Педагогика

https://doi.org/10.53656/ped2024-9s.03

2024/9s, стр. 35 - 51

LEVERAGING BELBIN ROLE MODEL AND BURTLE TEST FOR ENHANCING BUSINESS EDUCATION THROUGH GAMIFICATION: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY

Sonia Mileva
OrcID: 0000-0002-5636-874X
WoSID: C-8850-2016
E-mail: smileva@feb.uni-sofia.bg
Sofia University
Sofia Bulgaria
Veneta Andonova
OrcID: 0000-0003-0072-0174
E-mail: vandonov@uniandes.edu.co
Universidad de los Andes School of Management
Bogotá Colombia
Aleksey Potebnya
OrcID: 0000-0003-3791-0326
WoSID: A-8196-2019
E-mail: aleksey.potebnia@feb.uni-sofia.bg
Sofia University
Sofia Bulgaria

Резюме: This study explores how gamified learning experiences, combined with team role performance (e.g. Belbin’s team role model) and player motivation profiles (e.g. Bartle test) can enhance feedback skills among students in entrepreneurship education. It examines whether this approach improves students' ability to give and receive feedback, contributing to their overall educational experience. The study involved assigning least preferred team roles and personality assessments while working on entrepreneurial case studies. The findings highlight patterns between gamer profiles and team roles, revealing gaps in feedback training. The study discusses how gamified approaches and tailored learning experiences can strengthen business education. Educators can gain a deeper understanding of the impact of students' profiles on team contribution and individual feedback skills, thereby tailoring educational approaches to better engage and empower future entrepreneurs.

Ключови думи: gamified learning; team role performance; player motivation profiles; education

Introduction

Gamification tools boost student’s engagement and motivation in higher education (Mohd et al. 2023; Buckley & Doyle 2016; Deterding et al. 2011; Gamarra et al. 2021; Alabbasi 2017). By leveraging game-like elements such as simulations, role-playing, challenges, and reward systems, educators can not only increase engagement but also foster teamwork skills and a deeper understanding of business concepts, equipping students with lifelong skills to address the complexities of a rapidly changing work environment.

This paper delves into the intersection of personality assessment and gamification within the context of entrepreneurship education. The modern business bachelor’s degree education, combined with gamification requires a multifaceted approach that goes beyond traditional classroom learning. Gamification, the integration of gamelike elements into non-game contexts (Deterding et al. 2011), offers significant potential to engage students and foster a deeper understanding of concepts and improved academic performance. This paper explores the role of gamification as a driver for enhanced student engagement in business education, taking into consideration the team dynamics and roles played in the context of entrepreneurial education.

While gamification has been shown to increase student engagement, practical understanding (Kapp 2012) and innovation (Andonova et al. 2023), limited research explores its potential when combined with personality and team role assessments. This study addresses this gap by investigating the potential synergy between the Burtle test, which identifies player profiles, and the Belbin’s team role model, which proposes a taxonomy of team roles. Through an exploratory study based on role model dynamics, we examine how these assessments can be leveraged to tailor gamified learning experiences in business education in the context of entrepreneurship, where the skill of feedback giving and receiving is fundamental to success.

The main research question is: How can gamified learning experiences, informed by team role performance (e.g., Belbin’s team role model) and player motivation profiles (e.g., Burtle test, adapted for educational contexts), enhance the development of skills, in particular feedback giving and receiving, among students as a premise for effective business education in the context of entrepreneurship?

Traditional methods in business education may not fully address the development of essential teamwork skills needed for success in entrepreneurial ventures. Gamified learning, with its emphasis on competition, collaboration, and achieving goals in highly unstructured situations, presents a potentially powerful tool for fostering these skills. Additionally, taking on challenging team roles can highlight individual strengths and weaknesses within team dynamics. This is especially important for the success of entrepreneurial projects where 65% of startups fail due to interpersonal conflicts within the founding team (Wasserman 2013). Moreover, player motivation profiles can provide insights into how students are most likely to engage and learn within a gamified environment and on this basis seek implications regarding their behavior in entrepreneurial teams.

From a pedagogical perspective, administering the Belbin’s team role model (adapted to a team of five) and the Burtle test (tailored to gamified learning environments) can provide data for both educators and students. The team formation and role assessments within the gamified environment can ensure a mix of appropriate roles, enhancing the understanding of the division between the self and the role assigned to each team member. The gamification design and elements like clear goals, leaderboards, collaborative problem-solving tasks, and opportunities for open-ended exploration, can be incorporated based on player motivations. Reflection and constructive feedback from the post-game discussions can encourage students to reflect on how their individual strengths, team dynamics, and the gamified environment contributed to their learning experience and build awareness about the separation between the role and self of each player, strengthening a lifelong skill (Dahalan et al. 2024) such as feedback giving and receiving.

We explore the potential for a powerful synergy between the Burtle test, which identifies player profiles in games, and the Belbin’s team role model, which categorizes team roles. Through an exploratory experimental study, we investigate how these assessments can be leveraged to improve entrepreneurship education using gamified learning experiences geared toward the development of feedback giving and receiving.

In this study we employed a role play game to investigate group dynamics and feedback giving and receiving skills within the context of business administration education, in particular, entrepreneurship. While the experiment utilizes a relatively homogenous sample of 24 second-year bachelor's degree students from Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, the chosen theoretical frameworks can still provide generalizable insights despite the limitation of sample size and specific cultural context.

Our research involved administering both the Burtle Test and Belbin Team Role assessment to students, challenged by solving a time-constrained entrepreneurial task that represents a recent dilemma faced by technology-driven European startups. By analyzing the results, we aim to gain a deeper understanding of individual student preferences and strengths regarding team performance and specifically, feedback giving and receiving. Using a somewhat limited sample, the findings reveal patterns between identified gamer profiles and team role preferences and aversions, suggesting potential correlations in how individuals approach challenges in both gaming and teamwork contexts related to entrepreneurial education.

We discuss the importance of team formation and the role of feedback giving and receiving for entrepreneurial success as well as the importance of developing engaging gamified learning experiences. By integrating the Burtle Test and the Belbin Team Role Model, we gain a more nuanced understanding of students' profiles and behaviors to support the acquisition of lifelong skills. The insights can help tailor educational approaches that better engage and empower students of entrepreneurship and business domains.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In the following section we succinctly describe the theoretical foundation and the main characteristics of the Belbin’s team role model (Belbin, 1993) and the Burtle test (Burtle, 1996). Then we present the methodology, Next, the empirical results are described, and we discuss their implications. The final section concludes.

1. Theoretical Framework

Belbin's team role model is a tool for understanding and optimizing team dynamics (Belbin 1993). In organizational contexts, Belbin’s management roles are intended to provide guidance to decision makers about building balanced teams capable of conducting honest review and assessment of team contribution using depersonalized conversations and effective feedback. The model categorizes individuals into nine distinct roles, each with unique strengths and weaknesses within a team environment. Belbin’s managerial roles are defined as follows:

Action-oriented roles

Implementer: The implementer is essential when practical steps need to be planned effectively. She gets things done but might be inflexible or resistant to unproven or experimental ideas.

Completer-finisher: She becomes most visible at the end of a task when she takes the lead for polishing up the results and checks the outcome for possible mistakes. She is a perfectionist but might not like to delegate.

Shaper: The shaper is a person with a drive and courage to overcome obstacles. She formulates the demands and the focus for the team not to deviate from the objective. She is open minding and dynamic but often impatient.

People oriented roles

Coordinator: She supports the team members in taking on tasks according to their strengths. She is confident but might not be creative.

Resource investigator: She spreads the team’s ideas to the outside world and builds valuable support networks. She is a strong communicator but too optimistic.

Teamworker: She helps the team to function harmoniously by reducing friction. She is considerate and willing to work for the benefit of the whole team but is indecisive in critical situations.

Knowledge-oriented roles

Plant: She tends to be very creative and comes up with unconventional solutions and new ideas to problem solving. She might be lost in thought.

Monitor-evaluator: She brings logic to inspect the feasibility of proposals arising within the team. She has strategic vision but is sometimes too dispassionate.

Specialist: She brings specific knowledge and information to the problem solution. The specialist is focused on a specific domain and often gets lost in detail.

Inspired by Belbin’s taxonomy, we developed a simplified team role model geared towards the specific context of entrepreneurship, where startup teams rarely exceed five (Andonova et al. 2019). Moreover, entrepreneurial development relies not so much on specialists but more on generalists who can take upon several related roles. Thus, we simplify the taxonomy of nine roles, categorizing them into the three main areas as originally defined (Belbin 1993), and propose five distinctive roles. These are intended as a more realistic approximation to entrepreneurial team composition and respond to the need for a less complex framework suitable for learning and training purposes. We propose the following five roles (the original Belbin’s roles in brackets):

1. Innovator (Plant and Shaper) who "thinks outside the box," challenging traditional approaches, and generating creative ideas.

2. Coordinator (Coordinator) who prioritize organization, team and time management.

3. Implementer (Implementer and Completer) who turns ideas into action and takes the initiative.

4. Expert eye (Specialist and Monitor) who brings expertise relevant to the team's task.

5. Diplomat (Teamworker and Resource investigator) is in charge of maintaining a harmonious team environment and supporting others.

The Burtle test, developed by Richard Burtle (1996) is a prominent tool in the field of game studies used for understanding player motivations in multiplayer online games (such as massively multiplayer online games, MMO and multi-user domains, MUD). It categorizes players based on their preferred in-game activities and underlying psychological drives. This framework provides insights for game designers who can leverage this knowledge to create more engaging experiences that cater to diverse player types. This framework focuses on player motivations within multiplayer games, identifying the following player types: Achievers (goal-oriented), Explorers (discovery-driven), Socializers (relationship-focused), and Killers (competitiondriven) (Burtle 1996). While primarily used in game design, Burtle’s player types can offer initial insights into student motivations within a gamified learning environment, a topic that has not been systematically explored.

Methodologically, the Burtle test typically employs a series of statements where players choose the option that best reflects their in-game preferences. Based on their responses, players receive a percentage score in each category, indicating their dominant player type. However, it's important to recognize that players often exhibit characteristics from multiple types to varying degrees, forming a spectrum rather than pure distinct categories (Przybylski et al. 2014).

The Burtle's player types categorize individuals based on their tendencies and preferences within a particular environment. In our case, the environment is second years of Business Administration students. The Burtle test, although with its limitations, provides a framework for understanding player motivations in multiplayer games. We conjecture that in combination with a role-play game designed according to an adapted and simplified version of the Belbin’s team roles, more engaging and transformational learning experiences can be designed for improved entrepreneurial training and education. The awareness about team roles and the ability to give and receive depersonalized feedback regarding team contribution represents a lifelong skill with high value application in entrepreneurial and business environments (for a high impact application in entrepreneurial coachability) (Somia et al. 2024).

2. Methodology

This study employed a feedback role play game to explore and train feedback giving and receiving in the context of business administration education and more specifically entrepreneurship. Twenty-four second-year bachelor's degree students from Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski” participated in the experiment, divided into groups of five, according to a negative self-selection process of five roles as per Innovator, Coordinator, Implementer, Expert Eye and Diplomat.

Selecting students from the same year and program offers several advantages. First, it fosters a relatively homogenous group in terms of educational background and potentially similar prior experiences related to feedback giving and taking. This helps control for external variables and strengthens the internal validity of the experiment, thus, the results are more likely to occur due to the intended experimental design, not due to the pre-existing differences among participants. Second, focusing on business administration students aligns well with the game’s focus on group dynamics and feedback giving and receiving skills, crucial for success in this field, specifically in the context of entrepreneurship.

The role play game design draws inspiration from the concept of player models in game-based learning environments. Similar to how player models categorize players based on motivational drives in games (Burtle's model), assigning specific roles within the feedback game aimed to explore how individuals placed into their least preferred team roles learn to receive and give feedback to others who are similarly placed into their least comfortable roles.

In total 24 participants were given a lecture on the importance of team dynamics for business and entrepreneurial success, including a detailed presentation on the simplified Belbin’s team role taxonomy. At the end of the lecture students were asked to report their most and least preferred team roles. Then they were organized into four groups of five (20 students), the four remaining students acting as facilitators to enhance data collection. To ensure balanced group roles, the sole criterion to place a student into a team was to play the game from the declared least preferred team role (Innovator, Coordinator, Implementer, Expert Eye, Diplomat). This approach ensures that each student receives feedback about her performance in a somewhat challenging role play experience and provides feedback to others who play under the same condition. Following prior instructions, including a detailed time management table, the case materials and the feedback templates for each role, each one of the four student facilitators was assigned to a team.

Students received feedback templates in which they wrote the name of all team members and their assigned roles. The five playing students and the facilitator were seated into a close-knitted circle. The facilitator read the text of a short case study (300 words), describing an entrepreneurial challenge faced by a real European startup. A possible action plan was requested as the only outcome of the role play game. A time limit of 10 minutes was enforced by the facilitator. After the end of the ten-minute discussion, the proposed action plan was verbally explained by the Coordinator and written down by the facilitator, who read the epilogue of the case to update the players on the preferred action choice by the startup team featured in the case. Next, dedicated feedback round followed, where each team player had to formulate the strengths and weaknesses of her/his peers in relation to their performance according to the assigned role. The facilitator concluded the feedback round sharing his/her feedback as an outside observer. During this round, participants adhered to predefined guidelines about feedback tailored to each role. A second round of the game was played preserving the assigned roles, initiated by the reading of a new short case study and concluding with a feedback round.

Finally, all participants completed a post-game form. The form addressed the perceived value of the game, a self-evaluation with socio-economic parameters and a quantitative assessment of each player in his/her assigned role, using a 5-point Likert scale. To ensure objectivity, the template also included qualitative evidence to support the reported Likert scale score, emphasizing factual language and specific examples to substantiate the reported strengths or areas for improvement for each player. The template explicitly discouraged personal references and subjective statements such as “Your/Myˮ, “I feelˮ or “I thinkˮ in favor of factual feedback regarding team contribution given the assigned (the least preferred) role of each player.

The data collected from the post-game forms, including the feedback provided by the facilitators is analyzed in the next section.

By incorporating self-evaluation and peer-assessment instruments, the game focused on the experience of feedback giving and receiving. This closing loop aligns with the principles of learner models, which emphasize the importance of targeted feedback to enhance the learning process. The role game integrates elements from both player models and learner models within a game-based learning context. By assigning roles and fostering constructive feedback through a structured template and a feedback process, the game offers an opportunity to evaluate the learning experience for participants in the specific context of business and entrepreneurship education, similar to how game flow optimization enhances both gameplay and learning outcomes in educational games.

Following the completion of the postgame forms, the exploratory study proceeded with the implementation of the Burtle test. This psychometric instrument categorizes players in multiplayer games based on their motivational drives (Achiever, Explorer, Socializer, Killer). Administering the Burtle test allowed to identify participants' dominant player types and explore how these individual motivations might influence their performance and overall experience in the feedback game. By matching player types with assigned (least preferred) team roles, the experiment aimed to investigate potential synergies between player motivations and feedback giving and receiving skills within the game's structure.

The pre-experiment measures include role preference (the most and the least preferred) based on the simplified and adapted Belbin team role model as well as role assignment (the least preferred role). In-game data collection captures aspects of perceived performance of each player within the assigned role. Additionally, the game development was supported by two experimenters as guarantors for the smooth and correct development of the feedback game. The post-game surveys are individual surveys meant to capture participants' perceptions of each players’ performance within the assigned roles, the overall game experience and value as well as socioeconomic data related to the exposure to entrepreneurial behavior.

By collecting data through these methods, we aim to gain a comprehensive understanding of how the assigned Belbin roles, group interactions, and feedback mechanisms influenced feedback giving and receiving within the context of business administration education. In the next section we report the results of the systematic analysis. The analysis techniques employed provide a comprehensive overview of the dataset, highlighting key patterns and relationships. Descriptive statistics and data visualization offer summaries and suggest potential associations within the data.

3. Results

The study employed a group of 24 participants, divided into four groups of five players. Additionally, one facilitator per group was present. Two observers (experimenters) ensured the smooth development of the game. While group formation occurred spontaneously in relation to the least preferred role, the resulting sample achieved a balanced gender distribution with 50% male and 50% female participants. All participants were second-year students. The age range for the sample was primarily between 21 and 25 years old, with three participants falling outside this range at the age of 20. This balanced distribution is beneficial for examining genderrelated differences in motivations and preferred roles. A younger demographic can potentially offer unique perspectives and motivations regarding feedback giving and receiving.

According to the responses to the post-game survey a significant majority of participants (71%) consider the skill of feedback giving and receiving important and 21% rate it as very important. This indicates a generally positive attitude towards the skill of feedback giving and receiving within the group, with a strong recognition (92%) of its importance. Despite this positive attitude, slightly over half of the participants (54%) did not receive training on giving or seeking feedback. This gap highlights an area for potential improvement in their professional development programs. The majority (62.5%) of participants had experience with giving or receiving feedback in real-life situations. This suggests that the exercise could leverage a strong foundation of shared experiences when discussing the practical application of feedback skills.

Over half of the participants reported (14 students) knowing someone who had recently started a business. This suggests that entrepreneurship may be a relatively common pursuit among the social circles of the students. There is a high number of non-responses (41.7%) suggesting that some participants didn't know anyone who had started a business, or that they were uncomfortable answering the question.

Most students found the feedback game applied to an entrepreneurship context highly useful, rating it between 4 and 5 on a five-point Likert scale. They appreciated the opportunity to receive constructive criticism, which was perceived as instrumental in their personal and professional development. Comments such as “The feedback helped me identify areas for improvement and understand my strengths better” are common. A share of students rated the exercise as moderately useful, giving it a 3. These students recognized the benefits of feedback but felt that its impact was limited. For instance, one student noted, “It was useful, but I believe more detailed feedback could have been provided”. A few found the exercise less or not at all useful, rating it 1 or 2. These students felt that the feedback was either too general or not delivered effectively. As one respondent mentioned, “I did not find the feedback very useful as it was too general”.

When considering the usefulness for their peers, most students rated the game high, observing that their classmates also benefited significantly from constructive feedback. However, it was noted that the impact varied, with some peers not taking the feedback seriously. Overall, the feedback game was generally perceived as beneficial, underscoring its importance in enhancing both personal and teammates’ skills. These insights suggest that refining feedback to be more specific and actionable can further improve its effectiveness in educational settings.

The Burtle test provides an alternative lens to evaluate participants’ game experience, categorizing them as players in a gamified environment. This perspective can help calibrate the feedback results regarding skill development according to the player's motivation. Participants identified as “Achievers” and “Explorers” in the Burtle test, for example, may exhibit a natural inclination towards seeking and providing feedback due to their goal-oriented and discovery-driven motivations. This can correlate with the positive attitudes towards feedback, reinforcing the importance of feedback across different environments.

Arguably, the Burtle test can also reveal discrepancies in feedback training and experience. For instance, participants who identify as “Socializers” might place a higher value on communication and feedback in both real-life and gamified contexts. By examining these cross-environmental responses, educators can better understand the nuances in feedback perceptions and identify specific training needs.

The feedback game influenced the reported personal growth of students. According to the post-game survey, it not only helped students recognize their strengths but also made them more aware of their weaknesses. For example, one student noted, “The feedback game highlighted my ability to lead and organize tasks efficiently, which I hadn't fully appreciated before”. This recognition of strengths is essential for personal growth, as it empowers students to leverage their abilities in future projects and careers. Moreover, the game had a significant impact on students' attitudes towards feedback. Many reported becoming more open to seeking and giving feedback, understanding its value for personal and professional development. As one student shared, “The game made me realize the value of feedback, and now I'm more inclined to seek it out and provide it constructively”.

Students also reflected on how feedback had helped them improve skills or behaviors. For instance, feedback on presentation skills led one student to work on their public speaking, resulting in significant improvement in subsequent presentations. Another student mentioned, "The feedback pointed out my tendency to overlook details, which made me more conscious of this habit and motivated me to work on it.” Such awareness is critical for fostering a growth mindset and encouraging continuous improvement.

Many students reported positive changes in their understanding and approach to teamwork as a result of the feedback game. For example, a student noted, “I've become more open to others' ideas and more proactive in offering constructive feedback, which improved our team dynamics during the case discussion”.

Finally, students expressed intentions to incorporate the lessons learned from the feedback game into their future projects and careers. They emphasized the importance of continuous improvement and effective communication. One student articulated, “I plan to regularly seek feedback in my future projects to continuously improve and ensure I'm meeting the expectations of my team and clients”.

Therefore, the feedback game was well received and appreciated by students. It helped them recognize their strengths, become more aware of their weaknesses, and make positive changes in their approach to teamwork and feedback giving and receiving. These findings underscore the value of incorporating regular training on feedback giving and receiving in educational curricula to foster personal and professional growth, preparing students for the complexities of the real world. Gamification appears to be particularly suitable to this end.

In this regard, a second game-related instrument, the Burtle test was applied to uncover players' motivations.

Table 1. Cross-table between the Belbin’s role models
and Burtle’s dominant player types of 20 students

DiplomatExpertImplementatorCoordinatorInnovatorGroup 1ExplorerSocialiserKillerSocialiserExplorerGroup 2SocialiserKillerExplorerKillerKillerGroup 3ExplorerExplorerKillerKillerSocialiserGroup 4KillerExplorerKillerKillerKiller

Source: Own elaboration.

Figure 1. Belbin’s team roles and Burtle’s player types

Source: Own elaboration.

An analysis of Burtle type distribution among second-year Business Administration students revealed that the “Killer” type is the most prevalent, with 10 out of 24 students identifying as such (see Table 1). This represents a significant portion of the sample, indicating a highly competitive motivation among the students. The other Burtle types – “Socializer”, “Explorer”, and “Achiever” – are significantly less frequent. The presence of unspecified types – players with at least two almost equally strong dominant profiles – also adds to the diversity of player motivations within the group.

The dominance of the “Killer” type is an unexpected outcome that merits further investigation. This type is characterized by a competitive drive and a focus on winning, which can significantly impact team dynamics and learning outcomes. The presence of “Explorer” and “Socializer” types, accounting for 30% and 20% of participants respectively, indicates a varied range of motivations that can contribute to a well-rounded learning environment. Interestingly, the “Achiever” type was not frequent, contrary to expectations that in an educational setting focused on goal attainment and performance such motivations are prevalent.

As reported in Table 1, students whose least preferred team roles (to which they were assigned) were Coordinators and Implementers, frequently identified themselves as “Killers” This finding suggests a possible correlation between discomfort with adopting the roles of Coordinators and Implementers and a competitive mindset, which could be also influenced by the demographic profile of the sample. Given that most participants are in the 21 to 25 age range, their developmental stage and external influences might also play a role in showing weaker preferences to coordination and implementation as team functions.

Diplomats and Innovators are equally uncomfortable team roles for all types of player profiles both when we consider the dominant player tendency shown in Table 1 or the dominant and the complementary ones, as shown in Figure 1. Diplomats emphasize relationships and maintaining harmony whereas Innovators focus on creativity and discovery. Weaker student preferences for taking on the role of Innovators and Diplomats might be a warning signal for educators to strive to provide more comfort with innovation and experimentation in educational programs. This might also indicate a need to enhance the focus on team balance and cooperation rather than on promoting competitive dynamics, which seem to be disproportionately prevalent in business education.

The combination of Belbin’s team role model and Burtle test to monitor the impact of the feedback game provides insights on students' attitudes to feedback giving and receiving as well as on their motivations. Such insights enable educators to structure learning activities effectively, fostering better collaboration, communication, and overall learning outcomes in the context of business and entrepreneurship education. By placing students in less preferred team roles and uncovering motivational insights, educators can optimize learning experiences and prepare students for real-world business environments, perfecting the lifelong skill of feedback giving and receiving.

4. Discussion

This exploratory study acknowledges the limitations inherent to the Burtle Test when applied to the specific current context. Primarily designed for multiplayer online games (MMOs), the test might not fully capture the nuances of player motivations within a controlled educational setting. Additionally, its reliance on self-evaluation introduces potential biases, as participants may not always be entirely accurate in assessing their own preferences.

Furthermore, applying a model focused primarily on player motivations in online games to a controlled educational environment presents potential shortcomings. The gamified learning context, while drawing inspiration from game mechanics, differs significantly from the free-form exploration and competition often characteristic of MMOs.

To address these limitations, we employed a two-pronged approach. First, the Burtle test was used in conjunction with the feedback game. This combined assessment strategy aimed to gain a more comprehensive understanding of player motivations within the specific context of gamified learning. By analyzing both self-reported preferences and actual behavior within the game environment, we sought to create a richer picture of student motivations, collecting quantitative and qualitative data.

Second, the study incorporated team dynamics through the feedback game itself. This enriched the data collection process by capturing team-based interactions and self-reported perceptions. Analyzing how assigned Belbin roles, group dynamics, and feedback mechanisms within the game influenced these aspects provided insights beyond individual player motivations independent of the Burtle test.

Regarding the sample size of twenty-four participants, while a relevant starting point for investigating group dynamics within business administration and entrepreneurial education, it might limit the generalizability of the findings to the wider student population. A larger sample size would allow for a more robust statistical analysis and ultimately provide stronger evidence for the conclusions drawn. Still, even with this relatively coarse data, there are patterns that are worth further study. In addition, the theoretical frameworks at the core of this experimental study enhance the generalizability of the suggested relationships.

Future research could a larger and more diverse group of participants. This would strengthen the generalizability of the results and allow for a more nuanced understanding of how player motivations and team dynamics interactions within gamified learning environments across different student populations. Additionally, exploring adaptations of the Burtle test or developing a new instrument specifically tailored to assess player motivations in gamified learning could provide more precise data on student preferences within the specific educational context.

Research on pedagogical tools for use in entrepreneurship education reveals that games can be an effective teaching method in class (Kauppinen & Choudhary 2021). Building upon the work of Lyons et al. (2023).Our findings confirm that perceived learning and perceived engagement remain the two main factors influencing the effectiveness of gamification in entrepreneurial education.

5. Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, a similar study combining the profile and motivation of learners has not been found in the scientific literature of gamified educational tools. Despite all the limitations discussed above, our approach combines group evaluation with self-evaluation within a gamified setting in the context of extrepreneurship. The results suggest that most of the students identify themselves as solo players and with profiles of “Killers”, consistent with their discomfort in taking on team roles as Coordinators and Implementers.

The key findings reveal that the majority of participants (92%) recognized the importance of feedback skills and appreciated the opportunity to receive constructive criticism within the game environment. The feedback game was perceived as beneficial by most students, leading to increased self-awareness of strengths and weaknesses. Students reported a shift towards a more open and growth-oriented mindset regarding feedback. The conducted game facilitated improvements in self-reported teamwork skills and communication. The unexpected results that need special attention is the dominance of the “Killer” type in the Bartle Test, indicating a strong competitive self-centered motivation among participants. Further research is needed to explore the reasons behind this prevalence and its potential impact on learning outcomes and entrepreneurial success. The study could also benefit from a larger and more diverse sample to enhance the generalizability of the findings.

The combined use of Belbin team roles and the Bartle Test provides valuable insights into student motivations and team dynamics. By incorporating regular feedback training and gamified learning experiences that cater to diverse player types, educators can foster a more collaborative and growth-oriented learning environment. This can better prepare students for the complexities of communication and feedback exchange in real-world business settings.

This exploratory study on gamified learning for business and entrepreneurship education can enhance the curriculum design, team formation, and the development of engaging learning experiences and skill building. By integrating an adaptation of the Belbin’s team role model and insights from the Burtle test educators can create a more multifaceted and effective learning environment, promoting lifelong skills such as feedback giving and receiving.

This study, despite the acknowledged limitations of the Burtle test and the relatively small sample size, employed a well-structured approach to investigate group dynamics and improve feedback giving and receiving within the context of business administration and entrepreneurial education. By integrating the Belbin’s team role model and insights from the Burtle test enable educators to create a more nuanced and engaging learning experience. This approach caters to diverse student motivations and feedback-related skills, fostering a richer educational environment that better prepares students for real-world challenges related to team dynamics. The findings suggest that this combined assessment strategy can significantly enhance the effectiveness of gamified learning experiences by aligning educational activities with individual motivators and team outcomes, in favor of developing a lifelong skill such as feedback giving and receiving.

Acknowledgments and Funding

This study is financed by the European Union – NextGenerationEU, through the National Recovery and Resilience Plan of the Republic of Bulgaria, project SUMMIT BG-RRP-2.004-0008-C01. Previous versions of the feedback game have been developed for educational purposes in collaboration with Milena Nikolova, Velina Getova and Julian Asenov.

REFERENCES

ALABBASI, D., 2017. Exploring Graduate Students' Perspectives towards Using Gamification Techniques in Online Learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, vol. 18, pp. 180 – 196.

ANDONOVA, V.; NIKOLOVA, M. & DIMITROV, D., 2019. Entrepreneurial Ecosystems in Unexpected Places: Examining the Success Factors of Regional Entrepreneurship. Palgrave MacMillan.

ANDONOVA, V.; REINOSO-CARVALHO, F.; JIMENEZ, M. & CARRASQUILLA, D., 2023. Does multisensory stimulation with virtual reality (VR) and smell improve learning? An educational experience in recall and creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1176697. [Accessed: 20 Aug 2024].

BELBIN, R. M., 1993. Team roles at work. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

BUCKLEY, P. & DOYLE, E., 2016. Gamification and student motivation. Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1162 – 1175.

BURTLE, R., 1996. Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit MUDs. Journal of MUD Research [online]. Available at: http://mud. co.uk/richard/hcds.htm [Accessed: 20 Jan 2024].

DAHALAN, F.; ALIAS, N. & SHAHAROM, M.S.N., 2024. Gamification and Game Based Learning for Vocational Education and Training: A Systematic Literature Review. Educational Information Technology, vol. 29, pp. 1279 – 1317. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10639-022-11548-w.

DETERDING, S.; DIXON, D.; KHALED, R. & NACKE, L., 2011. From game design elements to gamefulness: defining “gamificationˮ. Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments, pp. 9 – 15.

GAMARRA, M. ; DOMINGUEZ, A. ; VELAZQUEZ, J. & PÁEZ, H., 2021. A gamification strategy in engineering education: A case study on motivation and engagement. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 30, pp. 472 – 482.

KAPP, K. M., 2012. The gamification of learning and instruction: gamebased methods and strategies for training and education. s.l.: John Wiley & Sons.

KAUPPINEN, A. & CHOUDHARY, A., 2021. Gamification in entrepreneurship education: A concrete application of Kahoot! The International Journal of Management Education, vol. 19, no. 3, p. 100563.

LYONS, R.M.; FOX, G. & STEPHENS, S., 2023. Gamification to enhance engagement and higher order learning in entrepreneurial education. Education + Training, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 416 – 432.

MOHD, C. K.; NURAINI, C. K.; MOHAMAD, S. N. M.; SULAIMAN, H.; SHAHBODIN, F. & RAHIM, N., 2023. A review of gamification tools to boost students' motivation and engagement. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, vol. 101, no. 7, pp. 2771 – 2782.

PRZYBYLSKI, A.; DECI, E.; RIGBY, S. & RYAN, M., 2014. Competenceimpeding electronic games and players’ aggressive feelings, thoughts, and behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 106, no. 6, p. 441.

SOMIA, T.; LECHNER, Ch. & LUKE, P., 2024. Assessment and development of coachability in entrepreneurship education. The International Journal of Management Education, vol. 22, no. 1. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100921.

WASSERMAN, N., 2013. The Founder's Dilemmas: Anticipating and Avoiding the Pitfalls That Can Sink a Startup. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

2025 година
Книжка 9s
Книжка 9
DEVELOPMENT OF DEMOCRATIC CULTURE THROUGH CONTENTS ABOUT THE ROMA IN CLASSROOM TEACHING – STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION

Aleksandra Trbojević, Biljana Jeremić, Hadži Živorad Milenović, Bojan Lazić

Книжка 8
КАТЕГОРИАЛНИ ИЗМЕРЕНИЯ НА ИНФОРМАЦИОННО-КОМУНИКАЦИОННИТЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ СЪС СОП

д.п.н Мира Цветкова-Арсова, Данка Щерева, Славина Лозанова, Маргарита Томова

Книжка 7
ВРЪЗКА НА СОЦИАЛНО-ЕМОЦИОНАЛНОТО С КОГНИТИВНОТО РАЗВИТИЕ В ПРИОБЩАВАЩА СРЕДА

Милен Замфиров, Маргарита Бакрачева, Емилия Евгениева

Книжка 6
КОГНИТИВНО РАЗВИТИЕ НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ, ОБХВАНАТИ В ПРИОБЩАВАЩОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Милен Замфиров, Емилия Евгениева, Маргарита Бакрачева

Книжка 5
COMPETENCE FOR SOCIAL PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICE: WHAT DO STUDENTS TELL US?

Maya Tcholakova, Marina Pironkova, Aleksandar Ranev, Yana Staneva

MULTIMODAL COMMUNICATION IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION CLASSES

Cristiana Lucretia Pop, Cristina Filip

Книжка 4s
GAMES IN FUNCTION OF DEVELOPMENT OF MULTIPLICATION SKILLS

Dasare Sylejmani, Vesna Makashevska, Jasmina Jovanovska

Книжка 4
ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА СИСТЕМИТЕ ЗА УПРАВЛЕНИЕ НА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО В КОНТЕКСТА НА ИНТЕРАКТИВНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Силвия Парушева, Борис Банков, Гергана Касабова, Петя Страшимирова

MILITARY AND SOCIAL THREATS AS DETERMINANTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONTEMPORARY UKRAINIAN HIGHER EDUCATION

Mykola Pantiuk, Tetiana Pantiuk, Nataliia Bakhmat, Olena Nevmerzhytska, Svitlana Ivakh

STEM ОБУЧЕНИЕ НА СТУДЕНТИ ПЕДАГОЗИ В ТРАНСДИСЦИПЛИНАРНА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА СРЕДА

Любен Витанов, Николай Цанев, Людмила Зафирова, Гергана Христова, Катерина Динкова, Калина Георгиева, Жорж Кюшев, Здравка Савчева

ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ И АНАЛИЗ НА НАГЛАСИТЕ НА СТУДЕНТИТЕ ПРИ ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА ГЕНЕРАТИВЕН ИНСТРУМЕНТ НА ИЗКУСТВЕН ИНТЕЛЕКТ

Николай Янев, Иглика Гетова, Теодора Христова, Ива Костадинова, Георги Димитров

Книжка 3
ДРУГИЯТ КАТО ЦЕННОСТ В УЧИЛИЩЕ

Александър Кръстев

Книжка 2
ASSESSMENTS OF TEACHERS AND PARENTS OF CHILDREN WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ON INCLUSION IN PRE-SCHOOL INSTITUTIONS

Zagorka Markov, Hadzi Zivorad Milenovic, Biljana Jeremic, Radmila Zecevic, Milica Pavlovic

Книжка 1s
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА СРЕДСТВАТА ЗА ДОПЪЛВАЩА И АЛТЕРНАТИВНА КОМУНИКАЦИЯ В ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИТЕ ИНСТИТУЦИИ В БЪЛГАРИЯ

. Неда Балканска, . Анна Трошева-Асенова, . Пенка Шапкова, Снежина Михайлова

USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING

Ekaterina Sofronieva, Christina Beleva, Galina Georgieva

Книжка 1
Скъпи читатели, автори, приятели на списание „Педагогика“,

В началото на 2025 година в първия брой на нашето списание „Педагогика“ бих искала от името на редакционната колегия и от мое име да Ви пожелая здраве, творческо вдъхновение и професионално удовлетворение от прино- са Ви към педагогическата наука и практика! Вярвам и се надявам, че списание „Педагоги- ка“ ще продължи да осигурява платформа за научен, обективен и откровен диалог, базиран на резултати от научни изследвания, за насто- ящето и бъдещето на обучението и образова- н

2024 година
Книжка 9s
Книжка 9
ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT OF VIDEO LEARNING RESOURCES IN SMALL-SCALE LEARNING SCENARIOS

César Córcoles, Laia Blasco-Soplon, Germán Cobo Rodríguez, Ana-Elena Guerrero-Roldán

Книжка 8
АНГАЖИРАНОСТ КЪМ УЧЕНЕ ЧРЕЗ ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА СМАРТ ТЕХНОЛОГИИТЕ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Кирилка Тагарева, Дора Левтерова-Гаджалова, Ваня Сивакова

Книжка 7
Книжка 6
Книжка 5s
ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВАТА НА СТАЖАНТСКАТА ПРАКТИКА ПРЕД СТУДЕНТИ – БЪДЕЩИ УЧИТЕЛИ

Илиана Петкова, Марияна Илиева, Владислава Станоева, Георги Чавдаров

Книжка 5
FEATURES OF SPEECH COMPREHENSION TRAINING OF CHILDREN WITH AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS

Maryna Branytska, Svitlana Myronova, Svitlana Mykhalska

OVERVIEW OF THE STEM EDUCATION IN ISRAEL

Aharon Goldreich, Elena Karashtranova

Книжка 4
НАГЛАСИ НА СТУДЕНТИТЕ КЪМ СМАРТ ТЕХНОЛОГИИТЕ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Дора Левтерова-Гаджалова, Кирилка Тагарева, Ваня Сивакова

PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT FOR YOUNG RESEARCHERS

Emina Vukašinović, Marija Veselinović, Milan Milikić

РОБОТИТЕ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО – ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА STEAM ИГРА

Мария Желязкова, Михаил Кожухаров, Даниела Кожухарова

Книжка 3s
Книжка 3
ATTITUDES AND EXPERIENCES OF THE PRESCHOOL TEACHERS IN THE APPLICATION OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION

Nataša Branković, Gordana Kozoderović, Biljana Jeremić, Danijela Petrović, Bojan Lazić, Slavica Karanović

ДИГИТАЛНИ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ПОДКРЕПА НА УЧЕНЕТО

Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова, Лъчезар Лазаров

PREPARATION OF FUTURE TEACHERS FOR ORGANISING A HEALTH-PRESERVING INCLUSIVE SPACE IN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

Nadiya Skotna, Tetiana Nadimyanova, Anna Fedorovych, Myroslava Sosiak, Oksana Yatsiv

Книжка 2s
Книжка 2
ОТ РИСУНКА – КЪМ СНИМКА

Камен Теофилов

Книжка 1s
Книжка 1
„ВТОРОТО“ БЪЛГАРСКО УЧИЛИЩЕ. ГЕНЕЗИСЪТ

Пенка Цонева, Бистра Мизова

2023 година
Книжка 9
EXPLORING THE NARRATIVE IDENTITY OF HUNGARIAN TEACHERS IN SLOVAKIA

Patrik Baka, Terézia Stredl, Kinga Horváth, Zsuzsanna Huszár, Melinda Nagy, Péter Tóth, András Németh

Книжка 8
A QUALITY “ONLINE” TEACHER – WHAT DO STUDENTS APPRECIATE AND VALUE IN TEACHERS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING?

Irena Golubović-Ilić, Ivana Ćirković-Miladinović, Nataša Vukićević

SUPPORT FOR THE INCLUSION OF ROMA CHILDREN THROUGH THE PROJECT TEACHING MODEL

Biljana Jeremić, Aleksandra Trbojević, Bojan Lazić, Gordana Kozoderović

TREND ANALYSIS OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCES OF SPORTS TEACHERS AND COACHES

Sergejs Capulis, Valerijs Dombrovskis, Svetlana Guseva, Alona Korniseva

Книжка 7
ЦЕННОСТЕН ПРОФИЛ НА УЧИТЕЛИТЕ В НАЦИОНАЛЕН КОНТЕКСТ

Цветан Давидков, Силвия Цветанска

Книжка 6s
MODELLING OF MARITIME CYBER SECURITY EDUCATION AND TRAINING

Gizem Kayisoglu, Pelin Bolat, Emre Duzenli

INTRODUCING THE USE OF CASE STUDIES METHODOLOGY IN TRAINING FOR SOFT SKILLS IN MARITIME UNIVERSITIES. THE ISOL-MET PROGRAM

Maria Lekakou, Helen Iakovaki, Dimitris Vintzilaios, Markella Gota, Giorgos Georgoulis, Thalia Vintzilaiou

THE ROLE OF MARITIME EDUCATION IN DIGITALIZATION

Kamelia Narleva, Yana Gancheva

Книжка 6
С МИСИЯ ЗА НАЦИОНАЛНА И КУЛТУРНА ИНДИВИДУАЛНОСТ

Надежда Кръстева, Йордан Колев

Книжка 5s
PREFACE

Nikola Vaptsarov Naval Academy is the oldest technical educational institution in Bulgaria. The Naval Academy is one of the symbols of Varna and Bulgaria in the world maritime community. Its history and achievements establish it as the most prestigious center for training of maritime specialists. At present, the Naval Academy trains specialists for the Navy and for the merchant marine in all areas of maritime life. Research and development conducted at the Naval Academy in Varna

A FAIR CONCERN ABOUT ECDIS

Nikolay Sozonov, Dilyan Dimitranov

DATA-DRIVEN LEARNING APPROACH TO MARITIME ENGLISH

Jana Kegalj, Mirjana Borucinsky, Sandra Tominac Coslovich

DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS THROUGH THE “CASE STUDY” TEACHING METHOD IN MARITIME ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING (MELT)

Tamila Mikeladze, Svetlana Rodinadze, Zurab Bezhanovi, Kristine Zarbazoia, Medea Abashidze, Kristine Iakobadze

MAXIMIZING STUDENTS’ LEARNING IN MARITIME ENGLISH ONLINE COURSE

Valentyna Kudryavtseva, Svitlana Barsuk, Olena Frolova

Книжка 5
Книжка 4s
Книжка 4
Книжка 3s
СПИРАЛАТА ОБЩЕСТВО – ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Иванка Шивачева-Пинеда

Книжка 3
ПРОЕКТНО БАЗИРАНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ ЗА СОЦИАЛНО-ЕМОЦИОНАЛНИ И ТЕХНОЛОГИЧНИ УМЕНИЯ ЧРЕЗ ПРОГРАМАТА „УМЕНИЯ ЗА ИНОВАЦИИ“

Галин Цоков, Александър Ангелов, Йоанна Минчева, Рени Димова, Мария Цакова

МЕДИЙНАТА ГРАМОТНОСТ И УЧИТЕЛИТЕ

Светла Цанкова, Стела Ангова, Мария Николова, Иван Вълчанов, Илия Вълков, Георги Минев

Книжка 2
INTONATION AND CHILDREN WITH EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL PROBLEMS

Katerina Zlatkova-Doncheva, Vladislav Marinov

Книжка 1
2022 година
Книжка 9
ТРАНСГРЕСИВНО-СИНЕРГИЧНО КАРИЕРНО РАЗВИТИЕ В „НЕФОРМАЛНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ“ В УНИВЕРСИТЕТА

д.п.н Яна Рашева-Мерджанова, Моника Богданова, Илиана Петкова

Книжка 8
INTEGRATING INTERCULTURAL EDUCATION IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOL CURRICULUM

Bujar Adili, Sonja Petrovska, Gzim Xhambazi

НАГЛАСИ НА БЪДЕЩИТЕ ДЕТСКИ УЧИТЕЛИ КЪМ STEM ПОДХОДА

Наталия Павлова, Михаела Тончева

Книжка 7
НАЦИОНАЛНАТА ИДЕЯ НА ПАИСИЙ ХИЛЕНДАРСКИ

Йордан Колев, Надежда Кръстева

Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ИВАН Д. ШИШМАНОВ – ЕВРОПЕИЗИРАНИЯТ БЪЛГАРИН

Надежда Кръстева, Йордан Колев

THE TECHNOLOGY OF DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNICATIVE CULTURE OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS

Mariia Oliiar, Nataliia Blahun, Halyna Bilavych, Nataliia Bakhmat, Tetyana Pantyuk

Книжка 4
TEACHERS’ATTITUDES BOUT TEACHING AND LEARNING MATHEMATICS

Aleksandra Mihajlović, Emina Kopas-Vukašinović, Vladimir Stanojević

EDUCATION 4.0 – THE CHANGE OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE LABOUR MARKET

Gergana Dimitrova, Blaga Madzhurova, Stefan Raychev, Dobrinka Stoyanova

Книжка 3s
DISTANCE LEARNING IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMICS

Baktybek Keldibekov, Shailoobek Karagulov

DIGITAL UNIVERSITIES: FEATURES AND KEY CHARACTERISTICS

Marina Skiba, Maktagali Bektemessov, Alma Turganbayeva

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
TWO-TIER MODEL OF TRAINING FUTURE TEACHERS FOR COACHING AT OUT-OF-SCHOOL INSTITUTIONS

Borys Savchuk, Tetyana Pantyuk, Natalia Sultanova, Halyna Bilavych, Mykola Pantyuk

Книжка 1
2021 година
Книжка 9
ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЕТО МЕЖДУ ФОРМАЛНОТО И НЕФОРМАЛНОТО ЗДРАВНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Доц. д-р Вержиния Боянова Гл. ас. д-р Константин Теодосиев Гл. ас. д-р Берджухи Йорданова

FORMATION OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE OF ASSISTANT TEACHER OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN SECONDARY EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

Prof. Dr. Vladyslava Liubarets, Prof. Dr. Nataliia Bakhmat, Prof. Dr. Olena Matviienko, Oksana Tsykhmeistruk, Inna Feltsan

Книжка 8
ОТНОСНО ЗАДЪЛЖИТЕЛНОСТТА НА ПРЕДУЧИЛИЩНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ – РЕЗУЛТАТИ ОТ ЕДНО ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ

Проф. д-р Маргарита Колева, доц. д-р Блага Джорова, д-р Ева Жечева

INFLUENCE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PEDAGOGICAL FEATURES OF STUDENTS ON THEIR ACTIVITY IN SELF-EDUCATION

Dr. Iryna Sereda, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Svitlana Karskanova, Assoc. Prof.

CENTRALISATION AND DECENTRALISATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HUNGARY AND GERMANY

Carla Liege Rodrigues Pimenta, Prof. Dr. Zolt†n R–nay, Prof. Dr. Andr†s Nmet

ЗА ПРИОБЩАВАНЕТО, ОБУЧЕНИЕТО И РАЗВИТИЕТО НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ С ИНТЕЛЕКТУАЛНИ ЗАТРУДНЕНИЯ

Златкова-Дончева, К. (2021). Приобщаване, обучение и развитие на деца и ученици с интелектуални затруднения. Бургас: Либра СКОРП, ISBN 978-954-471-705-6

Книжка 7s
CONCEPT OF PRESENT PRACTICE IN CHOOSING OF OPTIMAL NUMBER OF TUGS

Rino Bošnjak, Zvonimir Lušić , Filip Bojić, Dario Medić

S-101 CHARTS, DATABASE TABLES FOR S-101 CHARTS, AUTONOMOUS VESSEL

Vladimir Brozović, Danko Kezić, Rino Bošnjak, Filip Bojić

INFLUENCE OF HYDRO-METEOROLOGICAL ELEMENTS ON THE SHIP MANOEUVRING IN THE CITY PORT OF SPLIT

Zvonimir Lušić , Nenad Leder, Danijel Pušić, Rino Bošnjak

MEETING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS – EXPERIENCE FROM THE LARGEST SHIPPING COMPANIES

Katarina Balić , Helena Ukić Boljat, Gorana Jelić Mrčelić, Merica Slišković

OPTIMISING THE REFERENCE POINT WITHIN A JOURNAL BEARING USING LASER ALIGNMENT

Ty Aaron Smith , Guixin Fan , Natalia Nikolova , Kiril Tenekedjiev

REVIEW OF THE CURRENT INCREASE OF NOISE UNIT COST VALUES IN TRANSPORT

Luka Vukić , Ivan Peronja , Mihaela Bukljaš , Alen Jugović

TARGET DETECTION FOR VISUAL COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM

Miro Petković, Danko Kezić, Igor Vujović, Ivan Pavić

NEW RESULTS FOR TEACHING SHIP HANDLING USING FAST TIME SIMULATION

Knud Benedict , MichŽle Schaub , Michael Baldauf , Michael Gluch , Matthias Kirchhoff , Caspar Krüger

POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF ELECTRICALY DRIVEN FERRY, CASE STUDY

Tina Perić, Ladislav Stazić, Karlo Bratić

SITUATIONAL AWARENESS – KEY SAFETY FACTOR FOR THE OFFICER OF THE WATCH

Hrvoje Jaram, Pero Vidan, Srđan Vukša, Ivan Pavić

Книжка 7
INCLUSIVE INTELLIGENCE

Dr. Aleksandar Krastev, Assist. Prof.

EDUCATION OF MORAL CULTURE OF STUDENT YOUTH IN THE CONDITIONS OF POLYCULTURAL SPACE

Dr. Natalia Bondarenko, Assoc. Prof. Yevhen Rozdymakha Dr. Lyudmila Oderiy, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Anatoly Rozdymakha, Assoc. Prof. Dilyana Arsova, PhD student

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN KOSOVO – RESEARCH OF TRAINING PROGRAMS AND TESTS

Bekim Samadraxha, Veton Alihajdari, Besim Mustafa, Ramë Likaj

Книжка 6s
EVALUATION OF CRUISER TRAFFIC VARIABLES IN SEAPORTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA

Maja Račić, Katarina Balić, Mira Pavlinović, Antonija Mišura

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CONTRACTS FOR MARITIME TRANSPORT SERVICES. CHAIN OF CHARTER PARTIES

Svetlana Dimitrakieva, Ognyan Kostadinov, Christiana Atanasova

THE LIGHTSHIP MASS CALCULATION MODEL OF A MERCHANT SHIP BY EMPIRICAL METHODS

Vedran Slapničar , Katarina Zadro , Viktor Ložar , Ivo Ćatipović

ON EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN MARITIME COMMUNICATIONS AND THE GMDSS DURING THE COVID-19

Chavdar Alexandrov, Grozdyu Grozev, Georgi Dimitrov, Avgustin Hristov

AIR POLLUTANT EMISSION MEASUREMENT

Nikola Račić, Branko Lalić, Ivan Komar, Frane Vidović, Ladislav Stazić

ASSESSMENT OF LNG BUNKERING ACCIDENTS

Peter Vidmar, Andrej Androjna

EGR OPERATION INFLUENCE ON THE MARINE ENGINE EFFICIENCY

Delyan Hristov, Ivan Ivanov, Dimitar Popov

THE MEASUREMENT OF EXHAUST GAS EMISSIONS BY TESTO 350 MARITIME – EXHAUST GAS ANALYZER

Bruna Bacalja, Maja Krčum, Tomislav Peša, Marko Zubčić

PROPELLER LOAD MODELLING IN THE CALCULATIONS OF MARINE SHAFTING TORSIONAL VIBRATIONS

Nenad Vulić, Karlo Bratić, Branko Lalić, Ladislav Stazić

MODELING OF THE DEPENDENCE OF CO

Hristo Hristov, Ivailo Bakalov, Bogdan Shopov, Dobromir Yovkov

TECHNICAL DIAGNOSTICS OF MARINE EQUIPMENT WITH PSEUDO-DISCRETE FEATURES

Guixin Fan , Natalia Nikolova , Ty Smith , Kiril Tenekedjiev

CONTRIBUTION TO THE REDUCTION OF THE SHIP’S SWITCHBOARD BY APPLYING SENSOR TECHNOLOGY

Nediljko Kaštelan, Marko Zubčić, Maja Krčum, Miro Petković

THE STAND FOR FIN DRIVES ENERGY TESTING

Andrzej Grządziela , Marcin Kluczyk , Tomislav Batur

INTRODUCTION OF 3D PRINTING INTO MARINE ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION – A CASE STUDY

Ivica Kuzmanić, Igor Vujović, Zlatan Kulenović, Miro Petković

SHIPYARD CRANE MODELING METHODS

Pawel Piskur, Piotr Szymak, Bartosz Larzewski

Книжка 6
TEACHERS' PERSPECTIVE ON THE EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF ONLINE TEACHING

Dr. Julien-Ferencz Kiss, Prof. Dr. Florica Orțan, Dr. Laurențiu Mˆndrea

ПСИХОЛОГО-ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ ПРАВИЛА, МОДЕЛИ НА ДОБРИ ПРАКТИКИ И ПРЕПОРЪКИ ПРИ РАБОТАТА И ОБУЧЕНИЕТО НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ С ПОВЕДЕНЧЕСКИ РАЗСТРОЙСТВА

Тричков, Ив., 2019. Психолого-педагогически правила, модели на добри прак- тики и препоръки при работата и обучението на деца и ученици

Книжка 5
ФИДАНА ДАСКАЛОВА ЗА ПЕДАГОГИКАТА

Маргарита Колева, Йордан Колев

ВОЕННОМОРСКОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ – ЕДИН РАЗЛИЧЕН ПОГЛЕД

Кожухаров, А. (2021). Личните академични документи на българската военна образователна система (1892 – 1946). Варна: ВВМУ, ISBN 978-619-7428-55-1

Книжка 4
Книжка 3
НЕВРОДИДАКТИКА

Наталия Витанова

ЗА АСИСТИРАЩИТЕ И ИНФОРМАЦИОННИТЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Сивакова, В. (2020). Асистиращи и информационни технологии

Книжка 2
ОВЛАДЯВАНЕ НА КЛЮЧОВИ КОМПЕТЕНЦИИ ПРИ ОРИЕНТИРАНЕ В СВЕТА

Стоянова, М. (2019). Овладяване на ключови компетенции при ориентиране в света. София: Авангард принт, ISBN 978-954-337-398-7 374

Книжка 1
BULGARIAN SCHOOL – SHOWCASE OF IDENTITY

Veska Gyuviyska, Nikolay Tsankov

ЗА ИЗБОРА НА УЧЕБЕН КОМПЛЕКТ ПО БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕЗИК И ЛИТЕРАТУРА В НАЧАЛЕН ЕТАП. И ЗА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО

Георгиева, А. (2020). Съвременни проекции на обучението по български език

КОНТРОЛ НА СТРЕСА. ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКИ И УПРАВЛЕНСКИ РАКУРСИ

Стоянов, В. (2020). Управление на стреса в организацията. Психологически и управленски ракурси. 198 cтр., Варна: Стено, ISBN 978-619-241-119-0

2020 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
EDUCATIONAL REASONS FOR EARLY SCHOOL DROP-OUT

Maria Teneva, Zlatka Zhelyazkova

Книжка 7s
TEACHING CHALLENGES IN SPORTS EDUCATION DURING THE PANDEMIC COVID-19

Evelina Savcheva, Galina Domuschieva-Rogleva

THE DIFFERENCES IN STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES ABOUT ONLINE TEACHING DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Aleksić Veljković Aleksandra , Slađana Stanković , Irena Golubović-Ilić , Katarina Herodek

ONLINE EDUCATION DURING PANDEMIC, ACCORDING TO STUDENTS FROM TWO BULGARIAN UNIVERSITIES

Antoaneta Getova¹ , Eleonora Mileva² , Boryana Angelova-Igova²

Книжка 7
ПОДГОТОВКАТА НА ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ КАДРИ ЗА ПРЕДУЧИЛИЩНИТЕ ВЪЗПИТАТЕЛНИ ЗАВЕДЕНИЯ ПРЕЗ ПЕРИОДА 1944 – 1991 ГОДИНА

Въчева, С. (2019). Подготовката на педагогически кадри за предучилищните възпитателни заведения през периода

ПАЗАРНИ МЕХАНИЗМИ В УЧИЛИЩНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ. ТЕОРЕТИКО-ПРИЛОЖНИ ВЪПРОСИ

Първанова, Й. (2020) Пазарни механизми в училищното образование. Теоретико-приложни въпроси. София: Колбис, ISBN 978-619-7284-35-5

Книжка 6
TEACHERS ATTITUDES ABOUT INTEGRATED APPROACH IN TEACHING

Emina Kopas-Vukašinović, Aleksandra Mihajlović, Olivera Cekić-Jovanović

Книжка 5
КОНЦЕПТУАЛНИ МОДЕЛИ ЗА РАЗРАБОТВАНЕ НА ПОЗНАВАТЕЛНИ ОНЛАЙН ИГРИ В ОБЛАСТТА НА КУЛТУРНОТО НАСЛЕДСТВО

Детелин Лучев, Десислава Панева-Мариновa, Радослав Павлов Гита Сенка Лилия Павлова

ТАЛАНТЛИВ ПЕДАГОГ И КУЛТУРЕН ДЕЕЦ

Севда Чобанова, Любен Десев

Книжка 4
A CONTINUUM OF APPROACHES TO SCHOOL INSPECTIONS: CASES FROM EUROPE

Rossitsa Simeonova, Yonka Parvanova Martin Brown, Sarah Gardezi, Joe O’Hara, Gerry McNamara Laura del Castillo Blanco Zacharoula Kechri, Eleni Beniata

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2019 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НА БЪДЕЩЕТО

Наталия Витанова

Книжка 7
МОДЕЛ НА РАБОТА В ИНТЕРКУЛТУРНА СРЕДА

(Научноизследователска саморефлексия)

RISK FACTORS FOR EARLY SCHOOL LEAVING IN BULGARIA

Elena Lavrentsova, Petar Valkov

ПРИНОСИ НА ЕЛКА ПЕТРОВА ЗА БЪЛГАРСКОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

(100 години от рождението на проф. д.п.н. Елка Петрова – 27.10.1919 – 21.12.2012)

НАСОКИ ЗА ПРИОБЩАВАНЕ НА МАРГИНАЛНИ СЕМЕЙНИ ОБЩНОСТИ В ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИТЕ ИНСТИТУЦИИ

Нунев, Й. (2019). Насоки за приобщаване на маргинални семейни общности в образователните институции. Велико Търново: Св. св. Кирил и Методий, ISBN 978-619-208-186-7

Книжка 6
ДИОФАНТОВИ УРАВНЕНИЯ И СИСТЕМИ ДИОФАНТОВИ УРАВНЕНИЯ – ТЕОРЕТИЧНИ АСПЕКТИ И МЕТОДИЧЕСКА ПРОЕКЦИЯ В НАЧАЛНИЯ ЕТАП НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Владимира Ангелова. (2018). Диофантови уравнения и системи диофантови уравнения – теоретични аспекти и методическа проекция в начален етап на образование. Пловдив: Паисий Хилендарски, ISBN 978-619-202-394-2

ЕДНА НОВА КНИГА ЗА ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИТЕ УМЕНИЯ НА УЧИТЕЛИТЕ

Николай Колишев. (2018). Теория на педагогическите умения на учителите. София: Захарий Стоянов, ISBN: 9789540912066

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА ИЗСЛЕДОВАТЕЛСКИЯ ПОДХОД ПРИ ОБУЧЕНИЕ НА СТУДЕНТИ ПЕДАГОЗИ

(върху примера на обучение по академичната дисциплина „Съвременни аспекти на гражданското образование“ на студенти педагози)

LEARNING MATURITY

Alina G“mbuță Daniela-Carmen Berințan Marijana Mikulandra Krzysztof Kij Katja Sivka

Книжка 2
ДЕТЕТО И ПЕДАГОГИКАТА

Рашева-Мерджанова, Ян., Петкова, Ил. & Господинов, Вл. (съст.). (2018). Детето и педагогиката. София: Просвета, ISBN 978-954-01-3806-0

Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ КОЛЕГИ,

Редакционната колегия на списание „Педаго- гика“ ви честити Новата 2019 година! Пожела- ваме ви от сърце тя да бъде щастлива, успешна и благословена! През отминалата юбилейна 2018 г. публику- вахме редица стойностни материали на универ- ситетски преподаватели, учители, разнородни специалисти, работещи в сферата на образова- нието, докторанти. Отбелязани бяха поредица от тематични конференции и юбилейни празни- ци. Получихме и международно признание чрез включването на списанието

УЧЕНИЧЕСКО САМОУПРАВЛЕНИЕ

Желязкова-Тея, Т. & Банчева, М. (2018). Ученическото самоуправление. София: Аз-буки. ISBN: 978-619-7065-20-6

2018 година
Книжка 9
ПРАВАТА НА ДЕТЕТО ПРЕЗ ПОГЛЕДА НА СТУДЕНТИ ПЕДАГОЗИ

Йорданка Николова, Даниела Рачева

Книжка 8
СПОДЕЛЕНО МНЕНИЕ

Николова, М. & Михалева, Б. (2018). С увереност срещу агресията и кон-

Книжка 7
РАДОСТТА ОТ ОБЩУВАНЕТО НА ЧУЖД ЕЗИК В ДЕТСТВОТО

Екатерина Софрониева, Христина Белева

НОВО ТЕОРЕТИКО-ПРАКТИЧЕСКО ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА ДЕТСКОТО ТВОРЧЕСТВО

Енгелс-Критидис, Р. (2018). Децата и творчеството. Юбилеен сборник в чест

ПРОФ. Д-Р ЕЛЕНА РУСИНОВА-БАХУДЕЙЛА

Розалина Енгелс-Критидис

Книжка 6
ПОЗИТИВНА УЧЕБНА СРЕДА

Валентина Шарланова

SENIOR CITIZENS’ EXISTENTIAL NEEDS AND EDUCATION FOR THE MEANING OF LIFE

Joanna Łukasik, Norbert Pikuła, Katarzyna Jagielska

Книжка 5
ПЛАНОМЕРНО ПСИХИЧЕСКО РАЗВИТИЕ

(По случай 115 г. от рождението на П.Я. Галперин)

ПАРАДИГМАТА СЕМИОТИКА – ЕЗИК – ДЕТЕ ПРИ 6 – 7-ГОДИШНИТЕ

Жоржетина Атанасова, Любимка Габрова

ПАРАРОДИТЕЛСКАТА ГРИЖА ВЪВ ФОКУСА НА ЕДИН СОЦИАЛНОПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ АНАЛИЗ

Ковачка, Ю. (2017). Социалнопедагогически проблеми при деца с парародителска грижа. Благоевград: УИ „Неофит Рилски“, 144 стр. ISBN: 9789540001340

Книжка 4
ДЕТСКИ КОНФЕРЕНЦИИ

Боряна Иванова

СТЕРЕОТИПИЗАЦИЯ НА ЕТНИЧЕСКИТЕ ВЗАИМООТНОШЕНИЯ ПРИ СЪВРЕМЕННИТЕ МЛАДИ БЪЛГАРИ

Зорница Ганева. (2017). Стереотипизация на етническите взаимоотношения при съвременните млади българи. София: Елестра. ISBN 978-619-7292-03-9

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
СЪВРЕМЕННИ МЕТАМОРФОЗИ НА ВЗАИМООТНОШЕНИЯТА В ДЕТСКАТА ГРУПА

Веселина Иванова, Виолета Кърцелянска-Станчева

SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES AS SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS

Emilj Sulejmani Shikjerije Sulejmani

ОТНОСНО УСЕТА ЗА БРОЕНЕ

Петър Петров, Мима Трифонова

Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ КОЛЕГИ И ПРИЯТЕЛИ,

Редакционната колегия на сп.„Педагогика“ Ви честити Новата 2018 г. Пожелаваме ви тя да бъде здрава, щедра и благословена! Тази година списанието чества своя юбилей – 90 години от неговото публикуване за първи път през 1928 г. с името „Народна просвета“. От деня на създаване до сега, то отразява актуал- ните проблеми на педагогическата наука и прак- тика и остава верен спътник на хиляди научни работници, учители, докторанти. Вярваме, че силата на творческата ни енергия ще пом

ДОБРИ ПРАКТИКИ „ПАРТНЬОРСТВО РОДИТЕЛИ – УЧИЛИЩЕ“

Мехмед Имамов, Калинка Гайтанинчева

2017 година
Книжка 9
ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКОТО УЧЕНИЕ НА Й. ФР. ХЕРБАРТ – ИСТОРИЯ И СЪВРЕМЕННОСТ

(По повод 240 г. от неговото рождение) Невена Филипова

Книжка 8
ЧЕТЯЩИЯТ СТУДЕНТ, ЧЕТЯЩОТО ДЕТЕ – ЕДНО МАЛКО ПРОЗОРЧЕ, ЕДНА ВЕЛИЧЕСТВЕНА ГЛЕДКА

Мариана Мандева, Боряна Туцева, Габриела Николова, Цветелина Ковачева

Книжка 7
ДИДАКТИЧЕСКИ КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТИ

Нели Митева, Наталия Витанова

Илияна Кунева

Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ИЗСЛЕДОВАТЕЛСКО ОБУЧЕНИЕ В АКАДЕМИЧНА СРЕДА

(Научно-теоретична рефлексия) Румяна Неминска

ПРИНОС В ПСИХОЛОГИЯТА НА ТВОРЧЕСТВОТО

(120 години от рождението на Лев Семьонович Виготски) Любен Десев

ЛЕВ СEМЬОНОВИЧ ВИГОТСКИ – ПСИХОЛОГ И НА ХХI ВЕК

(по случай 120 години от рождението му)

ИСКУССТВО В ЖИЗНИ ЛЮДЕЙ

Гульнар Омарова

НОВА И ПОЛЕЗНА КНИГА

Йонка Първанова

ПРИНОСЕН ТРУД КЪМ МЕТОДИКАТА НА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО ПО БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕЗИК И ЛИТЕРАТУРА В НАЧАЛНОТО УЧИЛИЩЕ

М. Мандева (2017). Методика на обучението по български език и литература – I – IV клас. Начално ограмотяване. В. Търново: УИ „Св. св. Кирил и Методий“, 120 стр.

ЕДНО ФУНДАМЕНТАЛНО ИНТЕГРАЛНО ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА РОЛЯТА НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО ЗА РАЗВИТИЕТО НА НООСФЕРНИЯ ИНТЕЛЕКТ

Марга Георгиева, Сава Гроздев. (2016). Морфодинамиката за развитието на ноосферния интелект. София: Изток-Запад, ISBN 978-619-152-869-1

Книжка 4
Книжка 3
СИСТЕМАТИЧНО ВЪВЕДЕНИЕ В ОБЩАТА И ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКАТА СИНЕРГЕТИКА

Любен Десев (2015). Синергетика. Въведение и речник. 777 термина. София: ИК „Екопрогрес“. 464 с. ISBN 978-954-2970-37-8

Книжка 2
ПРОБЛЕМИ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВИ В РАЗВИТИЕТО НА ХУДОЖЕСТВЕНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ У НАС ПРЕЗ ПОГЛЕДА НА ДЕТСКИЯ И НАЧАЛНИЯ УЧИТЕЛ

Теодора Власева, Даниела Гирджева-Валачева, Мария Калоферова, Найден Младенов, Илияна Шотлекова

ЗАКЪСНЯЛО ПРИЗНАНИЕ

Доц. д-р Емилия Николова

Книжка 1
ФАКТОРИ ЗА УСПЕШНО ПРИЛАГАНЕ НА СМЕСЕНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова Лъчезар Лазаров

ЗА СТОПЛЕНИТЕ ПЪТЕКИ КЪМ ЛИТЕРАТУРНОТО ПОЗНАНИЕ

Радев, Радослав. 2015. Технология на методите в обучението по литература. Варна: Славена, 247 с., ISBN 978-619-190-041-1

2016 година
Книжка 9
ИНТЕРАКТИВНИ ТЕХНИКИ ЗА ОВЛАДЯВАНЕ НА ЧЕТЕНЕТО В МУЛТИКУЛТУРНАТА КЛАСНА СТАЯ – ПЪРВИ КЛАС

ФОРМИРАНЕ НА РЕЧЕВА КУЛТУРА, В НАЧАЛНА УЧИЛИЩНА ВЪЗРАСТ, (АНАЛИЗ НА АНКЕТА С УЧИТЕЛИ

Кампания

на Института за български език – БАН, и вестник „Аз-буки“

Книжка 8
Книжка 7
IBM SPSS STATISTICS ПРЕЗ ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИЯ ПОГЛЕД НА ДОЦ. Д-Р ЗОРНИЦА ГАНЕВА

Зорница Ганева (2016). Да преоткрием статистиката с IBM SPSS Statistics. София: Елестра. 712 стр. ISBN 978-619-7292-01-5

НАЧАЛНОТО ОГРАМОТЯВАНЕ – „КЛЮЧ“ ЗА УСПЕШЕН ЖИВОТ В ПРОМЕНЯЩИЯ СЕ СВЯТ

Мариана Мандева, Диляна Гаджева (2016). Начално ограмотяване

ОТ „ЧУДНА И ДИВНА ДАСКАЛЕТИНКА“ ДО ПЕДАГОГИКА ЗА НАЦИОНАЛНО СЛУЧВАНЕ

Виолета Атанасова (2015) Петко Славейков за образованието. Шумен: Унивeрситетско издателство „Епископ Константин Преславски. 208 с. ISBN 978-619-201-051-5

Книжка 6
УЧИЛИЩЕ ЗА ЧЕТЕНЕ

Петя Георгиева

Кампания

на Института за български език – БАН, и в. „Аз Буки“

ДОШЛА ЛИ Е ИНСПЕКТОРЪТ?

Ванина Сумрова

ЩЕ ТЕ ЧАКАМ В/НА ЦЕНТЪРА

Илияна Гаравалова

ПРАВО В ДЕСЕТКАТА

Ивелина Стоянова

ПРОФ.Д.П.Н. СТОЯНКА ЖЕКОВА

Редколегия на сп. „Педагогика“

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
СИНЕРГЕТИКА – НОВО НАУЧНО ПОЗНАНИЕ

(Синергетика – въведение и речник, София: ИК Екопрогрес, 2015 г.)

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
НОВА ДИНАМИЧНА МОДИФИКАЦИЯ В ГРАНИЦИТЕ НА „АЗ-КОНЦЕПЦИЯТА“ НА МАТЕМАТИЧЕСКОТО МОДЕЛИРАНЕ

Марга Георгиева & Сава Гроздев. (2015). Морфодинамиката за развитието на ноосферния интелект, София: Марга Георгиева. 323 стр. ISBN 9786199052204

Книжка 1
IN MEMORIAM

На 10.12.2015 г. ни напусна нашият колега и приятел проф. д-р Иван Пет ков Иванов. Той беше уважаван учен и експерт в областта на педагогическите науки – автор на 10 монографии, 8 учебника, 10 учебни помагала, 6 студии и над 100 статии в специализирани периодич- ни издания и научни сборници; участник в 28 между- народни и национални проекта; председател и член на експертни групи към НАОА, член на редакционната ко- легия на сп. „Педагогика“. Проф. д-р Иван Иванов беше уважаван и оби

2015 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
РУСЕНСКИЯТ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ

Златоживка Здравкова

Книжка 7
ДИСКУСИЯТА В УРОКА ПО ЛИТЕРАТУРА

Огняна Георгиева-Тенева

Книжка 6
УЧИТЕЛЯТ ПРАВИ УЧИЛИЩЕТО

ЕЗИКОВАТА ГРАМОТНОСТ НА МАЛКИЯ УЧЕНИК – „КЛЮЧ“ ЗА ОТГОВОРЕН И УСПЕШЕН ЖИВОТ В ПРОМЕНЯЩИЯ СЕ СВЯТ

ГОТОВНОСТ ЗА ОГРАМОТЯВАНЕ

Екатерина Чернева

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЕ МЕЖДУ ИСТОРИЯ, АКАДЕМИЗЪМ И РЕАЛНИ ПРАКТИКИ В СОЦИАЛНОПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКАТА ДЕЙНОСТ

Академични полета на социалната педагогика, съставител: проф. д.п.н. Клавдия Сапунджиева, научна редакция: проф. дпн Клавдия Сапунджиева, проф. д-р Нели Бояджиева, гл. ас. д-р Марина Пиронкова,

НОВА КНИГА

Клавдия Сапунджиева

Книжка 2
ПРОБЛЕМИ НА СОЦИАЛНАТА АДАПТАЦИЯ НА ПЪТУВАЩИ УЧЕНИЦИ ОТ МАЛКИ НАСЕЛЕНИ МЕСТА1)

Траян Попкочев, Бонка Гергинова, Тереза Карамангалова

Турнир по канадска борба [Arm Wrestling Competition] / Д. Евтимова,

Д. Евтимова, Е. Павлова, И. Радославова и Б. Иванов

Книжка 1
ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: THEORY AND REALITY

Inna Leonidovna Fedotenko

ОТЗИВ ЗА КНИГАТА „ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЕН ДИЗАЙН (КОНЦЕПТУАЛНИ ОСНОВАНИЯ И ПРАКТИЧЕСКИ РЕШЕНИЯ)“

Димова, Д. (2013). Образователен дизайн (концептуални основания

2014 година
Книжка 9
„СОФИЯ – УЧЕЩ СЕ ГРАД“ – МОБИЛЕН СЕМИНАР В ПОДКРЕПА НА НЕФОРМАЛНОТО УЧЕНЕ И ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ В ОБЩНОСТТА

ПЕТЪР ДЪНОВ (БЕИНСÀ ДУНÒ Е И БЕЛЕЖИТ, ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ МИСЛИТЕЛ-ХУМАНИСТ, (ПО ПОВОД НА 0-ГОДИШНИНАТА ОТ РОЖДЕНИЕТО, И 70 ГОДИНИ ОТ КОНЧИНАТА МУ

НА УЧИЛИЩЕ – С УСМИВКА!

Снежана Якимова

НА УЧИЛИЩЕ – С УСМИВКА!

Снежана Якимова

УЧИТЕЛЯТ – ЕТАЛОН ЗА ФОРМИРАНЕ НА ДЕТСКАТА ЛИЧНОСТ

Катя Коруджийска, Янка Маринкова

Книжка 8
Книжка 7
ЗАЕДНО МОЖЕМ ПОВЕЧЕ

Диана Смиленова

Книжка 6
УСПЕШНИЯТ УЧИТЕЛ – МЕЖДУ ПРОФЕСИОНАЛНАТА НОРМА И СТРАСТТА ДА ПРЕПОДАВАШ

Проф. д-р Ангел Петров е преподавател по методика на обучението по български език в СУ „Св. Климент Охридски“. Ръководител е на най- старата катедра по методика на филологически- те дисциплини в страната – Катедрата по ме-

Книжка 5
ВЪЗГЛЕДИТЕ НА ЖАН-ЖАК РУСО И ЛЮБЕН КАРАВЕЛОВ ЗА ВЪЗПИТАНИЕТО

Посвещава се на 180-ата годишнина от рождението на Любен Каравелов (1834 – 1879) Виолета Атанасова

LE PROJET PÉDAGOGIQUE, SOURCE DE MOTIVATION DANS L’ENSEIGNEMENT ET L’APPRENTISSAGE DU FLE

THE EDUCATIONAL PROJECT, MEANS OF MOTIVATION IN TEACHING AND LEARNING FLE

LA PÉDAGOGIE DU PROJET ET LA MOTIVATION DES ÉLÈVES POUR L’APPRENTISSAGE DU FRANÇAIS

PROJECT PEDAGOGY AND PUPILS’ MOTIVATION IN LEARNING FRENCH

Книжка 4
КАЖДЫЙ ДЛЯ МЕНЯ УЧИТЕЛЬ

Ш.А.Амонашвили

Книжка 3
АНТОАНЕТА ЙОВЧЕВА (1952 – 2014)

След трудна борба с тежката болест ни напусна един добър и мил човек, една светла личност – Анто- анета Йовчева, нашата обичана колежка Тони. Нейните колеги и приятели, многобройните автори и сътрудници на сп. „Начално образование“ и на сп. „Педагогика“ ще запазят завинаги спомена за нейната приветлива усмивка, за нейната отзивчивост и преда- ност към работата, за нейната широка култура и стре- меж към познание, към развитие. Родена на 20 март 1952 г. в София в интелигентно се- мей

Книжка 2
ПОСТМОДЕРНИЗЪМ И ВЪЗПИТАНИЕ

Клавдия Сапунджиева

ДЕТСКИ УНИВЕРСИТЕТИ

Боряна Иванова

ПРОФ. Д-Р ЕЛКА ПЕТРОВА

Има личности, в сиянието на които се оглеж- дат цяла плеада последователи, възпитаници, колеги; има личности, без които животът става по беден, дните по-еднообразни, защото в сър- цето остава празно място. Такава личност е професор, доктор на педа- гогическите науки Елка Петрова – най–големият ерудит в областта на предучилищното възпита - ние, учен с международно значение. Дълги години ще свеждаме глави пред нейна- та обаятелна личност, с искрена признателност ще си спомняме свидните

МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЙ ЦЕНТР ГУМАННОЙ ПЕДАГОГИКИ

Международният център „Хуманна педагогика“ организира XIII педаго- гически четения в периода 20 – 23.03.2014 г. в гр.Тбилиси, Грузия. Форумът се организира със съдействието на грузинското правителство. „Учителят“ е темата, която ще обедини участниците: учители, експерти, родители, универ- ситетски преподаватели, представители на педагогическата общност от мно- го страни, за да се осъществи дискусия за мисията на съвременния учител в съвременния образователен контекст. Ръководството на

Книжка 1
ОСНОВНИ ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКИ НА МОБИЛНОТО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова Лъчезар Лазаров

2013 година
Книжка 9
УЧИТЕЛИ ВЪЗРОЖДЕНЦИ В ТЪРНОВО

Венка Кутева-Цветкова

Книжка 8
ДИМИТЪР ДОНЧЕВ – С ВЪЗХИТА ЗА БЪЛГАРСКИЯ УЧИТЕЛ

100 ГОДИНИ ОТ РОЖДЕНИЕТО НА ДИМИТЪР ЕВСТАТИЕВ ДОНЧЕВ (5.10.1913 – 15.02.1997)

Книжка 7
„СЛЪНЦЕТО“ НА ВЪЗПИТАТЕЛНАТА СИСТЕМА В ТВУ – РАКИТОВО

85 ГОДИНИ ОТ РОЖДЕНИЕТО НА АНГЕЛ УЗУНОВ (1928 – 1999)

ЦЕННОСТИ И ДУХОВНО-НРАВСТВЕНО РАЗВИТИЕ НА МАЛКИЯ УЧЕНИК

Марияна Ешкенази, Гергана Фиданова, Марияна Вишева, Цветанка Годжилова

МАЛКИЯТ УЧЕНИК ЧЕТЕ

Марияна Механджиева Венета Велева

С БАБА И ДЯДО В КЛАС

Цветелин Горанов, Таня Илиева, Цветанка Берова, Нели Иванова, Борка Бончева

РОД РОДА НЕ ХРАНИ, НО ТЕЖКО МУ, КОЙТО ГО НЯМА!

Диляна Вачкова Евелина Димитрова

ДА ПОМОГНЕМ НА ДЕЦАТА ДА ОТВОРЯТ СЪРЦАТА СИ

Иванка Дебелушина Нина Маврикова

ДОБРОТО Е У ВСЕКИ

Мария Наскова

ОТЛИЧЕН ПЕДАГОГ, ПСИХОЛОГ И ПСИХОТЕРАПЕВТ

ДОЦ. СВЕТОСЛАВ СТАМЕНОВ (1939 – 2013)

Книжка 6
ТЕОРЕТИКО-ПРИЛОЖНИ ПРОБЛЕМИ НА КОНСТРУИРАНЕТО НА ТЕСТ ЗА НАЦИОНАЛНО ВЪНШНО ОЦЕНЯВАНЕ ПО „ЧОВЕКЪТ И ОБЩЕСТВОТО“ ЗА 4. КЛАС (2013)

Ваня Петрова, Цонка Каснакова, Мариан Делчев Жана Минчева Радостина Стоянова, Рада Димитрова Мария Темникова

MEDIA IN PRESCHOOL AGE OF CHILD’S LIFE

Sonja Petrovska Jadranka Bocvarova

Книжка 5
ШАЛВА АЛЕКСАНДРОВИЧ АМОНАШВИЛИ – УЧИТЕЛ ОТ БЪДЕЩЕТО

В сложното битие на науката и метамор- фозите на социалната реалност, неотменими и общовалидни остават само най-стойностни- те постижения и безспорни истини, които не само маркират и остойностяват територията на човешко познание, но извисяват самия чо- век, поддържат неговата вяра в доброто, под- хранват чувството му за собствена значимост, укрепват неговия дух. Приемайки извечните послания на класи- ческата философско-педагогическа мъдрост и дълбоко обвързан с педагогическата р

МАНИФЕСТ ГУМАННОЙ ПЕДАГОГИКИ

Преамбула 25 лет тому назад группа учителей новаторов провозгласила манифест „Пе- дагогика сотрудничества“ (Переделкино, 1986 год). В последующие годы были опубликованы отчеты встреч учителей новаторов, в которых рассматри- вались разные аспекты педагогики сотрудничества: „Демократизация лично- сти“ (Цинандали, Телавский район, Грузия, 1987 год), „Методика обновления“ (Москва, 1988 год), „Войдем в новую школу“ (Краснодарский край, 1988 год). Идеи педагогики сотрудничества воодушевленно

ПОРТФОЛИОТО НА УЧЕНИКА КАТО ПРОЦЕС НА САМОПОЗНАНИЕ

Радка Топалска Емилия Вълкова, Албена Атанасова

ДОПИРНИ СВЕТОВЕ

Албена Димитрова Стилияна Гронева

ПРЕДИ ГОДИНА И СЕГА

Веселка Аршинкова

Книжка 4
СВЕЩЕНИК ГЕОРГИ МАРИНОВ ПОЛУГАНОВ – ОСНОВАТЕЛЯТ НА УЧИЛИЩЕТО И ПЪРВИЯТ УЧИТЕЛ В ПОЛИКРАЙЩЕ

Георги Георгиев Трифонка Попниколова Марияна Георгиева–Гроссе

ЕВРОПЕЙСКИ ПРИКАЗКИ

Светла Попова

Книжка 3
ДА ОПАЗИМ ДЕТСКОТО ЗДРАВЕ!

Мая Топалова, Симона Пейчева

КАК ДА ОТГЛЕДАМЕ МАЛЪК ПРИРОДОЛЮБИТЕЛ?

Мадлена Николова Ани Цветкова

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
ИЗКУСТВОТО ЗА ПРЕВЕНЦИЯ НА АГРЕСИВНОТО ПОВЕДЕНИЕ НА ДЕЦАТА

Евгения Миланова Виолета Николова Величка Радева

ПРИЯТЕЛСТВОТО В ЖИВОТА НА ДЕТЕТО

Даниела Димитрова Красимира Василева

ПРЕДАЙ НАТАТЪК

Вилдан Мехмедова

ЗАЕДНО ДА БЪДЕМ ДОБРИ

(ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКА СИТУАЦИЯ В ПОДГОТВИТЕЛНА ГРУПА)

ПРОФ. ДПН EЛКА ПЕТРОВА EДНА НЕЗАЛИЧИМА СЛЕДА В БЪЛГАРСКОТО ПРЕДУЧИЛИЩНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ (1919 – 2012)

Почина проф. дпн Елка Петрова (20.ХІІ.2012 г.) – на- шата любима учителка по изкуството да се живее пъл- ноценно и професионално, създателката на науката за предучилищното възпитание на българските деца, пре- красната жена и велика майка, Неповторима, единствена, съвършена – това е нашата Елка: Примерът за всички нас – хилядите нейни студенти и последователи ! Елка Петрова винаги е първа, винаги е оригинална и авангардна; през 1950–1952 г. поставя началото на Висшия мето

2012 година
Книжка 9
ПЕДАГОГЪТ – РИЦАР НА ДЕТСТВОТО

Януш Корчак бе написал, че животът на великите хора е като легендите: труден, но красив. И се оказва пророчески прав, сякаш е писал за себе си! Наследник на семейство с богата духовна култура и традиции, останал отрано без баща, той не просто се справя с несгодите на сирачеството, но развива у себе си три могъщи извора на живот: любов към свободата и справедливостта, страст към знанието и творчеството, отдаденост на децата и тяхното щастие. Лекарят Корчак лекува децата и душите им. Безплатн

ЯНУШ КОРЧАК – ВЕЛИК ХУМАНИСТ И ПЕДАГОГ

„Със сила и мощ поведох своя живот, който беше привидно неподреден, самотен и чужд. За син избрах идеята да служа на детето и неговото дело. Привидно загубих.“ Бе лекар, писател, мислител. Бе философ, учен, моралист. Издател. Възпи- тател и педагог. Бе герой. Бе скромен. Във всяка от тези области той има изключителни постижения. В течение на по- вече от четиридесет години работи като педагог и писател. Четиридесет години безкористно служене на слабите и беззащитните. Създава съвременна кон

ЕВОЛЮЦИЯ НА ПРАВАТА НА ДЕТЕТО

„Детето има право на сериозно отношение към проблемите му, на справедливото им решаване.“

THE KORCZAK’S RIGHT TO SOCIAL PARTICIPATION OF CHILDREN THE CITIZENSHIP OF CHILDREN

A speech by Marek Michalak, the Ombudsman for Children, given during the seminar„The Polish-Israeli pioneer in the fi eld of human rights, Janusz Korczak (1879–1942) and today’s Convention on Children’s Rights as the part of the international law“, Geneva, the 6 of June 2009

ЗА ДЕТЕТО, ДЕТСТВОТО ИЛИ НАУКА ЗА НЕГО?

В памет на Януш Корчак – по повод 70 г. от неговата смърт и 100 г. от създаването на „Дом за сираци“ във Варшава Албена Чавдарова

Книжка 8
CHANGES IN UNIVERSITY TEACHING – THE ROAD FROM KNOWLEDGE TO COMPETENCIES

Slađana Anđelković Zorica Stanisavljević Petrović

ДОСТОЕН ЖИВОТ, ОТДАДЕН НА ПРОСВЕЩЕНИЕТО… ПРОФ. СТОЙКА ЗДРАВКОВА – ЕДИН СЪВРЕМЕНЕН БУДИТЕЛ НА 70 ГОДИНИ

Неуморна и взискателна! Енергична и всеотдай- на! Работохолик и перфекционист! Това е проф. д-р Стойка Здравкова! Не е за вярване, че в началото на ноември 2012 година навърши 70 години. И не е слу- чайно това, че тази светла дата е непосредствено бли- зо до Деня на будителите. А това, че проф . Здравкова е съвременен български будител, е толкова безспорно и видимо! 70–годишнината ù е един чудесен повод ретрос- пективно да си припомним и проследим най-значи-

Книжка 7
ОЧАКВАНА И ПОЛЕЗНА

Емилия Василева

Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ЦЕННО ПОМАГАЛО ЗА ПСИХОЛОЗИ И ПЕДАГОЗИ (Надежден инструмент за диагностициране смисъла на живота)

Любен Десев Минчев, Борис. Тест на Дж. Крумбъг и Л. Махолик за смисъл в живота. Българска версия. Варна, ВСУ „Черноризец Храбър“,

ГЕОРГИ MАВРОВ ЖИВОТ, ОТДАДЕН НА НАУКАТА И ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Така най-общо, но и най-точно можем да охарак- теризираме дейността на ст. н. с. д-р Георги Петков Мавров. Той ни напусна неочаквано в края на април т.г. И до последния си ден не преставаше да се вълнува от проблемите на образованието. Споделяше инте- ресни мисли относно предстоящото приемане на За- кона за образованието. Пестелив на думи, но щедър на дела – това ясно проличава от неговата богата би- ография.

Книжка 4
ОЩЕ ЕДНА ИДЕЯ

Галина Стоянова

Книжка 3
С ИНОВАТИВЕН ПОГЛЕД КЪМ ЛИЧНОСТТА НА ДЕТЕТО

Маргарита Абрашева Любимка Габрова

БИЗНЕС ОБУЧЕНИЕ В ДЕТСКАТА ГРАДИНА

Красимира Костова Петя Драгоданова

ДЕТСКАТА БЕЗОПАСНОСТ

Любимка Габрова

БАБА ПРИКАЗКИ РАЗКАЗВА... (МИКС ОТ ПРИКАЗКИ)

Кева Захариева, Мария Мичева

Книжка 2
ДЕТЕ ПЪТУВА В АВТОМОБИЛА

Красимира Михайлова

ПРОТИВОПОСТАВЯНЕ

Пюрвя Ердниев, Б. Ердниев

ЗДРАВКА НОВАКОВА – ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛ И ТВОРЕЦ

Седемдесетгодишният юбилей е вълнуващ повод да проследим трудния, богат и съдържателен професионално-творчески път на доц. д-р Здравка Новакова, да под- чертаем нейната важна роля за утвърждаване на дидактика на математиката като

IN MEMORIAM Иван Марев

Напусна ни проф. Иван Марев – философ, педагог, демократ, родолюбец. В далечната 1975 г., зареден с енергия, пълен с идеи, той създаде в Техническия

Книжка 1
ДЕЛЕГИРАНЕ НА ПРАВА ЧРЕЗ КОМИСИИТЕ В ДЕТСКАТА ГРАДИНА

Маргарита Абрашева Политиката, наречена управление на качеството, не е самоцел, нито поредна обра- зователна „мода“. Тя е практически необходима за поддържане от директора на учеб- ното заведение на един привлекателен образ в условията на конкуренция на пазара на учебни заведения. Това се отнася най-вече за детските градини. Политиката на упра- вление на качеството съдържа недостатъчно използван ресурс, включително за спечел- ване и запазване доверието на потребителя – родителите на децата,

ИНОВАЦИОННИ И ИНТЕРАКТИВНИ МЕТОДИ В КВАЛИФИКАЦИОННАТА ДЕЙНОСТ НА ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИЯ КОЛЕКТИВ

Стоилка Ташева, Севда Лукайчева Развиващото се с динамични темпове общество в днешно време налага необ- ходимостта от иновационни промени в областта на образованието. И в предучи- лищната педагогика все по-често се търсят алтернативни педагогически техноло- гии както за възпитанието и обучението на децата, така и при провеждането на квалификационната дейност на самите педагози. Използването на интерактивните методи дава възможност да се възлагат за- дачи, които предполагат съвместна работа,

ТОВА ТРЯБВА ДА ГО ЗНАЕ ВСЯКО ДЕТЕ

Татяна Атанасова, Иванка Пампова

НА УЛИЦАТА Е ОПАСНО

Таня Янчева, Зоя Кацарова