Dr. Petya Biolcheva, Assoc. Prof., Prof. Nikolay Sterev, DSc.

AI EFFECTIVENESS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF INVESTMENTS IN HIGH-RISK START-UPS

Sotir Ivanov, PhD Student, Dr. Petya Biolcheva, Assoc. Prof.

COMPETITIVENESS OF TEXTILE PRODUCERS IN DIGITAL BUSINESS ERA

Prof. Nikolay Sterev, DSc., Dr. Vyara Milusheva, Assoc. Prof.

CHALLANGES OF USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MANAGEMENT DECISION MAKING

Dr. Bozhana Stoycheva, Assist. Prof. Dr. Pavel Vitliemov, Assoc. Prof.

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ERASMUS+ MOBILITY IN BUSINESS EDUCATION: AN EXAMINATION OF A SUCCESSFUL BULGARIAN-MEXICAN COLLABORATION

Dr. Lyudmila Mihaylova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Emil Papazov, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Diana E. Woolfolk Ruiz

Книжка 3
ИГРОВИ ПОДХОДИ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО: УНИВЕРСИТЕТСКИ КОНТЕКСТ

Проф. д.н. Цветан Давидков Силвия Тонева, докторант

Книжка 2
FORMATION OF PROFESSIONAL SKILLS OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERS DURING LABORATORY PRACTICE WHEN STUDYING FUNDAMENTAL SCIENCE

Dr. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Oksana Bulgakova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Oksana Zakhutska, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Maria Bondar, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lesia Zbaravska, Assoc. Prof.

ИМИДЖ НА УНИВЕРСИТЕТА

Проф. д.п.н. Галя Христозова

Книжка 1s
COMPETITIVENESS AS A RESULT OF CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION

Dr. Nikolay Krushkov, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ralitza Zayakova-Krushkova

INNOVATION, TECHNICAL PROGRESS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Dr. Aleksandar Aleksandrov, Assist. Prof.

ENHANCING ECONOMIC SECURITY THROUGH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Dr. Dimiter Gantchev, Assist. Prof.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND SECURITY IN THE INTEGRATED CIRCUITS INDUSTRY

Dr. Ivan Nachev, Dr. Yuliana Tomova, Iskren Konstantinov, PhD student, Marina Spasova, student

GREEN TRADEMARKS AND SUSTAINABILITY

Dr. Silviya Todorova, Assist. Prof.

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ITS PROTECTION AS AN INVENTION

Dr. Vladislava Pаcheva, Assist. Prof.

Книжка 1
PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Prof. Dr. Milena Filipova Prof. Dr. Olha Prokopenko Prof. Dr. Igor Matyushenko, Dr. Olena Khanova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Olga Shirobokova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ardian Durmishi

RESEARCH OF USING THE SYSTEM APPROACH TO INCREASE PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE OF STUDENTS IN THE PROCESS OF STUDYING NATURAL SCIENCES

Dr. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Іnna Savytska, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Oksana Bulgakova, Assoc. Prof. Prof. Iryna Yasinetska, Dr. Lesia Zbaravska, Assoc. Prof.

2023 година
Книжка 6s
TRANSFORMING MARITIME EDUCATION FOR A DIGITAL INDUSTRY

Dr. Christiana Atanasova, Assist. Prof.

DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMON INFORMATION SYSTEM TO CREATE A DIGITAL CAREER CENTER TOGETHER WITH PARTNER HIGHER SCHOOLS

Prof. Dr. Yordanka Angelova, Dr. Rossen Radonov, Assoc. Prof. Vasil Kuzmov, Assist. Prof. Stela Zhorzh Derelieva-Konstantinova

DRAFTING A DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION STRATEGY FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT SECTOR – EMPIRICAL STUDY ON UAE

Mounir el Khatib, Shikha al Ali, Ibrahim Alharam, Ali Alhajeri Dr. Gabriela Peneva, Assist. Prof., Prof. Jordanka Angelova, Mahmoud Shanaa

VOYAGE OF LEARNING: CRUISE SHIPS WEATHER ROUTING AND MARITIME EDUCATION

Prof. Svetlana Dimitrakieva, Dr. Dobrin Milev, Assist. Prof., Dr. Christiana Atanasova, Assist. Prof.

RESEARCH ON THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT COMPETENCES OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN PRACTICE

Land. arch. Elena Dragozova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Stanislava Kovacheva, Assoc. Prof.

STUDY OF THE KEY FACTORS INFLUENCING THE EFFECTIVE PLANNING AND UTILIZATION OF PRODUCTION FACILITIES IN THE INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISE

Dr. Tanya Panayotova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Krasimira Dimitrova, Assoc. Prof., Neli Veleva, PhD student

SIMULATOR TRAINING – UNIQUE POWERFUL INSTRUMENT FOR EDUCATING, SKILLS CREATING, MITIGATING SKILLS AND RESILIENCE CREATING

Prof. Dimitar Dimitrakiev, Vencislav Stankov, Assist. Prof., Dr. Christiana Atanasova, Assist. Prof.

СТРУКТУРНИ ПРОМЕНИ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО НА МЕНИДЖЪРИ ЗА ИНДУСТРИЯ 5.0

Доц. д-р Недко Минчев, доц. д-р Венета Христова, гл. ас. д-р Иван Стоянов

RESEARCH OF THE INNOVATION CAPACITY OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS

Dr. Siya Veleva, Assoc. Prof.; Prof. Dr. Eng. Margarita Mondeshka Dr. Anka Tsvetanova, Assoc. Prof.,

Книжка 6
Книжка 5s
ПРЕСЕЧНАТА ТОЧКА НА СПОРТА, СИГУРНОСТТА И КРИПТО ФЕН ТОКЕНИТЕ

Полк. доц. Георги Маринов Доц. Милена Кулева

ВИДОВЕ ТРАВМИ В ПАРАШУТИЗМА И ПРЕВЕНЦИЯТА ИМ

Капитан III ранг Георги Калинов

ОБУЧЕНИЕ В ХОДЕНЕ С ПОМОЩНИ СРЕДСТВА – РИСКОВЕ И СИГУРНОСТ ЗА ПАЦИЕНТА

Атанас Друмев Доц. д-р Данелина Вачева, доц. д-р Искра Петкова

Книжка 5
ПОДХОДИ ЗА ПСИХОСОЦИАЛНА ПОДКРЕПА НА УНИВЕРСИТЕТСКИ ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛИ В УСЛОВИЯ НА КРИЗА

Доц. д.н. Цветелина Търпоманова, доц. д.н. Веселина Славова

Книжка 4s
DETERMINING THE DEGREE OF DIGITALIZATION OF A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION

Acad. DSc. Hristo Beloev, Prof. Dr. Angel Smrikarov, Assoc. Prof. DSc. Valentina Voinohovska, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Galina Ivanova

A STUDY ON THE POSSIBILITIES TO INTEGRATE THE MODERN 3D TECHNOLOGIES IN THE SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

Prof. Dr. Georgi Hristov, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Plamen Zahariev, Assist. Prof. Dr. Diyana Kinaneva, Assist. Prof. Georgi Georgiev

THE ROLE OF THE UNIVERSITIES AS ACCELERATORS FOR THE INTEGRATION OF THE STEM LEARNING METHODS IN THE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS

Prof. Dr. Georgi Hristov, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Plamen Zahariev, Assist. Prof. Georgi Georgiev

ОТ STEM КЪМ BEST: ДВА СТАНДАРТА, ЕДНА ЦЕЛ

Проф. д-р Андрей Захариев, проф. д-р Стефан Симеонов, гл. ас. д-р Таня Тодорова

ВЪЗМОЖНОСТИ ЗА ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА БЛОКЧЕЙН ТЕХНОЛОГИЯТА В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Докторант Андриан Минчев, доц. д-р Ваня Стойкова

ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВА НА ДИГИТАЛНАТА ТРАНСФОРМАЦИЯ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО – СРАВНИТЕЛЕН АНАЛИЗ НА СТУДЕНТСКОТО МНЕНИЕ

Гл. ас. д-р Мирослава Бонева, доц. д-р Антон Недялков, проф. д.н. Милена Кирова

CHALLENGES, REQUIREMENTS, OPPORTUNITIES AND SOLUTIONS FOR THE DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE TRANSPORT EDUCATION

Prof. Dr. Georgi Hristov, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Plamen Zahariev

Книжка 4
EFFECT OF RESILIENCE ON BURNOUT IN ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

Dr. Radina Stoyanova, Prof. Sonya Karabeliova, Petya Pandurova, Dr. Nadezhda Zheckova Dr. Kaloyan Mitev

STATE AND PROSPECTS OF DEVELOPMENT OF ACADEMIC MOBILITY IN THE SYSTEM OF TRAINING A SPECIAL EDUCATION SPECIALIST

Dr. Tetiana Dokuchyna, Assoc. Prof., Prof. Dr. Svitlana Myronova, Dr. Tetiana Franchuk, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 3s
STRATEGIES AND POLICIES TO SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT OF AI TECHNOLOGIES IN EUROPE

Assoc. Prof. Miglena Molhova, Assoc. Prof. Petya Biolcheva

BULGARIA'S TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH THE PRISM OF HIGHER EDUCATION POLICIES

Assoc. Prof. Ivaylo B. Ivanov, Assoc. Prof. Miglena Molhova

INTELLIGENT ANIMAL HUSBANDRY: FARMER ATTITUDES AND A ROADMAP FOR IMPLEMENTATION

Prof. Dr. Dimitrios Petropoulos, Koutroubis Fotios Assoc. Prof. Petya Biolcheva Evgeni Valchev

EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES IN TOURISM THROUGH MOTIVATION

Assoc. Prof. Fahri Idriz Assoc. Prof. Marin Geshkov

Книжка 3
САМООЦЕНКА НА ОБЩООБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИТЕ И РЕСУРСНИТЕ УЧИТЕЛИ ЗА РАБОТА В ПАРАДИГМАТА НА ПРИОБЩАВАЩОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Проф. д.н. Милен Замфиров, проф. Емилия Евгениева, проф. Маргарита Бакрачева

STUDY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE USE OF COMMUNICATIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS OF ENGINEERS TRAINING

Assoc. Prof. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof. Valentina Vasileva Assoc. Prof. Sergii Bilan, Assoc. Prof. Maria Bondar, Assoc. Prof. Oksana Bulgakova, Assoc. Prof. Lyubov Shymko

SAFETY THROUGH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE MARITIME INDUSTRY

Assoc. Prof. Petya Biolcheva Evgeni Valchev, PhD student

Книжка 2
РАЗПОЛОЖЕНИЕ НА ВИСШИТЕ УЧИЛИЩА В БЪЛГАРИЯ В КОНТЕКСТА НА ФОРМИРАНЕ НА ПАЗАРА НА ТРУДА

Гл. ас. д-р Цветелина Берберова-Вълчева, доц. д-р Камен Петров, доц. д-р Николай Цонков

CHARACTERISTICS AND COMPONENTS OF THE CYBER HYGIENE AS A SUBCLASS OF CYBER SECURITY IN MILITARY ENVIRONMENT AND EDUCATIONAL ISSUES

Prof. Boyan Mednikarov, DSc. Prof. Yuliyan Tsonev Dr. Borislav Nikolov, Prof. Andon Lazarov, DSc.

Книжка 1
MODERNIZATION OF THE CONTENT OF THE LECTURE COURSE IN PHYSICS FOR TRAINING FUTURE AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERS

Dr. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Valentina Vasileva, Assoc. Prof. Prof. Vasyl Shynkaruk, DSc., Assoc. Prof. Oksana Bulgakova, Assoc. Prof. Maria Bondar Assoc. Prof. Lesia Zbaravska, Assoc. Prof. Sergii Slobodian

THE NEW PANDEMIC NORMAL THROUGH THE EYES OF BULGARIAN STUDENTS

Prof. Vyara Stoilova, Assoc. Prof. Todorka Kineva

2022 година
Книжка 6
ORGANIZATION OF AN INCLUSIVE EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT FOR THE STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS

Prof. Halyna Bilavych Prof. Nataliia Bakhmat Prof. Tetyana Pantiuk, Prof. Mykola Pantiuk Prof. Borys Savchuk

ДИГИТАЛИЗАЦИЯ НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО В БЪЛГАРИЯ: СЪСТОЯНИЕ И ОБЩИ ТЕНДЕНЦИИ

Д-р Теодора Върбанова, проф. д-р Албена Вуцова, доц. д-р Николай Нетов

СКРИНИНГ НА ЗРЕНИЕТО – ПРОФИЛАКТИКА И ЕЛЕМЕНТ ОТ ПРАКТИКАТА НА СТУДЕНТИ И ОБУЧЕНИЕТО НА УЧЕНИЦИ

Руска Драганова-Христова, д-р Славена Стойкова, доц. д-р Снежана Йорданова

Книжка 5
ПРАВОТО НА ИЗБОР В ЖИВОТА НА ДЕЦАТА В РЕПУБЛИКА БЪЛГАРИЯ

Проф. д.п.н. Сийка Чавдарова-Костова, гл. ас. д-р Даниела Рачева, ас. Екатерина Томова, доц. д-р Росица Симеонова

SUSTAINABLE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH COACHING: BENEFITS FOR TEACHERS AND LEARNERS

Assoc. Prof. Irina Ivanova, Assoc. Prof. Penka Kozhuharova, Prof. Rumyana Todorova

SELF-ASSESSMENT – A COMPONENT OF THE COMPETENCE-BASED TRAINING IN THE PROFESSION “APPLIED PROGRAMMER”

Assoc. Prof. Ivaylo Staribratov, Muharem Mollov, Rosen Valchev Petar Petrov

Книжка 4
BENCHMARKING FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SPEED AND POWER CHARACTERISTICS

Assist. Prof. Dr. Darinka Ignatova Assoc. Prof. Dr. Alexander Iliev

DIAGNOSIS AS A TOOL FOR MONITORING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ADDICTION PREVENTION IN ADOLESCENTS

Prof. O.A. Selivanova Assoc. Prof. N.V. Bystrova, Assoc. Prof. I.I. Derecha, Assoc. Prof. T.S. Mamontova, Assoc. Prof. O.V. Panfilova

Книжка 3
ПУБЛИЧНОТО РАЗБИРАНЕ НА НАУКАТА В МРЕЖОВИЯ СВЯТ

Д-р Светломир Здравков, д-р Мартин Й. Иванов, д-р Петя Климентова

ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ ЗА УСТОЙЧИВО РАЗВИТИЕ – ПРАКТИКО-ПРИЛОЖНИ АСПЕКТИ

Гл. ас. д-р Златка Ваклева Проф. д-р Тоня Георгиева

Книжка 2
PREPARATION OF PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS FOR COMMUNICATIVE AND RHETORICAL ACTIVITY IN SCHOOL IN THE CONTEXT OF THEIR PRACTICAL TRAINING

Prof. Halyna Bilavych Prof. Nataliia Bakhmat Prof. Tetyana Pantyuk, Prof. Mykola Pantyuk Prof. Borys Savchuk

ПРОЛЕТНА КОНФЕРЕНЦИЯ НА СЪЮЗА НА МАТЕМАТИЦИТЕ В БЪЛГАРИЯ

(Трявна, 5 – 9 април 2022) Гл. ас. д-р Албена Симова

Книжка 1
ДИГИТАЛНАТА ИНТЕРАКЦИЯ ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛ – СТУДЕНТ В ОНЛАЙН ОБУЧЕНИЕТО В МЕДИЦИНСКИТЕ УНИВЕРСИТЕТИ

Д-р Миглена Търновска, д-р Румяна Стоянова Доц. Боряна Парашкевова, проф. Юлияна Маринова

2021 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ЕДНА РЕКАПИТУЛАЦИЯ НА ИЗСЛЕДВАНИЯ ВЪРХУ ИНТЕРКУЛТУРНИТЕ ОТНОШЕНИЯ. КАКВО СЛЕДВА ОТ ТОВА ЗА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО?

Давидков, Ц., 2019. Изследвания върху културите. Културни ориентири на управлението. София: СУ „Св. Климент Охридски“, ISBN 978-954-9399-52-3 Проф. Пламен Макариев

Книжка 4s
RECOGNITION OF FAKE NEWS IN SPORTS

Colonel Assoc. Prof. Petko Dimov

SIGNAL FOR HELP

Ina Vladova, Milena Kuleva

Книжка 4
PREMISES FOR A MULTICULTURAL APPROACH TO EDUCATION

Dr. Anzhelina Koriakina, Assoc. Prof., Prof. Lyudmila Amanbaeva, DSc.

ПОЗИТИВНА ПСИХОЛОГИЯ: ПРОБЛЕМНИ ОБЛАСТИ И ФОРМИРАНЕ НА ЛИЧНОСТТА

Доц. д-р Стоил Мавродиев, Любомира Димитрова

КНИГА ЗА ИСТОРИЯТА НА БЪЛГАРСКОТО ВИСШЕ ИНЖЕНЕРНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Сгурев, В., Гергов, С., Иванов, Г., 2019. Положителните науки с приложение към индустрията. История на висшето техническо образование в България. София: Изд. на БАН „Проф. Марин Дринов“, Изд. „Захарий Стоянов“. ISBN 978-619-245-004-5, ISBN 978-954-09-1387-2.

Книжка 3
ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND INTERDISCIPLINARY EDUCATION – SEMIOTIC ASPECTS

Prof. Dr. Christo Kaftandjiev Dr. Diana Kotova

THE PRACTICAL IMPORTANCE OF ACCOUNTING EDUCATION FOR FUTURE MANAGERS

Nataliia Radionova, DSc. Dr. Radostina Stoyanova, Assist. Prof.

ЗА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНАТА ИНТЕГРАЦИЯ И ЗАЛОЗИТЕ НА НАСТОЯЩЕТО

Нунев, Й., 2020. Мониторинг на процесите на приобщаване и образователна интеграция и модели за десегрегация на ромското образование. Пловдив: Астарта, ISBN 978-954-350-283-7

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
METHODOLOGY OF SAFETY AND QUALITY OF LIFE ON THE BASIS OF NOOSPHERIC EDUCATION SYSTEM FORMATION

Nataliia Bakhmat Nataliia Ridei, Nataliia Tytova, Vladyslava Liubarets, Oksana Katsero

ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ В УСТОЙЧИВО РАЗВИТИЕ И ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЕ „ДЕТЕ – СРЕДА“

Стоянова, М. (2020). Образование в устойчиво развитие и взаимодействие „дете – среда“ София: Авангард принт. ISBN 978-954-337-408-3

2020 година
Книжка 6
HIGHER EDUCATION AS A PUBLIC GOOD

Yulia Nedelcheva, Miroslav Nedelchev

Книжка 5
НАСЪРЧАВАНЕ НА СЪТРУДНИЧЕСТВОТО МЕЖДУ ВИСШИТЕ УЧИЛИЩА И БИЗНЕСА

Добринка Стоянова, Блага Маджурова, Гергана Димитрова, Стефан Райчев

Книжка 4
THE STRATEGY OF HUMAN RIGHTS STUDY IN EDUCATION

Anush Balian Nataliya Seysebayeva Natalia Efremova Liliia Danylchenko

Книжка 3
ПОМОЩНИ СРЕДСТВА И ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ПРИОБЩАВАЩОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Янкова, Ж. (2020). Помощни средства и технологии за деца и ученици със специални образователни потребности в приобщаващото образование.

Книжка 2
МИГРАЦИЯ И МИГРАЦИОННИ ПРОЦЕСИ

Веселина Р. Иванова

SOCIAL STATUS OF DISABLED PEOPLE IN RUSSIA

Elena G. Pankova, Tatiana V. Soloveva, Dinara A. Bistyaykina, Olga M. Lizina

Книжка 1
ETHNIC UPBRINGING AS A PART OF THE ETHNIC CULTURE

Sholpankulova Gulnar Kenesbekovna

ЗА СВЕТЛИНАТА, КОЯТО ИЗЛЪЧВА… В ПАМЕТ НА ПРОФ. Д.П.Н. АСЕМГУЛ МАЛДАЖАНОВА

Нашата редколегия загуби един все- отдаен и неповторим колега и приятел – проф. д.п.н. Асемгул Малдажанова. Пе- дагог по призвание и филолог по мисия! Отиде си от нас нашият приятел, коле- га и член на редколегията на списанието – професор д.п.н. Асемгул Малдажанова – първи заместник-ректор на Евразийския

2019 година
Книжка 6
EMOTIONAL COMPETENCE OF THE SOCIAL TEACHER

Kadisha K. Shalgynbayeva Ulbosin Zh.Tuyakova

Книжка 5
„ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИ КИНОХОРИЗОНТИ“ В ПОЛЕТО НА МЕДИА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

(2018). Образователни кинохоризонти. Международен сборник с научни публи- кации по проект „Естетически и образователни проекции на кинодидактиката“. Бургас: Проф. д-р Асен Златаров. Съставител: Маргарита Терзиева. ISBN 978-954-471-496-3

Книжка 4
ВИСШЕТО МОРСКО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ В КОНКУРЕНТНА СРЕДА

Бакалов, Я. (2019). Висше морско образование. Лидиране в конкурентна среда. Варна: Стено. ISBN 978-619-241-029-2

Книжка 3
УЧИЛИЩЕТО НА БЪДЕЩЕТО

Наталия Витанова

Книжка 2
КНИГА ЗА УСПЕШНИТЕ НАУЧНИ ПУБЛИКАЦИИ

Кожухаров, А. (2018). Успешните научни публикации. Варна: Тера Балканика. ISBN 978-619-90844-1-0

Книжка 1
POST-GRADUATE QUALIFICATION OF TEACHERS IN INTERCULTURAL EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT

Irina Koleva, Veselin Tepavicharov, Violeta Kotseva, Kremena Yordanova

ДЕЦАТА В КОНСТИТУЦИОННИТЕ НОРМИ НА БЪЛГАРИЯ

Румен Василев, Весела Марева

СЪСТОЯНИЕ НА БЪЛГАРСКОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Анелия Любенова Любомир Любенов

ИНТЕРКУЛТУРНИЯТ ТРЕНИНГ КАТО ЧАСТ ОТ СТРАТЕГИЯТА ЗА ГЛОБАЛИЗАЦИОННА ИНТЕГРАЦИЯ

Хубенова, М. (2018). Значение на междукултурната комуникация за направления: политически науки, право, икономика и бизнес. София: Издателски комплекс УНСС. ISBN 978-619-232-072-0

ЕДИН НОВ УЧЕБНИК

Дончева, Ю. (2018). Теоретични и методически основи на запознаване с околния свят в детската градина. Русе: Лени Ан

2018 година
Книжка 6
СТРАТЕГИИ НА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНАТА И НАУЧНАТА ПОЛИТИКА НАУЧНО СПИСАНИЕ STRATEGIES FOR POLICY IN SCIENCE AND EDUCATION EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL ГОДИНА XXVI / VOLUME 26, 2018 ANNUAL CONTENTS / ГОДИШНО СЪДЪРЖАНИЕ СТРАНИЦИ / PAGES КНИЖКА 1 / NUMBER 1: 1 – 120 КНИЖКА 2 / NUMBER 2: 121 – 224 КНИЖКА 3 / NUMBER 3: 225 – 336 КНИЖКА 4 / NUMBER 4: 337 – 448 КНИЖКА 5 / NUMBER 5: 449 – 560 КНИЖКА 6 / NUMBER 6: 561 – 664

ДИСКУСИОННО / DISCUSSION 211 – 216: Процедурата за назначаване на ръководител на катедра като причина за вло- шаващото се качество на обучението и микроклимата във висшите учи лища у нас [The Procedure for Appointing a Head of Department as a Reason for the Deteriorating Quality of Education and the Microclimate in the Higher School] / Александър Димит- ров / Alexander Dimitrov

Книжка 5
A NEW AWARD FOR PROFESSOR MAIRA KABAKOVA

The staff of the Editorial board of the journal “Strategies for Policy in Science and Education” warmly and sincerely congratulates their Kazakhstan colleague -

ПРОДЪЛЖАВАЩАТА КВАЛИФИКАЦИЯ НА УЧИТЕЛИТЕ – НОРМАТИВЕН И ИЗСЛЕДОВАТЕЛСКИ ОБЗОР

(научно-теоретично обобщение върху проведени обучения на учители)

ЕТНОЦЕНТРИЗМЪТ И ИНЕРЦИИТЕ ОТ МИНАЛОТО – СЕРИОЗНИ ПРОБЛЕМИ В БЪЛГАРСКАТА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА СИСТЕМА

(Eтнопедагогически аспекти на основното и средното образование) Веселин Тепавичаров

Книжка 4
ХРИСТО БОТЕВ И ПОЗНАВАТЕЛНИЯТ КРЪГОЗОР НА СЪВРЕМЕННИТЕ СТУДЕНТИ ЗА ЕВРОПА

Изследователски разказ за един познавателен подвиг и за една познавателна недостатъчност

Книжка 3
BLENDED EDUCATION IN HIGHER SCHOOLS: NEW NETWORKS AND MEDIATORS

Nikolay Tsankov Veska Gyuviyska Milena Levunlieva

ВЗАИМОВРЪЗКАТА МЕЖДУ СПОРТА И ПРАВОТО

Ивайло Прокопов, Елица Стоянова

НАДНАЦИОНАЛНИ И МЕЖДУПРАВИТЕЛСТВЕНИ МЕТОДИ НА ИНТЕГРАЦИЯ В ОБЛАСТТА НА ПРАВОСЪДИЕТО И СИГУРНОСТТА

(Формиране на обща миграционна политика: парадигми и образователни аспекти) Лора Махлелиева-Кларксън

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
ВЪЗПРИЯТИЯ И НАГЛАСИ НА УЧЕНИЦИТЕ ПО ВАЖНИ ОБЩЕСТВЕНИ ВЪПРОСИ

(Данни от Международното изследване на гражданското образование – ICCS 2016)

2017 година
Книжка 6
ЗНАЧИМОСТТА НА УЧЕНЕТО: АНАЛИЗ НА ВРЪЗКИТЕ МЕЖДУ ГЛЕДНИТЕ ТОЧКИ НА УЧЕНИЦИ, РОДИТЕЛИ И УЧИТЕЛИ

Илиана Мирчева, Елена Джамбазова, Снежана Радева, Деян Велковски

ВЪЗПРИЯТИЯ И НАГЛАСИ НА УЧЕНИЦИТЕ ПО ВАЖНИ ОБЩЕСТВЕНИ ВЪПРОСИ

(Данни от Международното изследване на гражданското образование – ICCS 2016)

СТРАТЕГИИ НА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНАТА И НАУЧНАТА ПОЛИТИКА НАУЧНО СПИСАНИЕ STRATEGIES FOR POLICY IN SCIENCE AND EDUCATION EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL ГОДИНА XXV / VOLUME 25, 2017 ANNUAL CONTENTS / ГОДИШНО СЪДЪРЖАНИЕ

СТРАНИЦИ / PAGES КНИЖКА 1 / NUMBER 1: 1 – 112 КНИЖКА 2 / NUMBER 2: 113 – 224 КНИЖКА 3 / NUMBER 3: 225 – 336 КНИЖКА 4 / NUMBER 4: 337 – 448 КНИЖКА 5 / NUMBER 5: 449 – 552 КНИЖКА 6 / NUMBER 6: 553 – 672

Книжка 5
ОРГАНИЗАЦИОННА КУЛТУРА В УЧИЛИЩЕ

Ивайло Старибратов, Лилия Бабакова

Книжка 4
КОУЧИНГ. ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЕН КОУЧИНГ

Наталия Витанова, Нели Митева

Книжка 3
ТЕХНОХУМАНИЗМЪТ И ДЕЙТЪИЗМЪТ – НОВИТЕ РЕЛИГИИ НА БЪДЕЩЕТО

Harari, Y. N. (2016). Homo Deus. A Brief History of Tomorrow. Harvill Secker. ISBN-10: 1910701874

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
РЕФОРМИТЕ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО – ПЕРСПЕКТИВИ И ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВА

Интервю с Габриела Миткова, началник на Регионалното управление на образованието – Силистра

ЕМПАТИЯ И РЕФЛЕКСИЯ

Нели Кънева, Кристиана Булдеева

2016 година
Книжка 6
СТРАТЕГИИ НА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНАТА И НАУЧНАТА ПОЛИТИКА НАУЧНО СПИСАНИЕ STRATEGIES FOR POLICY IN SCIENCE AND EDUCATION EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL ГОДИНА XXIV / VOLUME 24, 2016 ANNUAL CONTENT / ГОДИШНО СЪДЪРЖАНИЕ

СТРАНИЦИ / PAGES КНИЖКА 1 / NUMBER 1: 1 – 120 КНИЖКА 2 / NUMBER 2: 121 – 232 КНИЖКА 3 / NUMBER 3: 233 – 344 КНИЖКА 4 / NUMBER 4: 345 – 456 КНИЖКА 5 / NUMBER 5: 457 – 568 КНИЖКА 6 / NUMBER 6: 569 – 672

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2014 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
КОХЕРЕНТНОСТ НА ПОЛИТИКИ

Албена Вуцова, Лиляна Павлова

Книжка 4
ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО ПО ПРАВАТА НА ЧОВЕКА ПРЕЗ ПОГЛЕДА НА ДОЦ. ЦЕЦКА КОЛАРОВА

Цецка Коларова. (2013). Образование по правата на човека. София: Авангард Прима. ISBN 978-619-160-234-6

USING THE RESULTS OF A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT

Thomas Kellaghan Vincent Greaney T. Scott Murray Chapter 4 Translating Assessment Findings Into Policy And Action Although the primary purpose of a system of national assessment is to describe students’ learning, its role is not limited to description. To justify the effort and expenditure involved, the information that an assessment provides about the achievements of students, their strengths and weaknesses, and how they are distributed in the population (for example, by gender or location

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF UNIVERSITY FACULTY: А SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS

Gulnar Toltaevna Balakayeva Alken Shugaybekovich Tokmagambetov Sapar Imangalievich Ospanov

ЗА ПО-ХУМАНИСТИЧНА ТРАДИЦИОННО- ИНОВАЦИОННА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНО-ВЪЗПИТАТЕЛНА СТРАТЕГИЯ У НАС

(КОНЦЕПТУАЛНА РАЗРАБОТКА В ПОМОЩ НА ПОДГОТОВКАТА НА НОВ ЗАКОН ЗА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО)

Книжка 1
РЕФЛЕКСИЯТА В ИНТЕГРАТИВНОТО ПОЛЕ НА МЕТОДИКАТА НА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО ПО БИОЛОГИЯ

Иса Хаджиали, Наташа Цанова, Надежда Райчева, Снежана Томова

USING THE RESULTS OF A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT

Thomas Kellaghan Vincent Greaney T. Scott Murray Chapter 1 Factors affecting the use and nonuse of national assessment fi ndings The main objectives of a national assessment, as set out in volume 1 of this series, Assessing National Achievement Levels in Education, are to determine (a) how well students are learning in the education system (with reference to general expectations, aims of the curriculum, and preparation for further learning and for life); (b) whether there is evidence of par

2013 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
Книжка 4
QUESTIONNAIRE DEVELOPMENT

ÎÖÅÍßÂÀÍÅÒÎ

РОССИЙСКАЯ СИСТЕМА ОЦЕНКИ КАЧЕСТВА ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ: ГЛАВНЫЕ УРОКИ

В. Болотов / И. Вальдман / Г. Ковалёва / М. Пинская

Книжка 3
MASS MEDIA CULTURE IN KAZAKHSTAN

Aktolkyn Kulsariyeva Yerkin Massanov Indira Alibayeva

РОССИЙСКАЯ СИСТЕМА ОЦЕНКИ КАЧЕСТВА ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ: ГЛАВНЫЕ УРОКИ

В. Болотов / И. Вальдман / Г. Ковалёва / М. Пинская

Книжка 2
ОЦЕНЯВАНЕ НА ГРАЖДАНСКИТЕ КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТИ НА УЧЕНИЦИТЕ: ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВА И ВЪЗМОЖНОСТИ

Светла Петрова Център за контрол и оценка на качеството на училищното образование

Книжка 1
Уважаеми читатели,

вет, както и от международния борд за предоставените статии и студии, за да могат да бъдат идентифицирани в полето на образованието пред широката аудитория от педа- гогически специалисти във всички степени на образователната ни система. Благодаря за техния всеотдаен и безвъзмезден труд да създават и популяризират мрежа от научни съобщества по профила на списанието и да насърчават научните изследвания. Благодаря на рецензентите от национално представените висши училища, на- учни институции и

METHODS FOR SETTING CUT SCORES IN CRITERION – REFERENCED ACHIEVEMENT TESTS

ÎÖÅÍßÂÀÍÅÒÎ COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE QUALITY OF THE SEPARATE METHODS

ПУБЛИКАЦИИ ПРЕЗ 2012 Г.

СПИСАНИЕ „БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕЗИК И ЛИТЕРАТУРА“

2012 година
Книжка 6
DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE IN KAZAKHSTAN IN THE PERIOD OF INDEPENDENCE

Aigerim Mynbayeva Maira Kabakova Aliya Massalimova

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
СИСТЕМАТА ЗА РАЗВИТИЕ НА АКАДЕМИЧНИЯ СЪСТАВ НА РУСЕНСКИЯ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ „АНГЕЛ КЪНЧЕВ“

Христо Белоев, Ангел Смрикаров, Орлин Петров, Анелия Иванова, Галина Иванова

Книжка 2
ПРОУЧВАНЕ НА РОДИТЕЛСКОТО УЧАСТИЕ В УЧИЛИЩНИЯ ЖИВОТ В БЪЛГАРИЯ

* Този материал е изготвен въз основа на резултатите от изследването „Parental Involvement in Life of School Matters“, проведено в България в рамките на проек- та „Advancing Educational Inclusion and Quality in South East Europe“, изпълняван

ВТОРИ ФОРУМ ЗА СТРАТЕГИИ В НАУКАТА

Тошка Борисова В края на 2011 г. в София се проведе второто издание на Форум за страте- гии в науката. Основната тема бе повишаване на международната видимост и разпознаваемост на българската наука. Форумът се организира от „Elsevier“ – водеща компания за разработване и предоставяне на научни, технически и медицински информационни продукти и услуги , с подкрепата на Министер- ството на образованието, младежта и науката. След успеха на първото издание на Форума за стратегии в науката през

Книжка 1
РЕЙТИНГИ, ИНДЕКСИ, ПАРИ

Боян Захариев