Педагогика

https://doi.org/10.53656/ped2022-8.06

2022/8, стр. 1032 - 1043

INTEGRATING INTERCULTURAL EDUCATION IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOL CURRICULUM

Bujar Adili
E-mail: bujar.3141@student.ugd.edu.mk
Faculty of Educational Sciences
Goce Delchev University
Stip North Macedonia
Sonja Petrovska
OrcID: 0000-0002-8931-078X
E-mail: sonja.petrovska@ugd.edu.mk
Faculty of Educational Sciences
Goce Delchev University
Stip North Macedonia
Gzim Xhambazi
E-mail: gezim.xhambazi@unite.edu.mk
Faculty of Educational Sciences
Goce Delchev University
Stip North Macedonia

Резюме: The paper investigated through which subjects intercultural education can best be applied in the primary school curriculum. Teachers' attitudes were investigated through 5 variables such as school cultural structure, gender, seniority, teacher’s prior intercultural education and teacher’s education degree. A 5 point Likert scale consisting of 6 items was used for data collection. This scale was applied to 217 primary school teachers in the Republic of North Macedonia. The ranking of subjects through which intercultural education is implemented was done through descriptive statistics. Differences in teachers' attitudes on subject ranking were tested through t-test and One Way ANOVA. The research results showed that teachers require another form of implementation of intercultural education (M=3.55) in addition to implementation through extracurricular activities (M=3.46). Teachers working in a multicultural school think that intercultural education should be implemented through an another form, while teachers working in a monocultural school think that intercultural education should be implemented in homeroom class. Teachers with "combined" intercultural education think that this education should be implemented through extracurricular activities, while teachers who have independently studied interculture think that intercultural education should be implemented through an another form.

Ключови думи: intercultural education; teacher; curriculum; subject

Introduction

Challenges for the future of the individual and society are reflected in the structure and quality of today's school, education system, education and teacher training. The common values of a united Europe, as well as the characteristics of modern society (democracy, individual, pluralism, openness, responsibility, identity, human resources…) are the starting points for structural changes in pedagogical theory and practice. The impact of the internationalization of education through the processes of preparing students for life and work in the international space, the strengthening of language and intercultural competencies, significantly affects the internationalization of the curriculum. According to Banks (Banks 1993; Banks & Banks 2002) the pedagogy of equality, as the creation of fair and equal educational conditions for all, the reform of the curriculum, as a new understanding of “truth and knowledge”, education for social justice, as a struggle against discrimination, prejudice, racism, etc. – are also dimensions of intercultural education that enable, by changing the approach and flexibility of the contents, an effective response to the different requirements of the participants in education. In this regard, the intercultural curriculum is one of the basic premises for the implementation of intercultural education in teaching practice.

Dantow, Hubbard and Mehan (2002) consider the creation of the curriculum as a coconstruction process, ie a process of joint creation that develops through interaction in a specific social context, while Miljak (2005) from the aspect of productive curriculum creation emphasizes the importance of methodology of its co-construction and construction as a dynamic process that has its own philosophy (which implies goal, tasks and expectations), methodology (which implies action and participation), practice (which refers to the occurrence, participation and co-creation of all relevant participants) and result (which assumes a state of inner satisfaction and competence).

In structuring the modern national/school curriculum, the contents, programs, work methods and teacher actions should be articulated, which will not only refer to the acquisition of knowledge, but, observing the world from different philosophical angles and breadths, in direct contacts will suspend various social stereotypes, prejudices and stigmatization among people (Previšić 2004). Stol and Fink (2000) emphasize the need for a school-parent partnership in building a network that includes two-way communication, counseling, learning assistance at home, involvement of parents in decision-making, and collaboration with community. Thus, the intercultural curriculum presupposes the inclusion of the specifics of social and cultural minorities in all areas of school work (Resman 2006) which includes teaching content and extracurricular activities, establishing rules for guiding and protecting members of minority communities, as well as determining fundamental life values among students.

Intercultural education in the primary school curriculum

Intercultural education at its core has two main points: It is education which recognizes, respects and celebrates the normality of diversity in all areas of human life. It “sensitises the learner to the idea that humans have naturally developed a range of different ways of life, customs and worldviews, and that this breadth of human life enriches all of us. It is education, which promotes equality and human rights, challenges unfair discrimination, and promotes the values upon which equality is built” (Tormey 2005, 3). Intercultural education is for all children irrespective of their ethnicity and their age. Language and talk are identified as a fundamental component of intercultural education. Tormey (2005) claims that intercultural education happens naturally through the “hidden curriculum” of the social and visual world within which the child lives. While it is possible and necessary to include intercultural ideas in the taught “formal curriculum”, the images and resources that surround the child are also crucial. In exploring the hidden curriculum it is important to note that “what is absent can be as important as what is present” (Tormey 2005, 4). The stages of curriculum construction according to Marsh (2009) would be: 1. need analysis (which depends on educational policy, parents, students, teachers and financial opportunities); 2. defining the intentions, goals and tasks; 3. methods selection (finding and organizing the contents); 4. result evaluation (formative and summative). Modern societies and their educational policies should take into account intercultural guidelines in constructing national and school curricula. A leading role in this should be played by pedagogues, teachers and school principals, which has not been the case so far.

Bennett (Hollins 2008) imposes four tasks for theorists and practitioners: revision of the existing curriculum, realization of equitable pedagogy, development of intercultural competencies of future teachers and achieving a degree of social equality. On the other hand, Dufour and Curtis (2012) warn that one of the main disadvantages of today's curricula is that they are often directed by political and educational centers. In this sense, the school curriculum should also protect students so that students can influence the course of the learning process, and not instead the educational bureaucracy or the academic egoists do it. The curriculum, however, is not a “package of knowledge” to be carried away from school, but a way to know how to live with that treasure (Previšić 2010, 173). Materials and didactic resources should promote equality and should not contain elements of discrimination that could create a sense of superiority (Aguado & Del Olmo 2009). They should be built on the foundations of different systems of knowledge and experience of students, to incorporate their history, knowledge and technology, to introduce students to cultural heritage, to focus on the development of respect for cultural identity, language and values, to impart knowledge about society as a whole to minority groups, to strive for the elimination of prejudices1). Teachers should try to use materials in accordance with the proposals for respect for diversity (Aguado & Del Olmo 2009). It is useful to introduce lessons and activities about different dialects, taboos and other cultural elements2).

The most common teaching resources are textbooks. First language textbooks should also have data on the country's minority ethnic groups (Helgason & Lässig 2009). Other textbooks, such as history, geography, and other social sciences, as well as science and mathematics, should contain the same. In all of them, on a certain level, intercultural topics from well-known scientists can be included. Research highlights cultural and geographical diversity in textbooks, including the need to highlight diversity not only among nations but also within nations. Helgason and Lässig (2009) emphasize that textbooks reflect the culture and social attitudes and can spread such attitudes. They argue that diversity in teaching should be visible not only through the attempt to include the opportunities of minority groups, but also through the inclusion of a critical perspective and understanding of how history is presented and understood. Each teaching material used should be reviewed, not only in terms of content, but also in terms of the way the text is written or the presentation of the film or music being studied. Even without an open purpose, they can influence the way they think about others, thus contributing to interculturality or creating and promoting stereotypes. According to De Leo (2010) teachers can opt for two approaches: the intracultural approach to a culture that goes deep, with an emphasis on language, family, religion, laws, heritage, history, etc., and the intercultural approach, which covers only several components of different cultures. Also known is the cross-cultural approach which involves exploring and comparing one component across a range of cultures, multicultural learning that affirms multiple identities related to life in a plural context, globalization and the heritage of minority communities. Transcultural learning involves exploring the common values and common elements of different cultures, overcoming differences and uniting in a human community.

In language teaching activities, teachers should encourage a shift between the language of instruction and the other (minority, foreign, surrounding language), use multilingual aids, use partially common terminology, include training in democratic citizenship, include lessons related to communication and comparative analysis of language, to develop multilingual creativity, to talk about the great works of literature in their native language (Beacco et al. 2016). In history teaching, the intercultural perspective can help illustrate the similarities and differences between cultures and develop an understanding of cultural diversity, through historical facts and ways of developing different countries, which also provides an awareness of the factors that have brought us together or separated us (Helgason & Lässig 2009). These views on the application of interculture in schools do not necessarily apply only to the teaching of languages and history. In minority schools, in fact, there is a great possibility for the application of pluralism in all forms of teaching because the majority of students are sufficiently developed at least two languages to understand the content.3 also recommends that, where possible and as far as possible, the student's mother tongue should be used. Aguado and Del Olmo (2009) give an example of promoting multilingualism in school with the help of posters written in many different languages. For example in English and other languages used in the community. In minority schools and especially in those that have both a minority and a majority population, this is a prerequisite for the creation of multilingual and thus intercultural education. Huber (2012) in that direction emphasizes that topics from the intercultural context can be integrated in any subject. History, geography, social subjects, and language are easy to adapt, but other subjects, such as music, math, and science, must be adapted.

Methodology

The research aimed to investigate through which subjects intercultural education can best be applied in the primary school curriculum. Teachers' attitudes were investigated through 5 variables such as school cultural structure, gender, seniority, teacher’s prior intercultural education and teacher’s education degree. A 5 point Likert scale consisting of 6 items was used for data collection. In the present study, the Cronbach Alpha coefficient was found to be 0.64. “In social sciences, the reliability coefficient of a scale is interpreted as α≥0.9 excellent, 0.7≤α <0.9 good, 0.6≤α <0.7 acceptable, 0.5≤α <0.6 poor, α <0.5 unacceptable” (Celik, & Iltar 2021, 256). In this context, the scale used for the current study is at an acceptable level. This scale was applied to 217 primary school teachers in the Republic of North Macedonia. The ranking of subjects through which intercultural education is implemented was done through descriptive statistics. Differences in teachers' attitudes on subject ranking were tested through t-test and One Way ANOVA.

Discussion of results

The scale for evaluating the forms for the implementation of intercultural education in the school consists of six claims.

Table 1. Descriptive parameters of implementation of intercultural education in primary school

ClaimNMSD1. as a compulsory subject2172.30.9862. as an optional subject2172.781.0603. in class2173.33.9854. interdisciplinary, across all subjects2173.121.1465. through extracurricular activities2173.461.0186. through an another form2173.551.182

The table above shows that the teachers achieved the highest arithmetic mean in the claim that interculture in primary school could be implemented "through an another form" (M=3.55, SD=1.182), then “through extracurricular activities” (M=3.46, SD=1.018), “in class” (M=3.33, SD=.985) and “interdisciplinary, across all subjects” (M=3.12, SD=1.146). Lower arithmetic mean teachers achieved in the claim that interculture in primary school could be conducted “as an optional subject” (M=2.78, M=1,060) and the lowest arithmetic mean achieved in the claim that interculture in primary school could be implemented “as compulsory subject” (M=2.30, SD=.986). On the other hand, most of the teachers or 57.1% completely or mainly agree that the interculture in the primary school could be implemented “through extracurricular activities”, and 52.5% of the teachers think that it can be implemented “through an another form”. Less than 50% of the teachers, ie 42.9% of them completely or mainly think that the interculture in the primary school could be implemented “in class” and a little more than one third or 36.4% think that it could be implemented “interdisciplinary through all subjects”. A smaller number of respondents or 27.2% think that interculture could be implemented “as an optional subject” while only 14.2% of teachers completely or mainly think that interculture in primary school could be implemented “as a compulsory subject”. Such results suggest that teachers are aware that interculture is not a subject and point to the conclusion that more forms of intercultural implementation should be considered in schools.

In order to determine the differences in the attitudes of the teachers according to the cultural structure of the school in which they work in relation to the forms of implementation of the interculture in the primary school, a t-test was performed.

Table 2. Teachers’ views on implementation of intercultural education according to school structure

ClaimMono-culturalschool(N=154)Multiculturalschool(N=63)tpMSDMSD1. as a compulsory subject2.441.0661.98.6603.120.002*2. as an optional subject2.95.9992.371.0973.833.000*3. in class3.46.9843.00.9163.194.002*4. interdisciplinary, across all subjects3.141.1613.101.118.239.8115. through extracurricular activities3.231.0454.02.684-5.522.000*6. through an another form3.311.1734.16.971-5.102.000*

*p<0.05

The test results show a statistically significant difference between teachers in 5 out of 6 claims whereby teachers working in a multicultural school achieved a higher mean (M=4.02, SD=.684, p<.05; M=4.16, SD=.971, p<.05;) compared to teachers working in a monocultural school (M=3.23, SD=1.045, p<.05; M=3.31, SD=1.173, p<.05) in claiming that interculture in a primary school could be implemented “through extracurricular activities” and “through an another form”. Teachers working in a monocultural school achieved a statistically higher mean (M=2.44, SD= 1.066, p<.05; M=2.95, SD=.999, p<.05; M=3.46, SD=.984, p<.05) compared to teachers working in a multicultural school (M=1.98, SD=.660, p<.05; M=2.37, SD=1.097, p<.05; M=3.00, SD=.916, p<.05) in the claim that interculture in primary school could be implemented “as a compulsory subject”, “as an optional subject” and “in class”. These results suggest that teachers working in a multicultural school have more informations on forms intercultural education can be implemented and lead to the conclusion that these teachers possess a higher level of intercultural competence in this matter.

In order to determine the differences in the attitudes of the teachers according to the gender regarding the forms of implementation of intercultural education in primary school, a t-test was conducted.

Table 3. Implementation of intercultural education according to gender

ClaimFemale(N=158)Male(N=59)tpMSDMSD1. as a compulsory subject2.24.9872.47.971-1.561.1202. as an optional subject2.971.0252.291.0014.378.000*3. in class3.50.9082.861.0424.404.000*4. interdisciplinary, across all subjects3.221.1712.861.0422.058.041*5. through extracurricular activities3.43.9603.531.165-.611.5426. through an another form3.471.1103.781.340-1.735.084

*p<0.05

The test results show a statistically significant difference between the teachers in 3 out of 6 claims where the female teachers achieved a higher mean (M=2.97, SD= 1.025, p<.05; M=3.50, SD=.908, p<.05; M=3.22, SD=1.171, p<.05) compared to to male teachers (M=2.29, SD=1.001, p<.05; M=2.86, SD=1.042, p<.05; M=2.86, SD=1.042, p<.05) in the claim that interculture in primary school could be implemented "as an optional subject", "in class" and "interdisciplinary, across all subjects". These results lead to the conclusion that female teachers showed a higher level of intercultural competence in this scale that examines attitudes regarding the forms of implementation of intercultural education in school.

In order to determine the differences in the attitudes of the teachers according to seniority regarding the forms of implementation of the intercultural education in primary school, a t-test was conducted.

Table 4. Implementation of intercultural education and seniority

ClaimUnder 20 years(N=152)Over 20 years(N=65)tpMSDMSD1. as a compulsory subject2.221.0562.49.773-1.849.0662. as an optional subject2.81.9262.721.329.547.5853. in class3.30.9823.40.997-.711.4784. interdisciplinary, across all subjects3.081.1883.231.042-.894.3735. through extracurricular activities3.271.0793.89.687-4.290.000*6. through an another form3.291.1724.17.961-5.333.000*

*p<0.05

The table above shows that teachers with more than 20 years of work experience achieved a higher mean than teachers with less than 20 years of work experience in 5 out of 6 claims, stating that interculture in primary school could be implemented “as compulsory subject”, “in class”, “interdisciplinary, through all subjects”, “through extracurricular activities” and “through an another form”. The test results show a statistically significant difference between teachers in 2 out of 6 claims where teachers with work experience over 20 years achieved a higher mean (M=3.89, SD=.687, p<.05; M=4.17, SD=.961 , p<.05) than teachers with work experience under 20 years (M= 3.27, SD=1.079, p<.05; M=3.29, SD=1.172, p<.05) in the claim that interculture in primary school could be implemented “through extracurricular activities” and “through an another form”. Such results suggest that teachers with more work experience have more information about the forms of implementation of intercultural education in school.

Differences in attitudes of the teachers according to education degree regarding the forms of implementation of the intercultural education in primary school were determined through One Way ANOVA.

Table 5. Implementation of intercultural education and teacher education degree

ClaimBachelor(N=186)Master(N=23)PhD(N=8)FPMSDMSDMSD1. as a compulsory subject2.39.9921.78.7361.88.9914.798.009*2. as an optional subject2.831.0772.571.0372.38.5181.248.2893. in class3.42.9512.39.7223.751.03513.399.000*4. interdisciplinary, across all subjects3.021.1153.431.0374.631.0619.086.000*5. through extracurricular activities3.44.9913.431.3433.88.354.701.4976. through an another form3.471.1733.781.1664.75.7075.154.007*

*p<0.05

The test results show statistically significant differences between teachers in 4 out of 6 claims where teachers with a bachelor degree (M=2.39, SD=.992, p<.05) believe that interculture in primary school could be implemented “as a compulsory subject”. While teachers with a doctorate (M=3.88, p<.05; M=4.63, p<.05; M=4.75, p<.05) consider that interculture in primary school could be conducted “through extracurricular activities”, “interdisciplinary, through all subjects” and “through an another form”. These results lead to the conclusion that teachers with a doctorate most accurately assessed that intercultural education could best be conducted interdisciplinary, through all subjects.

In order to check which groups of teachers the statistically significant difference shown by the ANOVA test refers to, the so-called Scheffe post-hoc test was performed.

Table 6. Post Hoc – Multiple Comparisons according to education degree

Multiple ComparisonsDependent Variable: Implementation of interculture in primary schoolSche󰀨e(I) Structure of respondentsby education degree(J) Structure of respondentsby education degreeMean Di󰀨erence(I-J)Sig.Bachelor degreeMaster.19733.340PhD-.44579.128MasterBachelor degree-.19733.340PhD-.64312*.037PhDBachelor degree.44579.128Master.64312*.037*. The mean di󰀨erence is signicant at the 0.05 level.

The Scheffe test showed a statistically significant difference between teachers with a master's degree and teachers with a doctorate (MD=-. 64312, p<.05) where the test shows a negative result or lower mean of teachers with a master's degree compared to teachers with a doctorate. The results of the ANOVA and Scheffe posthoc test show that the evaluation of the best forms for conducting intercultural education in school is related to the level of education of teachers, ie teachers with higher education degree assess more precisely what are the best forms for implementing intercultural education in school.

Differences in teachers’ attitudes according to prior intercultural education regarding the forms of implementation of the intercultural education in primary school were determined through One Way ANOVA.

Table 7. Implementation of intercultural education according to teacher’s prior intercultural education

Claim1(N=61)2(N=33)3(N=29)4(N=51)5(N=43)FPMSDMSDMSDMSDMSD1.as acompulsorysubject2.771.0552.36.8592.691.0721.71.6422.05.81512.017.000*2.as anoptionalsubject2.95.7402.611.3213.00.7562.141.0403.301.0599.522.000*3.in class3.311.1193.73.9113.00.5353.101.1003.53.7973.483.009*4.interdisciplinary,acrossallsubjects3.13.9033.241.5212.621.0492.881.1603.65.9734.619.001*5.through extracurricularactivities3.161.0193.73.9113.241.3003.431.1003.84.5313.874.005*6.through ananotherform3.481.1204.091.0113.101.3723.411.2993.72.9593.365.011*

*p<0.05

Note: 1 – basic education for work in a multicultural school; 2 – additional training for work in a multicultural classroom; 3 – you have studied interculturality on your own; 4 – combined; 5 – none of the above.

The test results show that there is a statistically significant difference between the respondents in all 6 claims. We performed the Scheffe post-hoc test to check which groups of teachers the statistically significant difference refers to.

Table 8. Post Hoc Test – Multiple Comparisons according to prior intercultural education

Multiple ComparisonsDependent Variable: Implementation of intercultural education in primary schoolSche󰀨e(I) Structure of respondents according toprior intercultural education(J) Structure of respondents accordingto prior intercultural educationMean Di󰀨erence(I-J)Sig.basic education for working in amulticultural schoolCombined.35610*.036additional training for work in multiculturalclasroomCombined.51515*.004Combinednone of the above-.57106*.000*. The mean di󰀨erence is signicant at the 0.05 level.

Multiple comparisons show that teachers with “basic education for work in a multicultural school” have a statistically significant difference with teachers with “combined” prior intercultural education where teachers with “basic education for work in a multicultural school” achieved a higher mean than teachers with “Combined” prior intercultural education (MD=.35610, p<.05) in this scale. Furthermore, teachers with “additional training for working in a multicultural classroom” achieved a higher mean than teachers with “combined” previous intercultural education (MD=.51515, p<.05). Finally, teachers with “combined” prior intercultural education achieved a lower mean than teachers with “none of the above”, ie without any prior intercultural education (MD=-.57106, p<.05). Such results lead to the conclusion that prior intercultural education influences the teachers’ attitudes on evaluation of the forms of implementation of the intercultural education in school and that the teachers who had some prior intercultural education have more information about these forms.

Conclusion

The research results show that most of the teachers agree that intercultural education in primary school could be implemented through extracurricular activities, but they think that there is an another form of implementation. The most important conclusion is that teachers do not think that intercultural education can be implemented as a compulsory subject. Teachers working in multicultural schools have more information on the forms through which intercultural education can best be implemented. This suggests that they have a higher level of intercultural competence than teachers working in mono-cultural schools. Female teachers showed a higher level of intercultural competence regarding the forms of implementation of intercultural education while senior teachers have more information about these forms. Teachers with higher education degree and teachers with prior intercultural education assess more properly what are the best forms for implementing intercultural education in school. The research results suggest that schools should become more multicultural, teachers should do a master or doctorate and teachers need training in the field of intercultural education.

NOTES

1. UNESCO, 2006. Guidelines on Intercultural Education, Education Sector, Paris: UNESCO

2. Ibid.

3. Ibid.

4. UNESCO, 2006. Guidelines on Intercultural Education, Education Sector, Paris: UNESCO.

REFERENCES

AGUADO, T. & DEL OLMO, M., 2009. Intercultural education: Perspectives and proposals. Madrid: M. del Olmo Pintado D.L.

BANKS, J. A., 1993. Multicultural education: Historical development, dimensions and practice. Review of Research in Education, (19), 3 – 49.

BANKS, J. A. & BANKS, C. A. M. B., 2002. Handbook of research on multicultural Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

BEACCO, J. C., BYRAM, M., CAVALLI, M., COSTE, D., CUENAT, M. E., GOULLIER, F. & PANTHIER, J., 2016. Guide for the development and implementation of curricula for plurilingual and intercultural education. Council of Europe.

CELIK, M. E., & ILTAR, L., 2021. Levels of Ethnocentricism among Teachers of Turkish as a Foreign Language. European Educational Researcher, 4(2), 251 – 266.

DANTOW, A., HUBBARD, L., MEHAN, H., 2002. Extending Educational Research Reform, From one School to Many, London, New York: Routledge Falmer

DE LEO, J., 2010. Reorienting Teacher Education to Address Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Tools: Education for Intercultural Understanding. UNESCO Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau for Education.

DUFOUR, B., & CURTIS, W., 2011. Studying education: An introduction to the key disciplines in education studies. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.

HELGASON, T., & LÄSSIG, S., 2010. Opening the Mind or Drawing Boundaries?: History Texts in Nordic Schools. E-BOOK, Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

HOLLINS, E. R., 2008. Culture in school learning: revealing the deep meaning. New York and London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

HUBER, J., 2012. Intercultural competence for all: preparation for living in a heterogeneous world. Council of Europe Publishing.

MARSH, C. J., 2009. Key concepts for understanding curriculum. NewYork and London: Routledge Falmer.

MILJAK, A., 2005. Sukonstrukcija kurikuluma i teorije (ranog odgoja) obrazovanja. Pedagogijska istraživanja, 2(2), 235 – 250.

PREVIŠIĆ, V., 2004. Interkulturalni stavovi hrvatskih srednjoškolaca. Pedagogijska istraživanja, 1(1), 23 – 24.

PREVIŠIĆ, V., 2010. Socijalno i kulturno biće škole: kurikulumske perspektive. Pedagogijska istraživanja, 7(2), 165 – 176.

RESMAN, M., 2006. Oblikovanje interkulturne šolske skupnosti. Sodobna pedagogika, (57), 202 – 217.

STOLL, L. & FINK, D., 1996. Changing our schools: Linking school effectiveness and school improvement. Buckingham [England]: Open University Press.

TORMEY, R., 2005. Intercultural Education in the Primary School. Guidelines for Schools. Dublin: National Council For Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA).

2025 година
Книжка 9s
Книжка 9
DEVELOPMENT OF DEMOCRATIC CULTURE THROUGH CONTENTS ABOUT THE ROMA IN CLASSROOM TEACHING – STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION

Aleksandra Trbojević, Biljana Jeremić, Hadži Živorad Milenović, Bojan Lazić

Книжка 8
КАТЕГОРИАЛНИ ИЗМЕРЕНИЯ НА ИНФОРМАЦИОННО-КОМУНИКАЦИОННИТЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ СЪС СОП

д.п.н Мира Цветкова-Арсова, Данка Щерева, Славина Лозанова, Маргарита Томова

Книжка 7
ВРЪЗКА НА СОЦИАЛНО-ЕМОЦИОНАЛНОТО С КОГНИТИВНОТО РАЗВИТИЕ В ПРИОБЩАВАЩА СРЕДА

Милен Замфиров, Маргарита Бакрачева, Емилия Евгениева

Книжка 6
КОГНИТИВНО РАЗВИТИЕ НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ, ОБХВАНАТИ В ПРИОБЩАВАЩОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Милен Замфиров, Емилия Евгениева, Маргарита Бакрачева

Книжка 5
COMPETENCE FOR SOCIAL PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICE: WHAT DO STUDENTS TELL US?

Maya Tcholakova, Marina Pironkova, Aleksandar Ranev, Yana Staneva

MULTIMODAL COMMUNICATION IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION CLASSES

Cristiana Lucretia Pop, Cristina Filip

Книжка 4s
GAMES IN FUNCTION OF DEVELOPMENT OF MULTIPLICATION SKILLS

Dasare Sylejmani, Vesna Makashevska, Jasmina Jovanovska

Книжка 4
ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА СИСТЕМИТЕ ЗА УПРАВЛЕНИЕ НА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО В КОНТЕКСТА НА ИНТЕРАКТИВНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Силвия Парушева, Борис Банков, Гергана Касабова, Петя Страшимирова

MILITARY AND SOCIAL THREATS AS DETERMINANTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONTEMPORARY UKRAINIAN HIGHER EDUCATION

Mykola Pantiuk, Tetiana Pantiuk, Nataliia Bakhmat, Olena Nevmerzhytska, Svitlana Ivakh

STEM ОБУЧЕНИЕ НА СТУДЕНТИ ПЕДАГОЗИ В ТРАНСДИСЦИПЛИНАРНА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА СРЕДА

Любен Витанов, Николай Цанев, Людмила Зафирова, Гергана Христова, Катерина Динкова, Калина Георгиева, Жорж Кюшев, Здравка Савчева

ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ И АНАЛИЗ НА НАГЛАСИТЕ НА СТУДЕНТИТЕ ПРИ ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА ГЕНЕРАТИВЕН ИНСТРУМЕНТ НА ИЗКУСТВЕН ИНТЕЛЕКТ

Николай Янев, Иглика Гетова, Теодора Христова, Ива Костадинова, Георги Димитров

Книжка 3
ДРУГИЯТ КАТО ЦЕННОСТ В УЧИЛИЩЕ

Александър Кръстев

Книжка 2
ASSESSMENTS OF TEACHERS AND PARENTS OF CHILDREN WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ON INCLUSION IN PRE-SCHOOL INSTITUTIONS

Zagorka Markov, Hadzi Zivorad Milenovic, Biljana Jeremic, Radmila Zecevic, Milica Pavlovic

Книжка 1s
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА СРЕДСТВАТА ЗА ДОПЪЛВАЩА И АЛТЕРНАТИВНА КОМУНИКАЦИЯ В ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИТЕ ИНСТИТУЦИИ В БЪЛГАРИЯ

. Неда Балканска, . Анна Трошева-Асенова, . Пенка Шапкова, Снежина Михайлова

USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING

Ekaterina Sofronieva, Christina Beleva, Galina Georgieva

Книжка 1
Скъпи читатели, автори, приятели на списание „Педагогика“,

В началото на 2025 година в първия брой на нашето списание „Педагогика“ бих искала от името на редакционната колегия и от мое име да Ви пожелая здраве, творческо вдъхновение и професионално удовлетворение от прино- са Ви към педагогическата наука и практика! Вярвам и се надявам, че списание „Педагоги- ка“ ще продължи да осигурява платформа за научен, обективен и откровен диалог, базиран на резултати от научни изследвания, за насто- ящето и бъдещето на обучението и образова- н

2024 година
Книжка 9s
Книжка 9
ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT OF VIDEO LEARNING RESOURCES IN SMALL-SCALE LEARNING SCENARIOS

César Córcoles, Laia Blasco-Soplon, Germán Cobo Rodríguez, Ana-Elena Guerrero-Roldán

Книжка 8
АНГАЖИРАНОСТ КЪМ УЧЕНЕ ЧРЕЗ ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА СМАРТ ТЕХНОЛОГИИТЕ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Кирилка Тагарева, Дора Левтерова-Гаджалова, Ваня Сивакова

Книжка 7
Книжка 6
Книжка 5s
ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВАТА НА СТАЖАНТСКАТА ПРАКТИКА ПРЕД СТУДЕНТИ – БЪДЕЩИ УЧИТЕЛИ

Илиана Петкова, Марияна Илиева, Владислава Станоева, Георги Чавдаров

Книжка 5
FEATURES OF SPEECH COMPREHENSION TRAINING OF CHILDREN WITH AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS

Maryna Branytska, Svitlana Myronova, Svitlana Mykhalska

OVERVIEW OF THE STEM EDUCATION IN ISRAEL

Aharon Goldreich, Elena Karashtranova

Книжка 4
НАГЛАСИ НА СТУДЕНТИТЕ КЪМ СМАРТ ТЕХНОЛОГИИТЕ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Дора Левтерова-Гаджалова, Кирилка Тагарева, Ваня Сивакова

PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT FOR YOUNG RESEARCHERS

Emina Vukašinović, Marija Veselinović, Milan Milikić

РОБОТИТЕ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО – ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА STEAM ИГРА

Мария Желязкова, Михаил Кожухаров, Даниела Кожухарова

Книжка 3s
Книжка 3
ATTITUDES AND EXPERIENCES OF THE PRESCHOOL TEACHERS IN THE APPLICATION OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION

Nataša Branković, Gordana Kozoderović, Biljana Jeremić, Danijela Petrović, Bojan Lazić, Slavica Karanović

ДИГИТАЛНИ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ПОДКРЕПА НА УЧЕНЕТО

Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова, Лъчезар Лазаров

PREPARATION OF FUTURE TEACHERS FOR ORGANISING A HEALTH-PRESERVING INCLUSIVE SPACE IN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

Nadiya Skotna, Tetiana Nadimyanova, Anna Fedorovych, Myroslava Sosiak, Oksana Yatsiv

Книжка 2s
Книжка 2
ОТ РИСУНКА – КЪМ СНИМКА

Камен Теофилов

Книжка 1s
Книжка 1
„ВТОРОТО“ БЪЛГАРСКО УЧИЛИЩЕ. ГЕНЕЗИСЪТ

Пенка Цонева, Бистра Мизова

2023 година
Книжка 9
EXPLORING THE NARRATIVE IDENTITY OF HUNGARIAN TEACHERS IN SLOVAKIA

Patrik Baka, Terézia Stredl, Kinga Horváth, Zsuzsanna Huszár, Melinda Nagy, Péter Tóth, András Németh

Книжка 8
A QUALITY “ONLINE” TEACHER – WHAT DO STUDENTS APPRECIATE AND VALUE IN TEACHERS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING?

Irena Golubović-Ilić, Ivana Ćirković-Miladinović, Nataša Vukićević

SUPPORT FOR THE INCLUSION OF ROMA CHILDREN THROUGH THE PROJECT TEACHING MODEL

Biljana Jeremić, Aleksandra Trbojević, Bojan Lazić, Gordana Kozoderović

TREND ANALYSIS OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCES OF SPORTS TEACHERS AND COACHES

Sergejs Capulis, Valerijs Dombrovskis, Svetlana Guseva, Alona Korniseva

Книжка 7
ЦЕННОСТЕН ПРОФИЛ НА УЧИТЕЛИТЕ В НАЦИОНАЛЕН КОНТЕКСТ

Цветан Давидков, Силвия Цветанска

Книжка 6s
MODELLING OF MARITIME CYBER SECURITY EDUCATION AND TRAINING

Gizem Kayisoglu, Pelin Bolat, Emre Duzenli

INTRODUCING THE USE OF CASE STUDIES METHODOLOGY IN TRAINING FOR SOFT SKILLS IN MARITIME UNIVERSITIES. THE ISOL-MET PROGRAM

Maria Lekakou, Helen Iakovaki, Dimitris Vintzilaios, Markella Gota, Giorgos Georgoulis, Thalia Vintzilaiou

THE ROLE OF MARITIME EDUCATION IN DIGITALIZATION

Kamelia Narleva, Yana Gancheva

Книжка 6
С МИСИЯ ЗА НАЦИОНАЛНА И КУЛТУРНА ИНДИВИДУАЛНОСТ

Надежда Кръстева, Йордан Колев

Книжка 5s
PREFACE

Nikola Vaptsarov Naval Academy is the oldest technical educational institution in Bulgaria. The Naval Academy is one of the symbols of Varna and Bulgaria in the world maritime community. Its history and achievements establish it as the most prestigious center for training of maritime specialists. At present, the Naval Academy trains specialists for the Navy and for the merchant marine in all areas of maritime life. Research and development conducted at the Naval Academy in Varna

A FAIR CONCERN ABOUT ECDIS

Nikolay Sozonov, Dilyan Dimitranov

DATA-DRIVEN LEARNING APPROACH TO MARITIME ENGLISH

Jana Kegalj, Mirjana Borucinsky, Sandra Tominac Coslovich

DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS THROUGH THE “CASE STUDY” TEACHING METHOD IN MARITIME ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING (MELT)

Tamila Mikeladze, Svetlana Rodinadze, Zurab Bezhanovi, Kristine Zarbazoia, Medea Abashidze, Kristine Iakobadze

MAXIMIZING STUDENTS’ LEARNING IN MARITIME ENGLISH ONLINE COURSE

Valentyna Kudryavtseva, Svitlana Barsuk, Olena Frolova

Книжка 5
Книжка 4s
Книжка 4
Книжка 3s
СПИРАЛАТА ОБЩЕСТВО – ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Иванка Шивачева-Пинеда

Книжка 3
ПРОЕКТНО БАЗИРАНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ ЗА СОЦИАЛНО-ЕМОЦИОНАЛНИ И ТЕХНОЛОГИЧНИ УМЕНИЯ ЧРЕЗ ПРОГРАМАТА „УМЕНИЯ ЗА ИНОВАЦИИ“

Галин Цоков, Александър Ангелов, Йоанна Минчева, Рени Димова, Мария Цакова

МЕДИЙНАТА ГРАМОТНОСТ И УЧИТЕЛИТЕ

Светла Цанкова, Стела Ангова, Мария Николова, Иван Вълчанов, Илия Вълков, Георги Минев

Книжка 2
INTONATION AND CHILDREN WITH EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL PROBLEMS

Katerina Zlatkova-Doncheva, Vladislav Marinov

Книжка 1
2022 година
Книжка 9
ТРАНСГРЕСИВНО-СИНЕРГИЧНО КАРИЕРНО РАЗВИТИЕ В „НЕФОРМАЛНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ“ В УНИВЕРСИТЕТА

д.п.н Яна Рашева-Мерджанова, Моника Богданова, Илиана Петкова

Книжка 8
INTEGRATING INTERCULTURAL EDUCATION IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOL CURRICULUM

Bujar Adili, Sonja Petrovska, Gzim Xhambazi

НАГЛАСИ НА БЪДЕЩИТЕ ДЕТСКИ УЧИТЕЛИ КЪМ STEM ПОДХОДА

Наталия Павлова, Михаела Тончева

Книжка 7
НАЦИОНАЛНАТА ИДЕЯ НА ПАИСИЙ ХИЛЕНДАРСКИ

Йордан Колев, Надежда Кръстева

Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ИВАН Д. ШИШМАНОВ – ЕВРОПЕИЗИРАНИЯТ БЪЛГАРИН

Надежда Кръстева, Йордан Колев

THE TECHNOLOGY OF DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNICATIVE CULTURE OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS

Mariia Oliiar, Nataliia Blahun, Halyna Bilavych, Nataliia Bakhmat, Tetyana Pantyuk

Книжка 4
TEACHERS’ATTITUDES BOUT TEACHING AND LEARNING MATHEMATICS

Aleksandra Mihajlović, Emina Kopas-Vukašinović, Vladimir Stanojević

EDUCATION 4.0 – THE CHANGE OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE LABOUR MARKET

Gergana Dimitrova, Blaga Madzhurova, Stefan Raychev, Dobrinka Stoyanova

Книжка 3s
DISTANCE LEARNING IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMICS

Baktybek Keldibekov, Shailoobek Karagulov

DIGITAL UNIVERSITIES: FEATURES AND KEY CHARACTERISTICS

Marina Skiba, Maktagali Bektemessov, Alma Turganbayeva

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
TWO-TIER MODEL OF TRAINING FUTURE TEACHERS FOR COACHING AT OUT-OF-SCHOOL INSTITUTIONS

Borys Savchuk, Tetyana Pantyuk, Natalia Sultanova, Halyna Bilavych, Mykola Pantyuk

Книжка 1
2021 година
Книжка 9
ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЕТО МЕЖДУ ФОРМАЛНОТО И НЕФОРМАЛНОТО ЗДРАВНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Вержиния Боянова, Константин Теодосиев, Берджухи Йорданова

FORMATION OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE OF ASSISTANT TEACHER OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN SECONDARY EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

Vladyslava Liubarets, Nataliia Bakhmat, Olena Matviienko, Oksana Tsykhmeistruk, Inna Feltsan

Книжка 8
Книжка 7s
CONCEPT OF PRESENT PRACTICE IN CHOOSING OF OPTIMAL NUMBER OF TUGS

Rino Bošnjak, Zvonimir Lušić, Filip Bojić, Dario Medić

S-101 CHARTS, DATABASE TABLES FOR S-101 CHARTS, AUTONOMOUS VESSEL

Vladimir Brozović, Danko Kezić, Rino Bošnjak, Filip Bojić

INFLUENCE OF HYDRO-METEOROLOGICAL ELEMENTS ON THE SHIP MANOEUVRING IN THE CITY PORT OF SPLIT

Zvonimir Lušić, Nenad Leder, Danijel Pušić, Rino Bošnjak

MEETING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS – EXPERIENCE FROM THE LARGEST SHIPPING COMPANIES

Katarina Balić, Helena Ukić Boljat, Gorana Jelić Mrčelić, Merica Slišković

OPTIMISING THE REFERENCE POINT WITHIN A JOURNAL BEARING USING LASER ALIGNMENT

Ty Aaron Smith, Guixin Fan, Natalia Nikolova, Kiril Tenekedjiev

REVIEW OF THE CURRENT INCREASE OF NOISE UNIT COST VALUES IN TRANSPORT

Luka Vukić, Ivan Peronja, Mihaela Bukljaš, Alen Jugović

TARGET DETECTION FOR VISUAL COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM

Miro Petković, Danko Kezić, Igor Vujović, Ivan Pavić

NEW RESULTS FOR TEACHING SHIP HANDLING USING FAST TIME SIMULATION

Knud Benedict, Michèle Schaub, Michael Baldauf, Michael Gluch, Matthias Kirchhoff, Caspar Krüger

POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF ELECTRICALY DRIVEN FERRY, CASE STUDY

Tina Perić, Ladislav Stazić, Karlo Bratić

SITUATIONAL AWARENESS – KEY SAFETY FACTOR FOR THE OFFICER OF THE WATCH

Hrvoje Jaram, Pero Vidan, Srđan Vukša, Ivan Pavić

Книжка 7
INCLUSIVE INTELLIGENCE

Aleksandar Krastev

EDUCATION OF MORAL CULTURE OF STUDENT YOUTH IN THE CONDITIONS OF POLYCULTURAL SPACE

Natalia Bondarenko, Yevhen Rozdymakha, Lyudmila Oderiy, Anatoly Rozdymakha, Dilyana Arsova

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN KOSOVO – RESEARCH OF TRAINING PROGRAMS AND TESTS

Bekim Samadraxha, Veton Alihajdari, Besim Mustafa, Ramë Likaj

Книжка 6s
EVALUATION OF CRUISER TRAFFIC VARIABLES IN SEAPORTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA

Maja Račić, Katarina Balić, Mira Pavlinović, Antonija Mišura

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CONTRACTS FOR MARITIME TRANSPORT SERVICES. CHAIN OF CHARTER PARTIES

Svetlana Dimitrakieva, Ognyan Kostadinov, Christiana Atanasova

THE LIGHTSHIP MASS CALCULATION MODEL OF A MERCHANT SHIP BY EMPIRICAL METHODS

Vedran Slapničar, Katarina Zadro, Viktor Ložar, Ivo Ćatipović

ON EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN MARITIME COMMUNICATIONS AND THE GMDSS DURING THE COVID-19

Chavdar Alexandrov, Grozdyu Grozev, Georgi Dimitrov, Avgustin Hristov

AIR POLLUTANT EMISSION MEASUREMENT

Nikola Račić, Branko Lalić, Ivan Komar, Frane Vidović, Ladislav Stazić

ASSESSMENT OF LNG BUNKERING ACCIDENTS

Peter Vidmar, Andrej Androjna

EGR OPERATION INFLUENCE ON THE MARINE ENGINE EFFICIENCY

Delyan Hristov, Ivan Ivanov, Dimitar Popov

THE MEASUREMENT OF EXHAUST GAS EMISSIONS BY TESTO 350 MARITIME – EXHAUST GAS ANALYZER

Bruna Bacalja, Maja Krčum, Tomislav Peša, Marko Zubčić

PROPELLER LOAD MODELLING IN THE CALCULATIONS OF MARINE SHAFTING TORSIONAL VIBRATIONS

Nenad Vulić, Karlo Bratić, Branko Lalić, Ladislav Stazić

TECHNICAL DIAGNOSTICS OF MARINE EQUIPMENT WITH PSEUDO-DISCRETE FEATURES

Guixin Fan, Natalia Nikolova, Ty Smith, Kiril Tenekedjiev

CONTRIBUTION TO THE REDUCTION OF THE SHIP’S SWITCHBOARD BY APPLYING SENSOR TECHNOLOGY

Nediljko Kaštelan, Marko Zubčić, Maja Krčum, Miro Petković

THE STAND FOR FIN DRIVES ENERGY TESTING

Andrzej Grządziela, Marcin Kluczyk, Tomislav Batur

INTRODUCTION OF 3D PRINTING INTO MARINE ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION – A CASE STUDY

Ivica Kuzmanić, Igor Vujović, Zlatan Kulenović, Miro Petković

SHIPYARD CRANE MODELING METHODS

Pawel Piskur, Piotr Szymak, Bartosz Larzewski

Книжка 6
TEACHERS' PERSPECTIVE ON THE EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF ONLINE TEACHING

Julien-Ferencz Kiss, Florica Orțan, Laurențiu Mândrea

Книжка 5
ФИДАНА ДАСКАЛОВА ЗА ПЕДАГОГИКАТА

Маргарита Колева, Йордан Колев

Книжка 4
Книжка 3
НЕВРОДИДАКТИКА

Наталия Витанова

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
BULGARIAN SCHOOL – SHOWCASE OF IDENTITY

Veska Gyuviyska, Nikolay Tsankov

2020 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
EDUCATIONAL REASONS FOR EARLY SCHOOL DROP-OUT

Maria Teneva, Zlatka Zhelyazkova

Книжка 7s
TEACHING CHALLENGES IN SPORTS EDUCATION DURING THE PANDEMIC COVID-19

Evelina Savcheva, Galina Domuschieva-Rogleva

THE DIFFERENCES IN STUDENTS’ATTITUDES ABOUT ONLINE TEACHING DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Aleksić Veljković Aleksandra, Slađana Stanković, Irena Golubović-Ilić, Katarina Herodek

ONLINE EDUCATION DURING PANDEMIC, ACCORDING TO STUDENTS FROM TWO BULGARIAN UNIVERSITIES

Antoaneta Getova¹, Eleonora Mileva², Boryana Angelova-Igova²

Книжка 7
Книжка 6
TEACHERS ATTITUDES ABOUT INTEGRATED APPROACH IN TEACHING

Emina Kopas-Vukašinović, Aleksandra Mihajlović, Olivera Cekić-Jovanović

Книжка 5
КОНЦЕПТУАЛНИ МОДЕЛИ ЗА РАЗРАБОТВАНЕ НА ПОЗНАВАТЕЛНИ ОНЛАЙН ИГРИ В ОБЛАСТТА НА КУЛТУРНОТО НАСЛЕДСТВО

Детелин Лучев, Десислава Панева-Мариновa, Радослав Павлов, Гита Сенка, Лилия Павлова

Книжка 4
A CONTINUUM OF APPROACHES TO SCHOOL INSPECTIONS: CASES FROM EUROPE

Rossitsa Simeonova, Yonka Parvanova, Martin Brown, Sarah Gardezi, Joe O’Hara, Gerry McNamara, Laura del Castillo Blanco, Zacharoula Kechri, Eleni Beniata

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2019 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НА БЪДЕЩЕТО

Наталия Витанова

Книжка 7
RISK FACTORS FOR EARLY SCHOOL LEAVING IN BULGARIA

Elena Lavrentsova, Petar Valkov

Книжка 6
Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
LEARNING MATURITY

Alina Gîmbuță, Daniela-Carmen Berințan, Marijana Mikulandra, Krzysztof Kij, Katja Sivka

Книжка 2
ДЕТЕТО И ПЕДАГОГИКАТА

Яна Рашева-Мерджанова

Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ КОЛЕГИ,

На добър час!

УЧЕНИЧЕСКО САМОУПРАВЛЕНИЕ

Бисерка Михалева

2018 година
Книжка 9
ПРАВАТА НА ДЕТЕТО ПРЕЗ ПОГЛЕДА НА СТУДЕНТИ ПЕДАГОЗИ

Йорданка Николова, Даниела Рачева

Книжка 8
СПОДЕЛЕНО МНЕНИЕ

Йосиф Нунев

Книжка 7
РАДОСТТА ОТ ОБЩУВАНЕТО НА ЧУЖД ЕЗИК В ДЕТСТВОТО

Екатерина Софрониева, Христина Белева

ПРОФ. Д-Р ЕЛЕНА РУСИНОВА-БАХУДЕЙЛА

Розалина Енгелс-Критидис

Книжка 6
ПОЗИТИВНА УЧЕБНА СРЕДА

Валентина Шарланова

SENIOR CITIZENS’ EXISTENTIAL NEEDS AND EDUCATION FOR THE MEANING OF LIFE

Joanna Łukasik, Norbert Pikuła, Katarzyna Jagielska

Книжка 5
ПАРАДИГМАТА СЕМИОТИКА – ЕЗИК – ДЕТЕ ПРИ 6 – 7-ГОДИШНИТЕ

Жоржетина Атанасова, Любимка Габрова

Книжка 4
ДЕТСКИ КОНФЕРЕНЦИИ

Боряна Иванова

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
СЪВРЕМЕННИ МЕТАМОРФОЗИ НА ВЗАИМООТНОШЕНИЯТА В ДЕТСКАТА ГРУПА

Веселина Иванова, Виолета Кърцелянска-Станчева

SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES AS SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS

Emilj Sulejmani, Shikjerije Sulejmani

ОТНОСНО УСЕТА ЗА БРОЕНЕ

Петър Петров, Мима Трифонова

Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ КОЛЕГИ И ПРИЯТЕЛИ

Емилия Василева, главен редактор

ДОБРИ ПРАКТИКИ „ПАРТНЬОРСТВО РОДИТЕЛИ – УЧИЛИЩЕ“

Мехмед Имамов, Калинка Гайтанинчева

2017 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
ЧЕТЯЩИЯТ СТУДЕНТ, ЧЕТЯЩОТО ДЕТЕ – ЕДНО МАЛКО ПРОЗОРЧЕ, ЕДНА ВЕЛИЧЕСТВЕНА ГЛЕДКА

Мариана Мандева, Боряна Туцева, Габриела Николова, Цветелина Ковачева

Кампания на Институт за български език – БАН и вестник „Аз-буки“

на Институт за български език – БАН, и вестник „Аз-буки“

ЕДИН ТИП СЛОЖНИ НАРЕЧИЯ

Марияна Цибранска-Костова

СВАТБА

Палмира Легурска

Книжка 7
ДИДАКТИЧЕСКИ КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТИ

Нели Митева, Наталия Витанова

Книжка 6
АБВ ПОИСКА … ИЛИ АБВ ПОИСКАХА…?

Цветелина Георгиева

Книжка 5
НОВА И ПОЛЕЗНА КНИГА

Йонка Първанова

Книжка 4
Кампания на Института за български език – БАН и вестник „Аз-буки“

на Института за български език – БАН, и вестник „Аз-буки“

ИМЕНИЦИ И ИМЕННИЦИ

Ивелина Стоянова

НЕ МОГА ДА НЕ НЕДОВОЛСТВАМ

Ивелина Стоянова

ОБРЪЩЕНИЕ ИЛИ ОБРАЩЕНИЕ?

Диана Благоева

ОЩЕ ВЕДНЪЖ ЗА ГЛАВНИТЕ БУКВИ

Мая Влахова-Ангелова

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
ПРОБЛЕМИ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВИ В РАЗВИТИЕТО НА ХУДОЖЕСТВЕНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ У НАС ПРЕЗ ПОГЛЕДА НА ДЕТСКИЯ И НАЧАЛНИЯ УЧИТЕЛ

Теодора Власева, Даниела Гирджева-Валачева, Мария Калоферова, Найден Младенов, Илияна Шотлекова

Книжка 1
ФАКТОРИ ЗА УСПЕШНО ПРИЛАГАНЕ НА СМЕСЕНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова, Лъчезар Лазаров

2016 година
Книжка 9
ВНИМАВАЙКИ В КАРТИНКАТА

Ивелина Стоянова

Книжка 8
Книжка 7
Кампания на Института за български език – БАН и в. „Аз-буки“

на Института за български език – БАН, и в. „Аз-буки“

ПРАВО В ДЕСЕТКАТА

Ивелина Стоянова

ЗДРАВЕЙТЕ, ЗАПЕТАИ!

Илияна Кунева

ЗА ЦИФРИТЕ И ЧИСЛАТА

Светлозара Лесева

Книжка 6
УЧИЛИЩЕ ЗА ЧЕТЕНЕ

Петя Георгиева, Христина Димитрова

Кампания на Института за български език – БАН и в. „Аз Буки“

на Института за български език – БАН, и в. „Аз Буки“

ДОШЛА ЛИ Е ИНСПЕКТОРЪТ?

Ванина Сумрова

ДА ВИ Е СЛАДКО!

Иво Панчев

ЩЕ ТЕ ЧАКАМ В/НА ЦЕНТЪРА

Илияна Гаравалова

КЪЩА-МУЗЕЙ ИЛИ КЪЩА МУЗЕЙ?

Ивелина Стоянова

КОЙ Е ПО-, ПÒ, НАЙ-?

Мария Тодорова

ТЪРСИ МЕ ПРОДАВАЧКА

Светлозара Лесева

ПРАВО В ДЕСЕТКАТА

Ивелина Стоянова

ПРОФ.Д.П.Н. СТОЯНКА ЖЕКОВА

Редколегия на сп. „Педагогика“

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
AN OVERVIEW ON FORMAL SCHOOLING SYSTEM IN SEVEN COUNTRIES

Alina Gîmbută, Maria Fili, Cemile Yavuz, Radmila Jeřábková, Nikolina Ratković, Paulo Manuel Oliveira Mengo de Abreu, Chiara Sega

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
IN MEMORIAM

На 10.12.2015 г. ни напусна нашият колега и приятел проф. д-р Иван Пет ков Иванов. Той беше уважаван учен и експерт в областта на педагогическите науки – автор на 10 монографии, 8 учебника, 10 учебни помагала, 6 студии и над 100 статии в специализирани периодич- ни издания и научни сборници; участник в 28 между- народни и национални проекта; председател и член на експертни групи към НАОА, член на редакционната ко- легия на сп. „Педагогика“. Проф. д-р Иван Иванов беше уважаван и оби

2015 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
Книжка 7
ДИСКУСИЯТА В УРОКА ПО ЛИТЕРАТУРА

Огняна Георгиева-Тенева

Книжка 6
ГОТОВНОСТ ЗА ОГРАМОТЯВАНЕ

Екатерина Чернева

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
Книжка 2
ПРОБЛЕМИ НА СОЦИАЛНАТА АДАПТАЦИЯ НА ПЪТУВАЩИ УЧЕНИЦИ ОТ МАЛКИ НАСЕЛЕНИ МЕСТА\(^{1)}\)

Траян Попкочев, Бонка Гергинова, Тереза Карамангалова

ТУРНИР ПО КАНАДСКА БОРБА

Д. Евтимова, Е. Павлова, И. Радославова и Б. Иванов

ДЕТСКА ЛЯТНА ОЛИМПИАДА

Нели Бъчварова, Десислава Дургова

Книжка 1
ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: THEORY AND REALITY

Inna Leonidovna Fedotenko

2014 година
Книжка 9
ДА ЗАПАЛИШ ИСКРАТА

Дафинка Самарджиева

НА УЧИЛИЩЕ – С УСМИВКА!

Снежана Якимова

УЧИТЕЛЯТ – ЕТАЛОН ЗА ФОРМИРАНЕ НА ДЕТСКАТА ЛИЧНОСТ

Катя Коруджийска, Янка Маринкова

Книжка 8
Книжка 7
ЗАЕДНО МОЖЕМ ПОВЕЧЕ

Диана Смиленова

Книжка 6-bad
ЗА ДУМАТА КАТО СРЕДСТВО ЗА ОБЩУВАНЕ

ЗА ДУМАТА КАТО СРЕДСТВО ЗА ОБЩУВАНЕ

УСПЕШНИЯТ УЧИТЕЛ – МЕЖДУ ПРОФЕСИОНАЛНАТА НОРМА И СТРАСТТА ДА ПРЕПОДАВАШ

Проф. д-р Ангел Петров е преподавател по методика на обучението по български език в СУ „Св. Климент Охридски“. Ръководител е на най- старата катедра по методика на филологически- те дисциплини в страната – Катедрата по ме-

Книжка 6
Книжка 5
LE PROJET PÉDAGOGIQUE, SOURCE DE MOTIVATION DANS L’ENSEIGNEMENT ET L’APPRENTISSAGE DU FLE

THE EDUCATIONAL PROJECT, MEANS OF MOTIVATION IN TEACHING AND LEARNING FLE

LA PÉDAGOGIE DU PROJET ET LA MOTIVATION DES ÉLÈVES POUR L’APPRENTISSAGE DU FRANÇAIS

PROJECT PEDAGOGY AND PUPILS’ MOTIVATION IN LEARNING FRENCH

Книжка 4
КАЖДЫЙ ДЛЯ МЕНЯ УЧИТЕЛЬ

Ш.А.Амонашвили

Книжка 3
АНТОАНЕТА ЙОВЧЕВА (1952 – 2014)

След трудна борба с тежката болест ни напусна един добър и мил човек, една светла личност – Анто- анета Йовчева, нашата обичана колежка Тони. Нейните колеги и приятели, многобройните автори и сътрудници на сп. „Начално образование“ и на сп. „Педагогика“ ще запазят завинаги спомена за нейната приветлива усмивка, за нейната отзивчивост и преда- ност към работата, за нейната широка култура и стре- меж към познание, към развитие. Родена на 20 март 1952 г. в София в интелигентно се- мей

Книжка 2
ПОСТМОДЕРНИЗЪМ И ВЪЗПИТАНИЕ

Клавдия Сапунджиева

ДЕТСКИ УНИВЕРСИТЕТИ

Боряна Иванова

ПРОФ. Д-Р ЕЛКА ПЕТРОВА

Златка Петрова

МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЙ ЦЕНТР ГУМАННОЙ ПЕДАГОГИКИ

Международният център „Хуманна педагогика“ организира XIII педаго- гически четения в периода 20 – 23.03.2014 г. в гр.Тбилиси, Грузия. Форумът се организира със съдействието на грузинското правителство. „Учителят“ е темата, която ще обедини участниците: учители, експерти, родители, универ- ситетски преподаватели, представители на педагогическата общност от мно- го страни, за да се осъществи дискусия за мисията на съвременния учител в съвременния образователен контекст. Ръководството на

Книжка 1
ОСНОВНИ ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКИ НА МОБИЛНОТО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова, Лъчезар Лазаров

2013 година
Книжка 9
УЧИТЕЛИ ВЪЗРОЖДЕНЦИ В ТЪРНОВО

Венка Кутева-Цветкова

Книжка 8
ДИМИТЪР ДОНЧЕВ – С ВЪЗХИТА ЗА БЪЛГАРСКИЯ УЧИТЕЛ

100 ГОДИНИ ОТ РОЖДЕНИЕТО НА ДИМИТЪР ЕВСТАТИЕВ ДОНЧЕВ (5.10.1913 – 15.02.1997)

Книжка 7
„СЛЪНЦЕТО“ НА ВЪЗПИТАТЕЛНАТА СИСТЕМА В ТВУ – РАКИТОВО

85 ГОДИНИ ОТ РОЖДЕНИЕТО НА АНГЕЛ УЗУНОВ (1928 – 1999)

ЦЕННОСТИ И ДУХОВНО-НРАВСТВЕНО РАЗВИТИЕ НА МАЛКИЯ УЧЕНИК

Марияна Ешкенази, Гергана Фиданова, Марияна Вишева, Цветанка Годжилова

МАЛКИЯТ УЧЕНИК ЧЕТЕ

Марияна Механджиева Венета Велева

С БАБА И ДЯДО В КЛАС

Цветелин Горанов, Таня Илиева, Цветанка Берова, Нели Иванова, Борка Бончева

РОД РОДА НЕ ХРАНИ, НО ТЕЖКО МУ, КОЙТО ГО НЯМА!

Диляна Вачкова Евелина Димитрова

ДА ПОМОГНЕМ НА ДЕЦАТА ДА ОТВОРЯТ СЪРЦАТА СИ

Иванка Дебелушина, Нина Маврикова

ДОБРОТО Е У ВСЕКИ

Мария Наскова

ОТЛИЧЕН ПЕДАГОГ, ПСИХОЛОГ И ПСИХОТЕРАПЕВТ

ДОЦ. СВЕТОСЛАВ СТАМЕНОВ (1939 – 2013)

Книжка 6
ТЕОРЕТИКО-ПРИЛОЖНИ ПРОБЛЕМИ НА КОНСТРУИРАНЕТО НА ТЕСТ ЗА НАЦИОНАЛНО ВЪНШНО ОЦЕНЯВАНЕ ПО „ЧОВЕКЪТ И ОБЩЕСТВОТО“ ЗА 4. КЛАС (2013)

Ваня Петрова, Цонка Каснакова, Мариан Делчев Жана Минчева Радостина Стоянова, Рада Димитрова Мария Темникова

MEDIA IN PRESCHOOL AGE OF CHILD’S LIFE

Sonja Petrovska Jadranka Bocvarova

Книжка 5
ШАЛВА АЛЕКСАНДРОВИЧ АМОНАШВИЛИ – УЧИТЕЛ ОТ БЪДЕЩЕТО

В сложното битие на науката и метамор- фозите на социалната реалност, неотменими и общовалидни остават само най-стойностни- те постижения и безспорни истини, които не само маркират и остойностяват територията на човешко познание, но извисяват самия чо- век, поддържат неговата вяра в доброто, под- хранват чувството му за собствена значимост, укрепват неговия дух. Приемайки извечните послания на класи- ческата философско-педагогическа мъдрост и дълбоко обвързан с педагогическата р

МАНИФЕСТ ГУМАННОЙ ПЕДАГОГИКИ

Преамбула 25 лет тому назад группа учителей новаторов провозгласила манифест „Пе- дагогика сотрудничества“ (Переделкино, 1986 год). В последующие годы были опубликованы отчеты встреч учителей новаторов, в которых рассматри- вались разные аспекты педагогики сотрудничества: „Демократизация лично- сти“ (Цинандали, Телавский район, Грузия, 1987 год), „Методика обновления“ (Москва, 1988 год), „Войдем в новую школу“ (Краснодарский край, 1988 год). Идеи педагогики сотрудничества воодушевленно

ПОРТФОЛИОТО НА УЧЕНИКА КАТО ПРОЦЕС НА САМОПОЗНАНИЕ

Радка Топалска Емилия Вълкова, Албена Атанасова

ДОПИРНИ СВЕТОВЕ

Албена Димитрова, Стилияна Гронева

ПРЕДИ ГОДИНА И СЕГА

Веселка Аршинкова

Книжка 4
СВЕЩЕНИК ГЕОРГИ МАРИНОВ ПОЛУГАНОВ – ОСНОВАТЕЛЯТ НА УЧИЛИЩЕТО И ПЪРВИЯТ УЧИТЕЛ В ПОЛИКРАЙЩЕ

Георги Георгиев Трифонка Попниколова Марияна Георгиева–Гроссе

ЕВРОПЕЙСКИ ПРИКАЗКИ

Светла Попова

Книжка 3
ДА ОПАЗИМ ДЕТСКОТО ЗДРАВЕ!

Мая Топалова, Симона Пейчева

КАК ДА ОТГЛЕДАМЕ МАЛЪК ПРИРОДОЛЮБИТЕЛ?

Мадлена Николова Ани Цветкова

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
ИЗКУСТВОТО ЗА ПРЕВЕНЦИЯ НА АГРЕСИВНОТО ПОВЕДЕНИЕ НА ДЕЦАТА

Евгения Миланова Виолета Николова Величка Радева

ПРИЯТЕЛСТВОТО В ЖИВОТА НА ДЕТЕТО

Даниела Димитрова, Красимира Василева

ПРЕДАЙ НАТАТЪК

Вилдан Мехмедова

2012 година
Книжка 9
ПЕДАГОГЪТ – РИЦАР НА ДЕТСТВОТО

Януш Корчак бе написал, че животът на великите хора е като легендите: труден, но красив. И се оказва пророчески прав, сякаш е писал за себе си! Наследник на семейство с богата духовна култура и традиции, останал отрано без баща, той не просто се справя с несгодите на сирачеството, но развива у себе си три могъщи извора на живот: любов към свободата и справедливостта, страст към знанието и творчеството, отдаденост на децата и тяхното щастие. Лекарят Корчак лекува децата и душите им. Безплатн

ЯНУШ КОРЧАК – ВЕЛИК ХУМАНИСТ И ПЕДАГОГ

„Със сила и мощ поведох своя живот, който беше привидно неподреден, самотен и чужд. За син избрах идеята да служа на детето и неговото дело. Привидно загубих.“ Бе лекар, писател, мислител. Бе философ, учен, моралист. Издател. Възпи- тател и педагог. Бе герой. Бе скромен. Във всяка от тези области той има изключителни постижения. В течение на по- вече от четиридесет години работи като педагог и писател. Четиридесет години безкористно служене на слабите и беззащитните. Създава съвременна кон

ЕВОЛЮЦИЯ НА ПРАВАТА НА ДЕТЕТО

„Детето има право на сериозно отношение към проблемите му, на справедливото им решаване.“

THE KORCZAK’S RIGHT TO SOCIAL PARTICIPATION OF CHILDREN THE CITIZENSHIP OF CHILDREN

A speech by Marek Michalak, the Ombudsman for Children, given during the seminar„The Polish-Israeli pioneer in the fi eld of human rights, Janusz Korczak (1879–1942) and today’s Convention on Children’s Rights as the part of the international law“, Geneva, the 6 of June 2009

ЗА ДЕТЕТО, ДЕТСТВОТО ИЛИ НАУКА ЗА НЕГО?

В памет на Януш Корчак – по повод 70 г. от неговата смърт и 100 г. от създаването на „Дом за сираци“ във Варшава Албена Чавдарова

Книжка 8
CHANGES IN UNIVERSITY TEACHING – THE ROAD FROM KNOWLEDGE TO COMPETENCIES

Slađana Anđelković Zorica Stanisavljević Petrović

ДОСТОЕН ЖИВОТ, ОТДАДЕН НА ПРОСВЕЩЕНИЕТО… ПРОФ. СТОЙКА ЗДРАВКОВА – ЕДИН СЪВРЕМЕНЕН БУДИТЕЛ НА 70 ГОДИНИ

Неуморна и взискателна! Енергична и всеотдай- на! Работохолик и перфекционист! Това е проф. д-р Стойка Здравкова! Не е за вярване, че в началото на ноември 2012 година навърши 70 години. И не е слу- чайно това, че тази светла дата е непосредствено бли- зо до Деня на будителите. А това, че проф . Здравкова е съвременен български будител, е толкова безспорно и видимо! 70–годишнината ù е един чудесен повод ретрос- пективно да си припомним и проследим най-значи-

Книжка 7
ОЧАКВАНА И ПОЛЕЗНА

Емилия Василева

Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ЦЕННО ПОМАГАЛО ЗА ПСИХОЛОЗИ И ПЕДАГОЗИ (Надежден инструмент за диагностициране смисъла на живота)

Любен Десев Минчев, Борис. Тест на Дж. Крумбъг и Л. Махолик за смисъл в живота. Българска версия. Варна, ВСУ „Черноризец Храбър“,

ГЕОРГИ MАВРОВ ЖИВОТ, ОТДАДЕН НА НАУКАТА И ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Така най-общо, но и най-точно можем да охарак- теризираме дейността на ст. н. с. д-р Георги Петков Мавров. Той ни напусна неочаквано в края на април т.г. И до последния си ден не преставаше да се вълнува от проблемите на образованието. Споделяше инте- ресни мисли относно предстоящото приемане на За- кона за образованието. Пестелив на думи, но щедър на дела – това ясно проличава от неговата богата би- ография.

Книжка 4
ОЩЕ ЕДНА ИДЕЯ

Галина Стоянова

Книжка 3
С ИНОВАТИВЕН ПОГЛЕД КЪМ ЛИЧНОСТТА НА ДЕТЕТО

Маргарита Абрашева Любимка Габрова

БИЗНЕС ОБУЧЕНИЕ В ДЕТСКАТА ГРАДИНА

Красимира Костова Петя Драгоданова

ДЕТСКАТА БЕЗОПАСНОСТ

Любимка Габрова

БАБА ПРИКАЗКИ РАЗКАЗВА... (МИКС ОТ ПРИКАЗКИ)

Кева Захариева, Мария Мичева

Книжка 2
ДЕТЕ ПЪТУВА В АВТОМОБИЛА

Красимира Михайлова

ПРОТИВОПОСТАВЯНЕ

Пюрвя Ердниев, Б. Ердниев

ЗДРАВКА НОВАКОВА – ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛ И ТВОРЕЦ

Седемдесетгодишният юбилей е вълнуващ повод да проследим трудния, богат и съдържателен професионално-творчески път на доц. д-р Здравка Новакова, да под- чертаем нейната важна роля за утвърждаване на дидактика на математиката като

IN MEMORIAM Иван Марев

Напусна ни проф. Иван Марев – философ, педагог, демократ, родолюбец. В далечната 1975 г., зареден с енергия, пълен с идеи, той създаде в Техническия

Книжка 1
ДЕЛЕГИРАНЕ НА ПРАВА ЧРЕЗ КОМИСИИТЕ В ДЕТСКАТА ГРАДИНА

Маргарита Абрашева Политиката, наречена управление на качеството, не е самоцел, нито поредна обра- зователна „мода“. Тя е практически необходима за поддържане от директора на учеб- ното заведение на един привлекателен образ в условията на конкуренция на пазара на учебни заведения. Това се отнася най-вече за детските градини. Политиката на упра- вление на качеството съдържа недостатъчно използван ресурс, включително за спечел- ване и запазване доверието на потребителя – родителите на децата,

ИНОВАЦИОННИ И ИНТЕРАКТИВНИ МЕТОДИ В КВАЛИФИКАЦИОННАТА ДЕЙНОСТ НА ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИЯ КОЛЕКТИВ

Стоилка Ташева, Севда Лукайчева Развиващото се с динамични темпове общество в днешно време налага необ- ходимостта от иновационни промени в областта на образованието. И в предучи- лищната педагогика все по-често се търсят алтернативни педагогически техноло- гии както за възпитанието и обучението на децата, така и при провеждането на квалификационната дейност на самите педагози. Използването на интерактивните методи дава възможност да се възлагат за- дачи, които предполагат съвместна работа,

НА УЛИЦАТА Е ОПАСНО

Таня Янчева, Зоя Кацарова