Стратегии на образователната и научната политика

https://doi.org/10.53656/str2023-6-6-imp

2023/6, стр. 653 - 667

IMPLEMENTATION OF MOTOR COMPLEXES BASED ON SPECIALISED APPLICATION SYSTEM BLAZE-POD TRAINER

Darinka Ignatova
OrcID: 0000-0002-0564-584X
E-mail: dignatova@diuu.uni-sofia.bg
Department for Information and In-Service Training of Teachers
University of Sofia
224 Tzar Boris III Blvd.
1619 Sofia Bulgaria

Резюме: The current material focuses on the creation of a new technology for the development of motor quality, agility and improvement of general motor condition through an author's set of motor exercises based on the specialized BlazePod Trainer application and verification of its practical effectiveness. The following are monitored: the scientific state of teaching methodology in physical education and sports at the initial stage of the educational degree. According to the nature and essence of the goals, the experimental research is constative-diagnostic and innovative in its part of testing the innovative methodology in practice. A statistical verification of the effectiveness of a tested technology is presented with the following organization of the experimental activity: ascertaining, forming and control stage. Scientifically based conclusions and generalizations are made. The purpose of the research is to create an innovative technology for the development and improvement of general motor condition, based on the specialized Blaze-Pod Trainer application, by implementing and proving its practical effectiveness through testing in PES1 training, consisting of an author's complex of motor exercises . The subject of research is the achievements in the development of motor quality, agility and improvement of general motor condition. The object of research is the learning process related to the development of motor quality, agility, improvement of the general motor condition of third grade students. The research contingent is forty four third-graders, aged 9-10 years, distributed as follows: twenty-two students in the experimental group (EG) and twenty-two students in the control group (CG). In order to derive a relationship between the tracked motor indicators, a dynamics analysis was applied through mathematicalstatistical processing to establish correlation dependencies and determine variation coefficients. The application of the innovative technology took place within the academic year 2022/23 in a metropolitan school.

Ключови думи: implementation of motor complexes; specialized Blaze-Pod Trainer application; motor activity; motor quality agility; motor condition

Introduction

The present article brings out the theoretical foundations of the problem, emphasizing the development of motor capabilities and specificity in the development of the motor qualities of students in the initial stage of the basic educational level. A technology for developing motor quality, agility and improving the general motor condition of third-graders through an author's complex of motor exercises with an exposed conceptual, substantive and procedural framework is presented. Averification of the effectiveness of an innovative technology is presented with the following: organization of experimental activity in three cognitive stages of experimental research – abscertaining, formative and control stage. Conclusions and summaries have been drawn from the conducted research (Ignatova, Iliev 2022, 2020).

The development of a motor author complex system based on the specialized Blaze-Pod Trainer application is relevant and important not only for increasing the quality of modern motor training in the conditions of sports education, but also for the future professional and social realization of the students after graduation. The present study presents the results of research into the development of the motor quality, agility and improvement of the general motor condition of third graders through an author's complex of motor exercises (Dimitrova 2020; 2029; 2019a).

Methods

The object of research is the learning process related to the development of motor quality, agility, improvement of the general motor condition of third grade students.

The subject of research is the achievements in the development of motor quality, agility and improvement of general motor condition.

The aim of the research is to create a new technology for the development of motor quality, agility and improvement of general motor condition through an author's complex of motor exercises and verification of its practical effectiveness.

The following research tasks also arise from the formulated goal:

• Analysis of the theoretical and methodical literature on the problem;

• Analysis of educational practice for the development of motor quality, agility and improvement of general motor condition;

• Development and implementation in practice of the new technology for the development of motor quality, agility and improvement of general motor condition.

• Carrying out a pedagogical experiment;

• Collection and processing of empirical data from the cognitive research stages of the experiment;

• Mathematical-statistical processing of the researched empirical data;

• Proving the effectiveness of the innovative technology;

• Analysis of the results of the tested technology in practice;

• Conclusions and summaries for multiplying the effect of the implemented innovation.

The following research hypothesis was formed:

As a result of the application of technology for the development of motor quality, agility and improvement of the level of general motor condition through an author's complex of motor exercises, it will increase the level of development of motor capacity.

In the course of the research, the following research methods were used:

• Theoretical analysis;

• Pedagogical experiment;

• Testing;

• Survey;

• Mathematical and statistical methods.

Results and analysis

The research contingent is forty-four third-graders, aged 9-10 years, distributed as follows: twenty-two students in the experimental group (EG) and twenty-two students in the control group (CG). The research has a practical-applied nature and is aimed at developing the students' motor potential. According to the nature and essence of the goals, the experimental research is constative-diagnostic and innovative in its part of testing the innovative methodology in practice.

Pedagogical testing also has its limitations. Through it, results are revealed for various achievements in the tracked contingent, but the reasons for successes and failures remain hidden. The data registered through pedagogical testing are valid only for the tracked research period, in this case the academic year 2022 – 2023.

Table 1. Parametric motor indicators2

PhysicalqualityCharacteristicTestUnitsAccuracyIncrement1SpeedMovement speedRunning 30m.sec.0,01 sec.-2MaximumstrengthStatic forceStandinglong jumpcm.1 cm.+3MaximumstrengthExplosive powerStandinglong jumpcm.1 cm.+4PowerEnduranceStrength endurance– arms and shouldergirdleThrowing asolid ballcm.1 cm.+5FlexibilityMobility of the spineShuttle run200mcm.0,01 sec.-6AgilityBody balanceT-testcm.0,01 sec.-

The evaluation of the results was carried out on a 20-point scale (Based on sistema, 2019). In order to establish the changes in the general motor condition, the studied contingent was subjected to double testing in the two cognitive stages of the study (initial and final) on four motor indicators. For comparative analysis, the best performance of the two measurements is taken.

In the experimental group (EG) in the ascertainment stage, the results show a good assessment of the general motor condition. The results of the EG third graders test battery show that eighteen EG third graders scored Good, representing 81.82% of all twenty-two EG third graders tested in the ascertainment stage. Two third graders (9.09%) received a Very Good grade and two (9.09%) received an Average grade. There are none among the third-graders from EG who received an Excellent grade during the ascertaining stage – table 2; diagram 1).

Table 2. Results EG – ascertaining stage

Total numberVerbal assessmentNumberof children%22Average – D29,09Good – C1881,82Very good – B29,09

Diagram 1. Evaluating EG results – ascertaining stage

Table 3. Results – EG ascertaining stage

#GENDER30m running(sec)Standing jump(cm)Throwing asolid ball (cm)Shuttle run(seconds)T-test(seconds)PointsGrades1.m5,3416263042,8413,1414C2.m5,0115368339,0614,419C3.m5,9815541051,6913,2510C4.m6,4114542051,0314,1911C
5.w5,6415046043,9113,849C6.w5,8714048549,1014,0014C7.m5,7815744045,7816,8814C8.w6,1314037051,1517,5312C9.w5,9414344043,5315,2511C10.w6,1014139043,5118,168C11.m5,6216063048,7815,777D12.m6,8213762058,8821,389C13.m5,3716058043,8114,197D14.m5,8414346050,6017,378C15.m6,2213040048,5013,2210C16.m7,0613849056,8214,8715B17.w6,0314147048,3714,4414C18.w7,0914032054,4715,9615B19.w6,1614257055,2519,5714C20.w6,9114543050,0315,5314C21.w6,7213543053,2513,5911C22.w8,2513030059,1520,1016C

Table 4. Results CG – ascertaining stage

#GENDER30m running(sec)Standing jump(cm)Throwing asolid ball (cm)Shuttle run(seconds)T-test(seconds)PointsGrades1.m5,5114053045,2414,3414C2.m5,7014340046,7515,6615B3.w5,4913450049,6815,4011C4.w5,2313745047,1215,7911C5.m6,0211242045,1215,1610C6.w6,0310443061,0116,3013C7.w6,0112545051,6616,0214C8.w6,1611546056,8519,5213C9.w5,4614055049,1516,2212C10.w5,2512643042,4816,5010C11.w5,1513860046,3614,6710C12.m5,7813842052,9214,1810C13.m5,6111040042,7012,8910C
14.m6,0911051054,7716,1311C15.m5,6215037041,9013,5011C16.m5,3815040039,2013,3414C17.w4,9716061048,1815,7713C18.w5,7116050049,6814,3514C19.m6,2011360057,5118,6913C20.m5,6812542057,5116,0913C21.m5,4317062050,0016,0912C22.w6,4011050060,0417,1014C

The empirical expression in the values of the results in the tracked motor indicators is reflected in the study of the third graders from the control group through the ascertaining stage of table 4. The results of the test assessment of the third graders from the same target group at the ascertaining stage show a Good assessment of the general motor condition of the children. The results of the test battery of third graders from the control group show that twenty-one third graders from the same target group received a Good grade, which represents 95.45% of all tested twentytwo third graders from the control target group during the ascertainment stage (compared to the experimental group – 81.82%). Only one of the third graders from the control group (4.55%) received a Very Good grade (compared to the experimental group – 9.09%). There are no third-graders from the control group who received an Excellent grade (for comparison with the experimental group – also) or an Average grade (for comparison with the experimental group – 9.09%) during the ascertainment stage (see table 5; diagram 2).

Table 5. Results – CG through ascertainment stage

Total numberVerbal assessmentNumber of children%Good – C2195,45Very good – B14,5595%5%EvaluatingresultsCG-ascertainingstageAverage -DGood -C

Diagram 2. Evaluating results CG – ascertaining stage

During the testing during the ascertaining stage, the third graders from the experimental group registered a less developed general motor condition with an average score of 11.45 points, compared to the general motor condition of the third graders from the control group with an average result of 12.18 points, during the ascertaining stage – the data are reflected in diagram 3. The results for motor quality agility (diagram 3) were almost identical for the third graders from the experimental group (average – 15.76 seconds) and the third graders from the control group (average – 15.62 seconds).

Diagram 3. EG / CG - general motor condition and agility - ascertaining stage

The registered results after applying the author's technology are reflected in table 6.

Table 6. Results - EG through control stage

#GENDER30m running(sec)Standingjump (cm)Throwinga solid ball(cm)Shuttle run(seconds)T-test(seconds)PointsGrades1.m4,8717778041,6912,9716B2.m4,9417280036,3113,2119A3.m5,5317161245,7813,418A4.m5,9916860044,4113,4819A5.w5,3117060040,1212,8519A6.w5,7915961045,1813,9219A7.m5,1317161340,1214,1319A8.w5,8516251845,8414,5717B9.w5,1816657041,1614,5518A10.w5,6016260043,715,9718A11.m5,0217377043,315,5217B
12.m6,0015071049,8116,1919A13.m4,9217271,743,2212,6917B14.m4,7816769244,1214,1218A15.m5,4015752043,2512,9718A16.m6,0315057049,1713,9119A17.w5,1216557044,1813,8818A18.w6,0216249545,5913,9019A19.w5,0216673046,214,9818A20.w5,1216959047,314,0519A21.w5,3115563048,1213,2018A22.w8,2515249050,0217,1319A

The results of the test assessment of the third graders from the experimental group during the control stage show a good assessment of the general motor condition of the children (table 6). The results of the test battery of the third graders from the same target group after an approved author's complex of motor exercises show that there are no students who received a Good grade compared to eighteen third graders (81.82%) who received a Good grade from the experimental group during the control stage (table 7). Four students or (18.18%) compared to two third graders (9.09%) in the ascertainment stage received a Very Good grade, a double increase was recorded. There were no third graders from the experimental group during the control stage who received an Average grade compared to one (4.55%) during the ascertainment stage. While in the testing during the ascertainment stage, there are no third graders from the experimental group who received an Excellent grade (see table 8), in the testing after an approved author's complex of motor exercises, eighteen students received an Excellent grade, which represents 81.82% of the twenty two students from the experimental group tested during the ascertainment stage – according to data from table 7.

Table 7. Results EG - control stage

Total numberVerbal assessmentNumber of children%22Very good - B418,18Excellent- A1881,82

Compared to the results of the ascertaining stage after testing the author's complex of motor exercises, the third graders from the experimental target group increased their average rating for general motor condition from Good to Excellent – as shown in diagram 4.

Diagram 4. Evaluation results – EG control stage

The registered results during the control stage of the control group are shown in table 8.

Table 8. Results - CG control stage

#GENDER30m running(sec)Standingjump (cm)Throwinga solid ball(cm)Shuttle run(seconds)T-test(seconds)PointsGrades1.m5,5015059043,2214,3417B2.m5,6915640044,3315,6619A3.m5,5914057046,6914,6616B4.m5,1915255045,114,1615B5.w5,1213048044,1315,1015B6.w5,8511044047,916,1817B7.m5,9113846048,6915,0618A8.w5,8113740046,0415,5917B9.w5,1514740046,9314,2717B10.w5,5613043240,9215,1515B11.m5,3715062042,091516B12.m5,7715046049,011916B13.m5,311404303914,4715B14.m6,0313955046,2115,9616B15.m5,0919042038,2915,7116B16.m5,0618755040,8813,1218B17.w5,3818072047,1516,5917B
18.w5,8717052047,3516,2118A19.w5,8712067051,8119,0017B20.w5,691404805615,5417B21.w5,518266048,2414,816B22.w6,0611556052,6718,0018A

The results of the test evaluation of the control group during the control stage show a Very Good evaluation of the general motor condition compared to the Good evaluation during the ascertaining stage (table 8 and diagram 5) and compared to the Excellent evaluation of the results of the experimental group during the control stage (table 6). The results of the test battery of the third graders from the control group during the control stage show that eighteen third graders received a Very Good rating, which represents 81.82% of all tested twenty-two third graders from the same target group during the control stage (for comparison, 4.55% during the ascertainment stage – table 6 and 18.18% for the experimental group during the control stage – table 7). There are no third graders from the control group who received a Good grade in the control stage compared to 95.45% in the ascertainment stage (Table 5). Only four of the third graders from the control group (18.18%) received an Excellent score for general motor condition during the control stage, according to data from table 8, compared to 81.82% of the experimental group, according to data from table 9.

Table 9. Results CG – control stage

Total numberVerbal assessmentNumber of children%22Excellent– A418,18Very good – B1881,82

We use graphical representation to more accurately represent the nature of recorded changes than established changes in empirical data.

Diagram 5. Evaluation results CG – control stage

During the testing during the control stage, the third-graders from the experimental group showed a more developed general-motor condition with an average score of 18.23 points, compared to the general-motor condition of the third-graders from the control group during the control stage with an average score of 16.64 points – according to data reflected in diagram 6. The results for motor quality agility during the control stage in the experimental group with a mean score of 14.16 sec. were better than the results for motor quality agility during the control stage in the control group with a mean score of 15.61 seconds, according to data reflected in diagram 6.

Diagram 6. Results – general motor condition and agility – control stage

The scores of third graders from the experimental group during the control stage for general-motor condition increased by an average of 6.78 points compared to the scores for general-motor condition during the ascertainment stage. Scores from the control group through the control stage for general motor condition increased by an average of 3.84 points. A double-higher increase in the results for general motor condition is reported from an experimental target group after an approved author's complex of motor exercises in the academic year 2022 – 2023. The results of the third graders of the experimental group for motor quality agility improved on average by – 1.57 seconds after the approved author's complex. Third graders in the control group's motor quality agility scores during the control phase worsened by 0.01 seconds compared to the finding phase.

Diagram 7. Results of general-motor condition and agility

Discussion

The applied technology for developing the motor quality of agility and improving the general motor condition of third graders through an author's complex of motor exercises led to the development of the motor quality of agility in the monitored contingent.

– The present study, mathematically and statistically, confirms that the applied technology for developing the motor quality of agility and improving the general motor condition of the studied contingent has increased the level of motor quality of agility and the level of general motor condition.

– The present study established an excellent assessment of the general motor condition of the third graders after an approved author's complex of motor exercises in the academic year 2022 – 2023, compared to the established Good assessment of the general motor condition during the ascertaining stage.

– The present study established a very good assessment of the general motor condition of the third graders in the control target group compared to the established Good assessment of the general motor condition for the same target group during the ascertainment stage.

– The present study established a significant development of the motor quality of agility of the studied contingent after an approved author's complex of motor exercises, compared to the insignificant development of the motor quality of agility of the third graders from a control target group.

According to the tracked motor indicators, the studied contingent registered the following results within the experimental period:

• The third graders from the experimental group and from the control target group show a Good rating for general motor condition at the ascertainment stage.

• The third graders from the experimental target group show an Excellent rating for general motor condition after the approved author's complex in the control target group, who register a Very Good rating during the control stage.

• Improvement of the general motor condition of the third-grade students through the author's complex of motor exercises is significant in the children of the experimental group compared to the insignificant improvement in the third-grade students of the control target group.

• The increase in the results for the general motor condition of the third graders from the experimental target group is higher than the increase in the results of the control target group.

• There is a concentration of high borderline achievements for improving the motor condition in the studied contingent from an experimental target group after the approval of an author's complex.

A ratio of 1:4 was found for the studied contingent from the control target group with an Excellent rating for general motor condition during the control stage compared to the third graders from an experimental target group with an Excellent rating for general motor condition after an approved author's complex of motor exercises.

The third-graders from the experimental target group registered significantly better results in the development of the motor quality of agility after testing the author's complex compared to the lack of development for the same indicator among the third-graders from the control target group. There was no reported improvement in the motor quality of agility in the third graders from the control group.

On the face is a concentration of high borderline achievements for development in motor quality agility in the research contingent from the experimental target group after testing an author's complex of motor exercises.

There is a ratio of 1:3, of the tracked research contingent, with a high degree of development of the motor quality of agility during the control stage compared to the third graders with a high degree of development of the motor quality of agility after an approved author's complex of motor exercises.

Homogeneity was found in the group of third-graders studied when testing for the general motor condition of an experimental target group during the control stage, in contrast to the inhomogeneous group of the third graders tested when testing for the general motor condition of a control group during the two cognitive stages.

Homogeneity of the group of the studied contingent from the experimental group was established when testing for motor quality agility through a control stage.

There is an absolute positive correlation between the established improvement in the parameters of the general motor condition and the established excellent parametric indicators in the development of motor quality agility after the approval of the author's set of motor exercises related to the Blaze-Pod Trainer system.

The applied technology for the development of motor quality agility and improvement of general motor condition through an author's complex of motor exercises led to an Excellent rating in general motor condition, considering the development of the motor quality agility of the tracked contingent.

Conclusion

In order to achieve the maximum health effect of sports activities, the educational content of the programs should advocate the complex development of motor skills. This is achieved through means and methods outside the direct gaming activity, indirectly affecting it, as well as those that are part of the direct gaming activity. Complex development in the abilities of adolescents, enrichment of knowledge and stimulation of the need for movement are the directions in which to work to improve the effectiveness of training to increase motor culture. In this way, applying innovative methods and approaches to improve motor capacity, in the specific study presented in the present work, namely the approved author's complex of motor exercises related to the Blaze-Pod Trainer system, the pedagogical progress will be personalized and a culture for a healthy lifestyle and sports (wellness) will be guaranteed, objectifying the subject of physical education and sports even more fully in support of the new legislation.

An answer will be provided to the stated requirements for the development of key competences, laid down in the legislative requirement for knowledge and skills for sustainable development and a healthy lifestyle and sport through the means of the subject of physical education and sport, which is expressed in the ninth key competence of the Law on Secondary Education, mandatory for all academic subjects. The assumption was confirmed that after a load in physical education and sports training, indicators of motor quality, agility and general motor condition in third-grade students improved in the 2022 – 2023 school year.

The current experimental study defended the thesis that these are the directions in which work should be done to improve the effectiveness of physical education and sports training in secondary education, as well as enriching knowledge and stimulating the need for movement for a positive impact on the overall development and complex construction of certain personal characteristics in upgrading the motor culture in adolescents.

NOTES

1. Physical Education and Sport - educational discipline in the Bulgarian school.

2. A battery of control tests with indicators.

REFERENCES

DIMITROVA, B. 2019. Quality assessment about standards for wellness services and certified skills of specialized staff. Trakia Journal of Sciences, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 143 – 149, ISSN: 1313-3551 (online). DOI:10.15547/tjs.2019.02.007.

DIMITROVA, B. 2019a. New smart educational model "Wellness instructor". Sofia: Avangard Prima. ISBN: 978-619-239-150-8.

DIMITROVA, B. 2020. Relationships between education and innovations in the recreation Industry in Bulgaria. Trakia Journal of Sciences, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 194 – 202, ISSN: 1313-3551 (online). DOI: 10.15547/tjs.2020.03.003.

IGNATOVA, D. & A. ILIEV. 2022. Benchmarking of Dynamics to Development of Speed and Power Characteristics. Strategies for Policy in Science and Education-Strategii na Obrazovatelnata i Nauchnata Politika, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 411 – 421. DOI: https://strategies.azbuki.bg/.

IGNATOVA, D. & A. ILIEV. 2020. Motor qualities and their influence on the children’s development. International Scientific Journal: Smart Innovations in Recreational, Wellness Industry and Niche Tourism, vol. 2, no. 1 – 2, pp. 16 – 44. ISSN: 2603-4921 (online). Available at: https://scjournal.globalwaterhealth.org/.

IVANOVA, V. 2019. Influence of gymnastic exercises in the water environment. International Scientific Journal: Smart Innovations in Recreational, Wellness Industry and Niche Tourism, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 53 – 56. ISSN: 2603-4921 (online). Available at: https://scjournal. globalwaterhealth.org/.

2025 година
Книжка 6
UNLOCKING THE POTENTIAL OF ESG AND AI IN HIGHER EDUCATION FINANCE: INSIGHTS FROM A STUDY ACROSS FIVE EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

Tina Vukasović, Rok Strašek, Liliya Terzieva;, Elenita Velikova, Justyna Tomala, Maria Urbaniec, Jarosław Pawlik, Michael Murg, Anita Maček

THE ROLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION FOR THE PROFESSIONAL REALIZATION OF STUDENTS – PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS

Anny Atanasova, Viktoriya Kalaydzhieva, Radostina Yuleva-Chuchulayna, Kalina Durova-Angelova

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
ТРАНСФОРМАЦИИ НА ПАЗАРА НА ТРУДА И НУЖДАТА ОТ ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИ РЕФОРМИ

Ваня Иванова, Андрей Василев, Калоян Ганев, Ралица Симеонова-Ганева

Книжка 3
FORMING ENTREPRENEURIAL CULTURE THROUGH EDUCATION

Milena Filipova, Adriana Atanasova

Книжка 2s
THE STATE OF INCLUSION IN ADAPTED BASKETBALL

Stefka Djobova, Ivelina Kirilova

Книжка 2
MODEL OF PROFESSIONALLY DIRECTED TRAINING OF FUTURE ENGINEER-TEACHERS

Ivan Beloev, Valentina Vasileva, Іnna Savytska, Oksana Bulgakova, Lesia Zbaravska, Olha Chaikovska

DETERMINANTS AFFECTING ACADEMIC STAFF SATISFACTION WITH ONLINE LEARNING IN HIGHER MEDICAL EDUCATION

Miglena Tarnovska, ;, Rumyana Stoyanova, ;, Angelina Kirkova-Bogdanova;, Rositsa Dimova

Книжка 1s
AN INNOVATIVE MODEL FOR DEVELOPING DIGITAL COMPETENCES OF SOCIAL WORKERS

Lyudmila Vekova, Tanya Vazova, Penyo Georgiev, Ekaterina Uzhikanova-Kovacheva

Книжка 1
2024 година
Книжка 6s
DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES RISK MANAGEMENT

Miglena Molhova-Vladova, Ivaylo B. Ivanov

Книжка 6
AN INTEGRATIVE APPROACH TO ORGANIZING THE FORMATION OF STUDENTS’ COGNITIVE INDEPENDENCE IN CONDITIONS OF INTENSIFICATION OF LEARNING ACTIVITIES

Albina Volkotrubova, Aidai Kasymova, Zoriana Hbur, Antonina Kichuk, Svitlana Koshova, Svitlana Khodakivska

ИНОВАТИВЕН МОДЕЛ НА ПРОЕКТНО БАЗИРАНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ НА ГИМНАЗИАЛНИ УЧИТЕЛИ: ДОБРА ПРАКТИКА ОТ УниБИТ

Жоржета Назърска, Александър Каракачанов, Магдалена Гарванова, Нина Дебрюне

Книжка 5s
КОНЦЕПТУАЛНА РАМКА ЗА ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА ИЗКУСТВЕНИЯ ИНТЕЛЕКТ ВЪВ ВИСШЕТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Акад. Христо Белоев, Валентина Войноховска, Ангел Смрикаров

ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ ПРИЛОЖИМОСТТА НА БЛОКОВИ ВЕРИГИ ОТ ПЪРВО НИВО (L1) В СИСТЕМА ЗА ЕЛЕКТРОННО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Андриан Минчев, Ваня Стойкова, Галя Шивачева, Доц Анелия Иванова

ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВА ПРИ ПРОМЯНА НА ПЛАТФОРМИ ЗА ДИСТАНЦИОННО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Антон Недялков, Милена Кирова, Мирослава Бонева

APPLICATION OF ZSPACE TECHNOLOGY IN THE DISCIPLINES OF THE STEM CYCLE

Boyana Ivanova, Kamelia Shoilekova, Desislava Atanasova, Rumen Rusev

TEACHERS' ADAPTATION TO CHANGES IN AN INCREASINGLY COMPLEX WORLD THROUGH THE USE OF AI

Zhanat Nurbekova, Kanagat Baigusheva, Kalima Tuenbaeva, Bakyt Nurbekov, Tsvetomir Vassilev

АТОСЕКУНДНОТО ОБУЧЕНИЕ – МЕТАФОРА НА ДНЕШНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Юлия Дончева, Денис Асенов, Ангел Смрикаров, Цветомир Василев

Книжка 5
Книжка 4s
Книжка 4
MANAGERIAL ASPECTS OF COOPERATION AMONG HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THEIR STAKEHOLDERS

Olha Prokopenko, Svitlana Perova, Tokhir Rakhimov, Mykola Kunytskyi, Iryna Leshchenko

Книжка 3s
Книжка 3
Книжка 2
FORMATION OF PROFESSIONAL SKILLS OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERS DURING LABORATORY PRACTICE WHEN STUDYING FUNDAMENTAL SCIENCE

Ivan Beloev, Oksana Bulgakova, Oksana Zakhutska, Maria Bondar, Lesia Zbaravska

ИМИДЖ НА УНИВЕРСИТЕТА

Галя Христозова

Книжка 1s
COMPETITIVENESS AS A RESULT OF CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION

Nikolay Krushkov, Ralitza Zayakova-Krushkova

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND SECURITY IN THE INTEGRATED CIRCUITS INDUSTRY

Ivan Nachev, Yuliana Tomova, Iskren Konstantinov, Marina Spasova

Книжка 1
PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Milena Filipova, Olha Prokopenko, Igor Matyushenko, Olena Khanova, Olga Shirobokova, Ardian Durmishi

2023 година
Книжка 6s
DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMON INFORMATION SYSTEM TO CREATE A DIGITAL CAREER CENTER TOGETHER WITH PARTNER HIGHER SCHOOLS

Yordanka Angelova, Rossen Radonov, Vasil Kuzmov, Stela Zhorzh Derelieva-Konstantinova

DRAFTING A DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION STRATEGY FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT SECTOR – EMPIRICAL STUDY ON UAE

Mounir el Khatib, Shikha al Ali, Ibrahim Alharam, Ali Alhajeri, Gabriela Peneva, Jordanka Angelova, Mahmoud Shanaa

VOYAGE OF LEARNING: CRUISE SHIPS WEATHER ROUTING AND MARITIME EDUCATION

Svetlana Dimitrakieva, Dobrin Milev, Christiana Atanasova

СТРУКТУРНИ ПРОМЕНИ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО НА МЕНИДЖЪРИ ЗА ИНДУСТРИЯ 5.0

Недко Минчев, Венета Христова, Иван Стоянов

RESEARCH OF THE INNOVATION CAPACITY OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS

Siya Veleva, ; Margarita Mondeshka, Anka Tsvetanova

Книжка 6
Книжка 5s
ВИДОВЕ ТРАВМИ В ПАРАШУТИЗМА И ПРЕВЕНЦИЯТА ИМ

Капитан III ранг Георги Калинов

Книжка 5
Книжка 4s
DETERMINING THE DEGREE OF DIGITALIZATION OF A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION

Acad. Hristo Beloev, Angel Smrikarov, Valentina Voinohovska, Galina Ivanova

ОТ STEM КЪМ BEST: ДВА СТАНДАРТА, ЕДНА ЦЕЛ

Андрей Захариев, Стефан Симеонов, Таня Тодорова

Книжка 4
EFFECT OF RESILIENCE ON BURNOUT IN ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

Radina Stoyanova, Sonya Karabeliova, Petya Pandurova, Nadezhda Zheckova, Kaloyan Mitev

Книжка 3s
INTELLIGENT ANIMAL HUSBANDRY: FARMER ATTITUDES AND A ROADMAP FOR IMPLEMENTATION

Dimitrios Petropoulos, Koutroubis Fotios, Petya Biolcheva, Evgeni Valchev

Книжка 3
STUDY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE USE OF COMMUNICATIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS OF ENGINEERS TRAINING

Ivan Beloev, Valentina Vasileva, Sergii Bilan, Maria Bondar, Oksana Bulgakova, Lyubov Shymko

Книжка 2
РАЗПОЛОЖЕНИЕ НА ВИСШИТЕ УЧИЛИЩА В БЪЛГАРИЯ В КОНТЕКСТА НА ФОРМИРАНЕ НА ПАЗАРА НА ТРУДА

Цветелина Берберова-Вълчева, Камен Петров, Николай Цонков

Книжка 1
MODERNIZATION OF THE CONTENT OF THE LECTURE COURSE IN PHYSICS FOR TRAINING FUTURE AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERS

Ivan Beloev, Valentina Vasileva, Vasyl Shynkaruk, Oksana Bulgakova, Maria Bondar, Lesia Zbaravska, Sergii Slobodian

2022 година
Книжка 6
ORGANIZATION OF AN INCLUSIVE EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT FOR THE STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS

Halyna Bilavych, Nataliia Bakhmat, Tetyana Pantiuk, Mykola Pantiuk, Borys Savchuk

ДИГИТАЛИЗАЦИЯ НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО В БЪЛГАРИЯ: СЪСТОЯНИЕ И ОБЩИ ТЕНДЕНЦИИ

Теодора Върбанова, Албена Вуцова, Николай Нетов

Книжка 5
ПРАВОТО НА ИЗБОР В ЖИВОТА НА ДЕЦАТА В РЕПУБЛИКА БЪЛГАРИЯ

Сийка Чавдарова-Костова, Даниела Рачева, Екатерина Томова, Росица Симеонова

Книжка 4
DIAGNOSIS AS A TOOL FOR MONITORING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ADDICTION PREVENTION IN ADOLESCENTS

O.A. Selivanova, N.V. Bystrova, I.I. Derecha, T.S. Mamontova, O.V. Panfilova

Книжка 3
ПУБЛИЧНОТО РАЗБИРАНЕ НА НАУКАТА В МРЕЖОВИЯ СВЯТ

Светломир Здравков, Мартин Й. Иванов, Петя Климентова

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
ДИГИТАЛНАТА ИНТЕРАКЦИЯ ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛ – СТУДЕНТ В ОНЛАЙН ОБУЧЕНИЕТО В МЕДИЦИНСКИТЕ УНИВЕРСИТЕТИ

Миглена Търновска, Румяна Стоянова, Боряна Парашкевова, Юлияна Маринова

2021 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
Книжка 4s
SIGNAL FOR HELP

Ina Vladova, Milena Kuleva

Книжка 4
PREMISES FOR A MULTICULTURAL APPROACH TO EDUCATION

Anzhelina Koriakina, Lyudmila Amanbaeva

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
ПЪРВА СЕДМИЦА ДИСТАНЦИОННО ОБУЧЕНИЕ В СУ „ИВАН ВАЗОВ“ В СТАРА ЗАГОРА

Тони Чехларова, Динко Цвятков, Неда Чехларова

Книжка 1
METHODOLOGY OF SAFETY AND QUALITY OF LIFE ON THE BASIS OF NOOSPHERIC EDUCATION SYSTEM FORMATION

Nataliia Bakhmat, Nataliia Ridei, Nataliia Tytova, Vladyslava Liubarets, Oksana Katsero

2020 година
Книжка 6
HIGHER EDUCATION AS A PUBLIC GOOD

Yulia Nedelcheva, Miroslav Nedelchev

Книжка 5
НАСЪРЧАВАНЕ НА СЪТРУДНИЧЕСТВОТО МЕЖДУ ВИСШИТЕ УЧИЛИЩА И БИЗНЕСА

Добринка Стоянова, Блага Маджурова, Гергана Димитрова, Стефан Райчев

Книжка 4
THE STRATEGY OF HUMAN RIGHTS STUDY IN EDUCATION

Anush Balian, Nataliya Seysebayeva, Natalia Efremova, Liliia Danylchenko

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
МИГРАЦИЯ И МИГРАЦИОННИ ПРОЦЕСИ

Веселина Р. Иванова

SOCIAL STATUS OF DISABLED PEOPLE IN RUSSIA

Elena G. Pankova, Tatiana V. Soloveva, Dinara A. Bistyaykina, Olga M. Lizina

Книжка 1
ETHNIC UPBRINGING AS A PART OF THE ETHNIC CULTURE

Sholpankulova Gulnar Kenesbekovna

2019 година
Книжка 6
EMOTIONAL COMPETENCE OF THE SOCIAL TEACHER

Kadisha K. Shalgynbayeva, Ulbosin Zh.Tuyakova

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
УЧИЛИЩЕТО НА БЪДЕЩЕТО

Наталия Витанова

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
POST-GRADUATE QUALIFICATION OF TEACHERS IN INTERCULTURAL EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT

Irina Koleva, Veselin Tepavicharov, Violeta Kotseva, Kremena Yordanova

ДЕЦАТА В КОНСТИТУЦИОННИТЕ НОРМИ НА БЪЛГАРИЯ

Румен Василев, Весела Марева

СЪСТОЯНИЕ НА БЪЛГАРСКОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Анелия Любенова, Любомир Любенов

ЕДИН НОВ УЧЕБНИК

Ирина Колева

2018 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
A NEW AWARD FOR PROFESSOR MAIRA KABAKOVA

Irina Koleva, Editor-in-

Книжка 4
Книжка 3
BLENDED EDUCATION IN HIGHER SCHOOLS: NEW NETWORKS AND MEDIATORS

Nikolay Tsankov, Veska Gyuviyska, Milena Levunlieva

ВЗАИМОВРЪЗКАТА МЕЖДУ СПОРТА И ПРАВОТО

Ивайло Прокопов, Елица Стоянова

ХИМЕРНИТЕ ГРУПИ В УЧИЛИЩЕ

Яна Рашева-Мерджанова

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2017 година
Книжка 6
ЗНАЧИМОСТТА НА УЧЕНЕТО: АНАЛИЗ НА ВРЪЗКИТЕ МЕЖДУ ГЛЕДНИТЕ ТОЧКИ НА УЧЕНИЦИ, РОДИТЕЛИ И УЧИТЕЛИ

Илиана Мирчева, Елена Джамбазова, Снежана Радева, Деян Велковски

Книжка 5
ОРГАНИЗАЦИОННА КУЛТУРА В УЧИЛИЩЕ

Ивайло Старибратов, Лилия Бабакова

Книжка 4
КОУЧИНГ. ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЕН КОУЧИНГ

Наталия Витанова, Нели Митева

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
ЕМПАТИЯ И РЕФЛЕКСИЯ

Нели Кънева, Кристиана Булдеева

2016 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2015 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
Книжка 4
ПРАГМАТИЧНАТА ДИДАКТИКА

Николай Колишев

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2014 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
КОХЕРЕНТНОСТ НА ПОЛИТИКИ

Албена Вуцова, Лиляна Павлова

Книжка 4
USING THE RESULTS OF A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT

Thomas Kellaghan, Vincent Greaney, T. Scott Murray

Книжка 3
USING THE RESULTS OF A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT

Thomas Kellaghan, Vincent Greaney, T. Scott Murray

Книжка 2
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF UNIVERSITY FACULTY: А SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS

Gulnar Toltaevna Balakayeva, Alken Shugaybekovich Tokmagambetov, Sapar Imangalievich Ospanov

USING THE RESULTS OF A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT

Thomas Kellaghan, Vincent Greaney, T. Scott Murray

Книжка 1
РЕФЛЕКСИЯТА В ИНТЕГРАТИВНОТО ПОЛЕ НА МЕТОДИКАТА НА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО ПО БИОЛОГИЯ

Иса Хаджиали, Наташа Цанова, Надежда Райчева, Снежана Томова

USING THE RESULTS OF A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT

Thomas Kellaghan, Vincent Greaney, T. Scott Murray

2013 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
Книжка 4
QUESTIONNAIRE DEVELOPMENT

ÎÖÅÍßÂÀÍÅÒÎ

Книжка 3
MASS MEDIA CULTURE IN KAZAKHSTAN

Aktolkyn Kulsariyeva Yerkin Massanov Indira Alibayeva

РЪКОВОДСТВО ЗА СЪСТАВЯНЕ НА ТЕСТОВЕ*

Фернандо Картрайт, Джери Мусио

РОССИЙСКАЯ СИСТЕМА ОЦЕНКИ КАЧЕСТВА ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ: ГЛАВНЫЕ УРОКИ

В. Болотов / И. Вальдман / Г. Ковалёва / М. Пинская

Книжка 2
ОЦЕНЯВАНЕ НА ГРАЖДАНСКИТЕ КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТИ НА УЧЕНИЦИТЕ: ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВА И ВЪЗМОЖНОСТИ

Светла Петрова Център за контрол и оценка на качеството на училищното образование

РЪКОВОДСТВО ЗА СЪСТАВЯНЕ НА ТЕСТОВЕ*

Фернандо Картрайт, Джери Мусио

Книжка 1
Уважаеми читатели,

вет, както и от международния борд за предоставените статии и студии, за да могат да бъдат идентифицирани в полето на образованието пред широката аудитория от педа- гогически специалисти във всички степени на образователната ни система. Благодаря за техния всеотдаен и безвъзмезден труд да създават и популяризират мрежа от научни съобщества по профила на списанието и да насърчават научните изследвания. Благодаря на рецензентите от национално представените висши училища, на- учни институции и

РЪКОВОДСТВО ЗА СЪСТАВЯНЕ НА ТЕСТОВЕ

Фернандо Картрайт, Джери Мусио

2012 година
Книжка 6
DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE IN KAZAKHSTAN IN THE PERIOD OF INDEPENDENCE

Aigerim Mynbayeva Maira Kabakova Aliya Massalimova

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
СИСТЕМАТА ЗА РАЗВИТИЕ НА АКАДЕМИЧНИЯ СЪСТАВ НА РУСЕНСКИЯ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ „АНГЕЛ КЪНЧЕВ“

Христо Белоев, Ангел Смрикаров, Орлин Петров, Анелия Иванова, Галина Иванова

Книжка 2
ПРОУЧВАНЕ НА РОДИТЕЛСКОТО УЧАСТИЕ В УЧИЛИЩНИЯ ЖИВОТ В БЪЛГАРИЯ

* Този материал е изготвен въз основа на резултатите от изследването „Parental Involvement in Life of School Matters“, проведено в България в рамките на проек- та „Advancing Educational Inclusion and Quality in South East Europe“, изпълняван

ВТОРИ ФОРУМ ЗА СТРАТЕГИИ В НАУКАТА

Тошка Борисова В края на 2011 г. в София се проведе второто издание на Форум за страте- гии в науката. Основната тема бе повишаване на международната видимост и разпознаваемост на българската наука. Форумът се организира от „Elsevier“ – водеща компания за разработване и предоставяне на научни, технически и медицински информационни продукти и услуги , с подкрепата на Министер- ството на образованието, младежта и науката. След успеха на първото издание на Форума за стратегии в науката през

Книжка 1
РЕЙТИНГИ, ИНДЕКСИ, ПАРИ

Боян Захариев