Педагогика

https://doi.org/10.53656/ped2024-5.05

2024/5, стр. 655 - 670

ADDRESSING CHALLENGES IN ENHANCING TEAM COLLABORATION AND EVALUATING INTERDISCIPLINARY PROJECTS

Borislava Kirilova
OrcID: 0000-0002-4916-2233
WoSID: CYL-4772-2022
E-mail: b.kirilova@fmi.uni-sofia.bg
Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics
Sofia University
Sofia Bulgaria

Резюме: The aim of this paper is to clarify the extent to which collaborative project work needs to be promoted to develop key competences, notably autonomous learning, and effective collaboration, essential in the context of our rapidly evolving world. The impact of different assessment methods on the final outcomes of Project Based Learning (PBL) is examined in its interdisciplinary perspective. The samples encompassed 180 American College of Sofia (ACS) students divided into two cohorts: a control group of 60 and an experimental one of 120. Of particular interest is to examine whether the use of alternative assessment techniques is applicable to an interdisciplinary project and how effective they are in incentivizing teamwork. Recommendations aimed at reducing instances of social loafing and increasing student activity in collaborative project work are also discussed. The assessment tools used to measure the course objectives comprise purpose-designed checklists tailored to the specifics course needs. The research methodology is based on extensive observations of project-related activities, including periodic evaluations, questionnaires on the achievement of intermediate objectives, peer evaluations and teachers’ feedback, culminating in a final project report. In addition, a comparative analysis of the students’ academic performance is made, focusing only on the area of mathematics in the context of a multidisciplinary project. This comparative analysis is intended to provide an overall assessment of the efficacy of the alternative assessment techniques used and their suitability for PBL.

Ключови думи: project-based learning; project-oriented learning; interdisciplinary project; teamwork; feedback; alternative assessment; rubric

1. Introduction

Preparing our students for the future poses an uncertain challenge. However, applying the student-centered methods, such as PBL, offers skills to equip our students with the versatility required to navigate real-life scenarios effectively. While PBL lacks a precise definition, in essence, it involves teaching students through tasks that replicate real-world situations within meaningful projects. Here, students collaborate in groups to investigate and solve real-life problems, honing the skills necessary for these endeavors. In accordance with Marasheva’s research (2011), it is evident that the team-based approach and collaborative work methodologies offer substantial benefits when compared to individual and group work. These advantages lead to achievements that individuals and traditional groups cannot attain. Nonetheless, effective collaboration within a team can present challenges, particularly when team members bring distinct proficiencies, inclinations, and responsibilities to the table. Recognizing both the strengths and limitations of teamwork holds paramount importance, fostering individual growth and professional development. This approach aims to prepare the youth for the challenges of the 21st century, complementing the traditional curriculum. Of particular note is the need to reframe project work from an interdisciplinary perspective as a method which fosters students’ self-reliance and acquirement fundamental skill set needed to succeed. In this context, it is imperative not only to assess knowledge but also to evaluate performance. The objective is to translate theoretical understanding into practical applications, necessitating thorough assessment. Performance assessments are centered on intricate open-ended problems that demand advanced cognitive reasoning, innovative problem-solving, teamwork, and digital skills. These assessments prioritize evaluating a student’s methodology in arriving at a solution, going beyond mere determination of whether the answer is correct. Assessment can be applied as a tool to enhance student learning through ongoing evaluation (formative) and to determine whether students have achieved the desired competencies (summative) (Albanese & Hinman 2019). Formative assessment is an integral part of the ongoing teaching-learning process, involving providing feedback to students with the aim of improving teaching, learning, and the curriculum. Summative assessment, on the other hand, occurs at the conclusion of a term or course and primarily serves to provide information about the extent of a student’s learning and the effectiveness of the course (Wojtczak 2002). Importantly, this goes beyond merely assessing a student’s ability to arrive swiftly at the correct answer, necessitating the development of objective criteria and scales for a comprehensive assessment. Traditional assessment methods for measuring achievement, including multiple-choice tests, true/false questions, and matching exercises, have proven insufficient for evaluating student performance (Wiggins 1993). In this regard, Petre (2017) recommends the alternative methods for assessing students’ knowledge and skills. Simonson et al. (2000), identify three approaches to alternative assessment: authentic assessment, performance-based assessment, and constructivist assessment. In the domain of electronics environment, various alternative assessment strategies are used, including learning needs assessment; academic achievement testing; oral and written questionnaires; diagnostic student reflections; informal feedback from diverse sources; group discussions; progress reports; personal one-on-one interactions with each student, among others.

It is important to be mentioned that some authors, when discussing project applications in extracurricular or elective classes, employ the term “ProjectOriented Learning (POL)” as a synonym for Project-Based Learning (PBL) (Leal Filho et al. 2016). Conversely, others, as Chakarova (2022) and (Mellvile 2015)1, contend that both methods are educational approaches in which students engage in project-based learning to acquire knowledge and develop skills, but these approaches exhibit distinctive differences in terms of their underlying principles and methodologies. The key difference lies in the extent to which the project assumes a central role in the learning process. PBL positions the project as the core element, underscoring student-driven inquiry and problem-solving, whereas POL integrates projects within a more traditional curriculum.

2. Background

Project-based learning is the most meaningful when implemented as an interdisciplinary, long-term project. This method not only requiring a diverse range of academic and digital competencies, but also assumed that by addressing challenges through the multidisciplinary perspective, students will attain a comprehensive understanding of various approaches and potential solutions. Kaloyanova (2021) characterized PBL as an educational framework that promotes an interdisciplinary approach, emphasized on the integration of knowledge and skills in real-life scenarios through project-based activities. Consequently, it can be concluded that the most effective approach involves educators from various disciplines collaboratively shaping the subject domains (rather than the specific problems) for students’ subsequent research. Nicolade et al. (2017), state that practical experience demonstrates that comprehending the significance of PBL and, even more so, grasping its core principles through an interdisciplinary perspective, is not always achievable. However, it’s essential to emphasize that this interdisciplinary approach is instrumental for optimizing the enhancement of competencies and proficiencies. Despite its benefits, the application of project-based learning, especially in the classroom, seems quite daunting and almost impossible to implement. It necessitates a high degree of coordination among different subject-areas teachers to allocate sufficient time for PBL and rigorously adhere to the established timetable. Additionally, it is of vital importance that the content taught in the relevant subjects aligns with the proposed research topics. Assessment of students’ knowledge and skills could be carried out by any teacher whose discipline is for in the research, not necessarily with a quantitative assessment against curriculum-level outcomes. Only the final product of the whole group’s activity can be assessed; the process of working effectively together in a group; or an assessment that reflects both the both the end-product and the effectiveness of teamwork throughout the project.

Another important distinction lies in whether the evaluation will be based on a collective assessment of the entire group or on an individual assessment of each student according to their own contribution to the team activity. Alternatively, it can be a combination of both approaches, where a certain percentage reflects the group’s performance, and the remainder accounts for individual contributions. In the latter scenario, the author’s experience indicates that it is advisable not to assign more than 50% of the overall module grade to the group assessment. Regardless of how clearly the evaluation criteria are defined, some students often assert that they have contributed more than the teacher perceives.

The evaluation of PBL is not only influenced by the teaching method and its intended outcomes; it is also greatly impacted by the assessment approach (Holahan et al. 2000). Assessment should be seamlessly integrated into the teaching-learning process, maintaining both formative and summative elements. When formulating assessments in the context of PBL, it is crucial for educators to provide continuous feedback on their students’ progress. Providing reports plays a key role in encouraging students to engage in self-reflection concerning their work and learning process. This introspection allows them to delve deeper into their learning and develop valuable metacognitive skills (Boud & Molloy 2013). Feedback can encompass acknowledgment of students’ accomplishments as well as guidance on the steps required to attain specific objectives. It serves as a motivator, actively engaging students in their learning journey. Commendation and approval reinforce their endeavors, while constructive criticism serves as an incentive for persistence and improvement (Hattie & Timperley 2007). Regardless of the nature of said feedback, be it encouraging or corrective, educators should establish a framework for effectively following up on the comments they provide. To facilitate the implementation of this interdisciplinary approach and recognize its significance in nurturing essential competencies and student learning, it is essential to equip teaching staff with the requisite training in utilizing appropriate digital tools (Nikolade et al. 2017).

3. Methods

Getting started with PBL can be challenging, requiring teachers to define objectives, establish scope, divide students in suitable groups, and, importantly, identify topics that pique students’ interest. PBL also necessitates a digression from traditional grading methods, as interdisciplinary projects cannot be assessed in the same manner as standardized tests or quizzes. Since real-world problems have multifaceted solutions that draw upon knowledge from various subjects and domains, to achieve effective summative assessment in PBL, it would be appropriate to develop well-defined grading standards within rubrics for each subject. As previously mentioned, PBL projects rarely yield a singular correct answer. In fact, many times, there may not be a correct answer at all. Consequently, creating rubrics is a challenging endeavor as they cannot simply consist of a binary ‘yes’ or ‘no’ checklist for determining student grades. Instead, they must consider numerous factors, including students’ engagement, problem-solving approaches, and the ambition and creativity demonstrated in their projects. In this context, Delinov and Marasheva (2014) introduced a comprehensive system comprising eight evaluation criteria for projects, with each criterion further delineated by three specific indicators. Additionally, Tzvetkova and Bankov (2022) put forth an approach for assessing individual students’ teamwork abilities within an educational setting. This method exhibits remarkable adaptability, proving applicable across diverse scenarios regardless of the subject matter. It is also accommodating of teams of varying sizes. The fundamental tasks and the maximum attainable scores can be customized to suit the unique requirements of each project and the specific context.

Comprehensive assessment strategies are crucial for upholding the principles of PBL and providing comprehensive support to every learner throughout their educational journey. By implementing reliable assessment methodologies, PBL can cultivate an environment of exceptional achievement accessible to every student, thereby promoting profound and comprehensive learning experiences. These assessment criteria should be transparent and aligned with a studentcentered approach to learning. Sometimes the most complex part of having an interdisciplinary PBL project is the evaluation, as teachers who are most of the time not used to having to evaluate a common project, are put into a new for them situation. This is where formative assessment is very helpful, as it allows the teachers to just guide the students as to how to improve a particular unit of their project in the required area and, the teacher whose subject is predominant, to grade the work at the end of the milestone. This is also possible through common formative assessment where all the teachers evaluate the project throughout the whole year and still give ideas for improvement, relating to their field. The explored component of this work was to investigate the influence of formative assessment, participation grade, self and peer assessment, and only “leading teacher” assessment in project-based learning on the learning outcome of students and also to probe the level of reliability and validity of these methods of assessment in project-based learning. Due to the interdisciplinary nature of PBL, comprehensive achievement assessment is essential. To attain this objective, the synchronization of assessment methodologies across integrated disciplines is important. To facilitate this, unified assessment rubrics have been implemented, ensuring their relevance in each integrated discipline. For the purpose, five types of checklists were developed:

3.1. Assignment in google classroom for weekly report, assigned and graded by the faculty member (formative or interim assessment)

Tutorial sessions were conducted once a week, spanning over seven months in the 12th-grade course, focusing on three core subjects: Mathematics, Physics/ Entrepreneurship, and IT/Computer Science. The assessment criteria, including weekly communication and reporting, self and peer assessment, and practice presentations, were graded on a scale from 0% to 100%. These assessment types were not applied on a weekly basis; rather, they were tailored to the specific objectives addressed in each tutorial session, predefined at the commencement of the school year. The choice of criteria also corresponded to the stage of the PBL process the student group was engaged in. Following each tutorial session, the “leading teacher” responsible for Mathematics assigned a participation grade (interim assessment) to each group, graded within the 0% to 100% range, based on their performance in the “weekly communication” category. It is important to note that the assessment of participation has sparked considerable debate due to its potential subjectivity and susceptibility to varying interpretations. Jacobs and Chase2 (1992) have outlined several reasons against grading class participation. These include the absence of specific instruction on improving participation, the inherently difficult and subjective nature of interpreting student behavior, the influence of individual personality traits on participation, which may disadvantage shy or introverted students, and the challenges associated with record-keeping, particularly when justifying participation scores in the event of disputes. In contrast to these objections, Holly et al. (2023) believe that grading class participation can send positive messages to students regarding the types of learning and thinking that instructors value. This includes the development of communication skills, critical thinking abilities, and the capacity to construct valid arguments through interactions with peers. Class participation, they contend, plays an important role in a student’s education, and contributes significantly to positive learning outcomes.

Throughout the project, assessing participation was deemed necessary, regardless of individual teacher preferences, as it stood as one of the few means to assess student engagement effectively. To facilitate this process, a participation rubric was provided, encompassing various criteria (such as workload, engagement in surveys and post-class meetings, willingness to accept and solicit feedback from the teacher). This rubric proved instrumental in enhancing understanding, both for teachers and students, of the depth of learning achieved through group work. Essentially, this entailed that both parties could employ the guide to determine which criteria were met and how, allowing students to self-assess their performance by utilizing a Google form and articulating the reasons for their chosen grade. For teachers, this approach facilitated the separation of individual performance from group performance and provided insight into the acceptance of feedback. Furthermore, a comparative analysis of the papers produced by each group was conducted, aiming to discern whether students became more engaged and motivated as they grew more familiar and comfortable with the PBL approach throughout the semester. Towards the end of each month, the “leading teacher” summed the formative grades awarded by all teachers for the “Weekly report” criteria, summarizing them into a single average interim grade. This final grade held both formative and summative value. Additionally, at the close of each month, each subject tutor assessed the students’ performance in the roles they had undertaken during classwork, whether as leaders or participants. These role assessments were primarily formative in nature, aimed at enhancing student performance in future assignments, and did not have summative weight.

3.2. A self-assessment checklist (formative assessment)

Creating a questionnaire in collaboration with students to assess their progress and gauge their alignment with their set goals is a valuable formative assessment practice. This self-assessment process occurred at the conclusion of each month.

Employing a checklist comprising specific criteria to evaluate the cognitive outcomes of the study provides students with a structured means to reflect on their learning achievements at the end of each semester.

3.3. Peer-assessment checklist (formative assessment)

Each group had the opportunity to review another group’s project, providing constructive feedback and, in some cases, to feel additional motivation for progress. Sometimes peers identified aspects that the teacher might have overlooked when making the questionnaires. Although the students gave very carefully assailed notes and assessments, they were given the opportunity to analyze the reasons behind their classmates’ evaluations. Peer assessment was conducted at the conclusion of each month.

3.4. Final report / Article (summative assessment)

The comprehensive report empowers students to perform a self-assessment of their final project. It encompasses inquiries related to the research question, assessing its clarity, conciseness, and its overall merit for study. The final analyze delves into whether the project aligns with the initial plan’s objectives and explores the findings’ relevance. Additionally, it evaluates whether the collected data substantiates the original hypothesis. The questionnaire encompasses essential components such as the rationale behind the study, pertinent background information encompassing theories and prior research related to the examined process, as well as its potential implications on the environment and community. Furthermore, it addresses the identification of potential sources of error in the research.

3.5. Survey for 2021/2022 and 2022/2023 school years (anonymous /not graded)

In addition to the alternative assessment methods, the author has additionally developed a survey (Table 1) that includes questions that specifically address the skills acquired through PBL that are the objective of this study:

– developing autonomous learning skills

– acquire knowledge and skills for teamwork

– developing specific competences for self-assessment and control

The survey instrument (Table 1) included 12 questions, which the students could answer by a 3-point scale: 1 – disagree, 2 – neither agree nor disagree, 3 – agree. This scale was chosen as the preferred option due to the familiarity of ACS students with survey completion. Each school year, students undergo training where they receive clear explanations about the criteria for different types of surveys and how to respond appropriately, especially when encountering double negatives in sentences. As a result, the use of this scale is expected to yield less subjective results. To mitigate subjectivity, some of the questions were asked in several different ways and shuffled on purpose. Sometimes students can be susceptible to subjectivity or provide answers they think the teacher wants to hear. Asking the same question in different ways reduces the probability of misleading answers and encourages students to be more honest. Also, different students have different learning styles and preferences in absorbing information. By asking the same question in multiple ways, each student was given the opportunity to find the appropriate way to express their opinion.

Table 1. Survey questions for 2021/2022 and 2022/2023 school years (anonymous /not graded) Statement

Q.1All of the teachers gave me clear instructions and rubrics about the grading policy”Q.2“The teachers’feedbackwas helpful and I agreewith it”Q.3“Due to the FormativeAssessment grades my project became even moresophistcated”Q.4“Different types of assessment gave me the ability to correct my mistakes in time forthe summative assessment”Q.5“The leading teacher gives an adequate monthly summative grade for the differentsubject areas”Q.6“My class participation during the yearwas graded fairly”Q.7“Setting intermediate goals and receiving the teachers’feedback helped me makeprogress and increased my intrinsic motivation to continue”Q.8All of the group members contributed equally to the development of the project”Q.9“Getting feedback from my peers improved my ability to assess the quality of mywork”Q.10All team members should receive equal grades”Q.11“I accomplishedwhat I set out to do becausewe discussed all the suggestionstogether”Q.12“My grade reflects the quality of mywork and I am satisfiedwith it.”

Figure 1. Students’ survey results

4. Results and discussion

The study encompassed a sample of 180 students from the American College of Sofia, divided into two cohorts: one control group of 60 and an experimental one of 120, and spanned four consecutive school years. During the 2019/2020 school year with the first group of 60 students, only summative assessment was applied, while in the next three years with the second group of 120 students formative assessment was used as well. Petrov (2023) highlights the inadequacy of the entry-level test in Bulgaria, primarily due to its incorrect implementation and lack of consideration for long-term knowledge retention. Usually, this test, conducted at the beginning of the school year, encompasses material from the entire prior school year, rendering it inconducive for diagnosing knowledge accurately. However, it proves suitable for comparing control and experimental groups in pedagogical experiments, providing a reasonably current assessment of students’average proficiency. The grades derived from this test are usually summative in nature. The average results of students in mathematics entry tests are very similar. Table 2 provides a comprehensive overview of all grades, including the scores obtained for both the final product and class participation for the interdisciplinary projects, all assessed using the ACS grading scale. Notably, despite the initial project’s sole focus on mathematics and IT, with a single topic, student performance on the interdisciplinary project exceeded the scores achieved by the Group 2019/2020 cohort. This outcome was unexpected, considering the interdisciplinary project’s development involved collaboration with three instructors. According to Nikolade et al. (2017) the foundation of interdisciplinary projects relies on effective coordination among the teaching staff, with the primary aim of fostering students’ competency development. This advancement represents a significant step toward achieving higher standards in education quality. However, despite mine and my colleagues’ best efforts to collaborate, there were instances when it proved challenging to assemble all parties involved, requiring students to independently pursue their subsequent goals. Nikolova and Ivanov (2022) discussed that peer-review and peer-assessment play established roles as formative assessment techniques and collaborative strategies. These practices foster a strong sense of fairness, self-assurance, and provide valuable constructive feedback. Consequently, the author believes that it’s highly beneficial if the formative assessment precedes summative. A total of sixty students (2021/2022 and 2022/2023 academic years) were administrated a Google Form questionnaire (see Table 1) to elucidate prevalent issues related to teamwork. The questionnaire probed whether students’ projects aligned with their initial plans, the extent to which teachers’ feedback contributed to enhancing performance, and the influence of teamwork on individual roles and responsibilities. The responses obtained (Figure 1) varied in the level of detail provided, but it was found that most students (71.7%) indicated that their projects occasionally surpassed their initial expectations in sophistication. This was attributed to the guidance provided by the teachers, a perspective endorsed by approximately 80% of the respondents. Some students found it necessary to switch project topics, deciding that the new choice was more engaging and practical, fostering skill development relevant to their future needs. Notably, an overwhelming 95% of students expressed satisfaction with their final grades, indicating the effectiveness of the teachers’ feedback practices and the establishment of clear expectations. Only 51.7 % of the students fully agreed that all group members made equitable contributions to project development, while 43.3% believed they achieved their objectives with collective input. At the same time, almost all the students thought that they should receive equal grades. This observation raises concerns regarding inclusivity, as it appears that academically stronger students (10%) may undervalue their peers and prefer to perform independently, while weaker students face challenges in actively participating in teamwork, often remaining isolated. There are many factors that contribute to students’ reluctance to actively participate in group projects. When the sole criterion for evaluation is the achievement of goals, some group members may choose to remain detached from project work, anticipating that others will complete it more swiftly and efficiently without their involvement. From the students’ perspective, the challenge of social loafing emerges as a prominent issue in group projects. The influence of even a single individual engaging in social loafing can significantly disrupt the group’s dynamics. These individuals invest less effort than is considered equitable in the collective endeavor, yet they still reap the benefits of the group’s combined efforts, owing to the shared grading system (Aggarwal & O’Brien 2008). If 81.7% of the students reported setting their personal goals, but only 43.3% received constructive feedback from their team, the author may conclude that:

(a) There might be a misunderstanding among students between collaboration and teamwork.

(b) The team’s goals may lack cohesion and diversity.

(c) Students may need to enhance their soft skills, particularly in communication and collaboration.

Table 2. Summary of the number of students by grades from PBL

GRADEPBLProjectSummative(Math)Number ofGrades2019/2020InterdisciplinaryPBLProjectFormative(Math)Number ofGrades2020/2021InterdisciplinaryPBLProjectParticipation /PeerNumber ofGrades2020/2021InterdisciplinaryPBLProjectSummativeNumber ofGrades2020/2021InterdisciplinaryPBLProjectSummativeNumber ofGrades2021/2022InterdisciplinaryPBLProjectSummativeNumber ofGrades2022/2023Poor(<59.5%)220000Low(59.5% –70.4%)0300000Average(70.5% –80.4%)6160020
Above theaverage(80.5% –91.4%)28814640Excellent(91.5%)24446543420

5. Limitations and future research directions

It is noteworthy that there are two interesting aspects regarding group projects. Although some of the questions from the survey are essentially asking the same question, the responses indicate that students perceive the two aspects differently. This highlights the need to find a more sophisticated peer assessment method to inquire about student individual contributions to foster more candid responses. It is crucial for teachers to emphasize teamwork in the electronic environment, where a significant portion of project-based learning occurs outside of school and requires appropriate supervision and evaluation methods.

The teacher faces the exceptionally challenging task of organizing the working groups in such a way that, subsequently, the members have the opportunity to select a suitable leader. Simultaneously, group members must possess the requisite levels of both hard skills (e.g., computer proficiency, technical and analytical capabilities, internet communication) and soft skills (including effective verbal communication, a strong teamwork ethic, adept time management, and the ability to discern between teamwork and collaboration). This ensures that the work process can effectively advance toward achieving its intended goal. Efforts should be made to enhance mechanisms that distribute workloads equitably, preventing any member from bearing either an excessively light or burdensome load, while also ensuring that no member is excluded from active participation. Pfaff & Huddleston (2003) have highlighted that students’ positive attitudes toward teamwork are directly correlated with their perception of workload equality among group members. The current grading methods underscore the importance of refining the criteria used by educators to measure success, emphasizing the need for greater detail in these criteria. Grading should not solely be based on the achievement of the set goals but also on the level of individual engagement in task accomplishment. Hence, it is essential to distinguish between ‘teamwork’ and ‘collaboration’ and pay closer attention to these distinctions. Addressing these challenges should not be limited to classroom sessions alone but should extend beyond them. Identifying the underlying reasons for students’ reluctance to actively engage in group work within an electronic environment presents a significant challenge. Striking a balance is imperative, as we must manage teamwork to foster inclusivity, while also considering potential conflicts with students’ individual values. Aggarwal & O’Brien (2008) developed some hypothesis regarding the impact of some factors which might reduce the social loafing: (a) scope of the project, (b) group size, (c) group selection, and (d) use of multiple peer evaluations. Another potential factor considered was the lack of technology or digital skills, but in this instance, this hypothesis is not supported. At the beginning of each school year, every ACS student is provided with a personal Chromebook, which is mandatory for classroom use, replacing traditional notebooks. Consequently, working in an electronic environment and mastering skills related to sourcing, managing, evaluating, and deriving reliable information from digital data have become integral aspects of students’ education. Future research endeavors should prioritize promoting reflective discussions regarding the PBL requirements concerning group size and selection. Given that this case study was limited to a comparatively small group of students from American College of Sofia, and the rubrics for the participation items were developed by a small team of teachers in physics, informatics and mathematics, there is potential for bias in the formative assessments and checklists (see the appendix). Therefore, the results of the study may be subject to potential inaccuracies or limitations in terms of generalizability.

6. Conclusion

The attitude of each team member significantly influences the ultimate outcome when engaging in teamwork. If even one member harbors a negative attitude towards the task, it can inevitably affect the attitudes of others, leading to the gradual development of social passivity. Conversely, overly dominant behavior also hinders positive social interactions among team members. Perhaps one of the most interesting findings is the observation that certain highly self-assured students tend to take over the execution of tasks, leaving little room for their teammates to showcase their skills. This issue presents a dual challenge. On one hand, it fosters an unfavorable working environment among learners, and on the other, it poses difficulties for mentors in addressing issues related to social loafing. This is particularly relevant given the substantial effort required to provide meaningful feedback to students during PBL. Project-based learning can be initially daunting, as it requires a change in the core principles of the school curriculum. This transformation encompasses aspects such as grading, student participation, and the roles that students and teachers assume in the classroom. However, this shift in assessment methods proves liberating, as it grants students the freedom to experiment and become more deeply engaged in their tasks without the fear of facing negative repercussions, as there are no absolute right or wrong answers. Additionally, this approach empowers the teachers to improve their evaluation criteria throughout the school year, based on what they find to be more valuable. It also allows for a more equitable grading system that considers not only the final outcomes but also the effort invested by individual students in their projects. Furthermore, the coordination team demonstrates greater confidence in interdisciplinary collaboration when designing project experiences that encourage students to cross disciplinary boundaries. This interdisciplinary approach fosters the development of what is commonly referred to as “21st-century skills”, a concept that encompasses vital facets of contemporary student learning. These include critical thinking, problem-solving, collaboration, effective verbal and online communication, information and technology literacy, creativity, and overall self-reliance – a comprehensive skill set that empowers individuals to create independently. Given the significant educational value of these skills, the author contends that incorporating interdisciplinary project-based learning into the classroom is not only feasible but also essential. In numerous Bulgarian educational institutions, PBL has evolved into an indispensable element of the educational framework. Many educators adeptly integrate this approach into their daily teaching routines. The current edition of the “Best Practices in Focus” competition, organized by the “Teach for Bulgaria” foundation and the educational website “prepodavame.bg”, centers on educational practices closely tied to PBL. Despite the potential initial challenges associated with its integration, its long-term benefits make it a worthwhile endeavor.

NOTES

1. MELVILLE, A. (2015). Academy, M. P., & Academy, M. P. The difference between Project Based Learning and Project Oriented Learning: Process vs. product. Chicago Private Schools | Morgan Park Academy. [viewed 25 October 2023]. Available from: https://morganparkacademy.wordpress.com/2015/12/17/thedifference-between-project-based-learning-and-project-oriented-learning-processvs-product/?fbclid=IwAR0_zlAYdYUYWmwP-GPNqZ-hfkJTaC4RJvGnjfOmvd_ NN5NEjg970T3zepo

2. JACOBS, C., & CHASE, I., 1992. Developing and using tests effectively. A guide for faculty. ERIC. Retrieved December 20, 2022. [viewed 25 October 2023] Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED351948

REFERENCES

AGGARWAL, P. & O’BRIEN, L., 2008. Social loafing on group projects. Journal of Marketing Education, vol. 30, no.3, pp. 255 – 264. [viewed 20 October 2023] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475308322283.

ALBANESE, A. & HINMAN, L., 2019. Types and design of assessment in PBL. The Wiley Handbook of Problem‐Based Learning, pp. 389 – 409 [viewed 20 October 2023]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119173243. ch17.

BEAN, J. & PETERSON, D., 1998. Grading classroom participation. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, vol. 74, pp. 33 – 40 [viewed 18 October 2023]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.7403.

BELL, S., 2010. Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and

Ideas, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 39 – 43 [viewed 18 October 2023]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415.

BEN-DAVID, M., 2000. The role of assessment in expanding professional horizons. Medical Teacher, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 472 – 477 [viewed 18 October 2023]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590050110731.

BOUD, D. & MOLLOY, E., 2013. Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 698 – 712.

CHAKAROVA, S., 2022. Project-Oriented and Project-Based Learning – characteristics, comparison and application in Bulgarian language learning (8th – 12th grade). Bulgarski Ezik i Literatura – Bulgarian Language and Literature, vol.64, no. 5, pp. 100 – 121. ISSN 1314-8516. [In Bulgarian]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.53656/bel2022-5-10-ACHprbol.

DELINOV, E. & MARASHEVA-DELINOVA, IV., 2014. Kriterii za ocenka na proekt s prakticheski prednaznachenie. Mathematics and education in mathematics, Proceedings of the Forty Third Spring Conference of the Union of Bulgarian Mathematicians [In Bulgarian]. pp. 248 – 254.

HATTIE, J. & TIMRERLEY, H., 2007. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 81 – 112 [viewed 1 November 2023]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.

HOLAHAN, J.; JURKAT, M. & FRIEDMAN, A., 2000. Evaluation of a mentor teacher model for enhancing mathematics instruction through the use of computers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 336 – 350. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.2000.107 82284.

HOLLY, C.; PORTER, S.; VITALE, T. & ECHEVARRIA, M., 2023. Grading participation in the classroom: The assumptions, challenges, and alternatives. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.teln.2023.06.020.

KALOYANOVA, N., 2021. Kreativni tehniki v Proektno-Baziranoto obuchenie. Academic Journal of Management and Education, vol. 17, no. 1, pp.139– 147 [In Bulgarian].

LEAL FILHO, W.; SHIEL, C. & PACO, A., 2016. Implementing and operationalizing integrative approaches to sustainability in Higher Education: The Role of Project-oriented learning. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 33, pp. 126 – 135. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.079.

MARASHEVA- DELINOVA, IV., 2010.Opredeliane na ekipi pri rabota po proekti. Papers at the Jubilee International Conference Dedicated to the 60th Anniversary of Prof. Sava Grozdev, Synergetics and Reflection in Mathematics Education. Plovdiv: Paisii Hilendarski University Press [In Bulgarian].

NICOLALDE, M.; CALVOPINA, M.; MEDINA, M., 2017. Project-based learning, from an interdisciplinary perspective. Lecturas: Educación Física y Deportes, vol. 22, no. 235. ISSN 1514-3465.

NIKOLOVA, N.; IVANOV, S., 2022. The role of the peer-assessment in teachers’ education. EDULEARN22 Proceedings, pp. 4593 – 4601. Available from: doi: 10.21125/edulearn.2022.1096.

PFAFF, E. & HUDDLESTON, P., 2003. Does it matter if I hate teamwork? What impacts student attitudes toward teamwork. Journal of Marketing Education, vol. 25, pp. 37 – 45.

PETRE, A., 2017. The impact of alternative assessment strategies on students. Scientific research and education in the air force, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 157 – 160. Available from: doi:10.19062/2247-3173.2017.19.2.22.

PETROV, F., 2023. Atakuvane na tri actualni problema v obuchenieto po informatika I informacionni tehnologii vuz osnova na idei ot 70-te godini na XX v., rodeni v konteksta na matematicheskoto obrazovanie v Bulgaria. Mathematics education - 75 years of mission and history. Sofia: St. Kliment Ohridski [In Bulgarian]. ISBN 978-954-07-5742-1.

SIMONSON, M.; ALBRIGHT, M. & ZVACEK, S., 2000. Assessment for distance education. Teaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance Education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. ISBN 0-13769258-7.

THIBAUT, L.; CEUPPENS, S. ET ALL., 2018. Integrated STEM Education: A systematic review of instructional practices in Secondary Education. European Journal of STEM Education, vol. 3, no. 1. Available from: https://doi. org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525.

TZVETKOVA, I.; BANKOV, K., 2022. Method for assessing individual students in teamwork at school. Proceedings of 20th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET).

WIGGINS, G., 1993. Assessment: Authenticity, context and validity. Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 200 – 214.

WOJTCZAK, A., 2002. Glossary of medical education terms: Part 1. Medical Teacher, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 216 – 219. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1080/01421590220120722.

2025 година
Книжка 9s
Книжка 9
DEVELOPMENT OF DEMOCRATIC CULTURE THROUGH CONTENTS ABOUT THE ROMA IN CLASSROOM TEACHING – STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION

Aleksandra Trbojević, Biljana Jeremić, Hadži Živorad Milenović, Bojan Lazić

Книжка 8
КАТЕГОРИАЛНИ ИЗМЕРЕНИЯ НА ИНФОРМАЦИОННО-КОМУНИКАЦИОННИТЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ СЪС СОП

д.п.н Мира Цветкова-Арсова, Данка Щерева, Славина Лозанова, Маргарита Томова

Книжка 7
ВРЪЗКА НА СОЦИАЛНО-ЕМОЦИОНАЛНОТО С КОГНИТИВНОТО РАЗВИТИЕ В ПРИОБЩАВАЩА СРЕДА

Милен Замфиров, Маргарита Бакрачева, Емилия Евгениева

Книжка 6
КОГНИТИВНО РАЗВИТИЕ НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ, ОБХВАНАТИ В ПРИОБЩАВАЩОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Милен Замфиров, Емилия Евгениева, Маргарита Бакрачева

Книжка 5
COMPETENCE FOR SOCIAL PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICE: WHAT DO STUDENTS TELL US?

Maya Tcholakova, Marina Pironkova, Aleksandar Ranev, Yana Staneva

MULTIMODAL COMMUNICATION IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION CLASSES

Cristiana Lucretia Pop, Cristina Filip

Книжка 4s
GAMES IN FUNCTION OF DEVELOPMENT OF MULTIPLICATION SKILLS

Dasare Sylejmani, Vesna Makashevska, Jasmina Jovanovska

Книжка 4
ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА СИСТЕМИТЕ ЗА УПРАВЛЕНИЕ НА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО В КОНТЕКСТА НА ИНТЕРАКТИВНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Силвия Парушева, Борис Банков, Гергана Касабова, Петя Страшимирова

MILITARY AND SOCIAL THREATS AS DETERMINANTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONTEMPORARY UKRAINIAN HIGHER EDUCATION

Mykola Pantiuk, Tetiana Pantiuk, Nataliia Bakhmat, Olena Nevmerzhytska, Svitlana Ivakh

STEM ОБУЧЕНИЕ НА СТУДЕНТИ ПЕДАГОЗИ В ТРАНСДИСЦИПЛИНАРНА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА СРЕДА

Любен Витанов, Николай Цанев, Людмила Зафирова, Гергана Христова, Катерина Динкова, Калина Георгиева, Жорж Кюшев, Здравка Савчева

ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ И АНАЛИЗ НА НАГЛАСИТЕ НА СТУДЕНТИТЕ ПРИ ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА ГЕНЕРАТИВЕН ИНСТРУМЕНТ НА ИЗКУСТВЕН ИНТЕЛЕКТ

Николай Янев, Иглика Гетова, Теодора Христова, Ива Костадинова, Георги Димитров

Книжка 3
ДРУГИЯТ КАТО ЦЕННОСТ В УЧИЛИЩЕ

Александър Кръстев

Книжка 2
ASSESSMENTS OF TEACHERS AND PARENTS OF CHILDREN WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ON INCLUSION IN PRE-SCHOOL INSTITUTIONS

Zagorka Markov, Hadzi Zivorad Milenovic, Biljana Jeremic, Radmila Zecevic, Milica Pavlovic

Книжка 1s
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА СРЕДСТВАТА ЗА ДОПЪЛВАЩА И АЛТЕРНАТИВНА КОМУНИКАЦИЯ В ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИТЕ ИНСТИТУЦИИ В БЪЛГАРИЯ

. Неда Балканска, . Анна Трошева-Асенова, . Пенка Шапкова, Снежина Михайлова

USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING

Ekaterina Sofronieva, Christina Beleva, Galina Georgieva

Книжка 1
Скъпи читатели, автори, приятели на списание „Педагогика“,

В началото на 2025 година в първия брой на нашето списание „Педагогика“ бих искала от името на редакционната колегия и от мое име да Ви пожелая здраве, творческо вдъхновение и професионално удовлетворение от прино- са Ви към педагогическата наука и практика! Вярвам и се надявам, че списание „Педагоги- ка“ ще продължи да осигурява платформа за научен, обективен и откровен диалог, базиран на резултати от научни изследвания, за насто- ящето и бъдещето на обучението и образова- н

2024 година
Книжка 9s
Книжка 9
ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT OF VIDEO LEARNING RESOURCES IN SMALL-SCALE LEARNING SCENARIOS

César Córcoles, Laia Blasco-Soplon, Germán Cobo Rodríguez, Ana-Elena Guerrero-Roldán

Книжка 8
АНГАЖИРАНОСТ КЪМ УЧЕНЕ ЧРЕЗ ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА СМАРТ ТЕХНОЛОГИИТЕ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Кирилка Тагарева, Дора Левтерова-Гаджалова, Ваня Сивакова

Книжка 7
Книжка 6
Книжка 5s
ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВАТА НА СТАЖАНТСКАТА ПРАКТИКА ПРЕД СТУДЕНТИ – БЪДЕЩИ УЧИТЕЛИ

Илиана Петкова, Марияна Илиева, Владислава Станоева, Георги Чавдаров

Книжка 5
FEATURES OF SPEECH COMPREHENSION TRAINING OF CHILDREN WITH AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS

Maryna Branytska, Svitlana Myronova, Svitlana Mykhalska

OVERVIEW OF THE STEM EDUCATION IN ISRAEL

Aharon Goldreich, Elena Karashtranova

Книжка 4
НАГЛАСИ НА СТУДЕНТИТЕ КЪМ СМАРТ ТЕХНОЛОГИИТЕ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Дора Левтерова-Гаджалова, Кирилка Тагарева, Ваня Сивакова

PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT FOR YOUNG RESEARCHERS

Emina Vukašinović, Marija Veselinović, Milan Milikić

РОБОТИТЕ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО – ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА STEAM ИГРА

Мария Желязкова, Михаил Кожухаров, Даниела Кожухарова

Книжка 3s
Книжка 3
ATTITUDES AND EXPERIENCES OF THE PRESCHOOL TEACHERS IN THE APPLICATION OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION

Nataša Branković, Gordana Kozoderović, Biljana Jeremić, Danijela Petrović, Bojan Lazić, Slavica Karanović

ДИГИТАЛНИ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ПОДКРЕПА НА УЧЕНЕТО

Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова, Лъчезар Лазаров

PREPARATION OF FUTURE TEACHERS FOR ORGANISING A HEALTH-PRESERVING INCLUSIVE SPACE IN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

Nadiya Skotna, Tetiana Nadimyanova, Anna Fedorovych, Myroslava Sosiak, Oksana Yatsiv

Книжка 2s
Книжка 2
ОТ РИСУНКА – КЪМ СНИМКА

Камен Теофилов

Книжка 1s
Книжка 1
„ВТОРОТО“ БЪЛГАРСКО УЧИЛИЩЕ. ГЕНЕЗИСЪТ

Пенка Цонева, Бистра Мизова

2023 година
Книжка 9
EXPLORING THE NARRATIVE IDENTITY OF HUNGARIAN TEACHERS IN SLOVAKIA

Patrik Baka, Terézia Stredl, Kinga Horváth, Zsuzsanna Huszár, Melinda Nagy, Péter Tóth, András Németh

Книжка 8
A QUALITY “ONLINE” TEACHER – WHAT DO STUDENTS APPRECIATE AND VALUE IN TEACHERS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING?

Irena Golubović-Ilić, Ivana Ćirković-Miladinović, Nataša Vukićević

SUPPORT FOR THE INCLUSION OF ROMA CHILDREN THROUGH THE PROJECT TEACHING MODEL

Biljana Jeremić, Aleksandra Trbojević, Bojan Lazić, Gordana Kozoderović

TREND ANALYSIS OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCES OF SPORTS TEACHERS AND COACHES

Sergejs Capulis, Valerijs Dombrovskis, Svetlana Guseva, Alona Korniseva

Книжка 7
ЦЕННОСТЕН ПРОФИЛ НА УЧИТЕЛИТЕ В НАЦИОНАЛЕН КОНТЕКСТ

Цветан Давидков, Силвия Цветанска

Книжка 6s
MODELLING OF MARITIME CYBER SECURITY EDUCATION AND TRAINING

Gizem Kayisoglu, Pelin Bolat, Emre Duzenli

INTRODUCING THE USE OF CASE STUDIES METHODOLOGY IN TRAINING FOR SOFT SKILLS IN MARITIME UNIVERSITIES. THE ISOL-MET PROGRAM

Maria Lekakou, Helen Iakovaki, Dimitris Vintzilaios, Markella Gota, Giorgos Georgoulis, Thalia Vintzilaiou

THE ROLE OF MARITIME EDUCATION IN DIGITALIZATION

Kamelia Narleva, Yana Gancheva

Книжка 6
С МИСИЯ ЗА НАЦИОНАЛНА И КУЛТУРНА ИНДИВИДУАЛНОСТ

Надежда Кръстева, Йордан Колев

Книжка 5s
PREFACE

Nikola Vaptsarov Naval Academy is the oldest technical educational institution in Bulgaria. The Naval Academy is one of the symbols of Varna and Bulgaria in the world maritime community. Its history and achievements establish it as the most prestigious center for training of maritime specialists. At present, the Naval Academy trains specialists for the Navy and for the merchant marine in all areas of maritime life. Research and development conducted at the Naval Academy in Varna

A FAIR CONCERN ABOUT ECDIS

Nikolay Sozonov, Dilyan Dimitranov

DATA-DRIVEN LEARNING APPROACH TO MARITIME ENGLISH

Jana Kegalj, Mirjana Borucinsky, Sandra Tominac Coslovich

DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS THROUGH THE “CASE STUDY” TEACHING METHOD IN MARITIME ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING (MELT)

Tamila Mikeladze, Svetlana Rodinadze, Zurab Bezhanovi, Kristine Zarbazoia, Medea Abashidze, Kristine Iakobadze

MAXIMIZING STUDENTS’ LEARNING IN MARITIME ENGLISH ONLINE COURSE

Valentyna Kudryavtseva, Svitlana Barsuk, Olena Frolova

Книжка 5
Книжка 4s
Книжка 4
Книжка 3s
СПИРАЛАТА ОБЩЕСТВО – ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Иванка Шивачева-Пинеда

Книжка 3
ПРОЕКТНО БАЗИРАНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ ЗА СОЦИАЛНО-ЕМОЦИОНАЛНИ И ТЕХНОЛОГИЧНИ УМЕНИЯ ЧРЕЗ ПРОГРАМАТА „УМЕНИЯ ЗА ИНОВАЦИИ“

Галин Цоков, Александър Ангелов, Йоанна Минчева, Рени Димова, Мария Цакова

МЕДИЙНАТА ГРАМОТНОСТ И УЧИТЕЛИТЕ

Светла Цанкова, Стела Ангова, Мария Николова, Иван Вълчанов, Илия Вълков, Георги Минев

Книжка 2
INTONATION AND CHILDREN WITH EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL PROBLEMS

Katerina Zlatkova-Doncheva, Vladislav Marinov

Книжка 1
2022 година
Книжка 9
ТРАНСГРЕСИВНО-СИНЕРГИЧНО КАРИЕРНО РАЗВИТИЕ В „НЕФОРМАЛНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ“ В УНИВЕРСИТЕТА

д.п.н Яна Рашева-Мерджанова, Моника Богданова, Илиана Петкова

Книжка 8
INTEGRATING INTERCULTURAL EDUCATION IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOL CURRICULUM

Bujar Adili, Sonja Petrovska, Gzim Xhambazi

НАГЛАСИ НА БЪДЕЩИТЕ ДЕТСКИ УЧИТЕЛИ КЪМ STEM ПОДХОДА

Наталия Павлова, Михаела Тончева

Книжка 7
НАЦИОНАЛНАТА ИДЕЯ НА ПАИСИЙ ХИЛЕНДАРСКИ

Йордан Колев, Надежда Кръстева

Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ИВАН Д. ШИШМАНОВ – ЕВРОПЕИЗИРАНИЯТ БЪЛГАРИН

Надежда Кръстева, Йордан Колев

THE TECHNOLOGY OF DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNICATIVE CULTURE OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS

Mariia Oliiar, Nataliia Blahun, Halyna Bilavych, Nataliia Bakhmat, Tetyana Pantyuk

Книжка 4
TEACHERS’ATTITUDES BOUT TEACHING AND LEARNING MATHEMATICS

Aleksandra Mihajlović, Emina Kopas-Vukašinović, Vladimir Stanojević

EDUCATION 4.0 – THE CHANGE OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE LABOUR MARKET

Gergana Dimitrova, Blaga Madzhurova, Stefan Raychev, Dobrinka Stoyanova

Книжка 3s
DISTANCE LEARNING IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMICS

Baktybek Keldibekov, Shailoobek Karagulov

DIGITAL UNIVERSITIES: FEATURES AND KEY CHARACTERISTICS

Marina Skiba, Maktagali Bektemessov, Alma Turganbayeva

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
TWO-TIER MODEL OF TRAINING FUTURE TEACHERS FOR COACHING AT OUT-OF-SCHOOL INSTITUTIONS

Borys Savchuk, Tetyana Pantyuk, Natalia Sultanova, Halyna Bilavych, Mykola Pantyuk

Книжка 1
2021 година
Книжка 9
ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЕТО МЕЖДУ ФОРМАЛНОТО И НЕФОРМАЛНОТО ЗДРАВНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Доц. д-р Вержиния Боянова Гл. ас. д-р Константин Теодосиев Гл. ас. д-р Берджухи Йорданова

FORMATION OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE OF ASSISTANT TEACHER OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN SECONDARY EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

Prof. Dr. Vladyslava Liubarets, Prof. Dr. Nataliia Bakhmat, Prof. Dr. Olena Matviienko, Oksana Tsykhmeistruk, Inna Feltsan

Книжка 8
ОТНОСНО ЗАДЪЛЖИТЕЛНОСТТА НА ПРЕДУЧИЛИЩНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ – РЕЗУЛТАТИ ОТ ЕДНО ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ

Проф. д-р Маргарита Колева, доц. д-р Блага Джорова, д-р Ева Жечева

INFLUENCE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PEDAGOGICAL FEATURES OF STUDENTS ON THEIR ACTIVITY IN SELF-EDUCATION

Dr. Iryna Sereda, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Svitlana Karskanova, Assoc. Prof.

CENTRALISATION AND DECENTRALISATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HUNGARY AND GERMANY

Carla Liege Rodrigues Pimenta, Prof. Dr. Zolt†n R–nay, Prof. Dr. Andr†s Nmet

ЗА ПРИОБЩАВАНЕТО, ОБУЧЕНИЕТО И РАЗВИТИЕТО НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ С ИНТЕЛЕКТУАЛНИ ЗАТРУДНЕНИЯ

Златкова-Дончева, К. (2021). Приобщаване, обучение и развитие на деца и ученици с интелектуални затруднения. Бургас: Либра СКОРП, ISBN 978-954-471-705-6

Книжка 7s
CONCEPT OF PRESENT PRACTICE IN CHOOSING OF OPTIMAL NUMBER OF TUGS

Rino Bošnjak, Zvonimir Lušić , Filip Bojić, Dario Medić

S-101 CHARTS, DATABASE TABLES FOR S-101 CHARTS, AUTONOMOUS VESSEL

Vladimir Brozović, Danko Kezić, Rino Bošnjak, Filip Bojić

INFLUENCE OF HYDRO-METEOROLOGICAL ELEMENTS ON THE SHIP MANOEUVRING IN THE CITY PORT OF SPLIT

Zvonimir Lušić , Nenad Leder, Danijel Pušić, Rino Bošnjak

MEETING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS – EXPERIENCE FROM THE LARGEST SHIPPING COMPANIES

Katarina Balić , Helena Ukić Boljat, Gorana Jelić Mrčelić, Merica Slišković

OPTIMISING THE REFERENCE POINT WITHIN A JOURNAL BEARING USING LASER ALIGNMENT

Ty Aaron Smith , Guixin Fan , Natalia Nikolova , Kiril Tenekedjiev

REVIEW OF THE CURRENT INCREASE OF NOISE UNIT COST VALUES IN TRANSPORT

Luka Vukić , Ivan Peronja , Mihaela Bukljaš , Alen Jugović

TARGET DETECTION FOR VISUAL COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM

Miro Petković, Danko Kezić, Igor Vujović, Ivan Pavić

NEW RESULTS FOR TEACHING SHIP HANDLING USING FAST TIME SIMULATION

Knud Benedict , MichŽle Schaub , Michael Baldauf , Michael Gluch , Matthias Kirchhoff , Caspar Krüger

POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF ELECTRICALY DRIVEN FERRY, CASE STUDY

Tina Perić, Ladislav Stazić, Karlo Bratić

SITUATIONAL AWARENESS – KEY SAFETY FACTOR FOR THE OFFICER OF THE WATCH

Hrvoje Jaram, Pero Vidan, Srđan Vukša, Ivan Pavić

Книжка 7
INCLUSIVE INTELLIGENCE

Dr. Aleksandar Krastev, Assist. Prof.

EDUCATION OF MORAL CULTURE OF STUDENT YOUTH IN THE CONDITIONS OF POLYCULTURAL SPACE

Dr. Natalia Bondarenko, Assoc. Prof. Yevhen Rozdymakha Dr. Lyudmila Oderiy, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Anatoly Rozdymakha, Assoc. Prof. Dilyana Arsova, PhD student

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN KOSOVO – RESEARCH OF TRAINING PROGRAMS AND TESTS

Bekim Samadraxha, Veton Alihajdari, Besim Mustafa, Ramë Likaj

Книжка 6s
EVALUATION OF CRUISER TRAFFIC VARIABLES IN SEAPORTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA

Maja Račić, Katarina Balić, Mira Pavlinović, Antonija Mišura

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CONTRACTS FOR MARITIME TRANSPORT SERVICES. CHAIN OF CHARTER PARTIES

Svetlana Dimitrakieva, Ognyan Kostadinov, Christiana Atanasova

THE LIGHTSHIP MASS CALCULATION MODEL OF A MERCHANT SHIP BY EMPIRICAL METHODS

Vedran Slapničar , Katarina Zadro , Viktor Ložar , Ivo Ćatipović

ON EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN MARITIME COMMUNICATIONS AND THE GMDSS DURING THE COVID-19

Chavdar Alexandrov, Grozdyu Grozev, Georgi Dimitrov, Avgustin Hristov

AIR POLLUTANT EMISSION MEASUREMENT

Nikola Račić, Branko Lalić, Ivan Komar, Frane Vidović, Ladislav Stazić

ASSESSMENT OF LNG BUNKERING ACCIDENTS

Peter Vidmar, Andrej Androjna

EGR OPERATION INFLUENCE ON THE MARINE ENGINE EFFICIENCY

Delyan Hristov, Ivan Ivanov, Dimitar Popov

THE MEASUREMENT OF EXHAUST GAS EMISSIONS BY TESTO 350 MARITIME – EXHAUST GAS ANALYZER

Bruna Bacalja, Maja Krčum, Tomislav Peša, Marko Zubčić

PROPELLER LOAD MODELLING IN THE CALCULATIONS OF MARINE SHAFTING TORSIONAL VIBRATIONS

Nenad Vulić, Karlo Bratić, Branko Lalić, Ladislav Stazić

MODELING OF THE DEPENDENCE OF CO

Hristo Hristov, Ivailo Bakalov, Bogdan Shopov, Dobromir Yovkov

TECHNICAL DIAGNOSTICS OF MARINE EQUIPMENT WITH PSEUDO-DISCRETE FEATURES

Guixin Fan , Natalia Nikolova , Ty Smith , Kiril Tenekedjiev

CONTRIBUTION TO THE REDUCTION OF THE SHIP’S SWITCHBOARD BY APPLYING SENSOR TECHNOLOGY

Nediljko Kaštelan, Marko Zubčić, Maja Krčum, Miro Petković

THE STAND FOR FIN DRIVES ENERGY TESTING

Andrzej Grządziela , Marcin Kluczyk , Tomislav Batur

INTRODUCTION OF 3D PRINTING INTO MARINE ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION – A CASE STUDY

Ivica Kuzmanić, Igor Vujović, Zlatan Kulenović, Miro Petković

SHIPYARD CRANE MODELING METHODS

Pawel Piskur, Piotr Szymak, Bartosz Larzewski

Книжка 6
TEACHERS' PERSPECTIVE ON THE EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF ONLINE TEACHING

Dr. Julien-Ferencz Kiss, Prof. Dr. Florica Orțan, Dr. Laurențiu Mˆndrea

ПСИХОЛОГО-ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ ПРАВИЛА, МОДЕЛИ НА ДОБРИ ПРАКТИКИ И ПРЕПОРЪКИ ПРИ РАБОТАТА И ОБУЧЕНИЕТО НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ С ПОВЕДЕНЧЕСКИ РАЗСТРОЙСТВА

Тричков, Ив., 2019. Психолого-педагогически правила, модели на добри прак- тики и препоръки при работата и обучението на деца и ученици

Книжка 5
ФИДАНА ДАСКАЛОВА ЗА ПЕДАГОГИКАТА

Маргарита Колева, Йордан Колев

ВОЕННОМОРСКОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ – ЕДИН РАЗЛИЧЕН ПОГЛЕД

Кожухаров, А. (2021). Личните академични документи на българската военна образователна система (1892 – 1946). Варна: ВВМУ, ISBN 978-619-7428-55-1

Книжка 4
Книжка 3
НЕВРОДИДАКТИКА

Наталия Витанова

ЗА АСИСТИРАЩИТЕ И ИНФОРМАЦИОННИТЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Сивакова, В. (2020). Асистиращи и информационни технологии

Книжка 2
ОВЛАДЯВАНЕ НА КЛЮЧОВИ КОМПЕТЕНЦИИ ПРИ ОРИЕНТИРАНЕ В СВЕТА

Стоянова, М. (2019). Овладяване на ключови компетенции при ориентиране в света. София: Авангард принт, ISBN 978-954-337-398-7 374

Книжка 1
BULGARIAN SCHOOL – SHOWCASE OF IDENTITY

Veska Gyuviyska, Nikolay Tsankov

ЗА ИЗБОРА НА УЧЕБЕН КОМПЛЕКТ ПО БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕЗИК И ЛИТЕРАТУРА В НАЧАЛЕН ЕТАП. И ЗА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО

Георгиева, А. (2020). Съвременни проекции на обучението по български език

КОНТРОЛ НА СТРЕСА. ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКИ И УПРАВЛЕНСКИ РАКУРСИ

Стоянов, В. (2020). Управление на стреса в организацията. Психологически и управленски ракурси. 198 cтр., Варна: Стено, ISBN 978-619-241-119-0

2020 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
EDUCATIONAL REASONS FOR EARLY SCHOOL DROP-OUT

Maria Teneva, Zlatka Zhelyazkova

Книжка 7s
TEACHING CHALLENGES IN SPORTS EDUCATION DURING THE PANDEMIC COVID-19

Evelina Savcheva, Galina Domuschieva-Rogleva

THE DIFFERENCES IN STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES ABOUT ONLINE TEACHING DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Aleksić Veljković Aleksandra , Slađana Stanković , Irena Golubović-Ilić , Katarina Herodek

ONLINE EDUCATION DURING PANDEMIC, ACCORDING TO STUDENTS FROM TWO BULGARIAN UNIVERSITIES

Antoaneta Getova¹ , Eleonora Mileva² , Boryana Angelova-Igova²

Книжка 7
ПОДГОТОВКАТА НА ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ КАДРИ ЗА ПРЕДУЧИЛИЩНИТЕ ВЪЗПИТАТЕЛНИ ЗАВЕДЕНИЯ ПРЕЗ ПЕРИОДА 1944 – 1991 ГОДИНА

Въчева, С. (2019). Подготовката на педагогически кадри за предучилищните възпитателни заведения през периода

ПАЗАРНИ МЕХАНИЗМИ В УЧИЛИЩНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ. ТЕОРЕТИКО-ПРИЛОЖНИ ВЪПРОСИ

Първанова, Й. (2020) Пазарни механизми в училищното образование. Теоретико-приложни въпроси. София: Колбис, ISBN 978-619-7284-35-5

Книжка 6
TEACHERS ATTITUDES ABOUT INTEGRATED APPROACH IN TEACHING

Emina Kopas-Vukašinović, Aleksandra Mihajlović, Olivera Cekić-Jovanović

Книжка 5
КОНЦЕПТУАЛНИ МОДЕЛИ ЗА РАЗРАБОТВАНЕ НА ПОЗНАВАТЕЛНИ ОНЛАЙН ИГРИ В ОБЛАСТТА НА КУЛТУРНОТО НАСЛЕДСТВО

Детелин Лучев, Десислава Панева-Мариновa, Радослав Павлов Гита Сенка Лилия Павлова

ТАЛАНТЛИВ ПЕДАГОГ И КУЛТУРЕН ДЕЕЦ

Севда Чобанова, Любен Десев

Книжка 4
A CONTINUUM OF APPROACHES TO SCHOOL INSPECTIONS: CASES FROM EUROPE

Rossitsa Simeonova, Yonka Parvanova Martin Brown, Sarah Gardezi, Joe O’Hara, Gerry McNamara Laura del Castillo Blanco Zacharoula Kechri, Eleni Beniata

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2019 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НА БЪДЕЩЕТО

Наталия Витанова

Книжка 7
МОДЕЛ НА РАБОТА В ИНТЕРКУЛТУРНА СРЕДА

(Научноизследователска саморефлексия)

RISK FACTORS FOR EARLY SCHOOL LEAVING IN BULGARIA

Elena Lavrentsova, Petar Valkov

ПРИНОСИ НА ЕЛКА ПЕТРОВА ЗА БЪЛГАРСКОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

(100 години от рождението на проф. д.п.н. Елка Петрова – 27.10.1919 – 21.12.2012)

НАСОКИ ЗА ПРИОБЩАВАНЕ НА МАРГИНАЛНИ СЕМЕЙНИ ОБЩНОСТИ В ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИТЕ ИНСТИТУЦИИ

Нунев, Й. (2019). Насоки за приобщаване на маргинални семейни общности в образователните институции. Велико Търново: Св. св. Кирил и Методий, ISBN 978-619-208-186-7

Книжка 6
ДИОФАНТОВИ УРАВНЕНИЯ И СИСТЕМИ ДИОФАНТОВИ УРАВНЕНИЯ – ТЕОРЕТИЧНИ АСПЕКТИ И МЕТОДИЧЕСКА ПРОЕКЦИЯ В НАЧАЛНИЯ ЕТАП НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Владимира Ангелова. (2018). Диофантови уравнения и системи диофантови уравнения – теоретични аспекти и методическа проекция в начален етап на образование. Пловдив: Паисий Хилендарски, ISBN 978-619-202-394-2

ЕДНА НОВА КНИГА ЗА ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИТЕ УМЕНИЯ НА УЧИТЕЛИТЕ

Николай Колишев. (2018). Теория на педагогическите умения на учителите. София: Захарий Стоянов, ISBN: 9789540912066

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА ИЗСЛЕДОВАТЕЛСКИЯ ПОДХОД ПРИ ОБУЧЕНИЕ НА СТУДЕНТИ ПЕДАГОЗИ

(върху примера на обучение по академичната дисциплина „Съвременни аспекти на гражданското образование“ на студенти педагози)

LEARNING MATURITY

Alina G“mbuță Daniela-Carmen Berințan Marijana Mikulandra Krzysztof Kij Katja Sivka

Книжка 2
ДЕТЕТО И ПЕДАГОГИКАТА

Рашева-Мерджанова, Ян., Петкова, Ил. & Господинов, Вл. (съст.). (2018). Детето и педагогиката. София: Просвета, ISBN 978-954-01-3806-0

Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ КОЛЕГИ,

Редакционната колегия на списание „Педаго- гика“ ви честити Новата 2019 година! Пожела- ваме ви от сърце тя да бъде щастлива, успешна и благословена! През отминалата юбилейна 2018 г. публику- вахме редица стойностни материали на универ- ситетски преподаватели, учители, разнородни специалисти, работещи в сферата на образова- нието, докторанти. Отбелязани бяха поредица от тематични конференции и юбилейни празни- ци. Получихме и международно признание чрез включването на списанието

УЧЕНИЧЕСКО САМОУПРАВЛЕНИЕ

Желязкова-Тея, Т. & Банчева, М. (2018). Ученическото самоуправление. София: Аз-буки. ISBN: 978-619-7065-20-6

2018 година
Книжка 9
ПРАВАТА НА ДЕТЕТО ПРЕЗ ПОГЛЕДА НА СТУДЕНТИ ПЕДАГОЗИ

Йорданка Николова, Даниела Рачева

Книжка 8
СПОДЕЛЕНО МНЕНИЕ

Николова, М. & Михалева, Б. (2018). С увереност срещу агресията и кон-

Книжка 7
РАДОСТТА ОТ ОБЩУВАНЕТО НА ЧУЖД ЕЗИК В ДЕТСТВОТО

Екатерина Софрониева, Христина Белева

НОВО ТЕОРЕТИКО-ПРАКТИЧЕСКО ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА ДЕТСКОТО ТВОРЧЕСТВО

Енгелс-Критидис, Р. (2018). Децата и творчеството. Юбилеен сборник в чест

ПРОФ. Д-Р ЕЛЕНА РУСИНОВА-БАХУДЕЙЛА

Розалина Енгелс-Критидис

Книжка 6
ПОЗИТИВНА УЧЕБНА СРЕДА

Валентина Шарланова

SENIOR CITIZENS’ EXISTENTIAL NEEDS AND EDUCATION FOR THE MEANING OF LIFE

Joanna Łukasik, Norbert Pikuła, Katarzyna Jagielska

Книжка 5
ПЛАНОМЕРНО ПСИХИЧЕСКО РАЗВИТИЕ

(По случай 115 г. от рождението на П.Я. Галперин)

ПАРАДИГМАТА СЕМИОТИКА – ЕЗИК – ДЕТЕ ПРИ 6 – 7-ГОДИШНИТЕ

Жоржетина Атанасова, Любимка Габрова

ПАРАРОДИТЕЛСКАТА ГРИЖА ВЪВ ФОКУСА НА ЕДИН СОЦИАЛНОПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ АНАЛИЗ

Ковачка, Ю. (2017). Социалнопедагогически проблеми при деца с парародителска грижа. Благоевград: УИ „Неофит Рилски“, 144 стр. ISBN: 9789540001340

Книжка 4
ДЕТСКИ КОНФЕРЕНЦИИ

Боряна Иванова

СТЕРЕОТИПИЗАЦИЯ НА ЕТНИЧЕСКИТЕ ВЗАИМООТНОШЕНИЯ ПРИ СЪВРЕМЕННИТЕ МЛАДИ БЪЛГАРИ

Зорница Ганева. (2017). Стереотипизация на етническите взаимоотношения при съвременните млади българи. София: Елестра. ISBN 978-619-7292-03-9

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
СЪВРЕМЕННИ МЕТАМОРФОЗИ НА ВЗАИМООТНОШЕНИЯТА В ДЕТСКАТА ГРУПА

Веселина Иванова, Виолета Кърцелянска-Станчева

SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES AS SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS

Emilj Sulejmani Shikjerije Sulejmani

ОТНОСНО УСЕТА ЗА БРОЕНЕ

Петър Петров, Мима Трифонова

Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ КОЛЕГИ И ПРИЯТЕЛИ,

Редакционната колегия на сп.„Педагогика“ Ви честити Новата 2018 г. Пожелаваме ви тя да бъде здрава, щедра и благословена! Тази година списанието чества своя юбилей – 90 години от неговото публикуване за първи път през 1928 г. с името „Народна просвета“. От деня на създаване до сега, то отразява актуал- ните проблеми на педагогическата наука и прак- тика и остава верен спътник на хиляди научни работници, учители, докторанти. Вярваме, че силата на творческата ни енергия ще пом

ДОБРИ ПРАКТИКИ „ПАРТНЬОРСТВО РОДИТЕЛИ – УЧИЛИЩЕ“

Мехмед Имамов, Калинка Гайтанинчева

2017 година
Книжка 9
ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКОТО УЧЕНИЕ НА Й. ФР. ХЕРБАРТ – ИСТОРИЯ И СЪВРЕМЕННОСТ

(По повод 240 г. от неговото рождение) Невена Филипова

Книжка 8
ЧЕТЯЩИЯТ СТУДЕНТ, ЧЕТЯЩОТО ДЕТЕ – ЕДНО МАЛКО ПРОЗОРЧЕ, ЕДНА ВЕЛИЧЕСТВЕНА ГЛЕДКА

Мариана Мандева, Боряна Туцева, Габриела Николова, Цветелина Ковачева

Книжка 7
ДИДАКТИЧЕСКИ КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТИ

Нели Митева, Наталия Витанова

Илияна Кунева

Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ИЗСЛЕДОВАТЕЛСКО ОБУЧЕНИЕ В АКАДЕМИЧНА СРЕДА

(Научно-теоретична рефлексия) Румяна Неминска

ПРИНОС В ПСИХОЛОГИЯТА НА ТВОРЧЕСТВОТО

(120 години от рождението на Лев Семьонович Виготски) Любен Десев

ЛЕВ СEМЬОНОВИЧ ВИГОТСКИ – ПСИХОЛОГ И НА ХХI ВЕК

(по случай 120 години от рождението му)

ИСКУССТВО В ЖИЗНИ ЛЮДЕЙ

Гульнар Омарова

НОВА И ПОЛЕЗНА КНИГА

Йонка Първанова

ПРИНОСЕН ТРУД КЪМ МЕТОДИКАТА НА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО ПО БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕЗИК И ЛИТЕРАТУРА В НАЧАЛНОТО УЧИЛИЩЕ

М. Мандева (2017). Методика на обучението по български език и литература – I – IV клас. Начално ограмотяване. В. Търново: УИ „Св. св. Кирил и Методий“, 120 стр.

ЕДНО ФУНДАМЕНТАЛНО ИНТЕГРАЛНО ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА РОЛЯТА НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО ЗА РАЗВИТИЕТО НА НООСФЕРНИЯ ИНТЕЛЕКТ

Марга Георгиева, Сава Гроздев. (2016). Морфодинамиката за развитието на ноосферния интелект. София: Изток-Запад, ISBN 978-619-152-869-1

Книжка 4
Книжка 3
СИСТЕМАТИЧНО ВЪВЕДЕНИЕ В ОБЩАТА И ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКАТА СИНЕРГЕТИКА

Любен Десев (2015). Синергетика. Въведение и речник. 777 термина. София: ИК „Екопрогрес“. 464 с. ISBN 978-954-2970-37-8

Книжка 2
ПРОБЛЕМИ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВИ В РАЗВИТИЕТО НА ХУДОЖЕСТВЕНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ У НАС ПРЕЗ ПОГЛЕДА НА ДЕТСКИЯ И НАЧАЛНИЯ УЧИТЕЛ

Теодора Власева, Даниела Гирджева-Валачева, Мария Калоферова, Найден Младенов, Илияна Шотлекова

ЗАКЪСНЯЛО ПРИЗНАНИЕ

Доц. д-р Емилия Николова

Книжка 1
ФАКТОРИ ЗА УСПЕШНО ПРИЛАГАНЕ НА СМЕСЕНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова Лъчезар Лазаров

ЗА СТОПЛЕНИТЕ ПЪТЕКИ КЪМ ЛИТЕРАТУРНОТО ПОЗНАНИЕ

Радев, Радослав. 2015. Технология на методите в обучението по литература. Варна: Славена, 247 с., ISBN 978-619-190-041-1

2016 година
Книжка 9
ИНТЕРАКТИВНИ ТЕХНИКИ ЗА ОВЛАДЯВАНЕ НА ЧЕТЕНЕТО В МУЛТИКУЛТУРНАТА КЛАСНА СТАЯ – ПЪРВИ КЛАС

ФОРМИРАНЕ НА РЕЧЕВА КУЛТУРА, В НАЧАЛНА УЧИЛИЩНА ВЪЗРАСТ, (АНАЛИЗ НА АНКЕТА С УЧИТЕЛИ

Кампания

на Института за български език – БАН, и вестник „Аз-буки“

Книжка 8
Книжка 7
IBM SPSS STATISTICS ПРЕЗ ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИЯ ПОГЛЕД НА ДОЦ. Д-Р ЗОРНИЦА ГАНЕВА

Зорница Ганева (2016). Да преоткрием статистиката с IBM SPSS Statistics. София: Елестра. 712 стр. ISBN 978-619-7292-01-5

НАЧАЛНОТО ОГРАМОТЯВАНЕ – „КЛЮЧ“ ЗА УСПЕШЕН ЖИВОТ В ПРОМЕНЯЩИЯ СЕ СВЯТ

Мариана Мандева, Диляна Гаджева (2016). Начално ограмотяване

ОТ „ЧУДНА И ДИВНА ДАСКАЛЕТИНКА“ ДО ПЕДАГОГИКА ЗА НАЦИОНАЛНО СЛУЧВАНЕ

Виолета Атанасова (2015) Петко Славейков за образованието. Шумен: Унивeрситетско издателство „Епископ Константин Преславски. 208 с. ISBN 978-619-201-051-5

Книжка 6
УЧИЛИЩЕ ЗА ЧЕТЕНЕ

Петя Георгиева

Кампания

на Института за български език – БАН, и в. „Аз Буки“

ДОШЛА ЛИ Е ИНСПЕКТОРЪТ?

Ванина Сумрова

ЩЕ ТЕ ЧАКАМ В/НА ЦЕНТЪРА

Илияна Гаравалова

ПРАВО В ДЕСЕТКАТА

Ивелина Стоянова

ПРОФ.Д.П.Н. СТОЯНКА ЖЕКОВА

Редколегия на сп. „Педагогика“

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
СИНЕРГЕТИКА – НОВО НАУЧНО ПОЗНАНИЕ

(Синергетика – въведение и речник, София: ИК Екопрогрес, 2015 г.)

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
НОВА ДИНАМИЧНА МОДИФИКАЦИЯ В ГРАНИЦИТЕ НА „АЗ-КОНЦЕПЦИЯТА“ НА МАТЕМАТИЧЕСКОТО МОДЕЛИРАНЕ

Марга Георгиева & Сава Гроздев. (2015). Морфодинамиката за развитието на ноосферния интелект, София: Марга Георгиева. 323 стр. ISBN 9786199052204

Книжка 1
IN MEMORIAM

На 10.12.2015 г. ни напусна нашият колега и приятел проф. д-р Иван Пет ков Иванов. Той беше уважаван учен и експерт в областта на педагогическите науки – автор на 10 монографии, 8 учебника, 10 учебни помагала, 6 студии и над 100 статии в специализирани периодич- ни издания и научни сборници; участник в 28 между- народни и национални проекта; председател и член на експертни групи към НАОА, член на редакционната ко- легия на сп. „Педагогика“. Проф. д-р Иван Иванов беше уважаван и оби

2015 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
РУСЕНСКИЯТ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ

Златоживка Здравкова

Книжка 7
ДИСКУСИЯТА В УРОКА ПО ЛИТЕРАТУРА

Огняна Георгиева-Тенева

Книжка 6
УЧИТЕЛЯТ ПРАВИ УЧИЛИЩЕТО

ЕЗИКОВАТА ГРАМОТНОСТ НА МАЛКИЯ УЧЕНИК – „КЛЮЧ“ ЗА ОТГОВОРЕН И УСПЕШЕН ЖИВОТ В ПРОМЕНЯЩИЯ СЕ СВЯТ

ГОТОВНОСТ ЗА ОГРАМОТЯВАНЕ

Екатерина Чернева

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЕ МЕЖДУ ИСТОРИЯ, АКАДЕМИЗЪМ И РЕАЛНИ ПРАКТИКИ В СОЦИАЛНОПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКАТА ДЕЙНОСТ

Академични полета на социалната педагогика, съставител: проф. д.п.н. Клавдия Сапунджиева, научна редакция: проф. дпн Клавдия Сапунджиева, проф. д-р Нели Бояджиева, гл. ас. д-р Марина Пиронкова,

НОВА КНИГА

Клавдия Сапунджиева

Книжка 2
ПРОБЛЕМИ НА СОЦИАЛНАТА АДАПТАЦИЯ НА ПЪТУВАЩИ УЧЕНИЦИ ОТ МАЛКИ НАСЕЛЕНИ МЕСТА1)

Траян Попкочев, Бонка Гергинова, Тереза Карамангалова

Турнир по канадска борба [Arm Wrestling Competition] / Д. Евтимова,

Д. Евтимова, Е. Павлова, И. Радославова и Б. Иванов

Книжка 1
ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: THEORY AND REALITY

Inna Leonidovna Fedotenko

ОТЗИВ ЗА КНИГАТА „ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЕН ДИЗАЙН (КОНЦЕПТУАЛНИ ОСНОВАНИЯ И ПРАКТИЧЕСКИ РЕШЕНИЯ)“

Димова, Д. (2013). Образователен дизайн (концептуални основания

2014 година
Книжка 9
„СОФИЯ – УЧЕЩ СЕ ГРАД“ – МОБИЛЕН СЕМИНАР В ПОДКРЕПА НА НЕФОРМАЛНОТО УЧЕНЕ И ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ В ОБЩНОСТТА

ПЕТЪР ДЪНОВ (БЕИНСÀ ДУНÒ Е И БЕЛЕЖИТ, ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ МИСЛИТЕЛ-ХУМАНИСТ, (ПО ПОВОД НА 0-ГОДИШНИНАТА ОТ РОЖДЕНИЕТО, И 70 ГОДИНИ ОТ КОНЧИНАТА МУ

НА УЧИЛИЩЕ – С УСМИВКА!

Снежана Якимова

НА УЧИЛИЩЕ – С УСМИВКА!

Снежана Якимова

УЧИТЕЛЯТ – ЕТАЛОН ЗА ФОРМИРАНЕ НА ДЕТСКАТА ЛИЧНОСТ

Катя Коруджийска, Янка Маринкова

Книжка 8
Книжка 7
ЗАЕДНО МОЖЕМ ПОВЕЧЕ

Диана Смиленова

Книжка 6
УСПЕШНИЯТ УЧИТЕЛ – МЕЖДУ ПРОФЕСИОНАЛНАТА НОРМА И СТРАСТТА ДА ПРЕПОДАВАШ

Проф. д-р Ангел Петров е преподавател по методика на обучението по български език в СУ „Св. Климент Охридски“. Ръководител е на най- старата катедра по методика на филологически- те дисциплини в страната – Катедрата по ме-

Книжка 5
ВЪЗГЛЕДИТЕ НА ЖАН-ЖАК РУСО И ЛЮБЕН КАРАВЕЛОВ ЗА ВЪЗПИТАНИЕТО

Посвещава се на 180-ата годишнина от рождението на Любен Каравелов (1834 – 1879) Виолета Атанасова

LE PROJET PÉDAGOGIQUE, SOURCE DE MOTIVATION DANS L’ENSEIGNEMENT ET L’APPRENTISSAGE DU FLE

THE EDUCATIONAL PROJECT, MEANS OF MOTIVATION IN TEACHING AND LEARNING FLE

LA PÉDAGOGIE DU PROJET ET LA MOTIVATION DES ÉLÈVES POUR L’APPRENTISSAGE DU FRANÇAIS

PROJECT PEDAGOGY AND PUPILS’ MOTIVATION IN LEARNING FRENCH

Книжка 4
КАЖДЫЙ ДЛЯ МЕНЯ УЧИТЕЛЬ

Ш.А.Амонашвили

Книжка 3
АНТОАНЕТА ЙОВЧЕВА (1952 – 2014)

След трудна борба с тежката болест ни напусна един добър и мил човек, една светла личност – Анто- анета Йовчева, нашата обичана колежка Тони. Нейните колеги и приятели, многобройните автори и сътрудници на сп. „Начално образование“ и на сп. „Педагогика“ ще запазят завинаги спомена за нейната приветлива усмивка, за нейната отзивчивост и преда- ност към работата, за нейната широка култура и стре- меж към познание, към развитие. Родена на 20 март 1952 г. в София в интелигентно се- мей

Книжка 2
ПОСТМОДЕРНИЗЪМ И ВЪЗПИТАНИЕ

Клавдия Сапунджиева

ДЕТСКИ УНИВЕРСИТЕТИ

Боряна Иванова

ПРОФ. Д-Р ЕЛКА ПЕТРОВА

Има личности, в сиянието на които се оглеж- дат цяла плеада последователи, възпитаници, колеги; има личности, без които животът става по беден, дните по-еднообразни, защото в сър- цето остава празно място. Такава личност е професор, доктор на педа- гогическите науки Елка Петрова – най–големият ерудит в областта на предучилищното възпита - ние, учен с международно значение. Дълги години ще свеждаме глави пред нейна- та обаятелна личност, с искрена признателност ще си спомняме свидните

МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЙ ЦЕНТР ГУМАННОЙ ПЕДАГОГИКИ

Международният център „Хуманна педагогика“ организира XIII педаго- гически четения в периода 20 – 23.03.2014 г. в гр.Тбилиси, Грузия. Форумът се организира със съдействието на грузинското правителство. „Учителят“ е темата, която ще обедини участниците: учители, експерти, родители, универ- ситетски преподаватели, представители на педагогическата общност от мно- го страни, за да се осъществи дискусия за мисията на съвременния учител в съвременния образователен контекст. Ръководството на

Книжка 1
ОСНОВНИ ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКИ НА МОБИЛНОТО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова Лъчезар Лазаров

2013 година
Книжка 9
УЧИТЕЛИ ВЪЗРОЖДЕНЦИ В ТЪРНОВО

Венка Кутева-Цветкова

Книжка 8
ДИМИТЪР ДОНЧЕВ – С ВЪЗХИТА ЗА БЪЛГАРСКИЯ УЧИТЕЛ

100 ГОДИНИ ОТ РОЖДЕНИЕТО НА ДИМИТЪР ЕВСТАТИЕВ ДОНЧЕВ (5.10.1913 – 15.02.1997)

Книжка 7
„СЛЪНЦЕТО“ НА ВЪЗПИТАТЕЛНАТА СИСТЕМА В ТВУ – РАКИТОВО

85 ГОДИНИ ОТ РОЖДЕНИЕТО НА АНГЕЛ УЗУНОВ (1928 – 1999)

ЦЕННОСТИ И ДУХОВНО-НРАВСТВЕНО РАЗВИТИЕ НА МАЛКИЯ УЧЕНИК

Марияна Ешкенази, Гергана Фиданова, Марияна Вишева, Цветанка Годжилова

МАЛКИЯТ УЧЕНИК ЧЕТЕ

Марияна Механджиева Венета Велева

С БАБА И ДЯДО В КЛАС

Цветелин Горанов, Таня Илиева, Цветанка Берова, Нели Иванова, Борка Бончева

РОД РОДА НЕ ХРАНИ, НО ТЕЖКО МУ, КОЙТО ГО НЯМА!

Диляна Вачкова Евелина Димитрова

ДА ПОМОГНЕМ НА ДЕЦАТА ДА ОТВОРЯТ СЪРЦАТА СИ

Иванка Дебелушина Нина Маврикова

ДОБРОТО Е У ВСЕКИ

Мария Наскова

ОТЛИЧЕН ПЕДАГОГ, ПСИХОЛОГ И ПСИХОТЕРАПЕВТ

ДОЦ. СВЕТОСЛАВ СТАМЕНОВ (1939 – 2013)

Книжка 6
ТЕОРЕТИКО-ПРИЛОЖНИ ПРОБЛЕМИ НА КОНСТРУИРАНЕТО НА ТЕСТ ЗА НАЦИОНАЛНО ВЪНШНО ОЦЕНЯВАНЕ ПО „ЧОВЕКЪТ И ОБЩЕСТВОТО“ ЗА 4. КЛАС (2013)

Ваня Петрова, Цонка Каснакова, Мариан Делчев Жана Минчева Радостина Стоянова, Рада Димитрова Мария Темникова

MEDIA IN PRESCHOOL AGE OF CHILD’S LIFE

Sonja Petrovska Jadranka Bocvarova

Книжка 5
ШАЛВА АЛЕКСАНДРОВИЧ АМОНАШВИЛИ – УЧИТЕЛ ОТ БЪДЕЩЕТО

В сложното битие на науката и метамор- фозите на социалната реалност, неотменими и общовалидни остават само най-стойностни- те постижения и безспорни истини, които не само маркират и остойностяват територията на човешко познание, но извисяват самия чо- век, поддържат неговата вяра в доброто, под- хранват чувството му за собствена значимост, укрепват неговия дух. Приемайки извечните послания на класи- ческата философско-педагогическа мъдрост и дълбоко обвързан с педагогическата р

МАНИФЕСТ ГУМАННОЙ ПЕДАГОГИКИ

Преамбула 25 лет тому назад группа учителей новаторов провозгласила манифест „Пе- дагогика сотрудничества“ (Переделкино, 1986 год). В последующие годы были опубликованы отчеты встреч учителей новаторов, в которых рассматри- вались разные аспекты педагогики сотрудничества: „Демократизация лично- сти“ (Цинандали, Телавский район, Грузия, 1987 год), „Методика обновления“ (Москва, 1988 год), „Войдем в новую школу“ (Краснодарский край, 1988 год). Идеи педагогики сотрудничества воодушевленно

ПОРТФОЛИОТО НА УЧЕНИКА КАТО ПРОЦЕС НА САМОПОЗНАНИЕ

Радка Топалска Емилия Вълкова, Албена Атанасова

ДОПИРНИ СВЕТОВЕ

Албена Димитрова Стилияна Гронева

ПРЕДИ ГОДИНА И СЕГА

Веселка Аршинкова

Книжка 4
СВЕЩЕНИК ГЕОРГИ МАРИНОВ ПОЛУГАНОВ – ОСНОВАТЕЛЯТ НА УЧИЛИЩЕТО И ПЪРВИЯТ УЧИТЕЛ В ПОЛИКРАЙЩЕ

Георги Георгиев Трифонка Попниколова Марияна Георгиева–Гроссе

ЕВРОПЕЙСКИ ПРИКАЗКИ

Светла Попова

Книжка 3
ДА ОПАЗИМ ДЕТСКОТО ЗДРАВЕ!

Мая Топалова, Симона Пейчева

КАК ДА ОТГЛЕДАМЕ МАЛЪК ПРИРОДОЛЮБИТЕЛ?

Мадлена Николова Ани Цветкова

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
ИЗКУСТВОТО ЗА ПРЕВЕНЦИЯ НА АГРЕСИВНОТО ПОВЕДЕНИЕ НА ДЕЦАТА

Евгения Миланова Виолета Николова Величка Радева

ПРИЯТЕЛСТВОТО В ЖИВОТА НА ДЕТЕТО

Даниела Димитрова Красимира Василева

ПРЕДАЙ НАТАТЪК

Вилдан Мехмедова

ЗАЕДНО ДА БЪДЕМ ДОБРИ

(ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКА СИТУАЦИЯ В ПОДГОТВИТЕЛНА ГРУПА)

ПРОФ. ДПН EЛКА ПЕТРОВА EДНА НЕЗАЛИЧИМА СЛЕДА В БЪЛГАРСКОТО ПРЕДУЧИЛИЩНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ (1919 – 2012)

Почина проф. дпн Елка Петрова (20.ХІІ.2012 г.) – на- шата любима учителка по изкуството да се живее пъл- ноценно и професионално, създателката на науката за предучилищното възпитание на българските деца, пре- красната жена и велика майка, Неповторима, единствена, съвършена – това е нашата Елка: Примерът за всички нас – хилядите нейни студенти и последователи ! Елка Петрова винаги е първа, винаги е оригинална и авангардна; през 1950–1952 г. поставя началото на Висшия мето

2012 година
Книжка 9
ПЕДАГОГЪТ – РИЦАР НА ДЕТСТВОТО

Януш Корчак бе написал, че животът на великите хора е като легендите: труден, но красив. И се оказва пророчески прав, сякаш е писал за себе си! Наследник на семейство с богата духовна култура и традиции, останал отрано без баща, той не просто се справя с несгодите на сирачеството, но развива у себе си три могъщи извора на живот: любов към свободата и справедливостта, страст към знанието и творчеството, отдаденост на децата и тяхното щастие. Лекарят Корчак лекува децата и душите им. Безплатн

ЯНУШ КОРЧАК – ВЕЛИК ХУМАНИСТ И ПЕДАГОГ

„Със сила и мощ поведох своя живот, който беше привидно неподреден, самотен и чужд. За син избрах идеята да служа на детето и неговото дело. Привидно загубих.“ Бе лекар, писател, мислител. Бе философ, учен, моралист. Издател. Възпи- тател и педагог. Бе герой. Бе скромен. Във всяка от тези области той има изключителни постижения. В течение на по- вече от четиридесет години работи като педагог и писател. Четиридесет години безкористно служене на слабите и беззащитните. Създава съвременна кон

ЕВОЛЮЦИЯ НА ПРАВАТА НА ДЕТЕТО

„Детето има право на сериозно отношение към проблемите му, на справедливото им решаване.“

THE KORCZAK’S RIGHT TO SOCIAL PARTICIPATION OF CHILDREN THE CITIZENSHIP OF CHILDREN

A speech by Marek Michalak, the Ombudsman for Children, given during the seminar„The Polish-Israeli pioneer in the fi eld of human rights, Janusz Korczak (1879–1942) and today’s Convention on Children’s Rights as the part of the international law“, Geneva, the 6 of June 2009

ЗА ДЕТЕТО, ДЕТСТВОТО ИЛИ НАУКА ЗА НЕГО?

В памет на Януш Корчак – по повод 70 г. от неговата смърт и 100 г. от създаването на „Дом за сираци“ във Варшава Албена Чавдарова

Книжка 8
CHANGES IN UNIVERSITY TEACHING – THE ROAD FROM KNOWLEDGE TO COMPETENCIES

Slađana Anđelković Zorica Stanisavljević Petrović

ДОСТОЕН ЖИВОТ, ОТДАДЕН НА ПРОСВЕЩЕНИЕТО… ПРОФ. СТОЙКА ЗДРАВКОВА – ЕДИН СЪВРЕМЕНЕН БУДИТЕЛ НА 70 ГОДИНИ

Неуморна и взискателна! Енергична и всеотдай- на! Работохолик и перфекционист! Това е проф. д-р Стойка Здравкова! Не е за вярване, че в началото на ноември 2012 година навърши 70 години. И не е слу- чайно това, че тази светла дата е непосредствено бли- зо до Деня на будителите. А това, че проф . Здравкова е съвременен български будител, е толкова безспорно и видимо! 70–годишнината ù е един чудесен повод ретрос- пективно да си припомним и проследим най-значи-

Книжка 7
ОЧАКВАНА И ПОЛЕЗНА

Емилия Василева

Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ЦЕННО ПОМАГАЛО ЗА ПСИХОЛОЗИ И ПЕДАГОЗИ (Надежден инструмент за диагностициране смисъла на живота)

Любен Десев Минчев, Борис. Тест на Дж. Крумбъг и Л. Махолик за смисъл в живота. Българска версия. Варна, ВСУ „Черноризец Храбър“,

ГЕОРГИ MАВРОВ ЖИВОТ, ОТДАДЕН НА НАУКАТА И ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Така най-общо, но и най-точно можем да охарак- теризираме дейността на ст. н. с. д-р Георги Петков Мавров. Той ни напусна неочаквано в края на април т.г. И до последния си ден не преставаше да се вълнува от проблемите на образованието. Споделяше инте- ресни мисли относно предстоящото приемане на За- кона за образованието. Пестелив на думи, но щедър на дела – това ясно проличава от неговата богата би- ография.

Книжка 4
ОЩЕ ЕДНА ИДЕЯ

Галина Стоянова

Книжка 3
С ИНОВАТИВЕН ПОГЛЕД КЪМ ЛИЧНОСТТА НА ДЕТЕТО

Маргарита Абрашева Любимка Габрова

БИЗНЕС ОБУЧЕНИЕ В ДЕТСКАТА ГРАДИНА

Красимира Костова Петя Драгоданова

ДЕТСКАТА БЕЗОПАСНОСТ

Любимка Габрова

БАБА ПРИКАЗКИ РАЗКАЗВА... (МИКС ОТ ПРИКАЗКИ)

Кева Захариева, Мария Мичева

Книжка 2
ДЕТЕ ПЪТУВА В АВТОМОБИЛА

Красимира Михайлова

ПРОТИВОПОСТАВЯНЕ

Пюрвя Ердниев, Б. Ердниев

ЗДРАВКА НОВАКОВА – ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛ И ТВОРЕЦ

Седемдесетгодишният юбилей е вълнуващ повод да проследим трудния, богат и съдържателен професионално-творчески път на доц. д-р Здравка Новакова, да под- чертаем нейната важна роля за утвърждаване на дидактика на математиката като

IN MEMORIAM Иван Марев

Напусна ни проф. Иван Марев – философ, педагог, демократ, родолюбец. В далечната 1975 г., зареден с енергия, пълен с идеи, той създаде в Техническия

Книжка 1
ДЕЛЕГИРАНЕ НА ПРАВА ЧРЕЗ КОМИСИИТЕ В ДЕТСКАТА ГРАДИНА

Маргарита Абрашева Политиката, наречена управление на качеството, не е самоцел, нито поредна обра- зователна „мода“. Тя е практически необходима за поддържане от директора на учеб- ното заведение на един привлекателен образ в условията на конкуренция на пазара на учебни заведения. Това се отнася най-вече за детските градини. Политиката на упра- вление на качеството съдържа недостатъчно използван ресурс, включително за спечел- ване и запазване доверието на потребителя – родителите на децата,

ИНОВАЦИОННИ И ИНТЕРАКТИВНИ МЕТОДИ В КВАЛИФИКАЦИОННАТА ДЕЙНОСТ НА ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИЯ КОЛЕКТИВ

Стоилка Ташева, Севда Лукайчева Развиващото се с динамични темпове общество в днешно време налага необ- ходимостта от иновационни промени в областта на образованието. И в предучи- лищната педагогика все по-често се търсят алтернативни педагогически техноло- гии както за възпитанието и обучението на децата, така и при провеждането на квалификационната дейност на самите педагози. Използването на интерактивните методи дава възможност да се възлагат за- дачи, които предполагат съвместна работа,

ТОВА ТРЯБВА ДА ГО ЗНАЕ ВСЯКО ДЕТЕ

Татяна Атанасова, Иванка Пампова

НА УЛИЦАТА Е ОПАСНО

Таня Янчева, Зоя Кацарова