Педагогика

https://doi.org/10.53656/ped2025-1.08

2025/1, стр. 129 - 139

METHODOLOGICAL BASICS OF THE EXPERIMENT IN PEDAGOGY

Delyan Penchev
OrcID: 0000-0002-4043-5071
E-mail: d.penchev@ts.uni-vt.bg
St. Cyril and St. Methodius University of Veliko Tarnovo
Veliko Tarnovo Bulgaria

Резюме: Pedagogy is a field of science in which some characteristics of both social studies and humanities intersect. This has the greatest impact on the philosophical and methodological basis on which various educational studies are carried out, particularly the ones where the main research method is the experiment. In this context, positivism and hermeneutics are most influential. Taking all this into account, this article focuses not so much on the separate examination of these epistemological schools, but on the peculiarities of their simultaneous application. The main goal is to find an answer to the question of how positivism and hermeneutics converge in the experimental educational study. The main research method is philosophical and methodological analysis.

Ключови думи: educational experiment; methodology; methodological pluralism; positivism; hermeneutics

Pedagogy is a “science that combines fundamental (strictly theoretical) and applied aspects” (Radev 2003, p. 1). This means that both theory and practice are essential for its development, as well as the specific ways of conveying knowledge between them. The latter aspect significantly concerns the philosophical and methodological issues related to the ways, i.e. the methods of establishing different but sustainable and quality relationships between educational theory and practice, so as to provide an effective solution to the scientific problems.

All this directly influences the research activity of scholars in pedagogy, obliging them to constantly seek evidence that they are investigating real scientific problems, to strive for a continuous link with practice, etc. So, in the modern context, the unwritten rule is confirmed for the contributions of almost every educational study (save for theoretical and historico-theoretical studies, of course) to be attested through empirical methods, especially when it comes to new author approaches, methods, technologies, etc. For this purpose, observation and experiment are applied, which are deemed to ensure the highest reliability of the results obtained. In this sense, Anol Bhattacherjee states that an experiment-based study is perceived as a “‘gold standard’ in research designs” and as “one of the most rigorous of all research designs” (Bhattacherjee 2012, p. 83).

Given all of the above, this paper draws attention to the philosophical and methodological basis for applying the experiment method in pedagogy. In view of the very specific scientific status of pedagogy, “which lies between social studies and humanities” (Radev 2001, p. 9), this issue gains particular importance, as the educational experiment brings together various epistemological theories, concepts, and approaches.

With regard to the outlined object of research, it is crucial to emphasize that it is approached with profound reverence and with the full awareness that the issue is extremely complex, comprehensive, and almost boundless, not suggesting any clear and unambiguous answers. Due to all of these factors, the main goal is only to present a possible view on how positivism and hermeneutics (probably two of the most influential philosophical and methodological teachings) cross paths in the experimental activity of pedagogy.

The methods employed to achieve the above-mentioned goal include research and review of scholarly literature, as well as philosophical and methodological analysis of the basic concepts in the epistemological fields in question.

In one of his main works titled Obshta Pedagogika. Filosofia na Obrazovanieto (General Pedagogy: Philosophy of Education), Dimitar Tsvetkov pays serious attention to the methodological foundations of pedagogy. After presenting the nature of various epistemological aspects, he points out:

“The aforementioned cognitive methodologies as an expression of modern methodological pluralism are not mutually exclusive. The preference of any of them does not imply ignoring the others. Even if this disregard takes place consciously, the interaction of the others manifests itself unconsciously. There are no good or bad cognitive methodologies. There is also no true (reliable) methodology” (Tsvetkov 1994, p. 171).

There is hardly a modern scholar in the field of pedagogy who does not support this view. This is also confirmed in the sources studied for the purpose of this work, in which (the former), however, this idea seems to remain theoretically underdeveloped. And indeed, scholars are convinced of this pluralism in modern science, but the question of how exactly it manifests itself remains open. Also, where do the various cognitive methodologies intersect? Despite the attempts of some scholars to seek answers to these particular questions, the dominant approach continues to be primarily the separate presentation of their main characteristics, without looking for interrelations between them.

In this sense, I will make a modest attempt here to derive some peculiarities of the methodological pluralism of experimental educational research. For this purpose, I will try not to examine the methodological schools themselves – something that has already been done in a number of studies, but their intertwining in educational research based on experiment.

The most frequently mentioned philosophical and methodological areas in scientific literature concerning the field of pedagogy include positivism and its development into neo- and postpositivism; hermeneutics; phenomenology; structuralism; functionalism and so on, which refer to a lesser extent to the theory of knowledge in this field. This can be seen in the works of Dimitar Tsvetkov (Tsvetkov 1994), Plamen Radev (Radev 2001), Louis Cohen et al. (Cohen et al. 2007), Christoph Wulf (Wulf 2003), etc. Nonetheless, positivism, its predecessor called ‘empiricism,’ and hermeneutics are indicated as the most important approaches for the development of social studies and humanities, and pedagogy respectively.

According to Auguste Comte, the founder of positivism, the knowledge of reality can have three “theoretical conditions: the Theological, or fictitious; the Metaphysical, or abstract, and the Scientific, or positive” (Comte 1896, p. 2). In terms of the latter, he argues as follows:

“In the final, the positive state, the mind has given over the vain search after Absolute notions, the origin and destination of the universe, and the causes of phenomena, and applies itself to the study of their laws – that is, their invariable relations of succession and resemblance. Reasoning and observation, duly combined, are the means of this knowledge. What is now understood when we speak of an explanation of facts is simply the establishment of a connection between single phenomena and some general facts, the number of which continually diminishes with the progress of science.” (Comte 1896, p. 2).

Bearing this summarized version of Comte’s concept in mind, we can start by abstaining from the idea of an experimental educational study in which the researcher seeks to establish causal links between a particular learning method and how it affects students’ ability to solve textual math problems. According to the doctrine of empiricism, this should be achieved via the basic empirical methods of observation and experiment. John Stuart Mill, who was one of the leading 19thcentury philosophers, a continuer of Francis Bacon’s work, and a contemporary of Auguste Comte (the founder of positivism), thoroughly explores the issues of cause-and-effect relationships. In his view, social sciences are inherently deductive (Mill 1882). In this context, “when we set out the definitions and axioms used in evidence, we outline the basis which each proof rests on; the reasoning process is fully based on combining and transforming definitions and axioms provided at the outset” (Baranets 2013, p. 95). In this regard, Mill wrote the following:

“Thus, if the subject be social or historical phenomena, the premises of the Deductive Method must be the laws of the causes which determine that class of phenomena; and those causes are human actions, together with the general outward circumstances under the influence of which mankind are placed, and which constitute man’s position on the earth. The Deductive Method, applied to social phenomena, must begin, therefore, by investigating, or must supposed to have been already investigated, the laws of human action, and those properties of outward things by which the actions of human beings in society are determined. Some of these general truths will naturally be obtained by observation and experiment, others by deduction” (Mill 1882, p. 563).

After discussing the nature of his four inductive methods in detail, which are always achieved through experiment, Mill also sets out a number of significant disadvantages of these methods when applied in the field of social sciences and of those that shape the character, as he calls them. Therefore, with regard to the experiment from our example, two leading findings can be presented: first, it is necessary to lay out one or more theories, in the context of which all terms and concepts related to the development of mathematical competence, and particularly of the skills to solve textual problems; second, proving causal links is possible, but not with complete certainty due to the limitations of the inductive methods pointed out by Mill, and to the axioms which the theory/theories is/are based on.

Nevertheless, Auguste Comte definitively introduced the use of the experiment in social sciences. If Mill considers social phenomena multi-component and almost inseparable, then one can say the following about Comte’s methodological doctrine:

“The legacy of Comtean positivism to the process of social inquiry has revealed a series of interrelated assumptions and methodological commitments. These are, namely, that theory is to be universal rather than specific or context-bound and principally concerned with the generation of scientific laws. Such laws are affirmed on predictions derived from the study of social phenomena, whose interrelated variables may be examined independently so as to provide plausible theories and conditionally predictable outcomes” (Somekh et al. 2005, p. 199).

It is evident that, according to Comte, it is possible to break social reality down into relatively independent phenomena, and to examine them through their manifestations. The latter finding proves essential for experimental research in pedagogy, since all the phenomena studied become ideal constructs, which can be explored only through their manifestations; the ability to solve textual problems is a construct that can be measured and evaluated only when it manifests itself in some form.

Taking all of the above into account, we should raise the following important question: What is the scope of the positivist doctrine (based on empiricism) in a given experimental educational study from the perspective of accepting only empirically obtained knowledge as reliable through observation of and experiment with phenomena that can be objectively ascertained, measured, and evaluated? Let us get back to the example we provided. The ability to solve textual math problems is part of the students’ mathematical competence. There are different theories about its formation and development. On the other hand, the author’s approach, applied through experiment, has also been developed on the basis of certain concepts and theories. There are a number of factors that affect the actual implementation of the experiment, such as the motivation of the students, their personality traits, etc. It is obvious that the tools of the study cannot account for all these factors in unity. The scholar focuses primarily on the manifestations of a limited number of constructs, accepting the other factors as secondary.

Let me reiterate that, from the perspective of positivism, cause-and-effect relationships are only sought between a limited number of constructs, indicated by the scholar as the most relevant for the purposes of the study. The question is how the other components, which are also aspects of the object of study, are related to them. In this line of thought, the researcher should not only explain, but also “enter” the data obtained in the field of theories which the study is based on, i.e. to interpret them. This is the moment when positivism and hermeneutics cross paths, with the latter defined primarily by Wilhelm Dilthey and Hans-Georg Gadamer as a basic cognitive doctrine in the humanities.

Gadamer substantiates the need for applying hermeneutics in the following way:

“But the specific problem that the human sciences present to thought is that one has not rightly grasped their nature if one measures them by the yardstick of a progressive knowledge of regularity. The experience of the sociohistorical world cannot be raised to a science by the inductive procedure of the natural sciences. Whatever “science” may mean here, and even if all historical knowledge includes the application of experimental universals to the particular object of investigation, historical research does not endeavor to grasp the concrete phenomenon as an instance of a universal rule. The individual case does not serve only to confirm a law from which practical predictions can be made. Its ideal is rather to understand the phenomenon itself in its unique and historical concreteness. However much experimental universals are involved, the aim is not to confirm and extend these universalized experiences in order to attain knowledge of a law – e.g. how men, peoples, and states evolve – but to understand how this man, this people, or this state is what it has become or, more generally, how it happened that it is” (Gadamer 2004, p. 4).

With reference to pedagogy and the example I put forward above, all this means that, through hermeneutics, the issue of the development of mathematical competence in students should be considered situationally, contextually, and even historically. This may include factors such as family environment, a wider social environment, ethnicity, and many others. Of course, the research task is to clarify interrelationships – not causal ones in the sense of positivism, i.e. experimentally, but those that need to be understood in terms of meaning and conceptually, in the context of a scientific idea, theory, or conception. These factors cannot and, as Gadamer argues, should not be regarded as conditioned by strict regularities, but as individual, specific from the perspective of a broader historical, cultural, education, or other context, or as he puts it:

“An example will make this clear: a psychic structure, say an individual, acquires his individuality by developing his talents and at the same time experiencing the conditioning effect of circumstances. What emerges, the actual ‘individuality’ – i.e., the character of the individual – is not a mere consequence of the causal factors nor to be understood only in terms of these causes, but it constitutes a unity that is intelligible in itself, a unity of life that is expressed in every one of its manifestations and hence can be understood in each of them. Something becomes fused here to form a unique configuration, independently of the system of cause and effect. This is what Dilthey meant by ‘structural continuity’ and what, with Husserl, he now calls ‘significance’” (Gadamer 2004, p. 220).

In the same vein, Dilthey suggests that “we explain nature, while humans need to be understood” (Kostadinov 2012, p. 249). These are actually the two cognitive objectives of the doctrines of positivism and hermeneutics. Through the methods of the first doctrine, the scholar strives to explain, and through the second one to understand. All this poses another essential question, to which this study can hardly provide an exhaustive answer: Which aspects of the research object should be approached positivistically and which hermeneutically, given the pluralism between the two doctrines within the framework of experimental educational research? In other words, where will the researcher look for causal links through observation and experiment, and where will he/she try to examine the phenomena contextually, individually, etc., i.e., to comprehend them?

Supposedly, Dimitar Tsvetkov gives a partial answer to these questions:

“Experimentally obtained objective knowledge mentioned above cannot give a satisfactory explanation of the real pedagogical phenomena, but only help us to interpret and understand them; There are subjects acting and interacting in educational reality, the spiritual manifestations of which are unpredictable and inexplicable in many ways, and which do not fit into ready-made theoretical schemes and average objective dependencies” (Tsvetkov 1994, p. 182).

Again, with regard to the questions raised above, it can be said that we apply the positivist approach to what is universal, i.e., to what proves unchangeable in all aspects of the study and even in various studies. As for what is particular, single and not universal, and in terms of which no causal link can be established, scholars should try to understand and interpret it, because, as Gadamer puts it:

“Interpretation is necessary where the meaning of a text cannot be immediately understood. It is necessary wherever one is not prepared to trust what a phenomenon immediately presents to us.” (Gadamer 2004, p. 332).

In this sense, in the experimental study of the ability to solve textual problems in mathematics, the researcher will seek causal relationships between phenomena which are universal, i.e., which occur in all students more or less, such as the difficulty in composing a numerical expression for solving the problem. When it comes to phenomena which are found to be single or which do not always manifest themselves, the researcher should try to interpret them, and thus to understand their origin.

The next important moment has to do with the analysis as a research method used in every scientific study; the specifics and orientation of this method are determined with a view to the philosophical and methodological basis which the study rests upon. Therefore, I will try to outline the pluralism between the positivist and the hermeneutic analysis in the broadest terms.

In carrying out any type of analysis, the researcher always uses two main categories, namely ‘part’ and ‘whole.’ The main objective in applying the method is to elucidate the content of these categories, as well as the interrelationships between them. These are actually the basic features of the analysis as a scientific research method, which recur in each of its definitions. I have explored this in another work of mine (Penchev 2022).

In the positivistic analysis, causal links are sought between separate parts of the whole, as well as their relation to the whole itself. It can be said that this analysis ‘works’ above all within the research object and regards it as one that can be ‘broken down’ into components or parts. For example, the ability to solve textual math problems can be broken down into its building blocks, such as abstract thinking, distinguishing the essential from the non-essential in the text of the problem, etc. So, the researcher can look for interconnections between these parts of the whole, as well as for links between the degree of their formation and the qualitative manifestation of the whole (the ability to solve textual math problems).

On the other hand, according to Christoph Wulf, one of the two main tasks of the hermeneutic analysis is “the historico-hermeneutic examination of the (historical) texts pertinent to educational science and the hermeneutic study of educational research” (Wulf 2003, p. 26). Within the hermeneutic circle, this can be achieved, bearing in mind that “understanding the whole requires us to understand its parts, and that the latter understanding requires us to have an idea of the meaning of the whole” (Radev 2001, p. 25). The main difference between this type of analysis and the positivist one lies in what is considered a whole and what a part/parts of it.

In this sense, the part is the object of study, which has to be analyzed, interpreted and understood by referring to the whole which is a certain concept or theory. In terms of the example we are following, this means the ability to solve textual math problems (the object of this study), which is regarded as one of the manifestations of the student’s personality in his/her learning activities, and as related, for example, to the theories of his/her ethnic, cultural, sexual, and other conditionalities (appearing as a whole). So, in the hermeneutic analysis, the object of study cannot be broken down into components. It is perceived as a whole, the artificial breakdown of which would destroy its essential characteristics. The aim is to interpret and understand the object in a broader social and historical context, i.e., to reveal its place in and importance for the whole.

It should also be noted that, in the hermeneutic analysis, the relations between ‘part’ and ‘whole’ are not causal, but above all semantic.

Donatella Della Porta and Michael Keating clearly present all this in their reflections:

“In the positivist tradition, research aims at singling out causal explanations, on the assumption of a cause-effect relationship between variables. Researchers aim at an explanation that is structural and context-free, allowing generalization and the discovery of universal laws of behavior. (…) By contrast, interpretive/qualitative research aims at understanding events by discovering the meanings human beings attribute to their behavior and the external world. The focus is not on discovering laws about causal relationships between variables, but on understanding human nature, including the diversity of societies and cultures. (…) Cases are not broken down into variables but considered as interdependent wholes; generalization is achieved by assigning cases to classes and approximation them to ideal types. Context is considered as most important since research on human activity must consider an individual’s situational self-interpretation. Predictability is impossible since human beings change in time and space…” (Della Porta et al. 2008, p. 26 – 27).

In terms of the two types of analysis, emphasis should be put on the issue concerning the reliability of their results. This topic is extremely extensive, but here I will point out what I consider most important. With a view to the positivist concept, this issue is thoroughly dealt with by Karl Popper (Popper 2005) in his fundamental work The Logic of Scientific Discovery, as well as by other researchers from his period and later. In a nutshell, they introduced concepts such as ‘verification,’ ‘falsification,’ etc., which represent specific procedures. Through them, researchers can test the plausibility and reliability of their conclusions. By contrast, the hermeneutic analysis is unable to derive such rules, and the conclusions can be verified in a much more complex and sometimes lengthy way, which appears as a separate stage of the hermeneutic circle. Yordan Doykov (Doykov 2019) describes the latter in several separate steps.

The methodological pluralism in educational studies is a topic that requires lengthy and in-depth research. In the context of its aspect which I tried to address in this section, I could outline the relationship between the specifics of the analysis as one of the main scientific methods which both epistemological fields work with. This is illustrated in Figure 1.

Object of studyPositivist analysisSocial and historical contextHermeneutic analysis

Figure 1. Pluralism between positivist and hermeneutic analysis

I should point out the fact that, in a sense, the approaches of positivism and hermeneutics can also be regarded as determinants of the nature of the two main types of research in pedagogy – quantitative and qualitative. As I remarked above, causal relationships are sought not in one or several individual cases of manifestation, but in the majority of such cases. The common features of their manifestation in the object of study are sought. On the other hand, in hermeneutic research, the individual cases and the unique in them are more important than what is common. At the same time, it is difficult to completely distinguish between the two types of research. From this point of view, the methodology of pedagogy deals with a particular type of research, which combines the quantitative and qualitative approach. An example of this could be “an experimental study in which the experiment yields useful information about outcomes, but the additional collection of qualitative data develops a more in-depth understanding of how the experimental intervention actually worked” (Creswell 2012, p. 535). According to the same scholar:

“Mixed methods designs are procedures for collecting, analyzing, and mixing both quantitative and qualitative data in a single study or in a multiphase series of studies. In this process, you need to decide on the emphasis you will give to each form of data (priority), which form of data you will collect first (concurrent or sequential), how you will ‘mix’ the data (integrating or connecting), and whether you will use theory to guide the study (e.g. advocacy or social science theory)” (Creswell 2012, p. 22).

Based on presented point of view towards methodological basics of the experiment in pedagogy it can be formulated the following important conclusions some of which can be converted in object of future scientific researches:

– almost every contemporary pedagogical research is based on methodological pluralism which is due to specific status of pedagogy as a science and the processes of integration among different sciences and scientific spheres;

– most important role for methodological basics of pedagogical experiment has positivism and hermeneutics – the first concerns mainly quantitative and the second – qualitative researches;

– more often in contemporary pedagogical researches the scientists imply mixed method design. In Bulgarian scientific literature these types of researches are poorly studied.

It is important to be pointed out that analyses end conclusions made in this article only refer to basics of methodological pluralism in pedagogical researches in which the experiment is the main scientific method. More thoroughly investigation of this sphere can be realized in future scientific researches which could focus on specific cases of experiment in pedagogy.

Due to all of the above, the methodological pluralism at both the philosophical and technological level of conducting various educational studies is becoming more and more important for the development of pedagogy as a science.

REFERENCES

BARANETS, N., 2013. Filosofiya nauki. Ulyanovsk: Izdatelskopoligraficheskom tsentre GYaart.

BHATTACHERJEE, A., 2012. Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices. Tampa: University of South Florida. ISBN-13: 978-1475146127.

COHEN, L.; MANION, L.; MORRISON, K., 2007. Research methods in education. London: Routledge. ISBN 0-203-02905-4.

COMTE, A., 1896. Positive Philosophy. London: GEORGE BELL & SONS.

CRESWELL, J., 2012. Educational research. Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson. ISBN-10: 0-13-136739-0.

DELLA PORTA, D.; KEATING, M., 2008. Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: A pluralist perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN-13 978-0-511-42920-0.

DOYKOV, Yo., 2019. Metodologichesko konstruirane v socialniya analiz. Sofia: Paradigma [In Bulgarian]. ISBN 978-954-326-412-4.

GADAMER, H., 2004. Truth and method. London: Continuum Publishing Group. ISBN 08264 7697X.

KOSTADINOV, P., 2012. Humanitaristika i filosofska hermenevtika. Varna: Chernorizets Hrabar [In Bulgarian]. ISSN 1310-800 X.

MILL, J., 1882. A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive: Being a connected view of the principles of evidence, and the methods of scientific investigation. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers.

PENCHEV, D., 2022. Analytico-Synthetic Approach in Pedagogical Research: Stages of Realization. Pedagogicheski almanah, vol. XXIX, no. 2, pp. 157 – 181 [In Bulgarian]. ISSN 1310-358X.

POPPER, K., 2005. The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-203-99462-0.

RADEV, P., 2001. Vrazki na pedagogikata s filosofiyata, psihologiyata i logikata. Plovdiv: Sema 2001[In Bulgarian]. ISBN 954-8833-42-5.

RADEV, P., 2003. Predikativna pedagogika. Obekt, predmet i problemna orientatsiya na pedagogikata. Sistema na pedagogicheskite nauki. Pedagogika. Sofia: Hermes [In Bulgarian]. ISBN 954-459-890-1.

SOMEKH, B.; LEWIN, C., 2005. Research methods in the social sciences. London: Sage Publications. ISBN 0-7619-4401-X.

TSVETKOV, D., 1994. Obshta pedagogika. Filosofiya na obrazovanieto. Sofia: Veda Slovena – ZhG [In Bulgarian]. ISBN 954-8510.

WULF, C., 2003. Educational science. Hermeneutics, empirical research, critical theory. New York: Waxmann Münster. ISBN 3-8309-1259-5.

2025 година
Книжка 9s
Книжка 9
DEVELOPMENT OF DEMOCRATIC CULTURE THROUGH CONTENTS ABOUT THE ROMA IN CLASSROOM TEACHING – STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION

Aleksandra Trbojević, Biljana Jeremić, Hadži Živorad Milenović, Bojan Lazić

Книжка 8
КАТЕГОРИАЛНИ ИЗМЕРЕНИЯ НА ИНФОРМАЦИОННО-КОМУНИКАЦИОННИТЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ СЪС СОП

д.п.н Мира Цветкова-Арсова, Данка Щерева, Славина Лозанова, Маргарита Томова

Книжка 7
ВРЪЗКА НА СОЦИАЛНО-ЕМОЦИОНАЛНОТО С КОГНИТИВНОТО РАЗВИТИЕ В ПРИОБЩАВАЩА СРЕДА

Милен Замфиров, Маргарита Бакрачева, Емилия Евгениева

Книжка 6
КОГНИТИВНО РАЗВИТИЕ НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ, ОБХВАНАТИ В ПРИОБЩАВАЩОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Милен Замфиров, Емилия Евгениева, Маргарита Бакрачева

Книжка 5
COMPETENCE FOR SOCIAL PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICE: WHAT DO STUDENTS TELL US?

Maya Tcholakova, Marina Pironkova, Aleksandar Ranev, Yana Staneva

MULTIMODAL COMMUNICATION IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION CLASSES

Cristiana Lucretia Pop, Cristina Filip

Книжка 4s
GAMES IN FUNCTION OF DEVELOPMENT OF MULTIPLICATION SKILLS

Dasare Sylejmani, Vesna Makashevska, Jasmina Jovanovska

Книжка 4
ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА СИСТЕМИТЕ ЗА УПРАВЛЕНИЕ НА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО В КОНТЕКСТА НА ИНТЕРАКТИВНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Силвия Парушева, Борис Банков, Гергана Касабова, Петя Страшимирова

MILITARY AND SOCIAL THREATS AS DETERMINANTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONTEMPORARY UKRAINIAN HIGHER EDUCATION

Mykola Pantiuk, Tetiana Pantiuk, Nataliia Bakhmat, Olena Nevmerzhytska, Svitlana Ivakh

STEM ОБУЧЕНИЕ НА СТУДЕНТИ ПЕДАГОЗИ В ТРАНСДИСЦИПЛИНАРНА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА СРЕДА

Любен Витанов, Николай Цанев, Людмила Зафирова, Гергана Христова, Катерина Динкова, Калина Георгиева, Жорж Кюшев, Здравка Савчева

ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ И АНАЛИЗ НА НАГЛАСИТЕ НА СТУДЕНТИТЕ ПРИ ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА ГЕНЕРАТИВЕН ИНСТРУМЕНТ НА ИЗКУСТВЕН ИНТЕЛЕКТ

Николай Янев, Иглика Гетова, Теодора Христова, Ива Костадинова, Георги Димитров

Книжка 3
ДРУГИЯТ КАТО ЦЕННОСТ В УЧИЛИЩЕ

Александър Кръстев

Книжка 2
ASSESSMENTS OF TEACHERS AND PARENTS OF CHILDREN WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ON INCLUSION IN PRE-SCHOOL INSTITUTIONS

Zagorka Markov, Hadzi Zivorad Milenovic, Biljana Jeremic, Radmila Zecevic, Milica Pavlovic

Книжка 1s
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА СРЕДСТВАТА ЗА ДОПЪЛВАЩА И АЛТЕРНАТИВНА КОМУНИКАЦИЯ В ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИТЕ ИНСТИТУЦИИ В БЪЛГАРИЯ

. Неда Балканска, . Анна Трошева-Асенова, . Пенка Шапкова, Снежина Михайлова

USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING

Ekaterina Sofronieva, Christina Beleva, Galina Georgieva

Книжка 1
Скъпи читатели, автори, приятели на списание „Педагогика“,

В началото на 2025 година в първия брой на нашето списание „Педагогика“ бих искала от името на редакционната колегия и от мое име да Ви пожелая здраве, творческо вдъхновение и професионално удовлетворение от прино- са Ви към педагогическата наука и практика! Вярвам и се надявам, че списание „Педагоги- ка“ ще продължи да осигурява платформа за научен, обективен и откровен диалог, базиран на резултати от научни изследвания, за насто- ящето и бъдещето на обучението и образова- н

2024 година
Книжка 9s
Книжка 9
ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT OF VIDEO LEARNING RESOURCES IN SMALL-SCALE LEARNING SCENARIOS

César Córcoles, Laia Blasco-Soplon, Germán Cobo Rodríguez, Ana-Elena Guerrero-Roldán

Книжка 8
АНГАЖИРАНОСТ КЪМ УЧЕНЕ ЧРЕЗ ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА СМАРТ ТЕХНОЛОГИИТЕ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Кирилка Тагарева, Дора Левтерова-Гаджалова, Ваня Сивакова

Книжка 7
Книжка 6
Книжка 5s
ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВАТА НА СТАЖАНТСКАТА ПРАКТИКА ПРЕД СТУДЕНТИ – БЪДЕЩИ УЧИТЕЛИ

Илиана Петкова, Марияна Илиева, Владислава Станоева, Георги Чавдаров

Книжка 5
FEATURES OF SPEECH COMPREHENSION TRAINING OF CHILDREN WITH AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS

Maryna Branytska, Svitlana Myronova, Svitlana Mykhalska

OVERVIEW OF THE STEM EDUCATION IN ISRAEL

Aharon Goldreich, Elena Karashtranova

Книжка 4
НАГЛАСИ НА СТУДЕНТИТЕ КЪМ СМАРТ ТЕХНОЛОГИИТЕ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Дора Левтерова-Гаджалова, Кирилка Тагарева, Ваня Сивакова

PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT FOR YOUNG RESEARCHERS

Emina Vukašinović, Marija Veselinović, Milan Milikić

РОБОТИТЕ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО – ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА STEAM ИГРА

Мария Желязкова, Михаил Кожухаров, Даниела Кожухарова

Книжка 3s
Книжка 3
ATTITUDES AND EXPERIENCES OF THE PRESCHOOL TEACHERS IN THE APPLICATION OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION

Nataša Branković, Gordana Kozoderović, Biljana Jeremić, Danijela Petrović, Bojan Lazić, Slavica Karanović

ДИГИТАЛНИ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ПОДКРЕПА НА УЧЕНЕТО

Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова, Лъчезар Лазаров

PREPARATION OF FUTURE TEACHERS FOR ORGANISING A HEALTH-PRESERVING INCLUSIVE SPACE IN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

Nadiya Skotna, Tetiana Nadimyanova, Anna Fedorovych, Myroslava Sosiak, Oksana Yatsiv

Книжка 2s
Книжка 2
ОТ РИСУНКА – КЪМ СНИМКА

Камен Теофилов

Книжка 1s
Книжка 1
„ВТОРОТО“ БЪЛГАРСКО УЧИЛИЩЕ. ГЕНЕЗИСЪТ

Пенка Цонева, Бистра Мизова

2023 година
Книжка 9
EXPLORING THE NARRATIVE IDENTITY OF HUNGARIAN TEACHERS IN SLOVAKIA

Patrik Baka, Terézia Stredl, Kinga Horváth, Zsuzsanna Huszár, Melinda Nagy, Péter Tóth, András Németh

Книжка 8
A QUALITY “ONLINE” TEACHER – WHAT DO STUDENTS APPRECIATE AND VALUE IN TEACHERS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING?

Irena Golubović-Ilić, Ivana Ćirković-Miladinović, Nataša Vukićević

SUPPORT FOR THE INCLUSION OF ROMA CHILDREN THROUGH THE PROJECT TEACHING MODEL

Biljana Jeremić, Aleksandra Trbojević, Bojan Lazić, Gordana Kozoderović

TREND ANALYSIS OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCES OF SPORTS TEACHERS AND COACHES

Sergejs Capulis, Valerijs Dombrovskis, Svetlana Guseva, Alona Korniseva

Книжка 7
ЦЕННОСТЕН ПРОФИЛ НА УЧИТЕЛИТЕ В НАЦИОНАЛЕН КОНТЕКСТ

Цветан Давидков, Силвия Цветанска

Книжка 6s
MODELLING OF MARITIME CYBER SECURITY EDUCATION AND TRAINING

Gizem Kayisoglu, Pelin Bolat, Emre Duzenli

INTRODUCING THE USE OF CASE STUDIES METHODOLOGY IN TRAINING FOR SOFT SKILLS IN MARITIME UNIVERSITIES. THE ISOL-MET PROGRAM

Maria Lekakou, Helen Iakovaki, Dimitris Vintzilaios, Markella Gota, Giorgos Georgoulis, Thalia Vintzilaiou

THE ROLE OF MARITIME EDUCATION IN DIGITALIZATION

Kamelia Narleva, Yana Gancheva

Книжка 6
С МИСИЯ ЗА НАЦИОНАЛНА И КУЛТУРНА ИНДИВИДУАЛНОСТ

Надежда Кръстева, Йордан Колев

Книжка 5s
PREFACE

Nikola Vaptsarov Naval Academy is the oldest technical educational institution in Bulgaria. The Naval Academy is one of the symbols of Varna and Bulgaria in the world maritime community. Its history and achievements establish it as the most prestigious center for training of maritime specialists. At present, the Naval Academy trains specialists for the Navy and for the merchant marine in all areas of maritime life. Research and development conducted at the Naval Academy in Varna

A FAIR CONCERN ABOUT ECDIS

Nikolay Sozonov, Dilyan Dimitranov

DATA-DRIVEN LEARNING APPROACH TO MARITIME ENGLISH

Jana Kegalj, Mirjana Borucinsky, Sandra Tominac Coslovich

DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS THROUGH THE “CASE STUDY” TEACHING METHOD IN MARITIME ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING (MELT)

Tamila Mikeladze, Svetlana Rodinadze, Zurab Bezhanovi, Kristine Zarbazoia, Medea Abashidze, Kristine Iakobadze

MAXIMIZING STUDENTS’ LEARNING IN MARITIME ENGLISH ONLINE COURSE

Valentyna Kudryavtseva, Svitlana Barsuk, Olena Frolova

Книжка 5
Книжка 4s
Книжка 4
Книжка 3s
СПИРАЛАТА ОБЩЕСТВО – ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Иванка Шивачева-Пинеда

Книжка 3
ПРОЕКТНО БАЗИРАНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ ЗА СОЦИАЛНО-ЕМОЦИОНАЛНИ И ТЕХНОЛОГИЧНИ УМЕНИЯ ЧРЕЗ ПРОГРАМАТА „УМЕНИЯ ЗА ИНОВАЦИИ“

Галин Цоков, Александър Ангелов, Йоанна Минчева, Рени Димова, Мария Цакова

МЕДИЙНАТА ГРАМОТНОСТ И УЧИТЕЛИТЕ

Светла Цанкова, Стела Ангова, Мария Николова, Иван Вълчанов, Илия Вълков, Георги Минев

Книжка 2
INTONATION AND CHILDREN WITH EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL PROBLEMS

Katerina Zlatkova-Doncheva, Vladislav Marinov

Книжка 1
2022 година
Книжка 9
ТРАНСГРЕСИВНО-СИНЕРГИЧНО КАРИЕРНО РАЗВИТИЕ В „НЕФОРМАЛНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ“ В УНИВЕРСИТЕТА

д.п.н Яна Рашева-Мерджанова, Моника Богданова, Илиана Петкова

Книжка 8
INTEGRATING INTERCULTURAL EDUCATION IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOL CURRICULUM

Bujar Adili, Sonja Petrovska, Gzim Xhambazi

НАГЛАСИ НА БЪДЕЩИТЕ ДЕТСКИ УЧИТЕЛИ КЪМ STEM ПОДХОДА

Наталия Павлова, Михаела Тончева

Книжка 7
НАЦИОНАЛНАТА ИДЕЯ НА ПАИСИЙ ХИЛЕНДАРСКИ

Йордан Колев, Надежда Кръстева

Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ИВАН Д. ШИШМАНОВ – ЕВРОПЕИЗИРАНИЯТ БЪЛГАРИН

Надежда Кръстева, Йордан Колев

THE TECHNOLOGY OF DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNICATIVE CULTURE OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS

Mariia Oliiar, Nataliia Blahun, Halyna Bilavych, Nataliia Bakhmat, Tetyana Pantyuk

Книжка 4
TEACHERS’ATTITUDES BOUT TEACHING AND LEARNING MATHEMATICS

Aleksandra Mihajlović, Emina Kopas-Vukašinović, Vladimir Stanojević

EDUCATION 4.0 – THE CHANGE OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE LABOUR MARKET

Gergana Dimitrova, Blaga Madzhurova, Stefan Raychev, Dobrinka Stoyanova

Книжка 3s
DISTANCE LEARNING IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMICS

Baktybek Keldibekov, Shailoobek Karagulov

DIGITAL UNIVERSITIES: FEATURES AND KEY CHARACTERISTICS

Marina Skiba, Maktagali Bektemessov, Alma Turganbayeva

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
TWO-TIER MODEL OF TRAINING FUTURE TEACHERS FOR COACHING AT OUT-OF-SCHOOL INSTITUTIONS

Borys Savchuk, Tetyana Pantyuk, Natalia Sultanova, Halyna Bilavych, Mykola Pantyuk

Книжка 1
2021 година
Книжка 9
ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЕТО МЕЖДУ ФОРМАЛНОТО И НЕФОРМАЛНОТО ЗДРАВНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Вержиния Боянова, Константин Теодосиев, Берджухи Йорданова

FORMATION OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE OF ASSISTANT TEACHER OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN SECONDARY EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

Vladyslava Liubarets, Nataliia Bakhmat, Olena Matviienko, Oksana Tsykhmeistruk, Inna Feltsan

Книжка 8
Книжка 7s
CONCEPT OF PRESENT PRACTICE IN CHOOSING OF OPTIMAL NUMBER OF TUGS

Rino Bošnjak, Zvonimir Lušić, Filip Bojić, Dario Medić

S-101 CHARTS, DATABASE TABLES FOR S-101 CHARTS, AUTONOMOUS VESSEL

Vladimir Brozović, Danko Kezić, Rino Bošnjak, Filip Bojić

INFLUENCE OF HYDRO-METEOROLOGICAL ELEMENTS ON THE SHIP MANOEUVRING IN THE CITY PORT OF SPLIT

Zvonimir Lušić, Nenad Leder, Danijel Pušić, Rino Bošnjak

MEETING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS – EXPERIENCE FROM THE LARGEST SHIPPING COMPANIES

Katarina Balić, Helena Ukić Boljat, Gorana Jelić Mrčelić, Merica Slišković

OPTIMISING THE REFERENCE POINT WITHIN A JOURNAL BEARING USING LASER ALIGNMENT

Ty Aaron Smith, Guixin Fan, Natalia Nikolova, Kiril Tenekedjiev

REVIEW OF THE CURRENT INCREASE OF NOISE UNIT COST VALUES IN TRANSPORT

Luka Vukić, Ivan Peronja, Mihaela Bukljaš, Alen Jugović

TARGET DETECTION FOR VISUAL COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM

Miro Petković, Danko Kezić, Igor Vujović, Ivan Pavić

NEW RESULTS FOR TEACHING SHIP HANDLING USING FAST TIME SIMULATION

Knud Benedict, Michèle Schaub, Michael Baldauf, Michael Gluch, Matthias Kirchhoff, Caspar Krüger

POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF ELECTRICALY DRIVEN FERRY, CASE STUDY

Tina Perić, Ladislav Stazić, Karlo Bratić

SITUATIONAL AWARENESS – KEY SAFETY FACTOR FOR THE OFFICER OF THE WATCH

Hrvoje Jaram, Pero Vidan, Srđan Vukša, Ivan Pavić

Книжка 7
INCLUSIVE INTELLIGENCE

Aleksandar Krastev

EDUCATION OF MORAL CULTURE OF STUDENT YOUTH IN THE CONDITIONS OF POLYCULTURAL SPACE

Natalia Bondarenko, Yevhen Rozdymakha, Lyudmila Oderiy, Anatoly Rozdymakha, Dilyana Arsova

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN KOSOVO – RESEARCH OF TRAINING PROGRAMS AND TESTS

Bekim Samadraxha, Veton Alihajdari, Besim Mustafa, Ramë Likaj

Книжка 6s
EVALUATION OF CRUISER TRAFFIC VARIABLES IN SEAPORTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA

Maja Račić, Katarina Balić, Mira Pavlinović, Antonija Mišura

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CONTRACTS FOR MARITIME TRANSPORT SERVICES. CHAIN OF CHARTER PARTIES

Svetlana Dimitrakieva, Ognyan Kostadinov, Christiana Atanasova

THE LIGHTSHIP MASS CALCULATION MODEL OF A MERCHANT SHIP BY EMPIRICAL METHODS

Vedran Slapničar, Katarina Zadro, Viktor Ložar, Ivo Ćatipović

ON EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN MARITIME COMMUNICATIONS AND THE GMDSS DURING THE COVID-19

Chavdar Alexandrov, Grozdyu Grozev, Georgi Dimitrov, Avgustin Hristov

AIR POLLUTANT EMISSION MEASUREMENT

Nikola Račić, Branko Lalić, Ivan Komar, Frane Vidović, Ladislav Stazić

ASSESSMENT OF LNG BUNKERING ACCIDENTS

Peter Vidmar, Andrej Androjna

EGR OPERATION INFLUENCE ON THE MARINE ENGINE EFFICIENCY

Delyan Hristov, Ivan Ivanov, Dimitar Popov

THE MEASUREMENT OF EXHAUST GAS EMISSIONS BY TESTO 350 MARITIME – EXHAUST GAS ANALYZER

Bruna Bacalja, Maja Krčum, Tomislav Peša, Marko Zubčić

PROPELLER LOAD MODELLING IN THE CALCULATIONS OF MARINE SHAFTING TORSIONAL VIBRATIONS

Nenad Vulić, Karlo Bratić, Branko Lalić, Ladislav Stazić

TECHNICAL DIAGNOSTICS OF MARINE EQUIPMENT WITH PSEUDO-DISCRETE FEATURES

Guixin Fan, Natalia Nikolova, Ty Smith, Kiril Tenekedjiev

CONTRIBUTION TO THE REDUCTION OF THE SHIP’S SWITCHBOARD BY APPLYING SENSOR TECHNOLOGY

Nediljko Kaštelan, Marko Zubčić, Maja Krčum, Miro Petković

THE STAND FOR FIN DRIVES ENERGY TESTING

Andrzej Grządziela, Marcin Kluczyk, Tomislav Batur

INTRODUCTION OF 3D PRINTING INTO MARINE ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION – A CASE STUDY

Ivica Kuzmanić, Igor Vujović, Zlatan Kulenović, Miro Petković

SHIPYARD CRANE MODELING METHODS

Pawel Piskur, Piotr Szymak, Bartosz Larzewski

Книжка 6
TEACHERS' PERSPECTIVE ON THE EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF ONLINE TEACHING

Julien-Ferencz Kiss, Florica Orțan, Laurențiu Mândrea

Книжка 5
ФИДАНА ДАСКАЛОВА ЗА ПЕДАГОГИКАТА

Маргарита Колева, Йордан Колев

Книжка 4
Книжка 3
НЕВРОДИДАКТИКА

Наталия Витанова

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
BULGARIAN SCHOOL – SHOWCASE OF IDENTITY

Veska Gyuviyska, Nikolay Tsankov

2020 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
EDUCATIONAL REASONS FOR EARLY SCHOOL DROP-OUT

Maria Teneva, Zlatka Zhelyazkova

Книжка 7s
TEACHING CHALLENGES IN SPORTS EDUCATION DURING THE PANDEMIC COVID-19

Evelina Savcheva, Galina Domuschieva-Rogleva

THE DIFFERENCES IN STUDENTS’ATTITUDES ABOUT ONLINE TEACHING DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Aleksić Veljković Aleksandra, Slađana Stanković, Irena Golubović-Ilić, Katarina Herodek

ONLINE EDUCATION DURING PANDEMIC, ACCORDING TO STUDENTS FROM TWO BULGARIAN UNIVERSITIES

Antoaneta Getova¹, Eleonora Mileva², Boryana Angelova-Igova²

Книжка 7
Книжка 6
TEACHERS ATTITUDES ABOUT INTEGRATED APPROACH IN TEACHING

Emina Kopas-Vukašinović, Aleksandra Mihajlović, Olivera Cekić-Jovanović

Книжка 5
КОНЦЕПТУАЛНИ МОДЕЛИ ЗА РАЗРАБОТВАНЕ НА ПОЗНАВАТЕЛНИ ОНЛАЙН ИГРИ В ОБЛАСТТА НА КУЛТУРНОТО НАСЛЕДСТВО

Детелин Лучев, Десислава Панева-Мариновa, Радослав Павлов, Гита Сенка, Лилия Павлова

Книжка 4
A CONTINUUM OF APPROACHES TO SCHOOL INSPECTIONS: CASES FROM EUROPE

Rossitsa Simeonova, Yonka Parvanova, Martin Brown, Sarah Gardezi, Joe O’Hara, Gerry McNamara, Laura del Castillo Blanco, Zacharoula Kechri, Eleni Beniata

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2019 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НА БЪДЕЩЕТО

Наталия Витанова

Книжка 7
RISK FACTORS FOR EARLY SCHOOL LEAVING IN BULGARIA

Elena Lavrentsova, Petar Valkov

Книжка 6
Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
LEARNING MATURITY

Alina Gîmbuță, Daniela-Carmen Berințan, Marijana Mikulandra, Krzysztof Kij, Katja Sivka

Книжка 2
ДЕТЕТО И ПЕДАГОГИКАТА

Яна Рашева-Мерджанова

Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ КОЛЕГИ,

На добър час!

УЧЕНИЧЕСКО САМОУПРАВЛЕНИЕ

Бисерка Михалева

2018 година
Книжка 9
ПРАВАТА НА ДЕТЕТО ПРЕЗ ПОГЛЕДА НА СТУДЕНТИ ПЕДАГОЗИ

Йорданка Николова, Даниела Рачева

Книжка 8
СПОДЕЛЕНО МНЕНИЕ

Йосиф Нунев

Книжка 7
РАДОСТТА ОТ ОБЩУВАНЕТО НА ЧУЖД ЕЗИК В ДЕТСТВОТО

Екатерина Софрониева, Христина Белева

ПРОФ. Д-Р ЕЛЕНА РУСИНОВА-БАХУДЕЙЛА

Розалина Енгелс-Критидис

Книжка 6
ПОЗИТИВНА УЧЕБНА СРЕДА

Валентина Шарланова

SENIOR CITIZENS’ EXISTENTIAL NEEDS AND EDUCATION FOR THE MEANING OF LIFE

Joanna Łukasik, Norbert Pikuła, Katarzyna Jagielska

Книжка 5
ПАРАДИГМАТА СЕМИОТИКА – ЕЗИК – ДЕТЕ ПРИ 6 – 7-ГОДИШНИТЕ

Жоржетина Атанасова, Любимка Габрова

Книжка 4
ДЕТСКИ КОНФЕРЕНЦИИ

Боряна Иванова

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
СЪВРЕМЕННИ МЕТАМОРФОЗИ НА ВЗАИМООТНОШЕНИЯТА В ДЕТСКАТА ГРУПА

Веселина Иванова, Виолета Кърцелянска-Станчева

SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES AS SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS

Emilj Sulejmani, Shikjerije Sulejmani

ОТНОСНО УСЕТА ЗА БРОЕНЕ

Петър Петров, Мима Трифонова

Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ КОЛЕГИ И ПРИЯТЕЛИ

Емилия Василева, главен редактор

ДОБРИ ПРАКТИКИ „ПАРТНЬОРСТВО РОДИТЕЛИ – УЧИЛИЩЕ“

Мехмед Имамов, Калинка Гайтанинчева

2017 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
ЧЕТЯЩИЯТ СТУДЕНТ, ЧЕТЯЩОТО ДЕТЕ – ЕДНО МАЛКО ПРОЗОРЧЕ, ЕДНА ВЕЛИЧЕСТВЕНА ГЛЕДКА

Мариана Мандева, Боряна Туцева, Габриела Николова, Цветелина Ковачева

Кампания на Институт за български език – БАН и вестник „Аз-буки“

на Институт за български език – БАН, и вестник „Аз-буки“

ЕДИН ТИП СЛОЖНИ НАРЕЧИЯ

Марияна Цибранска-Костова

СВАТБА

Палмира Легурска

Книжка 7
ДИДАКТИЧЕСКИ КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТИ

Нели Митева, Наталия Витанова

Книжка 6
АБВ ПОИСКА … ИЛИ АБВ ПОИСКАХА…?

Цветелина Георгиева

Книжка 5
НОВА И ПОЛЕЗНА КНИГА

Йонка Първанова

Книжка 4
Кампания на Института за български език – БАН и вестник „Аз-буки“

на Института за български език – БАН, и вестник „Аз-буки“

ИМЕНИЦИ И ИМЕННИЦИ

Ивелина Стоянова

НЕ МОГА ДА НЕ НЕДОВОЛСТВАМ

Ивелина Стоянова

ОБРЪЩЕНИЕ ИЛИ ОБРАЩЕНИЕ?

Диана Благоева

ОЩЕ ВЕДНЪЖ ЗА ГЛАВНИТЕ БУКВИ

Мая Влахова-Ангелова

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
ПРОБЛЕМИ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВИ В РАЗВИТИЕТО НА ХУДОЖЕСТВЕНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ У НАС ПРЕЗ ПОГЛЕДА НА ДЕТСКИЯ И НАЧАЛНИЯ УЧИТЕЛ

Теодора Власева, Даниела Гирджева-Валачева, Мария Калоферова, Найден Младенов, Илияна Шотлекова

Книжка 1
ФАКТОРИ ЗА УСПЕШНО ПРИЛАГАНЕ НА СМЕСЕНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова, Лъчезар Лазаров

2016 година
Книжка 9
ВНИМАВАЙКИ В КАРТИНКАТА

Ивелина Стоянова

Книжка 8
Книжка 7
Кампания на Института за български език – БАН и в. „Аз-буки“

на Института за български език – БАН, и в. „Аз-буки“

ПРАВО В ДЕСЕТКАТА

Ивелина Стоянова

ЗДРАВЕЙТЕ, ЗАПЕТАИ!

Илияна Кунева

ЗА ЦИФРИТЕ И ЧИСЛАТА

Светлозара Лесева

Книжка 6
УЧИЛИЩЕ ЗА ЧЕТЕНЕ

Петя Георгиева, Христина Димитрова

Кампания на Института за български език – БАН и в. „Аз Буки“

на Института за български език – БАН, и в. „Аз Буки“

ДОШЛА ЛИ Е ИНСПЕКТОРЪТ?

Ванина Сумрова

ДА ВИ Е СЛАДКО!

Иво Панчев

ЩЕ ТЕ ЧАКАМ В/НА ЦЕНТЪРА

Илияна Гаравалова

КЪЩА-МУЗЕЙ ИЛИ КЪЩА МУЗЕЙ?

Ивелина Стоянова

КОЙ Е ПО-, ПÒ, НАЙ-?

Мария Тодорова

ТЪРСИ МЕ ПРОДАВАЧКА

Светлозара Лесева

ПРАВО В ДЕСЕТКАТА

Ивелина Стоянова

ПРОФ.Д.П.Н. СТОЯНКА ЖЕКОВА

Редколегия на сп. „Педагогика“

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
AN OVERVIEW ON FORMAL SCHOOLING SYSTEM IN SEVEN COUNTRIES

Alina Gîmbută, Maria Fili, Cemile Yavuz, Radmila Jeřábková, Nikolina Ratković, Paulo Manuel Oliveira Mengo de Abreu, Chiara Sega

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
IN MEMORIAM

На 10.12.2015 г. ни напусна нашият колега и приятел проф. д-р Иван Пет ков Иванов. Той беше уважаван учен и експерт в областта на педагогическите науки – автор на 10 монографии, 8 учебника, 10 учебни помагала, 6 студии и над 100 статии в специализирани периодич- ни издания и научни сборници; участник в 28 между- народни и национални проекта; председател и член на експертни групи към НАОА, член на редакционната ко- легия на сп. „Педагогика“. Проф. д-р Иван Иванов беше уважаван и оби

2015 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
Книжка 7
ДИСКУСИЯТА В УРОКА ПО ЛИТЕРАТУРА

Огняна Георгиева-Тенева

Книжка 6
ГОТОВНОСТ ЗА ОГРАМОТЯВАНЕ

Екатерина Чернева

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
Книжка 2
ПРОБЛЕМИ НА СОЦИАЛНАТА АДАПТАЦИЯ НА ПЪТУВАЩИ УЧЕНИЦИ ОТ МАЛКИ НАСЕЛЕНИ МЕСТА\(^{1)}\)

Траян Попкочев, Бонка Гергинова, Тереза Карамангалова

ТУРНИР ПО КАНАДСКА БОРБА

Д. Евтимова, Е. Павлова, И. Радославова и Б. Иванов

ДЕТСКА ЛЯТНА ОЛИМПИАДА

Нели Бъчварова, Десислава Дургова

Книжка 1
ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: THEORY AND REALITY

Inna Leonidovna Fedotenko

2014 година
Книжка 9
ДА ЗАПАЛИШ ИСКРАТА

Дафинка Самарджиева

НА УЧИЛИЩЕ – С УСМИВКА!

Снежана Якимова

УЧИТЕЛЯТ – ЕТАЛОН ЗА ФОРМИРАНЕ НА ДЕТСКАТА ЛИЧНОСТ

Катя Коруджийска, Янка Маринкова

Книжка 8
Книжка 7
ЗАЕДНО МОЖЕМ ПОВЕЧЕ

Диана Смиленова

Книжка 6-bad
ЗА ДУМАТА КАТО СРЕДСТВО ЗА ОБЩУВАНЕ

ЗА ДУМАТА КАТО СРЕДСТВО ЗА ОБЩУВАНЕ

УСПЕШНИЯТ УЧИТЕЛ – МЕЖДУ ПРОФЕСИОНАЛНАТА НОРМА И СТРАСТТА ДА ПРЕПОДАВАШ

Проф. д-р Ангел Петров е преподавател по методика на обучението по български език в СУ „Св. Климент Охридски“. Ръководител е на най- старата катедра по методика на филологически- те дисциплини в страната – Катедрата по ме-

Книжка 6
Книжка 5
LE PROJET PÉDAGOGIQUE, SOURCE DE MOTIVATION DANS L’ENSEIGNEMENT ET L’APPRENTISSAGE DU FLE

THE EDUCATIONAL PROJECT, MEANS OF MOTIVATION IN TEACHING AND LEARNING FLE

LA PÉDAGOGIE DU PROJET ET LA MOTIVATION DES ÉLÈVES POUR L’APPRENTISSAGE DU FRANÇAIS

PROJECT PEDAGOGY AND PUPILS’ MOTIVATION IN LEARNING FRENCH

Книжка 4
КАЖДЫЙ ДЛЯ МЕНЯ УЧИТЕЛЬ

Ш.А.Амонашвили

Книжка 3
АНТОАНЕТА ЙОВЧЕВА (1952 – 2014)

След трудна борба с тежката болест ни напусна един добър и мил човек, една светла личност – Анто- анета Йовчева, нашата обичана колежка Тони. Нейните колеги и приятели, многобройните автори и сътрудници на сп. „Начално образование“ и на сп. „Педагогика“ ще запазят завинаги спомена за нейната приветлива усмивка, за нейната отзивчивост и преда- ност към работата, за нейната широка култура и стре- меж към познание, към развитие. Родена на 20 март 1952 г. в София в интелигентно се- мей

Книжка 2
ПОСТМОДЕРНИЗЪМ И ВЪЗПИТАНИЕ

Клавдия Сапунджиева

ДЕТСКИ УНИВЕРСИТЕТИ

Боряна Иванова

ПРОФ. Д-Р ЕЛКА ПЕТРОВА

Златка Петрова

МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЙ ЦЕНТР ГУМАННОЙ ПЕДАГОГИКИ

Международният център „Хуманна педагогика“ организира XIII педаго- гически четения в периода 20 – 23.03.2014 г. в гр.Тбилиси, Грузия. Форумът се организира със съдействието на грузинското правителство. „Учителят“ е темата, която ще обедини участниците: учители, експерти, родители, универ- ситетски преподаватели, представители на педагогическата общност от мно- го страни, за да се осъществи дискусия за мисията на съвременния учител в съвременния образователен контекст. Ръководството на

Книжка 1
ОСНОВНИ ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКИ НА МОБИЛНОТО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова, Лъчезар Лазаров

2013 година
Книжка 9
УЧИТЕЛИ ВЪЗРОЖДЕНЦИ В ТЪРНОВО

Венка Кутева-Цветкова

Книжка 8
ДИМИТЪР ДОНЧЕВ – С ВЪЗХИТА ЗА БЪЛГАРСКИЯ УЧИТЕЛ

100 ГОДИНИ ОТ РОЖДЕНИЕТО НА ДИМИТЪР ЕВСТАТИЕВ ДОНЧЕВ (5.10.1913 – 15.02.1997)

Книжка 7
„СЛЪНЦЕТО“ НА ВЪЗПИТАТЕЛНАТА СИСТЕМА В ТВУ – РАКИТОВО

85 ГОДИНИ ОТ РОЖДЕНИЕТО НА АНГЕЛ УЗУНОВ (1928 – 1999)

ЦЕННОСТИ И ДУХОВНО-НРАВСТВЕНО РАЗВИТИЕ НА МАЛКИЯ УЧЕНИК

Марияна Ешкенази, Гергана Фиданова, Марияна Вишева, Цветанка Годжилова

МАЛКИЯТ УЧЕНИК ЧЕТЕ

Марияна Механджиева Венета Велева

С БАБА И ДЯДО В КЛАС

Цветелин Горанов, Таня Илиева, Цветанка Берова, Нели Иванова, Борка Бончева

РОД РОДА НЕ ХРАНИ, НО ТЕЖКО МУ, КОЙТО ГО НЯМА!

Диляна Вачкова Евелина Димитрова

ДА ПОМОГНЕМ НА ДЕЦАТА ДА ОТВОРЯТ СЪРЦАТА СИ

Иванка Дебелушина, Нина Маврикова

ДОБРОТО Е У ВСЕКИ

Мария Наскова

ОТЛИЧЕН ПЕДАГОГ, ПСИХОЛОГ И ПСИХОТЕРАПЕВТ

ДОЦ. СВЕТОСЛАВ СТАМЕНОВ (1939 – 2013)

Книжка 6
ТЕОРЕТИКО-ПРИЛОЖНИ ПРОБЛЕМИ НА КОНСТРУИРАНЕТО НА ТЕСТ ЗА НАЦИОНАЛНО ВЪНШНО ОЦЕНЯВАНЕ ПО „ЧОВЕКЪТ И ОБЩЕСТВОТО“ ЗА 4. КЛАС (2013)

Ваня Петрова, Цонка Каснакова, Мариан Делчев Жана Минчева Радостина Стоянова, Рада Димитрова Мария Темникова

MEDIA IN PRESCHOOL AGE OF CHILD’S LIFE

Sonja Petrovska Jadranka Bocvarova

Книжка 5
ШАЛВА АЛЕКСАНДРОВИЧ АМОНАШВИЛИ – УЧИТЕЛ ОТ БЪДЕЩЕТО

В сложното битие на науката и метамор- фозите на социалната реалност, неотменими и общовалидни остават само най-стойностни- те постижения и безспорни истини, които не само маркират и остойностяват територията на човешко познание, но извисяват самия чо- век, поддържат неговата вяра в доброто, под- хранват чувството му за собствена значимост, укрепват неговия дух. Приемайки извечните послания на класи- ческата философско-педагогическа мъдрост и дълбоко обвързан с педагогическата р

МАНИФЕСТ ГУМАННОЙ ПЕДАГОГИКИ

Преамбула 25 лет тому назад группа учителей новаторов провозгласила манифест „Пе- дагогика сотрудничества“ (Переделкино, 1986 год). В последующие годы были опубликованы отчеты встреч учителей новаторов, в которых рассматри- вались разные аспекты педагогики сотрудничества: „Демократизация лично- сти“ (Цинандали, Телавский район, Грузия, 1987 год), „Методика обновления“ (Москва, 1988 год), „Войдем в новую школу“ (Краснодарский край, 1988 год). Идеи педагогики сотрудничества воодушевленно

ПОРТФОЛИОТО НА УЧЕНИКА КАТО ПРОЦЕС НА САМОПОЗНАНИЕ

Радка Топалска Емилия Вълкова, Албена Атанасова

ДОПИРНИ СВЕТОВЕ

Албена Димитрова, Стилияна Гронева

ПРЕДИ ГОДИНА И СЕГА

Веселка Аршинкова

Книжка 4
СВЕЩЕНИК ГЕОРГИ МАРИНОВ ПОЛУГАНОВ – ОСНОВАТЕЛЯТ НА УЧИЛИЩЕТО И ПЪРВИЯТ УЧИТЕЛ В ПОЛИКРАЙЩЕ

Георги Георгиев Трифонка Попниколова Марияна Георгиева–Гроссе

ЕВРОПЕЙСКИ ПРИКАЗКИ

Светла Попова

Книжка 3
ДА ОПАЗИМ ДЕТСКОТО ЗДРАВЕ!

Мая Топалова, Симона Пейчева

КАК ДА ОТГЛЕДАМЕ МАЛЪК ПРИРОДОЛЮБИТЕЛ?

Мадлена Николова Ани Цветкова

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
ИЗКУСТВОТО ЗА ПРЕВЕНЦИЯ НА АГРЕСИВНОТО ПОВЕДЕНИЕ НА ДЕЦАТА

Евгения Миланова Виолета Николова Величка Радева

ПРИЯТЕЛСТВОТО В ЖИВОТА НА ДЕТЕТО

Даниела Димитрова, Красимира Василева

ПРЕДАЙ НАТАТЪК

Вилдан Мехмедова

2012 година
Книжка 9
ПЕДАГОГЪТ – РИЦАР НА ДЕТСТВОТО

Януш Корчак бе написал, че животът на великите хора е като легендите: труден, но красив. И се оказва пророчески прав, сякаш е писал за себе си! Наследник на семейство с богата духовна култура и традиции, останал отрано без баща, той не просто се справя с несгодите на сирачеството, но развива у себе си три могъщи извора на живот: любов към свободата и справедливостта, страст към знанието и творчеството, отдаденост на децата и тяхното щастие. Лекарят Корчак лекува децата и душите им. Безплатн

ЯНУШ КОРЧАК – ВЕЛИК ХУМАНИСТ И ПЕДАГОГ

„Със сила и мощ поведох своя живот, който беше привидно неподреден, самотен и чужд. За син избрах идеята да служа на детето и неговото дело. Привидно загубих.“ Бе лекар, писател, мислител. Бе философ, учен, моралист. Издател. Възпи- тател и педагог. Бе герой. Бе скромен. Във всяка от тези области той има изключителни постижения. В течение на по- вече от четиридесет години работи като педагог и писател. Четиридесет години безкористно служене на слабите и беззащитните. Създава съвременна кон

ЕВОЛЮЦИЯ НА ПРАВАТА НА ДЕТЕТО

„Детето има право на сериозно отношение към проблемите му, на справедливото им решаване.“

THE KORCZAK’S RIGHT TO SOCIAL PARTICIPATION OF CHILDREN THE CITIZENSHIP OF CHILDREN

A speech by Marek Michalak, the Ombudsman for Children, given during the seminar„The Polish-Israeli pioneer in the fi eld of human rights, Janusz Korczak (1879–1942) and today’s Convention on Children’s Rights as the part of the international law“, Geneva, the 6 of June 2009

ЗА ДЕТЕТО, ДЕТСТВОТО ИЛИ НАУКА ЗА НЕГО?

В памет на Януш Корчак – по повод 70 г. от неговата смърт и 100 г. от създаването на „Дом за сираци“ във Варшава Албена Чавдарова

Книжка 8
CHANGES IN UNIVERSITY TEACHING – THE ROAD FROM KNOWLEDGE TO COMPETENCIES

Slađana Anđelković Zorica Stanisavljević Petrović

ДОСТОЕН ЖИВОТ, ОТДАДЕН НА ПРОСВЕЩЕНИЕТО… ПРОФ. СТОЙКА ЗДРАВКОВА – ЕДИН СЪВРЕМЕНЕН БУДИТЕЛ НА 70 ГОДИНИ

Неуморна и взискателна! Енергична и всеотдай- на! Работохолик и перфекционист! Това е проф. д-р Стойка Здравкова! Не е за вярване, че в началото на ноември 2012 година навърши 70 години. И не е слу- чайно това, че тази светла дата е непосредствено бли- зо до Деня на будителите. А това, че проф . Здравкова е съвременен български будител, е толкова безспорно и видимо! 70–годишнината ù е един чудесен повод ретрос- пективно да си припомним и проследим най-значи-

Книжка 7
ОЧАКВАНА И ПОЛЕЗНА

Емилия Василева

Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ЦЕННО ПОМАГАЛО ЗА ПСИХОЛОЗИ И ПЕДАГОЗИ (Надежден инструмент за диагностициране смисъла на живота)

Любен Десев Минчев, Борис. Тест на Дж. Крумбъг и Л. Махолик за смисъл в живота. Българска версия. Варна, ВСУ „Черноризец Храбър“,

ГЕОРГИ MАВРОВ ЖИВОТ, ОТДАДЕН НА НАУКАТА И ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Така най-общо, но и най-точно можем да охарак- теризираме дейността на ст. н. с. д-р Георги Петков Мавров. Той ни напусна неочаквано в края на април т.г. И до последния си ден не преставаше да се вълнува от проблемите на образованието. Споделяше инте- ресни мисли относно предстоящото приемане на За- кона за образованието. Пестелив на думи, но щедър на дела – това ясно проличава от неговата богата би- ография.

Книжка 4
ОЩЕ ЕДНА ИДЕЯ

Галина Стоянова

Книжка 3
С ИНОВАТИВЕН ПОГЛЕД КЪМ ЛИЧНОСТТА НА ДЕТЕТО

Маргарита Абрашева Любимка Габрова

БИЗНЕС ОБУЧЕНИЕ В ДЕТСКАТА ГРАДИНА

Красимира Костова Петя Драгоданова

ДЕТСКАТА БЕЗОПАСНОСТ

Любимка Габрова

БАБА ПРИКАЗКИ РАЗКАЗВА... (МИКС ОТ ПРИКАЗКИ)

Кева Захариева, Мария Мичева

Книжка 2
ДЕТЕ ПЪТУВА В АВТОМОБИЛА

Красимира Михайлова

ПРОТИВОПОСТАВЯНЕ

Пюрвя Ердниев, Б. Ердниев

ЗДРАВКА НОВАКОВА – ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛ И ТВОРЕЦ

Седемдесетгодишният юбилей е вълнуващ повод да проследим трудния, богат и съдържателен професионално-творчески път на доц. д-р Здравка Новакова, да под- чертаем нейната важна роля за утвърждаване на дидактика на математиката като

IN MEMORIAM Иван Марев

Напусна ни проф. Иван Марев – философ, педагог, демократ, родолюбец. В далечната 1975 г., зареден с енергия, пълен с идеи, той създаде в Техническия

Книжка 1
ДЕЛЕГИРАНЕ НА ПРАВА ЧРЕЗ КОМИСИИТЕ В ДЕТСКАТА ГРАДИНА

Маргарита Абрашева Политиката, наречена управление на качеството, не е самоцел, нито поредна обра- зователна „мода“. Тя е практически необходима за поддържане от директора на учеб- ното заведение на един привлекателен образ в условията на конкуренция на пазара на учебни заведения. Това се отнася най-вече за детските градини. Политиката на упра- вление на качеството съдържа недостатъчно използван ресурс, включително за спечел- ване и запазване доверието на потребителя – родителите на децата,

ИНОВАЦИОННИ И ИНТЕРАКТИВНИ МЕТОДИ В КВАЛИФИКАЦИОННАТА ДЕЙНОСТ НА ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИЯ КОЛЕКТИВ

Стоилка Ташева, Севда Лукайчева Развиващото се с динамични темпове общество в днешно време налага необ- ходимостта от иновационни промени в областта на образованието. И в предучи- лищната педагогика все по-често се търсят алтернативни педагогически техноло- гии както за възпитанието и обучението на децата, така и при провеждането на квалификационната дейност на самите педагози. Използването на интерактивните методи дава възможност да се възлагат за- дачи, които предполагат съвместна работа,

НА УЛИЦАТА Е ОПАСНО

Таня Янчева, Зоя Кацарова