Стратегии на образователната и научната политика

2024/3s, стр. 129 - 141

COMPARATIVE EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF TOURIST DESTINATIONS IN SELECTED COUNTRIES OF SOUTHERN AND SOUTH EAST EUROPE

Резюме:

Ключови думи:

1. Introduction

Tourism is among the fastest and constantly developing economic sectors in a large number of European countries. Due to the Covid pandemic, it faced many challenges, however, it is now slowly recovering. In a highly competitive environment, the attractiveness of this industry depends to a great extent on the efficiency of touristic destinations. Certain authors have focused on tourist destination efficiency as a prerequisite for economic growth, a chance for growing investment activity and a factor for increasing employment. There are numerous reasons for destinations to develop their primary touristic products, whose diversification could be a sustainable source of revenue, however, this might create many disadvantages during their incorrect repositioning (Farmaki 2012, Weaver & Lawton 2006).

The aim of this study is to complement existent research with examination of tourist destination efficiency in selected European countries. All countries which strive to attract new tourists, and increase their profit from tourism need a very serious analysis of their competitiveness as tourist destinations. The respective managers require appropriate competitive tourism strategies capable of dealing efficiently and effectively with the changing and dynamic environment that surrounds the tourism industry (Rodr‘guez et al. 2023). We have attempted to show how clustering and the efficiency of the destination may be used in the design of touristic strategies in order to obtain competitive advantage, even for countries which are approaching their limit of growth potential.

2. Literature review

Because the aim of the present study is to evaluate efficiency at a macrolevel in the paragraph below we have reviewed previous research that applies the DEA method and focuses on European countries in the last 10 years (Table 1). Sometimes DEA methodology is used to assess various regional differences in separate countries, or at a micro level to evaluate separate touristic subsectors, which rest outside the scope of the present article.

Table 1. Research applying DEA analysis to tourism

Author/sApplicationTimeframeCountryUsed variablesResultsCvetkoska, V.,&Bariѕic, P. 2017Analyzing theefficiency oftravel andtourism inthe EuropeanUnion201728 EUstatesTwo inputs:internal traveland tourismconsumptionand capitalinvestment. Twooutputs: traveland tourism‘stotal contributionto GDP andemployment.13 out of 28 EUcountries wererelatively efficient in2017, and 15werenot. Theaverageefficiency of thewhole sample is0.944, withmaximumefficiency of 1 and aminimum of 0.741.Cvetkoska andBarisic (2014)Measuringthe tourismefficiency2004201315 EUstatesTwo Inputfactors:visitorexports anddomestic traveland tourismspending;Output factorstravel andtourism’s totalcontribution toGDP, and traveland tourism’stotal contributionto employmentBased on theobtained results,itwas found thatthere is no countrythat is efficient inevery year in everywindow; 10 of the15 countries showefficiency results(overall efficiency byyears) over 95%: Italy(99.67%), Cyprus(99.64%), France(98.99%), Spain(98.99%),etc., whileMontenegro showedthe lowest overallefficiency (by years)(71.53%).Abad A,KongmanwatanaP (2015)Measuringtheperformanceof Europeancountries andendeavoursto explain thedispersion ofthe efficiencyrankingscores inthe EuropeanUnion (EU).20092011All EUmemberstateshowever,Malta isexcludedfrom thedatasetTwo outputfactors: Bed-nights in hotelsand similarestablishmentsand nights spentin campsitesInput factors:Humanresources,Hotels andsimilarestablishmentsCampsites,TourismattractionsThe generalconclusion is that 14EU member statesshow room forimprovement if theyare to achieve bestpractice proceduresidentified by efficientpeers specified inour benchmarkinganalysis. Moreprecisely, accordingto the BCC-O DEAmodel, therewere 12efficient DMUs amongthe 26 countries.
Soysal-Kurt, H.(2017)Measuringrelativeefficiency of29 Europeancountrieswith the dataof the year2013 usinginput-orientedand constantreturns toscale DataEnvelopmentAnalysis201329 EUstatesThree inputand threeoutput variablesare used toassess relativeperformances ofthe countries.In this study,tourismexpenses,number ofemployees andnumber of bedsare used asinput variables;tourism receipts,tourist arrivalsand number ofnights spent areused as outputvariablesAccording to thefindings, 16 countriesare found efficient;13 countries arefound inefficient.Efficient countrieswhose efficiencyscores are equal to 1are Cyprus, Croatia,Greece, Hungary,, Malta, Poland,Portugal, Spain andothers. Inefficientcountries whoseefficiency scores arefound less than 1 areBulgaria, Romania,Slovak Republic,Slovenia and others.Radovanov,B., Dudic, B.,Gregus, M.,Marcikic Horvat,A., & Karovic,V.(2020)2011201727 EUcountriesand fiveWesternBalkancountriesT&TInputfactor– GovernmentExpenditure,Output factors-T&TIndustryShare ofEmployment,Average Receiptper ArrivalSustainabilityof T&TIndustryDevelopmentThe results showrelative tourismefficiency per countryand year. Countrieswith the highesttourism efficiencyobtained by thementioned DEAmodel are Finland,Luxemburg, Croatia,Serbia, Austria,Sweden, Malta andGermany. Duringthe observed periodof time the lowestefficiency scores(below the averagescore of 80%)wereachieved in Romania,Italy, Lithuania,Bulgaria, Hungary,Poland and Slovakia.

Ilic, I., &Petrevska, I.(2018)DEAmethodused tomeasuretourismefficiency ofSerbia and thesurroundingcountries.201615 EUstatesTourist costsand the numberofbeds wereused as inputfactorsthe number ofarrivals, numberof nights spentand tourismrevenue wereused as theoutput factorsBased on the resultsin six countries arerelatively efficient,while nine countriesare relativelyinefficient. Efficientcountries that havea coefficient ofefficiency 1 are:Montenegro, Bosniaand Herzegovina,Croatia, Greece,Austriaand Albania.Inefficient countrieshave a coefficientof efficiency lessthan 1 (Serbia, FYRMacedonia, Slovenia,Romania, Bulgaria,Italy, Hungary,Slovakia and theCzech Republic).

In their study, Cvetkoska V, Barisic P (2014) have observed a total of 15 European countries over a period of 10 years (2004-2013). According to the obtained results, neither of the 15 states were active during the entire studied period. Also, 10 out of 15 countries showed over 95% of efficiency. Montenegro was determined the least efficient country, whilst other four states, such as Italy, Cyprus, France and Spain were the most efficient. Three years later, the same authors conducted a new study with a total of 11 states from the Balkans: Albania, Bosna and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Greece, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia and Turkey. For the timeframe 2010-2015 they used the same four variables from their previous study. They attributed the costs of the local and foreign tourists to the input factors, and as output factors they assessed the impact of the tourist industry on GDP and employment. The same authors discovered that for the studied period the most efficient state was Albania, followed by Croatia, Romania and Turkey, while the least efficient countries were Montenegro, Serbia and Bosna and Herzegovina Cvetkoska V, Barisic P (2017).

Abad A, Kongmanwatana P (2015) conducted a study for the period of 2009 – 2011 on a total of 26 EU states, except for Malta, by applying DEA analysis. Afterwards, they rated the countries according to their efficiency. Among the states with the highest rank were France, Italy, Greece, Slovenia, Spain, Portugal, etc. – a total of 12. The remaining 14 EU member states were shown to have potential to improve some of their characteristics, determined by the most efficient states indicated in the analysis. In this ranking Bulgaria occupied the 14th position, Hungary was 20, Poland was 24, and Romania was rated 26th.

Soysal-Kurt, H. (2017) aimed to assess the relative efficiency of 29 European countries in 2013. He used “the physical and human resources of each touristic destination as input factors of each virtual tourist process”. As a result of his analysis, 16 of all 29 states showed an efficient value from the DEA analysis, whereas 13 states were relatively inefficient. In other way we are agree with Idriz and Geshkov that “tourism is a business most dependable on human resources”. (Idriz & Geshkov 2023, p.135 )

Ilić, I., & Petrevska, I. (2018) have focused on the Balkan countries. They applied DEA through three input and three output variables. Out of a total of 15 Balkan states, they discovered 5 with an efficiency level 1: Montenegro, Bosna and Herzegovina, Greece, Albania and Austria, and also a very high value – 0,978 for Slovenia. The other 9 countries, including Serbia, Romania, and Bulgaria were not sufficiently efficient.

The authors Radovanov, B. et al. (2020) evaluated tourism efficiency at a macrolevel in a total of 27 EU countries and five West Balkan states over the period 2011 – 2017. The results from their study show that the average efficiency level of the sample was high (above 80%); therefore, they concluded that the tourism sector operated with high efficiency.

Another large-scale study by Gomez-Vega, M., Herrero-Prieto, L. C., & L–pez, M. V. (2022) on a total of 140 states and data from the World Economic Forum (WEF) for 2019 adopted two statistical techniques: а) cluster analysis to group countries and b) assessment of their efficiency as tourist destinations, through DEA analysis, which was later used as a result to build regression analysis that included significant external factors, determining efficiency. The variables used in the cluster analysis were Human Development Index – as a measure of human resource quality in tourism, GDP share and tourism competitiveness index from WEF’s database, that recapitulates the main tourism characteristics of individual countries.

3. Data and methodology

This study aims to present a model for measuring the tourist destination efficiency in selected countries in Europe and the Balkan Peninsula. As for the homogeneity of the data used in the analysis, we could outline several problematic points. We used characteristics of touristic destinations which were different in size and structure. In this case they could face a number of limitations, to which many analyses have been very sensitive. Our hypothesis for data homogeneity is based on their nature, and the fact that they compete for the same markets and they are all related to the same stakeholders. Nevertheless, non-discretionary factors may turn these observations into non-homogenous. On the other hand, we do not intend to provide the final data to the central authorities responsible for the studied problems, but rather to examine and direct the attention towards the comparative analysis of selected tourist destinations in Europe before and after their recovery from the Covid pandemic. In order to reach homogeneity of the groups, we used non-hierarchical k-means method based on the centroid approach. It operates by iteratively assigning data points to the nearest cluster centroid and recalculating the centroids until convergence (see eq.1).

the index set of points currently assigned to the cluster.

We used part of Gomez’s methodology (Gomez 2021) to highlight the contribution of tourism to the economic development of separate countries. After the clustering over the two studied periods for the separate clusters we applied the DEA method in order to discern the effective DMUs. The use of DEA is justified since it is recognized as applicable in scenarios where the goal is to provide a ranking of comparable units whose components cannot be strictly interpreted as inputs or outputs (Seiford 1996). On the basis of the theoretical grounds for the productive function and linear programming, DEA as a mathematical programming technique has widely been used in scientific literature as an easy non-parameter approach for determining the relative effectiveness of DMUs with specific input and output data (Charnes et al.1978). In order to evaluate efficiency, the DEA method provides a benchmark (frontier) against which competitors can identify areas of “best practices” associated with high measures of performance (Nurmatov 2021). Depending on the aims the author has set, the basic DEA models could be: the Charnes-Cooper-Rhodes (CCR) model that assumes constant returns to scale (CRS) and the Banker-Charnes-Cooper (BCC) model assuming variable returns to scale (VRS). The approach we have adopted in the present study is oriented to maximizing the output (see eq. 2). In DEA, there are two main available options: the constant returns to scale (CRS) and the variable returns to scale (VRS). In order to project each DMU on the efficiency limit, we formulated a mathematical programming model (LP), and added the primary DEA model underneath (eq.2).

where, the technical efficiency of country k using m inputs, s outputs.

Table 2. Production function variables

AbbreviationDescriptionRevenue (O)Tourism industry revenueEmployment (I)Person employment in tourism industryHotel rooms (I)Hotel rooms per 100 populationArrivals (I)Arrivals at tourist accommodation establishments

4. Discussion of the results

This section presents the results from the empirical application at two levels: k-cluster analysis and efficiency evaluation. As an uncontrolled machine learning method, the k-means algorithm chooses the cluster centers randomly and calculates the means of the data points of the cluster in order to generate clusters. Due to the limited range of the sample, we focused on two cluster groups, that we used afterwards to evaluate relative efficiency. When choosing variables, we applied Gomez’s methodology (Gomez 2021) which discerns the contribution of tourism to the economic development of the separate states, namely: GDP generated by the tourism industry in each country, HDI which measures the presence of quality personnel, efficiency and productivity on the labour market and the indicator for tourism competitiveness TTCI of WEF (2019), and TTDI (2021), which summarize the main ones under indications, such as regulations, business environment, natural and cultural resources (Table 3, fig.1).

Table 3. Cluster analysis results

Cluster 2019Cluster 20211212Tourism Direct GDP8.392.553.231.13Tourism competitiveness (1-7)4.323.964.434.01Human Development Index0.870.830.860.83Countries910910*Source:Author`s calculations.

Figure 1. Cluster of tourist destinations for 2021 with primary data

The reported results from the clustering in 2019 show that out of 19 countries in the sample there were 9 states with high and above average indicators for evaluation in the model. Among the remaining 10 states with average and lower indicators, the following are notable: North Macedonia, Poland, Moldova, Serbia, Slovenia and Bulgaria. These tourist destinations, despite the higher HDI and TCI values, have lower direct GDP.

The applied descriptive statistics in 2021 manifests a 60% drop in the contribution of the tourist industry to the GDP of the observed countries. Tourist destinations, which mark high and above average indicators during the two years were Portugal, Spain, Albania, Croatia, Georgia, Greece and Montenegro, which at 78% of the sample shows a certain sustainability of the results. Cyprus, Italy, Malta and Slovenia have poor results in 2021, and move to a second cluster due to a decrease in the three studied values.

After the clustering, in order to obtain homogenous groups, we applied DEA directed towards maximizing the output (revenue), for which we reported the relative efficiency of each cluster separately in the two timeframes. The aim was to discern the increase/ decrease of efficiency in the separate groups in 2019 and 2021.

Table 4. DEA results by clusters 2019

CLUSTER 1CLUSTER 2MinMaxMeanStd.devMinMaxMeanStd.devTourism revenue(O)450.22022912213440.6268843.934222501601.724.111753.91.32330838.22.3522078.11.37523034.71.2660.117402134000.1276,286.31352261582311.810616.52.752600280.8022259.74.604737320.57Tourist arrivals(I)Industry employment(I)Hotel rooms(I)Spain1Italy1Malta1Serbia0.7539Croatia0.9408Slovenia0.7436Portugal0.8760Hungary0.6463Greece0.8287Moldova0.5947Cyprus0.6258Bosna & Herzegovina0.5762Georgia0.4418Poland0.5464Monte Negro0.3162Bulgaria0.3401Albania0.2676Romania0.3007North Macedonia0.2509*Source:Author`s calculations.

The results presented in Table 4 show optimal (result maximization) in Spain and Malta. The last three countries from Cluster 1 have an efficiency of under 50%, which we suppose is due to the lower levels of tourist arrivals. In cluster 2, twothirds of the observed tourist destinations have an efficiency of over 50%. Low efficiency is evident in Bulgaria, Romania and North Macedonia.

Table 5. DEA results by clusters 2021

CLUSTER 1CLUSTER 2MinMaxMeanStd.devMinMaxMeanStd.devTourism revenue(O)0.902656000180000.61534.58080001441514.0511.082.37455857.71.9411.923.24588493.41.030.38717819630000.139.12225363184383.932.58505892099526.21.312.79675515897548.51.38Tourist arrivals(I)Industry Employment(I)Hotel rooms(I)Spain1Malta1Portugal1Hungary1Croatia1Moldova1Albania1Poland1Italy0.7867Serbia0.6203Greece0.7253Bosna & Herzegovina0.3616Georgia0.7085Romania0.3336Montenegro0.6052North Macedonia0.2543Slovenia0.3778Bulgaria0.1980Cyprus0.1215*Source:Author`s calculations.

The results for relative efficiency, presented in Table 5, strongly impress with the improved efficiency against the previous period of primarily Albania and Montenegro. These tourist destinations have recovered fast after the Covid pandemic. Only Slovenia has retained an efficiency under 50%. In the cluster 2 group for 2021 it may be affirmed that countries which could not recover successfully and lost efficiency are Bulgaria and Cyprus. It is necessary to mention the average efficiency of cluster 1 in 2021, which was 82%, while in cluster 2 it was 58%. These average values for 2019 reached 55 – 65%, which may hint a certain homogeneity of the entire sample.

5. Conclusion

The present study aimed to compare and assess the relative efficiency of tourist destinations in selected countries from Southern and Southeast Europe over two separate timeframes before and after the Covid pandemic. By using the non-parameter DEA analysis oriented towards maximizing the result and in view of tackling the heterogeneity of the sample, we applied k-means clustering, which facilitated the equalization of the data in the separate groups. The extracted two clusters over the two timeframes showed a certain sustainability of the results at 47% of all.

The contribution of the tourism industry to the GDP in 2021 was notably reduced by 60% for the selected destinations. We also observed sustainable efficiency results over the two timeframes for Spain, Portugal, Croatia and Greece, which validated previous research. On the other hand, tourist destinations with poor profitability indicators were Cyprus, Bulgaria and North Macedonia, which allows us to conclude that the aforementioned have slowly been restoring their tourism industry after Covid.

REFERENCES

ABAD, A., & KONGMANWATANA, P., 2015. Comparison of Destination Competitiveness Ranking in the European Union Using a Non-Parametric Approach. Tourism Economics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 267 – 281. DOI:10.5367/te.2014.0449.

CHARNES, A., COOPER, W., RHODES, E., 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 2 , no, 6, pp. 429 – 444.

CVETKOSKA, V.; BARISIC, P., 2014. Measuring the efficiency of certain European countries in tourism: DEA window analysis. In: ZIVKOVIC, Z., MIHAJLOVIC,I., DJORGJEVIC., P. (Eds). Book of proceedings of the international may conference on strategic management – IMKSM2014, pp 77 – 86. University of Belgrade, Technical Faculty in Bor, Management Department, Bor.

CVETKOSKA, V., & BARIŠIĆ, P., 2017. The efficiency of the tourism industry in the Balkans. Proceedings of the Faculty of Economics in East Sarajevo, vol.14, pp. 31 – 41.

FARMAKI, A., 2012. A Supply-Side Evaluation of Coastal Tourism Diversification: The Case of Cyprus. Tourism Planning&Development, vol. 9, no. 2, pp.183 – 203.

GOMEZ-VEGA, M.; HERRERO-PRIETO, L. C. & LÓPEZ, M. V., 2022. Clustering and country destination performance at a global scale: Determining factors of tourism competitiveness. Tourism Economics, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1605 – 1625.

IDRIZ, F., & GESHKOV, M., 2023. Effective management of human resources in tourism through motivation. Strategies for Policy in Science & Education-Strategii na Obrazovatelnata i Nauchnata Politika, vol. 31.no. 3S, pp. 126 – 139. DOI:10.53656/str2023-3s-10-eff.

ILIĆ, I., & PETREVSKA, I., 2018. Using DEA method for determining tourism efficiency of Serbia and the surrounding countries. Menadžment u hotelijerstvu i turizmu, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 73 – 80.

NURMATOV, R.; LOPEZ,H. & MILLAN, P., 2021. Tourism, hospitality, and DEA: Where do we come from and where do we go?, International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 95, pp.1 – 13, DOI:10.1016/j. ijhm.2021.102883.

RADOVANOV, B.; DUDIC, B.; GREGUS, M.; MARCIKIC HORVAT, A. & KAROVIC, V., 2020. Using a two-stage DEA model to measure tourism potentials of EU countries and Western Balkan countries: An approach to sustainable development. Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 12, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124903.

RODRÍGUEZ, M.; DÍAZ-FERN´ANDEZ, C. & PULIDO-PAV´ON, N., 2023. Tourist destination competitiveness: An international approach through the travel and tourism competitiveness index. Tourism Management Perspectives, vol. 47. DOI:10.1016/j.tmp.2023.101127

SEIFORD, L. M., 1996. Data envelopment analysis: The evolution of the state of the art (1978–1995). Journal of Productivity Analysis, vol. 7, no. 2, pp 99 – 137. DOI: 10.1007/BF00157037.

SOYSAL-KURT, H., 2017. Measuring tourism efficiency of European countries by using data envelopment analysis. European Scientific Journal, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 31 – 49.

UNWTO Tourism Data Dashboard | UNWTO. (2019/2021). World travel &tourism Council https://www.unwto.org/unwto-tourism-dashboard

WEAVER, D.; LAWTON, L., 2006. Tourism management. Milton, Queensland, Wiley, Australia.

2025 година
Книжка 4
ТРАНСФОРМАЦИИ НА ПАЗАРА НА ТРУДА И НУЖДАТА ОТ ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИ РЕФОРМИ

Ваня Иванова, Андрей Василев, Калоян Ганев, Ралица Симеонова-Ганева

Книжка 3
FORMING ENTREPRENEURIAL CULTURE THROUGH EDUCATION

Prof. Dr. Milena Filipova, Adriana Atanasova, PhD student

Книжка 2s
THE STATE OF INCLUSION IN ADAPTED BASKETBALL

Dr. Stefka Djobova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Ivelina Kirilova, Assist. Prof.

THE IMPACT OF AGE ON ADULT’S PARTICIPATION IN PHYSICAL ACTIVITIES DURING LEISURE TIME

Dr. Despina Sivevska, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Biljana Popeska, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 2
MODEL OF PROFESSIONALLY DIRECTED TRAINING OF FUTURE ENGINEER-TEACHERS

Prof. Ivan Beloev, Dr. Valentina Vasileva, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Іnna Savytska, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Oksana Bulgakova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lesia Zbaravska, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Olha Chaikovska, Assoc. Prof.

QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN BULGARIA: COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY TRAINING

Prof. Rositsa Doneva, Dr. Silvia Gaftandzhieva, Assoc. Prof.

ВЛИЯНИЕ НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО И ЧОВЕШКИЯ КАПИТАЛ ВЪРХУ ФОРМАЛНАТА И НЕФОРМАЛНАТА ИКОНОМИКА

Проф. д-р Стефан Петранов, доц. д-р Стела Ралева, доц. д-р Димитър Златинов

DETERMINANTS AFFECTING ACADEMIC STAFF SATISFACTION WITH ONLINE LEARNING IN HIGHER MEDICAL EDUCATION

Dr. Miglena Tarnovska, Assoc.Prof.; Dr. Rumyana Stoyanova, Assoc.Prof.; Dr. Angelina Kirkova-Bogdanova; Prof. Rositsa Dimova

Книжка 1s
CHALLENGES FACED BY THE BULGARIAN UNIVERSITIES IN THE CONTEXT OF SCIENCE – INDUSTRY RELATIONS

Dr. Svetla Boneva, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Nikolay Krushkov, Assoc. Prof.

INVENTING THE FUTURE: CAN BULGARIAN UNIVERSITIES FULFILL THEIR MISSION AS CATALYSTS FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH AND SUSTAINABILITY?

Dr. Ralitsa Zayakova-Krushkova, Assist. Prof., Dr. Alexander Mitov, Assoc. Prof.

AN INNOVATIVE MODEL FOR DEVELOPING DIGITAL COMPETENCES OF SOCIAL WORKERS

Prof Dr. Lyudmila Vekova, Dr. Tanya Vazova, Chief Assist. Prof., Dr. Penyo Georgiev, Chief Assist. Prof., Dr. Ekaterina Uzhikanova-Kovacheva

BUSINESS ASPECTS OF ACADEMIC PUBLISHING

Dr. Polina Stoyanova, Chief Assist. Prof.

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF MUSIC STREAMING

Dr. Dimiter Gantchev, Assist. Prof.

FILM INCENTIVE SCHEME IN THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA

Dr. Ivan Nachev, Assist. Prof.

PATENT PROTECTION OF DIGITAL TWINS

Dr. Vladislava Pаcheva, Chief Assist. Prof.

Книжка 1

МНОГОСТРАНЕН ПОДХОД ЗА ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ РАВНИЩЕТО НА ДИГИТАЛИЗАЦИЯ В ПОДГОТОВКАТА НА БЪДЕЩИ УЧИТЕЛИ

Доц. д-р Бистра Мизова, проф. д-р Румяна Пейчева-Форсайт Проф. д-р Харви Мелър

2024 година
Книжка 6s
DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES RISK MANAGEMENT

Dr. Miglena Molhova-Vladova, Dr. Ivaylo B. Ivanov

THE DUAL IMPACT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: CATALYST FOR INNOVATION OR THREAT TO STABILITY

Prof. Diana Antonova, Dr. Silvia Beloeva, Assist. Prof., Ana Todorova, PhD student

MARKETING IN TOURISM: PRACTICAL EVIDENCES

Dr. Fahri Idriz, Assoc. Prof.

DEVELOPMENT OF THE INFORMATION ECONOMY CONCEPT AND THE TRANSITION TO INDUSTRY 5.0

Dr. Dora Doncheva, Assist. Prof., Dr. Dimitrina Stoyancheva, Assoc. Prof.

THE GLOBAL MARKET AS A PROJECTION OF THE INFORMATION ECONOMY

Dr. Vanya Hadzhieva, Assist. Prof. Dr. Dora Doncheva, Assist. Prof.

ACADEMIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP: PRACTICAL RESULTS AND TRAINING

Prof. Nikolay Sterev, DSc., Dr. Daniel Yordanov, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 6
AN INTEGRATIVE APPROACH TO ORGANIZING THE FORMATION OF STUDENTS’ COGNITIVE INDEPENDENCE IN CONDITIONS OF INTENSIFICATION OF LEARNING ACTIVITIES

Dr. Albina Volkotrubova, Assoc. Prof. Aidai Kasymova Prof. Zoriana Hbur, DSc. Assoc. Prof. Antonina Kichuk, DSc. Dr. Svitlana Koshova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Svitlana Khodakivska, Assoc. Prof.

ИНОВАТИВЕН МОДЕЛ НА ПРОЕКТНО БАЗИРАНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ НА ГИМНАЗИАЛНИ УЧИТЕЛИ: ДОБРА ПРАКТИКА ОТ УниБИТ

Проф. д-р Жоржета Назърска, доц. д-р Александър Каракачанов, проф. д-р Магдалена Гарванова, доц. д-р Нина Дебрюне

Книжка 5s
КОНЦЕПТУАЛНА РАМКА ЗА ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА ИЗКУСТВЕНИЯ ИНТЕЛЕКТ ВЪВ ВИСШЕТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Акад. д.н. Христо Белоев, проф. д.н. Валентина Войноховска, проф. д-р Ангел Смрикаров

ИЗКУСТВЕНИЯТ ИНТЕЛЕКТ В БИЗНЕСА – ФИНАНСОВИ, ИКОНОМИЧЕСКИ И МАРКЕТИНГОВИ АСПЕКТИ

Проф. д-р Андрей Захариев, доц. д-р Драгомир Илиев Гл. ас. д-р Даниела Илиева

RECENT TRENDS AND APPLICATIONS OF THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE EDUCATION

Prof. Dr. Plamen Zahariev, Prof. Dr. Georgi Hristov, Prof. Dr. Ivan Beloev

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF UTILIZING POPULAR INTELLIGENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS IN EDUCATION

Dr. Galina Ivanova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Aleksandar Ivanov, Assoc. Prof.

CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF TRAINING IN REMOTE VIRTUAL SUPERVISION IN SOCIAL WORK

Dr. Silviya Beloeva, Assist. Prof. Dr. Nataliya Venelinova, Assist. Prof.

ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ ПРИЛОЖИМОСТТА НА БЛОКОВИ ВЕРИГИ ОТ ПЪРВО НИВО (L1) В СИСТЕМА ЗА ЕЛЕКТРОННО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Андриан Минчев, проф. Ваня Стойкова, гл. ас. д-р Галя Шивачева Доц д-р Анелия Иванова

DIGITAL DISCRIMINATION RISKS IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION

Dr. Silviya Beloeva, Assist. Prof. Dr. Nataliya Venelinova, Assist. Prof.

OPPORTUNITIES, CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS FOR DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESSES THROUGH 3D TECHNOLOGIES

Prof. Georgi Hristov, Prof. Plamen Zahariev, Dr. Diyana Kinaneva, Assist. Prof., Georgi Georgiev, Assist. Prof.

ДИГИТАЛНОТО ПОКОЛЕНИЕ VS. СЛЯТОТО, ПОЛУСЛЯТОТО И РАЗДЕЛНОТО ПИСАНЕ

Доц. д-р Владислав Маринов, ас. Анита Тодоранова

OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES FOR THE EDUCATION OF STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS IN THE DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT: THE NEW NORMAL

Prof. Julia Doncheva, DSc., Dr. Galina Ivanova, Assoc. Prof. Dilshod Tojievich Oblokulov

ИЗГРАЖДАНЕ НА КОМПЕТЕНЦИИ ЗА РАЗРАБОТВАНЕ НА STEM ОБУЧИТЕЛНИ РЕСУРСИ У БЪДЕЩИ УЧИТЕЛИ ПО ПРИРОДНИ НАУКИ

Доц. д-р Евгения Горанова, проф. д.н. Валентина Войноховска, проф. д-р Ангел Смрикаров

APPLICATION OF ZSPACE TECHNOLOGY IN THE DISCIPLINES OF THE STEM CYCLE

Boyana Ivanova, Assist. Prof. Dr. Kamelia Shoilekova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Desislava Atanasova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Rumen Rusev, Assoc. Prof.

TEACHERS' ADAPTATION TO CHANGES IN AN INCREASINGLY COMPLEX WORLD THROUGH THE USE OF AI

Prof. Zhanat Nurbekova, Kanagat Baigusheva, Kalima Tuenbaeva, Bakyt Nurbekov Prof. Tsvetomir Vassilev

АТОСЕКУНДНОТО ОБУЧЕНИЕ – МЕТАФОРА НА ДНЕШНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Проф. д.н. Юлия Дончева, Денис Асенов, проф. д-р Ангел Смрикаров проф. д-р Цветомир Василев

APPLICATION AND ASSESSMENT OF DIGITAL RESOURCES IN THE EDUCATION OF FUTURE PEDAGOGUES

Dr. Galina Ivanova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Milena Velikova, Assist. Prof.

IDENTIFYING PLAYER TYPES IN THE CLASSROOM FOR EFFECTIVE GAMIFICATION

Dr. Desislava Atanasova, Assoc. Prof., Viliana Molnar

DEVELOPMENT AND INTEGRATION OF AUDIO AND VISUAL MICRO-RESOURCES IN THE LEARNING PROCESS THROUGH THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS

Dr. Petya Stefanova, Assist. Prof., Dr. Assist. Elitsa Ibryamova, Assist. Prof., Prof. Angel Smrikarov, Dr. Galina Ivanova, Assoc. Prof.

АНАЛИЗ НА ПРОГРАМНИТЕ МОДЕЛИ ЗА АВТОМАТИЗИРАНЕ НА КОГНИТИВНИ ПРОЦЕСИ

Доц. д-р Валентин Атанасов Доц. д-р Анелия Иванова

Книжка 5
MANAGING A POSITIVE AND LIFE-SKILLS DEVELOPMENT IN THE SCHOOL-BASED CURRICULA: A LITERATURE REVIEW ON THE SUSTAINABLE EDUCATION

Dr. Lindita Durmishi, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Ardian Durmishi Prof. Milena Filipova Dr. Silva Ibrahimi

APPLICATION OF THE COMPETENCY MODEL IN BUSINESS ADMINISTARATION HIGHER EDUCATION IN HORIZON 2030

Prof. Nadya Mironova, Dr. Tatyana Kicheva, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Miglena Angelova, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 4s
THE EDUCATION AND RESEARCH IN THE QUADRUPLE HELIX AND THE REGIONAL INNOVATION PROSPECTS

Prof. Dr. Milen Baltov Dr. Stela Baltova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Vilyana Ruseva, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 4
ATTITUDES OF STUDENTS – FUTURE TEACHERS, FOR THE APPLICATION OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Assoc. Prof. Nikolay Tsankov, DSc. Dr. Ivo Damyanov, Assist. Prof.

EDUCATIONAL NEEDS OF THE JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITALIZATION

Dr. Diana Dimitrova, Dr. Darina Dimitrova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Velina Koleva

MANAGERIAL ASPECTS OF COOPERATION AMONG HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THEIR STAKEHOLDERS

Prof. Olha Prokopenko, DSc. Dr. Svitlana Perova, Assoc. Prof. Prof. Tokhir Rakhimov, DSc.

APPLICATION OF EDUCATIONAL STRATEGIES IN STUDYING THE DYNAMICS OF STATE POWER STRUCTURES: IMPLEMENTATION OF FORMAL AND INFORMAL MECHANISMS OF INFLUENCE

Prof. Stoyan Denchev, DSc. Dr. Miriyana Pavlova, Assist. Prof. Dr. Steliana Yordanova, Assist. Prof.

ДИАГНОСТИКА НА ФОРМИРАНАТА ПРОФЕСИОНАЛНА КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТ НА БЪДЕЩИ ИНЖЕНЕРИ ПО ЕНЕРГЕТИКА

Гл. ас. д-р Надя Илиева Доц. д-р Елена Бояджиева Ивалина Маринова

Книжка 3s
A MODEL FOR CALCULATING THE INDIRECT ADDED VALUE OF AI FOR BUSINESS

Dr. Petya Biolcheva, Assoc. Prof., Prof. Nikolay Sterev, DSc.

AI EFFECTIVENESS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF INVESTMENTS IN HIGH-RISK START-UPS

Sotir Ivanov, PhD Student, Dr. Petya Biolcheva, Assoc. Prof.

COMPETITIVENESS OF TEXTILE PRODUCERS IN DIGITAL BUSINESS ERA

Prof. Nikolay Sterev, DSc., Dr. Vyara Milusheva, Assoc. Prof.

CHALLANGES OF USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MANAGEMENT DECISION MAKING

Dr. Bozhana Stoycheva, Assist. Prof. Dr. Pavel Vitliemov, Assoc. Prof.

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ERASMUS+ MOBILITY IN BUSINESS EDUCATION: AN EXAMINATION OF A SUCCESSFUL BULGARIAN-MEXICAN COLLABORATION

Dr. Lyudmila Mihaylova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Emil Papazov, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Diana E. Woolfolk Ruiz

Книжка 3
ИГРОВИ ПОДХОДИ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО: УНИВЕРСИТЕТСКИ КОНТЕКСТ

Проф. д.н. Цветан Давидков Силвия Тонева, докторант

Книжка 2
FORMATION OF PROFESSIONAL SKILLS OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERS DURING LABORATORY PRACTICE WHEN STUDYING FUNDAMENTAL SCIENCE

Dr. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Oksana Bulgakova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Oksana Zakhutska, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Maria Bondar, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lesia Zbaravska, Assoc. Prof.

ИМИДЖ НА УНИВЕРСИТЕТА

Проф. д.п.н. Галя Христозова

Книжка 1s
COMPETITIVENESS AS A RESULT OF CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION

Dr. Nikolay Krushkov, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ralitza Zayakova-Krushkova

INNOVATION, TECHNICAL PROGRESS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Dr. Aleksandar Aleksandrov, Assist. Prof.

ENHANCING ECONOMIC SECURITY THROUGH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Dr. Dimiter Gantchev, Assist. Prof.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND SECURITY IN THE INTEGRATED CIRCUITS INDUSTRY

Dr. Ivan Nachev, Dr. Yuliana Tomova, Iskren Konstantinov, PhD student, Marina Spasova, student

GREEN TRADEMARKS AND SUSTAINABILITY

Dr. Silviya Todorova, Assist. Prof.

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ITS PROTECTION AS AN INVENTION

Dr. Vladislava Pаcheva, Assist. Prof.

Книжка 1
PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Prof. Dr. Milena Filipova Prof. Dr. Olha Prokopenko Prof. Dr. Igor Matyushenko, Dr. Olena Khanova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Olga Shirobokova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ardian Durmishi

RESEARCH OF USING THE SYSTEM APPROACH TO INCREASE PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE OF STUDENTS IN THE PROCESS OF STUDYING NATURAL SCIENCES

Dr. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Іnna Savytska, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Oksana Bulgakova, Assoc. Prof. Prof. Iryna Yasinetska, Dr. Lesia Zbaravska, Assoc. Prof.

2023 година
Книжка 6s
TRANSFORMING MARITIME EDUCATION FOR A DIGITAL INDUSTRY

Dr. Christiana Atanasova, Assist. Prof.

DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMON INFORMATION SYSTEM TO CREATE A DIGITAL CAREER CENTER TOGETHER WITH PARTNER HIGHER SCHOOLS

Prof. Dr. Yordanka Angelova, Dr. Rossen Radonov, Assoc. Prof. Vasil Kuzmov, Assist. Prof. Stela Zhorzh Derelieva-Konstantinova

DRAFTING A DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION STRATEGY FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT SECTOR – EMPIRICAL STUDY ON UAE

Mounir el Khatib, Shikha al Ali, Ibrahim Alharam, Ali Alhajeri Dr. Gabriela Peneva, Assist. Prof., Prof. Jordanka Angelova, Mahmoud Shanaa

VOYAGE OF LEARNING: CRUISE SHIPS WEATHER ROUTING AND MARITIME EDUCATION

Prof. Svetlana Dimitrakieva, Dr. Dobrin Milev, Assist. Prof., Dr. Christiana Atanasova, Assist. Prof.

RESEARCH ON THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT COMPETENCES OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN PRACTICE

Land. arch. Elena Dragozova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Stanislava Kovacheva, Assoc. Prof.

STUDY OF THE KEY FACTORS INFLUENCING THE EFFECTIVE PLANNING AND UTILIZATION OF PRODUCTION FACILITIES IN THE INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISE

Dr. Tanya Panayotova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Krasimira Dimitrova, Assoc. Prof., Neli Veleva, PhD student

SIMULATOR TRAINING – UNIQUE POWERFUL INSTRUMENT FOR EDUCATING, SKILLS CREATING, MITIGATING SKILLS AND RESILIENCE CREATING

Prof. Dimitar Dimitrakiev, Vencislav Stankov, Assist. Prof., Dr. Christiana Atanasova, Assist. Prof.

СТРУКТУРНИ ПРОМЕНИ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО НА МЕНИДЖЪРИ ЗА ИНДУСТРИЯ 5.0

Доц. д-р Недко Минчев, доц. д-р Венета Христова, гл. ас. д-р Иван Стоянов

RESEARCH OF THE INNOVATION CAPACITY OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS

Dr. Siya Veleva, Assoc. Prof.; Prof. Dr. Eng. Margarita Mondeshka Dr. Anka Tsvetanova, Assoc. Prof.,

Книжка 6
Книжка 5s
ПРЕСЕЧНАТА ТОЧКА НА СПОРТА, СИГУРНОСТТА И КРИПТО ФЕН ТОКЕНИТЕ

Полк. доц. Георги Маринов Доц. Милена Кулева

ВИДОВЕ ТРАВМИ В ПАРАШУТИЗМА И ПРЕВЕНЦИЯТА ИМ

Капитан III ранг Георги Калинов

ОБУЧЕНИЕ В ХОДЕНЕ С ПОМОЩНИ СРЕДСТВА – РИСКОВЕ И СИГУРНОСТ ЗА ПАЦИЕНТА

Атанас Друмев Доц. д-р Данелина Вачева, доц. д-р Искра Петкова

Книжка 5
ПОДХОДИ ЗА ПСИХОСОЦИАЛНА ПОДКРЕПА НА УНИВЕРСИТЕТСКИ ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛИ В УСЛОВИЯ НА КРИЗА

Доц. д.н. Цветелина Търпоманова, доц. д.н. Веселина Славова

Книжка 4s
DETERMINING THE DEGREE OF DIGITALIZATION OF A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION

Acad. DSc. Hristo Beloev, Prof. Dr. Angel Smrikarov, Assoc. Prof. DSc. Valentina Voinohovska, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Galina Ivanova

A STUDY ON THE POSSIBILITIES TO INTEGRATE THE MODERN 3D TECHNOLOGIES IN THE SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

Prof. Dr. Georgi Hristov, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Plamen Zahariev, Assist. Prof. Dr. Diyana Kinaneva, Assist. Prof. Georgi Georgiev

THE ROLE OF THE UNIVERSITIES AS ACCELERATORS FOR THE INTEGRATION OF THE STEM LEARNING METHODS IN THE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS

Prof. Dr. Georgi Hristov, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Plamen Zahariev, Assist. Prof. Georgi Georgiev

ОТ STEM КЪМ BEST: ДВА СТАНДАРТА, ЕДНА ЦЕЛ

Проф. д-р Андрей Захариев, проф. д-р Стефан Симеонов, гл. ас. д-р Таня Тодорова

ВЪЗМОЖНОСТИ ЗА ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА БЛОКЧЕЙН ТЕХНОЛОГИЯТА В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Докторант Андриан Минчев, доц. д-р Ваня Стойкова

ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВА НА ДИГИТАЛНАТА ТРАНСФОРМАЦИЯ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО – СРАВНИТЕЛЕН АНАЛИЗ НА СТУДЕНТСКОТО МНЕНИЕ

Гл. ас. д-р Мирослава Бонева, доц. д-р Антон Недялков, проф. д.н. Милена Кирова

CHALLENGES, REQUIREMENTS, OPPORTUNITIES AND SOLUTIONS FOR THE DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE TRANSPORT EDUCATION

Prof. Dr. Georgi Hristov, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Plamen Zahariev

Книжка 4
EFFECT OF RESILIENCE ON BURNOUT IN ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

Dr. Radina Stoyanova, Prof. Sonya Karabeliova, Petya Pandurova, Dr. Nadezhda Zheckova Dr. Kaloyan Mitev

STATE AND PROSPECTS OF DEVELOPMENT OF ACADEMIC MOBILITY IN THE SYSTEM OF TRAINING A SPECIAL EDUCATION SPECIALIST

Dr. Tetiana Dokuchyna, Assoc. Prof., Prof. Dr. Svitlana Myronova, Dr. Tetiana Franchuk, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 3s
STRATEGIES AND POLICIES TO SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT OF AI TECHNOLOGIES IN EUROPE

Assoc. Prof. Miglena Molhova, Assoc. Prof. Petya Biolcheva

BULGARIA'S TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH THE PRISM OF HIGHER EDUCATION POLICIES

Assoc. Prof. Ivaylo B. Ivanov, Assoc. Prof. Miglena Molhova

INTELLIGENT ANIMAL HUSBANDRY: FARMER ATTITUDES AND A ROADMAP FOR IMPLEMENTATION

Prof. Dr. Dimitrios Petropoulos, Koutroubis Fotios Assoc. Prof. Petya Biolcheva Evgeni Valchev

EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES IN TOURISM THROUGH MOTIVATION

Assoc. Prof. Fahri Idriz Assoc. Prof. Marin Geshkov

Книжка 3
САМООЦЕНКА НА ОБЩООБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИТЕ И РЕСУРСНИТЕ УЧИТЕЛИ ЗА РАБОТА В ПАРАДИГМАТА НА ПРИОБЩАВАЩОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Проф. д.н. Милен Замфиров, проф. Емилия Евгениева, проф. Маргарита Бакрачева

STUDY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE USE OF COMMUNICATIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS OF ENGINEERS TRAINING

Assoc. Prof. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof. Valentina Vasileva Assoc. Prof. Sergii Bilan, Assoc. Prof. Maria Bondar, Assoc. Prof. Oksana Bulgakova, Assoc. Prof. Lyubov Shymko

SAFETY THROUGH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE MARITIME INDUSTRY

Assoc. Prof. Petya Biolcheva Evgeni Valchev, PhD student

Книжка 2
РАЗПОЛОЖЕНИЕ НА ВИСШИТЕ УЧИЛИЩА В БЪЛГАРИЯ В КОНТЕКСТА НА ФОРМИРАНЕ НА ПАЗАРА НА ТРУДА

Гл. ас. д-р Цветелина Берберова-Вълчева, доц. д-р Камен Петров, доц. д-р Николай Цонков

CHARACTERISTICS AND COMPONENTS OF THE CYBER HYGIENE AS A SUBCLASS OF CYBER SECURITY IN MILITARY ENVIRONMENT AND EDUCATIONAL ISSUES

Prof. Boyan Mednikarov, DSc. Prof. Yuliyan Tsonev Dr. Borislav Nikolov, Prof. Andon Lazarov, DSc.

Книжка 1
MODERNIZATION OF THE CONTENT OF THE LECTURE COURSE IN PHYSICS FOR TRAINING FUTURE AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERS

Dr. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Valentina Vasileva, Assoc. Prof. Prof. Vasyl Shynkaruk, DSc., Assoc. Prof. Oksana Bulgakova, Assoc. Prof. Maria Bondar Assoc. Prof. Lesia Zbaravska, Assoc. Prof. Sergii Slobodian

THE NEW PANDEMIC NORMAL THROUGH THE EYES OF BULGARIAN STUDENTS

Prof. Vyara Stoilova, Assoc. Prof. Todorka Kineva

2022 година
Книжка 6
ORGANIZATION OF AN INCLUSIVE EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT FOR THE STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS

Prof. Halyna Bilavych Prof. Nataliia Bakhmat Prof. Tetyana Pantiuk, Prof. Mykola Pantiuk Prof. Borys Savchuk

ДИГИТАЛИЗАЦИЯ НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО В БЪЛГАРИЯ: СЪСТОЯНИЕ И ОБЩИ ТЕНДЕНЦИИ

Д-р Теодора Върбанова, проф. д-р Албена Вуцова, доц. д-р Николай Нетов

СКРИНИНГ НА ЗРЕНИЕТО – ПРОФИЛАКТИКА И ЕЛЕМЕНТ ОТ ПРАКТИКАТА НА СТУДЕНТИ И ОБУЧЕНИЕТО НА УЧЕНИЦИ

Руска Драганова-Христова, д-р Славена Стойкова, доц. д-р Снежана Йорданова

Книжка 5
ПРАВОТО НА ИЗБОР В ЖИВОТА НА ДЕЦАТА В РЕПУБЛИКА БЪЛГАРИЯ

Проф. д.п.н. Сийка Чавдарова-Костова, гл. ас. д-р Даниела Рачева, ас. Екатерина Томова, доц. д-р Росица Симеонова

SUSTAINABLE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH COACHING: BENEFITS FOR TEACHERS AND LEARNERS

Assoc. Prof. Irina Ivanova, Assoc. Prof. Penka Kozhuharova, Prof. Rumyana Todorova

SELF-ASSESSMENT – A COMPONENT OF THE COMPETENCE-BASED TRAINING IN THE PROFESSION “APPLIED PROGRAMMER”

Assoc. Prof. Ivaylo Staribratov, Muharem Mollov, Rosen Valchev Petar Petrov

Книжка 4
BENCHMARKING FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SPEED AND POWER CHARACTERISTICS

Assist. Prof. Dr. Darinka Ignatova Assoc. Prof. Dr. Alexander Iliev

DIAGNOSIS AS A TOOL FOR MONITORING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ADDICTION PREVENTION IN ADOLESCENTS

Prof. O.A. Selivanova Assoc. Prof. N.V. Bystrova, Assoc. Prof. I.I. Derecha, Assoc. Prof. T.S. Mamontova, Assoc. Prof. O.V. Panfilova

Книжка 3
ПУБЛИЧНОТО РАЗБИРАНЕ НА НАУКАТА В МРЕЖОВИЯ СВЯТ

Д-р Светломир Здравков, д-р Мартин Й. Иванов, д-р Петя Климентова

ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ ЗА УСТОЙЧИВО РАЗВИТИЕ – ПРАКТИКО-ПРИЛОЖНИ АСПЕКТИ

Гл. ас. д-р Златка Ваклева Проф. д-р Тоня Георгиева

Книжка 2
PREPARATION OF PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS FOR COMMUNICATIVE AND RHETORICAL ACTIVITY IN SCHOOL IN THE CONTEXT OF THEIR PRACTICAL TRAINING

Prof. Halyna Bilavych Prof. Nataliia Bakhmat Prof. Tetyana Pantyuk, Prof. Mykola Pantyuk Prof. Borys Savchuk

ПРОЛЕТНА КОНФЕРЕНЦИЯ НА СЪЮЗА НА МАТЕМАТИЦИТЕ В БЪЛГАРИЯ

(Трявна, 5 – 9 април 2022) Гл. ас. д-р Албена Симова

Книжка 1
ДИГИТАЛНАТА ИНТЕРАКЦИЯ ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛ – СТУДЕНТ В ОНЛАЙН ОБУЧЕНИЕТО В МЕДИЦИНСКИТЕ УНИВЕРСИТЕТИ

Д-р Миглена Търновска, д-р Румяна Стоянова Доц. Боряна Парашкевова, проф. Юлияна Маринова

2021 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ЕДНА РЕКАПИТУЛАЦИЯ НА ИЗСЛЕДВАНИЯ ВЪРХУ ИНТЕРКУЛТУРНИТЕ ОТНОШЕНИЯ. КАКВО СЛЕДВА ОТ ТОВА ЗА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО?

Давидков, Ц., 2019. Изследвания върху културите. Културни ориентири на управлението. София: СУ „Св. Климент Охридски“, ISBN 978-954-9399-52-3 Проф. Пламен Макариев

Книжка 4s
RECOGNITION OF FAKE NEWS IN SPORTS

Colonel Assoc. Prof. Petko Dimov

SIGNAL FOR HELP

Ina Vladova, Milena Kuleva

Книжка 4
PREMISES FOR A MULTICULTURAL APPROACH TO EDUCATION

Dr. Anzhelina Koriakina, Assoc. Prof., Prof. Lyudmila Amanbaeva, DSc.

ПОЗИТИВНА ПСИХОЛОГИЯ: ПРОБЛЕМНИ ОБЛАСТИ И ФОРМИРАНЕ НА ЛИЧНОСТТА

Доц. д-р Стоил Мавродиев, Любомира Димитрова

КНИГА ЗА ИСТОРИЯТА НА БЪЛГАРСКОТО ВИСШЕ ИНЖЕНЕРНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Сгурев, В., Гергов, С., Иванов, Г., 2019. Положителните науки с приложение към индустрията. История на висшето техническо образование в България. София: Изд. на БАН „Проф. Марин Дринов“, Изд. „Захарий Стоянов“. ISBN 978-619-245-004-5, ISBN 978-954-09-1387-2.

Книжка 3
ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND INTERDISCIPLINARY EDUCATION – SEMIOTIC ASPECTS

Prof. Dr. Christo Kaftandjiev Dr. Diana Kotova

THE PRACTICAL IMPORTANCE OF ACCOUNTING EDUCATION FOR FUTURE MANAGERS

Nataliia Radionova, DSc. Dr. Radostina Stoyanova, Assist. Prof.

ЗА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНАТА ИНТЕГРАЦИЯ И ЗАЛОЗИТЕ НА НАСТОЯЩЕТО

Нунев, Й., 2020. Мониторинг на процесите на приобщаване и образователна интеграция и модели за десегрегация на ромското образование. Пловдив: Астарта, ISBN 978-954-350-283-7

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
METHODOLOGY OF SAFETY AND QUALITY OF LIFE ON THE BASIS OF NOOSPHERIC EDUCATION SYSTEM FORMATION

Nataliia Bakhmat Nataliia Ridei, Nataliia Tytova, Vladyslava Liubarets, Oksana Katsero

ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ В УСТОЙЧИВО РАЗВИТИЕ И ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЕ „ДЕТЕ – СРЕДА“

Стоянова, М. (2020). Образование в устойчиво развитие и взаимодействие „дете – среда“ София: Авангард принт. ISBN 978-954-337-408-3

2020 година
Книжка 6
HIGHER EDUCATION AS A PUBLIC GOOD

Yulia Nedelcheva, Miroslav Nedelchev

Книжка 5
НАСЪРЧАВАНЕ НА СЪТРУДНИЧЕСТВОТО МЕЖДУ ВИСШИТЕ УЧИЛИЩА И БИЗНЕСА

Добринка Стоянова, Блага Маджурова, Гергана Димитрова, Стефан Райчев

Книжка 4
THE STRATEGY OF HUMAN RIGHTS STUDY IN EDUCATION

Anush Balian Nataliya Seysebayeva Natalia Efremova Liliia Danylchenko

Книжка 3
ПОМОЩНИ СРЕДСТВА И ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ПРИОБЩАВАЩОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Янкова, Ж. (2020). Помощни средства и технологии за деца и ученици със специални образователни потребности в приобщаващото образование.

Книжка 2
МИГРАЦИЯ И МИГРАЦИОННИ ПРОЦЕСИ

Веселина Р. Иванова

SOCIAL STATUS OF DISABLED PEOPLE IN RUSSIA

Elena G. Pankova, Tatiana V. Soloveva, Dinara A. Bistyaykina, Olga M. Lizina

Книжка 1
ETHNIC UPBRINGING AS A PART OF THE ETHNIC CULTURE

Sholpankulova Gulnar Kenesbekovna

ЗА СВЕТЛИНАТА, КОЯТО ИЗЛЪЧВА… В ПАМЕТ НА ПРОФ. Д.П.Н. АСЕМГУЛ МАЛДАЖАНОВА

Нашата редколегия загуби един все- отдаен и неповторим колега и приятел – проф. д.п.н. Асемгул Малдажанова. Пе- дагог по призвание и филолог по мисия! Отиде си от нас нашият приятел, коле- га и член на редколегията на списанието – професор д.п.н. Асемгул Малдажанова – първи заместник-ректор на Евразийския

2019 година
Книжка 6
EMOTIONAL COMPETENCE OF THE SOCIAL TEACHER

Kadisha K. Shalgynbayeva Ulbosin Zh.Tuyakova

Книжка 5
„ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИ КИНОХОРИЗОНТИ“ В ПОЛЕТО НА МЕДИА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

(2018). Образователни кинохоризонти. Международен сборник с научни публи- кации по проект „Естетически и образователни проекции на кинодидактиката“. Бургас: Проф. д-р Асен Златаров. Съставител: Маргарита Терзиева. ISBN 978-954-471-496-3

Книжка 4
ВИСШЕТО МОРСКО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ В КОНКУРЕНТНА СРЕДА

Бакалов, Я. (2019). Висше морско образование. Лидиране в конкурентна среда. Варна: Стено. ISBN 978-619-241-029-2

Книжка 3
УЧИЛИЩЕТО НА БЪДЕЩЕТО

Наталия Витанова

Книжка 2
КНИГА ЗА УСПЕШНИТЕ НАУЧНИ ПУБЛИКАЦИИ

Кожухаров, А. (2018). Успешните научни публикации. Варна: Тера Балканика. ISBN 978-619-90844-1-0

Книжка 1
POST-GRADUATE QUALIFICATION OF TEACHERS IN INTERCULTURAL EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT

Irina Koleva, Veselin Tepavicharov, Violeta Kotseva, Kremena Yordanova

ДЕЦАТА В КОНСТИТУЦИОННИТЕ НОРМИ НА БЪЛГАРИЯ

Румен Василев, Весела Марева

СЪСТОЯНИЕ НА БЪЛГАРСКОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Анелия Любенова Любомир Любенов

ИНТЕРКУЛТУРНИЯТ ТРЕНИНГ КАТО ЧАСТ ОТ СТРАТЕГИЯТА ЗА ГЛОБАЛИЗАЦИОННА ИНТЕГРАЦИЯ

Хубенова, М. (2018). Значение на междукултурната комуникация за направления: политически науки, право, икономика и бизнес. София: Издателски комплекс УНСС. ISBN 978-619-232-072-0

ЕДИН НОВ УЧЕБНИК

Дончева, Ю. (2018). Теоретични и методически основи на запознаване с околния свят в детската градина. Русе: Лени Ан

2018 година
Книжка 6
СТРАТЕГИИ НА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНАТА И НАУЧНАТА ПОЛИТИКА НАУЧНО СПИСАНИЕ STRATEGIES FOR POLICY IN SCIENCE AND EDUCATION EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL ГОДИНА XXVI / VOLUME 26, 2018 ANNUAL CONTENTS / ГОДИШНО СЪДЪРЖАНИЕ СТРАНИЦИ / PAGES КНИЖКА 1 / NUMBER 1: 1 – 120 КНИЖКА 2 / NUMBER 2: 121 – 224 КНИЖКА 3 / NUMBER 3: 225 – 336 КНИЖКА 4 / NUMBER 4: 337 – 448 КНИЖКА 5 / NUMBER 5: 449 – 560 КНИЖКА 6 / NUMBER 6: 561 – 664

ДИСКУСИОННО / DISCUSSION 211 – 216: Процедурата за назначаване на ръководител на катедра като причина за вло- шаващото се качество на обучението и микроклимата във висшите учи лища у нас [The Procedure for Appointing a Head of Department as a Reason for the Deteriorating Quality of Education and the Microclimate in the Higher School] / Александър Димит- ров / Alexander Dimitrov

Книжка 5
A NEW AWARD FOR PROFESSOR MAIRA KABAKOVA

The staff of the Editorial board of the journal “Strategies for Policy in Science and Education” warmly and sincerely congratulates their Kazakhstan colleague -

ПРОДЪЛЖАВАЩАТА КВАЛИФИКАЦИЯ НА УЧИТЕЛИТЕ – НОРМАТИВЕН И ИЗСЛЕДОВАТЕЛСКИ ОБЗОР

(научно-теоретично обобщение върху проведени обучения на учители)

ЕТНОЦЕНТРИЗМЪТ И ИНЕРЦИИТЕ ОТ МИНАЛОТО – СЕРИОЗНИ ПРОБЛЕМИ В БЪЛГАРСКАТА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА СИСТЕМА

(Eтнопедагогически аспекти на основното и средното образование) Веселин Тепавичаров

Книжка 4
ХРИСТО БОТЕВ И ПОЗНАВАТЕЛНИЯТ КРЪГОЗОР НА СЪВРЕМЕННИТЕ СТУДЕНТИ ЗА ЕВРОПА

Изследователски разказ за един познавателен подвиг и за една познавателна недостатъчност

Книжка 3
BLENDED EDUCATION IN HIGHER SCHOOLS: NEW NETWORKS AND MEDIATORS

Nikolay Tsankov Veska Gyuviyska Milena Levunlieva

ВЗАИМОВРЪЗКАТА МЕЖДУ СПОРТА И ПРАВОТО

Ивайло Прокопов, Елица Стоянова

НАДНАЦИОНАЛНИ И МЕЖДУПРАВИТЕЛСТВЕНИ МЕТОДИ НА ИНТЕГРАЦИЯ В ОБЛАСТТА НА ПРАВОСЪДИЕТО И СИГУРНОСТТА

(Формиране на обща миграционна политика: парадигми и образователни аспекти) Лора Махлелиева-Кларксън

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
ВЪЗПРИЯТИЯ И НАГЛАСИ НА УЧЕНИЦИТЕ ПО ВАЖНИ ОБЩЕСТВЕНИ ВЪПРОСИ

(Данни от Международното изследване на гражданското образование – ICCS 2016)

2017 година
Книжка 6
ЗНАЧИМОСТТА НА УЧЕНЕТО: АНАЛИЗ НА ВРЪЗКИТЕ МЕЖДУ ГЛЕДНИТЕ ТОЧКИ НА УЧЕНИЦИ, РОДИТЕЛИ И УЧИТЕЛИ

Илиана Мирчева, Елена Джамбазова, Снежана Радева, Деян Велковски

ВЪЗПРИЯТИЯ И НАГЛАСИ НА УЧЕНИЦИТЕ ПО ВАЖНИ ОБЩЕСТВЕНИ ВЪПРОСИ

(Данни от Международното изследване на гражданското образование – ICCS 2016)

СТРАТЕГИИ НА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНАТА И НАУЧНАТА ПОЛИТИКА НАУЧНО СПИСАНИЕ STRATEGIES FOR POLICY IN SCIENCE AND EDUCATION EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL ГОДИНА XXV / VOLUME 25, 2017 ANNUAL CONTENTS / ГОДИШНО СЪДЪРЖАНИЕ

СТРАНИЦИ / PAGES КНИЖКА 1 / NUMBER 1: 1 – 112 КНИЖКА 2 / NUMBER 2: 113 – 224 КНИЖКА 3 / NUMBER 3: 225 – 336 КНИЖКА 4 / NUMBER 4: 337 – 448 КНИЖКА 5 / NUMBER 5: 449 – 552 КНИЖКА 6 / NUMBER 6: 553 – 672

Книжка 5
ОРГАНИЗАЦИОННА КУЛТУРА В УЧИЛИЩЕ

Ивайло Старибратов, Лилия Бабакова

Книжка 4
КОУЧИНГ. ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЕН КОУЧИНГ

Наталия Витанова, Нели Митева

Книжка 3
ТЕХНОХУМАНИЗМЪТ И ДЕЙТЪИЗМЪТ – НОВИТЕ РЕЛИГИИ НА БЪДЕЩЕТО

Harari, Y. N. (2016). Homo Deus. A Brief History of Tomorrow. Harvill Secker. ISBN-10: 1910701874

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
РЕФОРМИТЕ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО – ПЕРСПЕКТИВИ И ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВА

Интервю с Габриела Миткова, началник на Регионалното управление на образованието – Силистра

ЕМПАТИЯ И РЕФЛЕКСИЯ

Нели Кънева, Кристиана Булдеева

2016 година
Книжка 6
СТРАТЕГИИ НА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНАТА И НАУЧНАТА ПОЛИТИКА НАУЧНО СПИСАНИЕ STRATEGIES FOR POLICY IN SCIENCE AND EDUCATION EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL ГОДИНА XXIV / VOLUME 24, 2016 ANNUAL CONTENT / ГОДИШНО СЪДЪРЖАНИЕ

СТРАНИЦИ / PAGES КНИЖКА 1 / NUMBER 1: 1 – 120 КНИЖКА 2 / NUMBER 2: 121 – 232 КНИЖКА 3 / NUMBER 3: 233 – 344 КНИЖКА 4 / NUMBER 4: 345 – 456 КНИЖКА 5 / NUMBER 5: 457 – 568 КНИЖКА 6 / NUMBER 6: 569 – 672

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2014 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
КОХЕРЕНТНОСТ НА ПОЛИТИКИ

Албена Вуцова, Лиляна Павлова

Книжка 4
ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО ПО ПРАВАТА НА ЧОВЕКА ПРЕЗ ПОГЛЕДА НА ДОЦ. ЦЕЦКА КОЛАРОВА

Цецка Коларова. (2013). Образование по правата на човека. София: Авангард Прима. ISBN 978-619-160-234-6

USING THE RESULTS OF A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT

Thomas Kellaghan Vincent Greaney T. Scott Murray Chapter 4 Translating Assessment Findings Into Policy And Action Although the primary purpose of a system of national assessment is to describe students’ learning, its role is not limited to description. To justify the effort and expenditure involved, the information that an assessment provides about the achievements of students, their strengths and weaknesses, and how they are distributed in the population (for example, by gender or location

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF UNIVERSITY FACULTY: А SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS

Gulnar Toltaevna Balakayeva Alken Shugaybekovich Tokmagambetov Sapar Imangalievich Ospanov

ЗА ПО-ХУМАНИСТИЧНА ТРАДИЦИОННО- ИНОВАЦИОННА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНО-ВЪЗПИТАТЕЛНА СТРАТЕГИЯ У НАС

(КОНЦЕПТУАЛНА РАЗРАБОТКА В ПОМОЩ НА ПОДГОТОВКАТА НА НОВ ЗАКОН ЗА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО)

Книжка 1
РЕФЛЕКСИЯТА В ИНТЕГРАТИВНОТО ПОЛЕ НА МЕТОДИКАТА НА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО ПО БИОЛОГИЯ

Иса Хаджиали, Наташа Цанова, Надежда Райчева, Снежана Томова

USING THE RESULTS OF A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT

Thomas Kellaghan Vincent Greaney T. Scott Murray Chapter 1 Factors affecting the use and nonuse of national assessment fi ndings The main objectives of a national assessment, as set out in volume 1 of this series, Assessing National Achievement Levels in Education, are to determine (a) how well students are learning in the education system (with reference to general expectations, aims of the curriculum, and preparation for further learning and for life); (b) whether there is evidence of par

2013 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
Книжка 4
QUESTIONNAIRE DEVELOPMENT

ÎÖÅÍßÂÀÍÅÒÎ

РОССИЙСКАЯ СИСТЕМА ОЦЕНКИ КАЧЕСТВА ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ: ГЛАВНЫЕ УРОКИ

В. Болотов / И. Вальдман / Г. Ковалёва / М. Пинская

Книжка 3
MASS MEDIA CULTURE IN KAZAKHSTAN

Aktolkyn Kulsariyeva Yerkin Massanov Indira Alibayeva

РОССИЙСКАЯ СИСТЕМА ОЦЕНКИ КАЧЕСТВА ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ: ГЛАВНЫЕ УРОКИ

В. Болотов / И. Вальдман / Г. Ковалёва / М. Пинская

Книжка 2
ОЦЕНЯВАНЕ НА ГРАЖДАНСКИТЕ КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТИ НА УЧЕНИЦИТЕ: ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВА И ВЪЗМОЖНОСТИ

Светла Петрова Център за контрол и оценка на качеството на училищното образование

Книжка 1
Уважаеми читатели,

вет, както и от международния борд за предоставените статии и студии, за да могат да бъдат идентифицирани в полето на образованието пред широката аудитория от педа- гогически специалисти във всички степени на образователната ни система. Благодаря за техния всеотдаен и безвъзмезден труд да създават и популяризират мрежа от научни съобщества по профила на списанието и да насърчават научните изследвания. Благодаря на рецензентите от национално представените висши училища, на- учни институции и

METHODS FOR SETTING CUT SCORES IN CRITERION – REFERENCED ACHIEVEMENT TESTS

ÎÖÅÍßÂÀÍÅÒÎ COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE QUALITY OF THE SEPARATE METHODS

ПУБЛИКАЦИИ ПРЕЗ 2012 Г.

СПИСАНИЕ „БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕЗИК И ЛИТЕРАТУРА“

2012 година
Книжка 6
DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE IN KAZAKHSTAN IN THE PERIOD OF INDEPENDENCE

Aigerim Mynbayeva Maira Kabakova Aliya Massalimova

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
СИСТЕМАТА ЗА РАЗВИТИЕ НА АКАДЕМИЧНИЯ СЪСТАВ НА РУСЕНСКИЯ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ „АНГЕЛ КЪНЧЕВ“

Христо Белоев, Ангел Смрикаров, Орлин Петров, Анелия Иванова, Галина Иванова

Книжка 2
ПРОУЧВАНЕ НА РОДИТЕЛСКОТО УЧАСТИЕ В УЧИЛИЩНИЯ ЖИВОТ В БЪЛГАРИЯ

* Този материал е изготвен въз основа на резултатите от изследването „Parental Involvement in Life of School Matters“, проведено в България в рамките на проек- та „Advancing Educational Inclusion and Quality in South East Europe“, изпълняван

ВТОРИ ФОРУМ ЗА СТРАТЕГИИ В НАУКАТА

Тошка Борисова В края на 2011 г. в София се проведе второто издание на Форум за страте- гии в науката. Основната тема бе повишаване на международната видимост и разпознаваемост на българската наука. Форумът се организира от „Elsevier“ – водеща компания за разработване и предоставяне на научни, технически и медицински информационни продукти и услуги , с подкрепата на Министер- ството на образованието, младежта и науката. След успеха на първото издание на Форума за стратегии в науката през

Книжка 1
РЕЙТИНГИ, ИНДЕКСИ, ПАРИ

Боян Захариев