Педагогика

2020/4, стр. 487 - 506

A CONTINUUM OF APPROACHES TO SCHOOL INSPECTIONS: CASES FROM EUROPE

Резюме:

Ключови думи:

Rossitsa Simeonova, Yonka Parvanova
Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski” (Bulgaria)

Martin Brown, Sarah Gardezi, Joe O’Hara, Gerry McNamara
Dublin City University (Ireland)

Laura del Castillo Blanco
Regional Government of the Autonomous Community of Extremadura (Spain)

Zacharoula Kechri, Eleni Beniata
Ministry of Education and Religious Aairs (Greece)

Introduction

Prevailing school inspection systems in Europe have evolved tremendously over the last decade depending on the societal (feedback) and decision making needs across the countries. Systems have been striving to achieve a balance and cohesion across different mechanisms that have developed over time to meet the demands and expectations of stakeholders working within schools and in the wider school community. However, there are two dominating approaches to school inspection across Europe which represent two ends of a kind of school inspection continuum: namely high stakes, sanctions oriented inspection and low stakes advisory inspection. There are several factors that tend to position each system on this continuum including governance arrangements, statutory powers of the inspectorate, roles and responsibilities of the school inspectors as in the legislation; the forms and frequency of inspection visits, level of emphasis on school self-evaluation (SSE) and action planning for improvement and availability of support services for the schools (NIAR). Every inspection system has a varied combination of these mechanisms that defines its character and helps to place that system on the inspection approach continuum.

The paper at hand aims to present a comparative analysis of the inspection systems of four countries – Bulgaria, Ireland, Greece and Extremadura (one of the autonomous communities in Spain henceforward will be referred to as Spain) – on the basis of the above mentioned factors. The purpose of the study is to explore the extent to which each inspection system is tilted towards one end of the continuum or the other. The paper commences with a review of literature to determine the dominant trends that shape the current systems of school inspection, the various tasks and activities that inspectors are generally involved in and the level and forms of support offered by the inspectorates.

Methodology

The overarching methodology used in this study is desk research grounded in an evidence-based qualitative analysis of the key source documents regarding school evaluation policies and practices in these four countries. Document analysis may serve multiple purposes but mainly it provides information about the background of the research as well as verification of findings from other sources (Bowen, 2009). Bowen sums up the overall concept of document analysis as a process of “evaluating documents in such a way that empirical knowledge is produced and understanding is developed” (2009).We employed thematic as well as direct analysis of the text to access the literal and surface meaning (Punch, 2005) using O’ Leary’s (2014) two major techniques: Interview technique and content analysis. In interview technique, a researcher uses text as a respondent or informant. The researcher asks questions and then explores answers in the text for document analysis while in content analysis, the researcher notes use of particular words, phrases and concepts. The information gathered through the documents is organised according to the following themes: governance arrangements for inspectorates, statutory powers of inspectorates, the roles and responsibilities of school inspectors, forms and frequency of inspection visits, emphasis on self-evaluation and improvement planning and availability of support services for the schools. To ensure authenticity and reliability of the data and to form overarching themes for the analysis, documents of government and regional education bodies are consulted.

Based on the afore mentioned themes each national research team has prepared a country specific report on the role and responsibilities of inspectorates of education in the light of their legislation and regulations.

Literature Review

The global spread of neoliberalism has changed the way governments control the public services including education and laid emphasis on the decentralization of power to give autonomy to school to take decisions for the optimum allocation of resources and ensure better learning outcomes. Moreover, after the European economic crisis of 2008 improvement in educational standards has emerged as the fastest driver of economic productivity and competitiveness (Baxter & Hult, 2017; Brown et al., 2016). Therefore, there is a widely perceived need for quality assurance systems that retain traditional ‘regulatory rigour’ whilst leading to academic excellence through school improvement in the shortest possible time (Baxter & Hult, 2017).

A wide range of approaches to school inspection are in operation across Europe, as inspection is, according to Clark (2017), a ‘critical weapon in the armoury of states’ that allows the governments to maintain control of Educational provision from a distance. Brown et al. (2018) however, identify two distinct camps. On one end, there are inspectorates driven by reliance on hard data, concerned primarily with monitoring and accountability and imposing sanctions on schools not meeting standards e.g. Ofsted, Swedish School Inspectorate and Netherlands Inspectorate of Education. On the other end, we have models of school inspection that are ‘more focussed on a variety of data sources, interested in school self-evaluation and more concerned with collaborative improvement’ as in Scotland and some parts of Central and Eastern Europe. These contrasting approaches, with most other systems situated somewhere between them, represent two ends of the continuum of school inspections regimes: high stakes sanctions oriented inspection and low stakes advisory inspection.

The strength of both approaches to school inspection is determined by the degree of presence of several features such as, governance arrangements, statutory powers of inspectorate, role and responsibilities of the school inspectors as in the legislation; the forms and frequency of the inspection visits, level of emphasis on school self-evaluation and improvement planning; and availability of support services for the schools1). The varying combination of these features contribute towards the accountability pressure (Altrichter & Kemethofer, 2015) and make them either high or low stake inspection.

Inspection of education, as Ozga et al. (2013) explain, is a governing practice and inspectors are viewed as policy implementers and shapers (Baxter, 2017; Barber, 2004). With such a significant profile and role, a key question is who governs and leads the inspectorate. For the governance of inspectorates a range of different models are prevailing internationally; in some countries for example, Australia, Denmark and Ireland it is under the auspices of the Ministry of Education while in some, the inspectorate is an autonomous body reporting directly to the parliament as in England where Ofsted is a non-ministerial government department reporting to Parliament. Likewise, ERO in New Zealand is a school evaluation department outside the Ministry of Education. Barber (2004) asserts that an inspection system independent of government is most effective as it allows government to be held to account, in addition to the education service itself, whereas, when the inspectorate of Education is situated within the Ministry of Education there is a strong likelihood of conflict of interest and inspectors’ valid reporting on the education policies may get diluted. In countries where inspectorates operate outside of the ambit of Ministry of Education relish greater autonomy and probably more objectivity exists.

The authority that tasks the inspectorate with the responsibility for governance of Education is streamlined in every country through legislation. The statutory powers of inspectorates usually include that inspectors can enter schools, early childhood and other educational services and are entitled to receive such information as they consider necessary for the purpose of inspection. Working for any inspectorate puts the school inspectors in ‘a position of influence’2) and confers upon them ‘enforcement powers’ and ‘powers to inspect’ (Ofsted, 2009)3). The Education Review Officers Code of Conduct2) maintains that ‘Review Officers are statutory officers designated under Part 28 of the Education Act 1989, and they exercise powers of entry, investigation and reporting through the various sections of that Part of the Act’. Similar statutory powers are stated in the inspectors Code of Practice, DES (Ireland) (2015).4)

An Inspector shall have all such powers as are necessary or expedient for the purpose of performing his or her functions and shall be accorded every reasonable facility and co-operation by the board and the staff of a school or centre for education.

A person who obstructs or interferes with an Inspector in the course of exercising a power conferred on the Inspector by this section or impedes the exercise by the Inspector of such a power commits an offence and is liable – to conviction and fine4).

The regulations for inspectorate not only define the powers vested in them, their various sections also describe the roles and responsibilities of the inspectors as well. The role and function of the inspectorate as an agent for accountability and improvement has changed considerably since its inception which dates back to the 19th century (Brown, McNamara and O’Hara, 2016b). Nevertheless, there are certain features that are common in almost all inspectorate to a lesser or greater extent such as, setting standards and quality criteria for school inspections; evaluating schools by gathering evidence while onsite and making use of the information about students achievement; producing school inspection reports highlighting strengths and areas for improvement and giving recommendations; and encouraging schools to engagge in self-evaluation to complement the findings of external inspection and develop targetted school improvement plans (Brown, McNamara & O’Hara, 2016a; Brown et al., 2016b; Brown, 2013).

As per their inspection regulations various inspectorates, being the largest depositories of empirical data, involve school inspectors in a number of other tasks over and above the one mentioned above. In many countries, inspectors review curriculum and syllabus and contribute towards curricuclum development and are responsible for teachers’ accreditation and monitor in-service training. The supervision of test and examinations and the development and maintenance of a database related on the education system are also included in their professional repertoire. The overarching findings published in national or Chief Inspectors’ Reports may become national priorities thereby stretching the role of school inspectors from policy implementers to policy shapers.

In most of the inspectorates there is now a greater emphasis on ‘school selfevaluation (SSE) as requisite part of the inspection and school improvement process’ (Macbeath, 2006; Nevo, 2001). Even in the high stakes inspection systems such as Ofsted, SSE is regarded as a part of the school’s continuous review and improvement process (Ofsted, 2009). This is a means of giving autonomy to schools to evaluate their performance either against their National Standards or the criteria defined by the inspectorates and to set targets for their improvement. In this way, the evaluation function is given to the school with external evaluation taking the shape of inspecting schools’ approaches to evaluation (OECD). In many countries, schools are bound by regulation to carryout SSE and prepare action plans for school improvement e.g. Australia, Scotland and Ireland while there are countries where self –evaluation is not a requirement such as Greece, Italy and Mexico (NAIR) though action planing for improvement is obligatory. In instances where inspectorates prescribe tools and templates for SSE and action planning, they maintain a controlling influence on school practices.

All inspection frameworks or codes of practice allude to ‘support for schools’ through quality feedback, both verbal and written to all the stakeholders.

‘One of the central ways in which we evaluate, advise and support is by visiting and conducting inspections in schools … We disseminate, through discussion and publication, the findings of our evaluations and we publish advice as to how the work of education providers and the learning of pupils/students can be improved‘ (DES).

Inspectorates have developed support materials as well as guidelines for schools to carry out self-evaluation for example, Eective Internal Evaluation for Improvement5), Looking at Our School6) and How Good is Our School 7). The dedicated websites of inspectorates have all relevant tools, guidelines and publications that help schools to understand the expectations and inspection practices as well as give them access to national reports to raise their awareness about the research and innovation in education in their country. Further, as in Ireland and the UK, the inspectorates make recommendations to professional development services for teachers in the country to update their in-service training programmes in light of inspection findings.

Inspection frameworks and websites provide comprehensive information about the forms and frequency of the inspections visits. In almost all OECD countries evaluations by school inspectorates tend to be required every three to five years. The frequency of visits depends on the types of schools covered; there may be different return cycles for primary or secondary schools. Most OECD countries have regulations that require lower secondary schools to be inspected regularly which implies assuring quality of education provision long before students actually sit for any standardised assessment.

Based on purpose, there are several forms of school inspections but the most common are cyclical, subject inspections, incidental, differentiated or follow through and thematic. The differentiated inspections are characterised by ‘targeting inspection resources to potentially failing schools’based on the findings of analysis of documents, previous inspection reports, and/or student achievement results (including selfevaluation documentation) submitted to the Inspectorate (Erhen et al., 2015). There is a big debate about the utility of differentiated inspection in school improvement which is beyond the scope of this paper but it is worth noting that, as compared to cyclical inspection differentiated inspections put more “accountability pressure” on schools because they expose them to potentially being subjected to ‘special measures’ (Altrichter & Kemethofer, 2015). In contrast, thematic inspections do not put pressure on individual schools as they are concerned with the broad topics of teaching and schooling such as use of ICT in classrooms or the effectiveness of inclusive education in schools. Incidental or without notice inspections can be very stressful for schools and are predominantly supervisory in nature.

Regardless of its form, school inspections are consequential (Altrichter & Kemethofer, 2015). In the case of schools that are above the threshold level, inspection may simply re-orientate their school improvement endeavours but for the low performing schools it may result in sanctions. These sanctions can range between increased inspection visits, financial fines and in very adverse cases, withdrawal of school license, teacher or headteacher suspension or removal or even school closure.

The next section of the paper provides a review of the prevailing inspection systems in Bulgaria, Ireland, Greece and Spain in the context of the features that help place any system on the continuum of approaches to school inspection.

Findings

Governance arrangements

In all four countries, the management structure and mechanisms of school inspections vary greatly. School inspectors were introduced in Bulgaria for the first time in 1878 as officials, subordinated to the Secretary of Education, were made responsible for executing control, external evaluation and support of schools and teachers in respective regions of the country. School inspection and supervision has been changed with the new Preschool and School Education Act)8) introduced in 2016 and some of its elements are still developing. Inspection has become a part of ‘quality management’ of the education system. A new body has been established – the National Inspectorate of Education, subordinated to the Council of Ministers, instead of the Secretary of Education. With this new regulation, the National Inspectorate has emerged as a powerful regulatory authority.

For varying reasons such as the demographics of Ireland, and unlike other countries such as Austria and Spain, there are no regional level inspectorates in Ireland. All decisions relating to the role, function, management and administration of inspection together with associated evaluation frameworks are implemented at a national level under the patronage of the Department of Education and Skills (DES).

The inspection of schools in Greece mainly through the evaluation of teachers ceased in 1982 when the institution of the "Inspectors" was replaced by “School Advisors” (Law 1304/82). However, the Ministry of Education, Research and Religious Affairs (MERRA) which is the national policy maker in education planning and the Institute of Educational Policy (IEP) that works under MERRA, plans and organizes programmes for school improvement at a national level, announced a new Law 4547/126-20189) in 2018 about the decentralization of the educational system. In the first phase of the implementation of this law, there are now Regional Centers of Educational Support ("PEKES") run by Regional Directors of Education (PDE). Every Regional Center of Educational Support (“PEKES”) will have the Coordinators of Educational Work (former School Inspectors/Advisors), who have to facilitate the implementation of the national educational policy as decided by the MERRA and recommended by the IEP and participate in the evaluation process of schools10). However, this new policy is still in the process of settling down, but one point is clear, namely, that regulation and school inspection is to be regionalized and run by the PDE.

In the case of Spain, the Ministry of Education has overall responsibility for education at national level. The Department of Education and Employment (Consejer‘a de Educaci–n y Empleo), as part of the regional government, is responsible for regulating and implementing education and training in each region. The Inspectorate of Education’s functions, responsibilities and main organizational procedures are described in the Education Acts for autonomous communities.

Statutory powers of inspectorate

In Bulgaria the Regulations for kindergartens and schools’ inspection11), issued by the Secretary of Education and enforced in December 2016 specifies that ‘the aim of the inspection is to determine the level of accomplishment of the state educational standards and to formulate an evaluation of the strengths of the educational institutions’ activities and of the aspects that need improvement’. It is stated that inspection consists of three interrelated activities: 1) gathering information about school’s or kindergarten’s activities based on specific indicators; 2) evaluation – comparing gathered data with the criteria set by the National Inspectorate;

3) support – providing recommendations for improvement of inspected schools or kindergartens. Former Regional inspectorates of education (RIE)12) are transformed into Regional departments of education (RDE) and their authority and functions do not differ significantly to the ones RIE have previously had. They have supportive and control functions over the schools in the region, providing support for implementation of guidelines for improvement provided by the National inspectorate or other relevant governing bodies. This regulation also gives power and authority to the inspectors to enter a school, observe its operations and review documents.

In the case of Ireland, with the implementation of the Education Act of 1998 (Government of Ireland), inspectors were given a legislatively defined function: ‘The functions of an Inspector shall be: to support and advise recognised schools, centres for education and teachers on matters relating to the provision of education…’ – Government of Ireland, Education Act, 1998, section 13 (3). By law, an inspector has all such powers as are necessary to extract information about how well teaching and learning is organised in the school and the quality of school leadership and management and curriculum provision and shall be accorded every reasonable facility and cooperation by the schoolboard and staff. During the course of inspection, inspector(s) will talk to staff, the board of management, students and parents, will attend classes and look into school documents and students’ work. The results of the visit will then be written up and discussed with the school, after being presented to the relevant stakeholders. The results are published on the DES website13).

In Greece, the current Law 4547/12-6-201814), has introduced a regionalized supervisory and support system through PEKES and the Educational Coordinators who will participate in the evaluation process of the work of school units but there is not much clarity as yet about the statutory powers of the inspectorate. However, while detailing the roles and responsibilities of the Coordinators of Education Work it is mentioned that they will provide the necessary tools and expertise to schools and towards the end of the year send to the schools the assessment reports stressing the fields to be improved and give recommendations for school improvement as well as CPD for teachers. From this, it can be assumed that this law allows them to visit schools and observe teaching and learning and carry out document scrutiny. According to a UNESCO Report (2017) in Greek educational reality there are neither 'standards' to be achieved nor inspections being carried out. In addition, the collection of educational data is rather uninsightful and slow. The publication of educational statistics is something that takes place occasionally. Therefore, only once this law is fully enforced can the new statutory powers of the inspectorate be implemented, and their effectiveness assessed.

The Organic Law of Education15) in Spain provides a general legal framework for the Inspectorate, detailing its aims, functions and powers, but models of organisation and operation are quite different in the autonomous communities and outside the control of the Ministry of Education. In Extremadura, the Inspectorate of Education’s functions, responsibilities and main organizational procedures are detailed in the Extremadura Education Act16). This establishes that Inspection shall contribute to education quality and equity improvement. The Inspectorate by law is required to participate in the evaluation of the education system and, in particular, in actions by the Agency of educational evaluation of Extremadura in the terms determined by regulation. The inspectorate ensures compliance with the standing provisions and the principles and values of the education system. The Corps of Inspectors according to the Education Act has a dual function: to oversee the activities in schools, to which they have free access, and to examine and assess academic, pedagogical and administrative documentation and to interview anyone in the school, including the management team, teaching staff, students and parents.

The roles of Inspectors as defined in legislation

The National Inspectorate in Bulgaria was established in mid – 2018, under the Regulation No 15/8.12.2016 for Inspection of kindergartens and schools, and has developed and tested inspection criteria17). In the Preschool and school education act, inspection is defined as a ‘process of developing a total, independent expert evaluation of the quality of education a kindergarten or a school provides at a certain time of its activity and defining guidelines for improvement’. The definition refers only to assuring accountability and does not mention if inspection has a function in supporting school improvement. However, it is expected that the National Inspectorate will provide clear guidelines for school improvement and regional departments of education will support schools in their implementation in practice.

Regulations for the structure and functions of the regional departments of education18) issued by the Ministry of Education and enforced in February 2017, describe the role of the Regional Departments of Education (RDE) as regional bodies of the Ministry of Education. The term ‘inspection’ does not appear anywhere in the document, instead it refers to control and checks but this appears to mean members of RDE will have rights to entry and investigation in schools. While the suspended Quality management regulations No. 16/8.12.201619) gives the details about school improvement planning and the role of self-evaluation in this. The RDE, as mentioned above, has an important role in monitoring and supporting schools’ self-evaluation and improvement planning. Schools are expected to decide development strategy and prepare a 2-year action plan which are supposed to be accepted by school’s Pedagogical council and approved by the school Community Council (parental body for civic control and supervision of school management). School improvement measures need to address the guidelines provided to the school by the National Inspectorate after total inspection.

After the promulgation of Education Act 1998 (Ireland), the school inspectors’ fundamental role has been to support and advise schools however, with the changing trends in educational supervision, the demands on their advisory role has grown dramatically. For example, in 2012 DES Circular Nos. 0040/201220) and 0039/201221) required all priamry and post-primary schools to conduct self-evaluations starting in the academic year 2012/2013. Moreover, the process of SSE was also to be in accordance with the inspectorate-devised SSE guidelines22). In light of this circular, the inspectorate in Ireland was required not only to redevelop frameworks for school inspection and but also guidelines on school-self-evaluation and improvement planning. This task of school capacity building to carryout SSE and school improvement planning to meet the legislative requirements has been added to the advisory role of a school inspector.

The Inspectorate in Ireland is not just a policy implementer, it has its role in policy making as well. For example, the Irish Inspectorate recognised issues relating to lack of data informed decision making (DIDM). This resulted in the redevelopment of the SSE guidelines referred to above (2016)23) empasising DIDM and it has become a national priority along with Assessment for Learning. Both DIDM and AfL practices are at the core of the new Junior Cycle Curriculum.

In the case Greece, MERRA has introduced a regionalized educational system in which education units will be supported by interdisciplinary scientific teams; it also imposes the planning and evaluation of school work as well as a new selection system for educational management staff i.e. the Coordinators of Educational Work who will be responsible to support school improvement plans and school self-evaluation process.

In this new system, Regional Centers of Educational Support (PEKES) are the regional units while Educational Counseling and Support (KESY) and the Centers for Sustainable Development (KEA) are the local ones to support and supervise the school planning and self-evaluation. The Coordinators are the members of the PEKES. Each member of the PEKES is responsible for providing direct support to a number of school units on scientific and pedagogic topics. Each school's teachers together with the Principal should discuss the proposals and ideas in order to decide on the annual priorities for improvement. Every school unit shall prepare a collective draft and at the end of the academic year, its final evaluation which will be notified to PEKES. The Coordinators of the PEKES will continuously support the schools by providing the necessary tools and expertise while at the end of the year, they will draw up and send to the schools the assessment reports stressing the fields to be improved, proposing solutions and taking initiatives for training courses which will reinforce the teachers of a certain area sharing common needs.

The Spanish Constitution of 1978 provides that "the public authorities shall inspect and approve the education system to ensure compliance with the laws" (art. 27.8)24). In Spain, it is planned that each educational administration regulates the structure and operation of inspectorates in their respective territorial areas. According to the Education Act, the role of the inspectors is to supervise and control the operation of the centres, services and educational programmes; advise and oversee the school management, teaching practice and improvement plans in schools; promote and disseminate educational experimentation, innovation and research; and ensure compliance with the educational policies.

The Master Action Plan for the Education Inspectorate in Extremadura 2017 – 2020 is a three-year plan that includes “supervising, controlling, evaluating and counselling the organisation and operation of schools”, as one of eleven regular actions, which shall focus, among others, on the development of plans that contribute to school success. The Education Inspectorate Action Plan for School Year 2018 – 2019 includes among inspectorate’s regular actions, in the first, second and third term to “supervise, counsel and evaluate the School Plan for Improvement” in all state schools. Thus, during the first and second terms all district inspectors must check whether the Plan for Improvement is included in the School Educational Plan moreover, the inspectors also need to check whether measures derived from the analysis of previous year final evaluations results, have been included in the School General Annual Plan. When schools do not include the Plan or the measures, inspectors usually offer guidance, feedback and even training.

During the third term, inspectors also supervise the implementation of the tests at some specific schools, which is determined by the regional administration, and correct a sample of them. This action carried out by all district inspectors gives the Inspectorate the opportunity to control the implementation and check the actual level of students’ performance.

Frequency and forms of school inspection visits

In Bulgaria, according to the Regulations for inspection of kindergartens and schools, the National Inspectorate of Education will carry out total single school inspections every five years to evaluate the quality of education provision in Preschools and Schools while the regional Department of Education will conduct checks and controls. These checks and controls can be on-going or thematic. Hence, the inspection visits by the national Inspectorate are cyclical while RDE’s visits are both cyclical and differentiated. In the regulation an indirect reference is made to RDE visit in response to a complaint or signal (incidental inspections of schools).

In Ireland cyclical school inspections are conducted once in five years but there are various forms of differentiated inspections as well that include, incidental inspection, thematic inspection and subject inspections. Primary schools are inspected25) on a cyclical basis in line with annual inspection targets. A school report is prepared on each primary school on average every five years following a detailed school inspection. Specialist subject inspectors undertake subject inspections in postprimary schools26). An evaluation report on the teaching of a particular subject is given to the school. Inspectors may also visit schools in a number of other contexts, for example, the monitoring of special programmes that may be in place in that particular school. Whole School Evaluation has been introduced to secondary schools to complement other types of inspection.

The Evaluation Support and Research Unit (ESRU) of the Inspectorate is responsible for evaluating aspects of education provision through thematic or programme evaluations. At post-primary level these include Transition Year, Leaving Certificate Vocational Programme, Leaving Certificate Applied and the Junior Certificate School Programme. The success of these programmes has been evaluated and the Inspectorate has published reports giving full details of its findings.

In Greece, as the system for regionalized support and supervision is still to be established but it says that RDE will evaluate the Coordinators for Educational Work who will participate in the evaluation process of KESY, KEA and schools. There is no clarity how frequently the Coordinators for Educational Work will visit schools to evaluate their performance and who else will be part of this process.

There seems to be two forms of inspection visits carried out by the regional inspectors in Spain every year. The regional inspectors are supposed to visit schools in the first and second term of the school year to monitor if the school improvement plan is included in the School Education Plan and during the third term, they have to participate in the final evaluation of all primary and secondary schools as external evaluators. This means that they visit every school at least twice a year though the duration of their visit may vary depending on the objective of the visit.

Level of emphasis on school self-evaluation and improvement plan

In the case of Bulgaria, the regulation for quality management requires the schools to have a written plan for improvement developed for a period four years with a two-year action plan based on the findings of SSE. As the Regulation No 16/8.12.2016 which emphasized is currently suspended the implementation and use of school self-evaluation (SSE) and thus the validity of the school improvement plan cannot be guaranteed in the absence of systematic SSE.

In Ireland, according to the regulation all schools are expected to write an SSE report (evidence-based, of course) and draw up their school improvement plan in its light.

According to the OECD (2018), in Greece in 2016 – 2017, a new system of SSE was successfully piloted. Based on this pilot compulsory SSE is being introduced across the school systems. The developing regionalised education system in Greece, so far has not made it obligatory for schools to carry out self-evaluation and therefore, there is a mixed trend in schools about action planning for improvement. Some schools have whole school improvement plans while some develop action plans for specific education programmes.

In the case of Spain, schools are expected by the legislation to conduct selfevaluation and incorporate a school improvement plan in their Annual Educational plan which is monitored by the inspectorate. The inspectors are also required to check whether measures derived from the analysis of previous year final evaluations results, are specified in the School Annual Report or not.

Availability of support services for the schools

Regulation No 16/8.12.2016 on quality management (Bulgaria) that was expected to have details regarding how National Inspectorate and Regional Department of Education would support schools met resistance from teachers and leaders due to a number of reasons. Firstly, it did not provide clear indicators and criteria for quality evaluation and school self-evaluation and expected schools to developed their own; and secondly, the quality management regulations do not define a mechanism for follow-up and supervision of school improvements implementation after a period of time; and thirdly, no formal support system for schools has been developed to help them cope with the requirements of the new regulation. School principals had to form a school team for self-evaluation and provide the training, but this training was offered by various private training organizations with no common syllabus or law-set requirements. The unrest among school staff led to the suspension of the regulation and to ongoing debates about how it should be changed and implemented in practice.

However, there are two systems for the provision of professional support to schools within the ambit of the Regional Department of Education: the Department of organizational and methodical activity and control and the Community-consultative council. The former is supposed to provide methodical support to schools to ensure the fulfillment of the obligatory recommendations given to the school by the National inspectorate of education, or to a principal or a teacher by an expert from RDE or the Ministry of Education. Methodical support is provided through consultations, training, sharing good practices, and also through the participation of experts from RDE in school classes and/or different activities for inclusive education. The Communityconsultative council is a consultative body that holds regular meetings to share good practice with representatives of the NGO sector, school principals, representatives of the Ministry of Education, and other stakeholders and discusses relevant problems of school education in the region, possible solutions and joint actions.

Over the course of the last twenty years, Ireland has experienced profound changes to its inspection and SSE arrangements and is quite frequently championed by various trans-national organisations such as the EU, OECD, and the Standing International Conference of Inspectorates as an education system that has embraced what the authors of this report have previously referred to as ‘new school inspection’ (Brown, McNamara and O’Hara 2016a; 2016b; Brown 2013). ‘New school inspection’ allows inspectors to ascertain the quality of education provided in schools and in parallel, at a micro, macro and meso, level allows inspectors to support schools with their quality improvement journey; what might be referred to as a co-professional relationship for improvement. However, the support is offered in various forms and at different levels as described below:

– At a micro level, support is provided in the form of advising schools via the publication of inspection reports or directly, orally after an inspection. The inspectorate by request of each school and as resources allow, also advise schools on their SSE processes.

– At a macro level, in collaboration with education support services, the inspectorate as resources allow, also supports schools through the provision of continuing professional development opportunities, provided at regional locations via the National Network of Teacher/Education (Support) Centres27).

– At a Meso level, SSE support is provided through the provision of an extensive set of resources via a dedicated SSE web site that had been developed by the inspectorate. Most significantly towards the creation of a unified culture of SSE in schools, the inspectorate has also created SSE guidelines that are to be used by schools in the areas of Leadership and Teaching and Learning.

One distinctive feature of the Irish inspectorate is that every framework or guide to school inspection is developed in consultation with school leaders, representatives of school management bodies, teachers, parents and pupils/students, and a range of other bodies with whom DES works and co-operates (DES, 2015). This enhances the level of acceptance and ownership of the process by the stakeholders.

In the case of Greece, each Coordinator of Educational Work is responsible for providing direct support to a number of school units on teaching and learning and in drawing up and evaluating their improvement plans and doing school units needs analysis. School units are also encouraged to form groups (“schools' networks”), explore their needs and decide jointly what kind of further improvement they want to pursue; then, they should request the cooperation of the regional support and evaluation units in order to plan and implement CPD for teachers. Teachers' training is designed and provided by PEKES with the cooperation of the area (sub-regional) Directorates of Education and in accordance with the standards set by the IEP.

However, it should be noted that this is the very first year of the current Law No. 4547/12-6-2018 and as a consequence, it cannot be evaluated yet. Actually, only PEKES units have been staffed while KESY have only Heads appointed and KEA has not been even established. For the time being, the existing Centers of Environmental Education substitute for KEA. In any case, the members of the PEKES will be provided with an 18-hour training course about how to execute their duties (e.g. school planning & evaluation of schoolwork) properly and effectively.

In the case of Spain, the major support services of the inspectorate of education are built around supervising and, where needed, guiding schools in developing and implementing school improvement plans. Additionally, school inspectors, at the end of the school year, write an annual report of the schools that carried out special programmes for educational success based on their own supervisions and the school final report about the programme. These programmes are financed by the Department of Education and are implemented in schools that apply for them, as a means of improvement.

Other schools’ quality assurance and support programmes, include CPDEX – a training programme aimed to improve school performance by analysing teaching competences – and CALIDEX – a quality assurance programme for vocational training schools, can obtain support and feedback from inspectors, which can be delivered at the request of the school itself.

Discussion and Conclusion

School inspection has, to a remarkable degree, become a significant tool for both encouraging school improvement and enforcing accountability in recent decades. In some countries, this has been achieved through the resurrection and revivification of inspectorates which date back centuries and in others by the creation of inspectorates in countries with no history of inspection at all. Very few countries in Europe and indeed further afield have not developed inspection regimes, a possible exception being the US where testing seems to be still predominant in the governance of schools.

However, that is not to say that all these various inspection systems are the same or even similar. Far from it. Inspection is complicated by many, many issues of local context including, but by no means limited to, the political complexion of governments and the power of teacher unions. We postulated above that inspection regimes could be very roughly divided into those primarily concerned with accountability and sanctions and those concerned mainly with supporting and developing schools and teachers. This is, we admit, a gross over simplification. Systems primarily concerned with accountability perceive themselves to have a developmental function and those mostly concerned with school support and improvement invariably have an accountability role. This led us to propose a continuum, with inspection regimes spread along it, and we analysed each of the four countries in the project, under a variety of indicators, which we argue may suggest where it is placed on this continuum.

Interestingly, during our review of the four cases, we found out that on this hypothesised continuum of approaches to school inspection, all the cases are titled away from the supervisory high stake’s inspection end. In the case of Ireland, Greece and Spain, the inspectorate is a part of the Ministry of Education, which, we argue, lowers the centrality of accountability in comparison to cases where this work is entrusted to an external agency as, for example, in the case of OFSTED in England. In contrast, in Bulgaria, the National Inspectorate reports to a council of ministers and thereby can emphasise objectivity and reliability when reviewing education programmes and policies. In short, concerning accountability and governance the Bulgarian National Inspectorate has more authority, at least in theory, but the relatively underdeveloped actual implementation of inspection has made this power largely redundant.

Other than the above, the statutory powers of inspectorates seem uniform across the cases. School inspectors (inspection staff in the case of Bulgaria and Extremadura and Coordinators for Education Work in Greece) have rights of admission to schools, can access their documents and databases, investigate their practices and report to schools and later to higher management. In Ireland, there is more stringent regulation for safeguarding the powers of inspectors because anyone obstructing inspection is subject to a fine on conviction, but such powers have never been used and it is nearly inconceivable that they would ever be.

The fundamental roles and functions of inspectors are very similar in all four countries but the manner in which they are invoked in the schools can shifts their position from the supervisory end of our putative continuum to the advisory end of our spectrum. In Bulgaria and Greece, they are supposed to support schools in selfevaluation and school improvement planning. The Coordinators of Education Work in Greece are also required to coach schools in pedagogical practices. Their role seems quite similar to that of Scottish inspectors who are more of ‘professional coaches’ than ‘external examiners’ (NAIR). On the other hand, the role of Irish and Spanish inspectors appears to be more robust. They monitor compliance to laws, supervise and evaluate school practices, educational programmes and student achievement standards. Spanish inspectors while monitoring school improvement plans can guide and train school teams and Irish inspectors provide oral and written feedback (in the form of a published report) and as Altrichter and Kemethofer (2015) suggest, the publication of written report enhances the accountability pressure on schools and shifts inspectorates towards the high stakes approach end of the continuum.

The Inspectorate in Ireland despite its inherent rigour has not faced as much criticism as some of the other inspectorates in Europe. The trust and credibility that any inspection system enjoys among the school stakeholders is largely due to the transparency in the system and clearly laid out mechanisms. In Ireland the forms of inspections and their procedures are available on the DES website. Schools may feel pressurised due to incidental or differentiated inspections but they know and trust the process. Similarly, inspectorates in Spain produce their Yearly Action Plans that detail their requirements in a very clear manner and in consequence, schools expect their termly visits to monitor their improvement plans, standardized tests results and overall teaching and management.

The cases of Greece and Bulgaria are quite complicated especially due to the absence of quality criteria and indicators of good practices. Schools are not sure of the expectations or the standards against which they have to measure their performance. There is a need for the development of a common language and shared understanding between the internal and external evaluators of schools about what quality looks like and how it can be achieved. In Bulgaria, schools have already refused to accept the Regulation No. 16/8.12.2016 and in Greece the PEKES system is only partially developed and also faces a past precedent when schools rejected the whole school evaluation system. Schools’ general disregard of the inspection systems in both these countries is mainly due to the introduction of regulations without fully developing the mechanisms to implement them. There is a need to overcome the trust deficit between schools and inspectorates and establish the credibility of the inspection process and inspectors by beefing up the support systems as has been largely achieved in the case of Ireland. Moreover, the transparency of the process, with regards to outcomes and agenda will further strengthen schools’ confidence. Inspection systems in Ireland and to an extent Spain have maintained their rigour, established their credibility and achieved a genuinely co-professional mode of evaluation between the inspectorate and schools (Brown et al., 2018). The emerging inspection systems in the other two countries and indeed in many others can review these successful cases and make the most of their experience.

To finally summarise, this research perhaps highlights two points. The first is that it takes time, patience and continuity of policy, to implement and make acceptable a system of school inspection, which manages to balance the demands of accountability and support for schools and teachers. Of the examples here, Ireland has probably best achieved this, but it has been established by a very gradual movement from the support end of the continuum to something which is still quite low stakes but has a recognised impact on making schools more accountable. The second point is that these four examples are, in our view correctly, seeking to create balanced systems of inspection which hopefully will prove to be effective without resulting in the collateral damage which is associated with high stakes ‘hard-nosed’ inspection.

NOTES

1. Northern Ireland Assembly, Research and Information Service NIAR (2013). Approaches to school inspection (NIAR 521-13). Belfast.

2. Education Review Office (2103). Code of Conduct.

3. Office of Standards and Education (2009). Ofsted inspects – A framework for all Ofsted inspection and regulation.

4. Department of Education and Skills (2015). Code of practice for the inspectorate.

5. Education Review Office (2016). Effective Internal Evaluation for improvement.

6. Department of Education and Skills. (2016d). Looking at our School 2016. A Quality Framework for Post-Primary Schools. Dublin: Department of Education and Skills.

Department of Education and Skills. (2016e). Looking at our School 2016. A Quality Framework for Primary Schools. Dublin: Department of Education and Skills.

7. Education Scotland (2015). How Good is Our School.

8. Preschool and school education Act, State Gazette, No. 79/13.10.2015, in force 01.08.2016.

9. Reorganization of the Units for the Support of Primary and Secondary Education & other issues, Law No. 4547/2018, Greek Official Gazette No.102/A/12-6-2018, Athens, Greece.

10. Advancement of the Role of Educators – Establishing rules of evaluation and meritocracy in education & other issues. Law No. 3848/2010, Greek Official Gazette No. 71/A/19-5-2010, Athens, Greece.

11. Regulations No 15/8.12.2016 for inspection of kindergartens and schools, State Gazette, No. 100/16.12.2016.

12. Regulations for the structure and activities of the regional inspectorates of education, State Gazette, No. 61/8.07.2003.)

13. Department of Education and Skills.

14. Modifications on Law No. 4547/2018, Law No. 4572/2018, Greek Official Gazette No. 188/A/15-11-2018, Athens, Greece.

15. Ley Org†nica 2/2006, de 3 de mayo, de educaci–n (4/5/2006).

16. Ley 7/2011, de 7 de marzo, de Educaci–n de Extremadura (23/3/2011).

17. https://nio.government.bg/инспектиране/ръководство-за-инспектиране/

https://nio.government.bg/инспектиране/критерии/

18. Regulations for the structure and functions of the regional departments of education, State Gazette, No 13/7.02.2017.

19. Regulations No 16/8.12.2016 for managing quality in educational institutions, State Gazette, No. 100/16.12.2016).

20. Department of Education and Skills (2012a). Circular 0040/2012, implementation of school self-evaluation.

21. Department of Education and Skills (2012b). Circular 0039/2012, implementation of school self-evaluation.

22. Department of Education and Skills. (2012c). School Self Evaluation Guidelines for Post-Primary Schools. Dublin: Evaluation Support and Research Unit Inspectorate. Department of Education and Skills.

Department of Education and Skills. (2012d) School Self Evaluation Guidelines for Primary Schools. Dublin: Evaluation Support and Research Unit Inspectorate. Department of Education and Skills.

23. Department of Education and Skills. (2016a). Circular 0040/2016, Continuing Implementation of School Self-Evaluation 2016 – 2020.

24. Constituci–n Espa•ola (29/12/1978).

25. Department of Education and Skills. (2016c). A guide to Inspection in Primary Schools. Dublin: Department of Education and Skills.

26. Department of Education and Skills. (2016b). A guide to Inspection in PostPrimary Schools. Dublin: Department of Education and Skills.

REFERENCES

Altrichter, H. and Kemethofer, D. (2015). Does accountability pressure through school inspections promote school improvement? School Eectiveness and School Improvement, 26 (1), 32 – 56.

Barber. (2004). The virtue of accountability: system redesign, inspection and incentives in the era of reformed professionalism. Journal of Education, 185(1), 7 – 38.

Baxter, J. (2017). School Inspectors as Policy Implementers: Influences and Activities. In: J. Baxter (Ed.), School Inspectors Policy Implementers, Policy Shapers in National Policy Contexts (1 – 23). United Kingdom: Springer.

Baxter, J. and Hult, A. (2017). Different Systems, Different Identities: The work of Inspectors in Sweden and England. In: J. Baxter (Ed.), In School Inspectors Policy Implementers, Policy Shapers in National Policy Contexts (45 – 69). United Kingdom: Springer.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27 – 40.

Brown, M. (2013). Deconstructing Evaluation in Education. Dublin: Dublin City University.

Brown, M., McNamara, G., and O Hara, J. (2016a). Teacher Accountability in Education – The Irish Experiment. In: B. Walsh (Ed.), Essays in the History of Irish Education (359 – 381). United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.

Brown, M., McNamara, G. & O'Hara, J. (2016b). Quality and the rise of value-added in education: The case of Ireland. Policy Futures in Education, 14 (6), 810 – 829.

Brown, M., McNamara, G., Ohara, J., O'Brien, S., Faddar, J. & Young, C. (2018). Integrated Co-Professional Evaluation? Converging Approaches to School Evaluation Across Frontiers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(12).

Clarke, J. (2017). Forward: Inspecting School – Assembling Control? In: J. Baxter (Ed.), School Inspectors: Policy Implementers, Policy Shapers in National Policy Contexts (V – VII). United Kingdom: Springer.

Dimitropoulos, A. & Kindi, V. (2017). Paper commissioned for the 2017/8 Global Education Monitoring Report, Accountability in education: Meeting our commitments. Paris: UNESCO.

Ehren, M.C., Gustafsson, J.E., Altrichter, H., Skedsmo, G., Kemethofer, D. & Huber, S.G. (2015). Comparing effects and side effects of different school inspection systems across Europe. Comparative Education, 51(3), 375 – 400.

Macbeath, J. (2006). School inspection & self-evaluation. New York: Routledge.

Mavrogiorgos, G. (1993). Educators and Evaluation, published by. Athens: Synchroni Ekpedefsi.

Nevo, D. (2001). School evaluation: internal or external? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27 (2), 95 – 106.

O’Leary, Z. (2014). The essential guide to doing your research project (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Ozga, J., Baxter, J., Clarke, J., Grek, S. & Lawn, M. (2013). The politics of educational change: Governance and school inspection in England and Scotland. Swiss Journal of Sociology, 39(2), 37 – 55.

Punch, K. F. (2005). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Prof. Dr. Gerry McNamara

2025 година
Книжка 7
INSIGHTS FROM EXPLORING PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS ON CORE CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERCULTURAL EDUCATION

Prof. Dr. Bujar Adili, Prof. Dr. Arbresha Zenki-Dalipi, Prof. Dr. Jehona Rushidi-Rexhepi

ВРЪЗКА НА СОЦИАЛНО-ЕМОЦИОНАЛНОТО С КОГНИТИВНОТО РАЗВИТИЕ В ПРИОБЩАВАЩА СРЕДА

Проф. д.п.н. Милен Замфиров, проф. д.н. Маргарита Бакрачева, проф. д-р Емилия Евгениева

ПРОГНОЗИРАНЕ НА УСПЕВАЕМОСТТА НА СТУДЕНТИТЕ: СЪВРЕМЕННИ МОДЕЛИ И ТЕХНИКИ

Доц. д-р Силвия Гафтанджиева, проф. д-р Росица Донева

Книжка 6
FORMATION OF INCLUSIVE COMPETENCE OF HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENTS IN THE FIELD OF KNOWLEDGE 01 EDUCATION/PEDAGOGY

Dr. Oksana Dmitriieva, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Olena Chopik, Assoc. Prof., Prof. Dr. Svitlana Mykhalska

КОГНИТИВНО РАЗВИТИЕ НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ, ОБХВАНАТИ В ПРИОБЩАВАЩОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Проф. д.п.н. Милен Замфиров, проф. д-р Емилия Евгениева, проф. д.н. Маргарита Бакрачева

Книжка 5
COMPETENCE FOR SOCIAL PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICE: WHAT DO STUDENTS TELL US?

Dr. Maya Tcholakova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Marina Pironkova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Aleksandar Ranev, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Yana Staneva, Assist. Prof.

“LEARNING THROUGH RESEARCH” AS A STRATEGIC DIRECTION OF MODERNIZATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION

Dr. Tetiana Franchuk, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Lesia Ruda, Prof. Dr. Svitlana Myronova

MULTIMODAL COMMUNICATION IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION CLASSES

Prof. Dr. Cristiana Lucretia Pop, Dr. Cristina Filip, Assist. Prof.

Книжка 4s
GAMES IN FUNCTION OF DEVELOPMENT OF MULTIPLICATION SKILLS

Dasare Sylejmani, PhD student, Prof. Dr. Vesna Makashevska, Prof. Dr. Jasmina Jovanovska

Книжка 4
MILITARY AND SOCIAL THREATS AS DETERMINANTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONTEMPORARY UKRAINIAN HIGHER EDUCATION

Prof. Mykola Pantiuk, DSc., Prof. Tetiana Pantiuk, DSc. Prof. Nataliia Bakhmat, DSc. Prof. Olena Nevmerzhytska, DSc., Dr. Svitlana Ivakh, Assoc. Prof.

STEM ОБУЧЕНИЕ НА СТУДЕНТИ ПЕДАГОЗИ В ТРАНСДИСЦИПЛИНАРНА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА СРЕДА

Проф. д.н. Любен Витанов, проф. д-р Николай Цанев, гл. ас. д-р Людмила Зафирова, гл. ас. д-р Гергана Христова, ас. Катерина Динкова, Калина Георгиева, Жорж Кюшев, Здравка Савчева

ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ И АНАЛИЗ НА НАГЛАСИТЕ НА СТУДЕНТИТЕ ПРИ ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА ГЕНЕРАТИВЕН ИНСТРУМЕНТ НА ИЗКУСТВЕН ИНТЕЛЕКТ

Доц. д-р Николай Янев, гл. ас. д-р Иглика Гетова Доц. д-р Теодора Христова Гл. ас. д-р Ива Костадинова, проф. д-р Георги Димитров

Книжка 3
ОЦЕНКИ И НАГЛАСИ КЪМ ПРОЦЕДУРИТЕ ЗА ПОДБОР НА ДИРЕКТОРИ НА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИ ИНСТИТУЦИИ – ПЪРВОНАЧАЛНИ ДАННИ

Доц. д-р Йонка Първанова, доц. д-р Божидара Кривирадева, Данко Калапиш, Деяна Милушева

ДРУГИЯТ КАТО ЦЕННОСТ В УЧИЛИЩЕ

Гл. ас. д-р Александър Кръстев

Книжка 2
ASSESSMENTS OF TEACHERS AND PARENTS OF CHILDREN WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ON INCLUSION IN PRE-SCHOOL INSTITUTIONS

Prof. Zagorka Markov, DSc. Prof. Hadzi Zivorad Milenovic, DSc. Prof. Biljana Jeremic, DSc., Radmila Zecevic, Assist. Prof. Mrs. Milica Pavlovic

INTEGRATING COOPERATIVE LEARNING IN DISTANCE EDUCATION FOR METHODOLOGY OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS COURSE

Dr. Aleksandar Milenković, Assist. Prof., Mrs. Jelena Stevanić, PhD student.

Книжка 1s
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА СРЕДСТВАТА ЗА ДОПЪЛВАЩА И АЛТЕРНАТИВНА КОМУНИКАЦИЯ В ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИТЕ ИНСТИТУЦИИ В БЪЛГАРИЯ

Проф. д-р. Неда Балканска, доц. д-р. Анна Трошева-Асенова, доц. д-р. Пенка Шапкова, ас. Снежина Михайлова

USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING

Prof. Dr. Ekaterina Sofronieva, Dr. Christina Beleva, Assist. Prof., Dr. Galina Georgieva, Assoc. Prof.

САМООЦЕНКА НА КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТИТЕ В ПРОЦЕСА НА ОБУЧЕНИЕ В СПЕЦИАЛНОСТ „СОЦИАЛНА ПЕДАГОГИКА“: ПРЕДВАРИТЕЛНИ РЕЗУЛТАТИ

Доц. д-р Мая Чолакова, д-р Мартин Ценов, д-р Цветослав Николов, д-р Красимир Костов

Книжка 1
Скъпи читатели, автори, приятели на списание „Педагогика“,

В началото на 2025 година в първия брой на нашето списание „Педагогика“ бих искала от името на редакционната колегия и от мое име да Ви пожелая здраве, творческо вдъхновение и професионално удовлетворение от прино- са Ви към педагогическата наука и практика! Вярвам и се надявам, че списание „Педагоги- ка“ ще продължи да осигурява платформа за научен, обективен и откровен диалог, базиран на резултати от научни изследвания, за насто- ящето и бъдещето на обучението и образова- н

TRENDS IN SCIENCE EDUCATION FROM THE DIGITAL PERSPECTIVE: A STUDY SUPPORTED BY A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

Dr. Ivelina Kotseva, Assist. Prof., Dr. Maya Gaydarova, Assoc. Prof.

РЕЗУЛТАТИ ОТ ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА ГЛАГОЛНА СЕМАНТИКА ПРИ ДЕЦА ЧРЕЗ ЕЗИКОВИ ЗАДАЧИ, ПРОВЕДЕНИ ОНЛАЙН

Д-р Валентина Стефанова, д-р Мария Тодорова, доц. д-р Цветана Димитрова

2024 година
Книжка 9s
Книжка 9
ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT OF VIDEO LEARNING RESOURCES IN SMALL-SCALE LEARNING SCENARIOS

Mr. Csar C–rcoles, Dr. Laia Blasco-Soplon, Dr. Germ†n Cobo Rodr‘guez, Dr. Ana-Elena Guerrero-Rold†n

USING DIGITAL EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES TO PROMOTE INTERCULTURAL INTERACTION OF THE FUTURE ECONOMISTS IN THE EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT

Dr. Oksana Tynkaliuk, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Vira Chornii, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Oksana Kutsa, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Mariana Karanevych, Assoc. Prof.

ДОБРОВОЛЧЕСТВОТО КАТО ВЪЗМОЖНОСТ ЗА ОСИГУРЯВАНЕ НА РАВЕН ДОСТЪП ДО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ ЗА ВСИЧКИ

(Резултати от проучване мнението на учители и студенти) Доц. д-р Стефан Милетиев

Книжка 8
АНГАЖИРАНОСТ КЪМ УЧЕНЕ ЧРЕЗ ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА СМАРТ ТЕХНОЛОГИИТЕ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Проф. д-р Кирилка Тагарева, проф. д.п.н. Дора Левтерова-Гаджалова, доц. д-р Ваня Сивакова

DIGITAL STORYTELLING AS A METHOD OF ACHIEVING VISUAL LITERACY

Dr. Silvana Karagyozova, Assist. Prof.

Книжка 7
Книжка 6
LEVELS OF SELF-EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY OF STUDENTS OF HUMANITARIAN FACULTIES OF THE UNIVERSITY

Dr. Iryna Sereda, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Nina Stelmah, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 5s
ИЗМЕРЕНИЯ НА ЦЕННОСТНИЯ ПОДХОД В АКАДЕМИЧНАТА ПОДГОТОВКА И ПРАКТИКАТА НА СОЦИАЛНИТЕ РАБОТНИЦИ

Проф. д-р Лиляна Стракова, доц. д-р Росица Симеонова, гл. ас. д-р Атанас Генчев

СТУДЕНТИТЕ ОТ СПЕЦИАЛНОСТ „НЕФОРМАЛНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ“ В УСЛОВИЯТА НА СТАЖАНТСКАТА ПРЕДДИПЛОМНА ПРАКТИКА – ПОДГОТОВКА, ВЪВЕЖДАНЕ, ЗАЩИТА

Доц. д-р Владислав Господинов, гл. ас. д-р Галина Георгиева, Румяна Георгиева-Илиева, Мирослава Славейкова

ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВАТА НА СТАЖАНТСКАТА ПРАКТИКА ПРЕД СТУДЕНТИ – БЪДЕЩИ УЧИТЕЛИ

Доц. д-р Илиана Петкова, гл. ас. д-р Марияна Илиева, Владислава Станоева, Георги Чавдаров

ПРЕДДИПЛОМНАТА ПРАКТИЧЕСКА ПОДГОТОВКА НА СТУДЕНТИТЕ ОТ СПЕЦИАЛНОСТ „СОЦИАЛНИ ДЕЙНОСТИ“ КАТО ОСНОВА ЗА ТЯХНАТА БЪДЕЩА ПРОФЕСИОНАЛНА РЕАЛИЗАЦИЯ

Гл. ас. д-р Анета Рашева, Русана Гаджанова, гл. ас. д-р Александър Христов, проф. д.п.н. Моника Богданова

Книжка 5
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, ALGORITHM LITERACY, LOCUS OF CONTROL, AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE SKILLS: A STUDY AMONG BULGARIAN STUDENTS IN EDUCATION

Prof. Dr. Ekaterina Sofronieva, Dr. Christina Beleva, Assist. Prof. Dr. Galina Georgieva, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Stefan Markov, Assist. Prof.

FEATURES OF SPEECH COMPREHENSION TRAINING OF CHILDREN WITH AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS

Dr. Maryna Branytska Prof. Dr. Svitlana Myronova, Dr. Svitlana Mykhalska, Assoc. Prof.

OVERVIEW OF THE STEM EDUCATION IN ISRAEL

Aharon Goldreich Dr. Elena Karashtranova, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 4
НАГЛАСИ НА СТУДЕНТИТЕ КЪМ СМАРТ ТЕХНОЛОГИИТЕ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Проф. д.п.н. Дора Левтерова-Гаджалова, проф. д-р Кирилка Тагарева, доц. д-р Ваня Сивакова

PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT FOR YOUNG RESEARCHERS

Prof. Emina Vukašinović, DSc., Dr. Marija Veselinović, Assist. Prof., Dr. Milan Milikić, Assist. Prof.

РОБОТИТЕ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО – ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА STEAM ИГРА

Ас. д-р Мария Желязкова, гл. ас. д-р Михаил Кожухаров, доц. д-р Даниела Кожухарова

Книжка 3s
ANALYSIS OF THE DIGITAL COMPETENCIES OF PHYSICS TEACHERS IN BULGARIA ACCORDING TO THE DIGCOMPEDU FRAMEWORK

Dr. Ivelina Kotseva, Assist. Prof., Dr. Maya Gaydarova, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 3
ДИГИТАЛНИ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ПОДКРЕПА НА УЧЕНЕТО

Доц. д-р Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова, доц. д-р Лъчезар Лазаров

SOCIAL INTEREST AND STRESS TOLERANCE

Prof. Zhaneta Stoykova, DSc.

PREPARATION OF FUTURE TEACHERS FOR ORGANISING A HEALTH-PRESERVING INCLUSIVE SPACE IN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

Prof. Nadiya Skotna, DSc. Dr. Tetiana Nadimyanova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Anna Fedorovych, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Myroslava Sosiak, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Oksana Yatsiv, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 2s
METHOD FOR SOLVING SYSTEM OF LINEAR EQUATIONS MXN, M=1, 2, 3; BASED ON ITS GEOMETRICAL INTERPRETATIONS

Prof. Zoran Misajleski, DSc., Prof. Daniel Velinov, DSc. Prof. Aneta Velkoska, DSc.

Книжка 2
ОТ РИСУНКА – КЪМ СНИМКА

Доц. д-р Камен Теофилов

STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITY OF TEACHERS OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS: THE INFLUENCE OF SOCIAL CONDITIONS

Prof. Dr. Nadiia Vientseva, Dr. Oksana Orhiiets, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Anetta Omelchenko, Assoc. Prof. Stanislav Romanchuk

Книжка 1s
CHALLENGES TO ENTREPRENEURSHIP EDUCATION IN HIGH SCHOOL. INTERACTION BETWEEN FORMAL AND INFORMAL ASSESSMENT

Dr. Vilyana Ruseva, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Stela Baltova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Evgeniya Nikolova, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 1
„ВТОРОТО“ БЪЛГАРСКО УЧИЛИЩЕ. ГЕНЕЗИСЪТ

Проф. д.п.н. Пенка Цонева, доц. д-р Бистра Мизова

EMANCIPATORY EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICES

Luka Nikolić, Assist. Prof. Dr. Aleksandar Tadić , Assoc. Prof.

INNOVATIVE PRACTICES IN TEACHERS’ AND STUDENTS’ TRAININGS

Dr. Ivelina Velcheva, Assist. Prof., Dr. Deyana Peykova

2023 година
Книжка 9
EXPLORING THE NARRATIVE IDENTITY OF HUNGARIAN TEACHERS IN SLOVAKIA

Dr. Patrik Baka, Dr. Terzia Stredl, Dr. Kinga Horv†th Dr. Zsuzsanna Husz†r Dr. Melinda Nagy, Dr. Pter T–th, Prof. DSc. Andr†s Nmeth

Книжка 8
КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТНИЯТ ПРОФИЛ НА УЧИТЕЛЯ – ПОДГОТОВКА В УНИВЕРСИТЕТСКА СРЕДА

Проф. д.п.н. Сийка Чавдарова-Костова, ас. д-р Екатерина Томова

A QUALITY “ONLINE” TEACHER – WHAT DO STUDENTS APPRECIATE AND VALUE IN TEACHERS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING?

Dr. Irena Golubović-Ilić, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Ivana Ćirković-Miladinović, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Nataša Vukićević, Assoc. Prof.

SUPPORT FOR THE INCLUSION OF ROMA CHILDREN THROUGH THE PROJECT TEACHING MODEL

Prof. Biljana Jeremić, DSc., Prof. Aleksandra Trbojević, DSc., Prof. Bojan Lazić, DSc., Prof. Gordana Kozoderović, DSc.

TREND ANALYSIS OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCES OF SPORTS TEACHERS AND COACHES

Dr. Sergejs Capulis, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Valerijs Dombrovskis, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Svetlana Guseva, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Alona Korniseva, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 7
DEVELOPMENT OF THE DIGITAL COMPETENCES OF PERSPECTIVE PRIMARY-SCHOOL TEACHERS

Prof. Dr. Vladimira Angelova, Dr. Hilda Terlemezyan, Assoc. Prof.

ЦЕННОСТЕН ПРОФИЛ НА УЧИТЕЛИТЕ В НАЦИОНАЛЕН КОНТЕКСТ

Проф. д.с.н. Цветан Давидков, доц. д-р Силвия Цветанска

STEM ОБУЧЕНИЕ В НАЧАЛНИТЕ КЛАСОВЕ: ГОТОВИ ЛИ СА УЧИТЕЛИТЕ?

Доц. д-р Любка Алексиева, проф. д-р Илиана Мирчева

Книжка 6s
TWO STROKE DUAL FUEL ENGINE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS ON LIQUID AND GAS FUEL MODE RELATED TO THE NEW TRAINING DEMANDS FOR MARINE ENGINEERS

Dr. Delyan Hristov, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Dimitar Vasilev, Assist. Prof., Iliyan Kurtev, Аssist. Prof.

MODELLING OF MARITIME CYBER SECURITY EDUCATION AND TRAINING

Dr. Gizem Kayisoglu, Dr. Pelin Bolat, Dr. Emre Duzenli

INTRODUCING THE USE OF CASE STUDIES METHODOLOGY IN TRAINING FOR SOFT SKILLS IN MARITIME UNIVERSITIES. THE ISOL-MET PROGRAM

Prof. Dr. Maria Lekakou, Dr. Helen Iakovaki, Assist. Prof. Dimitris Vintzilaios Markella Gota Giorgos Georgoulis Thalia Vintzilaiou

IMPLEMENTING INNOVATIVE APPROACHES AND LEARNING METHODS IN MARITIME EDUCATION

Dr. Valentina Grancharova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Siyana Lutzkanova, Assoc. Prof.

THE ROLE OF MARITIME EDUCATION IN DIGITALIZATION

Dr. Kamelia Narleva, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Yana Gancheva, Assist. Prof.

Книжка 6
С МИСИЯ ЗА НАЦИОНАЛНА И КУЛТУРНА ИНДИВИДУАЛНОСТ

(По повод 135 години от откриването на първия Висш педагогически курс в България (1888) Доц. д-р Надежда Кръстева, проф. д.н. Йордан Колев

THE ROLE OF THE SPECIAL TEACHER IN THE FORMATION OF MOTIVATION FOR EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES OF STUDENTS WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES

Dr. Svitlana Mykhalska, Assoc. Prof., Prof. Dr. Svitlana Myronova, Dr. Tetiana Dokuchyna, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Maryana Buinyak

Книжка 5s
PREFACE

Nikola Vaptsarov Naval Academy is the oldest technical educational institution in Bulgaria. The Naval Academy is one of the symbols of Varna and Bulgaria in the world maritime community. Its history and achievements establish it as the most prestigious center for training of maritime specialists. At present, the Naval Academy trains specialists for the Navy and for the merchant marine in all areas of maritime life. Research and development conducted at the Naval Academy in Varna

A FAIR CONCERN ABOUT ECDIS

Nikolay Sozonov, Assist. Prof. Dr. Dilyan Dimitranov, Assist. Prof.

COMPOSING A STANDARD FOR ELECTRONIC CHART DISPLAY AND INFORMATION SYSTEM TYPE SPECIFIC TRAINING

Dr. Dimitar Komitov, Assist. Prof. Aleksandrina Angelova, Assist. Prof.

DATA-DRIVEN LEARNING APPROACH TO MARITIME ENGLISH

Jana Kegalj, Dr. Mirjana Borucinsky, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sandra Tominac Coslovich, Assoc. Prof.

DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS THROUGH THE “CASE STUDY” TEACHING METHOD IN MARITIME ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING (MELT)

Tamila Mikeladze, Assoc. Prof. Svetlana Rodinadze, Assoc. Prof. Prof. Dr. Zurab Bezhanovi, Kristine Zarbazoia, Assoc. Prof. Medea Abashidze, Assoc. Prof. Kristine Iakobadze

USING REALISTIC MOVIES AS AN ATTRACTIVE STRATEGY FOR TEACHING MARITIME ENGLISH

Dr. Svitlana Korieshkova, Assoc. Prof., Maria Didenko

MAXIMIZING STUDENTS’ LEARNING IN MARITIME ENGLISH ONLINE COURSE

Prof. Dr. Valentyna Kudryavtseva, Dr. Svitlana Barsuk, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Olena Frolova, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 5
ОЦЕНКА НА ОБЩООБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИТЕ И РЕСУРСНИТЕ УЧИТЕЛИ ЗА РАБОТА В ПАРАДИГМАТА НА ПРИОБЩАВАЩОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Проф. д.п.н. Милен Замфиров, проф. д-р Емилия Евгениева, проф. д-р Маргарита Бакрачева

Книжка 4s
Книжка 4
COMPARISON OF 3

Dr. Zeynep Sonay Ay, Assist. Prof.

СЛОВА ЗА ТРИНАДЕСЕТ ПЕДАГОЗИ И ПСИХОЛОЗИ

Проф. д.пс. и д.п.н. Любен Ст. Георгиев

ЗА ПРИОБЩАВАЩАТА КЛАСНА СТАЯ В ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА СРЕДА

Проф. д.п.н. Дора Левтерова-Гаджалова

Книжка 3s
СПИРАЛАТА ОБЩЕСТВО – ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Проф. д-р Иванка Шивачева-Пинеда

ПРОУЧВАНЕ УДОВЛЕТВОРЕНОСТТА НА МЛАДИТЕ ХОРА В БЪЛГАРИЯ ОТ ОНЛАЙН ОБУЧЕНИЕТО

Проф. д-р Веселина Иванова Проф. д.п.н. Елеонора Милева

Книжка 3
СРАВНИТЕЛЕН АНАЛИЗ НА НАГЛАСИТЕ НА ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛИ И СТУДЕНТИ КЪМ ПЛАТФОРМАТА ЗА ДИСТАНЦИОННО ОБУЧЕНИЕ MOODLE В КОНТЕКСТА НА ПАНДЕМИЯТА ОТ COVID-19

Проф. д-р Веселина Вълканова, проф. д.н. Андреана Ефтимова, гл. ас. д-р Мая Стоянова, ас. д-р Йордан Карапенчев

ПРОЕКТНО БАЗИРАНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ ЗА СОЦИАЛНО-ЕМОЦИОНАЛНИ И ТЕХНОЛОГИЧНИ УМЕНИЯ ЧРЕЗ ПРОГРАМАТА „УМЕНИЯ ЗА ИНОВАЦИИ“

Проф. д-р Галин Цоков, д-р Александър Ангелов Йоанна Минчева Рени Димова, Мария Цакова

МЕДИЙНАТА ГРАМОТНОСТ И УЧИТЕЛИТЕ

Доц. д-р Светла Цанкова, доц. д-р Стела Ангова, гл. ас. д-р Мария Николова, гл. ас. д-р Иван Вълчанов, гл. ас. д-р Илия Вълков, д-р Георги Минев

Книжка 2
INTONATION AND CHILDREN WITH EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL PROBLEMS

Dr. Katerina Zlatkova-Doncheva, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Vladislav Marinov, Assoc. Prof.

ADVANTAGES OF USING GEOGEBRA SOFTWARE WHEN EXAMINING THE FLOW AND DRAWING A GRAPH OF A FUNCTION

Dr. Elena Gelova, Assist. Prof. Dr. Mirjana Vitanova, Assist. Prof.

Книжка 1
ДИСЦИПЛИНАРНАТА ПАРАДИГМА НА ДЖОН ЛОК

Проф. д-р Наталия Витанова

ЕЛЕКТРОННОТО ОБУЧЕНИЕ В КОНТЕКСТА НА ПРОДЪЛЖАВАЩАТА КВАЛИФИКАЦИЯ НА ДЪРЖАВНИТЕ СЛУЖИТЕЛИ

Доц. д-р Благовесна Йовкова, проф. д-р Румяна Пейчева-Форсайт

2022 година
Книжка 9
ТРАНСГРЕСИВНО-СИНЕРГИЧНО КАРИЕРНО РАЗВИТИЕ В „НЕФОРМАЛНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ“ В УНИВЕРСИТЕТА

Проф. д.п.н Яна Рашева-Мерджанова, проф. д.п.н. Моника Богданова, доц. д-р Илиана Петкова

Книжка 8
ADOPTION OF LMS MOODLE TOOLS IN STUDENT LEARNING – IN LINE WITH TEACHING PRACTICES

Dr. Silviya Blagoeva-Karamfilova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Silvia Parusheva, Assoc. Prof.

INTEGRATING INTERCULTURAL EDUCATION IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOL CURRICULUM

Bujar Adili, Prof. Dr. Sonja Petrovska, Gzim Xhambazi

НАГЛАСИ НА БЪДЕЩИТЕ ДЕТСКИ УЧИТЕЛИ КЪМ STEM ПОДХОДА

Проф. д.н. Наталия Павлова Михаела Тончева

Книжка 7
НАЦИОНАЛНАТА ИДЕЯ НА ПАИСИЙ ХИЛЕНДАРСКИ

(Посвещава се на 300-годишнината от рождението на св. Паисий Хилендарски (1722 – 1773)) Проф. д.п.н. Йордан Колев, доц. д-р Надежда Кръстева

GENDER DIFFERENTIATION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF GENERAL SECONDARY EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

Dr. Nadiia Vientseva, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Olga Starokozhko

ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА ОСНОВНА ГЛАГОЛНА ЛЕКСИКА В БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕЗИК ПРИ УЧЕНИЦИ В НАЧАЛЕН ЕТАП НА ОБУЧЕНИЕ ЧРЕЗ ОНЛАЙН ИГРИ

Гл. ас. д-р Мария Тодорова, гл. ас. д-р Цветана Димитрова, гл. ас. д-р Валентина Стефанова

140 ГОДИНИ ПРЕДУЧИЛИЩНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ: ПОСТИЖЕНИЯ И ХОРИЗОНТИ

Енгелс-Критидис, Р., 2022. 140 години предучилищно образование в България: постижения и хоризонти. Юбилеен сборник. София: УИ „Св. Климент Охридски“, ISBN 978-954-07-5471-0

Книжка 6
COMMUNICATION COMPETENCE OF TEACHERS IN CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL-PEDAGOGICAL WORK

Dr. Mirko Miletic, DSc. Dr. Marko Djordjevic, Assoc. Prof.

МОДЕЛ НА УЧИЛИЩНА ГОТОВНОСТ

Доц. д-р Ася Велева

ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКО ПРЕДМЕТНО ЗНАНИЕ В ПРИРОДОНАУЧНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ: ТРУДНОСТИ ПО ОРГАНИЧНА ХИМИЯ

Доц. д-р Александрия Генджова, д-р Нина Маркова, Калин Чакъров

MODERN PRACTICE OF USING INTERACTIVE FORMS AND METHODS OF PREVENTIVE EDUCATION OF THE STUDENT YOUTH

Dr. Svitlana Surgova, Assist. Prof., Dr. Olena Faichuk, Assist. Prof.

Книжка 5
МОДЕЛ НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО НА БЪДЕЩЕТО

Проф. д-р Наталия Витанова

THE TECHNOLOGY OF DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNICATIVE CULTURE OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS

Prof. Dr. Mariia Oliiar , Prof. Dr. Nataliia Blahun , Prof. Dr. Halyna Bilavych , Prof. Dr. Nataliia Bakhmat Prof. Dr. Tetyana Pantyuk

Книжка 4
TEACHERS’ ATTITUDES BOUT TEACHING AND LEARNING MATHEMATICS

Dr. Aleksandra Mihajlović, Assoc. Prof. Prof. Emina Kopas-Vukašinović, DSc. Vladimir Stanojević

STUDENTS` ACTIVITIES IN THE DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT

Dr. Tatiana Shopova, Assoc. Prof.

EDUCATION 4.0 – THE CHANGE OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE LABOUR MARKET

Dr. Gergana Dimitrova, Assist. Prof., Dr. Blaga Madzhurova, Assist. Prof., Dr. Stefan Raychev, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Dobrinka Stoyanova, Assoc.Prof.

TESTS IN SPECIALIZED LATIN FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES

Petkova, G., 2021. Tests for practice in class and self-preparation in Latin and specialized terminology for students of “Medicine”, “Dental medicine”, and “Pharmacy”. Part 1. Alphabet, pronunciation and accentuation; first and second declension – nouns and adjectives, complex clinical terms (Greek by origin). Plovdiv: Koala Press Publishing, ISBN 978-619-7536-94-2.

Книжка 3s
TEACHING IN THE DIGITAL AGE DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Prof. Dr. Madeleine Danova Prof. Danail Danov, DSc.

DISTANCE LEARNING IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMICS

Dr. Baktybek Keldibekov, Assoc. Prof. Shailoobek Karagulov

DIGITAL UNIVERSITIES: FEATURES AND KEY CHARACTERISTICS

Dr. Marina Skiba, Assoc. Prof. Prof. Maktagali Bektemessov, DSc. Dr. Alma Turganbayeva, Assist. Prof.

FEATURES OF THE FORMATION OF THE “SELF” CONCEPT OF STUDENTS USING DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Berik Matayev Prof. Dr. Kadisha Shalgynbayeva Dr. Zaru Kulsharipova, Assoc. Prof.

TEACHING ENGLISH PRONUNCIATION DURING THE COVID PANDEMIC

Dr. Snezhina Dimitrova, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 3
MODULAR-CYBERNETIC APPROACH FOR DEVELOPMENT OF DIGITAL COMPETENCE OF STUDENTS – FUTURE TEACHERS

Assoc. Prof. Nikolay Tsankov, DSc. Dr. Ivo Damyanov, Assist. Prof.

INFLUENCE OF FAMILY EDUCATION ON THE PSYCHOPHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIALIZATION OF A CHILD WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES

Dr. Svitlana Mykhalska, Assoc. Prof., Prof. Dr. Svitlana Myronova, Dr. Maryana Buinyak

HUMANE EDUCATION – BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES

Dr. Anna Arnaudova-Otouzbirova, Assist. Prof.

Книжка 2
TWO-TIER MODEL OF TRAINING FUTURE TEACHERS FOR COACHING AT OUT-OF-SCHOOL INSTITUTIONS

Prof. Dr. Borys Savchuk Prof. Dr. Tetyana Pantyuk Dr. Natalia Sultanova, Assoc. Prof. Prof. Dr. Halyna Bilavych Prof. Dr. Mykola Pantyuk

UNIVERSITY LEARNING OUTCOMES: STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE WITHIN THE THEORY OF ILL-POSED PROBLEMS

Dr. Alma Turganbayeva Prof. Maktagali Bektemessov, DSc. Prof. Dr. Marina Skiba

Книжка 1
HEURISTIC POTENTIAL OF TRANSFORMATIVE LEARNING IDEAS

Prof. Dr. Svitlana Hanaba Dr. Olena Voitiuk, Assoc. Prof.

ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИ ПОДКАСТИ В ПРОФЕСИОНАЛНАТА ПОДГОТОВКА НА БЪДЕЩИ УЧИТЕЛИ ПО БИОЛОГИЯ

(В условията на епидемична обстановка, причинена от COVID-19) Доц. д-р Ася Асенова

2021 година
Книжка 9
ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЕТО МЕЖДУ ФОРМАЛНОТО И НЕФОРМАЛНОТО ЗДРАВНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Доц. д-р Вержиния Боянова Гл. ас. д-р Константин Теодосиев Гл. ас. д-р Берджухи Йорданова

FORMATION OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE OF ASSISTANT TEACHER OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN SECONDARY EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

Prof. Dr. Vladyslava Liubarets, Prof. Dr. Nataliia Bakhmat, Prof. Dr. Olena Matviienko, Oksana Tsykhmeistruk, Inna Feltsan

Книжка 8
ОТНОСНО ЗАДЪЛЖИТЕЛНОСТТА НА ПРЕДУЧИЛИЩНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ – РЕЗУЛТАТИ ОТ ЕДНО ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ

Проф. д-р Маргарита Колева, доц. д-р Блага Джорова, д-р Ева Жечева

INFLUENCE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PEDAGOGICAL FEATURES OF STUDENTS ON THEIR ACTIVITY IN SELF-EDUCATION

Dr. Iryna Sereda, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Svitlana Karskanova, Assoc. Prof.

CENTRALISATION AND DECENTRALISATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HUNGARY AND GERMANY

Carla Liege Rodrigues Pimenta, Prof. Dr. Zolt†n R–nay, Prof. Dr. Andr†s Nmet

ЗА ПРИОБЩАВАНЕТО, ОБУЧЕНИЕТО И РАЗВИТИЕТО НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ С ИНТЕЛЕКТУАЛНИ ЗАТРУДНЕНИЯ

Златкова-Дончева, К. (2021). Приобщаване, обучение и развитие на деца и ученици с интелектуални затруднения. Бургас: Либра СКОРП, ISBN 978-954-471-705-6

Книжка 7s
CONCEPT OF PRESENT PRACTICE IN CHOOSING OF OPTIMAL NUMBER OF TUGS

Rino Bošnjak, Zvonimir Lušić , Filip Bojić, Dario Medić

S-101 CHARTS, DATABASE TABLES FOR S-101 CHARTS, AUTONOMOUS VESSEL

Vladimir Brozović, Danko Kezić, Rino Bošnjak, Filip Bojić

INFLUENCE OF HYDRO-METEOROLOGICAL ELEMENTS ON THE SHIP MANOEUVRING IN THE CITY PORT OF SPLIT

Zvonimir Lušić , Nenad Leder, Danijel Pušić, Rino Bošnjak

MEETING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS – EXPERIENCE FROM THE LARGEST SHIPPING COMPANIES

Katarina Balić , Helena Ukić Boljat, Gorana Jelić Mrčelić, Merica Slišković

OPTIMISING THE REFERENCE POINT WITHIN A JOURNAL BEARING USING LASER ALIGNMENT

Ty Aaron Smith , Guixin Fan , Natalia Nikolova , Kiril Tenekedjiev

REVIEW OF THE CURRENT INCREASE OF NOISE UNIT COST VALUES IN TRANSPORT

Luka Vukić , Ivan Peronja , Mihaela Bukljaš , Alen Jugović

TARGET DETECTION FOR VISUAL COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM

Miro Petković, Danko Kezić, Igor Vujović, Ivan Pavić

NEW RESULTS FOR TEACHING SHIP HANDLING USING FAST TIME SIMULATION

Knud Benedict , MichŽle Schaub , Michael Baldauf , Michael Gluch , Matthias Kirchhoff , Caspar Krüger

POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF ELECTRICALY DRIVEN FERRY, CASE STUDY

Tina Perić, Ladislav Stazić, Karlo Bratić

SITUATIONAL AWARENESS – KEY SAFETY FACTOR FOR THE OFFICER OF THE WATCH

Hrvoje Jaram, Pero Vidan, Srđan Vukša, Ivan Pavić

Книжка 7
ХАОС(ЪТ)

Проф. д.н. Йордан Колев

INCLUSIVE INTELLIGENCE

Dr. Aleksandar Krastev, Assist. Prof.

EDUCATION OF MORAL CULTURE OF STUDENT YOUTH IN THE CONDITIONS OF POLYCULTURAL SPACE

Dr. Natalia Bondarenko, Assoc. Prof. Yevhen Rozdymakha Dr. Lyudmila Oderiy, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Anatoly Rozdymakha, Assoc. Prof. Dilyana Arsova, PhD student

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN KOSOVO – RESEARCH OF TRAINING PROGRAMS AND TESTS

Prof. Bekim Samadraxha Veton Alihajdari Prof. Besim Mustafa

Книжка 6s
EVALUATION OF CRUISER TRAFFIC VARIABLES IN SEAPORTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA

Maja Račić, Katarina Balić, Mira Pavlinović, Antonija Mišura

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CONTRACTS FOR MARITIME TRANSPORT SERVICES. CHAIN OF CHARTER PARTIES

Svetlana Dimitrakieva, Ognyan Kostadinov, Christiana Atanasova

THE LIGHTSHIP MASS CALCULATION MODEL OF A MERCHANT SHIP BY EMPIRICAL METHODS

Vedran Slapničar , Katarina Zadro , Viktor Ložar , Ivo Ćatipović

ON EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN MARITIME COMMUNICATIONS AND THE GMDSS DURING THE COVID-19

Chavdar Alexandrov, Grozdyu Grozev, Georgi Dimitrov, Avgustin Hristov

AIR POLLUTANT EMISSION MEASUREMENT

Nikola Račić, Branko Lalić, Ivan Komar, Frane Vidović, Ladislav Stazić

ASSESSMENT OF LNG BUNKERING ACCIDENTS

Peter Vidmar, Andrej Androjna

EGR OPERATION INFLUENCE ON THE MARINE ENGINE EFFICIENCY

Delyan Hristov, Ivan Ivanov, Dimitar Popov

THE MEASUREMENT OF EXHAUST GAS EMISSIONS BY TESTO 350 MARITIME – EXHAUST GAS ANALYZER

Bruna Bacalja, Maja Krčum, Tomislav Peša, Marko Zubčić

PROPELLER LOAD MODELLING IN THE CALCULATIONS OF MARINE SHAFTING TORSIONAL VIBRATIONS

Nenad Vulić, Karlo Bratić, Branko Lalić, Ladislav Stazić

MODELING OF THE DEPENDENCE OF CO

Hristo Hristov, Ivailo Bakalov, Bogdan Shopov, Dobromir Yovkov

TECHNICAL DIAGNOSTICS OF MARINE EQUIPMENT WITH PSEUDO-DISCRETE FEATURES

Guixin Fan , Natalia Nikolova , Ty Smith , Kiril Tenekedjiev

CONTRIBUTION TO THE REDUCTION OF THE SHIP’S SWITCHBOARD BY APPLYING SENSOR TECHNOLOGY

Nediljko Kaštelan, Marko Zubčić, Maja Krčum, Miro Petković

THE STAND FOR FIN DRIVES ENERGY TESTING

Andrzej Grządziela , Marcin Kluczyk , Tomislav Batur

INTRODUCTION OF 3D PRINTING INTO MARINE ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION – A CASE STUDY

Ivica Kuzmanić, Igor Vujović, Zlatan Kulenović, Miro Petković

SHIPYARD CRANE MODELING METHODS

Pawel Piskur , Piotr Szymak , Bartosz Larzewski

Книжка 6
A STUDY OF PARENTS' READINESS TO RAISE CHILDREN WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES

Dr. Maryana Buinyak, Assist. Prof. Prof. Dr. Svitlana Myronova

TEACHERS' PERSPECTIVE ON THE EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF ONLINE TEACHING

Dr. Julien-Ferencz Kiss, Prof. Dr. Florica Orțan, Dr. Laurențiu Mˆndrea

ПСИХОЛОГО-ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ ПРАВИЛА, МОДЕЛИ НА ДОБРИ ПРАКТИКИ И ПРЕПОРЪКИ ПРИ РАБОТАТА И ОБУЧЕНИЕТО НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ С ПОВЕДЕНЧЕСКИ РАЗСТРОЙСТВА

Тричков, Ив., 2019. Психолого-педагогически правила, модели на добри прак- тики и препоръки при работата и обучението на деца и ученици

Книжка 5
ФИДАНА ДАСКАЛОВА ЗА ПЕДАГОГИКАТА

Маргарита Колева, Йордан Колев

ВОЕННОМОРСКОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ – ЕДИН РАЗЛИЧЕН ПОГЛЕД

Кожухаров, А. (2021). Личните академични документи на българската военна образователна система (1892 – 1946). Варна: ВВМУ, ISBN 978-619-7428-55-1

Книжка 4
Книжка 3
НЕВРОДИДАКТИКА

Наталия Витанова

МОНТЕСОРИ МЕТОДЪТ И ПРИОБЩАВАЩАТА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА СРЕДА

Балканска, Н. (2020). Монтесори методът и приобщаващата образователна среда. София: ИК „Феномен“, ISBN: 978- 954-549-144-3

ЗА АСИСТИРАЩИТЕ И ИНФОРМАЦИОННИТЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Сивакова, В. (2020). Асистиращи и информационни технологии

Книжка 2
ОВЛАДЯВАНЕ НА КЛЮЧОВИ КОМПЕТЕНЦИИ ПРИ ОРИЕНТИРАНЕ В СВЕТА

Стоянова, М. (2019). Овладяване на ключови компетенции при ориентиране в света. София: Авангард принт, ISBN 978-954-337-398-7 374

Книжка 1
BULGARIAN SCHOOL – SHOWCASE OF IDENTITY

Veska Gyuviyska, Nikolay Tsankov

ЗА ИЗБОРА НА УЧЕБЕН КОМПЛЕКТ ПО БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕЗИК И ЛИТЕРАТУРА В НАЧАЛЕН ЕТАП. И ЗА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО

Георгиева, А. (2020). Съвременни проекции на обучението по български език

КОНТРОЛ НА СТРЕСА. ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКИ И УПРАВЛЕНСКИ РАКУРСИ

Стоянов, В. (2020). Управление на стреса в организацията. Психологически и управленски ракурси. 198 cтр., Варна: Стено, ISBN 978-619-241-119-0

2020 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
EDUCATIONAL REASONS FOR EARLY SCHOOL DROP-OUT

Maria Teneva, Zlatka Zhelyazkova

ДИАГНОСТИКА НА БЪРНАУТ СИНДРОМ ПРИ ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИТЕ СПЕЦИАЛИСТИ – СТРАТЕГИИ ЗА СПРАВЯНЕ С ХРОНИЧНИЯ СТРЕС НА РАБОТНОТО МЯСТО

Янакиев, Ю. (2019). Диагностика на бърнаут синдром при педагогическите специалисти. Стратегии за справяне с хроничния стрес на работното

Книжка 7s
TEACHING CHALLENGES IN SPORTS EDUCATION DURING THE PANDEMIC COVID-19

Evelina Savcheva, Galina Domuschieva-Rogleva

THE DIFFERENCES IN STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES ABOUT ONLINE TEACHING DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Aleksić Veljković Aleksandra , Slađana Stanković , Irena Golubović-Ilić , Katarina Herodek

ONLINE EDUCATION DURING PANDEMIC, ACCORDING TO STUDENTS FROM TWO BULGARIAN UNIVERSITIES

Antoaneta Getova¹ , Eleonora Mileva² , Boryana Angelova-Igova²

Книжка 7
ПОДГОТОВКАТА НА ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ КАДРИ ЗА ПРЕДУЧИЛИЩНИТЕ ВЪЗПИТАТЕЛНИ ЗАВЕДЕНИЯ ПРЕЗ ПЕРИОДА 1944 – 1991 ГОДИНА

Въчева, С. (2019). Подготовката на педагогически кадри за предучилищните възпитателни заведения през периода

ПАЗАРНИ МЕХАНИЗМИ В УЧИЛИЩНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ. ТЕОРЕТИКО-ПРИЛОЖНИ ВЪПРОСИ

Първанова, Й. (2020) Пазарни механизми в училищното образование. Теоретико-приложни въпроси. София: Колбис, ISBN 978-619-7284-35-5

Книжка 6
TEACHERS ATTITUDES ABOUT INTEGRATED APPROACH IN TEACHING

Emina Kopas-Vukašinović, Aleksandra Mihajlović, Olivera Cekić-Jovanović

ЗА ДОСТЪПА ДО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ СЪС СПЕЦИАЛНИ ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИ ПОТРЕБНОСТИ

Янкова, Ж. (2019). Детерминанти в достъпа до образование на деца и

Книжка 5
КОНЦЕПТУАЛНИ МОДЕЛИ ЗА РАЗРАБОТВАНЕ НА ПОЗНАВАТЕЛНИ ОНЛАЙН ИГРИ В ОБЛАСТТА НА КУЛТУРНОТО НАСЛЕДСТВО

Детелин Лучев, Десислава Панева-Мариновa, Радослав Павлов Гита Сенка Лилия Павлова

ТАЛАНТЛИВ ПЕДАГОГ И КУЛТУРЕН ДЕЕЦ

Севда Чобанова, Любен Десев

Книжка 4
A CONTINUUM OF APPROACHES TO SCHOOL INSPECTIONS: CASES FROM EUROPE

Rossitsa Simeonova, Yonka Parvanova Martin Brown, Sarah Gardezi, Joe O’Hara, Gerry McNamara Laura del Castillo Blanco Zacharoula Kechri, Eleni Beniata

V. O. SUKHOMLYNSKY EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM AS А FORMING BASIS FOR PERSONALITY MORAL QUALITIES

(On the occasion of the 100th anniversary) Svitlana Surgova, Olena Faichuk

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2019 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
Книжка 7
МОДЕЛ НА РАБОТА В ИНТЕРКУЛТУРНА СРЕДА

(Научноизследователска саморефлексия)

RISK FACTORS FOR EARLY SCHOOL LEAVING IN BULGARIA

Elena Lavrentsova, Petar Valkov

ПРИНОСИ НА ЕЛКА ПЕТРОВА ЗА БЪЛГАРСКОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

(100 години от рождението на проф. д.п.н. Елка Петрова – 27.10.1919 – 21.12.2012)

СВОЕОБРАЗЕН ВРЪХ В МЕТОДИКАТА НА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО ПО БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕЗИК В НАЧАЛНИТЕ КЛАСОВЕ

Христозова, Г. (2018). Обучението по български език в I – IV клас (граматика, правопис, правоговор, пунктуация). Габрово: ЕКС-ПРЕС

ИЗМЕРЕНИЯ НА КОНТРОЛНАТА ДЕЙНОСТ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Гьорева, Р. (2019). Контролната дейност в образованието. Благоевград: Макрос. ISBN 978-954-561-471-2

НАСОКИ ЗА ПРИОБЩАВАНЕ НА МАРГИНАЛНИ СЕМЕЙНИ ОБЩНОСТИ В ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИТЕ ИНСТИТУЦИИ

Нунев, Й. (2019). Насоки за приобщаване на маргинални семейни общности в образователните институции. Велико Търново: Св. св. Кирил и Методий, ISBN 978-619-208-186-7

Книжка 6
ДИОФАНТОВИ УРАВНЕНИЯ И СИСТЕМИ ДИОФАНТОВИ УРАВНЕНИЯ – ТЕОРЕТИЧНИ АСПЕКТИ И МЕТОДИЧЕСКА ПРОЕКЦИЯ В НАЧАЛНИЯ ЕТАП НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Владимира Ангелова. (2018). Диофантови уравнения и системи диофантови уравнения – теоретични аспекти и методическа проекция в начален етап на образование. Пловдив: Паисий Хилендарски, ISBN 978-619-202-394-2

ЕДНА НОВА КНИГА ЗА ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИТЕ УМЕНИЯ НА УЧИТЕЛИТЕ

Николай Колишев. (2018). Теория на педагогическите умения на учителите. София: Захарий Стоянов, ISBN: 9789540912066

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА ИЗСЛЕДОВАТЕЛСКИЯ ПОДХОД ПРИ ОБУЧЕНИЕ НА СТУДЕНТИ ПЕДАГОЗИ

(върху примера на обучение по академичната дисциплина „Съвременни аспекти на гражданското образование“ на студенти педагози)

LEARNING MATURITY

Alina G“mbuță Daniela-Carmen Berințan Marijana Mikulandra Krzysztof Kij Katja Sivka

Книжка 2
ДЕТЕТО И ПЕДАГОГИКАТА

Рашева-Мерджанова, Ян., Петкова, Ил. & Господинов, Вл. (съст.). (2018). Детето и педагогиката. София: Просвета, ISBN 978-954-01-3806-0

Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ КОЛЕГИ,

Редакционната колегия на списание „Педаго- гика“ ви честити Новата 2019 година! Пожела- ваме ви от сърце тя да бъде щастлива, успешна и благословена! През отминалата юбилейна 2018 г. публику- вахме редица стойностни материали на универ- ситетски преподаватели, учители, разнородни специалисти, работещи в сферата на образова- нието, докторанти. Отбелязани бяха поредица от тематични конференции и юбилейни празни- ци. Получихме и международно признание чрез включването на списанието

УЧЕНИЧЕСКО САМОУПРАВЛЕНИЕ

Желязкова-Тея, Т. & Банчева, М. (2018). Ученическото самоуправление. София: Аз-буки. ISBN: 978-619-7065-20-6

2018 година
Книжка 9
ПРАВАТА НА ДЕТЕТО ПРЕЗ ПОГЛЕДА НА СТУДЕНТИ ПЕДАГОЗИ

Йорданка Николова, Даниела Рачева

Книжка 8
СПОДЕЛЕНО МНЕНИЕ

Николова, М. & Михалева, Б. (2018). С увереност срещу агресията и кон-

Книжка 7
РАДОСТТА ОТ ОБЩУВАНЕТО НА ЧУЖД ЕЗИК В ДЕТСТВОТО

Екатерина Софрониева, Христина Белева

НОВО ТЕОРЕТИКО-ПРАКТИЧЕСКО ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА ДЕТСКОТО ТВОРЧЕСТВО

Енгелс-Критидис, Р. (2018). Децата и творчеството. Юбилеен сборник в чест

ПРОФ. Д-Р ЕЛЕНА РУСИНОВА-БАХУДЕЙЛА

Розалина Енгелс-Критидис

Книжка 6
ПОЗИТИВНА УЧЕБНА СРЕДА

Валентина Шарланова

SENIOR CITIZENS’ EXISTENTIAL NEEDS AND EDUCATION FOR THE MEANING OF LIFE

Joanna Łukasik, Norbert Pikuła, Katarzyna Jagielska

Книжка 5
ПЛАНОМЕРНО ПСИХИЧЕСКО РАЗВИТИЕ

(По случай 115 г. от рождението на П.Я. Галперин)

ПАРАДИГМАТА СЕМИОТИКА – ЕЗИК – ДЕТЕ ПРИ 6 – 7-ГОДИШНИТЕ

Жоржетина Атанасова, Любимка Габрова

ПАРАРОДИТЕЛСКАТА ГРИЖА ВЪВ ФОКУСА НА ЕДИН СОЦИАЛНОПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ АНАЛИЗ

Ковачка, Ю. (2017). Социалнопедагогически проблеми при деца с парародителска грижа. Благоевград: УИ „Неофит Рилски“, 144 стр. ISBN: 9789540001340

Книжка 4
ДЕТСКИ КОНФЕРЕНЦИИ

Боряна Иванова

СТЕРЕОТИПИЗАЦИЯ НА ЕТНИЧЕСКИТЕ ВЗАИМООТНОШЕНИЯ ПРИ СЪВРЕМЕННИТЕ МЛАДИ БЪЛГАРИ

Зорница Ганева. (2017). Стереотипизация на етническите взаимоотношения при съвременните млади българи. София: Елестра. ISBN 978-619-7292-03-9

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
СЪВРЕМЕННИ МЕТАМОРФОЗИ НА ВЗАИМООТНОШЕНИЯТА В ДЕТСКАТА ГРУПА

Веселина Иванова, Виолета Кърцелянска-Станчева

SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES AS SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS

Emilj Sulejmani Shikjerije Sulejmani

ОТНОСНО УСЕТА ЗА БРОЕНЕ

Петър Петров, Мима Трифонова

НАСИЛИЕТО НЕ РЕШАВА КОНФЛИКТИ

Дронзина, Т., Михалева, Б. (2017). Защо медиация? София: Сиела. ISBN 978-954-28-2482-4

Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ КОЛЕГИ И ПРИЯТЕЛИ,

Редакционната колегия на сп.„Педагогика“ Ви честити Новата 2018 г. Пожелаваме ви тя да бъде здрава, щедра и благословена! Тази година списанието чества своя юбилей – 90 години от неговото публикуване за първи път през 1928 г. с името „Народна просвета“. От деня на създаване до сега, то отразява актуал- ните проблеми на педагогическата наука и прак- тика и остава верен спътник на хиляди научни работници, учители, докторанти. Вярваме, че силата на творческата ни енергия ще пом

ДОБРИ ПРАКТИКИ „ПАРТНЬОРСТВО РОДИТЕЛИ – УЧИЛИЩЕ“

Мехмед Имамов, Калинка Гайтанинчева

2017 година
Книжка 9
ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКОТО УЧЕНИЕ НА Й. ФР. ХЕРБАРТ – ИСТОРИЯ И СЪВРЕМЕННОСТ

(По повод 240 г. от неговото рождение) Невена Филипова

Книжка 8
ЧЕТЯЩИЯТ СТУДЕНТ, ЧЕТЯЩОТО ДЕТЕ – ЕДНО МАЛКО ПРОЗОРЧЕ, ЕДНА ВЕЛИЧЕСТВЕНА ГЛЕДКА

Мариана Мандева, Боряна Туцева, Габриела Николова, Цветелина Ковачева

Книжка 7
ДИДАКТИЧЕСКИ КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТИ

Нели Митева, Наталия Витанова

Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ИЗСЛЕДОВАТЕЛСКО ОБУЧЕНИЕ В АКАДЕМИЧНА СРЕДА

(Научно-теоретична рефлексия) Румяна Неминска

ПРИНОС В ПСИХОЛОГИЯТА НА ТВОРЧЕСТВОТО

(120 години от рождението на Лев Семьонович Виготски) Любен Десев

ЛЕВ СEМЬОНОВИЧ ВИГОТСКИ – ПСИХОЛОГ И НА ХХI ВЕК

(по случай 120 години от рождението му)

ИСКУССТВО В ЖИЗНИ ЛЮДЕЙ

Гульнар Омарова

НОВА И ПОЛЕЗНА КНИГА

Йонка Първанова

ПРИНОСЕН ТРУД КЪМ МЕТОДИКАТА НА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО ПО БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕЗИК И ЛИТЕРАТУРА В НАЧАЛНОТО УЧИЛИЩЕ

М. Мандева (2017). Методика на обучението по български език и литература – I – IV клас. Начално ограмотяване. В. Търново: УИ „Св. св. Кирил и Методий“, 120 стр.

ЕДНО ФУНДАМЕНТАЛНО ИНТЕГРАЛНО ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА РОЛЯТА НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО ЗА РАЗВИТИЕТО НА НООСФЕРНИЯ ИНТЕЛЕКТ

Марга Георгиева, Сава Гроздев. (2016). Морфодинамиката за развитието на ноосферния интелект. София: Изток-Запад, ISBN 978-619-152-869-1

Книжка 4
Книжка 3
СИСТЕМАТИЧНО ВЪВЕДЕНИЕ В ОБЩАТА И ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКАТА СИНЕРГЕТИКА

Любен Десев (2015). Синергетика. Въведение и речник. 777 термина. София: ИК „Екопрогрес“. 464 с. ISBN 978-954-2970-37-8

Книжка 2
ПРОБЛЕМИ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВИ В РАЗВИТИЕТО НА ХУДОЖЕСТВЕНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ У НАС ПРЕЗ ПОГЛЕДА НА ДЕТСКИЯ И НАЧАЛНИЯ УЧИТЕЛ

Теодора Власева, Даниела Гирджева-Валачева, Мария Калоферова, Найден Младенов, Илияна Шотлекова

ЗАКЪСНЯЛО ПРИЗНАНИЕ

Доц. д-р Емилия Николова

Книжка 1
ФАКТОРИ ЗА УСПЕШНО ПРИЛАГАНЕ НА СМЕСЕНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова Лъчезар Лазаров

ЗА СТОПЛЕНИТЕ ПЪТЕКИ КЪМ ЛИТЕРАТУРНОТО ПОЗНАНИЕ

Радев, Радослав. 2015. Технология на методите в обучението по литература. Варна: Славена, 247 с., ISBN 978-619-190-041-1

2016 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
АНТРОПОЛОГИЯ НА ВЪЗПИТАНИЕТО

Кристоф Вулф. (2016). Антропология на възпитанието. София: издателство „Изток-Запад“

ВЕРСИИТЕ В БИОГРАФИИТЕ НА ЛИЧНОСТТА

Другите в биографията на личността (2015), под общата редакция

Книжка 7
IBM SPSS STATISTICS ПРЕЗ ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИЯ ПОГЛЕД НА ДОЦ. Д-Р ЗОРНИЦА ГАНЕВА

Зорница Ганева (2016). Да преоткрием статистиката с IBM SPSS Statistics. София: Елестра. 712 стр. ISBN 978-619-7292-01-5

НАЧАЛНОТО ОГРАМОТЯВАНЕ – „КЛЮЧ“ ЗА УСПЕШЕН ЖИВОТ В ПРОМЕНЯЩИЯ СЕ СВЯТ

Мариана Мандева, Диляна Гаджева (2016). Начално ограмотяване

ОТ „ЧУДНА И ДИВНА ДАСКАЛЕТИНКА“ ДО ПЕДАГОГИКА ЗА НАЦИОНАЛНО СЛУЧВАНЕ

Виолета Атанасова (2015) Петко Славейков за образованието. Шумен: Унивeрситетско издателство „Епископ Константин Преславски. 208 с. ISBN 978-619-201-051-5

Книжка 6
УЧИЛИЩЕ ЗА ЧЕТЕНЕ

Петя Георгиева Христина Димитрова

ПРАВО В ДЕСЕТКАТА

Ако обичате да правите викторини с интересни езикови въпро- си или да печелите басове, с този прост въпрос можете да ударите право в десетката. Как е правилно: деветка или девятка, десетка или десятка? Въпросът е идеален за басове, защото поне половината българи употребяват грешните форми девятка и десятка (по резултати от търсене в Гугъл), а друга част погрешно смятат, че двойките думи са дублети. Объркването произтича от грешна аналогия с явлението променливо я, което е наследник на ста

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
СИНЕРГЕТИКА – НОВО НАУЧНО ПОЗНАНИЕ

(Синергетика – въведение и речник, София: ИК Екопрогрес, 2015 г.)

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
НОВА ДИНАМИЧНА МОДИФИКАЦИЯ В ГРАНИЦИТЕ НА „АЗ-КОНЦЕПЦИЯТА“ НА МАТЕМАТИЧЕСКОТО МОДЕЛИРАНЕ

Марга Георгиева & Сава Гроздев. (2015). Морфодинамиката за развитието на ноосферния интелект, София: Марга Георгиева. 323 стр. ISBN 9786199052204

Книжка 1
IN MEMORIAM

На 10.12.2015 г. ни напусна нашият колега и приятел проф. д-р Иван Пет ков Иванов. Той беше уважаван учен и експерт в областта на педагогическите науки – автор на 10 монографии, 8 учебника, 10 учебни помагала, 6 студии и над 100 статии в специализирани периодич- ни издания и научни сборници; участник в 28 между- народни и национални проекта; председател и член на експертни групи към НАОА, член на редакционната ко- легия на сп. „Педагогика“. Проф. д-р Иван Иванов беше уважаван и оби

2015 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
РУСЕНСКИЯТ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ

Златоживка Здравкова

Книжка 7
ДИСКУСИЯТА В УРОКА ПО ЛИТЕРАТУРА

Огняна Георгиева-Тенева

Книжка 6
УЧИТЕЛЯТ ПРАВИ УЧИЛИЩЕТО

ЕЗИКОВАТА ГРАМОТНОСТ НА МАЛКИЯ УЧЕНИК – „КЛЮЧ“ ЗА ОТГОВОРЕН И УСПЕШЕН ЖИВОТ В ПРОМЕНЯЩИЯ СЕ СВЯТ

ГОТОВНОСТ ЗА ОГРАМОТЯВАНЕ

Екатерина Чернева

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЕ МЕЖДУ ИСТОРИЯ, АКАДЕМИЗЪМ И РЕАЛНИ ПРАКТИКИ В СОЦИАЛНОПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКАТА ДЕЙНОСТ

Академични полета на социалната педагогика, съставител: проф. д.п.н. Клавдия Сапунджиева, научна редакция: проф. дпн Клавдия Сапунджиева, проф. д-р Нели Бояджиева, гл. ас. д-р Марина Пиронкова,

НОВА КНИГА

Клавдия Сапунджиева

Книжка 1
ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: THEORY AND REALITY

Inna Leonidovna Fedotenko

ОТЗИВ ЗА КНИГАТА „ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЕН ДИЗАЙН (КОНЦЕПТУАЛНИ ОСНОВАНИЯ И ПРАКТИЧЕСКИ РЕШЕНИЯ)“

Димова, Д. (2013). Образователен дизайн (концептуални основания

2014 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
Книжка 7
ЗАЕДНО МОЖЕМ ПОВЕЧЕ

Диана Смиленова

Книжка 6
УСПЕШНИЯТ УЧИТЕЛ – МЕЖДУ ПРОФЕСИОНАЛНАТА НОРМА И СТРАСТТА ДА ПРЕПОДАВАШ

Проф. д-р Ангел Петров е преподавател по методика на обучението по български език в СУ „Св. Климент Охридски“. Ръководител е на най- старата катедра по методика на филологически- те дисциплини в страната – Катедрата по ме-

Книжка 5
ВЪЗГЛЕДИТЕ НА ЖАН-ЖАК РУСО И ЛЮБЕН КАРАВЕЛОВ ЗА ВЪЗПИТАНИЕТО

Посвещава се на 180-ата годишнина от рождението на Любен Каравелов (1834 – 1879) Виолета Атанасова

LE PROJET PÉDAGOGIQUE, SOURCE DE MOTIVATION DANS L’ENSEIGNEMENT ET L’APPRENTISSAGE DU FLE

THE EDUCATIONAL PROJECT, MEANS OF MOTIVATION IN TEACHING AND LEARNING FLE

LA PÉDAGOGIE DU PROJET ET LA MOTIVATION DES ÉLÈVES POUR L’APPRENTISSAGE DU FRANÇAIS

PROJECT PEDAGOGY AND PUPILS’ MOTIVATION IN LEARNING FRENCH

Книжка 4
е от непосредствената област на науките философия, социология и епистемо- логия. Втората трактовка по същество се отнася до моделирането в соци- ална среда като средство за прилагане на познанието за закономерностите на обществата, групите и индивидите. Понятието модел при втората трактовка и разликата между него и методите е, че моделът има по-цялостно приложе- ние, включвайки в себе си методите,

Социална парадигма Социални методи Социален модел (с приложна функция)

ТРИНАДЕСЕТИ МЕЖДУНАРОДНИ ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ ЧЕТЕНИЯ

МАРТ, 2014 ГОДИНА, ТБИЛИСИ, ГРУЗИЯ

КАЖДЫЙ ДЛЯ МЕНЯ УЧИТЕЛЬ

Ш.А.Амонашвили

Книжка 3
АНТОАНЕТА ЙОВЧЕВА (1952 – 2014)

След трудна борба с тежката болест ни напусна един добър и мил човек, една светла личност – Анто- анета Йовчева, нашата обичана колежка Тони. Нейните колеги и приятели, многобройните автори и сътрудници на сп. „Начално образование“ и на сп. „Педагогика“ ще запазят завинаги спомена за нейната приветлива усмивка, за нейната отзивчивост и преда- ност към работата, за нейната широка култура и стре- меж към познание, към развитие. Родена на 20 март 1952 г. в София в интелигентно се- мей

Книжка 2
ПОСТМОДЕРНИЗЪМ И ВЪЗПИТАНИЕ

Клавдия Сапунджиева

ДЕТСКИ УНИВЕРСИТЕТИ

Боряна Иванова

ПРОФ. Д-Р ЕЛКА ПЕТРОВА

Има личности, в сиянието на които се оглеж- дат цяла плеада последователи, възпитаници, колеги; има личности, без които животът става по беден, дните по-еднообразни, защото в сър- цето остава празно място. Такава личност е професор, доктор на педа- гогическите науки Елка Петрова – най–големият ерудит в областта на предучилищното възпита - ние, учен с международно значение. Дълги години ще свеждаме глави пред нейна- та обаятелна личност, с искрена признателност ще си спомняме свидните

МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЙ ЦЕНТР ГУМАННОЙ ПЕДАГОГИКИ

Международният център „Хуманна педагогика“ организира XIII педаго- гически четения в периода 20 – 23.03.2014 г. в гр.Тбилиси, Грузия. Форумът се организира със съдействието на грузинското правителство. „Учителят“ е темата, която ще обедини участниците: учители, експерти, родители, универ- ситетски преподаватели, представители на педагогическата общност от мно- го страни, за да се осъществи дискусия за мисията на съвременния учител в съвременния образователен контекст. Ръководството на

Книжка 1
ОСНОВНИ ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКИ НА МОБИЛНОТО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова Лъчезар Лазаров

2013 година
Книжка 9
УЧИТЕЛИ ВЪЗРОЖДЕНЦИ В ТЪРНОВО

Венка Кутева-Цветкова

Книжка 8
ДИМИТЪР ДОНЧЕВ – С ВЪЗХИТА ЗА БЪЛГАРСКИЯ УЧИТЕЛ

100 ГОДИНИ ОТ РОЖДЕНИЕТО НА ДИМИТЪР ЕВСТАТИЕВ ДОНЧЕВ (5.10.1913 – 15.02.1997)

Книжка 7
„СЛЪНЦЕТО“ НА ВЪЗПИТАТЕЛНАТА СИСТЕМА В ТВУ – РАКИТОВО

85 ГОДИНИ ОТ РОЖДЕНИЕТО НА АНГЕЛ УЗУНОВ (1928 – 1999)

ЦЕННОСТИ И ДУХОВНО-НРАВСТВЕНО РАЗВИТИЕ НА МАЛКИЯ УЧЕНИК

Марияна Ешкенази, Гергана Фиданова, Марияна Вишева, Цветанка Годжилова

МАЛКИЯТ УЧЕНИК ЧЕТЕ

Марияна Механджиева Венета Велева

С БАБА И ДЯДО В КЛАС

Цветелин Горанов, Таня Илиева, Цветанка Берова, Нели Иванова, Борка Бончева

РОД РОДА НЕ ХРАНИ, НО ТЕЖКО МУ, КОЙТО ГО НЯМА!

Диляна Вачкова Евелина Димитрова

ДА ПОМОГНЕМ НА ДЕЦАТА ДА ОТВОРЯТ СЪРЦАТА СИ

Иванка Дебелушина Нина Маврикова

ДОБРОТО Е У ВСЕКИ

Мария Наскова

ОТЛИЧЕН ПЕДАГОГ, ПСИХОЛОГ И ПСИХОТЕРАПЕВТ

ДОЦ. СВЕТОСЛАВ СТАМЕНОВ (1939 – 2013)

Книжка 6
ТЕОРЕТИКО-ПРИЛОЖНИ ПРОБЛЕМИ НА КОНСТРУИРАНЕТО НА ТЕСТ ЗА НАЦИОНАЛНО ВЪНШНО ОЦЕНЯВАНЕ ПО „ЧОВЕКЪТ И ОБЩЕСТВОТО“ ЗА 4. КЛАС (2013)

Ваня Петрова, Цонка Каснакова, Мариан Делчев Жана Минчева Радостина Стоянова, Рада Димитрова Мария Темникова

MEDIA IN PRESCHOOL AGE OF CHILD’S LIFE

Sonja Petrovska Jadranka Bocvarova

Книжка 5
ШАЛВА АЛЕКСАНДРОВИЧ АМОНАШВИЛИ – УЧИТЕЛ ОТ БЪДЕЩЕТО

В сложното битие на науката и метамор- фозите на социалната реалност, неотменими и общовалидни остават само най-стойностни- те постижения и безспорни истини, които не само маркират и остойностяват територията на човешко познание, но извисяват самия чо- век, поддържат неговата вяра в доброто, под- хранват чувството му за собствена значимост, укрепват неговия дух. Приемайки извечните послания на класи- ческата философско-педагогическа мъдрост и дълбоко обвързан с педагогическата р

МАНИФЕСТ ГУМАННОЙ ПЕДАГОГИКИ

Преамбула 25 лет тому назад группа учителей новаторов провозгласила манифест „Пе- дагогика сотрудничества“ (Переделкино, 1986 год). В последующие годы были опубликованы отчеты встреч учителей новаторов, в которых рассматри- вались разные аспекты педагогики сотрудничества: „Демократизация лично- сти“ (Цинандали, Телавский район, Грузия, 1987 год), „Методика обновления“ (Москва, 1988 год), „Войдем в новую школу“ (Краснодарский край, 1988 год). Идеи педагогики сотрудничества воодушевленно

ПОРТФОЛИОТО НА УЧЕНИКА КАТО ПРОЦЕС НА САМОПОЗНАНИЕ

Радка Топалска Емилия Вълкова, Албена Атанасова

ДОПИРНИ СВЕТОВЕ

Албена Димитрова Стилияна Гронева

ПРЕДИ ГОДИНА И СЕГА

Веселка Аршинкова

Книжка 4
СВЕЩЕНИК ГЕОРГИ МАРИНОВ ПОЛУГАНОВ – ОСНОВАТЕЛЯТ НА УЧИЛИЩЕТО И ПЪРВИЯТ УЧИТЕЛ В ПОЛИКРАЙЩЕ

Георги Георгиев Трифонка Попниколова Марияна Георгиева–Гроссе

ЕВРОПЕЙСКИ ПРИКАЗКИ

Светла Попова

Книжка 3
ПОЗДРАВИТЕЛЕН АДРЕС

Има събития и дати, които не се забравят, които оставaт в душите на- веки. Такъв е бил и денят преди 40 го- дини – 15 април 1973 год., когато ОДЗ 7 „Детелина“ отваря врати и екипът поема тежката, но благородна задача да изпълни със светлина умовете и сърцата на децата. 40 години е достойна възраст за един човешки живот, за една инсти- туция като ОДЗ 7 „Детелина“. В този празничен ден имаме възможност със самочувствие да проследим пътя на утвърждаването н

ДА ОПАЗИМ ДЕТСКОТО ЗДРАВЕ!

Мая Топалова, Симона Пейчева

КАК ДА ОТГЛЕДАМЕ МАЛЪК ПРИРОДОЛЮБИТЕЛ?

Мадлена Николова Ани Цветкова

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ КОЛЕГИ, ПРИЯТЕЛИ И СЪМИШЛЕНИЦИ,

Редколегията на списание „Педагогика“ честити на всички Новата 2013 година и пожелава тя бъде щастлива, плодотворна, изпълнена с творчески пориви и нови изследователски проникновения!

ИЗКУСТВОТО ЗА ПРЕВЕНЦИЯ НА АГРЕСИВНОТО ПОВЕДЕНИЕ НА ДЕЦАТА

Евгения Миланова Виолета Николова Величка Радева

ПРИЯТЕЛСТВОТО В ЖИВОТА НА ДЕТЕТО

Даниела Димитрова Красимира Василева

ПРЕДАЙ НАТАТЪК

Вилдан Мехмедова

ЗАЕДНО ДА БЪДЕМ ДОБРИ

(ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКА СИТУАЦИЯ В ПОДГОТВИТЕЛНА ГРУПА)

ПРОФ. ДПН EЛКА ПЕТРОВА EДНА НЕЗАЛИЧИМА СЛЕДА В БЪЛГАРСКОТО ПРЕДУЧИЛИЩНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ (1919 – 2012)

Почина проф. дпн Елка Петрова (20.ХІІ.2012 г.) – на- шата любима учителка по изкуството да се живее пъл- ноценно и професионално, създателката на науката за предучилищното възпитание на българските деца, пре- красната жена и велика майка, Неповторима, единствена, съвършена – това е нашата Елка: Примерът за всички нас – хилядите нейни студенти и последователи ! Елка Петрова винаги е първа, винаги е оригинална и авангардна; през 1950–1952 г. поставя началото на Висшия мето

2012 година
Книжка 9
ПЕДАГОГЪТ – РИЦАР НА ДЕТСТВОТО

Януш Корчак бе написал, че животът на великите хора е като легендите: труден, но красив. И се оказва пророчески прав, сякаш е писал за себе си! Наследник на семейство с богата духовна култура и традиции, останал отрано без баща, той не просто се справя с несгодите на сирачеството, но развива у себе си три могъщи извора на живот: любов към свободата и справедливостта, страст към знанието и творчеството, отдаденост на децата и тяхното щастие. Лекарят Корчак лекува децата и душите им. Безплатн

ЯНУШ КОРЧАК – ВЕЛИК ХУМАНИСТ И ПЕДАГОГ

„Със сила и мощ поведох своя живот, който беше привидно неподреден, самотен и чужд. За син избрах идеята да служа на детето и неговото дело. Привидно загубих.“ Бе лекар, писател, мислител. Бе философ, учен, моралист. Издател. Възпи- тател и педагог. Бе герой. Бе скромен. Във всяка от тези области той има изключителни постижения. В течение на по- вече от четиридесет години работи като педагог и писател. Четиридесет години безкористно служене на слабите и беззащитните. Създава съвременна кон

ЕВОЛЮЦИЯ НА ПРАВАТА НА ДЕТЕТО

„Детето има право на сериозно отношение към проблемите му, на справедливото им решаване.“

THE KORCZAK’S RIGHT TO SOCIAL PARTICIPATION OF CHILDREN THE CITIZENSHIP OF CHILDREN

A speech by Marek Michalak, the Ombudsman for Children, given during the seminar„The Polish-Israeli pioneer in the fi eld of human rights, Janusz Korczak (1879–1942) and today’s Convention on Children’s Rights as the part of the international law“, Geneva, the 6 of June 2009

ЗА ДЕТЕТО, ДЕТСТВОТО ИЛИ НАУКА ЗА НЕГО?

В памет на Януш Корчак – по повод 70 г. от неговата смърт и 100 г. от създаването на „Дом за сираци“ във Варшава Албена Чавдарова

Книжка 8
CHANGES IN UNIVERSITY TEACHING – THE ROAD FROM KNOWLEDGE TO COMPETENCIES

Slađana Anđelković Zorica Stanisavljević Petrović

ДОСТОЕН ЖИВОТ, ОТДАДЕН НА ПРОСВЕЩЕНИЕТО… ПРОФ. СТОЙКА ЗДРАВКОВА – ЕДИН СЪВРЕМЕНЕН БУДИТЕЛ НА 70 ГОДИНИ

Неуморна и взискателна! Енергична и всеотдай- на! Работохолик и перфекционист! Това е проф. д-р Стойка Здравкова! Не е за вярване, че в началото на ноември 2012 година навърши 70 години. И не е слу- чайно това, че тази светла дата е непосредствено бли- зо до Деня на будителите. А това, че проф . Здравкова е съвременен български будител, е толкова безспорно и видимо! 70–годишнината ù е един чудесен повод ретрос- пективно да си припомним и проследим най-значи-

Книжка 7
ОЧАКВАНА И ПОЛЕЗНА

Емилия Василева

Книжка 6

Книжка 5
ЦЕННО ПОМАГАЛО ЗА ПСИХОЛОЗИ И ПЕДАГОЗИ (Надежден инструмент за диагностициране смисъла на живота)

Любен Десев Минчев, Борис. Тест на Дж. Крумбъг и Л. Махолик за смисъл в живота. Българска версия. Варна, ВСУ „Черноризец Храбър“,

ГЕОРГИ MАВРОВ ЖИВОТ, ОТДАДЕН НА НАУКАТА И ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Така най-общо, но и най-точно можем да охарак- теризираме дейността на ст. н. с. д-р Георги Петков Мавров. Той ни напусна неочаквано в края на април т.г. И до последния си ден не преставаше да се вълнува от проблемите на образованието. Споделяше инте- ресни мисли относно предстоящото приемане на За- кона за образованието. Пестелив на думи, но щедър на дела – това ясно проличава от неговата богата би- ография.

Книжка 4
ОЩЕ ЕДНА ИДЕЯ

Галина Стоянова

Книжка 3
С ИНОВАТИВЕН ПОГЛЕД КЪМ ЛИЧНОСТТА НА ДЕТЕТО

Маргарита Абрашева Любимка Габрова

БИЗНЕС ОБУЧЕНИЕ В ДЕТСКАТА ГРАДИНА

Красимира Костова Петя Драгоданова

ДЕТСКАТА БЕЗОПАСНОСТ

Любимка Габрова

БАБА ПРИКАЗКИ РАЗКАЗВА... (МИКС ОТ ПРИКАЗКИ)

Кева Захариева, Мария Мичева

Книжка 2
ДЕТЕ ПЪТУВА В АВТОМОБИЛА

Красимира Михайлова

ПРОТИВОПОСТАВЯНЕ

Пюрвя Ердниев Б. Ердниев „Нашата обща категория противопоставяне е едно от основните и необходими общи понятия, което улеснява регулирането и дори прави възможно, заедно с другите общи понятия, нашето здравомислие.“ И. П. Павлов Учителите от нашата страна познават смисъла на иновацията УДЕ (уголе- мяване на дидактичните единици). Ключ за решаване на конкретни въпроси на УДЕ се оказва чудесната дума- закон „противопоставяне“, употребена от академик Павлов за обясняване на

ЗДРАВКА НОВАКОВА – ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛ И ТВОРЕЦ

Седемдесетгодишният юбилей е вълнуващ повод да проследим трудния, богат и съдържателен професионално-творчески път на доц. д-р Здравка Новакова, да под- чертаем нейната важна роля за утвърждаване на дидактика на математиката като

IN MEMORIAM Иван Марев

Напусна ни проф. Иван Марев – философ, педагог, демократ, родолюбец. В далечната 1975 г., зареден с енергия, пълен с идеи, той създаде в Техническия

Книжка 1
ДЕЛЕГИРАНЕ НА ПРАВА ЧРЕЗ КОМИСИИТЕ В ДЕТСКАТА ГРАДИНА

Маргарита Абрашева Политиката, наречена управление на качеството, не е самоцел, нито поредна обра- зователна „мода“. Тя е практически необходима за поддържане от директора на учеб- ното заведение на един привлекателен образ в условията на конкуренция на пазара на учебни заведения. Това се отнася най-вече за детските градини. Политиката на упра- вление на качеството съдържа недостатъчно използван ресурс, включително за спечел- ване и запазване доверието на потребителя – родителите на децата,

ИНОВАЦИОННИ И ИНТЕРАКТИВНИ МЕТОДИ В КВАЛИФИКАЦИОННАТА ДЕЙНОСТ НА ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИЯ КОЛЕКТИВ

Стоилка Ташева, Севда Лукайчева Развиващото се с динамични темпове общество в днешно време налага необ- ходимостта от иновационни промени в областта на образованието. И в предучи- лищната педагогика все по-често се търсят алтернативни педагогически техноло- гии както за възпитанието и обучението на децата, така и при провеждането на квалификационната дейност на самите педагози. Използването на интерактивните методи дава възможност да се възлагат за- дачи, които предполагат съвместна работа,

ТОВА ТРЯБВА ДА ГО ЗНАЕ ВСЯКО ДЕТЕ

Татяна Атанасова, Иванка Пампова

НА УЛИЦАТА Е ОПАСНО

Таня Янчева, Зоя Кацарова