Стратегии на образователната и научната политика

2023/6s, стр. 80 - 93

STUDY OF THE KEY FACTORS INFLUENCING THE EFFECTIVE PLANNING AND UTILIZATION OF PRODUCTION FACILITIES IN THE INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISE

Резюме:

Ключови думи:

1. Introduction

The industrial sector of a country is always the subject of increased attention and interest by part of researchers and analysts, as industry stands at the foundation of any economy. In this regard, the aim is to identify and outline those factors, prerequisites and conditions that enable enterprises and companies located in limited business environment, to compete successfully as on both domestic and international markets. (Minkov et al. 2019). Understanding, effectively planning and managing production capacity allows any organization to assess its future financial performance and create a reliable schedule for delivering products to its customers. The choice of an approach to the improvement and development of the production capacity is of utmost importance for the effective functioning of the entire production system of the industrial company. The study of the factors affecting the effective planning and management of production capacity is part of a unified strategy for the development of the entire enterprise. Changes in resource flexibility and resource location should be assessed against the spare capacity resulting from these changes. and a number of factors that increase or decrease the company’s risks. These factors that affect production capacity are related to such a level that a change in one factor potentially affects others. No system can operate at full capacity for a long period of time. Inefficiencies and delays make it impossible to achieve the maximum theoretical production level in the long run. Without planning the use and increasing the production capacity of the enterprise, all business achievements of the production complex will be short-term. Capacity planning requires management to identify, analyze and monitor the key factors affecting organizational performance. (Dimitrova, Panayotova, Veleva 2021). Competencies in the field of teamwork, leadership and management play an important role in making management decisions. It is for professionals of all qualification levels to demonstrate a socially responsible attitude and ethics of the profession and the organization. (Dragozova-Ivanova 2015).

The main objective set in this scientific research is to investigate the key factors in the process of planning and managing the production capacity of the industrial enterprise.

Main tasks to achieve the set objective:

1. Determining the constraints and factors in making decisions relating to production capacity;

2. Determining the relationships between the key factors most influencing the functioning and management of production capacity in industrial enterprises.

3. Determining the significance (priority) of the determined factors.

Subject of research: the interrelationships and conditioning between the various factors that contribute to the construction and operation of the concept of optimal planning and management of production facilities.

Object of research is the production system of the industrial enterprise.

This publication presents a generalized research model of the key factors influencing the effective planning and utilization of production facilities in the industrial enterprise, based on the results of a previous study. The model includes two stages developed in the following technological sequence:

First stage

This stage performs the following tasks:

1. Identification of key factors affecting effective planning and management of production capacity.

2. Study of the relationship between the identified key factors and capacity management, based on the Interpretive structural modeling (ISM) method and organizational coordination model in parallel engineering;

3. Analysis of the relationships between the studied key factors using the Structural Self-Interaction Matrix (SSIM) and their classification into 4 main categories: independent, dependent, interdependent, governing;

4. Development of a structural model of the interaction of these key factors.

The model is based on ISM (interpretive structural modeling), considered in the scientific research of many authors. (Attri, Dev, Sharma 2013), (Bartels, Peters, Pruyn, van der Molen 2010), (Behl, Pal 2020). ISM is a method to identify inter relationship among various factors.

The analysis of the results of the completed survey of practices in 10 real machine-building enterprises led to the identification of 18 factors influencing the processes related to the effective planning and management of production capacity.

Factors playing a key role in the planning and management of production capacity:

F1 – Commitment of top management

F2 – Corporate and production strategy

F3 – Resource planning

F4 – Planning and effective management of production capacity

F5 – Level of production organization

F6 – Mechanization and automation of production

F7 – Degree of efficiency of use of production equipment

F8 – Planning and implementation of maintenance and maintenance of production equipment

F9 – Structure and functions of the management system

F10 – Degree of use of information technologies and software products in the horizontal and vertical communication in the organization

F11 – Effective communication and coordination between the units in the organization

F12 – Rational use of resources

F13 – Workforce qualification management

F14 – Employee commitment to the goals of the organization

F15 – Organizational culture

F16 – Analysis of the results of management decisions, risks, benefits and feedback

F17 – Flexibility and timely response in case of a problem

F18 – Using management methods and techniques to deal with current problems and their consequences

The classification of the key factors influencing the effective planning and management of the production capacity is based on the study of the driving force and the dependence of each of the key factors.

The factors presented above, influencing the production capacity and the calculated values of the driving force and the dependence of each of them, help to classify them into 4 main groups: independent, dependent, interdependent and driving (Fig. 1). Emphasis is placed on the performance that can be achieved within the existing constraints of system operation.

Figure 1. Diagram of the dependencies of the key factors. Source: (Dimitrova, Panayotova, Veleva 2021)

The diagram of the dependences of the key factors divides the factors into four categories such as: independent, dependent, interdependent and driving, due to which the analysis of the factors becomes easier.

– The independent factors do not influence the other studied factors. There is no single factor that has a strong driving force as well as a strong dependence. Thus, it can be concluded that among all the 18 factors selected in this study, none is unstable. There is not a single factor that stands out with both a weak driving force and low dependence. This proves that the surveyed factors play a crucial role in the effective management and planning of production capacity and justifies the need to examine the relationships between the factors that have been previously identified (Dimitrova, Panayotova, Veleva 2021).

– The dependency chart presents key factors such as senior management engagement, corporate and production strategy, resource planning and the structure and functions of the management system at the top left of the model, characterized by a strong driving force. It is on these driving factors that production managers need to pay special attention, because they are the main drivers for achieving effective planning and management of the production capacity of the industrial enterprise. Factors such as: mechanization and automation of production, degree of efficiency and use of production equipment, planning and implementation of prevention and maintenance of production equipment, rational use of resources, employee commitment to the goals of the organization and flexibility and timely response. These are the dependent factors that production managers need to pay close attention to. These factors are complex, and this necessitates a more careful analysis to determine and manage their significance for the manufacturing plant (Dimitrova, Panayotova, Veleva 2021).

– Defined as interdependent factors: planning and effective management of production capacity, level of production organization, effective communication and coordination between units in the organization, organizational culture, analysis of the results of management decisions, risks, benefits and feedback, and use of management methods and techniques for dealing with current problems and their consequences are unstable due to the fact that any change that has occurred in them will have an effect on others, as well as feedback for themselves. These factors are complex, which makes it necessary for the production managers to analyze and apply them more carefully and thoroughly (Dimitrova, Panayotova, Veleva 2021).

– The driving factors with a strong driving force, but weak dependence are those that have a strategic role in the organization, development and improvement of production management of the industrial enterprise (Dimitrova, Panayotova, Veleva 2021).

Developed in the present paper, through the use of ISM, is a model of the relationships and interrelationships between different key factors. The modelling of the structural equation, also known as the linear approach to structural connection, can be applied to test the validity of such a hypothetical model and is the subject of future research.

After classifying the considered key factors into 4 main groups of categories, the research proceeds to the next second stage.

Second stage

The object of analysis and research in the second stage are the factors falling into the two groups of interdependent and dependent. The aim is to explore and analyze their interrelationships in the following sequence:

1. Determining the relationships between the key factors most influencing the functioning and management of production capacity in industrial enterprises.

2. Determining the significance (priority) of the factors determined during the first stage of the research as interdependent and dependent factors.

3. Determination of the weighted overall priority of interdependent and dependent factors.

Factors have different importance and weight when making managerial decisions related to the efficient use of production capacity. Determining the relative importance of factors from the two groups begins with an assessment of their priority by applying the AHP method (Analytic Hierarchy Process). In the literature, there is almost no information about the application of the AHP method in production management, and this determined the choice of the team to accept the challenge and experiment with the application of the method for planning and effective management of production capacity (Saaty 1980; Forman, Saul 2001; Saaty, Peniwati 2008).

2. Determining the relationship and conditionality between the various factors that contribute to the construction and operation of a concept for maximum good planning and management of production facilities

The AHP method is a structured technique for organizing and analyzing complex solutions. It was developed by Thomas L. Saati in the 1970s. (Saaty 1980). It represents an accurate approach for quantifying the weight of criteria for managerial decision-making.

In the analysis of the interdependent and dependent factors affecting the decisions on the planning and use of the production capacity of industrial enterprises in order to increase its efficient and flexible use, the initial matrix is obtained from the information obtained from a survey of experts by comparing pairs of factors using a scale for determining the importance (priority) of factors in pairs from 1 to 9 (Panayotova 2004).

To obtain the required weights, all factors from the analyzed interdependent and dependent key factors are compared in pairs. The results of these pairwise comparisons form a matrix. In the AHP method, the task is reduced to a task of finding the weights of the elements (key factors) at each level with respect to each element of the higher level.

Factors are compared in pairs in terms of their importance for efficient planning and utilization of production capacity. Comparison expresses the relative importance (priority) of one factor over another.

Level 1

Determining the importance (priority) of interdependent factors (Table 2 and Table 3)

Table 1. Determining the significance (priority) of interdependent factors by pairs

Interdependent factorsF4F5F11F15F16F18F4125343F51/213254F111/51/31243F151/31/21/2134F161/41/51/41/314F181/31/41/31/41/41

Table 2. Determining the significance (priority) of interdependent factors by pairs – converted data

Interdependent factorsF4F5F11F15F16F18F4125343F50,500013254F110,20000,33331243F150,33330,50000,5000134F160,25000,20000,25000,333314F180,33330,25000,33330,25000,250012,61674,283310,08338,583317,250019,0000

Level 2

Normalization of the importance (priority) of interdependent factors

By dividing the values in the individual cells of the matrix, their normalized values are obtained. These values are then averaged over the rows. The obtained average values show the relative weight (significance) of each of the factors (Table 3).

Table 3. Normalized values of the significance (priority) of the interdependent factors

Interdependent factorsF4F5F11F15F16F18AverageF40,38220,46690,49590,34950,23190,15790,3474F50,19110,23350,29750,23300,28990,21050,2426F110,07640,07780,09920,23300,23190,15790,1460F150,12740,11670,04960,11650,17390,21050,1324
F160,09550,04670,02480,03880,05800,21050,0791F180,12740,05840,03310,02910,01450,05260,05251,00001,00001,00001,00001,00001,00001,0000

The analysis shows that according to the normalized values of significance (priority), the interdependent factors that are most important in the effective planning of production capacity are arranged as follows:

1. Planning and effective management of production capacity (F4).

2. The level of organization of production (F5),

3. Effective communication and coordination between units in the organization (F11)

4. Organizational culture (15)

5. Use of management methods and techniques to deal with current problems and their consequences (F16)

6. Using management methods and techniques to deal with current problems and their consequences (F18).

Level 3

In order to determine the reliability of the obtained results, it is necessary to make additional calculations.

The total weight is expressed by expressing the overall priority of the factors by multiplying the matrix of comparative values by pairs of factors by their average normalized weight.

In order to determine the reliability of the obtained results it is necessary to make additional calculations. First, the so-called “total weight” is determined, which expresses the overall priority of the criteria (factors) by multiplying the matrix of comparative values by pairs of factors by their average normalized weight. This is shown in Figure 2

.

Figure 2. Determining the “total weight” of interdependent factors

Table 4 presents the “weighted overall priority” of the interdependent factors.

Table 4. Determining the weighted overall priority of the interdependent factors

Total weightAverageWeighted overall priority2,43380,34747,00631,72460,24267,10951,03500,14607,08750,88980,13246,71810,50510,07916,38900,24690,05254,702339,0127

Verification of the reliability of the obtained results

The levels of relative importance determined by the experts participating in the study should be checked for reliability.

The degree of reliability of the significance of the compared indicators is determined as follows (1) The degree of reliability of the significance of the compared factors is determined by the reliability indicator CR.

(1)

Where:

CI is the reliability index;

RI – random variable; is determined depending on the number of compared objects n of the Table 5:

Table 5. Determining the value of the random variable RI depending on the number of compared objects (n)

n2345678910RI0,000,580,901,121,241,321,411,451,51

Source: (Stevenson J., Ozgur C, 2007)

The reliability index is determined using formula (2):

(2) Where λa – the weighted average overall priority;

Comparisons are considered valid when CR <0.10 (Hanfield, Walton, Sroufe, Melnyk, 2002).

Specific for the study:

Table 6. Determining the relative importance of interdependent factors

Weighted average overall priority λ6,5021CI0,1004RI1,24CR = CI/RI0,0810<0,10

Therefore, the results for the relative importance of the factors from the group of interdependent factors can be considered reliable.

Dependent factors

Level 1

In a similar way, the analysis of the dependent factors was performed by applying the AHP method.

The determination of the importance (priority) of the dependent factors is presented with the help of Table 7 and Table 8.

Table 7. Determining the significance (priority) of dependent factors by pairs

Dependent factorsF6F7F8F12F14F17F6123234F71/213432F81/31/31334F121/21/41/3133F141/31/31/31/314F171/41/21/41/31/412,91674,41677,916710,666713,250018,0000

Table 8. Determining the significance (priority) of dependent factors by pairs – converted data

Dependent factorsF6F7F8F12F14F17F6123234F70,500013432F80,33330,33331334
F120,50000,25000,3333133F140,33330,33330,33330,333314F170,25000,50000,25000,33330,250012,91674,41677,916710,666713,250018,0000

By dividing the values in the individual cells of the matrix, their normalized values are obtained. These values are then averaged over the rows. The obtained average values show the relative weight (significance) of each of the factors (Table 9).

Table 9. Normalized values of the significance (priority) of the dependent factors

Dependent factorsF6F7F8F12F14F17AverageF60,34290,45280,37890,18750,22640,22220,3018F70,17140,22640,37890,37500,22640,11110,2482F80,11430,07550,12630,28130,22640,22220,1743F120,17140,05660,04210,09380,22640,16670,1262F140,11430,07550,04210,03130,07550,22220,0935F170,08570,11320,03160,03130,01890,05560,05601,00001,00001,00001,00001,00001,00001,0000

It is noteworthy that the weights of the dependent factors are relatively close and with little difference between them. The highest value obtained for Mechanization and Automation of Production (F6) is 0.3018, and the lowest value – 0.0560 receives Flexibility and timely response in case of a problem (F17).

In order to determine the reliability of the obtained results, it is necessary to make additional calculations.

The total weight is expressed by expressing the overall priority of the factors by multiplying the matrix of comparative values by pairs of factors by their average normalized weight.

In order to determine the reliability of the obtained results it is necessary to make additional calculations. First, the so-called “total weight” is determined, which expresses the overall priority of the criteria (factors) by multiplying the matrix of comparative values by pairs of criteria (factors) by their average normalized weight. This is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3. Determining the “total weight” of dependent factors

Table 10 presents the definition of the “weighted overall priority” of the interdependent factors.

Table 10. Determining the weighted overall priority of the dependent factors

Total weightAverageWeighted overall priority2,07810,30186,88571,81920,24827,32901,24070,17437,11690,84570,12626,70340,60110,09356,43090,28200,05605,032239,4982

Verification of the reliability of the obtained results Specific for the study:

Table 11. Determining the relative importance of dependent factors

Weighted average overall priority6,5830CI0,1166RI1,24CR = CI/RI0,0940< 0,10

Therefore, the results for the relative importance of the factors from the group of dependent factors are reliable.

3. Conclusion

Production capacity is a key complex economic parameter of the enterprise and its effective planning and management is the basis of success and competitiveness of any production organization.

Therefore, for the planning and effective management of production capacity, it is necessary to study and analyze the relationships between the key factors influencing production capacity, their importance and priority.

In the presented study by applying the method AHP (Analytical hierarchical process), the interdependent and dependent factors identified in a previous study that affect the production capacity of enterprises are analyzed.

In this way, an attempt was made to contribute to the construction and operation of a concept for maximum good planning and management of production facilities of industrial enterprises.

In the present study, a generalized research model of the key factors influencing the effective planning and use of production facilities in the industrial enterprise is presented, for which a software product can be developed. The model is suitable for developing a software product according to the proposed algorithm, with the help of which management decisions related to production capacity can be made quickly and adequately.

Work on expanding the scope of scientific research continues. The positive results achieved give reason to deploy it to a wider scale in search of effective practical application in different types and sizes of production enterprises.

REFERENCES

ATTRI, R.; DEV, N.; SHARMA, V., 2013. Interpretative Structural Modelling (ISM) approach: An Overview. Res. J. Management Sci. ISSN 2319-1171. DOI:10.4018/978-1-7998-2216-5.ch001.

BARTELS, J.; PETERS, O.; DE JONG, M.; PRUYN, A. AND VAN DER MOLEN, M., 2010., Horizontal and vertical communication as determinants of professional and organisational identification. Personnel Review, vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 210 – 226. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481011017426.

BEHL, A.; PAL, AB., 2020. Interpretative Structural Modeling: Background, concepts, and application. India. DOI: 10.4018/978-17998-2216-5.ch001.

DIMITROVA, K., PANAYOTOVA, T., VELEVA, N., 2021. Model for research the factors influencing the effective planning and management of production capacity. Annual Journal of Technical University of Varna, vol. V, no 1, pp. 65 – 75.

DRAGOZOVA-IVANOVA, E., 2015. Professional social responsibility of management in the cities’ green systems. Burgas Free University Annual, vol. 32, pp. 185 – 193. http://research.bfu.bg:8080/ jspui/ handle/123456789/639.

FORMAN, E. H.; SAUL I. G., 2001. The analytical hierarchy process – an exposition. Operations Research, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 469 – 487. doi:10.1287/opre.49.4.469.11231.

HANDFIELD, R., WALTON, S. V., SROUFE, R. & MELNYK, STEVEN A., 2002. Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 141, no. 1, pp. 70 – 87.

MINKOV, I., IVANOV, ., MIKHALOVA, M., KURSHUMOV, V., PAVLOVA, D., 2019. Perspektivi i vŭzmozhnosti pred industrialnite predpriyatiya v Bŭlgariya. Varna: Nauka i ikonomika.

SAATY, T.L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, NY.

SAATY, T. L.; PENIWATI, K., 2008. Group Decision Making: Drawing out and Reconciling Dierences. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: RWS Publications. ISBN 978-1-888603-08-8.

PANAYOTOVA, T.; DIMITROVA, K., 2019. A Strategic Vision for Development of Flexible Industrial Enterprise. DAAAM International Scientific Book 2019, book-chapter DOI: 10.2507/daaam. scibook.2019.11Part of ISBN: 9783902734242 Part of ISSN: 1726-9687.

PANAYOTOVA T., 2004. Organizational Connections Modeling in Complex Reengineering Projects. Dissertation thesis. Varna.

STEVENSON J., OZGUR C., 2007. Introduction to Management Science with Spreadsheets. Irwin/McGraw-Hill series in operations and decision sciences. Publisher: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2007; 0073252905, 9780073252902.

2025 година
Книжка 4
ТРАНСФОРМАЦИИ НА ПАЗАРА НА ТРУДА И НУЖДАТА ОТ ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИ РЕФОРМИ

Ваня Иванова, Андрей Василев, Калоян Ганев, Ралица Симеонова-Ганева

Книжка 3
FORMING ENTREPRENEURIAL CULTURE THROUGH EDUCATION

Prof. Dr. Milena Filipova, Adriana Atanasova, PhD student

Книжка 2s
THE STATE OF INCLUSION IN ADAPTED BASKETBALL

Dr. Stefka Djobova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Ivelina Kirilova, Assist. Prof.

THE IMPACT OF AGE ON ADULT’S PARTICIPATION IN PHYSICAL ACTIVITIES DURING LEISURE TIME

Dr. Despina Sivevska, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Biljana Popeska, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 2
MODEL OF PROFESSIONALLY DIRECTED TRAINING OF FUTURE ENGINEER-TEACHERS

Prof. Ivan Beloev, Dr. Valentina Vasileva, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Іnna Savytska, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Oksana Bulgakova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lesia Zbaravska, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Olha Chaikovska, Assoc. Prof.

QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN BULGARIA: COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY TRAINING

Prof. Rositsa Doneva, Dr. Silvia Gaftandzhieva, Assoc. Prof.

ВЛИЯНИЕ НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО И ЧОВЕШКИЯ КАПИТАЛ ВЪРХУ ФОРМАЛНАТА И НЕФОРМАЛНАТА ИКОНОМИКА

Проф. д-р Стефан Петранов, доц. д-р Стела Ралева, доц. д-р Димитър Златинов

DETERMINANTS AFFECTING ACADEMIC STAFF SATISFACTION WITH ONLINE LEARNING IN HIGHER MEDICAL EDUCATION

Dr. Miglena Tarnovska, Assoc.Prof.; Dr. Rumyana Stoyanova, Assoc.Prof.; Dr. Angelina Kirkova-Bogdanova; Prof. Rositsa Dimova

Книжка 1s
CHALLENGES FACED BY THE BULGARIAN UNIVERSITIES IN THE CONTEXT OF SCIENCE – INDUSTRY RELATIONS

Dr. Svetla Boneva, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Nikolay Krushkov, Assoc. Prof.

INVENTING THE FUTURE: CAN BULGARIAN UNIVERSITIES FULFILL THEIR MISSION AS CATALYSTS FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH AND SUSTAINABILITY?

Dr. Ralitsa Zayakova-Krushkova, Assist. Prof., Dr. Alexander Mitov, Assoc. Prof.

AN INNOVATIVE MODEL FOR DEVELOPING DIGITAL COMPETENCES OF SOCIAL WORKERS

Prof Dr. Lyudmila Vekova, Dr. Tanya Vazova, Chief Assist. Prof., Dr. Penyo Georgiev, Chief Assist. Prof., Dr. Ekaterina Uzhikanova-Kovacheva

BUSINESS ASPECTS OF ACADEMIC PUBLISHING

Dr. Polina Stoyanova, Chief Assist. Prof.

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF MUSIC STREAMING

Dr. Dimiter Gantchev, Assist. Prof.

FILM INCENTIVE SCHEME IN THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA

Dr. Ivan Nachev, Assist. Prof.

PATENT PROTECTION OF DIGITAL TWINS

Dr. Vladislava Pаcheva, Chief Assist. Prof.

Книжка 1

МНОГОСТРАНЕН ПОДХОД ЗА ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ РАВНИЩЕТО НА ДИГИТАЛИЗАЦИЯ В ПОДГОТОВКАТА НА БЪДЕЩИ УЧИТЕЛИ

Доц. д-р Бистра Мизова, проф. д-р Румяна Пейчева-Форсайт Проф. д-р Харви Мелър

2024 година
Книжка 6s
DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES RISK MANAGEMENT

Dr. Miglena Molhova-Vladova, Dr. Ivaylo B. Ivanov

THE DUAL IMPACT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: CATALYST FOR INNOVATION OR THREAT TO STABILITY

Prof. Diana Antonova, Dr. Silvia Beloeva, Assist. Prof., Ana Todorova, PhD student

MARKETING IN TOURISM: PRACTICAL EVIDENCES

Dr. Fahri Idriz, Assoc. Prof.

DEVELOPMENT OF THE INFORMATION ECONOMY CONCEPT AND THE TRANSITION TO INDUSTRY 5.0

Dr. Dora Doncheva, Assist. Prof., Dr. Dimitrina Stoyancheva, Assoc. Prof.

THE GLOBAL MARKET AS A PROJECTION OF THE INFORMATION ECONOMY

Dr. Vanya Hadzhieva, Assist. Prof. Dr. Dora Doncheva, Assist. Prof.

ACADEMIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP: PRACTICAL RESULTS AND TRAINING

Prof. Nikolay Sterev, DSc., Dr. Daniel Yordanov, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 6
AN INTEGRATIVE APPROACH TO ORGANIZING THE FORMATION OF STUDENTS’ COGNITIVE INDEPENDENCE IN CONDITIONS OF INTENSIFICATION OF LEARNING ACTIVITIES

Dr. Albina Volkotrubova, Assoc. Prof. Aidai Kasymova Prof. Zoriana Hbur, DSc. Assoc. Prof. Antonina Kichuk, DSc. Dr. Svitlana Koshova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Svitlana Khodakivska, Assoc. Prof.

ИНОВАТИВЕН МОДЕЛ НА ПРОЕКТНО БАЗИРАНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ НА ГИМНАЗИАЛНИ УЧИТЕЛИ: ДОБРА ПРАКТИКА ОТ УниБИТ

Проф. д-р Жоржета Назърска, доц. д-р Александър Каракачанов, проф. д-р Магдалена Гарванова, доц. д-р Нина Дебрюне

Книжка 5s
КОНЦЕПТУАЛНА РАМКА ЗА ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА ИЗКУСТВЕНИЯ ИНТЕЛЕКТ ВЪВ ВИСШЕТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Акад. д.н. Христо Белоев, проф. д.н. Валентина Войноховска, проф. д-р Ангел Смрикаров

ИЗКУСТВЕНИЯТ ИНТЕЛЕКТ В БИЗНЕСА – ФИНАНСОВИ, ИКОНОМИЧЕСКИ И МАРКЕТИНГОВИ АСПЕКТИ

Проф. д-р Андрей Захариев, доц. д-р Драгомир Илиев Гл. ас. д-р Даниела Илиева

RECENT TRENDS AND APPLICATIONS OF THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE EDUCATION

Prof. Dr. Plamen Zahariev, Prof. Dr. Georgi Hristov, Prof. Dr. Ivan Beloev

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF UTILIZING POPULAR INTELLIGENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS IN EDUCATION

Dr. Galina Ivanova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Aleksandar Ivanov, Assoc. Prof.

CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF TRAINING IN REMOTE VIRTUAL SUPERVISION IN SOCIAL WORK

Dr. Silviya Beloeva, Assist. Prof. Dr. Nataliya Venelinova, Assist. Prof.

ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ ПРИЛОЖИМОСТТА НА БЛОКОВИ ВЕРИГИ ОТ ПЪРВО НИВО (L1) В СИСТЕМА ЗА ЕЛЕКТРОННО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Андриан Минчев, проф. Ваня Стойкова, гл. ас. д-р Галя Шивачева Доц д-р Анелия Иванова

DIGITAL DISCRIMINATION RISKS IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION

Dr. Silviya Beloeva, Assist. Prof. Dr. Nataliya Venelinova, Assist. Prof.

OPPORTUNITIES, CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS FOR DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESSES THROUGH 3D TECHNOLOGIES

Prof. Georgi Hristov, Prof. Plamen Zahariev, Dr. Diyana Kinaneva, Assist. Prof., Georgi Georgiev, Assist. Prof.

ДИГИТАЛНОТО ПОКОЛЕНИЕ VS. СЛЯТОТО, ПОЛУСЛЯТОТО И РАЗДЕЛНОТО ПИСАНЕ

Доц. д-р Владислав Маринов, ас. Анита Тодоранова

OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES FOR THE EDUCATION OF STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS IN THE DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT: THE NEW NORMAL

Prof. Julia Doncheva, DSc., Dr. Galina Ivanova, Assoc. Prof. Dilshod Tojievich Oblokulov

ИЗГРАЖДАНЕ НА КОМПЕТЕНЦИИ ЗА РАЗРАБОТВАНЕ НА STEM ОБУЧИТЕЛНИ РЕСУРСИ У БЪДЕЩИ УЧИТЕЛИ ПО ПРИРОДНИ НАУКИ

Доц. д-р Евгения Горанова, проф. д.н. Валентина Войноховска, проф. д-р Ангел Смрикаров

APPLICATION OF ZSPACE TECHNOLOGY IN THE DISCIPLINES OF THE STEM CYCLE

Boyana Ivanova, Assist. Prof. Dr. Kamelia Shoilekova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Desislava Atanasova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Rumen Rusev, Assoc. Prof.

TEACHERS' ADAPTATION TO CHANGES IN AN INCREASINGLY COMPLEX WORLD THROUGH THE USE OF AI

Prof. Zhanat Nurbekova, Kanagat Baigusheva, Kalima Tuenbaeva, Bakyt Nurbekov Prof. Tsvetomir Vassilev

АТОСЕКУНДНОТО ОБУЧЕНИЕ – МЕТАФОРА НА ДНЕШНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Проф. д.н. Юлия Дончева, Денис Асенов, проф. д-р Ангел Смрикаров проф. д-р Цветомир Василев

APPLICATION AND ASSESSMENT OF DIGITAL RESOURCES IN THE EDUCATION OF FUTURE PEDAGOGUES

Dr. Galina Ivanova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Milena Velikova, Assist. Prof.

IDENTIFYING PLAYER TYPES IN THE CLASSROOM FOR EFFECTIVE GAMIFICATION

Dr. Desislava Atanasova, Assoc. Prof., Viliana Molnar

DEVELOPMENT AND INTEGRATION OF AUDIO AND VISUAL MICRO-RESOURCES IN THE LEARNING PROCESS THROUGH THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS

Dr. Petya Stefanova, Assist. Prof., Dr. Assist. Elitsa Ibryamova, Assist. Prof., Prof. Angel Smrikarov, Dr. Galina Ivanova, Assoc. Prof.

АНАЛИЗ НА ПРОГРАМНИТЕ МОДЕЛИ ЗА АВТОМАТИЗИРАНЕ НА КОГНИТИВНИ ПРОЦЕСИ

Доц. д-р Валентин Атанасов Доц. д-р Анелия Иванова

Книжка 5
MANAGING A POSITIVE AND LIFE-SKILLS DEVELOPMENT IN THE SCHOOL-BASED CURRICULA: A LITERATURE REVIEW ON THE SUSTAINABLE EDUCATION

Dr. Lindita Durmishi, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Ardian Durmishi Prof. Milena Filipova Dr. Silva Ibrahimi

APPLICATION OF THE COMPETENCY MODEL IN BUSINESS ADMINISTARATION HIGHER EDUCATION IN HORIZON 2030

Prof. Nadya Mironova, Dr. Tatyana Kicheva, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Miglena Angelova, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 4s
THE EDUCATION AND RESEARCH IN THE QUADRUPLE HELIX AND THE REGIONAL INNOVATION PROSPECTS

Prof. Dr. Milen Baltov Dr. Stela Baltova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Vilyana Ruseva, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 4
ATTITUDES OF STUDENTS – FUTURE TEACHERS, FOR THE APPLICATION OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Assoc. Prof. Nikolay Tsankov, DSc. Dr. Ivo Damyanov, Assist. Prof.

EDUCATIONAL NEEDS OF THE JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITALIZATION

Dr. Diana Dimitrova, Dr. Darina Dimitrova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Velina Koleva

MANAGERIAL ASPECTS OF COOPERATION AMONG HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THEIR STAKEHOLDERS

Prof. Olha Prokopenko, DSc. Dr. Svitlana Perova, Assoc. Prof. Prof. Tokhir Rakhimov, DSc.

APPLICATION OF EDUCATIONAL STRATEGIES IN STUDYING THE DYNAMICS OF STATE POWER STRUCTURES: IMPLEMENTATION OF FORMAL AND INFORMAL MECHANISMS OF INFLUENCE

Prof. Stoyan Denchev, DSc. Dr. Miriyana Pavlova, Assist. Prof. Dr. Steliana Yordanova, Assist. Prof.

ДИАГНОСТИКА НА ФОРМИРАНАТА ПРОФЕСИОНАЛНА КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТ НА БЪДЕЩИ ИНЖЕНЕРИ ПО ЕНЕРГЕТИКА

Гл. ас. д-р Надя Илиева Доц. д-р Елена Бояджиева Ивалина Маринова

Книжка 3s
A MODEL FOR CALCULATING THE INDIRECT ADDED VALUE OF AI FOR BUSINESS

Dr. Petya Biolcheva, Assoc. Prof., Prof. Nikolay Sterev, DSc.

AI EFFECTIVENESS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF INVESTMENTS IN HIGH-RISK START-UPS

Sotir Ivanov, PhD Student, Dr. Petya Biolcheva, Assoc. Prof.

COMPETITIVENESS OF TEXTILE PRODUCERS IN DIGITAL BUSINESS ERA

Prof. Nikolay Sterev, DSc., Dr. Vyara Milusheva, Assoc. Prof.

CHALLANGES OF USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MANAGEMENT DECISION MAKING

Dr. Bozhana Stoycheva, Assist. Prof. Dr. Pavel Vitliemov, Assoc. Prof.

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ERASMUS+ MOBILITY IN BUSINESS EDUCATION: AN EXAMINATION OF A SUCCESSFUL BULGARIAN-MEXICAN COLLABORATION

Dr. Lyudmila Mihaylova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Emil Papazov, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Diana E. Woolfolk Ruiz

Книжка 3
ИГРОВИ ПОДХОДИ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО: УНИВЕРСИТЕТСКИ КОНТЕКСТ

Проф. д.н. Цветан Давидков Силвия Тонева, докторант

Книжка 2
FORMATION OF PROFESSIONAL SKILLS OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERS DURING LABORATORY PRACTICE WHEN STUDYING FUNDAMENTAL SCIENCE

Dr. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Oksana Bulgakova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Oksana Zakhutska, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Maria Bondar, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lesia Zbaravska, Assoc. Prof.

ИМИДЖ НА УНИВЕРСИТЕТА

Проф. д.п.н. Галя Христозова

Книжка 1s
COMPETITIVENESS AS A RESULT OF CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION

Dr. Nikolay Krushkov, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ralitza Zayakova-Krushkova

INNOVATION, TECHNICAL PROGRESS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Dr. Aleksandar Aleksandrov, Assist. Prof.

ENHANCING ECONOMIC SECURITY THROUGH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Dr. Dimiter Gantchev, Assist. Prof.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND SECURITY IN THE INTEGRATED CIRCUITS INDUSTRY

Dr. Ivan Nachev, Dr. Yuliana Tomova, Iskren Konstantinov, PhD student, Marina Spasova, student

GREEN TRADEMARKS AND SUSTAINABILITY

Dr. Silviya Todorova, Assist. Prof.

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ITS PROTECTION AS AN INVENTION

Dr. Vladislava Pаcheva, Assist. Prof.

Книжка 1
PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Prof. Dr. Milena Filipova Prof. Dr. Olha Prokopenko Prof. Dr. Igor Matyushenko, Dr. Olena Khanova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Olga Shirobokova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ardian Durmishi

RESEARCH OF USING THE SYSTEM APPROACH TO INCREASE PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE OF STUDENTS IN THE PROCESS OF STUDYING NATURAL SCIENCES

Dr. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Іnna Savytska, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Oksana Bulgakova, Assoc. Prof. Prof. Iryna Yasinetska, Dr. Lesia Zbaravska, Assoc. Prof.

2023 година
Книжка 6s
TRANSFORMING MARITIME EDUCATION FOR A DIGITAL INDUSTRY

Dr. Christiana Atanasova, Assist. Prof.

DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMON INFORMATION SYSTEM TO CREATE A DIGITAL CAREER CENTER TOGETHER WITH PARTNER HIGHER SCHOOLS

Prof. Dr. Yordanka Angelova, Dr. Rossen Radonov, Assoc. Prof. Vasil Kuzmov, Assist. Prof. Stela Zhorzh Derelieva-Konstantinova

DRAFTING A DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION STRATEGY FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT SECTOR – EMPIRICAL STUDY ON UAE

Mounir el Khatib, Shikha al Ali, Ibrahim Alharam, Ali Alhajeri Dr. Gabriela Peneva, Assist. Prof., Prof. Jordanka Angelova, Mahmoud Shanaa

VOYAGE OF LEARNING: CRUISE SHIPS WEATHER ROUTING AND MARITIME EDUCATION

Prof. Svetlana Dimitrakieva, Dr. Dobrin Milev, Assist. Prof., Dr. Christiana Atanasova, Assist. Prof.

RESEARCH ON THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT COMPETENCES OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN PRACTICE

Land. arch. Elena Dragozova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Stanislava Kovacheva, Assoc. Prof.

STUDY OF THE KEY FACTORS INFLUENCING THE EFFECTIVE PLANNING AND UTILIZATION OF PRODUCTION FACILITIES IN THE INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISE

Dr. Tanya Panayotova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Krasimira Dimitrova, Assoc. Prof., Neli Veleva, PhD student

SIMULATOR TRAINING – UNIQUE POWERFUL INSTRUMENT FOR EDUCATING, SKILLS CREATING, MITIGATING SKILLS AND RESILIENCE CREATING

Prof. Dimitar Dimitrakiev, Vencislav Stankov, Assist. Prof., Dr. Christiana Atanasova, Assist. Prof.

СТРУКТУРНИ ПРОМЕНИ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО НА МЕНИДЖЪРИ ЗА ИНДУСТРИЯ 5.0

Доц. д-р Недко Минчев, доц. д-р Венета Христова, гл. ас. д-р Иван Стоянов

RESEARCH OF THE INNOVATION CAPACITY OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS

Dr. Siya Veleva, Assoc. Prof.; Prof. Dr. Eng. Margarita Mondeshka Dr. Anka Tsvetanova, Assoc. Prof.,

Книжка 6
Книжка 5s
ПРЕСЕЧНАТА ТОЧКА НА СПОРТА, СИГУРНОСТТА И КРИПТО ФЕН ТОКЕНИТЕ

Полк. доц. Георги Маринов Доц. Милена Кулева

ВИДОВЕ ТРАВМИ В ПАРАШУТИЗМА И ПРЕВЕНЦИЯТА ИМ

Капитан III ранг Георги Калинов

ОБУЧЕНИЕ В ХОДЕНЕ С ПОМОЩНИ СРЕДСТВА – РИСКОВЕ И СИГУРНОСТ ЗА ПАЦИЕНТА

Атанас Друмев Доц. д-р Данелина Вачева, доц. д-р Искра Петкова

Книжка 5
ПОДХОДИ ЗА ПСИХОСОЦИАЛНА ПОДКРЕПА НА УНИВЕРСИТЕТСКИ ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛИ В УСЛОВИЯ НА КРИЗА

Доц. д.н. Цветелина Търпоманова, доц. д.н. Веселина Славова

Книжка 4s
DETERMINING THE DEGREE OF DIGITALIZATION OF A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION

Acad. DSc. Hristo Beloev, Prof. Dr. Angel Smrikarov, Assoc. Prof. DSc. Valentina Voinohovska, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Galina Ivanova

A STUDY ON THE POSSIBILITIES TO INTEGRATE THE MODERN 3D TECHNOLOGIES IN THE SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

Prof. Dr. Georgi Hristov, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Plamen Zahariev, Assist. Prof. Dr. Diyana Kinaneva, Assist. Prof. Georgi Georgiev

THE ROLE OF THE UNIVERSITIES AS ACCELERATORS FOR THE INTEGRATION OF THE STEM LEARNING METHODS IN THE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS

Prof. Dr. Georgi Hristov, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Plamen Zahariev, Assist. Prof. Georgi Georgiev

ОТ STEM КЪМ BEST: ДВА СТАНДАРТА, ЕДНА ЦЕЛ

Проф. д-р Андрей Захариев, проф. д-р Стефан Симеонов, гл. ас. д-р Таня Тодорова

ВЪЗМОЖНОСТИ ЗА ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА БЛОКЧЕЙН ТЕХНОЛОГИЯТА В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Докторант Андриан Минчев, доц. д-р Ваня Стойкова

ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВА НА ДИГИТАЛНАТА ТРАНСФОРМАЦИЯ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО – СРАВНИТЕЛЕН АНАЛИЗ НА СТУДЕНТСКОТО МНЕНИЕ

Гл. ас. д-р Мирослава Бонева, доц. д-р Антон Недялков, проф. д.н. Милена Кирова

CHALLENGES, REQUIREMENTS, OPPORTUNITIES AND SOLUTIONS FOR THE DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE TRANSPORT EDUCATION

Prof. Dr. Georgi Hristov, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Plamen Zahariev

Книжка 4
EFFECT OF RESILIENCE ON BURNOUT IN ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

Dr. Radina Stoyanova, Prof. Sonya Karabeliova, Petya Pandurova, Dr. Nadezhda Zheckova Dr. Kaloyan Mitev

STATE AND PROSPECTS OF DEVELOPMENT OF ACADEMIC MOBILITY IN THE SYSTEM OF TRAINING A SPECIAL EDUCATION SPECIALIST

Dr. Tetiana Dokuchyna, Assoc. Prof., Prof. Dr. Svitlana Myronova, Dr. Tetiana Franchuk, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 3s
STRATEGIES AND POLICIES TO SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT OF AI TECHNOLOGIES IN EUROPE

Assoc. Prof. Miglena Molhova, Assoc. Prof. Petya Biolcheva

BULGARIA'S TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH THE PRISM OF HIGHER EDUCATION POLICIES

Assoc. Prof. Ivaylo B. Ivanov, Assoc. Prof. Miglena Molhova

INTELLIGENT ANIMAL HUSBANDRY: FARMER ATTITUDES AND A ROADMAP FOR IMPLEMENTATION

Prof. Dr. Dimitrios Petropoulos, Koutroubis Fotios Assoc. Prof. Petya Biolcheva Evgeni Valchev

EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES IN TOURISM THROUGH MOTIVATION

Assoc. Prof. Fahri Idriz Assoc. Prof. Marin Geshkov

Книжка 3
САМООЦЕНКА НА ОБЩООБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИТЕ И РЕСУРСНИТЕ УЧИТЕЛИ ЗА РАБОТА В ПАРАДИГМАТА НА ПРИОБЩАВАЩОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Проф. д.н. Милен Замфиров, проф. Емилия Евгениева, проф. Маргарита Бакрачева

STUDY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE USE OF COMMUNICATIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS OF ENGINEERS TRAINING

Assoc. Prof. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof. Valentina Vasileva Assoc. Prof. Sergii Bilan, Assoc. Prof. Maria Bondar, Assoc. Prof. Oksana Bulgakova, Assoc. Prof. Lyubov Shymko

SAFETY THROUGH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE MARITIME INDUSTRY

Assoc. Prof. Petya Biolcheva Evgeni Valchev, PhD student

Книжка 2
РАЗПОЛОЖЕНИЕ НА ВИСШИТЕ УЧИЛИЩА В БЪЛГАРИЯ В КОНТЕКСТА НА ФОРМИРАНЕ НА ПАЗАРА НА ТРУДА

Гл. ас. д-р Цветелина Берберова-Вълчева, доц. д-р Камен Петров, доц. д-р Николай Цонков

CHARACTERISTICS AND COMPONENTS OF THE CYBER HYGIENE AS A SUBCLASS OF CYBER SECURITY IN MILITARY ENVIRONMENT AND EDUCATIONAL ISSUES

Prof. Boyan Mednikarov, DSc. Prof. Yuliyan Tsonev Dr. Borislav Nikolov, Prof. Andon Lazarov, DSc.

Книжка 1
MODERNIZATION OF THE CONTENT OF THE LECTURE COURSE IN PHYSICS FOR TRAINING FUTURE AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERS

Dr. Ivan Beloev, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Valentina Vasileva, Assoc. Prof. Prof. Vasyl Shynkaruk, DSc., Assoc. Prof. Oksana Bulgakova, Assoc. Prof. Maria Bondar Assoc. Prof. Lesia Zbaravska, Assoc. Prof. Sergii Slobodian

THE NEW PANDEMIC NORMAL THROUGH THE EYES OF BULGARIAN STUDENTS

Prof. Vyara Stoilova, Assoc. Prof. Todorka Kineva

2022 година
Книжка 6
ORGANIZATION OF AN INCLUSIVE EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT FOR THE STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS

Prof. Halyna Bilavych Prof. Nataliia Bakhmat Prof. Tetyana Pantiuk, Prof. Mykola Pantiuk Prof. Borys Savchuk

ДИГИТАЛИЗАЦИЯ НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО В БЪЛГАРИЯ: СЪСТОЯНИЕ И ОБЩИ ТЕНДЕНЦИИ

Д-р Теодора Върбанова, проф. д-р Албена Вуцова, доц. д-р Николай Нетов

СКРИНИНГ НА ЗРЕНИЕТО – ПРОФИЛАКТИКА И ЕЛЕМЕНТ ОТ ПРАКТИКАТА НА СТУДЕНТИ И ОБУЧЕНИЕТО НА УЧЕНИЦИ

Руска Драганова-Христова, д-р Славена Стойкова, доц. д-р Снежана Йорданова

Книжка 5
ПРАВОТО НА ИЗБОР В ЖИВОТА НА ДЕЦАТА В РЕПУБЛИКА БЪЛГАРИЯ

Проф. д.п.н. Сийка Чавдарова-Костова, гл. ас. д-р Даниела Рачева, ас. Екатерина Томова, доц. д-р Росица Симеонова

SUSTAINABLE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH COACHING: BENEFITS FOR TEACHERS AND LEARNERS

Assoc. Prof. Irina Ivanova, Assoc. Prof. Penka Kozhuharova, Prof. Rumyana Todorova

SELF-ASSESSMENT – A COMPONENT OF THE COMPETENCE-BASED TRAINING IN THE PROFESSION “APPLIED PROGRAMMER”

Assoc. Prof. Ivaylo Staribratov, Muharem Mollov, Rosen Valchev Petar Petrov

Книжка 4
BENCHMARKING FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SPEED AND POWER CHARACTERISTICS

Assist. Prof. Dr. Darinka Ignatova Assoc. Prof. Dr. Alexander Iliev

DIAGNOSIS AS A TOOL FOR MONITORING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ADDICTION PREVENTION IN ADOLESCENTS

Prof. O.A. Selivanova Assoc. Prof. N.V. Bystrova, Assoc. Prof. I.I. Derecha, Assoc. Prof. T.S. Mamontova, Assoc. Prof. O.V. Panfilova

Книжка 3
ПУБЛИЧНОТО РАЗБИРАНЕ НА НАУКАТА В МРЕЖОВИЯ СВЯТ

Д-р Светломир Здравков, д-р Мартин Й. Иванов, д-р Петя Климентова

ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ ЗА УСТОЙЧИВО РАЗВИТИЕ – ПРАКТИКО-ПРИЛОЖНИ АСПЕКТИ

Гл. ас. д-р Златка Ваклева Проф. д-р Тоня Георгиева

Книжка 2
PREPARATION OF PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS FOR COMMUNICATIVE AND RHETORICAL ACTIVITY IN SCHOOL IN THE CONTEXT OF THEIR PRACTICAL TRAINING

Prof. Halyna Bilavych Prof. Nataliia Bakhmat Prof. Tetyana Pantyuk, Prof. Mykola Pantyuk Prof. Borys Savchuk

ПРОЛЕТНА КОНФЕРЕНЦИЯ НА СЪЮЗА НА МАТЕМАТИЦИТЕ В БЪЛГАРИЯ

(Трявна, 5 – 9 април 2022) Гл. ас. д-р Албена Симова

Книжка 1
ДИГИТАЛНАТА ИНТЕРАКЦИЯ ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛ – СТУДЕНТ В ОНЛАЙН ОБУЧЕНИЕТО В МЕДИЦИНСКИТЕ УНИВЕРСИТЕТИ

Д-р Миглена Търновска, д-р Румяна Стоянова Доц. Боряна Парашкевова, проф. Юлияна Маринова

2021 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ЕДНА РЕКАПИТУЛАЦИЯ НА ИЗСЛЕДВАНИЯ ВЪРХУ ИНТЕРКУЛТУРНИТЕ ОТНОШЕНИЯ. КАКВО СЛЕДВА ОТ ТОВА ЗА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО?

Давидков, Ц., 2019. Изследвания върху културите. Културни ориентири на управлението. София: СУ „Св. Климент Охридски“, ISBN 978-954-9399-52-3 Проф. Пламен Макариев

Книжка 4s
RECOGNITION OF FAKE NEWS IN SPORTS

Colonel Assoc. Prof. Petko Dimov

SIGNAL FOR HELP

Ina Vladova, Milena Kuleva

Книжка 4
PREMISES FOR A MULTICULTURAL APPROACH TO EDUCATION

Dr. Anzhelina Koriakina, Assoc. Prof., Prof. Lyudmila Amanbaeva, DSc.

ПОЗИТИВНА ПСИХОЛОГИЯ: ПРОБЛЕМНИ ОБЛАСТИ И ФОРМИРАНЕ НА ЛИЧНОСТТА

Доц. д-р Стоил Мавродиев, Любомира Димитрова

КНИГА ЗА ИСТОРИЯТА НА БЪЛГАРСКОТО ВИСШЕ ИНЖЕНЕРНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Сгурев, В., Гергов, С., Иванов, Г., 2019. Положителните науки с приложение към индустрията. История на висшето техническо образование в България. София: Изд. на БАН „Проф. Марин Дринов“, Изд. „Захарий Стоянов“. ISBN 978-619-245-004-5, ISBN 978-954-09-1387-2.

Книжка 3
ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND INTERDISCIPLINARY EDUCATION – SEMIOTIC ASPECTS

Prof. Dr. Christo Kaftandjiev Dr. Diana Kotova

THE PRACTICAL IMPORTANCE OF ACCOUNTING EDUCATION FOR FUTURE MANAGERS

Nataliia Radionova, DSc. Dr. Radostina Stoyanova, Assist. Prof.

ЗА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНАТА ИНТЕГРАЦИЯ И ЗАЛОЗИТЕ НА НАСТОЯЩЕТО

Нунев, Й., 2020. Мониторинг на процесите на приобщаване и образователна интеграция и модели за десегрегация на ромското образование. Пловдив: Астарта, ISBN 978-954-350-283-7

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
METHODOLOGY OF SAFETY AND QUALITY OF LIFE ON THE BASIS OF NOOSPHERIC EDUCATION SYSTEM FORMATION

Nataliia Bakhmat Nataliia Ridei, Nataliia Tytova, Vladyslava Liubarets, Oksana Katsero

ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ В УСТОЙЧИВО РАЗВИТИЕ И ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЕ „ДЕТЕ – СРЕДА“

Стоянова, М. (2020). Образование в устойчиво развитие и взаимодействие „дете – среда“ София: Авангард принт. ISBN 978-954-337-408-3

2020 година
Книжка 6
HIGHER EDUCATION AS A PUBLIC GOOD

Yulia Nedelcheva, Miroslav Nedelchev

Книжка 5
НАСЪРЧАВАНЕ НА СЪТРУДНИЧЕСТВОТО МЕЖДУ ВИСШИТЕ УЧИЛИЩА И БИЗНЕСА

Добринка Стоянова, Блага Маджурова, Гергана Димитрова, Стефан Райчев

Книжка 4
THE STRATEGY OF HUMAN RIGHTS STUDY IN EDUCATION

Anush Balian Nataliya Seysebayeva Natalia Efremova Liliia Danylchenko

Книжка 3
ПОМОЩНИ СРЕДСТВА И ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ПРИОБЩАВАЩОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Янкова, Ж. (2020). Помощни средства и технологии за деца и ученици със специални образователни потребности в приобщаващото образование.

Книжка 2
МИГРАЦИЯ И МИГРАЦИОННИ ПРОЦЕСИ

Веселина Р. Иванова

SOCIAL STATUS OF DISABLED PEOPLE IN RUSSIA

Elena G. Pankova, Tatiana V. Soloveva, Dinara A. Bistyaykina, Olga M. Lizina

Книжка 1
ETHNIC UPBRINGING AS A PART OF THE ETHNIC CULTURE

Sholpankulova Gulnar Kenesbekovna

ЗА СВЕТЛИНАТА, КОЯТО ИЗЛЪЧВА… В ПАМЕТ НА ПРОФ. Д.П.Н. АСЕМГУЛ МАЛДАЖАНОВА

Нашата редколегия загуби един все- отдаен и неповторим колега и приятел – проф. д.п.н. Асемгул Малдажанова. Пе- дагог по призвание и филолог по мисия! Отиде си от нас нашият приятел, коле- га и член на редколегията на списанието – професор д.п.н. Асемгул Малдажанова – първи заместник-ректор на Евразийския

2019 година
Книжка 6
EMOTIONAL COMPETENCE OF THE SOCIAL TEACHER

Kadisha K. Shalgynbayeva Ulbosin Zh.Tuyakova

Книжка 5
„ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИ КИНОХОРИЗОНТИ“ В ПОЛЕТО НА МЕДИА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

(2018). Образователни кинохоризонти. Международен сборник с научни публи- кации по проект „Естетически и образователни проекции на кинодидактиката“. Бургас: Проф. д-р Асен Златаров. Съставител: Маргарита Терзиева. ISBN 978-954-471-496-3

Книжка 4
ВИСШЕТО МОРСКО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ В КОНКУРЕНТНА СРЕДА

Бакалов, Я. (2019). Висше морско образование. Лидиране в конкурентна среда. Варна: Стено. ISBN 978-619-241-029-2

Книжка 3
УЧИЛИЩЕТО НА БЪДЕЩЕТО

Наталия Витанова

Книжка 2
КНИГА ЗА УСПЕШНИТЕ НАУЧНИ ПУБЛИКАЦИИ

Кожухаров, А. (2018). Успешните научни публикации. Варна: Тера Балканика. ISBN 978-619-90844-1-0

Книжка 1
POST-GRADUATE QUALIFICATION OF TEACHERS IN INTERCULTURAL EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT

Irina Koleva, Veselin Tepavicharov, Violeta Kotseva, Kremena Yordanova

ДЕЦАТА В КОНСТИТУЦИОННИТЕ НОРМИ НА БЪЛГАРИЯ

Румен Василев, Весела Марева

СЪСТОЯНИЕ НА БЪЛГАРСКОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Анелия Любенова Любомир Любенов

ИНТЕРКУЛТУРНИЯТ ТРЕНИНГ КАТО ЧАСТ ОТ СТРАТЕГИЯТА ЗА ГЛОБАЛИЗАЦИОННА ИНТЕГРАЦИЯ

Хубенова, М. (2018). Значение на междукултурната комуникация за направления: политически науки, право, икономика и бизнес. София: Издателски комплекс УНСС. ISBN 978-619-232-072-0

ЕДИН НОВ УЧЕБНИК

Дончева, Ю. (2018). Теоретични и методически основи на запознаване с околния свят в детската градина. Русе: Лени Ан

2018 година
Книжка 6
СТРАТЕГИИ НА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНАТА И НАУЧНАТА ПОЛИТИКА НАУЧНО СПИСАНИЕ STRATEGIES FOR POLICY IN SCIENCE AND EDUCATION EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL ГОДИНА XXVI / VOLUME 26, 2018 ANNUAL CONTENTS / ГОДИШНО СЪДЪРЖАНИЕ СТРАНИЦИ / PAGES КНИЖКА 1 / NUMBER 1: 1 – 120 КНИЖКА 2 / NUMBER 2: 121 – 224 КНИЖКА 3 / NUMBER 3: 225 – 336 КНИЖКА 4 / NUMBER 4: 337 – 448 КНИЖКА 5 / NUMBER 5: 449 – 560 КНИЖКА 6 / NUMBER 6: 561 – 664

ДИСКУСИОННО / DISCUSSION 211 – 216: Процедурата за назначаване на ръководител на катедра като причина за вло- шаващото се качество на обучението и микроклимата във висшите учи лища у нас [The Procedure for Appointing a Head of Department as a Reason for the Deteriorating Quality of Education and the Microclimate in the Higher School] / Александър Димит- ров / Alexander Dimitrov

Книжка 5
A NEW AWARD FOR PROFESSOR MAIRA KABAKOVA

The staff of the Editorial board of the journal “Strategies for Policy in Science and Education” warmly and sincerely congratulates their Kazakhstan colleague -

ПРОДЪЛЖАВАЩАТА КВАЛИФИКАЦИЯ НА УЧИТЕЛИТЕ – НОРМАТИВЕН И ИЗСЛЕДОВАТЕЛСКИ ОБЗОР

(научно-теоретично обобщение върху проведени обучения на учители)

ЕТНОЦЕНТРИЗМЪТ И ИНЕРЦИИТЕ ОТ МИНАЛОТО – СЕРИОЗНИ ПРОБЛЕМИ В БЪЛГАРСКАТА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА СИСТЕМА

(Eтнопедагогически аспекти на основното и средното образование) Веселин Тепавичаров

Книжка 4
ХРИСТО БОТЕВ И ПОЗНАВАТЕЛНИЯТ КРЪГОЗОР НА СЪВРЕМЕННИТЕ СТУДЕНТИ ЗА ЕВРОПА

Изследователски разказ за един познавателен подвиг и за една познавателна недостатъчност

Книжка 3
BLENDED EDUCATION IN HIGHER SCHOOLS: NEW NETWORKS AND MEDIATORS

Nikolay Tsankov Veska Gyuviyska Milena Levunlieva

ВЗАИМОВРЪЗКАТА МЕЖДУ СПОРТА И ПРАВОТО

Ивайло Прокопов, Елица Стоянова

НАДНАЦИОНАЛНИ И МЕЖДУПРАВИТЕЛСТВЕНИ МЕТОДИ НА ИНТЕГРАЦИЯ В ОБЛАСТТА НА ПРАВОСЪДИЕТО И СИГУРНОСТТА

(Формиране на обща миграционна политика: парадигми и образователни аспекти) Лора Махлелиева-Кларксън

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
ВЪЗПРИЯТИЯ И НАГЛАСИ НА УЧЕНИЦИТЕ ПО ВАЖНИ ОБЩЕСТВЕНИ ВЪПРОСИ

(Данни от Международното изследване на гражданското образование – ICCS 2016)

2017 година
Книжка 6
ЗНАЧИМОСТТА НА УЧЕНЕТО: АНАЛИЗ НА ВРЪЗКИТЕ МЕЖДУ ГЛЕДНИТЕ ТОЧКИ НА УЧЕНИЦИ, РОДИТЕЛИ И УЧИТЕЛИ

Илиана Мирчева, Елена Джамбазова, Снежана Радева, Деян Велковски

ВЪЗПРИЯТИЯ И НАГЛАСИ НА УЧЕНИЦИТЕ ПО ВАЖНИ ОБЩЕСТВЕНИ ВЪПРОСИ

(Данни от Международното изследване на гражданското образование – ICCS 2016)

СТРАТЕГИИ НА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНАТА И НАУЧНАТА ПОЛИТИКА НАУЧНО СПИСАНИЕ STRATEGIES FOR POLICY IN SCIENCE AND EDUCATION EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL ГОДИНА XXV / VOLUME 25, 2017 ANNUAL CONTENTS / ГОДИШНО СЪДЪРЖАНИЕ

СТРАНИЦИ / PAGES КНИЖКА 1 / NUMBER 1: 1 – 112 КНИЖКА 2 / NUMBER 2: 113 – 224 КНИЖКА 3 / NUMBER 3: 225 – 336 КНИЖКА 4 / NUMBER 4: 337 – 448 КНИЖКА 5 / NUMBER 5: 449 – 552 КНИЖКА 6 / NUMBER 6: 553 – 672

Книжка 5
ОРГАНИЗАЦИОННА КУЛТУРА В УЧИЛИЩЕ

Ивайло Старибратов, Лилия Бабакова

Книжка 4
КОУЧИНГ. ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЕН КОУЧИНГ

Наталия Витанова, Нели Митева

Книжка 3
ТЕХНОХУМАНИЗМЪТ И ДЕЙТЪИЗМЪТ – НОВИТЕ РЕЛИГИИ НА БЪДЕЩЕТО

Harari, Y. N. (2016). Homo Deus. A Brief History of Tomorrow. Harvill Secker. ISBN-10: 1910701874

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
РЕФОРМИТЕ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО – ПЕРСПЕКТИВИ И ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВА

Интервю с Габриела Миткова, началник на Регионалното управление на образованието – Силистра

ЕМПАТИЯ И РЕФЛЕКСИЯ

Нели Кънева, Кристиана Булдеева

2016 година
Книжка 6
СТРАТЕГИИ НА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНАТА И НАУЧНАТА ПОЛИТИКА НАУЧНО СПИСАНИЕ STRATEGIES FOR POLICY IN SCIENCE AND EDUCATION EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL ГОДИНА XXIV / VOLUME 24, 2016 ANNUAL CONTENT / ГОДИШНО СЪДЪРЖАНИЕ

СТРАНИЦИ / PAGES КНИЖКА 1 / NUMBER 1: 1 – 120 КНИЖКА 2 / NUMBER 2: 121 – 232 КНИЖКА 3 / NUMBER 3: 233 – 344 КНИЖКА 4 / NUMBER 4: 345 – 456 КНИЖКА 5 / NUMBER 5: 457 – 568 КНИЖКА 6 / NUMBER 6: 569 – 672

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2014 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
КОХЕРЕНТНОСТ НА ПОЛИТИКИ

Албена Вуцова, Лиляна Павлова

Книжка 4
ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО ПО ПРАВАТА НА ЧОВЕКА ПРЕЗ ПОГЛЕДА НА ДОЦ. ЦЕЦКА КОЛАРОВА

Цецка Коларова. (2013). Образование по правата на човека. София: Авангард Прима. ISBN 978-619-160-234-6

USING THE RESULTS OF A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT

Thomas Kellaghan Vincent Greaney T. Scott Murray Chapter 4 Translating Assessment Findings Into Policy And Action Although the primary purpose of a system of national assessment is to describe students’ learning, its role is not limited to description. To justify the effort and expenditure involved, the information that an assessment provides about the achievements of students, their strengths and weaknesses, and how they are distributed in the population (for example, by gender or location

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF UNIVERSITY FACULTY: А SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS

Gulnar Toltaevna Balakayeva Alken Shugaybekovich Tokmagambetov Sapar Imangalievich Ospanov

ЗА ПО-ХУМАНИСТИЧНА ТРАДИЦИОННО- ИНОВАЦИОННА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНО-ВЪЗПИТАТЕЛНА СТРАТЕГИЯ У НАС

(КОНЦЕПТУАЛНА РАЗРАБОТКА В ПОМОЩ НА ПОДГОТОВКАТА НА НОВ ЗАКОН ЗА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО)

Книжка 1
РЕФЛЕКСИЯТА В ИНТЕГРАТИВНОТО ПОЛЕ НА МЕТОДИКАТА НА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО ПО БИОЛОГИЯ

Иса Хаджиали, Наташа Цанова, Надежда Райчева, Снежана Томова

USING THE RESULTS OF A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT

Thomas Kellaghan Vincent Greaney T. Scott Murray Chapter 1 Factors affecting the use and nonuse of national assessment fi ndings The main objectives of a national assessment, as set out in volume 1 of this series, Assessing National Achievement Levels in Education, are to determine (a) how well students are learning in the education system (with reference to general expectations, aims of the curriculum, and preparation for further learning and for life); (b) whether there is evidence of par

2013 година
Книжка 6
Книжка 5
Книжка 4
QUESTIONNAIRE DEVELOPMENT

ÎÖÅÍßÂÀÍÅÒÎ

РОССИЙСКАЯ СИСТЕМА ОЦЕНКИ КАЧЕСТВА ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ: ГЛАВНЫЕ УРОКИ

В. Болотов / И. Вальдман / Г. Ковалёва / М. Пинская

Книжка 3
MASS MEDIA CULTURE IN KAZAKHSTAN

Aktolkyn Kulsariyeva Yerkin Massanov Indira Alibayeva

РОССИЙСКАЯ СИСТЕМА ОЦЕНКИ КАЧЕСТВА ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ: ГЛАВНЫЕ УРОКИ

В. Болотов / И. Вальдман / Г. Ковалёва / М. Пинская

Книжка 2
ОЦЕНЯВАНЕ НА ГРАЖДАНСКИТЕ КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТИ НА УЧЕНИЦИТЕ: ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВА И ВЪЗМОЖНОСТИ

Светла Петрова Център за контрол и оценка на качеството на училищното образование

Книжка 1
Уважаеми читатели,

вет, както и от международния борд за предоставените статии и студии, за да могат да бъдат идентифицирани в полето на образованието пред широката аудитория от педа- гогически специалисти във всички степени на образователната ни система. Благодаря за техния всеотдаен и безвъзмезден труд да създават и популяризират мрежа от научни съобщества по профила на списанието и да насърчават научните изследвания. Благодаря на рецензентите от национално представените висши училища, на- учни институции и

METHODS FOR SETTING CUT SCORES IN CRITERION – REFERENCED ACHIEVEMENT TESTS

ÎÖÅÍßÂÀÍÅÒÎ COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE QUALITY OF THE SEPARATE METHODS

ПУБЛИКАЦИИ ПРЕЗ 2012 Г.

СПИСАНИЕ „БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕЗИК И ЛИТЕРАТУРА“

2012 година
Книжка 6
DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE IN KAZAKHSTAN IN THE PERIOD OF INDEPENDENCE

Aigerim Mynbayeva Maira Kabakova Aliya Massalimova

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
СИСТЕМАТА ЗА РАЗВИТИЕ НА АКАДЕМИЧНИЯ СЪСТАВ НА РУСЕНСКИЯ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ „АНГЕЛ КЪНЧЕВ“

Христо Белоев, Ангел Смрикаров, Орлин Петров, Анелия Иванова, Галина Иванова

Книжка 2
ПРОУЧВАНЕ НА РОДИТЕЛСКОТО УЧАСТИЕ В УЧИЛИЩНИЯ ЖИВОТ В БЪЛГАРИЯ

* Този материал е изготвен въз основа на резултатите от изследването „Parental Involvement in Life of School Matters“, проведено в България в рамките на проек- та „Advancing Educational Inclusion and Quality in South East Europe“, изпълняван

ВТОРИ ФОРУМ ЗА СТРАТЕГИИ В НАУКАТА

Тошка Борисова В края на 2011 г. в София се проведе второто издание на Форум за страте- гии в науката. Основната тема бе повишаване на международната видимост и разпознаваемост на българската наука. Форумът се организира от „Elsevier“ – водеща компания за разработване и предоставяне на научни, технически и медицински информационни продукти и услуги , с подкрепата на Министер- ството на образованието, младежта и науката. След успеха на първото издание на Форума за стратегии в науката през

Книжка 1
РЕЙТИНГИ, ИНДЕКСИ, ПАРИ

Боян Захариев