Педагогика

https://doi.org/10.53656/ped2025-9s.07

2025/9s, стр. 105 - 123

WHAT CAN A MIXED-METHODS APPROACH TELL US ABOUT DIGITAL COMPETENCES IN PHYSICS TEACHER TRAINING?

Ivelina Kotseva
OrcID: 0000-0003-2932-7069
E-mail: iva_georgieva@phys.uni-sofia.bg
Faculty of Physics
Sofia University “St Kliment Ohridski’’
Sofia Bulgaria
Maya Gaydarova
OrcID: 0000-0003-1552-1039
E-mail: mayag@phys.uni-sofia.bg
Faculty of Physics
Sofia University “St Kliment Ohridski’’
Sofia Bulgaria

Резюме: This study employs an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design to examine differences in digital competencies among university lecturers at Sofia University. The first stage involves a quantitative analysis of survey data from 90 professors across various faculties and six professors from the Faculty of Physics, using the Chi-square test to compare empirical and theoretical distributions. The second stage consists of structured interviews with the six Faculty of Physics lecturers to explore reasons behind these differences. Results show that physics lecturers primarily develop digital competencies through self-study and peer collaboration rather than formal training. Statistically significant differences emerged in three areas: (1) computational thinking and professional development, (2) self-regulated and collaborative learning with digital technologies, and (3) ethical and responsible use of digital resources. Findings suggest a need for a systematic approach to digital competency development across faculties, with physics lecturers showing distinct engagement patterns.

Ключови думи: DigCompEdu; digital competences; mix-methods; physics teacher training

Introduction

Digital competencies are core professional skills for physics teachers. They are developed during both initial university training and through postgraduate courses and practical experience in schools. The integration of digital competencies during university training facilitates a smoother connection with other pedagogical skills essential for teachers’ full professional development.

According to a European Commission report (Ferrari 2012), digital competence encompasses a set of knowledge, skills, and attitudes – including abilities, strategies, values, and awareness – required for effectively using ICT (Information and Communication Technology) and digital media to: (1) Perform tasks; (2) Solve problems; (3) Communicate; (4) Manage information; (4) Collaborate; (5) Create and share content; (7) Build knowledge in a way that is effective, efficient, appropriate, critical, creative, autonomous, flexible, ethical, and reflective across various domains such as work, leisure, participation, learning, socializing, consuming, and empowerment.

Digital tools are also successfully used to assess learners’ achievements in reflective activities and self-assessment (Miliou et al. 2024). Self-assessment is a key competency for the 21st century (Greenstein 2012). Students should learn to apply self-assessment practically, a process that teachers should actively encourage within formative assessment practices (Hughes & Thompson 2022).

There are various frameworks for defining digital competences of teachers, such as the National Educational Technology Standards (NETS-T) developed by the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE)1, the UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers (2018)2, Claro et al. (2018), and DiKoLAN (Thoms et al. 2022). Efforts are underway at various levels to standardize and classify the digital skills of educators. For example, the UNESCO Competency Framework outlines six aspects: understanding the role of IT technologies in learning, in assessment, and in pedagogical practice; mastery of technological tools (hardware and software); planning and organizing the learning process; and engaging in professional development.

Selected for our research purposes, the DigCompEdu European Reference Framework (2017) defines general and universal digital competences relevant to various types of teachers, both in schools and universities (Punie & Redecker 2017). According to Redecker and Punie, being a digitally competent teacher means helping students develop their own digital competence. This framework outlines a model of digital competence with 22 competencies divided into six categories:

Area 1: Professional Engagement (1.1 Organizational Communication, 1.2 Professional Collaboration, 1.3 Reflective Practice, 1.4 Digital Continuous Professional Development).

Area 2: Digital Resources (2.1 Selecting Digital Resources, 2.2 Creating and Modifying Digital Content, 2.3 Managing, Protecting, and Sharing Digital Resources).

Area 3: Teaching and Learning (3.1 Teaching, 3.2 Guidance, 3.3 Collaborative Learning, 3.4 Self-Regulated Learning).

Area 4: Assessment (4.1 Assessment Strategies, 4.2 Analyzing Evidence, 4.3 Feedback and Planning).

Area 5:Empowering Learners (5.1 Accessibility and Inclusion, 5.2 Differentiation and Personalization, 5.3 Actively Engaging Learners).

Area 6: Facilitating Learners’ Digital Competence (6.1 Information and Media Literacy, 6.2 Digital Communication and Collaboration, 6.3 Digital Content Creation, 6.4 Responsible Use, 6.5 Digital Problem Solving).

Models of Teacher Educators’ Digital Competences

Pupils and students study computer science and information technology at school and university, and many of them have good digital literacy. This necessitates the continuous improvement of teachers’ digital skills to meet new requirements for creating an effective learning environment. University teachers must meet the challenges of teaching in the information age (Esteve-Mon et al. 2020). The use of digital technologies in teacher education should be embedded in the curricula and programs of bachelor’s degrees to link school practice and university knowledge and ensure adequate digital skills in the context of increasingly digitalized learning environments (Krumsvik 2014).

To effectively use digital technologies in education, it is essential for future teachers to be both theoretically and practically familiar with educational approaches and methods; however, this knowledge cannot be replaced by digital skills alone (Mishra & Koehler 2006). For effective teaching, Mishra and Koehler (2006) propose a Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) model as a framework for conceptualizing the various knowledge requirements for digitally enabled teaching. This model builds on Shulman’s work (Shulman, 1986) and includes three intersecting domains: Content Knowledge (CK) – knowledge about the subject being taught, Pedagogical Knowledge (PK) – knowledge about teaching and learning processes, and Technological Knowledge (TK) – knowledge about technologies, including digital tools. The intersections between these areas represent specific domains, such as Technological Content Knowledge (TCK), Technological Pedagogical Knowledge (TPK), and Content Pedagogical Knowledge (CPK). The intersection of all three areas, Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK), is a form of expert knowledge that combines content, pedagogy, and technology, forming the foundation for effective teaching. This approach suggests that teaching any subject requires content knowledge, pedagogical skills, and technological support, including digital tools. This model further proposes that teachers should be systematically trained to use technology and continually improve their knowledge of both hardware and software to enhance teaching effectiveness (Mishra & Koehler 2006).

Collis (Collis et al. 2001; Collis & Moonen 2002) proposed one of the first models predicting the use of information technology in education. The model, which is based on practical experience, describes expectations about the influence of digital technologies on changing teaching and learning. Information and communication technologies facilitate flexible learning in terms of location, types of communication, interactivity, time, approaches, and resources used.

The proposed model, E-4 (Collis et al. 2001), outlines the factors that influence the likelihood of successfully integrating technology in an educational environment: the institutional environment, educational effectiveness, ease of use, and personal responsibility. Kirschner and Davis (2003) propose a model with two axes for using digital technologies in teacher training. The axes represent core and complementary technologies, as well as approaches for teaching how to use and learn through them. Research has explored the varying extents to which digital technology is used in teacher education. Benchmarks for teacher training have been identified, including personal digital competences, digital competences as cognitive tools, pedagogical digital competences, digital competences as instructional tools, competences for social communication in the learning process (e.g., information exchange and collaborative knowledge construction), and competences for evaluating student achievements.

A tool for assessing the digital competencies of university lecturers is the scale DSC-UT (Digital Competence Scale for University Teachers). By equipping teachers with essential digital competencies, the scale supports the long-term adaptability and effectiveness of higher education institutions in an increasingly digital environment. Working with this rating scale includes several stages: (a) creating an initial pool of items and a response scale, (b) assessing content and face validity, and (c) testing the factor structure and reliability of the new scale (Licen & Procen 2024). The psychometric properties of the scale were investigated by surveying 411 university lecturers from the University of Primorska (Licen & Procen 2024). The scale has four factors, between which a relationship is established: digital literacy, digital skills, digital interaction and technology integration. This study highlights the critical role of digital competencies in promoting sustainable education practises in university.

Researchers are developing reliable tools to assess the digital skills of university teachers (Tondeur et al. 2017). Tondeur and colleagues defined a two-factor structure for ICT competencies: first, competencies to support pupils in using ICT in the classroom, and second, and competencies to use ICT in instructional design.

In assessing digital readiness and competency among Sofia University professors, a version of the SELFIE tool adapted to the Bulgarian context was implemented. How can SELFIE be applied in higher education institutions? Although the main focus of the tool is on primary and secondary schools, the concept of self-assessment and digital self-improvement can be readily adapted to a university environment:

– Adapting to the digital needs of the academic context. All areas of the DigCompEdu framework (resource creation, assessment, development of students’ digital competencies, etc.) are equally applicable to teachers in higher education.

– Collective self-reflection and development. Group reflections by teaching teams, departments, or chairs can provide valuable insights for identifying common learning needs and developing joint strategies.

– Institutional policies and support. Anonymized and aggregated data can be used to plan training programs, institutional digitalization strategies, and the introduction of new technologies.

– Recognizing progress. Certificates and digital badges can be integrated into quality portfolios, professional development pathways, or even the design of teacher education programs.

Recognizing the success of SELFIE in the school sector, the EuropeanCommission initiated the development of DIGI-HE to address the specificneeds of higher education institutions. DIGI-HE builds on the existingtested SELFIE tool for schools and the DigCompOrg Framework, transferring the successful approach and lessons learned from the school sector tohigher education while adapting to the unique characteristics of universities (Ehlers & Bonaudo 2020).

The development of DIGI-HE filled a significant gap in the higher education sector, as no European self-evaluation tool equivalent to SELFIEexisted for universities. While some tools focused on digital learning and teaching or digital skills for individual university members, DIGI-HE represents the first comprehensive institutional assessment tool of its kind for higher education (Ehlers & Bonaudo 2020).

The Bulgarian adaptation of SELFIE used in this research was developed and tested as part of the SUMMIT project (contract no. BG-RRP-2.004-0008) to ensure its relevance to the Bulgarian educational environment. This adaptation was designed to meet specific educational needs and cultural nuances, enhancing the tool‘s effectiveness in assessing and improving digital readiness among teachers at all levels of the Bulgarian educational system (Peytcheva-Forsyth & Yovkova, 2024; Peytcheva-Forsyth & Racheva 2024).

The original evaluation scale, based on a progression model ranging from ‘A1 – I am aware...’ to ‘C2 – I contribute…,’ was preserved, with an additional ‘None of the above’ option, resulting in seven selectable responses for each statement. During the testing of the Bulgarian version, over 30 university instructors in ICT-based disciplines, involved in initial teacher training and ongoing qualification programs, provided valuable feedback on the wording of the items. The Bulgarian version retains the original questionnaire structure, with the same number of items per subscale (ranging from three to nine), totaling 32 items overall.

The main psychometric properties of the self-assessment questionnaire were preliminary verified using two independent convenience samples composed of university professors (n = 96) and secondary education teachers (n = 281) (Mizova & Peytcheva-Forsyth 2024). High Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were observed: 0.975 for university professors and 0.896 for teachers, confirming the instrument’s consistency and applicability as outlined in the project documentation (PeytchevaForsyth & Racheva 2024). To further explore the internal consistency of the instrument, a correlation analysis using Pearson’s r was conducted in both samples to examine the intercorrelations among the six subscales. The positive correlations between the subscales indicate that increases in one subscale are associated with increases in the others. For all subscale pairs, the correlation was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The measured effect sizes in both validation samples (university professors and teachers) were large to very large, with correlation values ranging from 0.70 to 0.80, indicating the cohesiveness and consistency of the measured construct (Mizova & Peytcheva-Forsyth 2024).

Research methods and tools

Our research follows an explanatory sequential model - a mixed method, consisting of two stages. The first one is a quantitative stage in which we apply quantitative methods and statistical hypothesis and the second one is a qualitative stage, which is based on analysis of the results of structured interviews.

The methodology of our research is presented schematically in Figure 1. We follow the mixed-methods sequential explanatory design outlined by Ivankova et al. (2006). In a sequential model, quantitative data analysis in the first phase can reveal extreme or outlier cases. Follow-up qualitative interviews with these outlier cases can then provide insight into why they diverged from the broader quantitative sample (Creswell 2015).

In the first stage, during the 2023-2024 academic year, the Bulgarian version of SELFIE was administered to a sample of 90 university professors from various faculties at Sofia University, excluding the Faculty of Physics (Sample 1). The sample from the Faculty of Physics alone consisted of six professors (Sample 2). In our research we primarily focus on the following research questions:

RQ#1: Are there statistically significant differences in responses between general university teacher training and physics-specific teacher training at Sofia University?

RQ#2: To what extent do qualitative interviews align with or diverge from survey responses regarding digital competencies in teacher training?

It is important to note that our samples are independent, suggesting that, for the quantitative phase, the Chi-square test is the most appropriate for comparing theoretical and empirical distributions. The theoretical distribution (expected values for Sample 2) is generated based on the empirical results of Sample 1. The empirical distribution of responses in Sample 2 is then compared to this theoretical distribution.

The qualitative phase follows the quantitative analysis and aims to explore the reasons behind the statistical differences if there are any through interviews with the six professors from the Faculty of Physics.

Figure 1. Research Process Flowchart

The chosen methodology is based on a multifaceted approach to studying the level of digitalization, as developed by a scientific team from Sofia University (Mizova et al. 2025). Their research describes the full toolkit, which is grounded in qualitative methods. We apply some of these methods to our study, specifically to assess the digital competence of lecturers from the Faculty of Physics at Sofia University.

Results and Analysis

The Chi-square procedure was used to compare two distributions for Sample 2 (n=6): one theoretical distribution, based on the expected frequency of each response option for each question, and one empirical distribution, based on the actual responses of Sample 2. Expected values were calculated by applying the percentage response distribution from Sample 1 to Sample 2, by multiplying each percentage by six (the sample size of Sample 2). The null hypothesis is rejected for the upper-tail, one-sided Chi-square test (α = 0.05) in three areas (Table 1). Critical values of the Chi-square distribution are taken from the official website of National Institute of Standards and Technology (2025).

Table 1. Chi-square values across Areas 1 to 6 and corresponding hypothesis results (H0 indicates no significant difference between theoretical and empirical distributions; H1 indicates a significant difference between theoretical and empirical distributions)

Area ofcompetenceNumber ofquestions(eachquestionhas 7options)Totalnumberofoptions(x7)Chi-squareDegreesoffreedom(df)Criticalvalue for theupper-tailone-sidedtestHypothesisacceptedArea 1.ProfessionalEngagement96395.275775.62H1Area 2. DigitalResources53537.033249.19H0Area3. Teachingand Learning53582.373448.60H1Area 4.Assessment32125.292031.41H0Area 5.EmpoweringLearners42822.902841.34H0Area 6.FacilitatingLearner’s DigitalCompetence64270.984156.94H1

Significant statistical differences were found between Sample 1 and Sample 2 in Areas 1, 3, and 6, supporting hypothesis H1, which indicates differences between the distributions. The largest effect sizes contributing to these differences were observed for Question 1.8 (Option 7) in Area 1, Question 3.4 (Option 7) in Area 4, Question 6.4 (Options 1 and 2) in Area 6 (Table 2). These differences will be further explored in the qualitative stage of the research, considering the context of other response options for Question 1.8, as well as Questions 3.4 and 6.4. For ease of qualitative analysis, these options are presented in Table 3 (Appendix).

Table 2. Options from the questionnaire with the greatest effect size contributing to the significant differences between the theoretical and empirical distributions in Area 1, 3 and 6

Area of competenceQuestion NoOption NoEffect sizeArea 1. ProfessionalEngagementQ1.8. Engagement in ProfessionalTraining for the Development ofTeachers‘Digital Competence.761.70Area 3.Teaching andLearningQ3.4. Use of DigitalTechnologiesto Promote and Enhance Learners‘Collaboration for Individual andCollective Learning.756.13Area 6. FacilitatingLearner’s DigitalCompetenceQ6.4. Empowering Learners to UseDigital TechnologiesSafelyWhileMitigating Risks to Ensure Physical,Psychological, and SocialWell-being.Q6.2. Enhancing the digitalcompetence of learners –communication and collaboration.Implementation of educational activitiesthat require learners to communicateand collaborate using digitaltechnologies.1223.4320.72

Empirical distributions of responses from Sample 1 and Sample 2 for Questions 1.8, 3.4, and 6.4 are presented in Figure 2.

In the second stage of our research, which was qualitative, we conducted structured interviews to confirm and explain the results of the first stage. These interviews were carried out with university professors from Sample 2, after they completed the survey. Quirkos software was used for the qualitative analysis of the interview data. The interviews lasted between 45 and 60 minutes and followed a set of pre-defined questions covering several topics:

1. General digital competencies as a necessity for modern teaching and learning.

2. Development of pedagogical digital competencies.

3. Approaches for using digital technologies in teaching.

4. Application of pedagogical digital competencies in education.

These topics address a range of issues relevant to the study.

Question 1.8 includes seven options. The data in Figure 2 show that lecturers chose Options 3,2, and 1 most often from the Faculty of Physics. The results for options 1, 3, and 5 are comparable across both samples. These options relate to participation in digital competence development activities and the use of digital resources in teaching. In contrast, the participants from the Faculty of Physics did not select options 2, 4, and 6. These options pertain to choosing and participating in professional training programs on resource utilization, as well as developing such programs. This suggests that lecturers from the Faculty of Physics rely more on self-study and peer collaboration for digital skill development.

Figure 2. Empirical distributions of responses from Sample 1 and Sample 2 for Questions 1.8, 3.4, and 6.4

Half of the participants in Sample 2 selected option 7 (“None of the above”). This may indicate that more professional training opportunities exist for using digital resources than were reflected in the survey. Notably, participants who chose option 7 did not explicitly mention participation in professional training. However, they did receive training on using the MOODLE platform during the Covid-19 pandemic. Additionally, the use of other platforms requiring training suggests that faculty members largely depend on self-learning and peer support to develop their digital skills.

To further support the survey data, we analyze interview responses related to options 1, 3, and 5 for Question 1.8. The lecturers from the Faculty of Physics are numbered from 1 to 6 (corresponding to the number of study participants).

Option 1 is confirmed by Lecturer №1, who stated: “Maintaining professional development is extremely important, as individual software products are constantly being updated and improved.”

Options 3 and 5 are supported by responses from:

Lecturer №6, who noted: “We are trying to develop competence, learning from students and continuing to improve our skills in the future...”

Lecturer №4, who emphasized: “Professional development is extremely important, so we refine and perfect our use of software products.”

The interview data for Question 1.8, specifically for options 1, 3, and 5, align with the interview responses.

Similarly, Question 3.4 includes seven options, just like Question 1.8. According to the data (Figure 2), differences can be observed in options 1, 2, 5, 6, and 7. Options 1, 5, and 6 were not selected, while option 7 (“None of the above”) was chosen by two participants from the Faculty of Physics. This suggests that one-third of the surveyed professors from Sample 2 may not use digital technologies for selfregulated and collective learning. However, three professors indicated in the survey that they actively try to use digital technologies to support students in planning and regulating their own learning (Options 2 and 3).

A complete correlation between both samples is found in option 4, which refers to selecting and using technologies to enhance students’ self-regulated learning skills. This includes encouraging students to take initiative and engage in reflective learning processes. Option 4 also expands on options 2 and 3, both of which were selected by other participants.

To validate the survey data for options 2, 3, and 4 in Question 3.4 (Sample 2), we analyzed interview responses:

For option 3, participants 1 and 3 provided supporting statements:

“I use digital tools to manage the learning process, such as electronic assessment platforms, course management, and communication between teachers and students.”

“…Such resources are also used in assessment, offering students self-assessment sheets. They can use digital resources to encourage reflection and self-assessment, which is part of formative assessment.”

The interview responses confirm and align with the survey data.

Regarding option 4, three professors (Participants 3, 5, and 6) responded positively in the interviews, although only one of them selected this option in the survey. Their responses are as follows:

“During the exam, we create a folder with students’ digital coursework, which they exchange. I encourage them to edit each other’s work and express their opinions on its content.”

“Exercises are provided where students generate content using artificial intelligence, such as ChatGPT or other generative AI tools. Based on their physics knowledge, they verify the accuracy of the generated content. Since AI models use large language datasets, their calculations are often incorrect. Therefore, students must carefully check all calculations—the logic may be correct, but numerical results often have a high probability of error.”

“In astronomy, we use many databases. The resources I share typically have simplified graphical interfaces to ensure accessibility. I deliberately select tools that facilitate information sharing without creating unnecessary barriers for students.” Option 2, which relates to using digital technologies to encourage and support students’ independent learning, was selected by two teachers in the survey but was not directly confirmed in the interviews.

Overall, the teachers’ responses indicate a consistent and systematic approach to integrating digital technologies in education, rather than isolated efforts. This is further supported by their answers regarding options 3 and 4, which were also selected by two teachers in the survey.

The differences in survey responses for Q6.4 are primarily seen in Option 1, which indicates that participants are aware of learning activities related to the safe use of digital technologies, data privacy protection, participation in social networks, and related topics. This option was selected by two-thirds of the lecturers from the Faculty of Physics, suggesting that their knowledge of these issues is more passive—meaning they are aware of the concepts but do not actively conduct activities with students on safe digital practices.

Option 1 was also the most frequently chosen response among other lecturers, highlighting a general tendency to neglect this aspect of digital technology training, despite its importance. Additionally, there is a correlation between option 7 (“None of the above”) and option 3. Only one of the six lecturers reported conducting activities with students on the responsible use and creation of digital resources, such as privacy protection, creating strong passwords, safeguarding personal data, and blocking suspicious individuals.

The interview data provide weak support for the survey results from Q6.4. Only one teacher explicitly mentioned this topic, stating:

“One such issue is misinformation. The best way to combat this problem, in my opinion, is to instill in students a discipline regarding resources and sources.”

A possible explanation for this weak alignment is that the interview questions may not have emphasized this topic, leading to an omission in the responses.

Discussion

The statistical analysis of survey data from both samples reveals correlations in responses across the six thematic areas. Statistically significant differences were found in three areas, while the remaining three showed no significant variation.

There were no statistical differences in Areas 2, 4, and 5. We provide the following interpretation.

For Area 2 – Digital Resources (2.1 Selecting Digital Resources, 2.2 Creating and Modifying Digital Content, 2.3 Managing, Protecting, and Sharing Digital Resources):

Lecturers from the Faculty of Physics provided comparable responses regarding the selection, creation, management, and sharing of digital resources. This suggests that their efforts are focused on developing these essential digital competencies.

For Area 4 – Assessment (4.1 Assessment Strategies, 4.2 Analyzing Evidence, 4.3 Feedback and Planning):

The use of digital technologies for assessment is consistent across both samples, with similar practices such as computer-based tests and feedback assignments.

For Area 5 – Empowering Learners (5.1 Accessibility and Inclusion, 5.2 Differentiation and Personalization, 5.3 Actively Engaging Learners):

The provision of access to digital resources for university students is uniform, as evidenced by access to various electronic platforms and databases.

These findings are further supported by the interview data, where these areas were most frequently discussed.

The differences observed in survey responses primarily concern Areas 1.8, 3.4, and 6.4, though they represent only a small portion of the questions in these areas.

Area 6 (Students’ Digital Competencies in Problem-Solving, Ethical and Responsible Use of Digital Resources, Creation of Digital Content for SelfExpression, and Collaborative Use of Resources) contains five questions, with no significant differences between the two samples.

Area 3 (Use of Emerging Technologies, Collaborative Learning, Digital Feedback, and Digital Learning Environments) includes four questions, also without differences.

Area 1 (Computational Thinking, Independent Digital Learning, Safe and Responsible Digital Practices, Reflection, University-Level Digital Infrastructure, Collaboration with Colleagues, Online Learning Management, and Digital Communication) consists of eight questions, with no statistical differences between responses.

Overall, the findings indicate that the use of digital technologies and the development of digital competencies are comparable between both samples. However, it is important to acknowledge that the small sample size of lecturers from the Faculty of Physics may not fully represent the broader faculty population.

Conclusion

This study examined the digital competencies of university lecturers at Sofia University, with a particular focus on differences between general faculty and those from the Faculty of Physics.

Regarding RQ#1 (Are there statistically significant differences in responses between general university teacher training and physics-specific teacher training at Sofia University?), the quantitative analysis confirmed statistically significant differences in three key areas: professional development in digital competencies (Area 1), self-regulated and collaborative learning using digital technologies (Area 3), and ethical and responsible use of digital resources (Area 6). These results suggest that physics lecturers tend to rely more on self-directed learning and peer collaboration rather than structured professional training. However, no significant differences were found in areas related to digital resource management, assessment practices, and student empowerment, indicating a shared foundation in integrating digital tools into teaching.

For RQ#2 (To what extent do qualitative interviews align with or diverge from survey responses regarding digital competencies in teacher training?), the qualitative phase provided partial confirmation of the survey results. While interviews supported the findings that physics lecturers actively use digital tools for teaching and assessment, they also revealed a gap in formal training opportunities and structured engagement with ethical and security aspects of digital technology. Notably, awareness of digital ethics was high, but few structured activities were conducted with students in this area. In some cases, interview responses highlighted additional digital practices not explicitly captured in the survey, particularly regarding the use of AI and astronomy databases.

These findings indicate that while digital technology is systematically integrated into university teaching, its development remains largely informal for physics lecturers. Addressing this gap through structured institutional training programs, targeted professional development, and a stronger emphasis on digital ethics could enhance digital competence and ensure a more comprehensive approach to digital learning in higher education.

Appendix 1

Options of Q1.8, Q3.4, and Q6.4

Q1.8. Option 1I am aware that my participation in training on the use of digitaltechnologies can develop my digital competences (e.g.webinars orworkshops on the use of digital technologies in teaching and learning).Q1.8. Option 2I have attended professional training activities on the use of digitaltechnologies to develop my digital competencies (e.g., micro-training,seminars on the use of digital technologies in teaching and learning).Q1.8. Option 3I participate invarious formal and informal professional training activitieson the use of digital technologies to develop my digital competencies(e.g., hands-on training on the pedagogical use of digital technologies,online learning approaches, digital assessment).Q1.8. Option 4Ianalyzeandselectprofessionaltrainingontheuseofdigitaltechnologies based on my needs (e.g., using a self-reflection tool formy digital competence, setting learning goals, designing my training,reflecting on my learning).Q1.8. Option 5I provide learning activities on the use of digital technologies andsupportcolleaguesindevelopingtheirdigitalcompetence(e.g.,seminars, informal sessionswith colleagues, micro-training on the useof digital technologies).Q1.8. Option 6I contribute to the design of professional training programs aimed atdeveloping teachers‘digital competence (e.g., project-based trainingusing digital technologies, sharing best practices).
Q1.8. Option 7None of the above.Q3.4. Option 1I am aware that digital technologies can be used to promote active andautonomous learning (e.g., planning, goal setting, tracking progress).Q3.4. Option 2I have tried using digital technologies to support students in planningtheir own learning (e.g., planningwith digital calendars, setting goalswith digital journals, tracking progress).Q3.4. Option 3Iusevariousdigitaltechnologiestosupportstudentsinplanningand regulating their own learning (e.g., online learning environments,online resource repositories, collaboration tools and spaces, learningjournals, e-portfolios).Q3.4. Option 4I choose digital technologies that facilitate the presentation and analysisof learning data to support my observations of my teaching practiceandofmystudents‘learning(e.g.recordingandvisualizingdata,automatically generated graphs, mind mapping tools, digital boards).Q4.2. Option 5I select and use digital technologies in my teaching projects based ontheir characteristics to facilitate my students‘self-regulated learningskills and autonomy (e.g., taking initiative in their own learning, beingcreative and responsive to new learning situations, engaging in self-reflection to plan and guide their progress).Q3.4. Option 6Togetherwithmystudents,Ireflectandsupportthemin(re)designing their learning through and on the use of digital technologies,encouragingtheirself-regulationoflearningandlearnerautonomy(e.g., identifying their needs, setting learning goals, describing theirstrategy for achieving those goals, completing learning tasks, gatheringevidence of their learning, reflecting on it, and sharing their learningoutcomes).Q3.4. Option 7None of the above.Q6.4. Option 1I am aware of learning activities that encourage students to use digitaltechnologies safely (e.g., how to protect data privacy, read terms ofuse, avoid social exclusion, preventviolence in digital environments).Q6.4. Option 2I have tried learning activities that allow students to reflect on thesafety andwell-being consequences of using digital technologies (e.g.,identifying inappropriate behavior, discussing issues of excessive use/addiction).Q6.4. Option 3I carry outvarious learning activities to encourage students to actinresponsibleandethicalwayswhencreatingandusingdigitalinformation(e.g.,adjustingtheirsocialmediasettings,protectingpersonal data and privacy, setting strong passwords, blocking andreporting individualswho make them feel uncomfortable).
Q6.4. Option 4I design training to help students develop strategies for the responsibleand ethical use of technology to protect their reputation and promotesocialwell-being(e.g.,balancingonlineandofflineactivities,recognizingandaddressingcyberbullying/sexting/racism,etc.indigital environments).Q6.4. Option 5I reflect on and (re)design learning activities based on the continuousevolution of online risks and threats, so that I enable students to followandadoptpositivepracticesfortheirphysical,psychological,andsocialwell-being, aswell as that of their peers (e.g., how companiescollect and use data on individuals, how social media affects emotionaland social relationships).Q6.4. Option 6My students and I contribute to creating a culture in our university andits broader communitywhere the negative and positive uses of digitaltechnologies are openly discussed, alongwithways to avoid risks andthreats (e.g., practicalworkshops on online safety, coaching on digitalwell-being for peers, teachers, and parents).Q6.4. Option 7None of the above.

NOTES

1. https://iste.org/standards

2. https://teachertaskforce.org/sites/default/files/2020-07/ict_framework.pdf

3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2025. EHandbook of Statistical Methods. Available at: http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/ handbook / (last accessed 23 June 2025).

Acknowledgement and Funding

This study is supported by the European Union-NextGenerationEU, through the National Recovery and Resilience Plan of the Republic of Bulgaria, project No BG-RRP-2.004-0008.

REFERENCES

COLLIS, B.; PETERS, O. & PALS, N., 2001. A model for predicting the educational use of information and communication technologies, Instructional Science, no. 29, pp. 95 – 125. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003937401428.

COLLIS, B. & MOONEN, J., 2002. Flexible learning in a digital world, Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and eLearning, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 217 – 230. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1080/0268051022000048228.

CLARO, M.; SALINAS, Á.; CABELLO-HUTT, T.; SAN MARTÍN, E.; PREISS, D. D.; VALENZUELA, S. & JARA, I., 2018. Teaching in a Digital Environment (TIDE): Defining and measuring teachers‘ capacity to develop students‘ digital information and communication skills, Computers & Education, no. 121, pp. 162 – 174. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.001.

CRESWELL, J. W., 2015. Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.

EHLERS, U. D. & BONAUDO, P., 2020.DIGI-HE–AStrategic Reflection Tool on Digitalisation at European Higher Education Institutions. EDEN Conference Proceedings, no. 1, pp. 289 – 298. Available from: https://doi.org/10.38069/edenconf-2020-ac0027.

ESTEVE-MON, F. M.; LLOPIS-NEBOT, M. Á. &ADELL-SEGURA, J., 2020. Digital teaching competence of university teachers: A systematic review of the literature, IEEE revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologías del aprendizaje, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 399 – 406.

FERRARI, A., 2012. Digital competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks, vol. 10, p. 82116, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

LIČEN, S. & PROSEN, M., 2024. Strengthening sustainable higher education with digital technologies: development and validation of a digital competence scale for university teachers (DCS-UT), Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 22, p. 9937. Available from: https://doi. org/10.3390/su16229937.

HUGHES, J. & THOMPSON, S., 2022. Assessment in the makerspace. Making, Makers, Makerspaces: The Shift to Making in 20 Schools. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

IVANKOVA, N. V.; CRESWELL, J. W. & STICK, S. L., 2006. Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field methods, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 3 – 20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260.

KIRSCHNER, P. &DAVIS, N., 2003. Pedagogic benchmarks for information and communications technology in teacher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, vol.12, no. 1, pp. 125 – 147. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390300200149.

KRUMSVIK, R. J., 2014. Teacher educators‘ digital competence. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 269 – 280. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313 831.2012.726273.

MISHRA, P. & KOEHLER, M. J., 2006. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 1017 – 1054. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.

MILIOU, O.; ADAMOU, M.; MAVRI, A. & IOANNOU, A., 2024. An exploratory case study of the use of a digital self-assessment tool of 21st-century skills in makerspace contexts. Educational technology research and development, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 239 – 260. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10314-0.

MIZOVA, B. & PEYTCHEVA-FORSYTH, R., 2024. Digital Pedagogical Competences of Bulgarian Secondary Teachers – Preliminary Data. EDULEARN24 Proceedings, IATED, pp. 2623 – 2632. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2024.0717.

MIZOVA, B.; PEYTCHEVA-FORSYTH, R. & MELLAR, H., 2025. A multi-faceted approach to researching the level of digitalization in initial teacher preparation, Strategies for Policy in Science and Education, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 28 – 520.

PEYTCHEVA-FORSYTH, R. & YOVKOVA, B., 2024. Development of Digital Pedagogical Competences in the University Initial Teacher Training Programmes – the Perspective of University Professors and Future Teachers (Sofia University Case). EDULEARN24 Proceedings, IATED, pp. 9603 – 9613. Available from: https://doi. org/10.21125/edulearn.2024.2321.

PEYTCHEVA-FORSYTH, R. & RACHEVA, V., 2024. Bridging Digital Competences: A Comparative Analysis Between University Teacher Trainers and Secondary School Teachers in Bulgaria. EDULEARN24 Proceedings, IATED, pp. 4518 – 4527. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2024.1125.

PUNIE, Y. & REDECKER, C., 2017. European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

SHULMAN, L. S., 1986. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 4 – 14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004.

THOMS, L. J.; KREMSER, E.; VON KOTZEBUE, L.; BECKER, S.; THYSSEN, C.; HUWER, J.; ... & MEIER, M., 2022. A framework for the digital competencies for teaching in science education– DiKoLAN. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 2297, no. 1, p. 012002. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1088/17426596/2297/1/012002.

TONDEUR, J.; AESAERT, K.; PYNOO, B.; VAN BRAAK, J.; FRAEYMAN, N. & ERSTAD, O., 2017. Developing a validated instrument to measure preservice teachers’ ICT competencies: Meeting the demands of the 21st century. British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 462 – 472. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12380.

2025 година
Книжка 9s
Книжка 9
DEVELOPMENT OF DEMOCRATIC CULTURE THROUGH CONTENTS ABOUT THE ROMA IN CLASSROOM TEACHING – STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION

Aleksandra Trbojević, Biljana Jeremić, Hadži Živorad Milenović, Bojan Lazić

Книжка 8
КАТЕГОРИАЛНИ ИЗМЕРЕНИЯ НА ИНФОРМАЦИОННО-КОМУНИКАЦИОННИТЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ СЪС СОП

д.п.н Мира Цветкова-Арсова, Данка Щерева, Славина Лозанова, Маргарита Томова

Книжка 7
ВРЪЗКА НА СОЦИАЛНО-ЕМОЦИОНАЛНОТО С КОГНИТИВНОТО РАЗВИТИЕ В ПРИОБЩАВАЩА СРЕДА

Милен Замфиров, Маргарита Бакрачева, Емилия Евгениева

Книжка 6
КОГНИТИВНО РАЗВИТИЕ НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ, ОБХВАНАТИ В ПРИОБЩАВАЩОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Милен Замфиров, Емилия Евгениева, Маргарита Бакрачева

Книжка 5
COMPETENCE FOR SOCIAL PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICE: WHAT DO STUDENTS TELL US?

Maya Tcholakova, Marina Pironkova, Aleksandar Ranev, Yana Staneva

MULTIMODAL COMMUNICATION IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION CLASSES

Cristiana Lucretia Pop, Cristina Filip

Книжка 4s
GAMES IN FUNCTION OF DEVELOPMENT OF MULTIPLICATION SKILLS

Dasare Sylejmani, Vesna Makashevska, Jasmina Jovanovska

Книжка 4
ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА СИСТЕМИТЕ ЗА УПРАВЛЕНИЕ НА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО В КОНТЕКСТА НА ИНТЕРАКТИВНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Силвия Парушева, Борис Банков, Гергана Касабова, Петя Страшимирова

MILITARY AND SOCIAL THREATS AS DETERMINANTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONTEMPORARY UKRAINIAN HIGHER EDUCATION

Mykola Pantiuk, Tetiana Pantiuk, Nataliia Bakhmat, Olena Nevmerzhytska, Svitlana Ivakh

STEM ОБУЧЕНИЕ НА СТУДЕНТИ ПЕДАГОЗИ В ТРАНСДИСЦИПЛИНАРНА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА СРЕДА

Любен Витанов, Николай Цанев, Людмила Зафирова, Гергана Христова, Катерина Динкова, Калина Георгиева, Жорж Кюшев, Здравка Савчева

ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ И АНАЛИЗ НА НАГЛАСИТЕ НА СТУДЕНТИТЕ ПРИ ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА ГЕНЕРАТИВЕН ИНСТРУМЕНТ НА ИЗКУСТВЕН ИНТЕЛЕКТ

Николай Янев, Иглика Гетова, Теодора Христова, Ива Костадинова, Георги Димитров

Книжка 3
ДРУГИЯТ КАТО ЦЕННОСТ В УЧИЛИЩЕ

Александър Кръстев

Книжка 2
ASSESSMENTS OF TEACHERS AND PARENTS OF CHILDREN WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ON INCLUSION IN PRE-SCHOOL INSTITUTIONS

Zagorka Markov, Hadzi Zivorad Milenovic, Biljana Jeremic, Radmila Zecevic, Milica Pavlovic

Книжка 1s
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА СРЕДСТВАТА ЗА ДОПЪЛВАЩА И АЛТЕРНАТИВНА КОМУНИКАЦИЯ В ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИТЕ ИНСТИТУЦИИ В БЪЛГАРИЯ

. Неда Балканска, . Анна Трошева-Асенова, . Пенка Шапкова, Снежина Михайлова

USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING

Ekaterina Sofronieva, Christina Beleva, Galina Georgieva

Книжка 1
Скъпи читатели, автори, приятели на списание „Педагогика“,

В началото на 2025 година в първия брой на нашето списание „Педагогика“ бих искала от името на редакционната колегия и от мое име да Ви пожелая здраве, творческо вдъхновение и професионално удовлетворение от прино- са Ви към педагогическата наука и практика! Вярвам и се надявам, че списание „Педагоги- ка“ ще продължи да осигурява платформа за научен, обективен и откровен диалог, базиран на резултати от научни изследвания, за насто- ящето и бъдещето на обучението и образова- н

2024 година
Книжка 9s
Книжка 9
ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT OF VIDEO LEARNING RESOURCES IN SMALL-SCALE LEARNING SCENARIOS

César Córcoles, Laia Blasco-Soplon, Germán Cobo Rodríguez, Ana-Elena Guerrero-Roldán

Книжка 8
АНГАЖИРАНОСТ КЪМ УЧЕНЕ ЧРЕЗ ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА СМАРТ ТЕХНОЛОГИИТЕ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Кирилка Тагарева, Дора Левтерова-Гаджалова, Ваня Сивакова

Книжка 7
Книжка 6
Книжка 5s
ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВАТА НА СТАЖАНТСКАТА ПРАКТИКА ПРЕД СТУДЕНТИ – БЪДЕЩИ УЧИТЕЛИ

Илиана Петкова, Марияна Илиева, Владислава Станоева, Георги Чавдаров

Книжка 5
FEATURES OF SPEECH COMPREHENSION TRAINING OF CHILDREN WITH AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS

Maryna Branytska, Svitlana Myronova, Svitlana Mykhalska

OVERVIEW OF THE STEM EDUCATION IN ISRAEL

Aharon Goldreich, Elena Karashtranova

Книжка 4
НАГЛАСИ НА СТУДЕНТИТЕ КЪМ СМАРТ ТЕХНОЛОГИИТЕ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Дора Левтерова-Гаджалова, Кирилка Тагарева, Ваня Сивакова

PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT FOR YOUNG RESEARCHERS

Emina Vukašinović, Marija Veselinović, Milan Milikić

РОБОТИТЕ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО – ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА STEAM ИГРА

Мария Желязкова, Михаил Кожухаров, Даниела Кожухарова

Книжка 3s
Книжка 3
ATTITUDES AND EXPERIENCES OF THE PRESCHOOL TEACHERS IN THE APPLICATION OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION

Nataša Branković, Gordana Kozoderović, Biljana Jeremić, Danijela Petrović, Bojan Lazić, Slavica Karanović

ДИГИТАЛНИ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ПОДКРЕПА НА УЧЕНЕТО

Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова, Лъчезар Лазаров

PREPARATION OF FUTURE TEACHERS FOR ORGANISING A HEALTH-PRESERVING INCLUSIVE SPACE IN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

Nadiya Skotna, Tetiana Nadimyanova, Anna Fedorovych, Myroslava Sosiak, Oksana Yatsiv

Книжка 2s
Книжка 2
ОТ РИСУНКА – КЪМ СНИМКА

Камен Теофилов

Книжка 1s
Книжка 1
„ВТОРОТО“ БЪЛГАРСКО УЧИЛИЩЕ. ГЕНЕЗИСЪТ

Пенка Цонева, Бистра Мизова

2023 година
Книжка 9
EXPLORING THE NARRATIVE IDENTITY OF HUNGARIAN TEACHERS IN SLOVAKIA

Patrik Baka, Terézia Stredl, Kinga Horváth, Zsuzsanna Huszár, Melinda Nagy, Péter Tóth, András Németh

Книжка 8
A QUALITY “ONLINE” TEACHER – WHAT DO STUDENTS APPRECIATE AND VALUE IN TEACHERS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING?

Irena Golubović-Ilić, Ivana Ćirković-Miladinović, Nataša Vukićević

SUPPORT FOR THE INCLUSION OF ROMA CHILDREN THROUGH THE PROJECT TEACHING MODEL

Biljana Jeremić, Aleksandra Trbojević, Bojan Lazić, Gordana Kozoderović

TREND ANALYSIS OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCES OF SPORTS TEACHERS AND COACHES

Sergejs Capulis, Valerijs Dombrovskis, Svetlana Guseva, Alona Korniseva

Книжка 7
ЦЕННОСТЕН ПРОФИЛ НА УЧИТЕЛИТЕ В НАЦИОНАЛЕН КОНТЕКСТ

Цветан Давидков, Силвия Цветанска

Книжка 6s
MODELLING OF MARITIME CYBER SECURITY EDUCATION AND TRAINING

Gizem Kayisoglu, Pelin Bolat, Emre Duzenli

INTRODUCING THE USE OF CASE STUDIES METHODOLOGY IN TRAINING FOR SOFT SKILLS IN MARITIME UNIVERSITIES. THE ISOL-MET PROGRAM

Maria Lekakou, Helen Iakovaki, Dimitris Vintzilaios, Markella Gota, Giorgos Georgoulis, Thalia Vintzilaiou

THE ROLE OF MARITIME EDUCATION IN DIGITALIZATION

Kamelia Narleva, Yana Gancheva

Книжка 6
С МИСИЯ ЗА НАЦИОНАЛНА И КУЛТУРНА ИНДИВИДУАЛНОСТ

Надежда Кръстева, Йордан Колев

Книжка 5s
PREFACE

Nikola Vaptsarov Naval Academy is the oldest technical educational institution in Bulgaria. The Naval Academy is one of the symbols of Varna and Bulgaria in the world maritime community. Its history and achievements establish it as the most prestigious center for training of maritime specialists. At present, the Naval Academy trains specialists for the Navy and for the merchant marine in all areas of maritime life. Research and development conducted at the Naval Academy in Varna

A FAIR CONCERN ABOUT ECDIS

Nikolay Sozonov, Dilyan Dimitranov

DATA-DRIVEN LEARNING APPROACH TO MARITIME ENGLISH

Jana Kegalj, Mirjana Borucinsky, Sandra Tominac Coslovich

DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS THROUGH THE “CASE STUDY” TEACHING METHOD IN MARITIME ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING (MELT)

Tamila Mikeladze, Svetlana Rodinadze, Zurab Bezhanovi, Kristine Zarbazoia, Medea Abashidze, Kristine Iakobadze

MAXIMIZING STUDENTS’ LEARNING IN MARITIME ENGLISH ONLINE COURSE

Valentyna Kudryavtseva, Svitlana Barsuk, Olena Frolova

Книжка 5
Книжка 4s
Книжка 4
Книжка 3s
СПИРАЛАТА ОБЩЕСТВО – ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Иванка Шивачева-Пинеда

Книжка 3
ПРОЕКТНО БАЗИРАНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ ЗА СОЦИАЛНО-ЕМОЦИОНАЛНИ И ТЕХНОЛОГИЧНИ УМЕНИЯ ЧРЕЗ ПРОГРАМАТА „УМЕНИЯ ЗА ИНОВАЦИИ“

Галин Цоков, Александър Ангелов, Йоанна Минчева, Рени Димова, Мария Цакова

МЕДИЙНАТА ГРАМОТНОСТ И УЧИТЕЛИТЕ

Светла Цанкова, Стела Ангова, Мария Николова, Иван Вълчанов, Илия Вълков, Георги Минев

Книжка 2
INTONATION AND CHILDREN WITH EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL PROBLEMS

Katerina Zlatkova-Doncheva, Vladislav Marinov

Книжка 1
2022 година
Книжка 9
ТРАНСГРЕСИВНО-СИНЕРГИЧНО КАРИЕРНО РАЗВИТИЕ В „НЕФОРМАЛНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ“ В УНИВЕРСИТЕТА

д.п.н Яна Рашева-Мерджанова, Моника Богданова, Илиана Петкова

Книжка 8
INTEGRATING INTERCULTURAL EDUCATION IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOL CURRICULUM

Bujar Adili, Sonja Petrovska, Gzim Xhambazi

НАГЛАСИ НА БЪДЕЩИТЕ ДЕТСКИ УЧИТЕЛИ КЪМ STEM ПОДХОДА

Наталия Павлова, Михаела Тончева

Книжка 7
НАЦИОНАЛНАТА ИДЕЯ НА ПАИСИЙ ХИЛЕНДАРСКИ

Йордан Колев, Надежда Кръстева

Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ИВАН Д. ШИШМАНОВ – ЕВРОПЕИЗИРАНИЯТ БЪЛГАРИН

Надежда Кръстева, Йордан Колев

THE TECHNOLOGY OF DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNICATIVE CULTURE OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS

Mariia Oliiar, Nataliia Blahun, Halyna Bilavych, Nataliia Bakhmat, Tetyana Pantyuk

Книжка 4
TEACHERS’ATTITUDES BOUT TEACHING AND LEARNING MATHEMATICS

Aleksandra Mihajlović, Emina Kopas-Vukašinović, Vladimir Stanojević

EDUCATION 4.0 – THE CHANGE OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE LABOUR MARKET

Gergana Dimitrova, Blaga Madzhurova, Stefan Raychev, Dobrinka Stoyanova

Книжка 3s
DISTANCE LEARNING IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMICS

Baktybek Keldibekov, Shailoobek Karagulov

DIGITAL UNIVERSITIES: FEATURES AND KEY CHARACTERISTICS

Marina Skiba, Maktagali Bektemessov, Alma Turganbayeva

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
TWO-TIER MODEL OF TRAINING FUTURE TEACHERS FOR COACHING AT OUT-OF-SCHOOL INSTITUTIONS

Borys Savchuk, Tetyana Pantyuk, Natalia Sultanova, Halyna Bilavych, Mykola Pantyuk

Книжка 1
2021 година
Книжка 9
ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЕТО МЕЖДУ ФОРМАЛНОТО И НЕФОРМАЛНОТО ЗДРАВНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Доц. д-р Вержиния Боянова Гл. ас. д-р Константин Теодосиев Гл. ас. д-р Берджухи Йорданова

FORMATION OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE OF ASSISTANT TEACHER OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN SECONDARY EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

Prof. Dr. Vladyslava Liubarets, Prof. Dr. Nataliia Bakhmat, Prof. Dr. Olena Matviienko, Oksana Tsykhmeistruk, Inna Feltsan

Книжка 8
ОТНОСНО ЗАДЪЛЖИТЕЛНОСТТА НА ПРЕДУЧИЛИЩНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ – РЕЗУЛТАТИ ОТ ЕДНО ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ

Проф. д-р Маргарита Колева, доц. д-р Блага Джорова, д-р Ева Жечева

INFLUENCE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PEDAGOGICAL FEATURES OF STUDENTS ON THEIR ACTIVITY IN SELF-EDUCATION

Dr. Iryna Sereda, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Svitlana Karskanova, Assoc. Prof.

CENTRALISATION AND DECENTRALISATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HUNGARY AND GERMANY

Carla Liege Rodrigues Pimenta, Prof. Dr. Zolt†n R–nay, Prof. Dr. Andr†s Nmet

ЗА ПРИОБЩАВАНЕТО, ОБУЧЕНИЕТО И РАЗВИТИЕТО НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ С ИНТЕЛЕКТУАЛНИ ЗАТРУДНЕНИЯ

Златкова-Дончева, К. (2021). Приобщаване, обучение и развитие на деца и ученици с интелектуални затруднения. Бургас: Либра СКОРП, ISBN 978-954-471-705-6

Книжка 7s
CONCEPT OF PRESENT PRACTICE IN CHOOSING OF OPTIMAL NUMBER OF TUGS

Rino Bošnjak, Zvonimir Lušić , Filip Bojić, Dario Medić

S-101 CHARTS, DATABASE TABLES FOR S-101 CHARTS, AUTONOMOUS VESSEL

Vladimir Brozović, Danko Kezić, Rino Bošnjak, Filip Bojić

INFLUENCE OF HYDRO-METEOROLOGICAL ELEMENTS ON THE SHIP MANOEUVRING IN THE CITY PORT OF SPLIT

Zvonimir Lušić , Nenad Leder, Danijel Pušić, Rino Bošnjak

MEETING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS – EXPERIENCE FROM THE LARGEST SHIPPING COMPANIES

Katarina Balić , Helena Ukić Boljat, Gorana Jelić Mrčelić, Merica Slišković

OPTIMISING THE REFERENCE POINT WITHIN A JOURNAL BEARING USING LASER ALIGNMENT

Ty Aaron Smith , Guixin Fan , Natalia Nikolova , Kiril Tenekedjiev

REVIEW OF THE CURRENT INCREASE OF NOISE UNIT COST VALUES IN TRANSPORT

Luka Vukić , Ivan Peronja , Mihaela Bukljaš , Alen Jugović

TARGET DETECTION FOR VISUAL COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM

Miro Petković, Danko Kezić, Igor Vujović, Ivan Pavić

NEW RESULTS FOR TEACHING SHIP HANDLING USING FAST TIME SIMULATION

Knud Benedict , MichŽle Schaub , Michael Baldauf , Michael Gluch , Matthias Kirchhoff , Caspar Krüger

POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF ELECTRICALY DRIVEN FERRY, CASE STUDY

Tina Perić, Ladislav Stazić, Karlo Bratić

SITUATIONAL AWARENESS – KEY SAFETY FACTOR FOR THE OFFICER OF THE WATCH

Hrvoje Jaram, Pero Vidan, Srđan Vukša, Ivan Pavić

Книжка 7
INCLUSIVE INTELLIGENCE

Dr. Aleksandar Krastev, Assist. Prof.

EDUCATION OF MORAL CULTURE OF STUDENT YOUTH IN THE CONDITIONS OF POLYCULTURAL SPACE

Dr. Natalia Bondarenko, Assoc. Prof. Yevhen Rozdymakha Dr. Lyudmila Oderiy, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Anatoly Rozdymakha, Assoc. Prof. Dilyana Arsova, PhD student

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN KOSOVO – RESEARCH OF TRAINING PROGRAMS AND TESTS

Bekim Samadraxha, Veton Alihajdari, Besim Mustafa, Ramë Likaj

Книжка 6s
EVALUATION OF CRUISER TRAFFIC VARIABLES IN SEAPORTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA

Maja Račić, Katarina Balić, Mira Pavlinović, Antonija Mišura

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CONTRACTS FOR MARITIME TRANSPORT SERVICES. CHAIN OF CHARTER PARTIES

Svetlana Dimitrakieva, Ognyan Kostadinov, Christiana Atanasova

THE LIGHTSHIP MASS CALCULATION MODEL OF A MERCHANT SHIP BY EMPIRICAL METHODS

Vedran Slapničar , Katarina Zadro , Viktor Ložar , Ivo Ćatipović

ON EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN MARITIME COMMUNICATIONS AND THE GMDSS DURING THE COVID-19

Chavdar Alexandrov, Grozdyu Grozev, Georgi Dimitrov, Avgustin Hristov

AIR POLLUTANT EMISSION MEASUREMENT

Nikola Račić, Branko Lalić, Ivan Komar, Frane Vidović, Ladislav Stazić

ASSESSMENT OF LNG BUNKERING ACCIDENTS

Peter Vidmar, Andrej Androjna

EGR OPERATION INFLUENCE ON THE MARINE ENGINE EFFICIENCY

Delyan Hristov, Ivan Ivanov, Dimitar Popov

THE MEASUREMENT OF EXHAUST GAS EMISSIONS BY TESTO 350 MARITIME – EXHAUST GAS ANALYZER

Bruna Bacalja, Maja Krčum, Tomislav Peša, Marko Zubčić

PROPELLER LOAD MODELLING IN THE CALCULATIONS OF MARINE SHAFTING TORSIONAL VIBRATIONS

Nenad Vulić, Karlo Bratić, Branko Lalić, Ladislav Stazić

MODELING OF THE DEPENDENCE OF CO

Hristo Hristov, Ivailo Bakalov, Bogdan Shopov, Dobromir Yovkov

TECHNICAL DIAGNOSTICS OF MARINE EQUIPMENT WITH PSEUDO-DISCRETE FEATURES

Guixin Fan , Natalia Nikolova , Ty Smith , Kiril Tenekedjiev

CONTRIBUTION TO THE REDUCTION OF THE SHIP’S SWITCHBOARD BY APPLYING SENSOR TECHNOLOGY

Nediljko Kaštelan, Marko Zubčić, Maja Krčum, Miro Petković

THE STAND FOR FIN DRIVES ENERGY TESTING

Andrzej Grządziela , Marcin Kluczyk , Tomislav Batur

INTRODUCTION OF 3D PRINTING INTO MARINE ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION – A CASE STUDY

Ivica Kuzmanić, Igor Vujović, Zlatan Kulenović, Miro Petković

SHIPYARD CRANE MODELING METHODS

Pawel Piskur, Piotr Szymak, Bartosz Larzewski

Книжка 6
TEACHERS' PERSPECTIVE ON THE EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF ONLINE TEACHING

Dr. Julien-Ferencz Kiss, Prof. Dr. Florica Orțan, Dr. Laurențiu Mˆndrea

ПСИХОЛОГО-ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ ПРАВИЛА, МОДЕЛИ НА ДОБРИ ПРАКТИКИ И ПРЕПОРЪКИ ПРИ РАБОТАТА И ОБУЧЕНИЕТО НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ С ПОВЕДЕНЧЕСКИ РАЗСТРОЙСТВА

Тричков, Ив., 2019. Психолого-педагогически правила, модели на добри прак- тики и препоръки при работата и обучението на деца и ученици

Книжка 5
ФИДАНА ДАСКАЛОВА ЗА ПЕДАГОГИКАТА

Маргарита Колева, Йордан Колев

ВОЕННОМОРСКОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ – ЕДИН РАЗЛИЧЕН ПОГЛЕД

Кожухаров, А. (2021). Личните академични документи на българската военна образователна система (1892 – 1946). Варна: ВВМУ, ISBN 978-619-7428-55-1

Книжка 4
Книжка 3
НЕВРОДИДАКТИКА

Наталия Витанова

ЗА АСИСТИРАЩИТЕ И ИНФОРМАЦИОННИТЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Сивакова, В. (2020). Асистиращи и информационни технологии

Книжка 2
ОВЛАДЯВАНЕ НА КЛЮЧОВИ КОМПЕТЕНЦИИ ПРИ ОРИЕНТИРАНЕ В СВЕТА

Стоянова, М. (2019). Овладяване на ключови компетенции при ориентиране в света. София: Авангард принт, ISBN 978-954-337-398-7 374

Книжка 1
BULGARIAN SCHOOL – SHOWCASE OF IDENTITY

Veska Gyuviyska, Nikolay Tsankov

ЗА ИЗБОРА НА УЧЕБЕН КОМПЛЕКТ ПО БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕЗИК И ЛИТЕРАТУРА В НАЧАЛЕН ЕТАП. И ЗА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО

Георгиева, А. (2020). Съвременни проекции на обучението по български език

КОНТРОЛ НА СТРЕСА. ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКИ И УПРАВЛЕНСКИ РАКУРСИ

Стоянов, В. (2020). Управление на стреса в организацията. Психологически и управленски ракурси. 198 cтр., Варна: Стено, ISBN 978-619-241-119-0

2020 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
EDUCATIONAL REASONS FOR EARLY SCHOOL DROP-OUT

Maria Teneva, Zlatka Zhelyazkova

Книжка 7s
TEACHING CHALLENGES IN SPORTS EDUCATION DURING THE PANDEMIC COVID-19

Evelina Savcheva, Galina Domuschieva-Rogleva

THE DIFFERENCES IN STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES ABOUT ONLINE TEACHING DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Aleksić Veljković Aleksandra , Slađana Stanković , Irena Golubović-Ilić , Katarina Herodek

ONLINE EDUCATION DURING PANDEMIC, ACCORDING TO STUDENTS FROM TWO BULGARIAN UNIVERSITIES

Antoaneta Getova¹ , Eleonora Mileva² , Boryana Angelova-Igova²

Книжка 7
ПОДГОТОВКАТА НА ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ КАДРИ ЗА ПРЕДУЧИЛИЩНИТЕ ВЪЗПИТАТЕЛНИ ЗАВЕДЕНИЯ ПРЕЗ ПЕРИОДА 1944 – 1991 ГОДИНА

Въчева, С. (2019). Подготовката на педагогически кадри за предучилищните възпитателни заведения през периода

ПАЗАРНИ МЕХАНИЗМИ В УЧИЛИЩНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ. ТЕОРЕТИКО-ПРИЛОЖНИ ВЪПРОСИ

Първанова, Й. (2020) Пазарни механизми в училищното образование. Теоретико-приложни въпроси. София: Колбис, ISBN 978-619-7284-35-5

Книжка 6
TEACHERS ATTITUDES ABOUT INTEGRATED APPROACH IN TEACHING

Emina Kopas-Vukašinović, Aleksandra Mihajlović, Olivera Cekić-Jovanović

Книжка 5
КОНЦЕПТУАЛНИ МОДЕЛИ ЗА РАЗРАБОТВАНЕ НА ПОЗНАВАТЕЛНИ ОНЛАЙН ИГРИ В ОБЛАСТТА НА КУЛТУРНОТО НАСЛЕДСТВО

Детелин Лучев, Десислава Панева-Мариновa, Радослав Павлов Гита Сенка Лилия Павлова

ТАЛАНТЛИВ ПЕДАГОГ И КУЛТУРЕН ДЕЕЦ

Севда Чобанова, Любен Десев

Книжка 4
A CONTINUUM OF APPROACHES TO SCHOOL INSPECTIONS: CASES FROM EUROPE

Rossitsa Simeonova, Yonka Parvanova Martin Brown, Sarah Gardezi, Joe O’Hara, Gerry McNamara Laura del Castillo Blanco Zacharoula Kechri, Eleni Beniata

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2019 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НА БЪДЕЩЕТО

Наталия Витанова

Книжка 7
МОДЕЛ НА РАБОТА В ИНТЕРКУЛТУРНА СРЕДА

(Научноизследователска саморефлексия)

RISK FACTORS FOR EARLY SCHOOL LEAVING IN BULGARIA

Elena Lavrentsova, Petar Valkov

ПРИНОСИ НА ЕЛКА ПЕТРОВА ЗА БЪЛГАРСКОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

(100 години от рождението на проф. д.п.н. Елка Петрова – 27.10.1919 – 21.12.2012)

НАСОКИ ЗА ПРИОБЩАВАНЕ НА МАРГИНАЛНИ СЕМЕЙНИ ОБЩНОСТИ В ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИТЕ ИНСТИТУЦИИ

Нунев, Й. (2019). Насоки за приобщаване на маргинални семейни общности в образователните институции. Велико Търново: Св. св. Кирил и Методий, ISBN 978-619-208-186-7

Книжка 6
ДИОФАНТОВИ УРАВНЕНИЯ И СИСТЕМИ ДИОФАНТОВИ УРАВНЕНИЯ – ТЕОРЕТИЧНИ АСПЕКТИ И МЕТОДИЧЕСКА ПРОЕКЦИЯ В НАЧАЛНИЯ ЕТАП НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Владимира Ангелова. (2018). Диофантови уравнения и системи диофантови уравнения – теоретични аспекти и методическа проекция в начален етап на образование. Пловдив: Паисий Хилендарски, ISBN 978-619-202-394-2

ЕДНА НОВА КНИГА ЗА ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИТЕ УМЕНИЯ НА УЧИТЕЛИТЕ

Николай Колишев. (2018). Теория на педагогическите умения на учителите. София: Захарий Стоянов, ISBN: 9789540912066

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА ИЗСЛЕДОВАТЕЛСКИЯ ПОДХОД ПРИ ОБУЧЕНИЕ НА СТУДЕНТИ ПЕДАГОЗИ

(върху примера на обучение по академичната дисциплина „Съвременни аспекти на гражданското образование“ на студенти педагози)

LEARNING MATURITY

Alina G“mbuță Daniela-Carmen Berințan Marijana Mikulandra Krzysztof Kij Katja Sivka

Книжка 2
ДЕТЕТО И ПЕДАГОГИКАТА

Рашева-Мерджанова, Ян., Петкова, Ил. & Господинов, Вл. (съст.). (2018). Детето и педагогиката. София: Просвета, ISBN 978-954-01-3806-0

Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ КОЛЕГИ,

Редакционната колегия на списание „Педаго- гика“ ви честити Новата 2019 година! Пожела- ваме ви от сърце тя да бъде щастлива, успешна и благословена! През отминалата юбилейна 2018 г. публику- вахме редица стойностни материали на универ- ситетски преподаватели, учители, разнородни специалисти, работещи в сферата на образова- нието, докторанти. Отбелязани бяха поредица от тематични конференции и юбилейни празни- ци. Получихме и международно признание чрез включването на списанието

УЧЕНИЧЕСКО САМОУПРАВЛЕНИЕ

Желязкова-Тея, Т. & Банчева, М. (2018). Ученическото самоуправление. София: Аз-буки. ISBN: 978-619-7065-20-6

2018 година
Книжка 9
ПРАВАТА НА ДЕТЕТО ПРЕЗ ПОГЛЕДА НА СТУДЕНТИ ПЕДАГОЗИ

Йорданка Николова, Даниела Рачева

Книжка 8
СПОДЕЛЕНО МНЕНИЕ

Николова, М. & Михалева, Б. (2018). С увереност срещу агресията и кон-

Книжка 7
РАДОСТТА ОТ ОБЩУВАНЕТО НА ЧУЖД ЕЗИК В ДЕТСТВОТО

Екатерина Софрониева, Христина Белева

НОВО ТЕОРЕТИКО-ПРАКТИЧЕСКО ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА ДЕТСКОТО ТВОРЧЕСТВО

Енгелс-Критидис, Р. (2018). Децата и творчеството. Юбилеен сборник в чест

ПРОФ. Д-Р ЕЛЕНА РУСИНОВА-БАХУДЕЙЛА

Розалина Енгелс-Критидис

Книжка 6
ПОЗИТИВНА УЧЕБНА СРЕДА

Валентина Шарланова

SENIOR CITIZENS’ EXISTENTIAL NEEDS AND EDUCATION FOR THE MEANING OF LIFE

Joanna Łukasik, Norbert Pikuła, Katarzyna Jagielska

Книжка 5
ПЛАНОМЕРНО ПСИХИЧЕСКО РАЗВИТИЕ

(По случай 115 г. от рождението на П.Я. Галперин)

ПАРАДИГМАТА СЕМИОТИКА – ЕЗИК – ДЕТЕ ПРИ 6 – 7-ГОДИШНИТЕ

Жоржетина Атанасова, Любимка Габрова

ПАРАРОДИТЕЛСКАТА ГРИЖА ВЪВ ФОКУСА НА ЕДИН СОЦИАЛНОПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ АНАЛИЗ

Ковачка, Ю. (2017). Социалнопедагогически проблеми при деца с парародителска грижа. Благоевград: УИ „Неофит Рилски“, 144 стр. ISBN: 9789540001340

Книжка 4
ДЕТСКИ КОНФЕРЕНЦИИ

Боряна Иванова

СТЕРЕОТИПИЗАЦИЯ НА ЕТНИЧЕСКИТЕ ВЗАИМООТНОШЕНИЯ ПРИ СЪВРЕМЕННИТЕ МЛАДИ БЪЛГАРИ

Зорница Ганева. (2017). Стереотипизация на етническите взаимоотношения при съвременните млади българи. София: Елестра. ISBN 978-619-7292-03-9

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
СЪВРЕМЕННИ МЕТАМОРФОЗИ НА ВЗАИМООТНОШЕНИЯТА В ДЕТСКАТА ГРУПА

Веселина Иванова, Виолета Кърцелянска-Станчева

SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES AS SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS

Emilj Sulejmani Shikjerije Sulejmani

ОТНОСНО УСЕТА ЗА БРОЕНЕ

Петър Петров, Мима Трифонова

Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ КОЛЕГИ И ПРИЯТЕЛИ,

Редакционната колегия на сп.„Педагогика“ Ви честити Новата 2018 г. Пожелаваме ви тя да бъде здрава, щедра и благословена! Тази година списанието чества своя юбилей – 90 години от неговото публикуване за първи път през 1928 г. с името „Народна просвета“. От деня на създаване до сега, то отразява актуал- ните проблеми на педагогическата наука и прак- тика и остава верен спътник на хиляди научни работници, учители, докторанти. Вярваме, че силата на творческата ни енергия ще пом

ДОБРИ ПРАКТИКИ „ПАРТНЬОРСТВО РОДИТЕЛИ – УЧИЛИЩЕ“

Мехмед Имамов, Калинка Гайтанинчева

2017 година
Книжка 9
ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКОТО УЧЕНИЕ НА Й. ФР. ХЕРБАРТ – ИСТОРИЯ И СЪВРЕМЕННОСТ

(По повод 240 г. от неговото рождение) Невена Филипова

Книжка 8
ЧЕТЯЩИЯТ СТУДЕНТ, ЧЕТЯЩОТО ДЕТЕ – ЕДНО МАЛКО ПРОЗОРЧЕ, ЕДНА ВЕЛИЧЕСТВЕНА ГЛЕДКА

Мариана Мандева, Боряна Туцева, Габриела Николова, Цветелина Ковачева

Книжка 7
ДИДАКТИЧЕСКИ КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТИ

Нели Митева, Наталия Витанова

Илияна Кунева

Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ИЗСЛЕДОВАТЕЛСКО ОБУЧЕНИЕ В АКАДЕМИЧНА СРЕДА

(Научно-теоретична рефлексия) Румяна Неминска

ПРИНОС В ПСИХОЛОГИЯТА НА ТВОРЧЕСТВОТО

(120 години от рождението на Лев Семьонович Виготски) Любен Десев

ЛЕВ СEМЬОНОВИЧ ВИГОТСКИ – ПСИХОЛОГ И НА ХХI ВЕК

(по случай 120 години от рождението му)

ИСКУССТВО В ЖИЗНИ ЛЮДЕЙ

Гульнар Омарова

НОВА И ПОЛЕЗНА КНИГА

Йонка Първанова

ПРИНОСЕН ТРУД КЪМ МЕТОДИКАТА НА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО ПО БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕЗИК И ЛИТЕРАТУРА В НАЧАЛНОТО УЧИЛИЩЕ

М. Мандева (2017). Методика на обучението по български език и литература – I – IV клас. Начално ограмотяване. В. Търново: УИ „Св. св. Кирил и Методий“, 120 стр.

ЕДНО ФУНДАМЕНТАЛНО ИНТЕГРАЛНО ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА РОЛЯТА НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО ЗА РАЗВИТИЕТО НА НООСФЕРНИЯ ИНТЕЛЕКТ

Марга Георгиева, Сава Гроздев. (2016). Морфодинамиката за развитието на ноосферния интелект. София: Изток-Запад, ISBN 978-619-152-869-1

Книжка 4
Книжка 3
СИСТЕМАТИЧНО ВЪВЕДЕНИЕ В ОБЩАТА И ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКАТА СИНЕРГЕТИКА

Любен Десев (2015). Синергетика. Въведение и речник. 777 термина. София: ИК „Екопрогрес“. 464 с. ISBN 978-954-2970-37-8

Книжка 2
ПРОБЛЕМИ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВИ В РАЗВИТИЕТО НА ХУДОЖЕСТВЕНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ У НАС ПРЕЗ ПОГЛЕДА НА ДЕТСКИЯ И НАЧАЛНИЯ УЧИТЕЛ

Теодора Власева, Даниела Гирджева-Валачева, Мария Калоферова, Найден Младенов, Илияна Шотлекова

ЗАКЪСНЯЛО ПРИЗНАНИЕ

Доц. д-р Емилия Николова

Книжка 1
ФАКТОРИ ЗА УСПЕШНО ПРИЛАГАНЕ НА СМЕСЕНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова Лъчезар Лазаров

ЗА СТОПЛЕНИТЕ ПЪТЕКИ КЪМ ЛИТЕРАТУРНОТО ПОЗНАНИЕ

Радев, Радослав. 2015. Технология на методите в обучението по литература. Варна: Славена, 247 с., ISBN 978-619-190-041-1

2016 година
Книжка 9
ИНТЕРАКТИВНИ ТЕХНИКИ ЗА ОВЛАДЯВАНЕ НА ЧЕТЕНЕТО В МУЛТИКУЛТУРНАТА КЛАСНА СТАЯ – ПЪРВИ КЛАС

ФОРМИРАНЕ НА РЕЧЕВА КУЛТУРА, В НАЧАЛНА УЧИЛИЩНА ВЪЗРАСТ, (АНАЛИЗ НА АНКЕТА С УЧИТЕЛИ

Кампания

на Института за български език – БАН, и вестник „Аз-буки“

Книжка 8
Книжка 7
IBM SPSS STATISTICS ПРЕЗ ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИЯ ПОГЛЕД НА ДОЦ. Д-Р ЗОРНИЦА ГАНЕВА

Зорница Ганева (2016). Да преоткрием статистиката с IBM SPSS Statistics. София: Елестра. 712 стр. ISBN 978-619-7292-01-5

НАЧАЛНОТО ОГРАМОТЯВАНЕ – „КЛЮЧ“ ЗА УСПЕШЕН ЖИВОТ В ПРОМЕНЯЩИЯ СЕ СВЯТ

Мариана Мандева, Диляна Гаджева (2016). Начално ограмотяване

ОТ „ЧУДНА И ДИВНА ДАСКАЛЕТИНКА“ ДО ПЕДАГОГИКА ЗА НАЦИОНАЛНО СЛУЧВАНЕ

Виолета Атанасова (2015) Петко Славейков за образованието. Шумен: Унивeрситетско издателство „Епископ Константин Преславски. 208 с. ISBN 978-619-201-051-5

Книжка 6
УЧИЛИЩЕ ЗА ЧЕТЕНЕ

Петя Георгиева

Кампания

на Института за български език – БАН, и в. „Аз Буки“

ДОШЛА ЛИ Е ИНСПЕКТОРЪТ?

Ванина Сумрова

ЩЕ ТЕ ЧАКАМ В/НА ЦЕНТЪРА

Илияна Гаравалова

ПРАВО В ДЕСЕТКАТА

Ивелина Стоянова

ПРОФ.Д.П.Н. СТОЯНКА ЖЕКОВА

Редколегия на сп. „Педагогика“

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
СИНЕРГЕТИКА – НОВО НАУЧНО ПОЗНАНИЕ

(Синергетика – въведение и речник, София: ИК Екопрогрес, 2015 г.)

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
НОВА ДИНАМИЧНА МОДИФИКАЦИЯ В ГРАНИЦИТЕ НА „АЗ-КОНЦЕПЦИЯТА“ НА МАТЕМАТИЧЕСКОТО МОДЕЛИРАНЕ

Марга Георгиева & Сава Гроздев. (2015). Морфодинамиката за развитието на ноосферния интелект, София: Марга Георгиева. 323 стр. ISBN 9786199052204

Книжка 1
IN MEMORIAM

На 10.12.2015 г. ни напусна нашият колега и приятел проф. д-р Иван Пет ков Иванов. Той беше уважаван учен и експерт в областта на педагогическите науки – автор на 10 монографии, 8 учебника, 10 учебни помагала, 6 студии и над 100 статии в специализирани периодич- ни издания и научни сборници; участник в 28 между- народни и национални проекта; председател и член на експертни групи към НАОА, член на редакционната ко- легия на сп. „Педагогика“. Проф. д-р Иван Иванов беше уважаван и оби

2015 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
РУСЕНСКИЯТ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ

Златоживка Здравкова

Книжка 7
ДИСКУСИЯТА В УРОКА ПО ЛИТЕРАТУРА

Огняна Георгиева-Тенева

Книжка 6
УЧИТЕЛЯТ ПРАВИ УЧИЛИЩЕТО

ЕЗИКОВАТА ГРАМОТНОСТ НА МАЛКИЯ УЧЕНИК – „КЛЮЧ“ ЗА ОТГОВОРЕН И УСПЕШЕН ЖИВОТ В ПРОМЕНЯЩИЯ СЕ СВЯТ

ГОТОВНОСТ ЗА ОГРАМОТЯВАНЕ

Екатерина Чернева

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЕ МЕЖДУ ИСТОРИЯ, АКАДЕМИЗЪМ И РЕАЛНИ ПРАКТИКИ В СОЦИАЛНОПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКАТА ДЕЙНОСТ

Академични полета на социалната педагогика, съставител: проф. д.п.н. Клавдия Сапунджиева, научна редакция: проф. дпн Клавдия Сапунджиева, проф. д-р Нели Бояджиева, гл. ас. д-р Марина Пиронкова,

НОВА КНИГА

Клавдия Сапунджиева

Книжка 2
ПРОБЛЕМИ НА СОЦИАЛНАТА АДАПТАЦИЯ НА ПЪТУВАЩИ УЧЕНИЦИ ОТ МАЛКИ НАСЕЛЕНИ МЕСТА1)

Траян Попкочев, Бонка Гергинова, Тереза Карамангалова

Турнир по канадска борба [Arm Wrestling Competition] / Д. Евтимова,

Д. Евтимова, Е. Павлова, И. Радославова и Б. Иванов

Книжка 1
ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: THEORY AND REALITY

Inna Leonidovna Fedotenko

ОТЗИВ ЗА КНИГАТА „ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЕН ДИЗАЙН (КОНЦЕПТУАЛНИ ОСНОВАНИЯ И ПРАКТИЧЕСКИ РЕШЕНИЯ)“

Димова, Д. (2013). Образователен дизайн (концептуални основания

2014 година
Книжка 9
„СОФИЯ – УЧЕЩ СЕ ГРАД“ – МОБИЛЕН СЕМИНАР В ПОДКРЕПА НА НЕФОРМАЛНОТО УЧЕНЕ И ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ В ОБЩНОСТТА

ПЕТЪР ДЪНОВ (БЕИНСÀ ДУНÒ Е И БЕЛЕЖИТ, ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ МИСЛИТЕЛ-ХУМАНИСТ, (ПО ПОВОД НА 0-ГОДИШНИНАТА ОТ РОЖДЕНИЕТО, И 70 ГОДИНИ ОТ КОНЧИНАТА МУ

НА УЧИЛИЩЕ – С УСМИВКА!

Снежана Якимова

НА УЧИЛИЩЕ – С УСМИВКА!

Снежана Якимова

УЧИТЕЛЯТ – ЕТАЛОН ЗА ФОРМИРАНЕ НА ДЕТСКАТА ЛИЧНОСТ

Катя Коруджийска, Янка Маринкова

Книжка 8
Книжка 7
ЗАЕДНО МОЖЕМ ПОВЕЧЕ

Диана Смиленова

Книжка 6
УСПЕШНИЯТ УЧИТЕЛ – МЕЖДУ ПРОФЕСИОНАЛНАТА НОРМА И СТРАСТТА ДА ПРЕПОДАВАШ

Проф. д-р Ангел Петров е преподавател по методика на обучението по български език в СУ „Св. Климент Охридски“. Ръководител е на най- старата катедра по методика на филологически- те дисциплини в страната – Катедрата по ме-

Книжка 5
ВЪЗГЛЕДИТЕ НА ЖАН-ЖАК РУСО И ЛЮБЕН КАРАВЕЛОВ ЗА ВЪЗПИТАНИЕТО

Посвещава се на 180-ата годишнина от рождението на Любен Каравелов (1834 – 1879) Виолета Атанасова

LE PROJET PÉDAGOGIQUE, SOURCE DE MOTIVATION DANS L’ENSEIGNEMENT ET L’APPRENTISSAGE DU FLE

THE EDUCATIONAL PROJECT, MEANS OF MOTIVATION IN TEACHING AND LEARNING FLE

LA PÉDAGOGIE DU PROJET ET LA MOTIVATION DES ÉLÈVES POUR L’APPRENTISSAGE DU FRANÇAIS

PROJECT PEDAGOGY AND PUPILS’ MOTIVATION IN LEARNING FRENCH

Книжка 4
КАЖДЫЙ ДЛЯ МЕНЯ УЧИТЕЛЬ

Ш.А.Амонашвили

Книжка 3
АНТОАНЕТА ЙОВЧЕВА (1952 – 2014)

След трудна борба с тежката болест ни напусна един добър и мил човек, една светла личност – Анто- анета Йовчева, нашата обичана колежка Тони. Нейните колеги и приятели, многобройните автори и сътрудници на сп. „Начално образование“ и на сп. „Педагогика“ ще запазят завинаги спомена за нейната приветлива усмивка, за нейната отзивчивост и преда- ност към работата, за нейната широка култура и стре- меж към познание, към развитие. Родена на 20 март 1952 г. в София в интелигентно се- мей

Книжка 2
ПОСТМОДЕРНИЗЪМ И ВЪЗПИТАНИЕ

Клавдия Сапунджиева

ДЕТСКИ УНИВЕРСИТЕТИ

Боряна Иванова

ПРОФ. Д-Р ЕЛКА ПЕТРОВА

Има личности, в сиянието на които се оглеж- дат цяла плеада последователи, възпитаници, колеги; има личности, без които животът става по беден, дните по-еднообразни, защото в сър- цето остава празно място. Такава личност е професор, доктор на педа- гогическите науки Елка Петрова – най–големият ерудит в областта на предучилищното възпита - ние, учен с международно значение. Дълги години ще свеждаме глави пред нейна- та обаятелна личност, с искрена признателност ще си спомняме свидните

МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЙ ЦЕНТР ГУМАННОЙ ПЕДАГОГИКИ

Международният център „Хуманна педагогика“ организира XIII педаго- гически четения в периода 20 – 23.03.2014 г. в гр.Тбилиси, Грузия. Форумът се организира със съдействието на грузинското правителство. „Учителят“ е темата, която ще обедини участниците: учители, експерти, родители, универ- ситетски преподаватели, представители на педагогическата общност от мно- го страни, за да се осъществи дискусия за мисията на съвременния учител в съвременния образователен контекст. Ръководството на

Книжка 1
ОСНОВНИ ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКИ НА МОБИЛНОТО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова Лъчезар Лазаров

2013 година
Книжка 9
УЧИТЕЛИ ВЪЗРОЖДЕНЦИ В ТЪРНОВО

Венка Кутева-Цветкова

Книжка 8
ДИМИТЪР ДОНЧЕВ – С ВЪЗХИТА ЗА БЪЛГАРСКИЯ УЧИТЕЛ

100 ГОДИНИ ОТ РОЖДЕНИЕТО НА ДИМИТЪР ЕВСТАТИЕВ ДОНЧЕВ (5.10.1913 – 15.02.1997)

Книжка 7
„СЛЪНЦЕТО“ НА ВЪЗПИТАТЕЛНАТА СИСТЕМА В ТВУ – РАКИТОВО

85 ГОДИНИ ОТ РОЖДЕНИЕТО НА АНГЕЛ УЗУНОВ (1928 – 1999)

ЦЕННОСТИ И ДУХОВНО-НРАВСТВЕНО РАЗВИТИЕ НА МАЛКИЯ УЧЕНИК

Марияна Ешкенази, Гергана Фиданова, Марияна Вишева, Цветанка Годжилова

МАЛКИЯТ УЧЕНИК ЧЕТЕ

Марияна Механджиева Венета Велева

С БАБА И ДЯДО В КЛАС

Цветелин Горанов, Таня Илиева, Цветанка Берова, Нели Иванова, Борка Бончева

РОД РОДА НЕ ХРАНИ, НО ТЕЖКО МУ, КОЙТО ГО НЯМА!

Диляна Вачкова Евелина Димитрова

ДА ПОМОГНЕМ НА ДЕЦАТА ДА ОТВОРЯТ СЪРЦАТА СИ

Иванка Дебелушина Нина Маврикова

ДОБРОТО Е У ВСЕКИ

Мария Наскова

ОТЛИЧЕН ПЕДАГОГ, ПСИХОЛОГ И ПСИХОТЕРАПЕВТ

ДОЦ. СВЕТОСЛАВ СТАМЕНОВ (1939 – 2013)

Книжка 6
ТЕОРЕТИКО-ПРИЛОЖНИ ПРОБЛЕМИ НА КОНСТРУИРАНЕТО НА ТЕСТ ЗА НАЦИОНАЛНО ВЪНШНО ОЦЕНЯВАНЕ ПО „ЧОВЕКЪТ И ОБЩЕСТВОТО“ ЗА 4. КЛАС (2013)

Ваня Петрова, Цонка Каснакова, Мариан Делчев Жана Минчева Радостина Стоянова, Рада Димитрова Мария Темникова

MEDIA IN PRESCHOOL AGE OF CHILD’S LIFE

Sonja Petrovska Jadranka Bocvarova

Книжка 5
ШАЛВА АЛЕКСАНДРОВИЧ АМОНАШВИЛИ – УЧИТЕЛ ОТ БЪДЕЩЕТО

В сложното битие на науката и метамор- фозите на социалната реалност, неотменими и общовалидни остават само най-стойностни- те постижения и безспорни истини, които не само маркират и остойностяват територията на човешко познание, но извисяват самия чо- век, поддържат неговата вяра в доброто, под- хранват чувството му за собствена значимост, укрепват неговия дух. Приемайки извечните послания на класи- ческата философско-педагогическа мъдрост и дълбоко обвързан с педагогическата р

МАНИФЕСТ ГУМАННОЙ ПЕДАГОГИКИ

Преамбула 25 лет тому назад группа учителей новаторов провозгласила манифест „Пе- дагогика сотрудничества“ (Переделкино, 1986 год). В последующие годы были опубликованы отчеты встреч учителей новаторов, в которых рассматри- вались разные аспекты педагогики сотрудничества: „Демократизация лично- сти“ (Цинандали, Телавский район, Грузия, 1987 год), „Методика обновления“ (Москва, 1988 год), „Войдем в новую школу“ (Краснодарский край, 1988 год). Идеи педагогики сотрудничества воодушевленно

ПОРТФОЛИОТО НА УЧЕНИКА КАТО ПРОЦЕС НА САМОПОЗНАНИЕ

Радка Топалска Емилия Вълкова, Албена Атанасова

ДОПИРНИ СВЕТОВЕ

Албена Димитрова Стилияна Гронева

ПРЕДИ ГОДИНА И СЕГА

Веселка Аршинкова

Книжка 4
СВЕЩЕНИК ГЕОРГИ МАРИНОВ ПОЛУГАНОВ – ОСНОВАТЕЛЯТ НА УЧИЛИЩЕТО И ПЪРВИЯТ УЧИТЕЛ В ПОЛИКРАЙЩЕ

Георги Георгиев Трифонка Попниколова Марияна Георгиева–Гроссе

ЕВРОПЕЙСКИ ПРИКАЗКИ

Светла Попова

Книжка 3
ДА ОПАЗИМ ДЕТСКОТО ЗДРАВЕ!

Мая Топалова, Симона Пейчева

КАК ДА ОТГЛЕДАМЕ МАЛЪК ПРИРОДОЛЮБИТЕЛ?

Мадлена Николова Ани Цветкова

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
ИЗКУСТВОТО ЗА ПРЕВЕНЦИЯ НА АГРЕСИВНОТО ПОВЕДЕНИЕ НА ДЕЦАТА

Евгения Миланова Виолета Николова Величка Радева

ПРИЯТЕЛСТВОТО В ЖИВОТА НА ДЕТЕТО

Даниела Димитрова Красимира Василева

ПРЕДАЙ НАТАТЪК

Вилдан Мехмедова

ЗАЕДНО ДА БЪДЕМ ДОБРИ

(ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКА СИТУАЦИЯ В ПОДГОТВИТЕЛНА ГРУПА)

ПРОФ. ДПН EЛКА ПЕТРОВА EДНА НЕЗАЛИЧИМА СЛЕДА В БЪЛГАРСКОТО ПРЕДУЧИЛИЩНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ (1919 – 2012)

Почина проф. дпн Елка Петрова (20.ХІІ.2012 г.) – на- шата любима учителка по изкуството да се живее пъл- ноценно и професионално, създателката на науката за предучилищното възпитание на българските деца, пре- красната жена и велика майка, Неповторима, единствена, съвършена – това е нашата Елка: Примерът за всички нас – хилядите нейни студенти и последователи ! Елка Петрова винаги е първа, винаги е оригинална и авангардна; през 1950–1952 г. поставя началото на Висшия мето

2012 година
Книжка 9
ПЕДАГОГЪТ – РИЦАР НА ДЕТСТВОТО

Януш Корчак бе написал, че животът на великите хора е като легендите: труден, но красив. И се оказва пророчески прав, сякаш е писал за себе си! Наследник на семейство с богата духовна култура и традиции, останал отрано без баща, той не просто се справя с несгодите на сирачеството, но развива у себе си три могъщи извора на живот: любов към свободата и справедливостта, страст към знанието и творчеството, отдаденост на децата и тяхното щастие. Лекарят Корчак лекува децата и душите им. Безплатн

ЯНУШ КОРЧАК – ВЕЛИК ХУМАНИСТ И ПЕДАГОГ

„Със сила и мощ поведох своя живот, който беше привидно неподреден, самотен и чужд. За син избрах идеята да служа на детето и неговото дело. Привидно загубих.“ Бе лекар, писател, мислител. Бе философ, учен, моралист. Издател. Възпи- тател и педагог. Бе герой. Бе скромен. Във всяка от тези области той има изключителни постижения. В течение на по- вече от четиридесет години работи като педагог и писател. Четиридесет години безкористно служене на слабите и беззащитните. Създава съвременна кон

ЕВОЛЮЦИЯ НА ПРАВАТА НА ДЕТЕТО

„Детето има право на сериозно отношение към проблемите му, на справедливото им решаване.“

THE KORCZAK’S RIGHT TO SOCIAL PARTICIPATION OF CHILDREN THE CITIZENSHIP OF CHILDREN

A speech by Marek Michalak, the Ombudsman for Children, given during the seminar„The Polish-Israeli pioneer in the fi eld of human rights, Janusz Korczak (1879–1942) and today’s Convention on Children’s Rights as the part of the international law“, Geneva, the 6 of June 2009

ЗА ДЕТЕТО, ДЕТСТВОТО ИЛИ НАУКА ЗА НЕГО?

В памет на Януш Корчак – по повод 70 г. от неговата смърт и 100 г. от създаването на „Дом за сираци“ във Варшава Албена Чавдарова

Книжка 8
CHANGES IN UNIVERSITY TEACHING – THE ROAD FROM KNOWLEDGE TO COMPETENCIES

Slađana Anđelković Zorica Stanisavljević Petrović

ДОСТОЕН ЖИВОТ, ОТДАДЕН НА ПРОСВЕЩЕНИЕТО… ПРОФ. СТОЙКА ЗДРАВКОВА – ЕДИН СЪВРЕМЕНЕН БУДИТЕЛ НА 70 ГОДИНИ

Неуморна и взискателна! Енергична и всеотдай- на! Работохолик и перфекционист! Това е проф. д-р Стойка Здравкова! Не е за вярване, че в началото на ноември 2012 година навърши 70 години. И не е слу- чайно това, че тази светла дата е непосредствено бли- зо до Деня на будителите. А това, че проф . Здравкова е съвременен български будител, е толкова безспорно и видимо! 70–годишнината ù е един чудесен повод ретрос- пективно да си припомним и проследим най-значи-

Книжка 7
ОЧАКВАНА И ПОЛЕЗНА

Емилия Василева

Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ЦЕННО ПОМАГАЛО ЗА ПСИХОЛОЗИ И ПЕДАГОЗИ (Надежден инструмент за диагностициране смисъла на живота)

Любен Десев Минчев, Борис. Тест на Дж. Крумбъг и Л. Махолик за смисъл в живота. Българска версия. Варна, ВСУ „Черноризец Храбър“,

ГЕОРГИ MАВРОВ ЖИВОТ, ОТДАДЕН НА НАУКАТА И ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Така най-общо, но и най-точно можем да охарак- теризираме дейността на ст. н. с. д-р Георги Петков Мавров. Той ни напусна неочаквано в края на април т.г. И до последния си ден не преставаше да се вълнува от проблемите на образованието. Споделяше инте- ресни мисли относно предстоящото приемане на За- кона за образованието. Пестелив на думи, но щедър на дела – това ясно проличава от неговата богата би- ография.

Книжка 4
ОЩЕ ЕДНА ИДЕЯ

Галина Стоянова

Книжка 3
С ИНОВАТИВЕН ПОГЛЕД КЪМ ЛИЧНОСТТА НА ДЕТЕТО

Маргарита Абрашева Любимка Габрова

БИЗНЕС ОБУЧЕНИЕ В ДЕТСКАТА ГРАДИНА

Красимира Костова Петя Драгоданова

ДЕТСКАТА БЕЗОПАСНОСТ

Любимка Габрова

БАБА ПРИКАЗКИ РАЗКАЗВА... (МИКС ОТ ПРИКАЗКИ)

Кева Захариева, Мария Мичева

Книжка 2
ДЕТЕ ПЪТУВА В АВТОМОБИЛА

Красимира Михайлова

ПРОТИВОПОСТАВЯНЕ

Пюрвя Ердниев, Б. Ердниев

ЗДРАВКА НОВАКОВА – ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛ И ТВОРЕЦ

Седемдесетгодишният юбилей е вълнуващ повод да проследим трудния, богат и съдържателен професионално-творчески път на доц. д-р Здравка Новакова, да под- чертаем нейната важна роля за утвърждаване на дидактика на математиката като

IN MEMORIAM Иван Марев

Напусна ни проф. Иван Марев – философ, педагог, демократ, родолюбец. В далечната 1975 г., зареден с енергия, пълен с идеи, той създаде в Техническия

Книжка 1
ДЕЛЕГИРАНЕ НА ПРАВА ЧРЕЗ КОМИСИИТЕ В ДЕТСКАТА ГРАДИНА

Маргарита Абрашева Политиката, наречена управление на качеството, не е самоцел, нито поредна обра- зователна „мода“. Тя е практически необходима за поддържане от директора на учеб- ното заведение на един привлекателен образ в условията на конкуренция на пазара на учебни заведения. Това се отнася най-вече за детските градини. Политиката на упра- вление на качеството съдържа недостатъчно използван ресурс, включително за спечел- ване и запазване доверието на потребителя – родителите на децата,

ИНОВАЦИОННИ И ИНТЕРАКТИВНИ МЕТОДИ В КВАЛИФИКАЦИОННАТА ДЕЙНОСТ НА ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИЯ КОЛЕКТИВ

Стоилка Ташева, Севда Лукайчева Развиващото се с динамични темпове общество в днешно време налага необ- ходимостта от иновационни промени в областта на образованието. И в предучи- лищната педагогика все по-често се търсят алтернативни педагогически техноло- гии както за възпитанието и обучението на децата, така и при провеждането на квалификационната дейност на самите педагози. Използването на интерактивните методи дава възможност да се възлагат за- дачи, които предполагат съвместна работа,

ТОВА ТРЯБВА ДА ГО ЗНАЕ ВСЯКО ДЕТЕ

Татяна Атанасова, Иванка Пампова

НА УЛИЦАТА Е ОПАСНО

Таня Янчева, Зоя Кацарова