Педагогика

https://doi.org/10.53656/ped2025-9.06

2025/9, стр. 1316 - 1335

A CASE STUDY ON UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE, ATTITUDES, AND AI USE IN COMPLETING AN ONLINE MULTI-STAGE EFL WRITING ASSIGNMENT

Blagovesta Troeva-Chalakova
OrcID: 0000-0002-8477-2053
E-mail: btroeva@nbu.bg
New Bulgarian University
Sofia Bulgaria

Резюме: The paper presents a small-scale case study on the implementation of a multi-stage writing assignment among forty-three students of English as a foreign language (EFL), enrolled in an online intermediate course. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the advantages of a combination of product- and process-oriented assessment, its benefits for students based on their performance and attitudes, as well as the unauthorized use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools during task completion. A mixed-methods approach is employed combining quantitative data from the online learning system in which the assignment is conducted with qualitative data from a student survey. The results suggest that introducing process assessment elements in writing assignments may offer greater learning value than direct product (essay) assessment. Unauthorized use of AI was not entirely prevented. It occurred among a small number of both strong and weaker students. Two online AI detection tools produced highly inconsistent results, while human judgment did not identify all cases flagged by both detectors. The analysis reveals teacher bias, with more cases detected among students who rarely attended classes compared to high-proficiency active learners. In view of reinforcing learning, the results highlight the need for further research on multi-stage assessment and the potential of a hybrid approach, in which AI use is reasonably integrated into the students’ training, following strict guidelines.

Ключови думи: English as a second language; writing assessment; essays; processbased assessment; AI-generated texts; AI use detection

Introduction

While integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in teaching offers potential benefits, its impact on student evaluation has raised significant concerns within the academic community. One of the key challenges is the growing dependence of students on AI models to generate texts. Another is the need for educators to rethink both teaching strategies and evaluation methods, when attempting to ensure academic honesty and fairness in assessment.

Essays are among the most widely used assessment tools in foreign language courses (Dikli 2003). They are flexible, allowing educators to modify questions and rubrics depending on their instructional needs (ibid). However, they also allow for easier incorporation of AI-generated content without detection, especially in online courses. Traditionally, essay grading often evaluates only the final product, providing limited insight into students’ writing process. This is a serious shortcoming as the latter consists of “the interplay of three recursive cognitive subprocesses (planning, translation, and revision) which interact with the writer’s long-term memory and the writing task or task environment” (Hiyes & Berninger 2014).

This study investigates a structured, multi-stage approach to assessment aimed at both improving writing skills and minimizing AI reliance. The participants in this small-scale study were forty-three Bulgarian university students enrolled in an online Intermediate English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) course for one semester. Most of them were high performers, with only a few experiencing difficulties with what Abbas (2017) calls common challenging areas such as language use or idea generation. They reported uncertainty regarding academic essay structure and organization, cohesion and coherence.

Addressing this need, the teacher introduced elements of the process-led approach when teaching them how to write advantages and disadvantages (A&D) academic essays. Planning received the greatest focus as it has been known to holistically improve college students’ writing scores, being comprised of at least two elements: idea generation and organization (Limpo & Olive 2021). During the training sessions, specific features of the essay structure were highlighted and practiced. Students were scaffolded in drafting and organizing ideas, paragraph structuring, and maintaining coherence and cohesion. Such a multi-stage approach aligns with Vygotsky’s concept of the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), where learners achieve higher levels of competence through guided practice and feedback. Personal feedback was given to the students on all the tasks performed. It was considered an essential part of the training as it “emphasizes a process of writing and rewriting where a text is not seen as self-contained but points forward to other texts the student will write” (Hyland 2010, p. 177). That is, it aims to help students become more independent writers.

The students’ writing skills were assessed using a four-stage task mirroring some of the practice activities and culminating in writing an A&D essay. It marked a shift from the traditional assessment of a final product of writing, the decision being driven by three main objectives. First, it responded to students’ needs, as they had reported and demonstrated strong language skills but weaker mastery of academic structuring and organization. Second, it aligned with the view that when working on different stages, students’ benefits build up as they improve not only their writing but also their cognitive skills (AlTamimi 2020; Hayles 2024). Clark even argued that “introducing students with various stages of writing will be more beneficial than highly focusing on their language structure” (2012). In addition, requiring students to develop their essays in stages was expected to eventually dissuade some students from submitting AI-generated texts. We found some support in such a proposition in August et al.’s (2024) suggestion to reduce reliance on AI tools by including tasks that require critical engagement such as documenting the writing process (e.g. through drafts, revisions, and reflections).

The research questions guiding this study were the following:

1. Did the students’ results from the essay assignment correspond to the overall performance of the students on the course?

2. What were the students’ perceptions of the adopted writing procedure?

3. Did students resort to unauthorized use of AI to generate their essays?

In answering these questions, the study tries to highlight the benefits of processbased assessment and the challenges of AI use, as there is limited evidence on whether multi-stage writing tasks can simultaneously support writing development and reduce reliance on AI tools, particularly in an online EFL context.

Literature Review

Product- and Process-Oriented Assessment

Traditionally direct assessment, carried out over a limited time, has been the dominating method of evaluating students’ written assessment (Dikli 2003, Drid 2018). Drid (2018) defines direct assessment of writing, also known as “on-demand or impromptu writing” (Wolcott & Legg 1998, p. 10), as an approach in which students are required to create a complete text following a specific framework. It is often associated with the so-called product-based writing, where teachers predominantly evaluate the final product of students’ work, even though “the methodology of teaching ESL writing has shifted toward process-based approaches over the last two decades” (Lee 2006, p. 307). Although this method allows for a faster and direct evaluation of writing skills, it does not manage to register the cognitive processes taking part in the creation of a text (Weigle 2002). It also is not very informative about the extent to which students have mastered the different processes involved in writing a coherent and meaningful piece. And although it was considered that unlike portfolio assessments, “questions of authorship or of collaboration do not arise” as “the writing is done under the instructor’s eye” (Wolcott & Legg 1998, p. 25), this is no longer the case, particularly in online ESL courses.

Contemporary discussions have highlighted the benefits of process-based assessment, reflecting the idea that writing is “a series of recursive stages entailing deliberate goals and choices on the part of the individual” (Flower & Hayes 1981). “Process” is meant to be “discovery in which ideas are generated and not just transcribed as writers think through and organize their ideas before writing and revising their drafts” (Lee 2006, p. 307). The most effective teaching of writing is divided into different stages aiming to support systematically the development of skills needed (Sun & Feng 2009). Assessing in the process-oriented approach per se includes work on several stages of the writing process and involves polishing with the help of peer and teacher conferencing (Montague 1995).

In their meta-analysis of 115 writing intervention papers, Graham & Perin (2007) confirm that there is a statistically significant improvement in the quality of students’ writing when students’ writing process is scaffolded and supported. This includes instruction on how to use specific text structures, what strategies they need to apply, how to regulate them, and how to meet specific writing objectives. Similarly, Vega and Pinzon (2019) show that applying a process-based approach through guiding students through the various stages, such as planning, monitoring and self-evaluation, improve the text’s content, organization and vocabulary, as well as students’ confidence about writing in English. Lee (2006) finds out that processoriented essay writing, including submission and peer discussion of drafts, leads to increased length, more complex sentences, increased holistic and analytic scores. Murray’s (1972) thought that “instead of teaching finished writing, we should teach unfinished writing, and glory in its unfinishedness” highlights the value of working on various levels and aspects of the text before we reach excellency.

One effective way to account for the development of students’writing skills, while gaining insight into the processes involved, is through formative assessment tools such as portfolio assessment. It, however, does not fulfill the needs for a more controlled and concentrated process assessment (Lee 2006). Process-oriented assessment usually involves peer feedback and assessment, which in some circumstances, as in end-of-semester final tests, is not a likely part of the evaluation procedure. Another type, which we employed and explored in our experiment, is multi-stage essay writing. As it only partially responds to the characteristics of a process-oriented assignment, it could be more appropriate to describe it as “adaptations to direct assessment” (Wolcott & Legg 1998 p. 26) employing both elements of process and product writing. The term refers to prewriting strategies, which allow for preparations of the students about the topic and revisions of the draft within a timed period. The shortcomings of this approach lie in the limited possibilities for revising higher-order elements such as organization and development (Wolcott & Legg 1998 p. 26).

AI in EFL Writing Improvement

In the last few years, an increasing body of research has focused on the beneficial use of AI tools in the classroom. An improvement in writing scores via the help of tools like Grammarly, ChatGPT and Quillbot is reported in Dja’far and Hamidah (2024). Gültekin Talayhan and Babayiğit (2023) specifically investigate how AI tools enhance content development and text organization in EFL writing, identifying improvements in generation of ideas, vocabulary, and coherence. August et al. (2024) highlight various types of AI assistance, including brainstorming, spellchecking, and reference formatting. Pratama and Hastuti (2024) find significant improvements in EFL students’ descriptive texts due to AI provision of personalized feedback, while Joo (2024) discusses both the opportunities and weaknesses of such feedback. The use of ChatGPT has been shown to enhance ESL learning and ease teachers’ administrative workload in Chinese context (Hung and Chen 2023). Klenbort (2023) compares it to past technological shifts and views it as an educational tool carrying considerable potential.

Challenges of AI in Academic Integrity

While AI tools offer significant benefits for EFL writing, their use also raises important ethical and practical challenges. Issues such as dishonesty, plagiarism, over-reliance on AI, and the challenges of detecting AI-generated texts have been reported in Mohammadkarimi (2023), Khalil and Er (2023), Vasilatos et al. (2023), etc. The problem in educational institutions is further complicated as many universities lack specific policy guidelines on AI use, and it is up to the instructors to determine what constitutes dishonest practices in the courses they lead (Caulfield 2023a in August 2024, p. 189). In the context of ESL teaching, using spell-checking tools may not be considered a violation, whereas submitting a fully AI-generated text seriously hinders students from learning (August et al. 2024). August et al. (2024, p. 191) stress that educators must establish clear guidelines for themselves and their students on how AI tools align with learning objectives.

An increasing number of scholars warn against dangers of decline of critical thinking (Gültekin Talayhan & Babayiğit 2023, August et al. 2024). The authors of the last two studies advocate for a balanced approach to AI use by educators and learners, and present a framework for developing guidelines for AI use in students’ writings. It has been emphasized that AI tools need to be supporting and not leading the learning process (Godwin-Jones 2022).

AI tools can write human-like essays, and combinations of human and AI-generated texts are getting harder to detect (Yan et al. 2024). The discourse goes beyond the notion of plagiarizing, which Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary (n.d.) defines as stealing and passing off (the ideas or words of another) as one’s own or using (another’s production) without crediting the source. AI-generated texts are different in that they are impossible to compare to an original version, which makes the concept of “plagiarism” ambiguous (Vynck 2023).

While teachers can be trained to identify better such interference, still the outcome is not up to the level that can be desired, and we can expect the models to mimic better human writing styles in the nearest future (Yan et al. 2023). Detection is further hampered as “while a badly organized essay with many spelling mistakes is almost certainly human-written, a well-written, well-organized essay is not almost certainly AI-generated” (Yan et al. 2023). Besides, AI tools have demonstrated inconsistencies. For example, during a professional training session, a text about the university’s mission written twenty years ago was incorrectly flagged as AI-generated (76%) by one of the popular AI-use detectors1.

Pedagogical Responses to AI Use

The discourse on fairness of assessment has led to a shift in the way we think about the reasons for evaluating students’ knowledge, needs or achievements, and the way this is done. Voices arise in favour of an overall shift in the assessment methods by turning to in-class writing and/or oral presentations (Klenbort 2023; Hung & Chen 2023). The latter emphasizes the need to instruct students how to critically evaluate AI-generated content. Mohammadkarimi (2023) suggests strategies to address AI-driven academic dishonesty, such as incorporating problemsolving activities, using plagiarism detection tools, and encouraging students to express their own ideas.

Regarding ESL courses, especially those in an online format, some of the Mohammadkarami’s (2023) solutions do not work perfectly. Excellent performance in speaking would not automatically correlate to excellency in writing. Also, in many cases, online ESL courses provide no options for in-class examinations. Critically evaluating AI-generated content is an essential skill that must be taught and acquired in any field of knowledge; however its application is limited when writing tasks require non-factual personal accounts and sharing of opinions. Plagiarism detection software fails to identify AI-generated content, while AI-detection tools are still unreliable, as pointed out earlier.

Problem-solving activities and tracking the development of a piece of writing through different stages seem to be some of the logical approaches to a fairer student assessment. While existing research highlights the benefits of process-based assessment and the challenges of AI use, there is limited evidence on whether multi-stage writing tasks can simultaneously support writing development and reduce reliance on AI tools, particularly in online EFL context.

Research Method and Educational Context

The participants in the case-study were 43 students (aged 19-34; 26 women, 17 men) from New Bulgarian University enrolled in an online Intermediate (B1.2.) EFL course – Council of Europe, 2001, in the fall semester of 2024. They belonged to two different course groups (n1=23 and n2=20), and presented a convenience sample, based on the students’ attendance on the days assigned for testing.

To carry out the present study, a mixed-method approach was employed. Quantitative data about the students’ grades and times of completing the tasks were extracted from the learning management system Moodle, in which the assignment was carried out. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics (Mean, Median, and SD). Additionally, a post-assignment survey measured the students’ perceptions of the multi-stage writing process, which were both statistically and thematically analyzed (Appendix).

A methodological challenge was the lack of AI-detection system within the Moodle platform, requiring the teacher to rely on her own judgement and external AI-detection tools. Another challenge was that not all students who had enrolled in the course and completed the assignment had attended it or took part in subsequent sessions and exams. This resulted in not having all of them complete the survey and not having a basis for comparison regarding their overall English skills.

The traditional way of testing students’ written skills at this level had been through an essay task in which they selected one of two given topics, usually in the form of an A&D essay. The written works had normally been asynchronically submitted online. Prior to implementing the new format, most students underwent a two-session training of how to write A&D essays. It included video materials demonstrating the requirements of the type, focusing on structure, content and cohesion; direct instruction from the teacher; and guided practice into writing paragraphs with a special focus on topic sentences, developing argumentation, and using cohesive devices. These learning objectives were highlighted as the major skills that were going to be evaluated on assessment day. Three of the practice tasks mirrored what was going to be required in the written assignment. The assignment was divided into four sequential stages:

Task 1. Brainstorming. In the first stage the students had to generate ideas on their chosen topic, the instructions requiring students to write only words and phrases rather than complete sentences at this stage. A word limit of 50 words was set.

Task 2. Writing an outline. At the next stage students needed to make an outline of their essay by choosing three advantages and three disadvantages from their brainstormed list, and add supporting details or examples about each (a model was provided as a reference). A limit of 100 words was set.

Task 3. Paragraph development. At this stage the students were asked to write the advantages paragraph, highlighting the topic sentence and linking words and phrases they had used, demonstrating their understanding of paragraph structure. Again, they had a limit of 100 words.

Task 4. Essay Writing. At the last stage the students needed to write their complete essay of about 180 – 230 words, incorporating the previously written advantages paragraph, modeling the disadvantages one on it, and adding an introduction and conclusion.

A major limitation in effectively implementing the task was the university’s Moodle version, which lacked the functionality to prevent students from completing tasks out of sequence (i.e., finishing a task before completing the preceding ones). This potentially increased the risk of some students not following the order of the tasks given.

Details about students’ performance including the scores per task, the overall time and chronology of each task’s completion were extracted from the Moodle test platform. Students also completed a survey a week after the test, answering questions about different parameters of the task and their attitudes about the format of the multi-stage assignment.

Results

The results below are presented in relation to each of the study’s research questions.

1. Did the students’ results from the essay assignment correspond to the overall performance of the students on the course?

The results of the students were considerably high (Fig.1), which was expected as most of them had demonstrated high proficiency in English during the course. The rubric assigned equal weight to the following five assessment components: a) structure and organization, b) grammar, c) vocabulary, d) coherence and cohesion, e) argumentation. The learning objectives of the writing training session (a and d) were satisfactorily attained in most of the written works.

Basic statistics was performed with the help of an online statistics service2 (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Histogram of the students’ scores in a 6-grade scale system

The Mean (4.77) and Median (5.50) scores indicate that most students performed well. The data reflects their strong language skills and effectively structured writing process. The high grades are likely due to the students’ higher actual levels, as many had chosen to enroll at the minimum required exit level. The SD (1.42) suggests that the poor grades are rather outliers and do not reflect the typical performance of the two groups of B1.2. students. Students with very low scores (0 – 7 points) were predominantly those who did not complete the four stages of the task and/or submitted essays flagged as AI-generated.

As writing an A&D essay was the only graded assignment of its kind, the students’ achievement was studied in the context of their performance throughout the course. The analysis studied the differences between a) students’ grades on the essay assignment, b) their grades on the final written test, and c) their course final grade (Figure 2). The final written test included writing a piece in response to a question and was less structured than a), whereas the final grade was composed of 5 elements, with the oral presentation (the only face-to-face, students’ cameras-on event) having the highest impact because of the online nature of the course.

Figure 2. Comparison of student performance across three assessments (in a 6-grade scale system)

Nine students received 0-7 points, which equaled a poor grade (or 2). All of these were identified by the teacher as having submitted AI-generated texts for their own. Six were students who had not attended the course, of whom five did not do any other test, did not attend the examination session, and did not receive a final course grade. Three of the nine students attended the course, irregularly. One of them was a low-achievement student, two had average-to-good skills. All these students were offered a second chance to write an essay, which was used only by the two latter students, who subsequently received good grades.

Coinciding essay assignment and final test grades (Table 1) were very common (50% of 28 students who had a final test grade). Cases with lower essay grade and higher final test grade with a difference of 0.5 were only 10.71%, while those with higher written assignment grade and lower final grade with a difference of 0.5 made up 25%. The final test included tasks on various skills, only one of which was writing a composition. The fact that 92.86% of students had only minimal differences (no or 0.5 difference) between the two grades confirms that the essay performance of the students was not much different from their achievements in a multiple-component final test.

Table 1. Differences between grades on the essay assignment and the written test grade.

Difference between essay grade (a) and final test grade (b)(n=28)Number ofstudents%same grade (a=b)1450%0.5 up (a<b)310.71%0.5 down (a>b)725%1 up (a<b)27.14%1 down (a>b)27.14%

When compared to the overall course grade (Table 2), the analysis revealed that 90.32% of the cases showed either no or only a minimal difference (0.5 grade), with 38.71% of the grades being identical. More students scored higher on the overall grade, which is possibly due to some of its components, such as grades on speaking and participation. However, only 3 students received a grade that was 1 level higher, and no students had a difference of more than 1 grade.

Table 2. Differences between grades on the essay assignment and the final overall grade

Difference between essay assignment grade (a) and finaloverall grade (c) (n=31)Numberof students%same grade (a=c)1238.710.5 up (a<c)929.030.5 down (a>c)722.581 up (a<c)39.681 down (a>c)00

In answer to our first research question, we found that in most cases the grades on the A&D multi-stage assignment did not significantly differ from the overall performance of the students during the course. In addition, there was a close correspondence between the high values of the grades and the high proficiency of the students throughout the course. Low or zero values will receive special attention in the discussion of the third research question.

2. What were the students’ perceptions of the adopted writing procedure?

Students’ attitudes towards the four-stage assignment were studied by means of a survey, which tapped into their experience of both the training and the assignment tasks. The information was gathered from 37 of the 43 students, as it was voluntary, and not all students attended classes on the following week.

Some students did not answer some of the questions, therefore, some results are reported in numbers.

Most students (25/37) had attended the training on how to write A&D essays. Among those who missed it, most (10/12) reported they had reviewed the training materials available on Moodle. 30/37 students considered the training useful, seven did not answer this question. Most (35/37) reported an increased confidence in their abilities to write a similar type of essay in the future. Such responses confirmed that the content of the training had addressed areas which the students found challenging and assisted them in improving their writing skills.

We had a particular interest in finding out how the students looked at the major change introduced – the breaking of the writing process into four stages. Most (27/37) found it helpful. They appreciated that it helped them structure their essays (26/37), recall the necessary components (25/37), and refine their ideas (24/37). There was a small number who found this approach inconvenient, as it either slowed them down (6/37), or did not match their personal logic for structuring the essay (5/37).

Regarding the first task (brainstorming) and the second task (writing an outline), the students’ overall attitude was positive with approval ratings of respectively 7/10 and 8/10. Task 3, which was writing an advantages paragraph, combined with highlighting the topic sentence and linking devices, was also rated with 7/10.

When asked in an open question what they would change in the writing procedure, a significant number (14/37) explicitly stated that they would not change anything. However, some students suggested reducing the number of steps (4/37), writing the entire essay all at once (3/37), or just the opposite – adding stages for the other parts of the essay (2/37), and focusing more on the draft before finalizing their work (2/37).

The survey provided insight into the extent to which students accepted the new evaluation method and identified some strengths and weaknesses, which will be discussed below and addressed in future assignment planning.

3. Did students resort to unauthorized use of AI to generate their essays?

We performed four types of analyses to identify AI-assisted writing: a) on the overall time of completion, b) on the chronology of completing the different stages, c) on the content, and d) on students’ direct responses.

The time taken to complete the essay by the nine students who scored 0-7 points had Mean=42.05 min, Median=43.27 min, and SD=16.29 min. This contrasts sharply with the time invested by the other 34 students (12-22 points), whose data showed Mean=88.10 min, Median: 82 min, and SD=36.22 min.

Figure 3. Essay Completion time by score group

The time that the lower-scoring students took was approximately half of the time needed by the others (Fig. 3). That might mean that they rushed through the tasks (some of them skipped some of the stages). The smaller SD also means that there was not much variability in the time they took. It could also mean potential reliance on AI tools to generate their essays quickly, which led to consistent completion times. The longer completion time of the stronger students (12 – 22 points) shows that they invested more effort working on the four stages of the assignment. Their SD is more variable, which reflects natural tendencies for students to work at different pace while completing a task.

The second insightful piece of data was Moodle’s periodical time saving reports. We found that at least 3 students had pasted the completed essay in the final task soon after the task was accessible and then extracted from it the pieces needed for the previous tasks, working backwards. These were students who had not attended the training, probably did not know how to approach the tasks, and possibly used AI assistance. As students who had attended the training did not act in this way, this finding highlights the importance of detailed, step-by-step manner training in the skill of writing.

The cases flagged by the teacher as probably AI-generated stood out due to their native-like proficiency and fluency, sophisticated vocabulary, and intricate grammar. The structure closely followed the one given in the instructions. Seven out of the nine students were unknown to the teacher, and she had no other data about their command of English. In their case, resorting to AI assistance could be because of uncertainty and lack of sufficient knowledge and skills in writing. In one case, the student had very low proficiency and was a close passer, completing the course with a fair grade. In two other cases, the students were good performers, availed themselves of the opportunity to write the essay a second time, and received very good grades. This proved to us that use of AI in writing texts is seen both in students with low performance and lack of skills to do the tasks by themselves, as well as by students with higher language proficiency.

After the test was manually assessed by the instructor, an AI detection tool (“ZeroGPT”3) was used to detect assisted writing of the final stage of the essay. A probability of over 75% was considered a positive one. The online tool detected 16 essays possibly generated by AI, 12 of them having 100%, one 96.93%, one 94.57%, one 87.77%, one 76.78% probability. Out of the rest, 16 essays were judged to have been written with 0% of AI assistance, and 11 essays with a probability between 9.14% and 61.52%.

Taking into consideration the unreliability of some AI detection tools, we employed a second test and ran all the essays through the platform “justdone.ai”4. This even complicated our findings as the discrepancies between the two AI detectors turned out to be substantial, probably due to differences in their training datasets or underlying algorithms (Fig. 4). We received doubtful results, e.g. 100% of essays being detected as AI-generated. Fourteen of them had been flagged as 0% AI-generated by the first detector, the latter coinciding with the teachers’ own perception of the texts’ originality. Our solution was to flag as AI-generated only those essays which showed more than 75% probability in both detectors’ analyses. These coincided with the 16 essays identified by the first AI detector.

Figure 4. Comparison of the results of the two AI detecting tools

Comparing the positive identification by both the teachers and the online tools, we found a certain discrepancy (Table 3).

Table 3. Cases of AI-generated texts identified by the teacher compared to those identified by AI-detection tools

Did the teacher identifyAIuse?Studentswho attended thecourseStudentswho did not attendthe courseYes27No72

Most cases which the human assessor identified in agreement with the AIdetecting tool were of students who had not been attending the course and therefore were unknown to the instructor. In contrast, the teacher failed to detect many of the cases when AI assistance was used by students who were known to the teacher. This data might mean that lack of detection was linked to the overall good impression of the instructor from the students’ performance in class, which led to overlooking the signs of AI interference in their work.

When students had to self-report on their use of AI in the process of writing, most of the students who answered this question (26/33 or 84%) denied using it, with only 2 admitting using it to generate ideas rather than copying content directly, and 3 reporting use of Google translate (Figure 5). Nevertheless, when the teacher offered the students with points 0-7 to do the assignment a second time, giving feedback on the unauthorized use of AI tools, none of them objected to the feedback on each task, including results from the AI detector.

Figure 5. Students’ responses to the question if they used AI to write their essay

Discussion

In this study we explored the introduction of a four-stage process of writing an A&D essay as a graded assignment in terms of its benefits to students’ writing development, as well as their behaviour related to AI unauthorized use in the fulfillment of the assignment.

As the participants were mostly higher proficiency EFL students, it was expected that most of them would excel in this graded assignment. Therefore, the focus of the preparatory training lay on the areas of difficulty students themselves had put forward: organization and structure, and included comprehensive work on topic sentences, argumentation, coherence and cohesion. The training tasks mirrored the format of the written examination students were going to complete, aiding both their performance and their confidence-building.

Most students found the training useful and effective, and most of them approved of the switch to a less product-based and more process-based writing task as part of their assessment. The majority felt more confident in being able to write a similar type of essay in the future, and said they were reminded of the important structures they would otherwise forget about.

The students’ scores aligned with other grades they received during the course, which means that this type of task did not cause devaluation of students’ knowledge and abilities. However, some areas could be fine-tuned to accommodate different learning preferences and cognitive styles. First, while breaking the essay writing into stages worked well for most, a minority of students preferred a more fluid approach. If an option was given to either follow the staged method, if they needed structured help, or write more freely, especially if they were highly skilled writers, their different learning styles and capabilities could have been addressed better. Second, the value of each stage could be reconsidered as well. Timed brainstorming exercises could be done in class before the test, so that all students could collaborate to generate ideas, and use them under less pressure in their writing. Such an approach would have helped students who experience difficulties to generate ideas, hindering their writing process, as suggested by Kartikasari (2023).

Writing the advantages paragraph first was meant to address a common problem area - students’ difficulty forming topic sentences, proper argumentation and paragraph coherence. Pinpointing some of these elements was thought to guide the students into writing properly structured main body of the essay. Students who had done a similar activity in class were made conscious of why this approach is beneficial, but those who had not might have missed to perceive its value. Significantly, those who tried to skip the initial phrases turned out to be the students who had skipped the training.

Use of AI was not avoided. A very small number of students skipped the first stages, pasted an AI-generated text into the last slot and then inserted parts of it to complete the previous steps. We found that these were students who had not done the training, therefore were not aware of the strategies involved in writing an A&D essay. Probably, these were also students who had poor knowledge of English, which could not be confirmed as these students did not take part in the rest of the course. There was a possible AI reliance among a small number of strong students as well, as two of the students with an alleged use of AI and consequently low scores, made avail of the second opportunity of writing the essay and performed very well.

Detection of AI was made difficult by the fact that the two AI-detectors used produced considerably different results. Therefore, the instructor put greater trust in her own identification of AI-generated texts, being aware of possible misjudgment. Yan et al. claim that “humans rarely perform better than random guessing (60-65%) when asked to identify texts generated by modern Ais” (2023, p. 126, quoting Clark et al. 2021 and Ippolito et al. 2020). When evaluating non-scientific data such as language use in EFL classes, we might expect the percentage will be at least similar if not higher. In this study, the assumed threshold of over 75% probability coincidence in both AI-generated text detectors confirmed and coincided with the human evaluation, with the exception of a few cases the teacher had possibly missed. An important finding of the study was that lack of personal knowledge of the students increases the chances of a teacher identifying their work as AI generated. Therefore, teachers need to be aware of all personal biases in their attempt to provide fair assessment, in addition to being given specialized training to identify AI-generated texts.

We also recommend that, to ensure fairness, AI detectors should not be the only method of identifying academic dishonesty. The cautious flagging of students’ works was informed by research which found that false positives are more common among texts written by non-native speakers than by native speakers (Jiang et al. 2024). Liang (et al. 2023) used several AI use detectors to analyse the essays of non-native speakers’ taking the TOEFL examination. More than half the essays were wrongly identified as AI-generated versus classifying 90% of the essays of US native speakers as human-authored. Liang et al. (2023) explain this by the role of perplexity or complexity of vocabulary used. August et al. go as far as to claim that it “is not possible to identify with certainty whether a student used GenAI” (2004, p. 189).

Based on our findings, we could highlight several pedagogical recommendations. The writing process can be made more transparent and reduce AI misuse in graded assignments if they include drafting stages. Implementing students’ reflection, e.g. on topic sentences as parts of the required paragraph structure, ensures the assessment helps students reinforce their knowledge and skills. Teachers should train students in responsible AI. Since some students are already using AI for writing support, addressing its appropriate use in academic settings could help clarify its benefits and limitations. This should be preferably done at the very beginning of each language course. Universities should develop clear AI-assistance policies, especially regarding its use in coursework.

It is important to note that several limitations exist in the present study, one of them being the limited number of participants. Secondly, it would have yielded more precise information about the extent to which multi-stage assignments reduce the probability of students using AI tools, if more instances of them doing the same type of assignment were recorded and researched over time. A third drawback of the assignment processing was that students were not informed of their work going through an AI detecting tool. Future implementations should ensure transparency by informing students of AI detection procedures. They should also have the right to appeal against an AI use claim on their work. Four, there is not a 100% certainty if the unauthorized use of AI really took place, so we can rather talk about high probability. And finally, some of the students’ development over the course could not be observed for lack of attendance.

Conclusion

As AI technology evolves, educators must strike a balance between leveraging AI’s benefits and ensuring fair, transparent, and ethical assessment practices – a task quite demanding, especially in online courses. We found that changing the format of a written assignment from product-to process-based carried important learning potential but did not dissuade some online EFL students from submitting AI-generated work. In our study, however, those were a very small percentage and were mostly students who had not regularly attended the course and the writing training. Monitoring the writing development over time helps the teacher to assess their students’ genuine progress. If assignments are not split into stages as in the present one, students may be asked to submit process logs (e.g. drafts or revisions) to prove their authorship. Future research should explore the opportunities for writing development through hybrid approaches that integrate students’ original texts with AI-assisted feedback. As Hayles (2024) points out students need to “develop critical relationship with algorithmic cultures and to transparently show their contributions versus what the AI contributed”. Further efforts should focus on the learning objectives and devising assignments in view of students achieving targeted skills, alongside improving teachers’ capacities for AI-use detection, and investing time in educating students in responsible use of AI assistance.

NOTES

1. Personal archives.

2. Easy Histogram Maker is available at https://www.socscistatistics.com/descriptive/histograms/default.aspx

3. ZeroGPT detector is available at www.zerogpt.com

4. Justdone.ai detector is available at https://justdone.com/

REFERENCES

ABBAS, M. F.F., 2017. Assessing and Evaluating EFL learners’ Ability in Writing Academic Essay. ISELT, vol. 5, pp. 257 – 261.

ALEXANDER, K.; SAVVIDOU, CH.; ALEXANDER, Ch., 2023. Who Wrote This Essay? Detecting AI-Generated Writing in Second Language Education in Higher Education. Teaching English with Technology, vol. 2.

AL-KHULAIDI, M. A. & ABDULKHALEK, M. M., 2022. Academic Writing Problems in L2 Settings: Realities and Need for Intervention. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 42 – 51.

ALTAMIMI, R., 2020. Beliefs and Practices of Teaching Writing by Teachers of English as Foreign Language: The Case of Context Impact. Bulletin of the Faculty of Languages and Translation, Al-Azhar University, vol. 25, pp. 196 – 220.

AMIRJALILI, F.; NEYSANI, M. & NIKBAKHT, A., 2024. Exploring the Boundaries of Authorship: A Comparative Analysis of AI-Generated Text and Human Academic Writing in English Literature. Frontiers in Education, vol. 9.

AUGUST, E. T.; ANDERSON, O. S. & LAUBEPIN, F. A., 2024. Brave New words: A Framework and Process for Developing Technology-Use Guidelines for Student Writing. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 187 – 196.

COTTON, D. R. E.; COTTON, P. A., & Shipway, J. R., 2024. Chatting and Cheating: Ensuring Academic Integrity in the Era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 228 – 239.

DJA’FAR, V. H. & HAMIDAH, F. N., 2024. The Effectiveness of AI technology in Improving Academic English Writing Skills in Higher Education. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 579 – 593.

DIKLI, S., 2003. Assessment at Distance: Traditional vs. Alternative Assessments. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 2, no. 3, 13 – 19.

DRID, T., 2018. The Fundamentals of Assessing EFL Writing. Developing Psycho-Educational Practices Lab, pp. 292 – 305.

GRAHAM, S. & PERIN, D., 2007. A Meta-Analysis of Writing Instruction for Adolescent Students. Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 445 – 476.

GÜLTEKIN TALAYHAN, Ö. & BABAYIĞIT, M. V., 2023. The Influence of AI Writing Tools on the Content and Organization of Students’ Writing: A Focus on EFL Instructors’ Perceptions. Journal of Current Debates in Social Sciences, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 83 – 93.

HYLAND, K., 2010. Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.

HAYLES, N. K., 2024. Don’t Ban AI from your Writing Classroom; Require It! Poetics Today, vol. 45, no. 2, рр. 59 – 265.

HUNG, J. & CHEN, J., 2023. The Benefits, Risks and Regulation of Using ChatGPT in Chinese Academia: A Content Analysis. Social Sciences, vol. 12, no. 380.

JOO, S.H., 2024. Generative AI as Writing or Speaking Partners in L2 Learning: Implications for Learning-Oriented Assessments. Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL at Teachers College, Columbia University, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 54 – 59.

KARIMI, E., 2023. Teachers’ Reflections on Academic Dishonesty in EFL Students’ Writings in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, vol. 6, no. 2.

KARTIKASARI, P., 2023. Implementing Product and Process Writing Approach on ESP Course for Freshmen at University. Jurnal Linguistik Terapan, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1 – 6.

KHALIL, M., & Er, E., 2023. Will ChatGPT Get You Caught? Rethinking of plagiarism detection.

KLENBORT, S., 2023. Does ChatGPT Have a Place in the Classroom? Eureka Street, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 29 – 31.

LEE, Y.J., 2006. The Process-Oriented ESL Writing Assessment: Promises and Challenges. Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 307 – 330.

LIANG, W.; YUKSEKGONUL M.; Mao Y., Wu E.; Zou J., 2023. GPT Detectors are Biased Against Non-Native English Writers. Patterns (NY), vol. 4, no. 7.

LIMPO, T. & Olive, T., 2021. Executive Functions and Writing. Oxford University Press.

KARIMI, E., 2023. Teachers’ Reflections on Academic Dishonesty in EFL Students’ Writings in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, vol. 6, no. 2.

MONTAGUE, N., 1995. The Process Oriented Approach to Teaching Writing to Second Language Learners. New York State Association for Bilingual Education Journal, vol. 10, pp. 1 – 13.

PRATAMA, R. M. D., & HASTUTI, D. P., 2024. The Use of Artificial Intelligence to Improve EFL Students’ Writing Skill. English Learning Innovation (Englie), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 13 – 25.

VASILATOS, C. ; ALAM, M. ; RAHWAN, T. ; ZAKI, Y. & MANIATAKOS, M., 2023. HowkGPT: Investigating the Detection of ChatGPT – Generated University Student Homework through Context-Aware Perplexity Analysis.

VEGA, L.F.S.; PINZON, M.M.L., 2019. The Effect of the Process-Based Approach on the Writing Skills of Bilingual Elementary Students. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 72 – 98.

WEIGLE, S. C., 2002. Assessing Writing. Cambridge University Press.

WOLCOTT, W. & LEGG, S. M., 1988. An Overview of Writing Assessment: Theory, Research, and Practice. Urbana, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Illinois.

YAN, D.; FAUSS, M.; HAO, J. & CUI, W., 2023. Detection of AI-Generated Essays in Writing Assessments. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 125 – 144.

2025 година
Книжка 9s
Книжка 9
DEVELOPMENT OF DEMOCRATIC CULTURE THROUGH CONTENTS ABOUT THE ROMA IN CLASSROOM TEACHING – STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION

Aleksandra Trbojević, Biljana Jeremić, Hadži Živorad Milenović, Bojan Lazić

Книжка 8
КАТЕГОРИАЛНИ ИЗМЕРЕНИЯ НА ИНФОРМАЦИОННО-КОМУНИКАЦИОННИТЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ СЪС СОП

д.п.н Мира Цветкова-Арсова, Данка Щерева, Славина Лозанова, Маргарита Томова

Книжка 7
ВРЪЗКА НА СОЦИАЛНО-ЕМОЦИОНАЛНОТО С КОГНИТИВНОТО РАЗВИТИЕ В ПРИОБЩАВАЩА СРЕДА

Милен Замфиров, Маргарита Бакрачева, Емилия Евгениева

Книжка 6
КОГНИТИВНО РАЗВИТИЕ НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ, ОБХВАНАТИ В ПРИОБЩАВАЩОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Милен Замфиров, Емилия Евгениева, Маргарита Бакрачева

Книжка 5
COMPETENCE FOR SOCIAL PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICE: WHAT DO STUDENTS TELL US?

Maya Tcholakova, Marina Pironkova, Aleksandar Ranev, Yana Staneva

MULTIMODAL COMMUNICATION IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION CLASSES

Cristiana Lucretia Pop, Cristina Filip

Книжка 4s
GAMES IN FUNCTION OF DEVELOPMENT OF MULTIPLICATION SKILLS

Dasare Sylejmani, Vesna Makashevska, Jasmina Jovanovska

Книжка 4
ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА СИСТЕМИТЕ ЗА УПРАВЛЕНИЕ НА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО В КОНТЕКСТА НА ИНТЕРАКТИВНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Силвия Парушева, Борис Банков, Гергана Касабова, Петя Страшимирова

MILITARY AND SOCIAL THREATS AS DETERMINANTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONTEMPORARY UKRAINIAN HIGHER EDUCATION

Mykola Pantiuk, Tetiana Pantiuk, Nataliia Bakhmat, Olena Nevmerzhytska, Svitlana Ivakh

STEM ОБУЧЕНИЕ НА СТУДЕНТИ ПЕДАГОЗИ В ТРАНСДИСЦИПЛИНАРНА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА СРЕДА

Любен Витанов, Николай Цанев, Людмила Зафирова, Гергана Христова, Катерина Динкова, Калина Георгиева, Жорж Кюшев, Здравка Савчева

ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ И АНАЛИЗ НА НАГЛАСИТЕ НА СТУДЕНТИТЕ ПРИ ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА ГЕНЕРАТИВЕН ИНСТРУМЕНТ НА ИЗКУСТВЕН ИНТЕЛЕКТ

Николай Янев, Иглика Гетова, Теодора Христова, Ива Костадинова, Георги Димитров

Книжка 3
ДРУГИЯТ КАТО ЦЕННОСТ В УЧИЛИЩЕ

Александър Кръстев

Книжка 2
ASSESSMENTS OF TEACHERS AND PARENTS OF CHILDREN WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ON INCLUSION IN PRE-SCHOOL INSTITUTIONS

Zagorka Markov, Hadzi Zivorad Milenovic, Biljana Jeremic, Radmila Zecevic, Milica Pavlovic

Книжка 1s
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА СРЕДСТВАТА ЗА ДОПЪЛВАЩА И АЛТЕРНАТИВНА КОМУНИКАЦИЯ В ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИТЕ ИНСТИТУЦИИ В БЪЛГАРИЯ

. Неда Балканска, . Анна Трошева-Асенова, . Пенка Шапкова, Снежина Михайлова

USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING

Ekaterina Sofronieva, Christina Beleva, Galina Georgieva

Книжка 1
Скъпи читатели, автори, приятели на списание „Педагогика“,

В началото на 2025 година в първия брой на нашето списание „Педагогика“ бих искала от името на редакционната колегия и от мое име да Ви пожелая здраве, творческо вдъхновение и професионално удовлетворение от прино- са Ви към педагогическата наука и практика! Вярвам и се надявам, че списание „Педагоги- ка“ ще продължи да осигурява платформа за научен, обективен и откровен диалог, базиран на резултати от научни изследвания, за насто- ящето и бъдещето на обучението и образова- н

2024 година
Книжка 9s
Книжка 9
ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT OF VIDEO LEARNING RESOURCES IN SMALL-SCALE LEARNING SCENARIOS

César Córcoles, Laia Blasco-Soplon, Germán Cobo Rodríguez, Ana-Elena Guerrero-Roldán

Книжка 8
АНГАЖИРАНОСТ КЪМ УЧЕНЕ ЧРЕЗ ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА СМАРТ ТЕХНОЛОГИИТЕ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Кирилка Тагарева, Дора Левтерова-Гаджалова, Ваня Сивакова

Книжка 7
Книжка 6
Книжка 5s
ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВАТА НА СТАЖАНТСКАТА ПРАКТИКА ПРЕД СТУДЕНТИ – БЪДЕЩИ УЧИТЕЛИ

Илиана Петкова, Марияна Илиева, Владислава Станоева, Георги Чавдаров

Книжка 5
FEATURES OF SPEECH COMPREHENSION TRAINING OF CHILDREN WITH AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS

Maryna Branytska, Svitlana Myronova, Svitlana Mykhalska

OVERVIEW OF THE STEM EDUCATION IN ISRAEL

Aharon Goldreich, Elena Karashtranova

Книжка 4
НАГЛАСИ НА СТУДЕНТИТЕ КЪМ СМАРТ ТЕХНОЛОГИИТЕ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Дора Левтерова-Гаджалова, Кирилка Тагарева, Ваня Сивакова

PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT FOR YOUNG RESEARCHERS

Emina Vukašinović, Marija Veselinović, Milan Milikić

РОБОТИТЕ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО – ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА STEAM ИГРА

Мария Желязкова, Михаил Кожухаров, Даниела Кожухарова

Книжка 3s
Книжка 3
ATTITUDES AND EXPERIENCES OF THE PRESCHOOL TEACHERS IN THE APPLICATION OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION

Nataša Branković, Gordana Kozoderović, Biljana Jeremić, Danijela Petrović, Bojan Lazić, Slavica Karanović

ДИГИТАЛНИ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ПОДКРЕПА НА УЧЕНЕТО

Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова, Лъчезар Лазаров

PREPARATION OF FUTURE TEACHERS FOR ORGANISING A HEALTH-PRESERVING INCLUSIVE SPACE IN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

Nadiya Skotna, Tetiana Nadimyanova, Anna Fedorovych, Myroslava Sosiak, Oksana Yatsiv

Книжка 2s
Книжка 2
ОТ РИСУНКА – КЪМ СНИМКА

Камен Теофилов

Книжка 1s
Книжка 1
„ВТОРОТО“ БЪЛГАРСКО УЧИЛИЩЕ. ГЕНЕЗИСЪТ

Пенка Цонева, Бистра Мизова

2023 година
Книжка 9
EXPLORING THE NARRATIVE IDENTITY OF HUNGARIAN TEACHERS IN SLOVAKIA

Patrik Baka, Terézia Stredl, Kinga Horváth, Zsuzsanna Huszár, Melinda Nagy, Péter Tóth, András Németh

Книжка 8
A QUALITY “ONLINE” TEACHER – WHAT DO STUDENTS APPRECIATE AND VALUE IN TEACHERS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING?

Irena Golubović-Ilić, Ivana Ćirković-Miladinović, Nataša Vukićević

SUPPORT FOR THE INCLUSION OF ROMA CHILDREN THROUGH THE PROJECT TEACHING MODEL

Biljana Jeremić, Aleksandra Trbojević, Bojan Lazić, Gordana Kozoderović

TREND ANALYSIS OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCES OF SPORTS TEACHERS AND COACHES

Sergejs Capulis, Valerijs Dombrovskis, Svetlana Guseva, Alona Korniseva

Книжка 7
ЦЕННОСТЕН ПРОФИЛ НА УЧИТЕЛИТЕ В НАЦИОНАЛЕН КОНТЕКСТ

Цветан Давидков, Силвия Цветанска

Книжка 6s
MODELLING OF MARITIME CYBER SECURITY EDUCATION AND TRAINING

Gizem Kayisoglu, Pelin Bolat, Emre Duzenli

INTRODUCING THE USE OF CASE STUDIES METHODOLOGY IN TRAINING FOR SOFT SKILLS IN MARITIME UNIVERSITIES. THE ISOL-MET PROGRAM

Maria Lekakou, Helen Iakovaki, Dimitris Vintzilaios, Markella Gota, Giorgos Georgoulis, Thalia Vintzilaiou

THE ROLE OF MARITIME EDUCATION IN DIGITALIZATION

Kamelia Narleva, Yana Gancheva

Книжка 6
С МИСИЯ ЗА НАЦИОНАЛНА И КУЛТУРНА ИНДИВИДУАЛНОСТ

Надежда Кръстева, Йордан Колев

Книжка 5s
PREFACE

Nikola Vaptsarov Naval Academy is the oldest technical educational institution in Bulgaria. The Naval Academy is one of the symbols of Varna and Bulgaria in the world maritime community. Its history and achievements establish it as the most prestigious center for training of maritime specialists. At present, the Naval Academy trains specialists for the Navy and for the merchant marine in all areas of maritime life. Research and development conducted at the Naval Academy in Varna

A FAIR CONCERN ABOUT ECDIS

Nikolay Sozonov, Dilyan Dimitranov

DATA-DRIVEN LEARNING APPROACH TO MARITIME ENGLISH

Jana Kegalj, Mirjana Borucinsky, Sandra Tominac Coslovich

DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS THROUGH THE “CASE STUDY” TEACHING METHOD IN MARITIME ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING (MELT)

Tamila Mikeladze, Svetlana Rodinadze, Zurab Bezhanovi, Kristine Zarbazoia, Medea Abashidze, Kristine Iakobadze

MAXIMIZING STUDENTS’ LEARNING IN MARITIME ENGLISH ONLINE COURSE

Valentyna Kudryavtseva, Svitlana Barsuk, Olena Frolova

Книжка 5
Книжка 4s
Книжка 4
Книжка 3s
СПИРАЛАТА ОБЩЕСТВО – ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Иванка Шивачева-Пинеда

Книжка 3
ПРОЕКТНО БАЗИРАНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ ЗА СОЦИАЛНО-ЕМОЦИОНАЛНИ И ТЕХНОЛОГИЧНИ УМЕНИЯ ЧРЕЗ ПРОГРАМАТА „УМЕНИЯ ЗА ИНОВАЦИИ“

Галин Цоков, Александър Ангелов, Йоанна Минчева, Рени Димова, Мария Цакова

МЕДИЙНАТА ГРАМОТНОСТ И УЧИТЕЛИТЕ

Светла Цанкова, Стела Ангова, Мария Николова, Иван Вълчанов, Илия Вълков, Георги Минев

Книжка 2
INTONATION AND CHILDREN WITH EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL PROBLEMS

Katerina Zlatkova-Doncheva, Vladislav Marinov

Книжка 1
2022 година
Книжка 9
ТРАНСГРЕСИВНО-СИНЕРГИЧНО КАРИЕРНО РАЗВИТИЕ В „НЕФОРМАЛНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ“ В УНИВЕРСИТЕТА

д.п.н Яна Рашева-Мерджанова, Моника Богданова, Илиана Петкова

Книжка 8
INTEGRATING INTERCULTURAL EDUCATION IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOL CURRICULUM

Bujar Adili, Sonja Petrovska, Gzim Xhambazi

НАГЛАСИ НА БЪДЕЩИТЕ ДЕТСКИ УЧИТЕЛИ КЪМ STEM ПОДХОДА

Наталия Павлова, Михаела Тончева

Книжка 7
НАЦИОНАЛНАТА ИДЕЯ НА ПАИСИЙ ХИЛЕНДАРСКИ

Йордан Колев, Надежда Кръстева

Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ИВАН Д. ШИШМАНОВ – ЕВРОПЕИЗИРАНИЯТ БЪЛГАРИН

Надежда Кръстева, Йордан Колев

THE TECHNOLOGY OF DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNICATIVE CULTURE OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS

Mariia Oliiar, Nataliia Blahun, Halyna Bilavych, Nataliia Bakhmat, Tetyana Pantyuk

Книжка 4
TEACHERS’ATTITUDES BOUT TEACHING AND LEARNING MATHEMATICS

Aleksandra Mihajlović, Emina Kopas-Vukašinović, Vladimir Stanojević

EDUCATION 4.0 – THE CHANGE OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE LABOUR MARKET

Gergana Dimitrova, Blaga Madzhurova, Stefan Raychev, Dobrinka Stoyanova

Книжка 3s
DISTANCE LEARNING IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMICS

Baktybek Keldibekov, Shailoobek Karagulov

DIGITAL UNIVERSITIES: FEATURES AND KEY CHARACTERISTICS

Marina Skiba, Maktagali Bektemessov, Alma Turganbayeva

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
TWO-TIER MODEL OF TRAINING FUTURE TEACHERS FOR COACHING AT OUT-OF-SCHOOL INSTITUTIONS

Borys Savchuk, Tetyana Pantyuk, Natalia Sultanova, Halyna Bilavych, Mykola Pantyuk

Книжка 1
2021 година
Книжка 9
ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЕТО МЕЖДУ ФОРМАЛНОТО И НЕФОРМАЛНОТО ЗДРАВНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Доц. д-р Вержиния Боянова Гл. ас. д-р Константин Теодосиев Гл. ас. д-р Берджухи Йорданова

FORMATION OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE OF ASSISTANT TEACHER OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN SECONDARY EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

Prof. Dr. Vladyslava Liubarets, Prof. Dr. Nataliia Bakhmat, Prof. Dr. Olena Matviienko, Oksana Tsykhmeistruk, Inna Feltsan

Книжка 8
ОТНОСНО ЗАДЪЛЖИТЕЛНОСТТА НА ПРЕДУЧИЛИЩНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ – РЕЗУЛТАТИ ОТ ЕДНО ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ

Проф. д-р Маргарита Колева, доц. д-р Блага Джорова, д-р Ева Жечева

INFLUENCE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PEDAGOGICAL FEATURES OF STUDENTS ON THEIR ACTIVITY IN SELF-EDUCATION

Dr. Iryna Sereda, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Svitlana Karskanova, Assoc. Prof.

CENTRALISATION AND DECENTRALISATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HUNGARY AND GERMANY

Carla Liege Rodrigues Pimenta, Prof. Dr. Zolt†n R–nay, Prof. Dr. Andr†s Nmet

ЗА ПРИОБЩАВАНЕТО, ОБУЧЕНИЕТО И РАЗВИТИЕТО НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ С ИНТЕЛЕКТУАЛНИ ЗАТРУДНЕНИЯ

Златкова-Дончева, К. (2021). Приобщаване, обучение и развитие на деца и ученици с интелектуални затруднения. Бургас: Либра СКОРП, ISBN 978-954-471-705-6

Книжка 7s
CONCEPT OF PRESENT PRACTICE IN CHOOSING OF OPTIMAL NUMBER OF TUGS

Rino Bošnjak, Zvonimir Lušić , Filip Bojić, Dario Medić

S-101 CHARTS, DATABASE TABLES FOR S-101 CHARTS, AUTONOMOUS VESSEL

Vladimir Brozović, Danko Kezić, Rino Bošnjak, Filip Bojić

INFLUENCE OF HYDRO-METEOROLOGICAL ELEMENTS ON THE SHIP MANOEUVRING IN THE CITY PORT OF SPLIT

Zvonimir Lušić , Nenad Leder, Danijel Pušić, Rino Bošnjak

MEETING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS – EXPERIENCE FROM THE LARGEST SHIPPING COMPANIES

Katarina Balić , Helena Ukić Boljat, Gorana Jelić Mrčelić, Merica Slišković

OPTIMISING THE REFERENCE POINT WITHIN A JOURNAL BEARING USING LASER ALIGNMENT

Ty Aaron Smith , Guixin Fan , Natalia Nikolova , Kiril Tenekedjiev

REVIEW OF THE CURRENT INCREASE OF NOISE UNIT COST VALUES IN TRANSPORT

Luka Vukić , Ivan Peronja , Mihaela Bukljaš , Alen Jugović

TARGET DETECTION FOR VISUAL COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM

Miro Petković, Danko Kezić, Igor Vujović, Ivan Pavić

NEW RESULTS FOR TEACHING SHIP HANDLING USING FAST TIME SIMULATION

Knud Benedict , MichŽle Schaub , Michael Baldauf , Michael Gluch , Matthias Kirchhoff , Caspar Krüger

POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF ELECTRICALY DRIVEN FERRY, CASE STUDY

Tina Perić, Ladislav Stazić, Karlo Bratić

SITUATIONAL AWARENESS – KEY SAFETY FACTOR FOR THE OFFICER OF THE WATCH

Hrvoje Jaram, Pero Vidan, Srđan Vukša, Ivan Pavić

Книжка 7
INCLUSIVE INTELLIGENCE

Dr. Aleksandar Krastev, Assist. Prof.

EDUCATION OF MORAL CULTURE OF STUDENT YOUTH IN THE CONDITIONS OF POLYCULTURAL SPACE

Dr. Natalia Bondarenko, Assoc. Prof. Yevhen Rozdymakha Dr. Lyudmila Oderiy, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Anatoly Rozdymakha, Assoc. Prof. Dilyana Arsova, PhD student

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN KOSOVO – RESEARCH OF TRAINING PROGRAMS AND TESTS

Bekim Samadraxha, Veton Alihajdari, Besim Mustafa, Ramë Likaj

Книжка 6s
EVALUATION OF CRUISER TRAFFIC VARIABLES IN SEAPORTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA

Maja Račić, Katarina Balić, Mira Pavlinović, Antonija Mišura

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CONTRACTS FOR MARITIME TRANSPORT SERVICES. CHAIN OF CHARTER PARTIES

Svetlana Dimitrakieva, Ognyan Kostadinov, Christiana Atanasova

THE LIGHTSHIP MASS CALCULATION MODEL OF A MERCHANT SHIP BY EMPIRICAL METHODS

Vedran Slapničar , Katarina Zadro , Viktor Ložar , Ivo Ćatipović

ON EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN MARITIME COMMUNICATIONS AND THE GMDSS DURING THE COVID-19

Chavdar Alexandrov, Grozdyu Grozev, Georgi Dimitrov, Avgustin Hristov

AIR POLLUTANT EMISSION MEASUREMENT

Nikola Račić, Branko Lalić, Ivan Komar, Frane Vidović, Ladislav Stazić

ASSESSMENT OF LNG BUNKERING ACCIDENTS

Peter Vidmar, Andrej Androjna

EGR OPERATION INFLUENCE ON THE MARINE ENGINE EFFICIENCY

Delyan Hristov, Ivan Ivanov, Dimitar Popov

THE MEASUREMENT OF EXHAUST GAS EMISSIONS BY TESTO 350 MARITIME – EXHAUST GAS ANALYZER

Bruna Bacalja, Maja Krčum, Tomislav Peša, Marko Zubčić

PROPELLER LOAD MODELLING IN THE CALCULATIONS OF MARINE SHAFTING TORSIONAL VIBRATIONS

Nenad Vulić, Karlo Bratić, Branko Lalić, Ladislav Stazić

MODELING OF THE DEPENDENCE OF CO

Hristo Hristov, Ivailo Bakalov, Bogdan Shopov, Dobromir Yovkov

TECHNICAL DIAGNOSTICS OF MARINE EQUIPMENT WITH PSEUDO-DISCRETE FEATURES

Guixin Fan , Natalia Nikolova , Ty Smith , Kiril Tenekedjiev

CONTRIBUTION TO THE REDUCTION OF THE SHIP’S SWITCHBOARD BY APPLYING SENSOR TECHNOLOGY

Nediljko Kaštelan, Marko Zubčić, Maja Krčum, Miro Petković

THE STAND FOR FIN DRIVES ENERGY TESTING

Andrzej Grządziela , Marcin Kluczyk , Tomislav Batur

INTRODUCTION OF 3D PRINTING INTO MARINE ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION – A CASE STUDY

Ivica Kuzmanić, Igor Vujović, Zlatan Kulenović, Miro Petković

SHIPYARD CRANE MODELING METHODS

Pawel Piskur, Piotr Szymak, Bartosz Larzewski

Книжка 6
TEACHERS' PERSPECTIVE ON THE EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF ONLINE TEACHING

Dr. Julien-Ferencz Kiss, Prof. Dr. Florica Orțan, Dr. Laurențiu Mˆndrea

ПСИХОЛОГО-ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ ПРАВИЛА, МОДЕЛИ НА ДОБРИ ПРАКТИКИ И ПРЕПОРЪКИ ПРИ РАБОТАТА И ОБУЧЕНИЕТО НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ С ПОВЕДЕНЧЕСКИ РАЗСТРОЙСТВА

Тричков, Ив., 2019. Психолого-педагогически правила, модели на добри прак- тики и препоръки при работата и обучението на деца и ученици

Книжка 5
ФИДАНА ДАСКАЛОВА ЗА ПЕДАГОГИКАТА

Маргарита Колева, Йордан Колев

ВОЕННОМОРСКОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ – ЕДИН РАЗЛИЧЕН ПОГЛЕД

Кожухаров, А. (2021). Личните академични документи на българската военна образователна система (1892 – 1946). Варна: ВВМУ, ISBN 978-619-7428-55-1

Книжка 4
Книжка 3
НЕВРОДИДАКТИКА

Наталия Витанова

ЗА АСИСТИРАЩИТЕ И ИНФОРМАЦИОННИТЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Сивакова, В. (2020). Асистиращи и информационни технологии

Книжка 2
ОВЛАДЯВАНЕ НА КЛЮЧОВИ КОМПЕТЕНЦИИ ПРИ ОРИЕНТИРАНЕ В СВЕТА

Стоянова, М. (2019). Овладяване на ключови компетенции при ориентиране в света. София: Авангард принт, ISBN 978-954-337-398-7 374

Книжка 1
BULGARIAN SCHOOL – SHOWCASE OF IDENTITY

Veska Gyuviyska, Nikolay Tsankov

ЗА ИЗБОРА НА УЧЕБЕН КОМПЛЕКТ ПО БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕЗИК И ЛИТЕРАТУРА В НАЧАЛЕН ЕТАП. И ЗА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО

Георгиева, А. (2020). Съвременни проекции на обучението по български език

КОНТРОЛ НА СТРЕСА. ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКИ И УПРАВЛЕНСКИ РАКУРСИ

Стоянов, В. (2020). Управление на стреса в организацията. Психологически и управленски ракурси. 198 cтр., Варна: Стено, ISBN 978-619-241-119-0

2020 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
EDUCATIONAL REASONS FOR EARLY SCHOOL DROP-OUT

Maria Teneva, Zlatka Zhelyazkova

Книжка 7s
TEACHING CHALLENGES IN SPORTS EDUCATION DURING THE PANDEMIC COVID-19

Evelina Savcheva, Galina Domuschieva-Rogleva

THE DIFFERENCES IN STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES ABOUT ONLINE TEACHING DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Aleksić Veljković Aleksandra , Slađana Stanković , Irena Golubović-Ilić , Katarina Herodek

ONLINE EDUCATION DURING PANDEMIC, ACCORDING TO STUDENTS FROM TWO BULGARIAN UNIVERSITIES

Antoaneta Getova¹ , Eleonora Mileva² , Boryana Angelova-Igova²

Книжка 7
ПОДГОТОВКАТА НА ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ КАДРИ ЗА ПРЕДУЧИЛИЩНИТЕ ВЪЗПИТАТЕЛНИ ЗАВЕДЕНИЯ ПРЕЗ ПЕРИОДА 1944 – 1991 ГОДИНА

Въчева, С. (2019). Подготовката на педагогически кадри за предучилищните възпитателни заведения през периода

ПАЗАРНИ МЕХАНИЗМИ В УЧИЛИЩНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ. ТЕОРЕТИКО-ПРИЛОЖНИ ВЪПРОСИ

Първанова, Й. (2020) Пазарни механизми в училищното образование. Теоретико-приложни въпроси. София: Колбис, ISBN 978-619-7284-35-5

Книжка 6
TEACHERS ATTITUDES ABOUT INTEGRATED APPROACH IN TEACHING

Emina Kopas-Vukašinović, Aleksandra Mihajlović, Olivera Cekić-Jovanović

Книжка 5
КОНЦЕПТУАЛНИ МОДЕЛИ ЗА РАЗРАБОТВАНЕ НА ПОЗНАВАТЕЛНИ ОНЛАЙН ИГРИ В ОБЛАСТТА НА КУЛТУРНОТО НАСЛЕДСТВО

Детелин Лучев, Десислава Панева-Мариновa, Радослав Павлов Гита Сенка Лилия Павлова

ТАЛАНТЛИВ ПЕДАГОГ И КУЛТУРЕН ДЕЕЦ

Севда Чобанова, Любен Десев

Книжка 4
A CONTINUUM OF APPROACHES TO SCHOOL INSPECTIONS: CASES FROM EUROPE

Rossitsa Simeonova, Yonka Parvanova Martin Brown, Sarah Gardezi, Joe O’Hara, Gerry McNamara Laura del Castillo Blanco Zacharoula Kechri, Eleni Beniata

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2019 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НА БЪДЕЩЕТО

Наталия Витанова

Книжка 7
МОДЕЛ НА РАБОТА В ИНТЕРКУЛТУРНА СРЕДА

(Научноизследователска саморефлексия)

RISK FACTORS FOR EARLY SCHOOL LEAVING IN BULGARIA

Elena Lavrentsova, Petar Valkov

ПРИНОСИ НА ЕЛКА ПЕТРОВА ЗА БЪЛГАРСКОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

(100 години от рождението на проф. д.п.н. Елка Петрова – 27.10.1919 – 21.12.2012)

НАСОКИ ЗА ПРИОБЩАВАНЕ НА МАРГИНАЛНИ СЕМЕЙНИ ОБЩНОСТИ В ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИТЕ ИНСТИТУЦИИ

Нунев, Й. (2019). Насоки за приобщаване на маргинални семейни общности в образователните институции. Велико Търново: Св. св. Кирил и Методий, ISBN 978-619-208-186-7

Книжка 6
ДИОФАНТОВИ УРАВНЕНИЯ И СИСТЕМИ ДИОФАНТОВИ УРАВНЕНИЯ – ТЕОРЕТИЧНИ АСПЕКТИ И МЕТОДИЧЕСКА ПРОЕКЦИЯ В НАЧАЛНИЯ ЕТАП НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Владимира Ангелова. (2018). Диофантови уравнения и системи диофантови уравнения – теоретични аспекти и методическа проекция в начален етап на образование. Пловдив: Паисий Хилендарски, ISBN 978-619-202-394-2

ЕДНА НОВА КНИГА ЗА ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИТЕ УМЕНИЯ НА УЧИТЕЛИТЕ

Николай Колишев. (2018). Теория на педагогическите умения на учителите. София: Захарий Стоянов, ISBN: 9789540912066

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА ИЗСЛЕДОВАТЕЛСКИЯ ПОДХОД ПРИ ОБУЧЕНИЕ НА СТУДЕНТИ ПЕДАГОЗИ

(върху примера на обучение по академичната дисциплина „Съвременни аспекти на гражданското образование“ на студенти педагози)

LEARNING MATURITY

Alina G“mbuță Daniela-Carmen Berințan Marijana Mikulandra Krzysztof Kij Katja Sivka

Книжка 2
ДЕТЕТО И ПЕДАГОГИКАТА

Рашева-Мерджанова, Ян., Петкова, Ил. & Господинов, Вл. (съст.). (2018). Детето и педагогиката. София: Просвета, ISBN 978-954-01-3806-0

Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ КОЛЕГИ,

Редакционната колегия на списание „Педаго- гика“ ви честити Новата 2019 година! Пожела- ваме ви от сърце тя да бъде щастлива, успешна и благословена! През отминалата юбилейна 2018 г. публику- вахме редица стойностни материали на универ- ситетски преподаватели, учители, разнородни специалисти, работещи в сферата на образова- нието, докторанти. Отбелязани бяха поредица от тематични конференции и юбилейни празни- ци. Получихме и международно признание чрез включването на списанието

УЧЕНИЧЕСКО САМОУПРАВЛЕНИЕ

Желязкова-Тея, Т. & Банчева, М. (2018). Ученическото самоуправление. София: Аз-буки. ISBN: 978-619-7065-20-6

2018 година
Книжка 9
ПРАВАТА НА ДЕТЕТО ПРЕЗ ПОГЛЕДА НА СТУДЕНТИ ПЕДАГОЗИ

Йорданка Николова, Даниела Рачева

Книжка 8
СПОДЕЛЕНО МНЕНИЕ

Николова, М. & Михалева, Б. (2018). С увереност срещу агресията и кон-

Книжка 7
РАДОСТТА ОТ ОБЩУВАНЕТО НА ЧУЖД ЕЗИК В ДЕТСТВОТО

Екатерина Софрониева, Христина Белева

НОВО ТЕОРЕТИКО-ПРАКТИЧЕСКО ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА ДЕТСКОТО ТВОРЧЕСТВО

Енгелс-Критидис, Р. (2018). Децата и творчеството. Юбилеен сборник в чест

ПРОФ. Д-Р ЕЛЕНА РУСИНОВА-БАХУДЕЙЛА

Розалина Енгелс-Критидис

Книжка 6
ПОЗИТИВНА УЧЕБНА СРЕДА

Валентина Шарланова

SENIOR CITIZENS’ EXISTENTIAL NEEDS AND EDUCATION FOR THE MEANING OF LIFE

Joanna Łukasik, Norbert Pikuła, Katarzyna Jagielska

Книжка 5
ПЛАНОМЕРНО ПСИХИЧЕСКО РАЗВИТИЕ

(По случай 115 г. от рождението на П.Я. Галперин)

ПАРАДИГМАТА СЕМИОТИКА – ЕЗИК – ДЕТЕ ПРИ 6 – 7-ГОДИШНИТЕ

Жоржетина Атанасова, Любимка Габрова

ПАРАРОДИТЕЛСКАТА ГРИЖА ВЪВ ФОКУСА НА ЕДИН СОЦИАЛНОПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ АНАЛИЗ

Ковачка, Ю. (2017). Социалнопедагогически проблеми при деца с парародителска грижа. Благоевград: УИ „Неофит Рилски“, 144 стр. ISBN: 9789540001340

Книжка 4
ДЕТСКИ КОНФЕРЕНЦИИ

Боряна Иванова

СТЕРЕОТИПИЗАЦИЯ НА ЕТНИЧЕСКИТЕ ВЗАИМООТНОШЕНИЯ ПРИ СЪВРЕМЕННИТЕ МЛАДИ БЪЛГАРИ

Зорница Ганева. (2017). Стереотипизация на етническите взаимоотношения при съвременните млади българи. София: Елестра. ISBN 978-619-7292-03-9

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
СЪВРЕМЕННИ МЕТАМОРФОЗИ НА ВЗАИМООТНОШЕНИЯТА В ДЕТСКАТА ГРУПА

Веселина Иванова, Виолета Кърцелянска-Станчева

SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES AS SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS

Emilj Sulejmani Shikjerije Sulejmani

ОТНОСНО УСЕТА ЗА БРОЕНЕ

Петър Петров, Мима Трифонова

Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ КОЛЕГИ И ПРИЯТЕЛИ,

Редакционната колегия на сп.„Педагогика“ Ви честити Новата 2018 г. Пожелаваме ви тя да бъде здрава, щедра и благословена! Тази година списанието чества своя юбилей – 90 години от неговото публикуване за първи път през 1928 г. с името „Народна просвета“. От деня на създаване до сега, то отразява актуал- ните проблеми на педагогическата наука и прак- тика и остава верен спътник на хиляди научни работници, учители, докторанти. Вярваме, че силата на творческата ни енергия ще пом

ДОБРИ ПРАКТИКИ „ПАРТНЬОРСТВО РОДИТЕЛИ – УЧИЛИЩЕ“

Мехмед Имамов, Калинка Гайтанинчева

2017 година
Книжка 9
ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКОТО УЧЕНИЕ НА Й. ФР. ХЕРБАРТ – ИСТОРИЯ И СЪВРЕМЕННОСТ

(По повод 240 г. от неговото рождение) Невена Филипова

Книжка 8
ЧЕТЯЩИЯТ СТУДЕНТ, ЧЕТЯЩОТО ДЕТЕ – ЕДНО МАЛКО ПРОЗОРЧЕ, ЕДНА ВЕЛИЧЕСТВЕНА ГЛЕДКА

Мариана Мандева, Боряна Туцева, Габриела Николова, Цветелина Ковачева

Книжка 7
ДИДАКТИЧЕСКИ КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТИ

Нели Митева, Наталия Витанова

Илияна Кунева

Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ИЗСЛЕДОВАТЕЛСКО ОБУЧЕНИЕ В АКАДЕМИЧНА СРЕДА

(Научно-теоретична рефлексия) Румяна Неминска

ПРИНОС В ПСИХОЛОГИЯТА НА ТВОРЧЕСТВОТО

(120 години от рождението на Лев Семьонович Виготски) Любен Десев

ЛЕВ СEМЬОНОВИЧ ВИГОТСКИ – ПСИХОЛОГ И НА ХХI ВЕК

(по случай 120 години от рождението му)

ИСКУССТВО В ЖИЗНИ ЛЮДЕЙ

Гульнар Омарова

НОВА И ПОЛЕЗНА КНИГА

Йонка Първанова

ПРИНОСЕН ТРУД КЪМ МЕТОДИКАТА НА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО ПО БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕЗИК И ЛИТЕРАТУРА В НАЧАЛНОТО УЧИЛИЩЕ

М. Мандева (2017). Методика на обучението по български език и литература – I – IV клас. Начално ограмотяване. В. Търново: УИ „Св. св. Кирил и Методий“, 120 стр.

ЕДНО ФУНДАМЕНТАЛНО ИНТЕГРАЛНО ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА РОЛЯТА НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО ЗА РАЗВИТИЕТО НА НООСФЕРНИЯ ИНТЕЛЕКТ

Марга Георгиева, Сава Гроздев. (2016). Морфодинамиката за развитието на ноосферния интелект. София: Изток-Запад, ISBN 978-619-152-869-1

Книжка 4
Книжка 3
СИСТЕМАТИЧНО ВЪВЕДЕНИЕ В ОБЩАТА И ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКАТА СИНЕРГЕТИКА

Любен Десев (2015). Синергетика. Въведение и речник. 777 термина. София: ИК „Екопрогрес“. 464 с. ISBN 978-954-2970-37-8

Книжка 2
ПРОБЛЕМИ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВИ В РАЗВИТИЕТО НА ХУДОЖЕСТВЕНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ У НАС ПРЕЗ ПОГЛЕДА НА ДЕТСКИЯ И НАЧАЛНИЯ УЧИТЕЛ

Теодора Власева, Даниела Гирджева-Валачева, Мария Калоферова, Найден Младенов, Илияна Шотлекова

ЗАКЪСНЯЛО ПРИЗНАНИЕ

Доц. д-р Емилия Николова

Книжка 1
ФАКТОРИ ЗА УСПЕШНО ПРИЛАГАНЕ НА СМЕСЕНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова Лъчезар Лазаров

ЗА СТОПЛЕНИТЕ ПЪТЕКИ КЪМ ЛИТЕРАТУРНОТО ПОЗНАНИЕ

Радев, Радослав. 2015. Технология на методите в обучението по литература. Варна: Славена, 247 с., ISBN 978-619-190-041-1

2016 година
Книжка 9
ИНТЕРАКТИВНИ ТЕХНИКИ ЗА ОВЛАДЯВАНЕ НА ЧЕТЕНЕТО В МУЛТИКУЛТУРНАТА КЛАСНА СТАЯ – ПЪРВИ КЛАС

ФОРМИРАНЕ НА РЕЧЕВА КУЛТУРА, В НАЧАЛНА УЧИЛИЩНА ВЪЗРАСТ, (АНАЛИЗ НА АНКЕТА С УЧИТЕЛИ

Кампания

на Института за български език – БАН, и вестник „Аз-буки“

Книжка 8
Книжка 7
IBM SPSS STATISTICS ПРЕЗ ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИЯ ПОГЛЕД НА ДОЦ. Д-Р ЗОРНИЦА ГАНЕВА

Зорница Ганева (2016). Да преоткрием статистиката с IBM SPSS Statistics. София: Елестра. 712 стр. ISBN 978-619-7292-01-5

НАЧАЛНОТО ОГРАМОТЯВАНЕ – „КЛЮЧ“ ЗА УСПЕШЕН ЖИВОТ В ПРОМЕНЯЩИЯ СЕ СВЯТ

Мариана Мандева, Диляна Гаджева (2016). Начално ограмотяване

ОТ „ЧУДНА И ДИВНА ДАСКАЛЕТИНКА“ ДО ПЕДАГОГИКА ЗА НАЦИОНАЛНО СЛУЧВАНЕ

Виолета Атанасова (2015) Петко Славейков за образованието. Шумен: Унивeрситетско издателство „Епископ Константин Преславски. 208 с. ISBN 978-619-201-051-5

Книжка 6
УЧИЛИЩЕ ЗА ЧЕТЕНЕ

Петя Георгиева

Кампания

на Института за български език – БАН, и в. „Аз Буки“

ДОШЛА ЛИ Е ИНСПЕКТОРЪТ?

Ванина Сумрова

ЩЕ ТЕ ЧАКАМ В/НА ЦЕНТЪРА

Илияна Гаравалова

ПРАВО В ДЕСЕТКАТА

Ивелина Стоянова

ПРОФ.Д.П.Н. СТОЯНКА ЖЕКОВА

Редколегия на сп. „Педагогика“

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
СИНЕРГЕТИКА – НОВО НАУЧНО ПОЗНАНИЕ

(Синергетика – въведение и речник, София: ИК Екопрогрес, 2015 г.)

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
НОВА ДИНАМИЧНА МОДИФИКАЦИЯ В ГРАНИЦИТЕ НА „АЗ-КОНЦЕПЦИЯТА“ НА МАТЕМАТИЧЕСКОТО МОДЕЛИРАНЕ

Марга Георгиева & Сава Гроздев. (2015). Морфодинамиката за развитието на ноосферния интелект, София: Марга Георгиева. 323 стр. ISBN 9786199052204

Книжка 1
IN MEMORIAM

На 10.12.2015 г. ни напусна нашият колега и приятел проф. д-р Иван Пет ков Иванов. Той беше уважаван учен и експерт в областта на педагогическите науки – автор на 10 монографии, 8 учебника, 10 учебни помагала, 6 студии и над 100 статии в специализирани периодич- ни издания и научни сборници; участник в 28 между- народни и национални проекта; председател и член на експертни групи към НАОА, член на редакционната ко- легия на сп. „Педагогика“. Проф. д-р Иван Иванов беше уважаван и оби

2015 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
РУСЕНСКИЯТ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ

Златоживка Здравкова

Книжка 7
ДИСКУСИЯТА В УРОКА ПО ЛИТЕРАТУРА

Огняна Георгиева-Тенева

Книжка 6
УЧИТЕЛЯТ ПРАВИ УЧИЛИЩЕТО

ЕЗИКОВАТА ГРАМОТНОСТ НА МАЛКИЯ УЧЕНИК – „КЛЮЧ“ ЗА ОТГОВОРЕН И УСПЕШЕН ЖИВОТ В ПРОМЕНЯЩИЯ СЕ СВЯТ

ГОТОВНОСТ ЗА ОГРАМОТЯВАНЕ

Екатерина Чернева

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЕ МЕЖДУ ИСТОРИЯ, АКАДЕМИЗЪМ И РЕАЛНИ ПРАКТИКИ В СОЦИАЛНОПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКАТА ДЕЙНОСТ

Академични полета на социалната педагогика, съставител: проф. д.п.н. Клавдия Сапунджиева, научна редакция: проф. дпн Клавдия Сапунджиева, проф. д-р Нели Бояджиева, гл. ас. д-р Марина Пиронкова,

НОВА КНИГА

Клавдия Сапунджиева

Книжка 2
ПРОБЛЕМИ НА СОЦИАЛНАТА АДАПТАЦИЯ НА ПЪТУВАЩИ УЧЕНИЦИ ОТ МАЛКИ НАСЕЛЕНИ МЕСТА1)

Траян Попкочев, Бонка Гергинова, Тереза Карамангалова

Турнир по канадска борба [Arm Wrestling Competition] / Д. Евтимова,

Д. Евтимова, Е. Павлова, И. Радославова и Б. Иванов

Книжка 1
ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: THEORY AND REALITY

Inna Leonidovna Fedotenko

ОТЗИВ ЗА КНИГАТА „ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЕН ДИЗАЙН (КОНЦЕПТУАЛНИ ОСНОВАНИЯ И ПРАКТИЧЕСКИ РЕШЕНИЯ)“

Димова, Д. (2013). Образователен дизайн (концептуални основания

2014 година
Книжка 9
„СОФИЯ – УЧЕЩ СЕ ГРАД“ – МОБИЛЕН СЕМИНАР В ПОДКРЕПА НА НЕФОРМАЛНОТО УЧЕНЕ И ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ В ОБЩНОСТТА

ПЕТЪР ДЪНОВ (БЕИНСÀ ДУНÒ Е И БЕЛЕЖИТ, ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ МИСЛИТЕЛ-ХУМАНИСТ, (ПО ПОВОД НА 0-ГОДИШНИНАТА ОТ РОЖДЕНИЕТО, И 70 ГОДИНИ ОТ КОНЧИНАТА МУ

НА УЧИЛИЩЕ – С УСМИВКА!

Снежана Якимова

НА УЧИЛИЩЕ – С УСМИВКА!

Снежана Якимова

УЧИТЕЛЯТ – ЕТАЛОН ЗА ФОРМИРАНЕ НА ДЕТСКАТА ЛИЧНОСТ

Катя Коруджийска, Янка Маринкова

Книжка 8
Книжка 7
ЗАЕДНО МОЖЕМ ПОВЕЧЕ

Диана Смиленова

Книжка 6
УСПЕШНИЯТ УЧИТЕЛ – МЕЖДУ ПРОФЕСИОНАЛНАТА НОРМА И СТРАСТТА ДА ПРЕПОДАВАШ

Проф. д-р Ангел Петров е преподавател по методика на обучението по български език в СУ „Св. Климент Охридски“. Ръководител е на най- старата катедра по методика на филологически- те дисциплини в страната – Катедрата по ме-

Книжка 5
ВЪЗГЛЕДИТЕ НА ЖАН-ЖАК РУСО И ЛЮБЕН КАРАВЕЛОВ ЗА ВЪЗПИТАНИЕТО

Посвещава се на 180-ата годишнина от рождението на Любен Каравелов (1834 – 1879) Виолета Атанасова

LE PROJET PÉDAGOGIQUE, SOURCE DE MOTIVATION DANS L’ENSEIGNEMENT ET L’APPRENTISSAGE DU FLE

THE EDUCATIONAL PROJECT, MEANS OF MOTIVATION IN TEACHING AND LEARNING FLE

LA PÉDAGOGIE DU PROJET ET LA MOTIVATION DES ÉLÈVES POUR L’APPRENTISSAGE DU FRANÇAIS

PROJECT PEDAGOGY AND PUPILS’ MOTIVATION IN LEARNING FRENCH

Книжка 4
КАЖДЫЙ ДЛЯ МЕНЯ УЧИТЕЛЬ

Ш.А.Амонашвили

Книжка 3
АНТОАНЕТА ЙОВЧЕВА (1952 – 2014)

След трудна борба с тежката болест ни напусна един добър и мил човек, една светла личност – Анто- анета Йовчева, нашата обичана колежка Тони. Нейните колеги и приятели, многобройните автори и сътрудници на сп. „Начално образование“ и на сп. „Педагогика“ ще запазят завинаги спомена за нейната приветлива усмивка, за нейната отзивчивост и преда- ност към работата, за нейната широка култура и стре- меж към познание, към развитие. Родена на 20 март 1952 г. в София в интелигентно се- мей

Книжка 2
ПОСТМОДЕРНИЗЪМ И ВЪЗПИТАНИЕ

Клавдия Сапунджиева

ДЕТСКИ УНИВЕРСИТЕТИ

Боряна Иванова

ПРОФ. Д-Р ЕЛКА ПЕТРОВА

Има личности, в сиянието на които се оглеж- дат цяла плеада последователи, възпитаници, колеги; има личности, без които животът става по беден, дните по-еднообразни, защото в сър- цето остава празно място. Такава личност е професор, доктор на педа- гогическите науки Елка Петрова – най–големият ерудит в областта на предучилищното възпита - ние, учен с международно значение. Дълги години ще свеждаме глави пред нейна- та обаятелна личност, с искрена признателност ще си спомняме свидните

МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЙ ЦЕНТР ГУМАННОЙ ПЕДАГОГИКИ

Международният център „Хуманна педагогика“ организира XIII педаго- гически четения в периода 20 – 23.03.2014 г. в гр.Тбилиси, Грузия. Форумът се организира със съдействието на грузинското правителство. „Учителят“ е темата, която ще обедини участниците: учители, експерти, родители, универ- ситетски преподаватели, представители на педагогическата общност от мно- го страни, за да се осъществи дискусия за мисията на съвременния учител в съвременния образователен контекст. Ръководството на

Книжка 1
ОСНОВНИ ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКИ НА МОБИЛНОТО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова Лъчезар Лазаров

2013 година
Книжка 9
УЧИТЕЛИ ВЪЗРОЖДЕНЦИ В ТЪРНОВО

Венка Кутева-Цветкова

Книжка 8
ДИМИТЪР ДОНЧЕВ – С ВЪЗХИТА ЗА БЪЛГАРСКИЯ УЧИТЕЛ

100 ГОДИНИ ОТ РОЖДЕНИЕТО НА ДИМИТЪР ЕВСТАТИЕВ ДОНЧЕВ (5.10.1913 – 15.02.1997)

Книжка 7
„СЛЪНЦЕТО“ НА ВЪЗПИТАТЕЛНАТА СИСТЕМА В ТВУ – РАКИТОВО

85 ГОДИНИ ОТ РОЖДЕНИЕТО НА АНГЕЛ УЗУНОВ (1928 – 1999)

ЦЕННОСТИ И ДУХОВНО-НРАВСТВЕНО РАЗВИТИЕ НА МАЛКИЯ УЧЕНИК

Марияна Ешкенази, Гергана Фиданова, Марияна Вишева, Цветанка Годжилова

МАЛКИЯТ УЧЕНИК ЧЕТЕ

Марияна Механджиева Венета Велева

С БАБА И ДЯДО В КЛАС

Цветелин Горанов, Таня Илиева, Цветанка Берова, Нели Иванова, Борка Бончева

РОД РОДА НЕ ХРАНИ, НО ТЕЖКО МУ, КОЙТО ГО НЯМА!

Диляна Вачкова Евелина Димитрова

ДА ПОМОГНЕМ НА ДЕЦАТА ДА ОТВОРЯТ СЪРЦАТА СИ

Иванка Дебелушина Нина Маврикова

ДОБРОТО Е У ВСЕКИ

Мария Наскова

ОТЛИЧЕН ПЕДАГОГ, ПСИХОЛОГ И ПСИХОТЕРАПЕВТ

ДОЦ. СВЕТОСЛАВ СТАМЕНОВ (1939 – 2013)

Книжка 6
ТЕОРЕТИКО-ПРИЛОЖНИ ПРОБЛЕМИ НА КОНСТРУИРАНЕТО НА ТЕСТ ЗА НАЦИОНАЛНО ВЪНШНО ОЦЕНЯВАНЕ ПО „ЧОВЕКЪТ И ОБЩЕСТВОТО“ ЗА 4. КЛАС (2013)

Ваня Петрова, Цонка Каснакова, Мариан Делчев Жана Минчева Радостина Стоянова, Рада Димитрова Мария Темникова

MEDIA IN PRESCHOOL AGE OF CHILD’S LIFE

Sonja Petrovska Jadranka Bocvarova

Книжка 5
ШАЛВА АЛЕКСАНДРОВИЧ АМОНАШВИЛИ – УЧИТЕЛ ОТ БЪДЕЩЕТО

В сложното битие на науката и метамор- фозите на социалната реалност, неотменими и общовалидни остават само най-стойностни- те постижения и безспорни истини, които не само маркират и остойностяват територията на човешко познание, но извисяват самия чо- век, поддържат неговата вяра в доброто, под- хранват чувството му за собствена значимост, укрепват неговия дух. Приемайки извечните послания на класи- ческата философско-педагогическа мъдрост и дълбоко обвързан с педагогическата р

МАНИФЕСТ ГУМАННОЙ ПЕДАГОГИКИ

Преамбула 25 лет тому назад группа учителей новаторов провозгласила манифест „Пе- дагогика сотрудничества“ (Переделкино, 1986 год). В последующие годы были опубликованы отчеты встреч учителей новаторов, в которых рассматри- вались разные аспекты педагогики сотрудничества: „Демократизация лично- сти“ (Цинандали, Телавский район, Грузия, 1987 год), „Методика обновления“ (Москва, 1988 год), „Войдем в новую школу“ (Краснодарский край, 1988 год). Идеи педагогики сотрудничества воодушевленно

ПОРТФОЛИОТО НА УЧЕНИКА КАТО ПРОЦЕС НА САМОПОЗНАНИЕ

Радка Топалска Емилия Вълкова, Албена Атанасова

ДОПИРНИ СВЕТОВЕ

Албена Димитрова Стилияна Гронева

ПРЕДИ ГОДИНА И СЕГА

Веселка Аршинкова

Книжка 4
СВЕЩЕНИК ГЕОРГИ МАРИНОВ ПОЛУГАНОВ – ОСНОВАТЕЛЯТ НА УЧИЛИЩЕТО И ПЪРВИЯТ УЧИТЕЛ В ПОЛИКРАЙЩЕ

Георги Георгиев Трифонка Попниколова Марияна Георгиева–Гроссе

ЕВРОПЕЙСКИ ПРИКАЗКИ

Светла Попова

Книжка 3
ДА ОПАЗИМ ДЕТСКОТО ЗДРАВЕ!

Мая Топалова, Симона Пейчева

КАК ДА ОТГЛЕДАМЕ МАЛЪК ПРИРОДОЛЮБИТЕЛ?

Мадлена Николова Ани Цветкова

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
ИЗКУСТВОТО ЗА ПРЕВЕНЦИЯ НА АГРЕСИВНОТО ПОВЕДЕНИЕ НА ДЕЦАТА

Евгения Миланова Виолета Николова Величка Радева

ПРИЯТЕЛСТВОТО В ЖИВОТА НА ДЕТЕТО

Даниела Димитрова Красимира Василева

ПРЕДАЙ НАТАТЪК

Вилдан Мехмедова

ЗАЕДНО ДА БЪДЕМ ДОБРИ

(ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКА СИТУАЦИЯ В ПОДГОТВИТЕЛНА ГРУПА)

ПРОФ. ДПН EЛКА ПЕТРОВА EДНА НЕЗАЛИЧИМА СЛЕДА В БЪЛГАРСКОТО ПРЕДУЧИЛИЩНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ (1919 – 2012)

Почина проф. дпн Елка Петрова (20.ХІІ.2012 г.) – на- шата любима учителка по изкуството да се живее пъл- ноценно и професионално, създателката на науката за предучилищното възпитание на българските деца, пре- красната жена и велика майка, Неповторима, единствена, съвършена – това е нашата Елка: Примерът за всички нас – хилядите нейни студенти и последователи ! Елка Петрова винаги е първа, винаги е оригинална и авангардна; през 1950–1952 г. поставя началото на Висшия мето

2012 година
Книжка 9
ПЕДАГОГЪТ – РИЦАР НА ДЕТСТВОТО

Януш Корчак бе написал, че животът на великите хора е като легендите: труден, но красив. И се оказва пророчески прав, сякаш е писал за себе си! Наследник на семейство с богата духовна култура и традиции, останал отрано без баща, той не просто се справя с несгодите на сирачеството, но развива у себе си три могъщи извора на живот: любов към свободата и справедливостта, страст към знанието и творчеството, отдаденост на децата и тяхното щастие. Лекарят Корчак лекува децата и душите им. Безплатн

ЯНУШ КОРЧАК – ВЕЛИК ХУМАНИСТ И ПЕДАГОГ

„Със сила и мощ поведох своя живот, който беше привидно неподреден, самотен и чужд. За син избрах идеята да служа на детето и неговото дело. Привидно загубих.“ Бе лекар, писател, мислител. Бе философ, учен, моралист. Издател. Възпи- тател и педагог. Бе герой. Бе скромен. Във всяка от тези области той има изключителни постижения. В течение на по- вече от четиридесет години работи като педагог и писател. Четиридесет години безкористно служене на слабите и беззащитните. Създава съвременна кон

ЕВОЛЮЦИЯ НА ПРАВАТА НА ДЕТЕТО

„Детето има право на сериозно отношение към проблемите му, на справедливото им решаване.“

THE KORCZAK’S RIGHT TO SOCIAL PARTICIPATION OF CHILDREN THE CITIZENSHIP OF CHILDREN

A speech by Marek Michalak, the Ombudsman for Children, given during the seminar„The Polish-Israeli pioneer in the fi eld of human rights, Janusz Korczak (1879–1942) and today’s Convention on Children’s Rights as the part of the international law“, Geneva, the 6 of June 2009

ЗА ДЕТЕТО, ДЕТСТВОТО ИЛИ НАУКА ЗА НЕГО?

В памет на Януш Корчак – по повод 70 г. от неговата смърт и 100 г. от създаването на „Дом за сираци“ във Варшава Албена Чавдарова

Книжка 8
CHANGES IN UNIVERSITY TEACHING – THE ROAD FROM KNOWLEDGE TO COMPETENCIES

Slađana Anđelković Zorica Stanisavljević Petrović

ДОСТОЕН ЖИВОТ, ОТДАДЕН НА ПРОСВЕЩЕНИЕТО… ПРОФ. СТОЙКА ЗДРАВКОВА – ЕДИН СЪВРЕМЕНЕН БУДИТЕЛ НА 70 ГОДИНИ

Неуморна и взискателна! Енергична и всеотдай- на! Работохолик и перфекционист! Това е проф. д-р Стойка Здравкова! Не е за вярване, че в началото на ноември 2012 година навърши 70 години. И не е слу- чайно това, че тази светла дата е непосредствено бли- зо до Деня на будителите. А това, че проф . Здравкова е съвременен български будител, е толкова безспорно и видимо! 70–годишнината ù е един чудесен повод ретрос- пективно да си припомним и проследим най-значи-

Книжка 7
ОЧАКВАНА И ПОЛЕЗНА

Емилия Василева

Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ЦЕННО ПОМАГАЛО ЗА ПСИХОЛОЗИ И ПЕДАГОЗИ (Надежден инструмент за диагностициране смисъла на живота)

Любен Десев Минчев, Борис. Тест на Дж. Крумбъг и Л. Махолик за смисъл в живота. Българска версия. Варна, ВСУ „Черноризец Храбър“,

ГЕОРГИ MАВРОВ ЖИВОТ, ОТДАДЕН НА НАУКАТА И ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Така най-общо, но и най-точно можем да охарак- теризираме дейността на ст. н. с. д-р Георги Петков Мавров. Той ни напусна неочаквано в края на април т.г. И до последния си ден не преставаше да се вълнува от проблемите на образованието. Споделяше инте- ресни мисли относно предстоящото приемане на За- кона за образованието. Пестелив на думи, но щедър на дела – това ясно проличава от неговата богата би- ография.

Книжка 4
ОЩЕ ЕДНА ИДЕЯ

Галина Стоянова

Книжка 3
С ИНОВАТИВЕН ПОГЛЕД КЪМ ЛИЧНОСТТА НА ДЕТЕТО

Маргарита Абрашева Любимка Габрова

БИЗНЕС ОБУЧЕНИЕ В ДЕТСКАТА ГРАДИНА

Красимира Костова Петя Драгоданова

ДЕТСКАТА БЕЗОПАСНОСТ

Любимка Габрова

БАБА ПРИКАЗКИ РАЗКАЗВА... (МИКС ОТ ПРИКАЗКИ)

Кева Захариева, Мария Мичева

Книжка 2
ДЕТЕ ПЪТУВА В АВТОМОБИЛА

Красимира Михайлова

ПРОТИВОПОСТАВЯНЕ

Пюрвя Ердниев, Б. Ердниев

ЗДРАВКА НОВАКОВА – ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛ И ТВОРЕЦ

Седемдесетгодишният юбилей е вълнуващ повод да проследим трудния, богат и съдържателен професионално-творчески път на доц. д-р Здравка Новакова, да под- чертаем нейната важна роля за утвърждаване на дидактика на математиката като

IN MEMORIAM Иван Марев

Напусна ни проф. Иван Марев – философ, педагог, демократ, родолюбец. В далечната 1975 г., зареден с енергия, пълен с идеи, той създаде в Техническия

Книжка 1
ДЕЛЕГИРАНЕ НА ПРАВА ЧРЕЗ КОМИСИИТЕ В ДЕТСКАТА ГРАДИНА

Маргарита Абрашева Политиката, наречена управление на качеството, не е самоцел, нито поредна обра- зователна „мода“. Тя е практически необходима за поддържане от директора на учеб- ното заведение на един привлекателен образ в условията на конкуренция на пазара на учебни заведения. Това се отнася най-вече за детските градини. Политиката на упра- вление на качеството съдържа недостатъчно използван ресурс, включително за спечел- ване и запазване доверието на потребителя – родителите на децата,

ИНОВАЦИОННИ И ИНТЕРАКТИВНИ МЕТОДИ В КВАЛИФИКАЦИОННАТА ДЕЙНОСТ НА ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИЯ КОЛЕКТИВ

Стоилка Ташева, Севда Лукайчева Развиващото се с динамични темпове общество в днешно време налага необ- ходимостта от иновационни промени в областта на образованието. И в предучи- лищната педагогика все по-често се търсят алтернативни педагогически техноло- гии както за възпитанието и обучението на децата, така и при провеждането на квалификационната дейност на самите педагози. Използването на интерактивните методи дава възможност да се възлагат за- дачи, които предполагат съвместна работа,

ТОВА ТРЯБВА ДА ГО ЗНАЕ ВСЯКО ДЕТЕ

Татяна Атанасова, Иванка Пампова

НА УЛИЦАТА Е ОПАСНО

Таня Янчева, Зоя Кацарова