Педагогика

https://doi.org/10.53656/ped2025-5.02

2025/5, стр. 619 - 633

COMPETENCE FOR SOCIAL PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICE: WHAT DO STUDENTS TELL US?

Maya Tcholakova
OrcID: 0000-0002-1446-1399
WoSID: IWE-4455-2023
E-mail: mlcholakov@uni-sofia.bg
Department of Social Pedagogy and Social Work
Faculty of Educational Studies and the Arts
Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”
Sofia Bulgaria
Marina Pironkova
OrcID: 0000-0002-3732-7037
WoSID: AAD-7645-2021
E-mail: m.pironkova@fppse.uni-sofia.bg
Department of Social Pedagogy and Social Work
Faculty of Educational Studies and the Arts
Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”
Sofia Bulgaria
Aleksandar Ranev
OrcID: 0000-0002-7818-2196
E-mail: a.ranev@fppse.uni-sofia.bg
Department of Social Pedagogy and Social Work
Faculty of Educational Studies and the Arts
Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”
Sofia Bulgaria
Yana Staneva
OrcID: 0000-0003-0536-8122
E-mail: jpstaneva@uni-sofia.bg
Department of Social Pedagogy and Social Work
Faculty of Educational Studies and the Arts
Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”
Sofia Bulgaria

Резюме: The introduction of the competency-based approach in universities in Bulgaria is part of the higher education reform linked to the creation of competencе profiles. Involving students as partners in the process of defining the competencies to be mastered for their effective self-realization in the profession helps achieving this task. Aim: exploring students’ opinions regarding the basic competencies inherent to and necessary for the social pedagogue to develop during academic training. Instruments: questionnaire and focus group. 114 undergraduates in Social Pedagogy participated in the survey. 20 undergraduates participated in 3 focus groups. The processing of the survey data was done using frequency and quantitative analysis, and the transcripts of the focus group discussions were subjected to content analysis. Results: Students identified a set of personal, social, and professional competencies as highly necessary and important to emphasize in their training. The results will be used to reflect on and modify the curricula in the direction of competency-based learning.

Ключови думи: competence; competency based education; social pedagogy; student participation

Introduction

The competency-based approach introduced in higher education reflects the need for students to learn at university what is relevant to the needs of the labour market (Brauer 2021; Koenen, Dochy, Berghmans 2015; Velikova 2022). The job market for future social pedagogues/educators is diverse and rich in opportunities, and “social educational work involves intervention in other people’s conditions of life and requires a solid basic education as well as training in order to carry out this task in a professional and appropriate manner”.

Different approaches to defining the competencies that students should acquire in the course of their academic studies are described. According to Gervais (2016), competencies are determined based on feedback from all stakeholders, including teachers, students, and community partners. They can be developed entirely by faculty, prepared by professional organizations, or by outside experts (McIntyre-Hite 2016). Research on effective practices for developing competency-based models of learning in higher education has shown the need to gather input from multiple stakeholders (i.e., employers, professional standards, and faculty) (McIntyre-Hite 2016, p. 162). In most cases, it is university authorities who initiate the work of creating competencies, but student input is often sought for legitimacy purposes (Elatia, Ipperciel 2015, p. 10).

Competency-based education (CBE) ultimately aims to improve student motivation and engagement in the learning process (Brauer 2021). Learners are placed at the centre of the education enterprise, and in turn, they take responsibility for understanding and optimising their learning experience (Curry, Docherty 2017, p. 65). In CBE, “students set the pace and focus of the learning process; they continually measure their own progress and are responsible for choosing individualized and targeted learning activities” (Simonds, Behrens, Holzbauer 2017, p. 413). To facilitate learning, educators need to know learners’ strengths and areas that need improvement (McIntyre-Hite 2016).

In this context, the role of students as active learners, motivated and taking responsibility in the process of their learning, requires both a full understanding and awareness of the competencies that the profession requires and a focus on those that students identify as particularly significant for their own effective self-realisation in different professional roles. This is important in terms of their identification with the chosen profession and is particularly relevant for undergraduate learners. Furthermore, activе participation in the learning process is key to engaging students as partners. Involving them in defining the competencies they need to develop in their university education helps achieve this goal. Student empowerment and participation as partners in higher education has been gaining traction in recent years, particularly in relation to hybrid learning in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic (Lohse 2023, Zou et al. 2023). It can also be introduced when exploring changes in training towards a competency-based approach in higher education in Social Pedagogy.

The article aims to present the results of a study of the views of Social Pedagogy undergraduates at Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski” regarding the essential competencies that they think are necessary and should be developed during their studies given the requirements of the profession. The study was conducted for the purpose of the project “Competence-based approach in the training of students in Social Pedagogy”, aimed at improving the quality of their learning.

Competencies and Competence-Based Education (CBE)

The concept of competence is what links education and real practice. Despite the implementation of competency-based learning not only in school and vocational education but also in higher education in recent decades, the concept of “competence” has been interpreted differently (Berkovska 2014; Koenen, Dochy, & Berghmans 2015; Milkova 2015; Mulder, Gulikers, Biemans, & Wesselink 2008; Velikova 2022). Competence is most often defined as a dynamic set of knowledge, skills, attitudes, and relationships that are acquired in the process of learning, that is, those that are developed through high-quality learning, in an appropriate pedagogical environment, and through the acquisition of substantial practical experience (Zwell 2000). It is considered that for educational discourse, including in higher education, a distinction should be made between competence and competency, where competency is linked to a normative requirement/expected educational outcomes, while competence refers to ability, understood more as a personal characteristic/ quality (Berkovska 2014; Milkova 2015), a state of successfully achieving one or more competencies (Velikova 2022).

Along with the above, there is no uniform classification of competencies, i.e. they are classified based on different attributes. According to the type of manifestation, a distinction is made between specific/narrowly professional competencies necessary for carrying out a particular job or profession and those that are transferable, broadly applicable in different life and professional contexts (Velikova 2022). The EU Council and the European Parliament’s Key Competences Framework for Lifelong Learning1) outline eight groups of competencies, as well as a set of transferable, ‘soft’ skills that provide connectivity between each person’s personal, social and professional expression. In turn, soft skills are defined as life skills, 21st century skills, key competencies for a successful life, and lifelong learning (Alt, Naamati-Schneider, & Weishut 2023, p. 1901). Many soft skills are considered essential and mandatory for fields such as social care and education, among other professions (Alt, Naamati-Schneider, Weishut 2023). In addition, apart from the variety of definitions and classifications of competences and competencies, there is no single recommended way to form and assess them in the learning process (McIntyre-Hite 2016).

Both advantages and challenges of introducing a competency-based approach to higher learning are shared (Mulder et al. 2008; Koenen, Dochy, & Berghmans 2015; Simonds, Behrens, Holzbauer 2017). Its implementation requires a major reorganization of the traditional educational paradigm, a reorientation of the focus from teaching to learning related to a change in roles, the development of curricular content aimed at competence formation, the application of a variety of learning technologies, and a change in assessment methods, among others. Taking up this task implies a thorough and systematic study of how competency-based curricula are designed, taught, assessed, and learned. It also requires identifying and understanding the components of the competencies to be formed and the ways in which their development can be fostered (Curry, Docherty 2017).

Research shows that each higher education institution takes an individual approach to introducing competency-based curricula (McIntyre-Hite 2016), and does so at its own pace and according to its own beliefs (Koenen, Dochy, & Berghmans 2015). There are proposals for linking CBE to a reflective approach, through which learners are given the opportunity to reflect on and interpret competence profiles through the prism of their own experiences, knowledge, understandings, attitudes, and expectations (Velikova 2022, p. 41). It has been argued that in this way, CBE aligns with the constructivist paradigm where “competence frameworks of reference... serve as stimuli for self-reflection and orient learners to the specifics of the relevant subject expertise or professional competence”, and this, in turn, enables them to “make conscious, purposeful and informed choices about what, how and when to learn” (Velikova 2022, p. 41). This approach, combined with our view of students as partners and their empowerment through participatory action, is also at the core of our understanding of how it is appropriate to develop competency-based learning specifically in the field of social pedagogy as a humanitarian discipline. This in turn corresponds with the formation of central competencies for the profession of social pedagogue, namely empowerment and collaboration2.

The problem of competencies in the field of Social Pedagogy education and training

A survey of the literature on the topic reveals a variety of competencies identified as essential for the effective performance of social pedagogues in different professional roles and positions. The competence profile of the social pedagogue/ educator developed by the International Association of Social Educators identifies fundamental/central (holistic approach, empowerment, and collaboration), personal and relational, social and communicative, organisational and developmental, and learning competencies (Competence profile 2022). These competencies must be developed both during studies and through continuing and further education2. The education programme should ensure that the knowledge base reflects the professional competencies of social pedagogues2.

It appears that universities and professional schools that train social educators (either independently or in the form of combined social pedagogy and social work programs) have developed their own academic frameworks for competency-based training in the field. There is no uniformity in the formulations, and the definition of competencies varies widely. In Switzerland, for example, the Framework Curriculum focuses on seven competence areas: for planning and implementing social pedagogical work, for supporting everyday life and crisis situations, for professional identity formation, for analysis and documentation processes, for teamwork, for professional reflection and development, and participation in the development of the organisation/institution3. The Austrian framework curriculum for the College of Social Pedagogy describes in twenty points the competencies that graduates acquire, but without associating them with a specific classification4. German vocational schools of social pedagogy are based on the definition of competencies adopted in the German Qualifications Framework and their classification into professional (including knowledge and skills) and personal (divided into social and independence)5.

Specifically, the framework curriculum for training and education in the vocational schools of social pedagogy - Berlin-Brandenburg is competence-oriented and describes the extended professional competence to be developed as a unity of knowledge and skills to be acquired in an action-oriented and developmental learning process concerning reflected practical professional experience. Competent social-pedagogical action in areas of work requires not only specialised skills but also distinct personal skills (social skills, autonomy). The development of a professional attitude is a key goal in the training process, since quality professional relationships and educational work in the various fields can only be achieved through the further development of students’ independence and social skills as part of the training programme. In particular, the acquisition of communicative competencies, which are essential for designing a resource-oriented pedagogical interaction with the child, adolescent, or young adult5.

Pohlman & Gosch (2008) from the University of Applied Sciences in Munich investigated competencies concerning social work education in the joint degree programme in social pedagogy and social work. The authors draw on Roth’s (1971) taxonomy, according to which competencies are divided into personal (autonomy, morality, ego strength, independence, responsibility), professional (language skills, thinking, judgment, and action skills, factual knowledge), and social (conflict management, cooperation, and communication skills). They also note current and frequently cited taxonomies that subdivide competencies into personal, technical-methodological, social-communicative, and activity- and implementation-oriented. For Pohlman & Gosch (2008), the differentiation of competencies in the training in the unified specialisation “Social Work” (Soziale Arbait) is into social, professional, and methodological competencies, some of which could have been already developed before the studies (e.g. social), while professional competences are mostly developed during the studies and are related to the study of basic theories of social work, scientific fields such as sociology, pedagogy, psychology, legal knowledge. They encompass a deep knowledge of target groups, fields of action, and organisational structures of social work. Immediately related to the latter are methodological competencies, which are also formed during studies and refer to a general knowledge of scientific standards and scientific methods, including research. Methodological competencies include social management, social planning, counselling, working with individuals and groups, etc. (Pohlman & Gosch 2008, pp. 9 – 11).

Herbert Effinger’s study of the opinions of social work and social pedagogy graduates between 1995 and 2003 included a study of the acquisition of competencies in three periods: before studies, during studies, and in professional activity (Effinger 2005). Among the most important competencies are highlighted: listening skills, empathy for others (empathy), collaboration with others (teamwork), reflection on self and work (reflection skills), conflict management (conflict resolution), knowing where and how to mobilize resources, ability to adapt quickly to new situations, ability to tolerate controversy, ability to make decisions (decisiveness), critical thinking, ability to distance oneself, good knowledge of legal issues, having and using a sense of humour, having very specialised knowledge (Effinger 2005). According to the results, the prevailing view is that study is key to acquiring reflection on one’s own work, knowledge of the resources to mobilize, knowledge of legal aspects, and very specialized knowledge. Empathy, the ability to listen, the ability to work in a team, reflection on work, and resilience in conflict were rated highest (Effinger 2005).

A similar study by Kollek & Mantey (2005) among 143 graduates of the Specialized Higher School in Berlin presents a correlation between the knowledge and skills provided in the studies and their relevance in the professional career. According to the results, leading in the profession but underrepresented in studies are ability to work independently, communication skills, resilience in conflicts, ability to work in teams, practical experience, social work methods, ICT knowledge, self-assessment, etc. (Kollek & Mantey 2005, p. 65).

Our study among students of Social Pedagogy and professionals in social services in the community, conducted in 2021, showed that the most important competencies for a specialist working in the field of social work are a set of professional qualities and skills, personal qualities, theoretical knowledge, knowledge of the legal and regulatory framework and methodological knowledge (Staneva, Minchev 2022). The recommendations of the study include increasing the relative share and quality of practical training of students and improving the so-called soft skills (communication, teamwork, leadership, time management, responsibility, etc.) that can be implemented at the university level (Staneva, Minchev 2022, p. 648).

Methodology of the study

Considering the variety of differently defined competencies for social pedagogical practice, along with those highlighted as essential for their development in the process of academic training and against the background of the need to engage students as active subjects and partners in the process of competency-oriented learning, our team set out to explore the views of students of Social Pedagogy in relation to the competences necessary for their future realization given the requirements of the profession and which should be developed during the training. For all the conventionality and insufficiency of any single definition, competence is understood here as a personal ability, a complex of knowledge, skills, and attitudes acquired in the process of learning and practical experience.

Instruments

The tools for collecting and analysing empirical information are a questionnaire survey and a focus group. The questionnaire was developed by the research team of the project and consists of 21 questions grouped into three areas as follows: 1) competencies most necessary in the work of the social pedagogue; 2) ways to develop competencies in the context of university education, including teachers’ and students’ roles and functions, and organization, forms, and amount of practical training; demographics by gender, age group, year and form of study, and practical experience.

The first group/ area of questions includes two open-ended questions, as follows: 1. Can you please indicate those professional competencies that you think will be necessary in view of your future successful realization as social educators? and 2. Which of the above competencies do you think need to be improved in your university studies. The purpose of the selection and formulation is for students to indicate the competencies they consider central to the profession and themselves and therefore important to develop during their studies. The same group should answer a closed-ended multiple-choice question, namely: 3. What efforts do you make to acquire these competencies.

The second group/area includes closed questions, where students can indicate more than one relevant answer, and have the opportunity to express another opinion/ add to the answer. For the purposes of this article, only the responses to the first group of questions were analysed.

As a technique to deepen the inquiry, the focus group focuses on the competencies that students indicate as the most important to be stressed on in their university preparation.

The processing of the survey data was done through frequency and quantitative analysis as well as content analysis of the open-ended responses. Content analysis was used to process and analyze the data from the focus group discussions.

Organisation and ethical aspects

The survey was conducted between May and July 2023. In order to reach a wider audience, the survey was distributed both in printed and online format (Google form). Participants were recruited through different communication channels: personal contact with the group leaders, messages on the e-mail lists of the individual courses, and verbal information from members of the research team. The main criterion for inclusion in the study was that the students are enrolled in the two forms of study in the Social Pedagogy major at the Faculty of Educational Studies and the Arts of Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski. 114 students meeting the criterion were contacted.

A total of 20 full-time students, including first to fourth-year students, participate in three focus groups. The selection of participants in the focus groups was made based on willingness to participate, motivation, and activity during the learning process, linked to higher academic performance, and physical presence during the session. The study was conducted face-to-face with the focus groups and was facilitated by members of the project research team. Recordings of group discussions were made with tape recorders, whose transcripts were subsequently provided.

The study complied with the ethical standards for this type of research, confirmed by the Ethics Committee of Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”. Students participating in the focus groups were informed in advance about the duration and rules of the focus groups, the principles of voluntariness, confidentiality, and anonymity of the collected data, as well as their right to withdraw at any time. An informed consent form was provided.

Results

Of the 114 students who completed the questionnaire, 88 were in full-time study, 22 in part-time study and 4 did not provide an answer. Two of the respondents were male, 108 were female and 4 did not provide an answer. Over 90% of the participants were aged between 20 – 25 years, 9 were over 35, 5 did not indicate their age. Results were not analyzed by demographic indicators due to the relative homogeneity of the respondent group.

For the first group of open questions, the data obtained could be interpreted in the direction of the differentiation of personal and professional competencies. Within the group of professional, four subgroups were distinguished, respectively, for communication, empathy, work with a client, and scientific-theoretical. There was some conventionality in the grouping, as individual skills may be recognised in one or another of these groups. For example, being empathetic (as a quality and skill) could be associated with both personal and communication competencies and professional competencies, but was separated in its own due to the frequency of responses identifying its importance in respondents’ understanding (over 39% of responses). Communication (33% of responses) could also be classified as both a professional and personal competence, but we considered it as a separate competence given the variety of forms, means, situations, roles, and subjects in the working reality. Another contingency arising from the nature of open questions came from the use of words with synonymous meaning in the answers. This also necessitated those certain answers be grouped by similarity, such as “positive attitude” with “benevolence”, “communication” and “communion”, “respect” with “tolerance”, and others be relegated to the “other” column.

Among those mentioned, the so-called “working with a client” (over 67% of the answers) stands out as a fundamental competence for every social pedagogue, which is why a large part of the answers unsurprisingly fell into this group. ‘Working with a client’, however imprecise the wording may seem (as there are still a huge number of professionals working with clients), seems to refer more to individualised intervention (Petrova 2011), which involves a complex set of aspects of professional interaction, namely: managing conflict and problem situations, showing respect, confiding, educating, supporting and motivating. Respondents specifically highlighted the need for competence in counselling (group and individual, of children and families), interview, observation, role play, and art therapy. Answers related to communion stand out with high frequency, among them are communication, observation, interaction, listening, assertiveness, and tactfulness. The group of empathy includes cooperation, empathy, emotional intelligence, and understanding. In some of their answers, the respondents indicated personal qualities and characteristics that they recognized as important for their future work, including confidence, purposefulness, persistence, self-initiative, inquisitiveness, determination, punctuality, calmness, self-control, organization, speech/oratory skills, foreign language proficiency. The frequency and quantitative distribution of the four groups of competencies are given in the table below, in descending order.

Table 1. Frequency and quantitative distribution by groups of competencies

CompetenceFrequency distribu-tionPercentageWorking with a client7767%55%39%33%28%Personal63Empathy45Communication38Theoretical32

The answers to the question about the need for further improvement of certain competencies were similar to the data presented in the tables above. The competencies related to communication and practical work with a client were mentioned with the highest repetition. In working with a client, the need to increase knowledge and skills in applying art therapy, assessment methods, mediation, counselling, educational support methods, and interviewing was highlighted.

Depending on the year of study, additional trends in respondents’ opinions could be identified. Communication, personal and scientific-theoretical competencies were more prominent in the answers of the students from the first and second year of study, while for the students in the third and fourth year, the emphasis was put on working with a client and in particular the application of the methods of counselling, observation, assessment, and evaluation.

Analysis of focus group data

Data from the focus groups were analysed using content analysis, whereby the presence and frequency of use of certain words, concepts, relationships, and interrelationships were analysed in terms of the main category, namely competence. The analysis delineated core competencies characteristic of the professional-personal profile of the social pedagogue, which can be formally categorized as personal, professional, social, and communicative.

Four key concepts emerged that students associated more with personal competencies concerning the professional role of the social pedagogue. Among these, “empathy” and “understanding” were present as expected (2 focus groups).

“Empathy, we talk a lot, but I’m not sure everyone knows what empathy is; not just to say it, but what it is, what it contains...” (Female, third year student)

“Understanding, listening, hearing...” (Female, first year student)

Other key words and phrases along these lines were also “patience” and “non-judgemental attitude” which appeared with great intensity in a focus group.

As for the professional competencies, they were mainly represented by concepts related to methods for “direct social-pedagogical work with vulnerable groups” and “building a trusting relationship with clients”. It is noteworthy that they were represented both quantitatively and qualitatively by the largest number of concepts. Methods of working are discussed extensively in the focus groups, with the most significant focus on “individual and group counselling” and “client interviewing”, which students identify as central to their own learning and preparation for their professional practice:

“We need to have practice in counselling, to feel more confident, to be more open with the client, to behave not so much as professionals but as people.” (Female, third year student)

“Counselling is most challenging, the plan for meetings, the questions to ask... More talking about interview – a real case with an interview.” (Female, fourth year student)

Interviewing and counselling were undoubtedly among those methods of social pedagogical activity that largely determine the nature and specificity of the professional interactions of the social pedagogue. On the other hand, highlighting them is logical insofar as the training in the specialty emphasizes these basic methods through the set disciplines and practices. The ability to build a trusting relationship was highlighted as a competency for working directly with a client. There was also a discussion on the need to know the status of the profession of social pedagogue and institutions for social work, which corresponds to some of the important professional competencies, according to the students’ opinion.

Social and communicative competencies were elicited by students through concepts and phrases about “individual and group work skills”, “team collaboration”, and “self-improvement”. In two of the focus groups, the professioanl’s abilities to manage emotions and team-work were mentioned as important for professional activity. The emphasis on emotional inteligence, which appeared to be a significant challenge for students, was impressive as it was noted in each of the focus groups:

“To learn ... to control my own emotions in the first place. After my first practice, I began controlling my emotions.” (Female, third year student)

“How to manage my emotions worries me, how not to cry in front of the client... Self-control over emotions [is needed].” (Female, second year student)

Worthy to mention is that some of the concepts mentioned above intersect with the principles of social-pedagogical work, such as “confidentiality”, “acceptance”, and “understanding of the other”.

Conclusions and summary

The study focused on those basic competencies that students identified as crucial in terms of the demands of professional practice and that they should develop during their studies. This is important given their involvement in a learning process that implies the role of an active learner taking responsibility for their own learning. Broadly speaking, it is evident that the competencies identified as important by students fall within the range of those highlighted by both the professional association of social educators – AIJIE and the framework curricula of the institutions studied. To a large extent, they are also part of the personal and professional qualities and skills identified in the qualification profile of the Social Pedagogy program at SU “St. Kliment Ohridski”, including responsiveness, empathy, tolerance, assessment and planning skills in casework, conflict management skills, social and communication skills, etc.5

To put it differently, we are talking about personal, professional, social and communicative competences, even if the boundaries between them are largely blurred. However, they all form the personal-professional profile of the social pedagogue or, in other words, are included in the set of comptenecies for social-pedagogical practice. The capacity for empathy, teamwork, conflict management, counselling, etc. have also been identified in other studies referred to in the theoretical framework (Effinger 2005). Empathy is probably the most frequently mentioned “soft skill” needed by helping professionals (Alt, Naamati-Schneider, & Weishut 2023). Cited research in the field of empathy identifies it as a “direct social perception of the other’s experience” of great importance in social work practice and education, thus “it is essential that curriculum developers find ways to teach the content of social empathy to students”(Alt, Naamati-Schneider & Weishut 2023, p. 1904).

Current students from all years participated in the survey, and their responses correlated with their year of study. In this direction, there are differences in the way they grasped terms and concepts determined by the degree of theoretical training and practical experience. This is directly related to the construction of their own notion of competence on which students build their reflection, without it being bound to a preset definition. We regard this as an advantage, insofar as in this way they also set parameters of needs on which to focus in the learning process, regardless of whether these are formulated as competence/competencies. The fact that some of the participants in the study were trained under the constraints of the epidemiological setting associated with Covid-19 must also be taken into account here, and this mostly influenced the opportunities for gaining practical experience in a real environment – deficits that students ‘reported’ through the frequency of occurrence of certain desired competencies.

Overall, the analysis allows us to conclude that students articulate notions that directly correspond to the elements of competency-based learning. The approach to engaging students in identifying competencies important to their self-realization in the profession and to develop during their academic training can help both to empower them in the learning process and to specify the social educator’s competencе profile across the conglomerate of competence and competencies associated with the helping professions in general. This is also important in terms of our own self-reflection as academic staff engaged in the education and professional training of future social pedagogues. The results of the study both orient us to the students’ understandings and needs regarding competencies and ways of their formation and justify our efforts to optimize the process towards competency-based learning.

Acknowledgements and Funding

This study is financed by the European Union-NextGenerationEU, through the National Recovery and Resilience Plan of the Republic of Bulgaria, project SUMMIT BG-RRP-2.004-0008-C01.

NOTES

1. The EU COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT’S KEY COMPETENCES FRAMEWORK FOR LIFELONG LEARNING (https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/improving-quality/key-competences).

2. COMPETENCE PROFILE OF SOCIAL EDUCATORS. International Association of Social Educators. (http://aieji.net/media/1093/competence-profile-2022.pdf)

3. RAHMENLEHRPLAN FÜR BILDUNGSGÄNGE DER HÖHEREN FACHSCHULEN „SOZIALPÄDAGOGIK HF“ (2021) Bern: SAVOIRSOCIAL, SPAS. (https://www.bffbern.ch/files/public/Dokumente/04_hoehere_berufsbildung/rahmenlehrplan/RLP_Sozialp%C3%A4dagogik_HF_2021.pdf).

4. RAHMENLEHRPLAN FÜR UNTERRICHT UND ERZIEHUNG. STAATLICHE FACHSCHULE FÜR SOZIALPÄDAGOGIK. (2016) Berlin: Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Wissenschaft. (https://bildungsserver.berlin-brandenburg. de/fileadmin/bbb/unterricht/rahmenlehrplaene/berufliche_bildung/be/RLP_Sozialpaedagogik-RLP_FS_2016__Berlin.pdf).

5. LEHRPLAN DES KOLLEGS DER BILDUNGANSTALT FÜR SOZIALPÄDAGOGIK (2017) BundeskanzleramtÖsterreich. (https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/eli/bgbl/ ii/2017/239/ANL3/NOR40234957)

6. SOFIA UNIVERSITY ‘’ST. KLIMENT OFRIDSKI’’, Faculty of Educational Studies and the Arts, Social Pedagogy (https://fnoi.uni-sofia.bg/?page_id=1534).

REFERENCES

ALT, D.; NAAMATI-SCHNEIDER, L. & WEISHUT, D. J., 2023. Competency-based learning and formative assessment feedback as precursors of college students’ soft skills acquisition. Studies in Higher Education, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 901 – 1917. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2217203.

BERKOVSKA, L., 2014. The competency-based approach to literature education in secondary school. Author’s thesis for the degree of Doctor of Education [in Bulgarian].

BRAUER, S., 2021. Towards competence-oriented higher education: a systematic literature review of the different perspectives on successful exit profiles. Education + Training, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 1376 – 1390.

CURRY, L. & DOCHERTY, M., 2017. Implementing competency-based education. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, vol. 10, pp. 61 – 73. DOI:10.22329/celt.v10i0.4716

EFFINGER, H., 2005. Wissen was man tut und tun was man weiß – zur Entwicklung von Handlungskompetenzen im Studium der Sozialen Arbeit. Blätter der Wohlfahrtspflege, no. 6, pp. 223 – 228. ISSN online: 2942-3147, ISSN print: 0340-8574.

ELATIA, S. & IPPERCIEL, D., 2015. Towards a 21st century competency-based model of higher education: The pragmatics of accountability. International E-Journal of Advances in Education, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5 – 12.

GERVAIS, J., 2016. The operational definition of competency‐based education. The Journal of Competency‐Based Education, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 98 – 106. DOI: 10.1002/cbe2.1011.

KOENEN, A. K.; DOCHY, F. & BERGHMANS, I., 2015. A phenomenographic analysis of the implementation of competence-based education in higher education. Teaching and teacher education, vol. 50, pp. 1 – 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.04.001.

KOLLEK, L.; MANTEY, C., 2005. Wie gut bereitet das Studium auf den Beruf vor? Eine Befragung von ehemaligen Studierenden der Sozialen Arbeit. Soziale Arbeit, vol. 2, pp. 63 – 68.

LOHSE, M., 2023. “Students as Partners” im Studium Soziale Arbeit. Ein hybrids Lehrveranstaltungskonzept zum Ausloten der Potentiale (und Grenzen) forscheden Lernens. Perspekiven auf Lehre. Journal for Higher Education and Academic Development, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 60 – 69. DOI: 10.55310/jfhead.38.

MCINTYRE‐HITE, L., 2016. A Delphi study of effective practices for developing competency‐based learning models in higher education. The Journal of Competency‐Based Education, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 157 – 166. DOI: 10.1002/cbe2.1029.

MILKOVA, R., 2015. Competence and competences of the individual - strategy of university education in the 21st century. Strategies of educational and scientific policy, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 38 – 64 [in Bulgarian].

MULDER, M.; GULIKERS, J.; BIEMANS, H., & WESSELINK, R., 2009. The new competence concept in higher education: error or enrichment? Journal of European industrial training, vol. 33, no. 8/9, pp. 755 – 770.

PETROVA, N. 2011. Training of social pedagogues – competences, standards, perspectives. Pedagogy, vol. XXI, no 1, pp. 39 – 48 [in Bulgarian].

POHLMAN, S.; GOSCH, A. 2008. Kernkompetenzen in der Sozialen Arbeit. Social Challenges in Social Sciences, no. 4. ISSN 1866-153X.

SIMONDS, J.; BEHRENS, E. & HOLZBAUER, J., 2017. Competency-Based Education in a Traditional Higher Education Setting: A Case Study of an Introduction to Psychology Course. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 412 – 428.

STANEVA, Y.; MINCHEV, P., 2022. Professional competences in the sociao-pedagogical field from the specialist perspective. Еducation and arts: traditions and perspectives, pp. 637 – 648. ISSN 2738-8999 [in Bulgarian].

VELIKOVA, S., 2022. Competence-based instruction of (de)humanization of education. Pedagogicheski almanah, pp. 36 – 44. DOI: 10.54664/MBIB1268 [in Bulgarian].

ZOU, T. X.; KOCHHAR-LINDGREN, G.; HOANG, A. P.; LAM, K.; BARRY, T. J. & LEUNG, L. Y., 2023. Facilitating students as partners: co-researching with undergraduates in Asian university contexts. Educational Review, pp. 1– 19.

2025 година
Книжка 9s
Книжка 9
DEVELOPMENT OF DEMOCRATIC CULTURE THROUGH CONTENTS ABOUT THE ROMA IN CLASSROOM TEACHING – STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION

Aleksandra Trbojević, Biljana Jeremić, Hadži Živorad Milenović, Bojan Lazić

Книжка 8
КАТЕГОРИАЛНИ ИЗМЕРЕНИЯ НА ИНФОРМАЦИОННО-КОМУНИКАЦИОННИТЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ СЪС СОП

д.п.н Мира Цветкова-Арсова, Данка Щерева, Славина Лозанова, Маргарита Томова

Книжка 7
ВРЪЗКА НА СОЦИАЛНО-ЕМОЦИОНАЛНОТО С КОГНИТИВНОТО РАЗВИТИЕ В ПРИОБЩАВАЩА СРЕДА

Милен Замфиров, Маргарита Бакрачева, Емилия Евгениева

Книжка 6
КОГНИТИВНО РАЗВИТИЕ НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ, ОБХВАНАТИ В ПРИОБЩАВАЩОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Милен Замфиров, Емилия Евгениева, Маргарита Бакрачева

Книжка 5
COMPETENCE FOR SOCIAL PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICE: WHAT DO STUDENTS TELL US?

Maya Tcholakova, Marina Pironkova, Aleksandar Ranev, Yana Staneva

MULTIMODAL COMMUNICATION IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION CLASSES

Cristiana Lucretia Pop, Cristina Filip

Книжка 4s
GAMES IN FUNCTION OF DEVELOPMENT OF MULTIPLICATION SKILLS

Dasare Sylejmani, Vesna Makashevska, Jasmina Jovanovska

Книжка 4
ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА СИСТЕМИТЕ ЗА УПРАВЛЕНИЕ НА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО В КОНТЕКСТА НА ИНТЕРАКТИВНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Силвия Парушева, Борис Банков, Гергана Касабова, Петя Страшимирова

MILITARY AND SOCIAL THREATS AS DETERMINANTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONTEMPORARY UKRAINIAN HIGHER EDUCATION

Mykola Pantiuk, Tetiana Pantiuk, Nataliia Bakhmat, Olena Nevmerzhytska, Svitlana Ivakh

STEM ОБУЧЕНИЕ НА СТУДЕНТИ ПЕДАГОЗИ В ТРАНСДИСЦИПЛИНАРНА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА СРЕДА

Любен Витанов, Николай Цанев, Людмила Зафирова, Гергана Христова, Катерина Динкова, Калина Георгиева, Жорж Кюшев, Здравка Савчева

ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ И АНАЛИЗ НА НАГЛАСИТЕ НА СТУДЕНТИТЕ ПРИ ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА ГЕНЕРАТИВЕН ИНСТРУМЕНТ НА ИЗКУСТВЕН ИНТЕЛЕКТ

Николай Янев, Иглика Гетова, Теодора Христова, Ива Костадинова, Георги Димитров

Книжка 3
ДРУГИЯТ КАТО ЦЕННОСТ В УЧИЛИЩЕ

Александър Кръстев

Книжка 2
ASSESSMENTS OF TEACHERS AND PARENTS OF CHILDREN WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ON INCLUSION IN PRE-SCHOOL INSTITUTIONS

Zagorka Markov, Hadzi Zivorad Milenovic, Biljana Jeremic, Radmila Zecevic, Milica Pavlovic

Книжка 1s
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА СРЕДСТВАТА ЗА ДОПЪЛВАЩА И АЛТЕРНАТИВНА КОМУНИКАЦИЯ В ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИТЕ ИНСТИТУЦИИ В БЪЛГАРИЯ

. Неда Балканска, . Анна Трошева-Асенова, . Пенка Шапкова, Снежина Михайлова

USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING

Ekaterina Sofronieva, Christina Beleva, Galina Georgieva

Книжка 1
Скъпи читатели, автори, приятели на списание „Педагогика“,

В началото на 2025 година в първия брой на нашето списание „Педагогика“ бих искала от името на редакционната колегия и от мое име да Ви пожелая здраве, творческо вдъхновение и професионално удовлетворение от прино- са Ви към педагогическата наука и практика! Вярвам и се надявам, че списание „Педагоги- ка“ ще продължи да осигурява платформа за научен, обективен и откровен диалог, базиран на резултати от научни изследвания, за насто- ящето и бъдещето на обучението и образова- н

2024 година
Книжка 9s
Книжка 9
ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT OF VIDEO LEARNING RESOURCES IN SMALL-SCALE LEARNING SCENARIOS

César Córcoles, Laia Blasco-Soplon, Germán Cobo Rodríguez, Ana-Elena Guerrero-Roldán

Книжка 8
АНГАЖИРАНОСТ КЪМ УЧЕНЕ ЧРЕЗ ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА СМАРТ ТЕХНОЛОГИИТЕ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Кирилка Тагарева, Дора Левтерова-Гаджалова, Ваня Сивакова

Книжка 7
Книжка 6
Книжка 5s
ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВАТА НА СТАЖАНТСКАТА ПРАКТИКА ПРЕД СТУДЕНТИ – БЪДЕЩИ УЧИТЕЛИ

Илиана Петкова, Марияна Илиева, Владислава Станоева, Георги Чавдаров

Книжка 5
FEATURES OF SPEECH COMPREHENSION TRAINING OF CHILDREN WITH AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS

Maryna Branytska, Svitlana Myronova, Svitlana Mykhalska

OVERVIEW OF THE STEM EDUCATION IN ISRAEL

Aharon Goldreich, Elena Karashtranova

Книжка 4
НАГЛАСИ НА СТУДЕНТИТЕ КЪМ СМАРТ ТЕХНОЛОГИИТЕ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Дора Левтерова-Гаджалова, Кирилка Тагарева, Ваня Сивакова

PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT FOR YOUNG RESEARCHERS

Emina Vukašinović, Marija Veselinović, Milan Milikić

РОБОТИТЕ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО – ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА STEAM ИГРА

Мария Желязкова, Михаил Кожухаров, Даниела Кожухарова

Книжка 3s
Книжка 3
ATTITUDES AND EXPERIENCES OF THE PRESCHOOL TEACHERS IN THE APPLICATION OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION

Nataša Branković, Gordana Kozoderović, Biljana Jeremić, Danijela Petrović, Bojan Lazić, Slavica Karanović

ДИГИТАЛНИ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ПОДКРЕПА НА УЧЕНЕТО

Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова, Лъчезар Лазаров

PREPARATION OF FUTURE TEACHERS FOR ORGANISING A HEALTH-PRESERVING INCLUSIVE SPACE IN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

Nadiya Skotna, Tetiana Nadimyanova, Anna Fedorovych, Myroslava Sosiak, Oksana Yatsiv

Книжка 2s
Книжка 2
ОТ РИСУНКА – КЪМ СНИМКА

Камен Теофилов

Книжка 1s
Книжка 1
„ВТОРОТО“ БЪЛГАРСКО УЧИЛИЩЕ. ГЕНЕЗИСЪТ

Пенка Цонева, Бистра Мизова

2023 година
Книжка 9
EXPLORING THE NARRATIVE IDENTITY OF HUNGARIAN TEACHERS IN SLOVAKIA

Patrik Baka, Terézia Stredl, Kinga Horváth, Zsuzsanna Huszár, Melinda Nagy, Péter Tóth, András Németh

Книжка 8
A QUALITY “ONLINE” TEACHER – WHAT DO STUDENTS APPRECIATE AND VALUE IN TEACHERS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING?

Irena Golubović-Ilić, Ivana Ćirković-Miladinović, Nataša Vukićević

SUPPORT FOR THE INCLUSION OF ROMA CHILDREN THROUGH THE PROJECT TEACHING MODEL

Biljana Jeremić, Aleksandra Trbojević, Bojan Lazić, Gordana Kozoderović

TREND ANALYSIS OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCES OF SPORTS TEACHERS AND COACHES

Sergejs Capulis, Valerijs Dombrovskis, Svetlana Guseva, Alona Korniseva

Книжка 7
ЦЕННОСТЕН ПРОФИЛ НА УЧИТЕЛИТЕ В НАЦИОНАЛЕН КОНТЕКСТ

Цветан Давидков, Силвия Цветанска

Книжка 6s
MODELLING OF MARITIME CYBER SECURITY EDUCATION AND TRAINING

Gizem Kayisoglu, Pelin Bolat, Emre Duzenli

INTRODUCING THE USE OF CASE STUDIES METHODOLOGY IN TRAINING FOR SOFT SKILLS IN MARITIME UNIVERSITIES. THE ISOL-MET PROGRAM

Maria Lekakou, Helen Iakovaki, Dimitris Vintzilaios, Markella Gota, Giorgos Georgoulis, Thalia Vintzilaiou

THE ROLE OF MARITIME EDUCATION IN DIGITALIZATION

Kamelia Narleva, Yana Gancheva

Книжка 6
С МИСИЯ ЗА НАЦИОНАЛНА И КУЛТУРНА ИНДИВИДУАЛНОСТ

Надежда Кръстева, Йордан Колев

Книжка 5s
PREFACE

Nikola Vaptsarov Naval Academy is the oldest technical educational institution in Bulgaria. The Naval Academy is one of the symbols of Varna and Bulgaria in the world maritime community. Its history and achievements establish it as the most prestigious center for training of maritime specialists. At present, the Naval Academy trains specialists for the Navy and for the merchant marine in all areas of maritime life. Research and development conducted at the Naval Academy in Varna

A FAIR CONCERN ABOUT ECDIS

Nikolay Sozonov, Dilyan Dimitranov

DATA-DRIVEN LEARNING APPROACH TO MARITIME ENGLISH

Jana Kegalj, Mirjana Borucinsky, Sandra Tominac Coslovich

DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS THROUGH THE “CASE STUDY” TEACHING METHOD IN MARITIME ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING (MELT)

Tamila Mikeladze, Svetlana Rodinadze, Zurab Bezhanovi, Kristine Zarbazoia, Medea Abashidze, Kristine Iakobadze

MAXIMIZING STUDENTS’ LEARNING IN MARITIME ENGLISH ONLINE COURSE

Valentyna Kudryavtseva, Svitlana Barsuk, Olena Frolova

Книжка 5
Книжка 4s
Книжка 4
Книжка 3s
СПИРАЛАТА ОБЩЕСТВО – ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Иванка Шивачева-Пинеда

Книжка 3
ПРОЕКТНО БАЗИРАНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ ЗА СОЦИАЛНО-ЕМОЦИОНАЛНИ И ТЕХНОЛОГИЧНИ УМЕНИЯ ЧРЕЗ ПРОГРАМАТА „УМЕНИЯ ЗА ИНОВАЦИИ“

Галин Цоков, Александър Ангелов, Йоанна Минчева, Рени Димова, Мария Цакова

МЕДИЙНАТА ГРАМОТНОСТ И УЧИТЕЛИТЕ

Светла Цанкова, Стела Ангова, Мария Николова, Иван Вълчанов, Илия Вълков, Георги Минев

Книжка 2
INTONATION AND CHILDREN WITH EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL PROBLEMS

Katerina Zlatkova-Doncheva, Vladislav Marinov

Книжка 1
2022 година
Книжка 9
ТРАНСГРЕСИВНО-СИНЕРГИЧНО КАРИЕРНО РАЗВИТИЕ В „НЕФОРМАЛНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ“ В УНИВЕРСИТЕТА

д.п.н Яна Рашева-Мерджанова, Моника Богданова, Илиана Петкова

Книжка 8
INTEGRATING INTERCULTURAL EDUCATION IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOL CURRICULUM

Bujar Adili, Sonja Petrovska, Gzim Xhambazi

НАГЛАСИ НА БЪДЕЩИТЕ ДЕТСКИ УЧИТЕЛИ КЪМ STEM ПОДХОДА

Наталия Павлова, Михаела Тончева

Книжка 7
НАЦИОНАЛНАТА ИДЕЯ НА ПАИСИЙ ХИЛЕНДАРСКИ

Йордан Колев, Надежда Кръстева

Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ИВАН Д. ШИШМАНОВ – ЕВРОПЕИЗИРАНИЯТ БЪЛГАРИН

Надежда Кръстева, Йордан Колев

THE TECHNOLOGY OF DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNICATIVE CULTURE OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS

Mariia Oliiar, Nataliia Blahun, Halyna Bilavych, Nataliia Bakhmat, Tetyana Pantyuk

Книжка 4
TEACHERS’ATTITUDES BOUT TEACHING AND LEARNING MATHEMATICS

Aleksandra Mihajlović, Emina Kopas-Vukašinović, Vladimir Stanojević

EDUCATION 4.0 – THE CHANGE OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE LABOUR MARKET

Gergana Dimitrova, Blaga Madzhurova, Stefan Raychev, Dobrinka Stoyanova

Книжка 3s
DISTANCE LEARNING IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMICS

Baktybek Keldibekov, Shailoobek Karagulov

DIGITAL UNIVERSITIES: FEATURES AND KEY CHARACTERISTICS

Marina Skiba, Maktagali Bektemessov, Alma Turganbayeva

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
TWO-TIER MODEL OF TRAINING FUTURE TEACHERS FOR COACHING AT OUT-OF-SCHOOL INSTITUTIONS

Borys Savchuk, Tetyana Pantyuk, Natalia Sultanova, Halyna Bilavych, Mykola Pantyuk

Книжка 1
2021 година
Книжка 9
ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЕТО МЕЖДУ ФОРМАЛНОТО И НЕФОРМАЛНОТО ЗДРАВНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Доц. д-р Вержиния Боянова Гл. ас. д-р Константин Теодосиев Гл. ас. д-р Берджухи Йорданова

FORMATION OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE OF ASSISTANT TEACHER OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN SECONDARY EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

Prof. Dr. Vladyslava Liubarets, Prof. Dr. Nataliia Bakhmat, Prof. Dr. Olena Matviienko, Oksana Tsykhmeistruk, Inna Feltsan

Книжка 8
ОТНОСНО ЗАДЪЛЖИТЕЛНОСТТА НА ПРЕДУЧИЛИЩНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ – РЕЗУЛТАТИ ОТ ЕДНО ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ

Проф. д-р Маргарита Колева, доц. д-р Блага Джорова, д-р Ева Жечева

INFLUENCE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PEDAGOGICAL FEATURES OF STUDENTS ON THEIR ACTIVITY IN SELF-EDUCATION

Dr. Iryna Sereda, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Svitlana Karskanova, Assoc. Prof.

CENTRALISATION AND DECENTRALISATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HUNGARY AND GERMANY

Carla Liege Rodrigues Pimenta, Prof. Dr. Zolt†n R–nay, Prof. Dr. Andr†s Nmet

ЗА ПРИОБЩАВАНЕТО, ОБУЧЕНИЕТО И РАЗВИТИЕТО НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ С ИНТЕЛЕКТУАЛНИ ЗАТРУДНЕНИЯ

Златкова-Дончева, К. (2021). Приобщаване, обучение и развитие на деца и ученици с интелектуални затруднения. Бургас: Либра СКОРП, ISBN 978-954-471-705-6

Книжка 7s
CONCEPT OF PRESENT PRACTICE IN CHOOSING OF OPTIMAL NUMBER OF TUGS

Rino Bošnjak, Zvonimir Lušić , Filip Bojić, Dario Medić

S-101 CHARTS, DATABASE TABLES FOR S-101 CHARTS, AUTONOMOUS VESSEL

Vladimir Brozović, Danko Kezić, Rino Bošnjak, Filip Bojić

INFLUENCE OF HYDRO-METEOROLOGICAL ELEMENTS ON THE SHIP MANOEUVRING IN THE CITY PORT OF SPLIT

Zvonimir Lušić , Nenad Leder, Danijel Pušić, Rino Bošnjak

MEETING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS – EXPERIENCE FROM THE LARGEST SHIPPING COMPANIES

Katarina Balić , Helena Ukić Boljat, Gorana Jelić Mrčelić, Merica Slišković

OPTIMISING THE REFERENCE POINT WITHIN A JOURNAL BEARING USING LASER ALIGNMENT

Ty Aaron Smith , Guixin Fan , Natalia Nikolova , Kiril Tenekedjiev

REVIEW OF THE CURRENT INCREASE OF NOISE UNIT COST VALUES IN TRANSPORT

Luka Vukić , Ivan Peronja , Mihaela Bukljaš , Alen Jugović

TARGET DETECTION FOR VISUAL COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM

Miro Petković, Danko Kezić, Igor Vujović, Ivan Pavić

NEW RESULTS FOR TEACHING SHIP HANDLING USING FAST TIME SIMULATION

Knud Benedict , MichŽle Schaub , Michael Baldauf , Michael Gluch , Matthias Kirchhoff , Caspar Krüger

POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF ELECTRICALY DRIVEN FERRY, CASE STUDY

Tina Perić, Ladislav Stazić, Karlo Bratić

SITUATIONAL AWARENESS – KEY SAFETY FACTOR FOR THE OFFICER OF THE WATCH

Hrvoje Jaram, Pero Vidan, Srđan Vukša, Ivan Pavić

Книжка 7
INCLUSIVE INTELLIGENCE

Dr. Aleksandar Krastev, Assist. Prof.

EDUCATION OF MORAL CULTURE OF STUDENT YOUTH IN THE CONDITIONS OF POLYCULTURAL SPACE

Dr. Natalia Bondarenko, Assoc. Prof. Yevhen Rozdymakha Dr. Lyudmila Oderiy, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Anatoly Rozdymakha, Assoc. Prof. Dilyana Arsova, PhD student

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN KOSOVO – RESEARCH OF TRAINING PROGRAMS AND TESTS

Bekim Samadraxha, Veton Alihajdari, Besim Mustafa, Ramë Likaj

Книжка 6s
EVALUATION OF CRUISER TRAFFIC VARIABLES IN SEAPORTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA

Maja Račić, Katarina Balić, Mira Pavlinović, Antonija Mišura

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CONTRACTS FOR MARITIME TRANSPORT SERVICES. CHAIN OF CHARTER PARTIES

Svetlana Dimitrakieva, Ognyan Kostadinov, Christiana Atanasova

THE LIGHTSHIP MASS CALCULATION MODEL OF A MERCHANT SHIP BY EMPIRICAL METHODS

Vedran Slapničar , Katarina Zadro , Viktor Ložar , Ivo Ćatipović

ON EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN MARITIME COMMUNICATIONS AND THE GMDSS DURING THE COVID-19

Chavdar Alexandrov, Grozdyu Grozev, Georgi Dimitrov, Avgustin Hristov

AIR POLLUTANT EMISSION MEASUREMENT

Nikola Račić, Branko Lalić, Ivan Komar, Frane Vidović, Ladislav Stazić

ASSESSMENT OF LNG BUNKERING ACCIDENTS

Peter Vidmar, Andrej Androjna

EGR OPERATION INFLUENCE ON THE MARINE ENGINE EFFICIENCY

Delyan Hristov, Ivan Ivanov, Dimitar Popov

THE MEASUREMENT OF EXHAUST GAS EMISSIONS BY TESTO 350 MARITIME – EXHAUST GAS ANALYZER

Bruna Bacalja, Maja Krčum, Tomislav Peša, Marko Zubčić

PROPELLER LOAD MODELLING IN THE CALCULATIONS OF MARINE SHAFTING TORSIONAL VIBRATIONS

Nenad Vulić, Karlo Bratić, Branko Lalić, Ladislav Stazić

MODELING OF THE DEPENDENCE OF CO

Hristo Hristov, Ivailo Bakalov, Bogdan Shopov, Dobromir Yovkov

TECHNICAL DIAGNOSTICS OF MARINE EQUIPMENT WITH PSEUDO-DISCRETE FEATURES

Guixin Fan , Natalia Nikolova , Ty Smith , Kiril Tenekedjiev

CONTRIBUTION TO THE REDUCTION OF THE SHIP’S SWITCHBOARD BY APPLYING SENSOR TECHNOLOGY

Nediljko Kaštelan, Marko Zubčić, Maja Krčum, Miro Petković

THE STAND FOR FIN DRIVES ENERGY TESTING

Andrzej Grządziela , Marcin Kluczyk , Tomislav Batur

INTRODUCTION OF 3D PRINTING INTO MARINE ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION – A CASE STUDY

Ivica Kuzmanić, Igor Vujović, Zlatan Kulenović, Miro Petković

SHIPYARD CRANE MODELING METHODS

Pawel Piskur, Piotr Szymak, Bartosz Larzewski

Книжка 6
TEACHERS' PERSPECTIVE ON THE EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF ONLINE TEACHING

Dr. Julien-Ferencz Kiss, Prof. Dr. Florica Orțan, Dr. Laurențiu Mˆndrea

ПСИХОЛОГО-ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ ПРАВИЛА, МОДЕЛИ НА ДОБРИ ПРАКТИКИ И ПРЕПОРЪКИ ПРИ РАБОТАТА И ОБУЧЕНИЕТО НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ С ПОВЕДЕНЧЕСКИ РАЗСТРОЙСТВА

Тричков, Ив., 2019. Психолого-педагогически правила, модели на добри прак- тики и препоръки при работата и обучението на деца и ученици

Книжка 5
ФИДАНА ДАСКАЛОВА ЗА ПЕДАГОГИКАТА

Маргарита Колева, Йордан Колев

ВОЕННОМОРСКОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ – ЕДИН РАЗЛИЧЕН ПОГЛЕД

Кожухаров, А. (2021). Личните академични документи на българската военна образователна система (1892 – 1946). Варна: ВВМУ, ISBN 978-619-7428-55-1

Книжка 4
Книжка 3
НЕВРОДИДАКТИКА

Наталия Витанова

ЗА АСИСТИРАЩИТЕ И ИНФОРМАЦИОННИТЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Сивакова, В. (2020). Асистиращи и информационни технологии

Книжка 2
ОВЛАДЯВАНЕ НА КЛЮЧОВИ КОМПЕТЕНЦИИ ПРИ ОРИЕНТИРАНЕ В СВЕТА

Стоянова, М. (2019). Овладяване на ключови компетенции при ориентиране в света. София: Авангард принт, ISBN 978-954-337-398-7 374

Книжка 1
BULGARIAN SCHOOL – SHOWCASE OF IDENTITY

Veska Gyuviyska, Nikolay Tsankov

ЗА ИЗБОРА НА УЧЕБЕН КОМПЛЕКТ ПО БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕЗИК И ЛИТЕРАТУРА В НАЧАЛЕН ЕТАП. И ЗА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО

Георгиева, А. (2020). Съвременни проекции на обучението по български език

КОНТРОЛ НА СТРЕСА. ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКИ И УПРАВЛЕНСКИ РАКУРСИ

Стоянов, В. (2020). Управление на стреса в организацията. Психологически и управленски ракурси. 198 cтр., Варна: Стено, ISBN 978-619-241-119-0

2020 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
EDUCATIONAL REASONS FOR EARLY SCHOOL DROP-OUT

Maria Teneva, Zlatka Zhelyazkova

Книжка 7s
TEACHING CHALLENGES IN SPORTS EDUCATION DURING THE PANDEMIC COVID-19

Evelina Savcheva, Galina Domuschieva-Rogleva

THE DIFFERENCES IN STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES ABOUT ONLINE TEACHING DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Aleksić Veljković Aleksandra , Slađana Stanković , Irena Golubović-Ilić , Katarina Herodek

ONLINE EDUCATION DURING PANDEMIC, ACCORDING TO STUDENTS FROM TWO BULGARIAN UNIVERSITIES

Antoaneta Getova¹ , Eleonora Mileva² , Boryana Angelova-Igova²

Книжка 7
ПОДГОТОВКАТА НА ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ КАДРИ ЗА ПРЕДУЧИЛИЩНИТЕ ВЪЗПИТАТЕЛНИ ЗАВЕДЕНИЯ ПРЕЗ ПЕРИОДА 1944 – 1991 ГОДИНА

Въчева, С. (2019). Подготовката на педагогически кадри за предучилищните възпитателни заведения през периода

ПАЗАРНИ МЕХАНИЗМИ В УЧИЛИЩНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ. ТЕОРЕТИКО-ПРИЛОЖНИ ВЪПРОСИ

Първанова, Й. (2020) Пазарни механизми в училищното образование. Теоретико-приложни въпроси. София: Колбис, ISBN 978-619-7284-35-5

Книжка 6
TEACHERS ATTITUDES ABOUT INTEGRATED APPROACH IN TEACHING

Emina Kopas-Vukašinović, Aleksandra Mihajlović, Olivera Cekić-Jovanović

Книжка 5
КОНЦЕПТУАЛНИ МОДЕЛИ ЗА РАЗРАБОТВАНЕ НА ПОЗНАВАТЕЛНИ ОНЛАЙН ИГРИ В ОБЛАСТТА НА КУЛТУРНОТО НАСЛЕДСТВО

Детелин Лучев, Десислава Панева-Мариновa, Радослав Павлов Гита Сенка Лилия Павлова

ТАЛАНТЛИВ ПЕДАГОГ И КУЛТУРЕН ДЕЕЦ

Севда Чобанова, Любен Десев

Книжка 4
A CONTINUUM OF APPROACHES TO SCHOOL INSPECTIONS: CASES FROM EUROPE

Rossitsa Simeonova, Yonka Parvanova Martin Brown, Sarah Gardezi, Joe O’Hara, Gerry McNamara Laura del Castillo Blanco Zacharoula Kechri, Eleni Beniata

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2019 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НА БЪДЕЩЕТО

Наталия Витанова

Книжка 7
МОДЕЛ НА РАБОТА В ИНТЕРКУЛТУРНА СРЕДА

(Научноизследователска саморефлексия)

RISK FACTORS FOR EARLY SCHOOL LEAVING IN BULGARIA

Elena Lavrentsova, Petar Valkov

ПРИНОСИ НА ЕЛКА ПЕТРОВА ЗА БЪЛГАРСКОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

(100 години от рождението на проф. д.п.н. Елка Петрова – 27.10.1919 – 21.12.2012)

НАСОКИ ЗА ПРИОБЩАВАНЕ НА МАРГИНАЛНИ СЕМЕЙНИ ОБЩНОСТИ В ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИТЕ ИНСТИТУЦИИ

Нунев, Й. (2019). Насоки за приобщаване на маргинални семейни общности в образователните институции. Велико Търново: Св. св. Кирил и Методий, ISBN 978-619-208-186-7

Книжка 6
ДИОФАНТОВИ УРАВНЕНИЯ И СИСТЕМИ ДИОФАНТОВИ УРАВНЕНИЯ – ТЕОРЕТИЧНИ АСПЕКТИ И МЕТОДИЧЕСКА ПРОЕКЦИЯ В НАЧАЛНИЯ ЕТАП НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Владимира Ангелова. (2018). Диофантови уравнения и системи диофантови уравнения – теоретични аспекти и методическа проекция в начален етап на образование. Пловдив: Паисий Хилендарски, ISBN 978-619-202-394-2

ЕДНА НОВА КНИГА ЗА ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИТЕ УМЕНИЯ НА УЧИТЕЛИТЕ

Николай Колишев. (2018). Теория на педагогическите умения на учителите. София: Захарий Стоянов, ISBN: 9789540912066

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА ИЗСЛЕДОВАТЕЛСКИЯ ПОДХОД ПРИ ОБУЧЕНИЕ НА СТУДЕНТИ ПЕДАГОЗИ

(върху примера на обучение по академичната дисциплина „Съвременни аспекти на гражданското образование“ на студенти педагози)

LEARNING MATURITY

Alina G“mbuță Daniela-Carmen Berințan Marijana Mikulandra Krzysztof Kij Katja Sivka

Книжка 2
ДЕТЕТО И ПЕДАГОГИКАТА

Рашева-Мерджанова, Ян., Петкова, Ил. & Господинов, Вл. (съст.). (2018). Детето и педагогиката. София: Просвета, ISBN 978-954-01-3806-0

Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ КОЛЕГИ,

Редакционната колегия на списание „Педаго- гика“ ви честити Новата 2019 година! Пожела- ваме ви от сърце тя да бъде щастлива, успешна и благословена! През отминалата юбилейна 2018 г. публику- вахме редица стойностни материали на универ- ситетски преподаватели, учители, разнородни специалисти, работещи в сферата на образова- нието, докторанти. Отбелязани бяха поредица от тематични конференции и юбилейни празни- ци. Получихме и международно признание чрез включването на списанието

УЧЕНИЧЕСКО САМОУПРАВЛЕНИЕ

Желязкова-Тея, Т. & Банчева, М. (2018). Ученическото самоуправление. София: Аз-буки. ISBN: 978-619-7065-20-6

2018 година
Книжка 9
ПРАВАТА НА ДЕТЕТО ПРЕЗ ПОГЛЕДА НА СТУДЕНТИ ПЕДАГОЗИ

Йорданка Николова, Даниела Рачева

Книжка 8
СПОДЕЛЕНО МНЕНИЕ

Николова, М. & Михалева, Б. (2018). С увереност срещу агресията и кон-

Книжка 7
РАДОСТТА ОТ ОБЩУВАНЕТО НА ЧУЖД ЕЗИК В ДЕТСТВОТО

Екатерина Софрониева, Христина Белева

НОВО ТЕОРЕТИКО-ПРАКТИЧЕСКО ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА ДЕТСКОТО ТВОРЧЕСТВО

Енгелс-Критидис, Р. (2018). Децата и творчеството. Юбилеен сборник в чест

ПРОФ. Д-Р ЕЛЕНА РУСИНОВА-БАХУДЕЙЛА

Розалина Енгелс-Критидис

Книжка 6
ПОЗИТИВНА УЧЕБНА СРЕДА

Валентина Шарланова

SENIOR CITIZENS’ EXISTENTIAL NEEDS AND EDUCATION FOR THE MEANING OF LIFE

Joanna Łukasik, Norbert Pikuła, Katarzyna Jagielska

Книжка 5
ПЛАНОМЕРНО ПСИХИЧЕСКО РАЗВИТИЕ

(По случай 115 г. от рождението на П.Я. Галперин)

ПАРАДИГМАТА СЕМИОТИКА – ЕЗИК – ДЕТЕ ПРИ 6 – 7-ГОДИШНИТЕ

Жоржетина Атанасова, Любимка Габрова

ПАРАРОДИТЕЛСКАТА ГРИЖА ВЪВ ФОКУСА НА ЕДИН СОЦИАЛНОПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ АНАЛИЗ

Ковачка, Ю. (2017). Социалнопедагогически проблеми при деца с парародителска грижа. Благоевград: УИ „Неофит Рилски“, 144 стр. ISBN: 9789540001340

Книжка 4
ДЕТСКИ КОНФЕРЕНЦИИ

Боряна Иванова

СТЕРЕОТИПИЗАЦИЯ НА ЕТНИЧЕСКИТЕ ВЗАИМООТНОШЕНИЯ ПРИ СЪВРЕМЕННИТЕ МЛАДИ БЪЛГАРИ

Зорница Ганева. (2017). Стереотипизация на етническите взаимоотношения при съвременните млади българи. София: Елестра. ISBN 978-619-7292-03-9

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
СЪВРЕМЕННИ МЕТАМОРФОЗИ НА ВЗАИМООТНОШЕНИЯТА В ДЕТСКАТА ГРУПА

Веселина Иванова, Виолета Кърцелянска-Станчева

SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES AS SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS

Emilj Sulejmani Shikjerije Sulejmani

ОТНОСНО УСЕТА ЗА БРОЕНЕ

Петър Петров, Мима Трифонова

Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ КОЛЕГИ И ПРИЯТЕЛИ,

Редакционната колегия на сп.„Педагогика“ Ви честити Новата 2018 г. Пожелаваме ви тя да бъде здрава, щедра и благословена! Тази година списанието чества своя юбилей – 90 години от неговото публикуване за първи път през 1928 г. с името „Народна просвета“. От деня на създаване до сега, то отразява актуал- ните проблеми на педагогическата наука и прак- тика и остава верен спътник на хиляди научни работници, учители, докторанти. Вярваме, че силата на творческата ни енергия ще пом

ДОБРИ ПРАКТИКИ „ПАРТНЬОРСТВО РОДИТЕЛИ – УЧИЛИЩЕ“

Мехмед Имамов, Калинка Гайтанинчева

2017 година
Книжка 9
ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКОТО УЧЕНИЕ НА Й. ФР. ХЕРБАРТ – ИСТОРИЯ И СЪВРЕМЕННОСТ

(По повод 240 г. от неговото рождение) Невена Филипова

Книжка 8
ЧЕТЯЩИЯТ СТУДЕНТ, ЧЕТЯЩОТО ДЕТЕ – ЕДНО МАЛКО ПРОЗОРЧЕ, ЕДНА ВЕЛИЧЕСТВЕНА ГЛЕДКА

Мариана Мандева, Боряна Туцева, Габриела Николова, Цветелина Ковачева

Книжка 7
ДИДАКТИЧЕСКИ КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТИ

Нели Митева, Наталия Витанова

Илияна Кунева

Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ИЗСЛЕДОВАТЕЛСКО ОБУЧЕНИЕ В АКАДЕМИЧНА СРЕДА

(Научно-теоретична рефлексия) Румяна Неминска

ПРИНОС В ПСИХОЛОГИЯТА НА ТВОРЧЕСТВОТО

(120 години от рождението на Лев Семьонович Виготски) Любен Десев

ЛЕВ СEМЬОНОВИЧ ВИГОТСКИ – ПСИХОЛОГ И НА ХХI ВЕК

(по случай 120 години от рождението му)

ИСКУССТВО В ЖИЗНИ ЛЮДЕЙ

Гульнар Омарова

НОВА И ПОЛЕЗНА КНИГА

Йонка Първанова

ПРИНОСЕН ТРУД КЪМ МЕТОДИКАТА НА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО ПО БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕЗИК И ЛИТЕРАТУРА В НАЧАЛНОТО УЧИЛИЩЕ

М. Мандева (2017). Методика на обучението по български език и литература – I – IV клас. Начално ограмотяване. В. Търново: УИ „Св. св. Кирил и Методий“, 120 стр.

ЕДНО ФУНДАМЕНТАЛНО ИНТЕГРАЛНО ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА РОЛЯТА НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО ЗА РАЗВИТИЕТО НА НООСФЕРНИЯ ИНТЕЛЕКТ

Марга Георгиева, Сава Гроздев. (2016). Морфодинамиката за развитието на ноосферния интелект. София: Изток-Запад, ISBN 978-619-152-869-1

Книжка 4
Книжка 3
СИСТЕМАТИЧНО ВЪВЕДЕНИЕ В ОБЩАТА И ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКАТА СИНЕРГЕТИКА

Любен Десев (2015). Синергетика. Въведение и речник. 777 термина. София: ИК „Екопрогрес“. 464 с. ISBN 978-954-2970-37-8

Книжка 2
ПРОБЛЕМИ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВИ В РАЗВИТИЕТО НА ХУДОЖЕСТВЕНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ У НАС ПРЕЗ ПОГЛЕДА НА ДЕТСКИЯ И НАЧАЛНИЯ УЧИТЕЛ

Теодора Власева, Даниела Гирджева-Валачева, Мария Калоферова, Найден Младенов, Илияна Шотлекова

ЗАКЪСНЯЛО ПРИЗНАНИЕ

Доц. д-р Емилия Николова

Книжка 1
ФАКТОРИ ЗА УСПЕШНО ПРИЛАГАНЕ НА СМЕСЕНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова Лъчезар Лазаров

ЗА СТОПЛЕНИТЕ ПЪТЕКИ КЪМ ЛИТЕРАТУРНОТО ПОЗНАНИЕ

Радев, Радослав. 2015. Технология на методите в обучението по литература. Варна: Славена, 247 с., ISBN 978-619-190-041-1

2016 година
Книжка 9
ИНТЕРАКТИВНИ ТЕХНИКИ ЗА ОВЛАДЯВАНЕ НА ЧЕТЕНЕТО В МУЛТИКУЛТУРНАТА КЛАСНА СТАЯ – ПЪРВИ КЛАС

ФОРМИРАНЕ НА РЕЧЕВА КУЛТУРА, В НАЧАЛНА УЧИЛИЩНА ВЪЗРАСТ, (АНАЛИЗ НА АНКЕТА С УЧИТЕЛИ

Кампания

на Института за български език – БАН, и вестник „Аз-буки“

Книжка 8
Книжка 7
IBM SPSS STATISTICS ПРЕЗ ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИЯ ПОГЛЕД НА ДОЦ. Д-Р ЗОРНИЦА ГАНЕВА

Зорница Ганева (2016). Да преоткрием статистиката с IBM SPSS Statistics. София: Елестра. 712 стр. ISBN 978-619-7292-01-5

НАЧАЛНОТО ОГРАМОТЯВАНЕ – „КЛЮЧ“ ЗА УСПЕШЕН ЖИВОТ В ПРОМЕНЯЩИЯ СЕ СВЯТ

Мариана Мандева, Диляна Гаджева (2016). Начално ограмотяване

ОТ „ЧУДНА И ДИВНА ДАСКАЛЕТИНКА“ ДО ПЕДАГОГИКА ЗА НАЦИОНАЛНО СЛУЧВАНЕ

Виолета Атанасова (2015) Петко Славейков за образованието. Шумен: Унивeрситетско издателство „Епископ Константин Преславски. 208 с. ISBN 978-619-201-051-5

Книжка 6
УЧИЛИЩЕ ЗА ЧЕТЕНЕ

Петя Георгиева

Кампания

на Института за български език – БАН, и в. „Аз Буки“

ДОШЛА ЛИ Е ИНСПЕКТОРЪТ?

Ванина Сумрова

ЩЕ ТЕ ЧАКАМ В/НА ЦЕНТЪРА

Илияна Гаравалова

ПРАВО В ДЕСЕТКАТА

Ивелина Стоянова

ПРОФ.Д.П.Н. СТОЯНКА ЖЕКОВА

Редколегия на сп. „Педагогика“

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
СИНЕРГЕТИКА – НОВО НАУЧНО ПОЗНАНИЕ

(Синергетика – въведение и речник, София: ИК Екопрогрес, 2015 г.)

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
НОВА ДИНАМИЧНА МОДИФИКАЦИЯ В ГРАНИЦИТЕ НА „АЗ-КОНЦЕПЦИЯТА“ НА МАТЕМАТИЧЕСКОТО МОДЕЛИРАНЕ

Марга Георгиева & Сава Гроздев. (2015). Морфодинамиката за развитието на ноосферния интелект, София: Марга Георгиева. 323 стр. ISBN 9786199052204

Книжка 1
IN MEMORIAM

На 10.12.2015 г. ни напусна нашият колега и приятел проф. д-р Иван Пет ков Иванов. Той беше уважаван учен и експерт в областта на педагогическите науки – автор на 10 монографии, 8 учебника, 10 учебни помагала, 6 студии и над 100 статии в специализирани периодич- ни издания и научни сборници; участник в 28 между- народни и национални проекта; председател и член на експертни групи към НАОА, член на редакционната ко- легия на сп. „Педагогика“. Проф. д-р Иван Иванов беше уважаван и оби

2015 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
РУСЕНСКИЯТ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ

Златоживка Здравкова

Книжка 7
ДИСКУСИЯТА В УРОКА ПО ЛИТЕРАТУРА

Огняна Георгиева-Тенева

Книжка 6
УЧИТЕЛЯТ ПРАВИ УЧИЛИЩЕТО

ЕЗИКОВАТА ГРАМОТНОСТ НА МАЛКИЯ УЧЕНИК – „КЛЮЧ“ ЗА ОТГОВОРЕН И УСПЕШЕН ЖИВОТ В ПРОМЕНЯЩИЯ СЕ СВЯТ

ГОТОВНОСТ ЗА ОГРАМОТЯВАНЕ

Екатерина Чернева

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЕ МЕЖДУ ИСТОРИЯ, АКАДЕМИЗЪМ И РЕАЛНИ ПРАКТИКИ В СОЦИАЛНОПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКАТА ДЕЙНОСТ

Академични полета на социалната педагогика, съставител: проф. д.п.н. Клавдия Сапунджиева, научна редакция: проф. дпн Клавдия Сапунджиева, проф. д-р Нели Бояджиева, гл. ас. д-р Марина Пиронкова,

НОВА КНИГА

Клавдия Сапунджиева

Книжка 2
ПРОБЛЕМИ НА СОЦИАЛНАТА АДАПТАЦИЯ НА ПЪТУВАЩИ УЧЕНИЦИ ОТ МАЛКИ НАСЕЛЕНИ МЕСТА1)

Траян Попкочев, Бонка Гергинова, Тереза Карамангалова

Турнир по канадска борба [Arm Wrestling Competition] / Д. Евтимова,

Д. Евтимова, Е. Павлова, И. Радославова и Б. Иванов

Книжка 1
ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: THEORY AND REALITY

Inna Leonidovna Fedotenko

ОТЗИВ ЗА КНИГАТА „ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЕН ДИЗАЙН (КОНЦЕПТУАЛНИ ОСНОВАНИЯ И ПРАКТИЧЕСКИ РЕШЕНИЯ)“

Димова, Д. (2013). Образователен дизайн (концептуални основания

2014 година
Книжка 9
„СОФИЯ – УЧЕЩ СЕ ГРАД“ – МОБИЛЕН СЕМИНАР В ПОДКРЕПА НА НЕФОРМАЛНОТО УЧЕНЕ И ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ В ОБЩНОСТТА

ПЕТЪР ДЪНОВ (БЕИНСÀ ДУНÒ Е И БЕЛЕЖИТ, ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ МИСЛИТЕЛ-ХУМАНИСТ, (ПО ПОВОД НА 0-ГОДИШНИНАТА ОТ РОЖДЕНИЕТО, И 70 ГОДИНИ ОТ КОНЧИНАТА МУ

НА УЧИЛИЩЕ – С УСМИВКА!

Снежана Якимова

НА УЧИЛИЩЕ – С УСМИВКА!

Снежана Якимова

УЧИТЕЛЯТ – ЕТАЛОН ЗА ФОРМИРАНЕ НА ДЕТСКАТА ЛИЧНОСТ

Катя Коруджийска, Янка Маринкова

Книжка 8
Книжка 7
ЗАЕДНО МОЖЕМ ПОВЕЧЕ

Диана Смиленова

Книжка 6
УСПЕШНИЯТ УЧИТЕЛ – МЕЖДУ ПРОФЕСИОНАЛНАТА НОРМА И СТРАСТТА ДА ПРЕПОДАВАШ

Проф. д-р Ангел Петров е преподавател по методика на обучението по български език в СУ „Св. Климент Охридски“. Ръководител е на най- старата катедра по методика на филологически- те дисциплини в страната – Катедрата по ме-

Книжка 5
ВЪЗГЛЕДИТЕ НА ЖАН-ЖАК РУСО И ЛЮБЕН КАРАВЕЛОВ ЗА ВЪЗПИТАНИЕТО

Посвещава се на 180-ата годишнина от рождението на Любен Каравелов (1834 – 1879) Виолета Атанасова

LE PROJET PÉDAGOGIQUE, SOURCE DE MOTIVATION DANS L’ENSEIGNEMENT ET L’APPRENTISSAGE DU FLE

THE EDUCATIONAL PROJECT, MEANS OF MOTIVATION IN TEACHING AND LEARNING FLE

LA PÉDAGOGIE DU PROJET ET LA MOTIVATION DES ÉLÈVES POUR L’APPRENTISSAGE DU FRANÇAIS

PROJECT PEDAGOGY AND PUPILS’ MOTIVATION IN LEARNING FRENCH

Книжка 4
КАЖДЫЙ ДЛЯ МЕНЯ УЧИТЕЛЬ

Ш.А.Амонашвили

Книжка 3
АНТОАНЕТА ЙОВЧЕВА (1952 – 2014)

След трудна борба с тежката болест ни напусна един добър и мил човек, една светла личност – Анто- анета Йовчева, нашата обичана колежка Тони. Нейните колеги и приятели, многобройните автори и сътрудници на сп. „Начално образование“ и на сп. „Педагогика“ ще запазят завинаги спомена за нейната приветлива усмивка, за нейната отзивчивост и преда- ност към работата, за нейната широка култура и стре- меж към познание, към развитие. Родена на 20 март 1952 г. в София в интелигентно се- мей

Книжка 2
ПОСТМОДЕРНИЗЪМ И ВЪЗПИТАНИЕ

Клавдия Сапунджиева

ДЕТСКИ УНИВЕРСИТЕТИ

Боряна Иванова

ПРОФ. Д-Р ЕЛКА ПЕТРОВА

Има личности, в сиянието на които се оглеж- дат цяла плеада последователи, възпитаници, колеги; има личности, без които животът става по беден, дните по-еднообразни, защото в сър- цето остава празно място. Такава личност е професор, доктор на педа- гогическите науки Елка Петрова – най–големият ерудит в областта на предучилищното възпита - ние, учен с международно значение. Дълги години ще свеждаме глави пред нейна- та обаятелна личност, с искрена признателност ще си спомняме свидните

МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЙ ЦЕНТР ГУМАННОЙ ПЕДАГОГИКИ

Международният център „Хуманна педагогика“ организира XIII педаго- гически четения в периода 20 – 23.03.2014 г. в гр.Тбилиси, Грузия. Форумът се организира със съдействието на грузинското правителство. „Учителят“ е темата, която ще обедини участниците: учители, експерти, родители, универ- ситетски преподаватели, представители на педагогическата общност от мно- го страни, за да се осъществи дискусия за мисията на съвременния учител в съвременния образователен контекст. Ръководството на

Книжка 1
ОСНОВНИ ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКИ НА МОБИЛНОТО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова Лъчезар Лазаров

2013 година
Книжка 9
УЧИТЕЛИ ВЪЗРОЖДЕНЦИ В ТЪРНОВО

Венка Кутева-Цветкова

Книжка 8
ДИМИТЪР ДОНЧЕВ – С ВЪЗХИТА ЗА БЪЛГАРСКИЯ УЧИТЕЛ

100 ГОДИНИ ОТ РОЖДЕНИЕТО НА ДИМИТЪР ЕВСТАТИЕВ ДОНЧЕВ (5.10.1913 – 15.02.1997)

Книжка 7
„СЛЪНЦЕТО“ НА ВЪЗПИТАТЕЛНАТА СИСТЕМА В ТВУ – РАКИТОВО

85 ГОДИНИ ОТ РОЖДЕНИЕТО НА АНГЕЛ УЗУНОВ (1928 – 1999)

ЦЕННОСТИ И ДУХОВНО-НРАВСТВЕНО РАЗВИТИЕ НА МАЛКИЯ УЧЕНИК

Марияна Ешкенази, Гергана Фиданова, Марияна Вишева, Цветанка Годжилова

МАЛКИЯТ УЧЕНИК ЧЕТЕ

Марияна Механджиева Венета Велева

С БАБА И ДЯДО В КЛАС

Цветелин Горанов, Таня Илиева, Цветанка Берова, Нели Иванова, Борка Бончева

РОД РОДА НЕ ХРАНИ, НО ТЕЖКО МУ, КОЙТО ГО НЯМА!

Диляна Вачкова Евелина Димитрова

ДА ПОМОГНЕМ НА ДЕЦАТА ДА ОТВОРЯТ СЪРЦАТА СИ

Иванка Дебелушина Нина Маврикова

ДОБРОТО Е У ВСЕКИ

Мария Наскова

ОТЛИЧЕН ПЕДАГОГ, ПСИХОЛОГ И ПСИХОТЕРАПЕВТ

ДОЦ. СВЕТОСЛАВ СТАМЕНОВ (1939 – 2013)

Книжка 6
ТЕОРЕТИКО-ПРИЛОЖНИ ПРОБЛЕМИ НА КОНСТРУИРАНЕТО НА ТЕСТ ЗА НАЦИОНАЛНО ВЪНШНО ОЦЕНЯВАНЕ ПО „ЧОВЕКЪТ И ОБЩЕСТВОТО“ ЗА 4. КЛАС (2013)

Ваня Петрова, Цонка Каснакова, Мариан Делчев Жана Минчева Радостина Стоянова, Рада Димитрова Мария Темникова

MEDIA IN PRESCHOOL AGE OF CHILD’S LIFE

Sonja Petrovska Jadranka Bocvarova

Книжка 5
ШАЛВА АЛЕКСАНДРОВИЧ АМОНАШВИЛИ – УЧИТЕЛ ОТ БЪДЕЩЕТО

В сложното битие на науката и метамор- фозите на социалната реалност, неотменими и общовалидни остават само най-стойностни- те постижения и безспорни истини, които не само маркират и остойностяват територията на човешко познание, но извисяват самия чо- век, поддържат неговата вяра в доброто, под- хранват чувството му за собствена значимост, укрепват неговия дух. Приемайки извечните послания на класи- ческата философско-педагогическа мъдрост и дълбоко обвързан с педагогическата р

МАНИФЕСТ ГУМАННОЙ ПЕДАГОГИКИ

Преамбула 25 лет тому назад группа учителей новаторов провозгласила манифест „Пе- дагогика сотрудничества“ (Переделкино, 1986 год). В последующие годы были опубликованы отчеты встреч учителей новаторов, в которых рассматри- вались разные аспекты педагогики сотрудничества: „Демократизация лично- сти“ (Цинандали, Телавский район, Грузия, 1987 год), „Методика обновления“ (Москва, 1988 год), „Войдем в новую школу“ (Краснодарский край, 1988 год). Идеи педагогики сотрудничества воодушевленно

ПОРТФОЛИОТО НА УЧЕНИКА КАТО ПРОЦЕС НА САМОПОЗНАНИЕ

Радка Топалска Емилия Вълкова, Албена Атанасова

ДОПИРНИ СВЕТОВЕ

Албена Димитрова Стилияна Гронева

ПРЕДИ ГОДИНА И СЕГА

Веселка Аршинкова

Книжка 4
СВЕЩЕНИК ГЕОРГИ МАРИНОВ ПОЛУГАНОВ – ОСНОВАТЕЛЯТ НА УЧИЛИЩЕТО И ПЪРВИЯТ УЧИТЕЛ В ПОЛИКРАЙЩЕ

Георги Георгиев Трифонка Попниколова Марияна Георгиева–Гроссе

ЕВРОПЕЙСКИ ПРИКАЗКИ

Светла Попова

Книжка 3
ДА ОПАЗИМ ДЕТСКОТО ЗДРАВЕ!

Мая Топалова, Симона Пейчева

КАК ДА ОТГЛЕДАМЕ МАЛЪК ПРИРОДОЛЮБИТЕЛ?

Мадлена Николова Ани Цветкова

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
ИЗКУСТВОТО ЗА ПРЕВЕНЦИЯ НА АГРЕСИВНОТО ПОВЕДЕНИЕ НА ДЕЦАТА

Евгения Миланова Виолета Николова Величка Радева

ПРИЯТЕЛСТВОТО В ЖИВОТА НА ДЕТЕТО

Даниела Димитрова Красимира Василева

ПРЕДАЙ НАТАТЪК

Вилдан Мехмедова

ЗАЕДНО ДА БЪДЕМ ДОБРИ

(ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКА СИТУАЦИЯ В ПОДГОТВИТЕЛНА ГРУПА)

ПРОФ. ДПН EЛКА ПЕТРОВА EДНА НЕЗАЛИЧИМА СЛЕДА В БЪЛГАРСКОТО ПРЕДУЧИЛИЩНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ (1919 – 2012)

Почина проф. дпн Елка Петрова (20.ХІІ.2012 г.) – на- шата любима учителка по изкуството да се живее пъл- ноценно и професионално, създателката на науката за предучилищното възпитание на българските деца, пре- красната жена и велика майка, Неповторима, единствена, съвършена – това е нашата Елка: Примерът за всички нас – хилядите нейни студенти и последователи ! Елка Петрова винаги е първа, винаги е оригинална и авангардна; през 1950–1952 г. поставя началото на Висшия мето

2012 година
Книжка 9
ПЕДАГОГЪТ – РИЦАР НА ДЕТСТВОТО

Януш Корчак бе написал, че животът на великите хора е като легендите: труден, но красив. И се оказва пророчески прав, сякаш е писал за себе си! Наследник на семейство с богата духовна култура и традиции, останал отрано без баща, той не просто се справя с несгодите на сирачеството, но развива у себе си три могъщи извора на живот: любов към свободата и справедливостта, страст към знанието и творчеството, отдаденост на децата и тяхното щастие. Лекарят Корчак лекува децата и душите им. Безплатн

ЯНУШ КОРЧАК – ВЕЛИК ХУМАНИСТ И ПЕДАГОГ

„Със сила и мощ поведох своя живот, който беше привидно неподреден, самотен и чужд. За син избрах идеята да служа на детето и неговото дело. Привидно загубих.“ Бе лекар, писател, мислител. Бе философ, учен, моралист. Издател. Възпи- тател и педагог. Бе герой. Бе скромен. Във всяка от тези области той има изключителни постижения. В течение на по- вече от четиридесет години работи като педагог и писател. Четиридесет години безкористно служене на слабите и беззащитните. Създава съвременна кон

ЕВОЛЮЦИЯ НА ПРАВАТА НА ДЕТЕТО

„Детето има право на сериозно отношение към проблемите му, на справедливото им решаване.“

THE KORCZAK’S RIGHT TO SOCIAL PARTICIPATION OF CHILDREN THE CITIZENSHIP OF CHILDREN

A speech by Marek Michalak, the Ombudsman for Children, given during the seminar„The Polish-Israeli pioneer in the fi eld of human rights, Janusz Korczak (1879–1942) and today’s Convention on Children’s Rights as the part of the international law“, Geneva, the 6 of June 2009

ЗА ДЕТЕТО, ДЕТСТВОТО ИЛИ НАУКА ЗА НЕГО?

В памет на Януш Корчак – по повод 70 г. от неговата смърт и 100 г. от създаването на „Дом за сираци“ във Варшава Албена Чавдарова

Книжка 8
CHANGES IN UNIVERSITY TEACHING – THE ROAD FROM KNOWLEDGE TO COMPETENCIES

Slađana Anđelković Zorica Stanisavljević Petrović

ДОСТОЕН ЖИВОТ, ОТДАДЕН НА ПРОСВЕЩЕНИЕТО… ПРОФ. СТОЙКА ЗДРАВКОВА – ЕДИН СЪВРЕМЕНЕН БУДИТЕЛ НА 70 ГОДИНИ

Неуморна и взискателна! Енергична и всеотдай- на! Работохолик и перфекционист! Това е проф. д-р Стойка Здравкова! Не е за вярване, че в началото на ноември 2012 година навърши 70 години. И не е слу- чайно това, че тази светла дата е непосредствено бли- зо до Деня на будителите. А това, че проф . Здравкова е съвременен български будител, е толкова безспорно и видимо! 70–годишнината ù е един чудесен повод ретрос- пективно да си припомним и проследим най-значи-

Книжка 7
ОЧАКВАНА И ПОЛЕЗНА

Емилия Василева

Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ЦЕННО ПОМАГАЛО ЗА ПСИХОЛОЗИ И ПЕДАГОЗИ (Надежден инструмент за диагностициране смисъла на живота)

Любен Десев Минчев, Борис. Тест на Дж. Крумбъг и Л. Махолик за смисъл в живота. Българска версия. Варна, ВСУ „Черноризец Храбър“,

ГЕОРГИ MАВРОВ ЖИВОТ, ОТДАДЕН НА НАУКАТА И ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Така най-общо, но и най-точно можем да охарак- теризираме дейността на ст. н. с. д-р Георги Петков Мавров. Той ни напусна неочаквано в края на април т.г. И до последния си ден не преставаше да се вълнува от проблемите на образованието. Споделяше инте- ресни мисли относно предстоящото приемане на За- кона за образованието. Пестелив на думи, но щедър на дела – това ясно проличава от неговата богата би- ография.

Книжка 4
ОЩЕ ЕДНА ИДЕЯ

Галина Стоянова

Книжка 3
С ИНОВАТИВЕН ПОГЛЕД КЪМ ЛИЧНОСТТА НА ДЕТЕТО

Маргарита Абрашева Любимка Габрова

БИЗНЕС ОБУЧЕНИЕ В ДЕТСКАТА ГРАДИНА

Красимира Костова Петя Драгоданова

ДЕТСКАТА БЕЗОПАСНОСТ

Любимка Габрова

БАБА ПРИКАЗКИ РАЗКАЗВА... (МИКС ОТ ПРИКАЗКИ)

Кева Захариева, Мария Мичева

Книжка 2
ДЕТЕ ПЪТУВА В АВТОМОБИЛА

Красимира Михайлова

ПРОТИВОПОСТАВЯНЕ

Пюрвя Ердниев, Б. Ердниев

ЗДРАВКА НОВАКОВА – ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛ И ТВОРЕЦ

Седемдесетгодишният юбилей е вълнуващ повод да проследим трудния, богат и съдържателен професионално-творчески път на доц. д-р Здравка Новакова, да под- чертаем нейната важна роля за утвърждаване на дидактика на математиката като

IN MEMORIAM Иван Марев

Напусна ни проф. Иван Марев – философ, педагог, демократ, родолюбец. В далечната 1975 г., зареден с енергия, пълен с идеи, той създаде в Техническия

Книжка 1
ДЕЛЕГИРАНЕ НА ПРАВА ЧРЕЗ КОМИСИИТЕ В ДЕТСКАТА ГРАДИНА

Маргарита Абрашева Политиката, наречена управление на качеството, не е самоцел, нито поредна обра- зователна „мода“. Тя е практически необходима за поддържане от директора на учеб- ното заведение на един привлекателен образ в условията на конкуренция на пазара на учебни заведения. Това се отнася най-вече за детските градини. Политиката на упра- вление на качеството съдържа недостатъчно използван ресурс, включително за спечел- ване и запазване доверието на потребителя – родителите на децата,

ИНОВАЦИОННИ И ИНТЕРАКТИВНИ МЕТОДИ В КВАЛИФИКАЦИОННАТА ДЕЙНОСТ НА ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИЯ КОЛЕКТИВ

Стоилка Ташева, Севда Лукайчева Развиващото се с динамични темпове общество в днешно време налага необ- ходимостта от иновационни промени в областта на образованието. И в предучи- лищната педагогика все по-често се търсят алтернативни педагогически техноло- гии както за възпитанието и обучението на децата, така и при провеждането на квалификационната дейност на самите педагози. Използването на интерактивните методи дава възможност да се възлагат за- дачи, които предполагат съвместна работа,

ТОВА ТРЯБВА ДА ГО ЗНАЕ ВСЯКО ДЕТЕ

Татяна Атанасова, Иванка Пампова

НА УЛИЦАТА Е ОПАСНО

Таня Янчева, Зоя Кацарова