Педагогика

2023/4, стр. 500 - 519

COMPARISON OF 3

Резюме:

Ключови думи:

1. Introduction

The investigation of countries’ education systems, education policies and practices through comparison is called the comparative education study (Güzel 2010). The aim of such studies is to compare the education systems, curricula, course materials and teacher training policies of two or more countries according to some criteria and some themes and to reveal the differences and similarities between them. Comparative approaches refer to a discipline built on the comparison of the education systems of countries with each other (Yıldız, Yılmaz & Albanna 2020) to provide guidance and make suggestions by comparing different and similar aspects of the education systems (Erdoğan 2003; Mavi, Yaykıran & ElŒevik 2020; Türkoğlu 1985).

Curricula determine the educational-instructional visions of countries. Comparative education studies are of great importance in terms of the development and enrichment of educational sciences and with the perspectives and information they provide, educational sciences can be placed within a more effective framework (Erdogan 2003). Comparative education can be seen as a means of gaining information about new approaches and practices (King 1979), so comparing different education systems and practices with the education system of our country is important in terms of gaining insights about how to improve our education system (Türkoğlu 1985; Güzel 2010). Curricula are the main guidelines of educational-instructional activities. All educationalinstructional activities are carried out by adhering to a prepared curriculum. For this reason, it seems to be good to compare different curricula to open new ways for the development and change of an education system. Arrangements made in education systems become meaningful and serve the purpose when reflected in the curriculum (…nal & …nal 2010).

Mathematics education in primary school or basic education is very important. The knowledge and skills gained at this level form the basis for both the school success in the following years and lifelong learning. Two important parts of an effective mathematics teaching are the curriculum and the teacher. The characteristics and knowledge of the teacher, who prepares the students for learning in the classroom environment, plans and conducts the educational process in communication with them, prepares the whole environment, and guides the students, make an important contribution to student success. Since primary school teachers are responsible for the teaching of all branches, they need to have more knowledge and skills. Younger students encounter school mathematics for the first time when they start primary school. This period has a significant impact on children’s attitudes towards mathematics and their understanding of the nature of mathematics („zmantar, „ztürk & Bay 2015). Especially primary school teachers have an important responsibility in the formation of first impressions about mathematics. The most important process of the educational and instructional process is the primary education process. The primary education process is a process in which the student starts a more organized and formal school life, different from the kindergarten, and experiences a more critical period in terms of development (Gürkan & GökŒe 1999). Compulsory education in Turkey has been increased to 12 years as of the 2012/2013 school year, consisted of 4 years of primary school (1 st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th grades), 4 years of middle school (5 th, 6th, 7th and 8 th grades) and 4 years of high school (9th, 10th, 11th and 12 th grades). Primary education is for children between the ages of 66 months and 10 years and is carried out under the responsibility of the Ministry of National Education General Directorate of Basic Education. According to the basic law of national education “It is to equip every Turkish child with the basic knowledge, skills, behaviours and habits necessary to be a good citizen, to train him/her in accordance with the understanding of national morality and to prepare every Turkish child for life and higher education by training him/her in compliance with his/her interests, talents and abilities” 2.

Studies to evaluate international student achievement are carried out in order to create a basic database through which countries can compare the functioning of their own education systems with other countries (Toptaş, Elkatmış & Karaca 2012). Canada is a country which is at the top of the world lists in terms of development in every field. Compared to Turkey in international exams, it is also in a very good position in mathematics achievement. According to 2018 PISA Exam in the field of Mathematics, Turkey’s rank and score were 42 and 454 while Canada’s rank and score were 12 and 512 1). The federal capital of Canada is the city of Ottawa and this city is located in the province of Ontario. Primary education in Canada covers the age range of 6 to 12 years. Primary education consists of 6 grade levels ranging from grade 1 to grade 6. The common education system in Canada is the 6+3+3 education system. Although the education systems differ across the provinces, primary school is compulsory in all the provinces. Instead of a centralized education system, Canada has a local education system where the provinces determine their own educational needs. In Canada, there is no single national curriculum which was centrally developed as in Turkey. Provincial governments are responsible for education and training programs. The most distinctive feature of the education system in the country is its not being centralized. Although the policies followed by the provinces are mostly the same, there are some differences (Bakioğlu & Pekince 2020). Compulsory education is usually between the ages of 6 and 12, although the school starting age may vary from province to province.

1.1. Purpose and Significance of the Study

Comparative education research refers to a set of studies that enable readers and researchers working in the field to identify and influence the factors affecting education in their countries (Mavi, Yaykıran & ElŒevik 2020). The main purpose of these studies is to reveal the similarities and differences between the education systems and curricula of two or more countries in line with the determined goals. Canada is a highly developed country and is one of the countries with the highest scores in mathematics achievement tests according to OECD and PISA reports. In this connection, the current study was planned with the intention of comparing Turkey, a developing country, and Canada, a developed country, in terms of both their mathematics curricula and practices in mathematics classes. Comparative education studies are mostly based on the comparison of the education systems of the countries with each other (Yıldız, Yılmaz & Albanna 2020). This kind of studies create a documented knowledge domain of similarities, differences, comparisons, and mutual learning (Connely & Xu 2019).

In the current study, the similarities and differences were tried to be revealed by comparing both the curricula and the classroom teaching practices through in-class observations. The study was structured within the context of the primary school 3rd grade mathematics course. The purpose of the current study is to comparatively examine the primary school 3rd grade mathematics classes in Turkey and Canada (Ontario Province) in terms the curriculum, the role of the teacher, teacher-student interaction, classroom culture, teaching principles and strategies, classroom management, measurement and evaluation approaches, planning-timing, physical structure of the classroom and classroom teaching activities. Moreover, it is aimed to determine the similarities and differences in the classroom teaching activities carried out by teachers in order to impart problem solving and reasoning skills addressed in the primary school mathematics curricula in Canada and Turkey to students. To this end, answers to the following research questions were sought.

1. What are the general similarities and differences emerging when the primary school mathematics curricula of Canada (Ontario Province) and Turkey (Ankara Province) are compared in terms of general objectives, content, teaching principles, skills, instructional technologies and materials, instructional strategies, methods and techniques?

2. What are the similarities and differences emerging when the primary school third grade mathematics classes of Canada (Ontario Province) and Turkey (Ankara Province) are compared in terms of physical structure of the classroom, instructional activities, classroom culture, teacher role and measurement and evaluation approaches?

In addition to the scientific value of the findings to be obtained at the end of the study, another contribution of the current study to the literature can be the demonstration of the fact that comparison of the education systems of two or more countries can yield positive outcomes through the evaluation of the applicability of different practices.

2. Method

2.1. Research Design

The current study was structured as a comparative case study. A comparative case study refers to the conduct of two or more case studies and comparison of them. In the current study, Turkey Ankara Province and Canada Ontario Province 3rd grade mathematics class comparison areas were determined as follows in order to seek answers to the research problems.

– For the Ontario Province of Canada, the 2005 mathematics curriculum was used while for Turkey, the 2018 mathematics curriculum was used.

– Instructional activities, teacher role, teacher-student interaction, classroom culture, teaching principles and strategies, classroom management, measurement and evaluation approaches, planning-timing and the physical structure of the classroom.

The Case of Canada (Ontario Province)

For the Canadian part of the study, the mathematics classes of the 3rd graders of a private primary school in Toronto, Ontario Province, were observed by the researcher in the classroom for 20 class hours for 3 months. There is one private school in Toronto, Canada. In each grade level, there is one class and one teacher. In each class, there are about 20 students. The weekly lesson schedule includes 7-8 class hours for mathematics. At the end of the lesson, the researcher talked to the teacher about the lesson and the reasons for the teacher’s questions and behaviours in the lesson were wanted to be understood in detail.

The Case of Turkey (Ankara Province)

For the Turkish part of the study, mathematics lessons delivered in a third grade class in a state school in the city of Ankara were observed by the researcher for a total of 25 class hours during two terms. In order to make a comparison, not only the teacher was focused on, but also concepts such as his role in the teacher-student interactions and the mathematics classroom culture he created were also focused on. In the case of Turkey, only the interviews conducted with the teacher were audio-recorded, the lessons were not videotaped in order not to disturb the students in the classroom environment, and the notes taken by the researcher during the lesson were used as one of the data collection tools.

2.2. Data Collection Tools

The data were obtained from in-class observations, interviews with the teachers, curricula and teaching materials used by the teachers and students throughout the process.

2.2.1. In-class Observations

In both parts of the study, the researcher was present as an observer in the classroom environment during the lessons and took observation notes. During the lesson, the researcher took notes about all kinds of behaviours and discourses of the teachers, and at the end of the lessons, she made short interviews with both teachers on the points that were not clearly understood. The researcher wanted to record the whole process with video or audio recording, but she was able to take only observation notes because the legal regulations in Canada did not allow this. The teacher at the school in Ankara did not want to be recorded in the digital environment.

2.2.2. Semi-structured interviews conducted with the teachers

At the end of the observations made by the researcher, a semi-structured interview lasting 30 minutes was conducted to determine the teacher’s teaching philosophy, demographic information and teaching background. The questions asked in the interview were aimed at getting to know the teacher better, getting information about his/her philosophy of teaching, and understanding in detail all kinds of teaching activities carried out by the teacher regarding mathematics teaching in the classroom.

The same questions were asked to both of the teachers. Some of the questions used in the interview are given as “What is your philosophy of teaching? Can you explain?, What is your philosophy of teaching mathematics?, What are the teaching strategies, methods and/or techniques you use when teaching mathematics?, What are the materials you use when teaching mathematics? ”.

2.2.3. Documents

The data collection tools used in the current study as documents include the textbooks that teachers use in the classroom environment, the written materials they bring to the classroom environment, questions or worksheets, and the primary school mathematics curriculum. The curricula used in the study are The Ontario Mathematics Curriculum for Grades 1-8 and the Ministry of National Education Primary School Mathematics Curriculum MoNE 2018. The Ontario school curriculum was updated after 2020. However, since the former curriculum was used during the study period, comparisons were made over the old Ontario curriculum. The old program was being used at the time of the study.

2.3. Data Analysis

In order to find answers to the research questions of the study, a content analysis on the curriculum was conducted.

2.4. Validity and Reliability

During the class observations in Canada, the researcher sometimes adopted the role of participant observer and sometimes the role of non-participant observer. In some lessons, she was present only by observing and writing detailed reports, and sometimes she was involved in the process as an assistant teacher, checking the students’ work and giving feedback. This role sharing did not go in planned manner during the process. The researcher reported the lesson process in detail after the class in which she was in the role of a participant observer. However, in Turkey, the researcher was in the role of non-participant observer during the process. In both cases, the researcher made short interviews to illuminate the process and wrote detailed reflective reports. Apart from the reports, it was tried to establish the reliability by including another researcher who was an expert in the field. There are no specific definitions, tests or methods in qualitative research to ensure validity and reliability, as in quantitative research. Instead, there are precautions to be taken and strategies to be used for validity and reliability (Yıldırım & Şimşek 2008). In the current study, it was tried to ensure consistency in the processes of data collection, analysis and interpretation. For external reliability, the obtained results and their interpretations are presented in a way that allows them to be compared with the raw data.

4. Findings and Interpretations

4.1. Findings related to the first research problem “What are the general similarities and dierences emerging when the primary school mathematics curricula of Canada and Turkey are compared?”

For this research problem, the primary school mathematics curricula of both countries were examined in detail and the similarities and differences were tried to be revealed by comparing them under the headings of basic issues, skills, learning areas, sub-learning areas (subjects), measurement and evaluation approaches. Skills, basic issues, measurement and evaluation approaches were derived from the general approaches of the primary school curricula. Major learning areas, concepts and skills were written by making use of the subjects, expectations and objectives addressed in the 3rd grade mathematics curriculum. The obtained findings are presented in the table below.

Table 1. General Comparison of the 3rd Grade Mathematics Curricula in Turkey and Canada Ontario Province

The AreaofComparisonTurkeyCanadaBasic IssuesBasic values: justice, friendship,honesty, self-control, patience,respect, love, responsibility,patriotism, benevolenceCommunication in the mothertongueCommunication in a foreignlanguageMathematical competencesand science/technology basiccompetencesDigital competenceLearning to learnSocial competences andcitizenship-related competencesTaking initiative andentrepreneurshipCultural awarenessEnglish as a Second Languageand English LiteracyDevelopmentImportance of instructionalapproachesPlanning mathematics programsfor students with specialeducation needsAnti-discrimination education inmathematicsLiteracy and inquiry/researchskillsCounselling and mathematicsHealth and safety in mathemat-ics
SkillsMathematical literacyProblem solvingReasoningMeta-cognitive skillsEstimation skillMental calculation skillSkill to use representationA󰀨ective skillsValuing mathematicsCommunication skillAssociationskillProblem solvingReasoning and provingReectingSelecting from among devicesand computational strategies(calculators, computers,communication technologies,manipulatives, calculationstrategies)AssociationRepresentationCommunicationMajor LearningAreas and ConceptsNumbers and Operations36 objectives (natural numbers,addition, subtraction, multiplicationand division with natural numbers,fractions)Geometry10 objectives (geometric objectsand shapes, spatial relations,geometric patterns, basic conceptsin geometry)Measuring23 objectives (measuring length,measuring circumference,measuring area, measuring liquid,our coins, measuring time andweighing)Data Processing3 objectives (data collection andevaluation)Number Sense and Numeration18 special expectations (quantityrelationships, counting andoperational sense)Geometry and Spatial Sense13 special expectations (geometricproperties, geometric relationships,location and movement)Measurement16 special expectations (attributes,units and measurement sense,measurement relationships)Data management andProbability8 specic expectations (collectionand organization of data, datarelationships, probability )Patterningand Algebra10 Specic expectations (patternsand relationships, expressions andequality)Measurementand EvaluationApproachesIt is exibleNon-standardized categoriesfor both cognitive and a󰀨ectivedomainsMultifocal measurement andevaluation is essentialIt isnotin aexiblestructurewith a determined four-stageachievement chartCognitive categories determined inthe achievement chart: Knowledgeand understanding, Thinking,Communicationand ApplicationMultifocal measurement and evalu-ation is essential

The Turkish curriculum aims to train individuals who have integrated knowledge, skills and behaviours in the eight key competences it has determined. These eight competences are; communication in the mother tongue, communication in a foreign language, mathematical competences and basic science/technology competences, digital competence, learning to learn, social competences and citizenship-related competences, taking initiative and entrepreneurship, cultural awareness. In the Canadian curriculum, under the heading of basic issues, there are seven areas addressed including English as a second language and English literacy development, instructional approaches, planning mathematics programs for students with special needs, anti-discrimination education in mathematics, literacy and inquiry/research skills, counselling and mathematics and health and safety in mathematics.

When the Canadian curriculum is evaluated as a whole, it is seen that it is a curriculum written to emphasize that mathematics requires a knowledge and technology-based society, individuals who have a critical perspective on complex issues, have the ability to analyze and adapt new situations and show the ability to solve various problems and express their thoughts effectively, and that mathematics in such a society will equip students with the knowledge, skills and mental habits necessary for successful and rewarding participation. In the curriculum, the roles and responsibilities of students, parents, teachers and school administrators in mathematics education are clearly stated.

When the skills in both curricula are examined, it is seen that in both curricula it is emphasized that the skills specific to mathematics should be addressed. However, it is seen that the skills are not clearly written in the Turkish mathematics curriculum. In the last two curricula before 2018, it was seen that skills were included and determined under this heading, while no such heading is included in the last curriculum. By evaluating the whole curriculum, the emphasized skills were tried to be determined. When the whole curriculum was examined in detail from this point of view, it was determined that mathematical literacy, problem solving, reasoning, metacognitive skills, estimation skill, mental processing skill, representation skill, affective skills, valuing mathematics, communication skills, and association skill are emphasized. Compared to the Canadian curriculum, it was determined that the skills mentioned are generally similar. These skills are clearly defined and explained in detail in the Canadian curriculum. The most important difference identified here is that the Canadian curriculum includes the skill to choose devices and computational strategies (calculators, computers, communication technologies, manipulatives, calculation strategies) while in the Turkish curriculum, affective skills are specified as valuing mathematics only under the term of general skills.

In the Canadian curriculum, the skills are explained in detail, the sub-skills that students will acquire under these skills are again explained in detail, and the special sub-skills expected from students for these skills for each grade level are determined.

The major learning areas are generally included under similar headings in both curriculum. The Canadian curriculum also includes the learning areas of patterns and algebra. The algebra learning area is included in our curriculum starting from the 5th grade. While major learning areas are included in the Turkish curriculum with the names of learning domains and sub-learning domains, they are referred to as strands in the Canadian curriculum. For each strand, overall expectations and specific expectations are defined. Specific expectations are presented under separate cognitive behaviours such as quantity relationship, counting. A total of 65 special expectations are determined for 5 strands. A total of 72 objectives are determined for 4 learning areas in the Turkish primary school curriculum.

For the measurement and evaluation learning area, in the Canadian curriculum, it is stated that the basic goal of measurement and evaluation is to improve student learning, and that the information obtained through evaluation will help teachers determine the strengths and weaknesses of students in terms of the accomplishment of the objectives in the curriculum. In the curriculum, evaluation is defined as the process of collecting information that accurately reflects how well a student is meeting the expectations of the curriculum through a variety of sources (homework, daily observations and talks/lectures, demonstrations, projects, performances and tests). In order to ensure that measurement and evaluation are valid and reliable and lead to the improvement in student learning, 11 strategies are identified and these are clearly defined in the curriculum. These include basic ideas such as being fair to students, checking what students are learning and how well they are learning, and the measurement and evaluation approaches used being appropriate for learning activities, teaching purposes and students’ needs and experiences. It is stated that while evaluating the success of the student, all curriculum expectations will be taken into account, but the evaluation will focus on students’ compliance with the general expectations, and students’ meeting the general expectations and the relevant specific expectations (including the mathematical process expectations).

Given that all schools in Canada have almost the same standards, it is likely that they will set the same criteria and descriptors for all students in the same province and city. Another different understanding determined is that in the Turkish curriculum, education will be given not only for “knowing (thought)” but also for “feeling (emotion)” and “doing (action)”, so only cognitive measurements cannot be considered sufficient. The evaluation criteria in the Canadian curriculum are given only for the cognitive domain.

4.2. Findings related to the second research problem “What are the similarities and dierences emerging when the primary school third grade mathematics classes of Canada and Turkey are compared in terms of physical structure of the classroom, instructional activities, classroom culture, teacher role and measurement and evaluation approaches?”

The similarities and differences emerging when the primary school third grade mathematics classes of Canada and Turkey are compared in terms of physical structure of the classroom, instructional activities, classroom culture, teacher role and measurement and evaluation approaches are given in the table below.

Table 2. Comparison of the third grade classes in Canada and Turkey in terms of physical structure of the classroom, instructional activities, classroom culture, teacher role and measurement and evaluation approaches

Area ofComparisonCase of Turkey(Ankara Province)Case of Canada(Ontario Province)PhysicalstructureTraditionally positioned teachersdesk, blackboard and studentdesks facing the blackboardThere are student lockersThere are no materials and theircupboardsSmart boardStudents have personal lockersAliving classroom environment thatprovides the integration of all coursesThere are themed corners wherestudents are seated depending onthe subject to be addressed (a chatand reading corner with carpets andcushions, a writing and study cornerwith tables and chairs, a library corneretc.).Asection allocated to group works, asection with carpets and a library wherestudents can study by sitting and readbooks, a section with computersStudents have personal lockersThere are any kinds of materials(unit cube, geometry board, countingstamps, pattern blocks and stationery)Small le presentation boards areavailable in the classroom for studentsto use and in almost every lesson,students present their solutions to theclass by using these boards instead ofnotebooks.Separate desktop computers availablefor the use of the teacher and studentsSmart board and projectorAclassroom libraryMostly teacher-centred approachQuestion-answer, constructivistfrom time to timeQuick homework checkingStrong adherence to the textbookUse of smart boardIn-class evaluation toolsTraditional approachShowing di󰀨erent solutionsApplication of problem solvingapplicationsResearch and inquiry-based approachConstructivist teaching approachBrainstormingInquiry-based questioningProblem solving based teachingGroup workDetailed homework checkingMultiple mathematical tasksHandling higher-order problemsUse of di󰀨erent technological toolsUse of rich course materials
Instructional ActivitiesActive learningConscious handling of mathematicallanguage and multiple representationsConscious handling of the metacogni-tive processUse and encouragement of reasoningskills such as estimation and generali-zationEncouraging students to develop theirown methodsClassroom CultureDemocratic approach,sometimes peer bullyingMulticulturalism, Ethno mathematicsDemocratic approachPhilosophy of every idea’s beingvaluable, regardless of its being true orfalseEnsuring that the student feels mentallyand physically comfortable (freedom ofdress)Teacher RoleTraditional teacher role, guideand mentorGuideInquisitive, enthusiastic for self-im-provementinnovator, participant in conferencesand congressesKnowledgeable about the terminologyof mathematics educationMeasurementand EvaluationApproachesIn-class evaluation toolsStandardized tests used in the wholeprovince, teacher opinions and class-room evaluation tools

When the table is examined, it is seen that there are differences in mathematics classrooms of the two countries in terms of physical structure of the classroom, instructional activities, classroom culture, teacher role and measurement and evaluation approaches.

When evaluated physically, it is seen that the classroom in Canada is structured to create a rich learning environment for students and to support their personal development. There are computers, projectors, screens, all kinds of materials (unit cube, geometry board, counting stamps, and pattern blocks) and stationery that are located separately for the use of teachers and students in the classroom environment. In the classroom environment, themed corners are planned, where students can sit and study according to the subject (such as a chat and reading corner with carpets and cushions, a writing and study corner with tables and chairs, a library corner). Students have personal lockers where they can leave their personal belongings outside the classroom and take only water and worksheets requested by the teacher into the class. There are small presentation boards for students to use in the classroom, and in almost every lesson, students present their solutions to the class by using these boards instead of notebooks. The school in Turkey is a public school. More similarity could have been obtained had the study been conducted in a private school. The observed school in Canada is a private school. In the interviews with the teacher, she stated that Canadian school have similar physical standard.

There is freedom of dress for both students and teachers. There are studies carried out in all corners of the classroom, and an environment where students can feel comfortable has been created. There is no textbook followed. Students use worksheets and activity sheets given by the teacher. The role of the researcher here was that of the assistant teacher. She supported the students in one-to-one question solutions and helped the teacher from time to time. The teacher is a primary teacher with professional experience of 17 years. She is an innovative teacher following trainings, conferences and congresses and is open to self-development. She is willing to participate in in-service training. She stated that the most important subject in mathematics education is conceptual learning. From both the interviews with the teacher and in-class observations, it was observed that she had a good command of the terminology used in mathematics education, and she consciously tried to include it in his practices. Based on the constructivist approach as a teaching method, she offered a learning environment enriched with materials and he used brainstorming and question-answer techniques and problem-solving approaches. It was observed that he allowed enough time for students to explore and frequently gave directions to allow students to experience cognitive conflict by asking inquirybased questions. A sample in-class dialogue is given below.

In the last lesson, for the 3x24 operation, I first multiplied twenty by three, then multiplied four by three, and added the two. This was my solution strategy. Let's continue with a similar question.

6x48=?

First, what is asked in the question? Who wants to explain?” (teacher)

It means multiplying 2 numbers.” (student)

Well, you know these numbers. You know how to multiply. You can solve it however you want.” (teacher)

I couldn’t find a strategy.” (student)

It doesn’t matter, whatever it means to you, you can solve accordingly.” (teacher)

Meanwhile, he is examining the solutions of the students and giving directions.

I can see that you have found a lot of strategies. This is nice.”.

When the table is examined, it is seen that the Canadian classroom has a wealth of cognitive tasks, contents and approaches to develop students’ problem-solving and reasoning skills. The teacher handles problem solving and reasoning together and displays a constructivist teaching approach based on research and inquiry in the process. Brainstorming and cognitive conflict are techniques he uses to increase student interest and motivation in discussions and introductions. Classroom activities are carried out both individually and in groups. The teacher performs a detailed homework checking and gives feedback. More higher-order problems and situations involving multiple tasks are presented in the lessons, and rich course materials, including technology, are allowed to be used for solutions. He provides the opportunity to use different solutions and tries to give the right to speak to each student in every lesson. He includes guiding questions for control and going back for the metacognitive process to work actively. He includes skills such as estimation, generalization and inference in order to develop students’ reasoning skills. He encourages students to use different mathematical language and develop their own methods when explaining their ideas. A sample in-class dialogue is given below.

The teacher writes the following operation “67x3=?” on the small board in his hand. She asks everyone to solve this operation using their own strategies.

She gives them time by saying “everyone should have a strategy”, “When you have solved it, think of another solution”. Meanwhile, he examines students’ solutions then he starts a whole class discussion. She asks guiding questions such as “How many students solved using the close number?”, “Which close numbers did you use?”, “Which other numbers could have been used?”

She waits students to answer after asking the following question “3x70?” and then asks a new question “3x60?” He gives them the opportunity to explore different solutions by using the differences and number relations between the close numbers.

A very democratic classroom environment was observed during the entire time the researcher made observations. A learning environment, a classroom environment where different cultures, different languages and different religions have the same value, and where all thoughts are valued has been constructed (by celebrating the festivals and important days of different religions and cultures in the classroom). Although the official language used in the classroom is English, figures written in Chinese are hung in one corner of the classroom for a while during the observation period. Celebrations and holidays (Ramadan festival or Easter) belonging to different faiths are celebrated in the classroom environment. It is a common pattern of behaviour to express mathematical opinions and ideas without worrying about being wrong and to listen to each other respectfully. During the whole time the researcher was in the classroom environment, no physical or verbal humiliation or peer bullying was observed. Although the teacher follows the curriculum, there is flexibility in planning and timing. For measurement and evaluation, standard tests used on a provincial basis, teacher opinions and in-class evaluation tools are used.

The school in the case of Turkey is a public primary school located in the ankaya district of the city of Ankara. As the source of the course, the textbook prepared by the Ministry of National Education and the worksheets given by the teacher are used. The teacher has 25 years of professional experience. He gives information mostly through lecturing, which we can call a traditional approach, and uses the question-answer method and rarely the constructivist approach. Concepts and definitions are given by the teacher; he is of the opinion that activity-based teaching is important for mathematics education, but traditional teaching is more dominant during practices. A sample in-class dialogue is given below.

Now we can proceed into a new subject. Our subject is patterns, now look at your books.

“Last year, we handled patterns, what do we understand when we say pattern?” “Ordering of numbers” (student)

“What else?”(teacher)

“Numbers, objects” (student)

“What do we call the ordering of numbers and objects according to a certain rule? Pattern …is this ordering a random ordering? is this ordering a random ordering?”(teacher)

Silence in the classroom …

“No, of course, it has to be in a certain order, for example, 2 squares, 1 triangle, 3 pencils and 1 eraser, we can also create patterns with the items in our house, right? ….” (teacher)

“Yes” (the whole class)

“We arrange them according to a certain rule, such as 2 beans and 3 chickpeas. We also do it with numbers …” (teacher)

“How is the numbers ordered? one by one or two by two, how the numbers increased or decreased, 4,8,12,16,20,….yes, the numbers increase by 4, now let’s look at this …1,3,2,4,3 ……. they increase by 2 and decrease by 1”

“Do you remember?... well, we have even and odd numbers, what is an odd number? and what is an even number?”

Without waiting for students to answer, “the following numbers are odd numbers 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 and the following numbers are even numbers 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8”

For example, what is the ones digit in the number 13?”

“3” (the whole class)

3 is an odd number then the number is odd, as well. Is the number 20 an even number?” (teacher)

Yes” (the whole class)

Why is it an even number? Because its ones digit is an even number, isn’t it?” (teacher)

I want everyone to given an example in turn.

After this dialogue, the teacher starts using the smart board by telling them to write the information part in the textbook in their notebooks. Then, they proceed with the teaching of the subject and sample solutions. After the teacher poses the questions, he usually answers them without giving them a chance to find the answer.

In the case of Turkey, the teacher uses rather traditional approaches. Students are in the role of passive listeners and are less likely to encounter situations that will allow them to develop their own solutions. Group works and an effective discussion environment are observed less. It is seen that the teacher mostly uses the textbook and an online social education platform, does not use materials, does not manage an effective questioning process, and does not use problems involving higher-order and multiple mathematical tasks. A sample in-class dialogue is given below.

“Last year we learned how to perform addition operations with 2-digit numbers. Today, we will perform addition operations with 3-digit numbers. Now, everyone look at the board.”

The teacher writes the operation 245 + 143.

Remember that addition always starts with the smallest digit. Addition, subtraction, division, and multiplication always start with the ones digit. The digits of the numbers to be added are always written one under the other. Now let’s sum up. Five plus three is eight, four plus four is eight, two plus one is 3. What did we find? ….388.”

Much of her observed teaching is structured in what we might call traditional, where the teacher is dominant and gives information to the student by means of lecturing.

5. Results, discussion and suggestions

When all the findings are evaluated, it is seen that there are mostly differences as well as some similarities in terms of the general objectives of the curricula of both countries, in-class instructional activities and the physical structure of the classroom. In both curricula, objectives related to the development of similar skills are specified. In the Turkish curriculum there is no detail on how and in what way these skills are handled and statements about these skills are given only within the general objectives that the curriculum tries to achieve. It is prepared in a simpler format, definitions and long explanations are avoided. Mathematics skills are given only within the general objectives. In the Canadian curriculum, all skills are explained in detail and which skills should be addressed together is explained, as well.

In the Canadian curriculum, with the conviction that the students who know mathematical concepts well may still have difficulties in applying their knowledge in problem solving activities, because they have not yet internalized a model that can guide them throughout the process, a 4-stage problem solving model is defined and what is expected from students according to this model is explained. In the Turkish curriculum, statements about problem solving skills have been tried to be given only within the general objectives. There are no informative statements about how problem solving will be carried out, problem solving philosophy, process, model proposal that can be handled, and evaluation of problem solving. When compared in terms of the instructional activities carried out by the teachers to help students develop problem solving and reasoning skills, it was observed that the Canadian teacher handled problem solving and reasoning skills together, and worked on problem solving throughout the lesson. In addition, it was determined that she used methods and techniques making the student active, such as research and inquiry-based and problem solving-based approaches, brainstorming, discussion and group work. The teacher’s creating a state of cognitive conflict in students by means of higher-order questioning was observed in almost all the lessons. It was also observed that the problem situations used in the lessons included higher-order and multiple mathematical tasks, and the solutions and ways of thinking were definitely discussed in each lesson. In the case of Turkey, the teacher’s approach was largely teacher-centred. Group works and effective discussion environments were observed very little. The teacher mostly used the textbook and an online education platform, rarely use materials and problems involving higher-order and multiple mathematical tasks. It can be said that the differences observed in all the instructional activities used by the teachers is due to the differences in the curricula. It was observed that the Canadian teacher integrated the situations mentioned and suggested in the curriculum into his lessons.

For parent involvement, it is seen that the importance of involving student parents in the process is emphasized and it is stated that parents have an important role in supporting student learning in Canada curriculum. It is also emphasized that by becoming familiar with the curriculum, parents can learn what is taught in each class and what their children are expected to learn, and this awareness will improve the ability of parents to discuss schoolwork with their children, communicate with teachers, and ask questions about their children’s development. Another difference identified is that the duties of school principals are also included in the Canada curriculum. School principals work in partnership with teachers and parents to ensure that every student has access to the best possible educational experience. In order to support student learning, principals ensure that the Ontario curriculum is appropriately implemented in all classrooms, using a variety of teaching approaches, and provide appropriate resources for teachers and students.

As known, Canada receives thousands of immigrants every year. Thus, it can be possible to make changes on some or all of the expectations of the curriculum, depending on the student’s competence of English, in order to minimize the problems to be encountered by the children of immigrant families. Mainly as a natural consequence of immigration, the cultural makeup (religious, racial, and linguistic) of the school-age population in Canada is diverse. This situation directly affects school life in terms of many factors such as education and instruction given in schools. Considering this cultural diversity, a suitable learning environment has been created for students from different cultural backgrounds. Ethnomathematical situations have been observed in the Canadian classroom as a reflection of multiculturalism. A democratic environment has been created in which opinions can be easily expressed whether right or wrong, teachers and students do not judge each other, do not humiliate each other, and peer bullying is not observed. Canada’s most important educational goal is to create understanding between all cultures in a country that is a cultural mosaic (Yazıcı 2009).

In Turkey, a democratic classroom environment were mostly observed but peer bullying was also been observed from time to time. Peer bullying is a striking situation that emerged in the observations of the mathematics lessons. In Turkey, selection exams are held for entrance to high schools and universities. These exams have become a part of the system. The reflections of the enacted competition can be seen even in primary school times. Peer bullying may be due to the idea of seeing a friend as an opponent.

The physical infrastructure of the school in Canada is better than that of the schools in Turkey. This might be related to factors such as resources allocated to education, teacher training and teaching conditions, economic conditions, number of students and population. The Canadian classroom is a living classroom environment designed to make the student feel mentally and physically comfortable.

With this study, the differences and similarities between the two countries were tried to be revealed. There is a need to compare the results with more comprehensive studies. Naturally, nations are not expected to change their education systems immediately based on the results of comparative international studies, but the effects can be observed over time.

NOTES

1. OECD, 2018. PISA 2018 Results: What Students Know and Can Do How Did Countries Perform in PISA 2018. Available from http://abdigm.meb.gov.tr/ meb_iys_dosyalar/2019_12/05140122_OECD_PISA_2018_Raporu_V1.pdf. [viewed 2019-15-08].

2. MINISTERY OF EDUCATION [MoNE], 1973. Milli Eğitim Temel Kanunu-1739 Sayılı Kanun, Available from https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/ MevzuatMetin/1.5.1739.pdf. [viewed 2017-01-20] [In Turkish].

3. MINISTERY OF NATIONAL EDUCATION [MoNE], 2009. Milli Eğitim Müdürlüğü İlköğretim 6.-8. Sınıf Matematik „ğretim Programı Kitabı, Ankara: Devlet Kitapları Müdürlüğü [In Turkish].

4. MINISTERY OF NATIONAL EDUCATION [MoNE], 2013. Ortaokul Matematik Dersi „ğretim Programı, [viewed 10 December 2015]. Available from http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/guncellenen-ogretim-programlari/icerik/151. [viewed 2015-01-20] [In Turkish].

5. MINISTERY OF NATIONAL EDUCATION [MoNE], 2018. Matematik Dersi „ğretim Programı İlkokul ve Ortaokul 1 – 8 Sınıflar. Available from http:// mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=329. [Viewed 2018-01-01] [In Turkish].

6. NCTM, 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics, National Council of Mathematics, Reston, VA: Author.

7. ONTARIO MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, 2005. The Ontario Curriculum, Grades 1–8: Mathematics. Toronto, ON: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.

RERERENCES

CONNELLY, F. M.; XU, S., 2019. Reciprocal Learning in the Partnership Project: From Knowing to Doing in Comparative Research Models. Teachers and Teaching, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 627 – 646.

ERDOĞAN, İ., 2003. Karşılaştırmalı Eğitim: Türk Eğitim Bilimleri alışmaları İŒinde „nemsenmesi Gereken Bir Alan. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 265 – 282 [In Turkish].

ERG…N, M.; „ZMANTAR, M. F.; BAY, E. & AGA, G., 2015. Cumhuriyetin İlanından Günümüze Eğitimde, Program Geliştirmede ve Matematik Programlarında Yaşanan Değişim ve Gelişimler. In: M. F. „ZMANTAR, A. „ZT…RK VE E, BAY (Eds.), Reform ve Değişim Bağlamında İlkokul Matematik „ğretim Programları, pp. 407 – 424. Ankara: Pegem Akademi [In Turkish].

G…RKAN, G.; G„KE, E., 1999. Türkiye'de ve eşitli …lkelerde İlköğretim. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi [In Turkish].

G…ZEL, İ., 2010. Türkiye, Almanya, Kanada Ortaöğretim Matematik „ğretim Programlarının Karşılaştırmalı Değerlendirilmesi. Master Theses. Zonguldak Karaelmas University. Available from: https://tez. yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=_maeSOXUo9tIxAU4zA oqug&no=MvhhJAEXMU8E2cRqGtY8Rw.[Viewed 2018-01-01], [In Turkish].

KING, E., 1979. Other schools and ours comparative studies for today. London: Holt.

MAVİ, D.; YAYKIRAN, Z.; ELEVİK, M.A., 2020. Karşilaştirmali Eğitime Başlarken. In: ARASTAMAN, G (Eds.), Karşılaştırmalı ve uluslararası eğitim. Ankara: Pegem Akademi [In Turkish].

„ZDİNER ARSLAN, S. & SAVAŞER, S., 2009. Okulda Zorbalık. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, vol. 39, no. 184, pp. 218 – 227 [In Turkish].

T…RKOĞLU, A., 1985. Fransa, İsveŒ ve Romanya Eğitim Sistemleri Ankara: Ankara …niversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Basımevi [In Turkish].

T…RKOĞLU, A., 1998. Karşılaştırmalı Eğitim: “Dünya …lkelerinden „rneklerle”. Adana: Baki Kitabevi [In Turkish].

TOPTAŞ, V.; ELKATMIŞ, M. & KARACA, T., 2012. İlköğretim 4. Sınıf Matematik Programının „ğrenme Alanları ile Matematik „ğrenci alışma Kitabındaki Soruların Zihinsel Alanlarının TIMMS’e göre İncelenmesi. Ahi Evran …niversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.13, no.1, pp. 17 – 29 [In Turkish].

…NAL, F.; …NAL, M., 2010. Türkiye’de Ortaöğretim Programlarının Gelişimi. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, no. 1, pp. 110 – 125 [In Turkish].

YAZICI, İ., 2009. Türk Eğitim Sistemi ile Kanada Eğitim Sistemlerinin Karşılaştırılması, (Unpublished master theses). Yeditepe University, Istanbul.

YILDIRIM, A.; ŞİMŞEK, H., 2008. Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seckin Yayinlari [In Turkish].

YILDIZ, R.; YILMAZ, M.P.; ALBANNA, S., 2020. G. ARASTAMAN Eğitimde Karşılaştırmalar Nasıl Yapılır? In: ARASTAMAN, G. (Eds.), Karşılaştırmalı ve Uluslararası Eğitim, Ankara: Pegem Akademi. [In Turkish].

2025 година
Книжка 7
INSIGHTS FROM EXPLORING PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS ON CORE CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERCULTURAL EDUCATION

Prof. Dr. Bujar Adili, Prof. Dr. Arbresha Zenki-Dalipi, Prof. Dr. Jehona Rushidi-Rexhepi

ВРЪЗКА НА СОЦИАЛНО-ЕМОЦИОНАЛНОТО С КОГНИТИВНОТО РАЗВИТИЕ В ПРИОБЩАВАЩА СРЕДА

Проф. д.п.н. Милен Замфиров, проф. д.н. Маргарита Бакрачева, проф. д-р Емилия Евгениева

ПРОГНОЗИРАНЕ НА УСПЕВАЕМОСТТА НА СТУДЕНТИТЕ: СЪВРЕМЕННИ МОДЕЛИ И ТЕХНИКИ

Доц. д-р Силвия Гафтанджиева, проф. д-р Росица Донева

Книжка 6
FORMATION OF INCLUSIVE COMPETENCE OF HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENTS IN THE FIELD OF KNOWLEDGE 01 EDUCATION/PEDAGOGY

Dr. Oksana Dmitriieva, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Olena Chopik, Assoc. Prof., Prof. Dr. Svitlana Mykhalska

КОГНИТИВНО РАЗВИТИЕ НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ, ОБХВАНАТИ В ПРИОБЩАВАЩОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Проф. д.п.н. Милен Замфиров, проф. д-р Емилия Евгениева, проф. д.н. Маргарита Бакрачева

Книжка 5
COMPETENCE FOR SOCIAL PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICE: WHAT DO STUDENTS TELL US?

Dr. Maya Tcholakova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Marina Pironkova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Aleksandar Ranev, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Yana Staneva, Assist. Prof.

“LEARNING THROUGH RESEARCH” AS A STRATEGIC DIRECTION OF MODERNIZATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION

Dr. Tetiana Franchuk, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Lesia Ruda, Prof. Dr. Svitlana Myronova

MULTIMODAL COMMUNICATION IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION CLASSES

Prof. Dr. Cristiana Lucretia Pop, Dr. Cristina Filip, Assist. Prof.

Книжка 4s
GAMES IN FUNCTION OF DEVELOPMENT OF MULTIPLICATION SKILLS

Dasare Sylejmani, PhD student, Prof. Dr. Vesna Makashevska, Prof. Dr. Jasmina Jovanovska

Книжка 4
MILITARY AND SOCIAL THREATS AS DETERMINANTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONTEMPORARY UKRAINIAN HIGHER EDUCATION

Prof. Mykola Pantiuk, DSc., Prof. Tetiana Pantiuk, DSc. Prof. Nataliia Bakhmat, DSc. Prof. Olena Nevmerzhytska, DSc., Dr. Svitlana Ivakh, Assoc. Prof.

STEM ОБУЧЕНИЕ НА СТУДЕНТИ ПЕДАГОЗИ В ТРАНСДИСЦИПЛИНАРНА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА СРЕДА

Проф. д.н. Любен Витанов, проф. д-р Николай Цанев, гл. ас. д-р Людмила Зафирова, гл. ас. д-р Гергана Христова, ас. Катерина Динкова, Калина Георгиева, Жорж Кюшев, Здравка Савчева

ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ И АНАЛИЗ НА НАГЛАСИТЕ НА СТУДЕНТИТЕ ПРИ ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА ГЕНЕРАТИВЕН ИНСТРУМЕНТ НА ИЗКУСТВЕН ИНТЕЛЕКТ

Доц. д-р Николай Янев, гл. ас. д-р Иглика Гетова Доц. д-р Теодора Христова Гл. ас. д-р Ива Костадинова, проф. д-р Георги Димитров

Книжка 3
ОЦЕНКИ И НАГЛАСИ КЪМ ПРОЦЕДУРИТЕ ЗА ПОДБОР НА ДИРЕКТОРИ НА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИ ИНСТИТУЦИИ – ПЪРВОНАЧАЛНИ ДАННИ

Доц. д-р Йонка Първанова, доц. д-р Божидара Кривирадева, Данко Калапиш, Деяна Милушева

ДРУГИЯТ КАТО ЦЕННОСТ В УЧИЛИЩЕ

Гл. ас. д-р Александър Кръстев

Книжка 2
ASSESSMENTS OF TEACHERS AND PARENTS OF CHILDREN WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ON INCLUSION IN PRE-SCHOOL INSTITUTIONS

Prof. Zagorka Markov, DSc. Prof. Hadzi Zivorad Milenovic, DSc. Prof. Biljana Jeremic, DSc., Radmila Zecevic, Assist. Prof. Mrs. Milica Pavlovic

INTEGRATING COOPERATIVE LEARNING IN DISTANCE EDUCATION FOR METHODOLOGY OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS COURSE

Dr. Aleksandar Milenković, Assist. Prof., Mrs. Jelena Stevanić, PhD student.

Книжка 1s
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА СРЕДСТВАТА ЗА ДОПЪЛВАЩА И АЛТЕРНАТИВНА КОМУНИКАЦИЯ В ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИТЕ ИНСТИТУЦИИ В БЪЛГАРИЯ

Проф. д-р. Неда Балканска, доц. д-р. Анна Трошева-Асенова, доц. д-р. Пенка Шапкова, ас. Снежина Михайлова

USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING

Prof. Dr. Ekaterina Sofronieva, Dr. Christina Beleva, Assist. Prof., Dr. Galina Georgieva, Assoc. Prof.

САМООЦЕНКА НА КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТИТЕ В ПРОЦЕСА НА ОБУЧЕНИЕ В СПЕЦИАЛНОСТ „СОЦИАЛНА ПЕДАГОГИКА“: ПРЕДВАРИТЕЛНИ РЕЗУЛТАТИ

Доц. д-р Мая Чолакова, д-р Мартин Ценов, д-р Цветослав Николов, д-р Красимир Костов

Книжка 1
Скъпи читатели, автори, приятели на списание „Педагогика“,

В началото на 2025 година в първия брой на нашето списание „Педагогика“ бих искала от името на редакционната колегия и от мое име да Ви пожелая здраве, творческо вдъхновение и професионално удовлетворение от прино- са Ви към педагогическата наука и практика! Вярвам и се надявам, че списание „Педагоги- ка“ ще продължи да осигурява платформа за научен, обективен и откровен диалог, базиран на резултати от научни изследвания, за насто- ящето и бъдещето на обучението и образова- н

TRENDS IN SCIENCE EDUCATION FROM THE DIGITAL PERSPECTIVE: A STUDY SUPPORTED BY A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

Dr. Ivelina Kotseva, Assist. Prof., Dr. Maya Gaydarova, Assoc. Prof.

РЕЗУЛТАТИ ОТ ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА ГЛАГОЛНА СЕМАНТИКА ПРИ ДЕЦА ЧРЕЗ ЕЗИКОВИ ЗАДАЧИ, ПРОВЕДЕНИ ОНЛАЙН

Д-р Валентина Стефанова, д-р Мария Тодорова, доц. д-р Цветана Димитрова

2024 година
Книжка 9s
Книжка 9
ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT OF VIDEO LEARNING RESOURCES IN SMALL-SCALE LEARNING SCENARIOS

Mr. Csar C–rcoles, Dr. Laia Blasco-Soplon, Dr. Germ†n Cobo Rodr‘guez, Dr. Ana-Elena Guerrero-Rold†n

USING DIGITAL EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES TO PROMOTE INTERCULTURAL INTERACTION OF THE FUTURE ECONOMISTS IN THE EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT

Dr. Oksana Tynkaliuk, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Vira Chornii, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Oksana Kutsa, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Mariana Karanevych, Assoc. Prof.

ДОБРОВОЛЧЕСТВОТО КАТО ВЪЗМОЖНОСТ ЗА ОСИГУРЯВАНЕ НА РАВЕН ДОСТЪП ДО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ ЗА ВСИЧКИ

(Резултати от проучване мнението на учители и студенти) Доц. д-р Стефан Милетиев

Книжка 8
АНГАЖИРАНОСТ КЪМ УЧЕНЕ ЧРЕЗ ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА СМАРТ ТЕХНОЛОГИИТЕ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Проф. д-р Кирилка Тагарева, проф. д.п.н. Дора Левтерова-Гаджалова, доц. д-р Ваня Сивакова

DIGITAL STORYTELLING AS A METHOD OF ACHIEVING VISUAL LITERACY

Dr. Silvana Karagyozova, Assist. Prof.

Книжка 7
Книжка 6
LEVELS OF SELF-EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY OF STUDENTS OF HUMANITARIAN FACULTIES OF THE UNIVERSITY

Dr. Iryna Sereda, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Nina Stelmah, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 5s
ИЗМЕРЕНИЯ НА ЦЕННОСТНИЯ ПОДХОД В АКАДЕМИЧНАТА ПОДГОТОВКА И ПРАКТИКАТА НА СОЦИАЛНИТЕ РАБОТНИЦИ

Проф. д-р Лиляна Стракова, доц. д-р Росица Симеонова, гл. ас. д-р Атанас Генчев

СТУДЕНТИТЕ ОТ СПЕЦИАЛНОСТ „НЕФОРМАЛНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ“ В УСЛОВИЯТА НА СТАЖАНТСКАТА ПРЕДДИПЛОМНА ПРАКТИКА – ПОДГОТОВКА, ВЪВЕЖДАНЕ, ЗАЩИТА

Доц. д-р Владислав Господинов, гл. ас. д-р Галина Георгиева, Румяна Георгиева-Илиева, Мирослава Славейкова

ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВАТА НА СТАЖАНТСКАТА ПРАКТИКА ПРЕД СТУДЕНТИ – БЪДЕЩИ УЧИТЕЛИ

Доц. д-р Илиана Петкова, гл. ас. д-р Марияна Илиева, Владислава Станоева, Георги Чавдаров

ПРЕДДИПЛОМНАТА ПРАКТИЧЕСКА ПОДГОТОВКА НА СТУДЕНТИТЕ ОТ СПЕЦИАЛНОСТ „СОЦИАЛНИ ДЕЙНОСТИ“ КАТО ОСНОВА ЗА ТЯХНАТА БЪДЕЩА ПРОФЕСИОНАЛНА РЕАЛИЗАЦИЯ

Гл. ас. д-р Анета Рашева, Русана Гаджанова, гл. ас. д-р Александър Христов, проф. д.п.н. Моника Богданова

Книжка 5
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, ALGORITHM LITERACY, LOCUS OF CONTROL, AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE SKILLS: A STUDY AMONG BULGARIAN STUDENTS IN EDUCATION

Prof. Dr. Ekaterina Sofronieva, Dr. Christina Beleva, Assist. Prof. Dr. Galina Georgieva, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Stefan Markov, Assist. Prof.

FEATURES OF SPEECH COMPREHENSION TRAINING OF CHILDREN WITH AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS

Dr. Maryna Branytska Prof. Dr. Svitlana Myronova, Dr. Svitlana Mykhalska, Assoc. Prof.

OVERVIEW OF THE STEM EDUCATION IN ISRAEL

Aharon Goldreich Dr. Elena Karashtranova, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 4
НАГЛАСИ НА СТУДЕНТИТЕ КЪМ СМАРТ ТЕХНОЛОГИИТЕ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Проф. д.п.н. Дора Левтерова-Гаджалова, проф. д-р Кирилка Тагарева, доц. д-р Ваня Сивакова

PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT FOR YOUNG RESEARCHERS

Prof. Emina Vukašinović, DSc., Dr. Marija Veselinović, Assist. Prof., Dr. Milan Milikić, Assist. Prof.

РОБОТИТЕ В ОБУЧЕНИЕТО – ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА STEAM ИГРА

Ас. д-р Мария Желязкова, гл. ас. д-р Михаил Кожухаров, доц. д-р Даниела Кожухарова

Книжка 3s
ANALYSIS OF THE DIGITAL COMPETENCIES OF PHYSICS TEACHERS IN BULGARIA ACCORDING TO THE DIGCOMPEDU FRAMEWORK

Dr. Ivelina Kotseva, Assist. Prof., Dr. Maya Gaydarova, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 3
ДИГИТАЛНИ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ПОДКРЕПА НА УЧЕНЕТО

Доц. д-р Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова, доц. д-р Лъчезар Лазаров

SOCIAL INTEREST AND STRESS TOLERANCE

Prof. Zhaneta Stoykova, DSc.

PREPARATION OF FUTURE TEACHERS FOR ORGANISING A HEALTH-PRESERVING INCLUSIVE SPACE IN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

Prof. Nadiya Skotna, DSc. Dr. Tetiana Nadimyanova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Anna Fedorovych, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Myroslava Sosiak, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Oksana Yatsiv, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 2s
METHOD FOR SOLVING SYSTEM OF LINEAR EQUATIONS MXN, M=1, 2, 3; BASED ON ITS GEOMETRICAL INTERPRETATIONS

Prof. Zoran Misajleski, DSc., Prof. Daniel Velinov, DSc. Prof. Aneta Velkoska, DSc.

Книжка 2
ОТ РИСУНКА – КЪМ СНИМКА

Доц. д-р Камен Теофилов

STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITY OF TEACHERS OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS: THE INFLUENCE OF SOCIAL CONDITIONS

Prof. Dr. Nadiia Vientseva, Dr. Oksana Orhiiets, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Anetta Omelchenko, Assoc. Prof. Stanislav Romanchuk

Книжка 1s
CHALLENGES TO ENTREPRENEURSHIP EDUCATION IN HIGH SCHOOL. INTERACTION BETWEEN FORMAL AND INFORMAL ASSESSMENT

Dr. Vilyana Ruseva, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Stela Baltova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Evgeniya Nikolova, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 1
„ВТОРОТО“ БЪЛГАРСКО УЧИЛИЩЕ. ГЕНЕЗИСЪТ

Проф. д.п.н. Пенка Цонева, доц. д-р Бистра Мизова

EMANCIPATORY EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICES

Luka Nikolić, Assist. Prof. Dr. Aleksandar Tadić , Assoc. Prof.

INNOVATIVE PRACTICES IN TEACHERS’ AND STUDENTS’ TRAININGS

Dr. Ivelina Velcheva, Assist. Prof., Dr. Deyana Peykova

2023 година
Книжка 9
EXPLORING THE NARRATIVE IDENTITY OF HUNGARIAN TEACHERS IN SLOVAKIA

Dr. Patrik Baka, Dr. Terzia Stredl, Dr. Kinga Horv†th Dr. Zsuzsanna Husz†r Dr. Melinda Nagy, Dr. Pter T–th, Prof. DSc. Andr†s Nmeth

Книжка 8
КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТНИЯТ ПРОФИЛ НА УЧИТЕЛЯ – ПОДГОТОВКА В УНИВЕРСИТЕТСКА СРЕДА

Проф. д.п.н. Сийка Чавдарова-Костова, ас. д-р Екатерина Томова

A QUALITY “ONLINE” TEACHER – WHAT DO STUDENTS APPRECIATE AND VALUE IN TEACHERS DURING DISTANCE LEARNING?

Dr. Irena Golubović-Ilić, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Ivana Ćirković-Miladinović, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Nataša Vukićević, Assoc. Prof.

SUPPORT FOR THE INCLUSION OF ROMA CHILDREN THROUGH THE PROJECT TEACHING MODEL

Prof. Biljana Jeremić, DSc., Prof. Aleksandra Trbojević, DSc., Prof. Bojan Lazić, DSc., Prof. Gordana Kozoderović, DSc.

TREND ANALYSIS OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCES OF SPORTS TEACHERS AND COACHES

Dr. Sergejs Capulis, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Valerijs Dombrovskis, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Svetlana Guseva, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Alona Korniseva, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 7
DEVELOPMENT OF THE DIGITAL COMPETENCES OF PERSPECTIVE PRIMARY-SCHOOL TEACHERS

Prof. Dr. Vladimira Angelova, Dr. Hilda Terlemezyan, Assoc. Prof.

ЦЕННОСТЕН ПРОФИЛ НА УЧИТЕЛИТЕ В НАЦИОНАЛЕН КОНТЕКСТ

Проф. д.с.н. Цветан Давидков, доц. д-р Силвия Цветанска

STEM ОБУЧЕНИЕ В НАЧАЛНИТЕ КЛАСОВЕ: ГОТОВИ ЛИ СА УЧИТЕЛИТЕ?

Доц. д-р Любка Алексиева, проф. д-р Илиана Мирчева

Книжка 6s
TWO STROKE DUAL FUEL ENGINE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS ON LIQUID AND GAS FUEL MODE RELATED TO THE NEW TRAINING DEMANDS FOR MARINE ENGINEERS

Dr. Delyan Hristov, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Dimitar Vasilev, Assist. Prof., Iliyan Kurtev, Аssist. Prof.

MODELLING OF MARITIME CYBER SECURITY EDUCATION AND TRAINING

Dr. Gizem Kayisoglu, Dr. Pelin Bolat, Dr. Emre Duzenli

INTRODUCING THE USE OF CASE STUDIES METHODOLOGY IN TRAINING FOR SOFT SKILLS IN MARITIME UNIVERSITIES. THE ISOL-MET PROGRAM

Prof. Dr. Maria Lekakou, Dr. Helen Iakovaki, Assist. Prof. Dimitris Vintzilaios Markella Gota Giorgos Georgoulis Thalia Vintzilaiou

IMPLEMENTING INNOVATIVE APPROACHES AND LEARNING METHODS IN MARITIME EDUCATION

Dr. Valentina Grancharova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Siyana Lutzkanova, Assoc. Prof.

THE ROLE OF MARITIME EDUCATION IN DIGITALIZATION

Dr. Kamelia Narleva, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Yana Gancheva, Assist. Prof.

Книжка 6
С МИСИЯ ЗА НАЦИОНАЛНА И КУЛТУРНА ИНДИВИДУАЛНОСТ

(По повод 135 години от откриването на първия Висш педагогически курс в България (1888) Доц. д-р Надежда Кръстева, проф. д.н. Йордан Колев

THE ROLE OF THE SPECIAL TEACHER IN THE FORMATION OF MOTIVATION FOR EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES OF STUDENTS WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES

Dr. Svitlana Mykhalska, Assoc. Prof., Prof. Dr. Svitlana Myronova, Dr. Tetiana Dokuchyna, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Maryana Buinyak

Книжка 5s
PREFACE

Nikola Vaptsarov Naval Academy is the oldest technical educational institution in Bulgaria. The Naval Academy is one of the symbols of Varna and Bulgaria in the world maritime community. Its history and achievements establish it as the most prestigious center for training of maritime specialists. At present, the Naval Academy trains specialists for the Navy and for the merchant marine in all areas of maritime life. Research and development conducted at the Naval Academy in Varna

A FAIR CONCERN ABOUT ECDIS

Nikolay Sozonov, Assist. Prof. Dr. Dilyan Dimitranov, Assist. Prof.

COMPOSING A STANDARD FOR ELECTRONIC CHART DISPLAY AND INFORMATION SYSTEM TYPE SPECIFIC TRAINING

Dr. Dimitar Komitov, Assist. Prof. Aleksandrina Angelova, Assist. Prof.

DATA-DRIVEN LEARNING APPROACH TO MARITIME ENGLISH

Jana Kegalj, Dr. Mirjana Borucinsky, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sandra Tominac Coslovich, Assoc. Prof.

DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS THROUGH THE “CASE STUDY” TEACHING METHOD IN MARITIME ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING (MELT)

Tamila Mikeladze, Assoc. Prof. Svetlana Rodinadze, Assoc. Prof. Prof. Dr. Zurab Bezhanovi, Kristine Zarbazoia, Assoc. Prof. Medea Abashidze, Assoc. Prof. Kristine Iakobadze

USING REALISTIC MOVIES AS AN ATTRACTIVE STRATEGY FOR TEACHING MARITIME ENGLISH

Dr. Svitlana Korieshkova, Assoc. Prof., Maria Didenko

MAXIMIZING STUDENTS’ LEARNING IN MARITIME ENGLISH ONLINE COURSE

Prof. Dr. Valentyna Kudryavtseva, Dr. Svitlana Barsuk, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Olena Frolova, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 5
ОЦЕНКА НА ОБЩООБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИТЕ И РЕСУРСНИТЕ УЧИТЕЛИ ЗА РАБОТА В ПАРАДИГМАТА НА ПРИОБЩАВАЩОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Проф. д.п.н. Милен Замфиров, проф. д-р Емилия Евгениева, проф. д-р Маргарита Бакрачева

Книжка 4s
Книжка 4
COMPARISON OF 3

Dr. Zeynep Sonay Ay, Assist. Prof.

СЛОВА ЗА ТРИНАДЕСЕТ ПЕДАГОЗИ И ПСИХОЛОЗИ

Проф. д.пс. и д.п.н. Любен Ст. Георгиев

ЗА ПРИОБЩАВАЩАТА КЛАСНА СТАЯ В ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА СРЕДА

Проф. д.п.н. Дора Левтерова-Гаджалова

Книжка 3s
СПИРАЛАТА ОБЩЕСТВО – ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Проф. д-р Иванка Шивачева-Пинеда

ПРОУЧВАНЕ УДОВЛЕТВОРЕНОСТТА НА МЛАДИТЕ ХОРА В БЪЛГАРИЯ ОТ ОНЛАЙН ОБУЧЕНИЕТО

Проф. д-р Веселина Иванова Проф. д.п.н. Елеонора Милева

Книжка 3
СРАВНИТЕЛЕН АНАЛИЗ НА НАГЛАСИТЕ НА ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛИ И СТУДЕНТИ КЪМ ПЛАТФОРМАТА ЗА ДИСТАНЦИОННО ОБУЧЕНИЕ MOODLE В КОНТЕКСТА НА ПАНДЕМИЯТА ОТ COVID-19

Проф. д-р Веселина Вълканова, проф. д.н. Андреана Ефтимова, гл. ас. д-р Мая Стоянова, ас. д-р Йордан Карапенчев

ПРОЕКТНО БАЗИРАНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ ЗА СОЦИАЛНО-ЕМОЦИОНАЛНИ И ТЕХНОЛОГИЧНИ УМЕНИЯ ЧРЕЗ ПРОГРАМАТА „УМЕНИЯ ЗА ИНОВАЦИИ“

Проф. д-р Галин Цоков, д-р Александър Ангелов Йоанна Минчева Рени Димова, Мария Цакова

МЕДИЙНАТА ГРАМОТНОСТ И УЧИТЕЛИТЕ

Доц. д-р Светла Цанкова, доц. д-р Стела Ангова, гл. ас. д-р Мария Николова, гл. ас. д-р Иван Вълчанов, гл. ас. д-р Илия Вълков, д-р Георги Минев

Книжка 2
INTONATION AND CHILDREN WITH EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL PROBLEMS

Dr. Katerina Zlatkova-Doncheva, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Vladislav Marinov, Assoc. Prof.

ADVANTAGES OF USING GEOGEBRA SOFTWARE WHEN EXAMINING THE FLOW AND DRAWING A GRAPH OF A FUNCTION

Dr. Elena Gelova, Assist. Prof. Dr. Mirjana Vitanova, Assist. Prof.

Книжка 1
ДИСЦИПЛИНАРНАТА ПАРАДИГМА НА ДЖОН ЛОК

Проф. д-р Наталия Витанова

ЕЛЕКТРОННОТО ОБУЧЕНИЕ В КОНТЕКСТА НА ПРОДЪЛЖАВАЩАТА КВАЛИФИКАЦИЯ НА ДЪРЖАВНИТЕ СЛУЖИТЕЛИ

Доц. д-р Благовесна Йовкова, проф. д-р Румяна Пейчева-Форсайт

2022 година
Книжка 9
ТРАНСГРЕСИВНО-СИНЕРГИЧНО КАРИЕРНО РАЗВИТИЕ В „НЕФОРМАЛНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ“ В УНИВЕРСИТЕТА

Проф. д.п.н Яна Рашева-Мерджанова, проф. д.п.н. Моника Богданова, доц. д-р Илиана Петкова

Книжка 8
ADOPTION OF LMS MOODLE TOOLS IN STUDENT LEARNING – IN LINE WITH TEACHING PRACTICES

Dr. Silviya Blagoeva-Karamfilova, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Silvia Parusheva, Assoc. Prof.

INTEGRATING INTERCULTURAL EDUCATION IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOL CURRICULUM

Bujar Adili, Prof. Dr. Sonja Petrovska, Gzim Xhambazi

НАГЛАСИ НА БЪДЕЩИТЕ ДЕТСКИ УЧИТЕЛИ КЪМ STEM ПОДХОДА

Проф. д.н. Наталия Павлова Михаела Тончева

Книжка 7
НАЦИОНАЛНАТА ИДЕЯ НА ПАИСИЙ ХИЛЕНДАРСКИ

(Посвещава се на 300-годишнината от рождението на св. Паисий Хилендарски (1722 – 1773)) Проф. д.п.н. Йордан Колев, доц. д-р Надежда Кръстева

GENDER DIFFERENTIATION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF GENERAL SECONDARY EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

Dr. Nadiia Vientseva, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Olga Starokozhko

ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА ОСНОВНА ГЛАГОЛНА ЛЕКСИКА В БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕЗИК ПРИ УЧЕНИЦИ В НАЧАЛЕН ЕТАП НА ОБУЧЕНИЕ ЧРЕЗ ОНЛАЙН ИГРИ

Гл. ас. д-р Мария Тодорова, гл. ас. д-р Цветана Димитрова, гл. ас. д-р Валентина Стефанова

140 ГОДИНИ ПРЕДУЧИЛИЩНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ: ПОСТИЖЕНИЯ И ХОРИЗОНТИ

Енгелс-Критидис, Р., 2022. 140 години предучилищно образование в България: постижения и хоризонти. Юбилеен сборник. София: УИ „Св. Климент Охридски“, ISBN 978-954-07-5471-0

Книжка 6
COMMUNICATION COMPETENCE OF TEACHERS IN CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL-PEDAGOGICAL WORK

Dr. Mirko Miletic, DSc. Dr. Marko Djordjevic, Assoc. Prof.

МОДЕЛ НА УЧИЛИЩНА ГОТОВНОСТ

Доц. д-р Ася Велева

ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКО ПРЕДМЕТНО ЗНАНИЕ В ПРИРОДОНАУЧНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ: ТРУДНОСТИ ПО ОРГАНИЧНА ХИМИЯ

Доц. д-р Александрия Генджова, д-р Нина Маркова, Калин Чакъров

MODERN PRACTICE OF USING INTERACTIVE FORMS AND METHODS OF PREVENTIVE EDUCATION OF THE STUDENT YOUTH

Dr. Svitlana Surgova, Assist. Prof., Dr. Olena Faichuk, Assist. Prof.

Книжка 5
МОДЕЛ НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО НА БЪДЕЩЕТО

Проф. д-р Наталия Витанова

THE TECHNOLOGY OF DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNICATIVE CULTURE OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS

Prof. Dr. Mariia Oliiar , Prof. Dr. Nataliia Blahun , Prof. Dr. Halyna Bilavych , Prof. Dr. Nataliia Bakhmat Prof. Dr. Tetyana Pantyuk

Книжка 4
TEACHERS’ ATTITUDES BOUT TEACHING AND LEARNING MATHEMATICS

Dr. Aleksandra Mihajlović, Assoc. Prof. Prof. Emina Kopas-Vukašinović, DSc. Vladimir Stanojević

STUDENTS` ACTIVITIES IN THE DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT

Dr. Tatiana Shopova, Assoc. Prof.

EDUCATION 4.0 – THE CHANGE OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THE LABOUR MARKET

Dr. Gergana Dimitrova, Assist. Prof., Dr. Blaga Madzhurova, Assist. Prof., Dr. Stefan Raychev, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Dobrinka Stoyanova, Assoc.Prof.

TESTS IN SPECIALIZED LATIN FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES

Petkova, G., 2021. Tests for practice in class and self-preparation in Latin and specialized terminology for students of “Medicine”, “Dental medicine”, and “Pharmacy”. Part 1. Alphabet, pronunciation and accentuation; first and second declension – nouns and adjectives, complex clinical terms (Greek by origin). Plovdiv: Koala Press Publishing, ISBN 978-619-7536-94-2.

Книжка 3s
TEACHING IN THE DIGITAL AGE DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Prof. Dr. Madeleine Danova Prof. Danail Danov, DSc.

DISTANCE LEARNING IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMICS

Dr. Baktybek Keldibekov, Assoc. Prof. Shailoobek Karagulov

DIGITAL UNIVERSITIES: FEATURES AND KEY CHARACTERISTICS

Dr. Marina Skiba, Assoc. Prof. Prof. Maktagali Bektemessov, DSc. Dr. Alma Turganbayeva, Assist. Prof.

FEATURES OF THE FORMATION OF THE “SELF” CONCEPT OF STUDENTS USING DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Berik Matayev Prof. Dr. Kadisha Shalgynbayeva Dr. Zaru Kulsharipova, Assoc. Prof.

TEACHING ENGLISH PRONUNCIATION DURING THE COVID PANDEMIC

Dr. Snezhina Dimitrova, Assoc. Prof.

Книжка 3
MODULAR-CYBERNETIC APPROACH FOR DEVELOPMENT OF DIGITAL COMPETENCE OF STUDENTS – FUTURE TEACHERS

Assoc. Prof. Nikolay Tsankov, DSc. Dr. Ivo Damyanov, Assist. Prof.

INFLUENCE OF FAMILY EDUCATION ON THE PSYCHOPHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIALIZATION OF A CHILD WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES

Dr. Svitlana Mykhalska, Assoc. Prof., Prof. Dr. Svitlana Myronova, Dr. Maryana Buinyak

HUMANE EDUCATION – BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES

Dr. Anna Arnaudova-Otouzbirova, Assist. Prof.

Книжка 2
TWO-TIER MODEL OF TRAINING FUTURE TEACHERS FOR COACHING AT OUT-OF-SCHOOL INSTITUTIONS

Prof. Dr. Borys Savchuk Prof. Dr. Tetyana Pantyuk Dr. Natalia Sultanova, Assoc. Prof. Prof. Dr. Halyna Bilavych Prof. Dr. Mykola Pantyuk

UNIVERSITY LEARNING OUTCOMES: STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE WITHIN THE THEORY OF ILL-POSED PROBLEMS

Dr. Alma Turganbayeva Prof. Maktagali Bektemessov, DSc. Prof. Dr. Marina Skiba

Книжка 1
HEURISTIC POTENTIAL OF TRANSFORMATIVE LEARNING IDEAS

Prof. Dr. Svitlana Hanaba Dr. Olena Voitiuk, Assoc. Prof.

ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИ ПОДКАСТИ В ПРОФЕСИОНАЛНАТА ПОДГОТОВКА НА БЪДЕЩИ УЧИТЕЛИ ПО БИОЛОГИЯ

(В условията на епидемична обстановка, причинена от COVID-19) Доц. д-р Ася Асенова

2021 година
Книжка 9
ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЕТО МЕЖДУ ФОРМАЛНОТО И НЕФОРМАЛНОТО ЗДРАВНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Доц. д-р Вержиния Боянова Гл. ас. д-р Константин Теодосиев Гл. ас. д-р Берджухи Йорданова

FORMATION OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE OF ASSISTANT TEACHER OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN SECONDARY EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

Prof. Dr. Vladyslava Liubarets, Prof. Dr. Nataliia Bakhmat, Prof. Dr. Olena Matviienko, Oksana Tsykhmeistruk, Inna Feltsan

Книжка 8
ОТНОСНО ЗАДЪЛЖИТЕЛНОСТТА НА ПРЕДУЧИЛИЩНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ – РЕЗУЛТАТИ ОТ ЕДНО ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ

Проф. д-р Маргарита Колева, доц. д-р Блага Джорова, д-р Ева Жечева

INFLUENCE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PEDAGOGICAL FEATURES OF STUDENTS ON THEIR ACTIVITY IN SELF-EDUCATION

Dr. Iryna Sereda, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Svitlana Karskanova, Assoc. Prof.

CENTRALISATION AND DECENTRALISATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HUNGARY AND GERMANY

Carla Liege Rodrigues Pimenta, Prof. Dr. Zolt†n R–nay, Prof. Dr. Andr†s Nmet

ЗА ПРИОБЩАВАНЕТО, ОБУЧЕНИЕТО И РАЗВИТИЕТО НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ С ИНТЕЛЕКТУАЛНИ ЗАТРУДНЕНИЯ

Златкова-Дончева, К. (2021). Приобщаване, обучение и развитие на деца и ученици с интелектуални затруднения. Бургас: Либра СКОРП, ISBN 978-954-471-705-6

Книжка 7s
CONCEPT OF PRESENT PRACTICE IN CHOOSING OF OPTIMAL NUMBER OF TUGS

Rino Bošnjak, Zvonimir Lušić , Filip Bojić, Dario Medić

S-101 CHARTS, DATABASE TABLES FOR S-101 CHARTS, AUTONOMOUS VESSEL

Vladimir Brozović, Danko Kezić, Rino Bošnjak, Filip Bojić

INFLUENCE OF HYDRO-METEOROLOGICAL ELEMENTS ON THE SHIP MANOEUVRING IN THE CITY PORT OF SPLIT

Zvonimir Lušić , Nenad Leder, Danijel Pušić, Rino Bošnjak

MEETING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS – EXPERIENCE FROM THE LARGEST SHIPPING COMPANIES

Katarina Balić , Helena Ukić Boljat, Gorana Jelić Mrčelić, Merica Slišković

OPTIMISING THE REFERENCE POINT WITHIN A JOURNAL BEARING USING LASER ALIGNMENT

Ty Aaron Smith , Guixin Fan , Natalia Nikolova , Kiril Tenekedjiev

REVIEW OF THE CURRENT INCREASE OF NOISE UNIT COST VALUES IN TRANSPORT

Luka Vukić , Ivan Peronja , Mihaela Bukljaš , Alen Jugović

TARGET DETECTION FOR VISUAL COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM

Miro Petković, Danko Kezić, Igor Vujović, Ivan Pavić

NEW RESULTS FOR TEACHING SHIP HANDLING USING FAST TIME SIMULATION

Knud Benedict , MichŽle Schaub , Michael Baldauf , Michael Gluch , Matthias Kirchhoff , Caspar Krüger

POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF ELECTRICALY DRIVEN FERRY, CASE STUDY

Tina Perić, Ladislav Stazić, Karlo Bratić

SITUATIONAL AWARENESS – KEY SAFETY FACTOR FOR THE OFFICER OF THE WATCH

Hrvoje Jaram, Pero Vidan, Srđan Vukša, Ivan Pavić

Книжка 7
ХАОС(ЪТ)

Проф. д.н. Йордан Колев

INCLUSIVE INTELLIGENCE

Dr. Aleksandar Krastev, Assist. Prof.

EDUCATION OF MORAL CULTURE OF STUDENT YOUTH IN THE CONDITIONS OF POLYCULTURAL SPACE

Dr. Natalia Bondarenko, Assoc. Prof. Yevhen Rozdymakha Dr. Lyudmila Oderiy, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Anatoly Rozdymakha, Assoc. Prof. Dilyana Arsova, PhD student

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN KOSOVO – RESEARCH OF TRAINING PROGRAMS AND TESTS

Prof. Bekim Samadraxha Veton Alihajdari Prof. Besim Mustafa

Книжка 6s
EVALUATION OF CRUISER TRAFFIC VARIABLES IN SEAPORTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA

Maja Račić, Katarina Balić, Mira Pavlinović, Antonija Mišura

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CONTRACTS FOR MARITIME TRANSPORT SERVICES. CHAIN OF CHARTER PARTIES

Svetlana Dimitrakieva, Ognyan Kostadinov, Christiana Atanasova

THE LIGHTSHIP MASS CALCULATION MODEL OF A MERCHANT SHIP BY EMPIRICAL METHODS

Vedran Slapničar , Katarina Zadro , Viktor Ložar , Ivo Ćatipović

ON EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN MARITIME COMMUNICATIONS AND THE GMDSS DURING THE COVID-19

Chavdar Alexandrov, Grozdyu Grozev, Georgi Dimitrov, Avgustin Hristov

AIR POLLUTANT EMISSION MEASUREMENT

Nikola Račić, Branko Lalić, Ivan Komar, Frane Vidović, Ladislav Stazić

ASSESSMENT OF LNG BUNKERING ACCIDENTS

Peter Vidmar, Andrej Androjna

EGR OPERATION INFLUENCE ON THE MARINE ENGINE EFFICIENCY

Delyan Hristov, Ivan Ivanov, Dimitar Popov

THE MEASUREMENT OF EXHAUST GAS EMISSIONS BY TESTO 350 MARITIME – EXHAUST GAS ANALYZER

Bruna Bacalja, Maja Krčum, Tomislav Peša, Marko Zubčić

PROPELLER LOAD MODELLING IN THE CALCULATIONS OF MARINE SHAFTING TORSIONAL VIBRATIONS

Nenad Vulić, Karlo Bratić, Branko Lalić, Ladislav Stazić

MODELING OF THE DEPENDENCE OF CO

Hristo Hristov, Ivailo Bakalov, Bogdan Shopov, Dobromir Yovkov

TECHNICAL DIAGNOSTICS OF MARINE EQUIPMENT WITH PSEUDO-DISCRETE FEATURES

Guixin Fan , Natalia Nikolova , Ty Smith , Kiril Tenekedjiev

CONTRIBUTION TO THE REDUCTION OF THE SHIP’S SWITCHBOARD BY APPLYING SENSOR TECHNOLOGY

Nediljko Kaštelan, Marko Zubčić, Maja Krčum, Miro Petković

THE STAND FOR FIN DRIVES ENERGY TESTING

Andrzej Grządziela , Marcin Kluczyk , Tomislav Batur

INTRODUCTION OF 3D PRINTING INTO MARINE ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION – A CASE STUDY

Ivica Kuzmanić, Igor Vujović, Zlatan Kulenović, Miro Petković

SHIPYARD CRANE MODELING METHODS

Pawel Piskur , Piotr Szymak , Bartosz Larzewski

Книжка 6
A STUDY OF PARENTS' READINESS TO RAISE CHILDREN WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES

Dr. Maryana Buinyak, Assist. Prof. Prof. Dr. Svitlana Myronova

TEACHERS' PERSPECTIVE ON THE EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF ONLINE TEACHING

Dr. Julien-Ferencz Kiss, Prof. Dr. Florica Orțan, Dr. Laurențiu Mˆndrea

ПСИХОЛОГО-ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ ПРАВИЛА, МОДЕЛИ НА ДОБРИ ПРАКТИКИ И ПРЕПОРЪКИ ПРИ РАБОТАТА И ОБУЧЕНИЕТО НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ С ПОВЕДЕНЧЕСКИ РАЗСТРОЙСТВА

Тричков, Ив., 2019. Психолого-педагогически правила, модели на добри прак- тики и препоръки при работата и обучението на деца и ученици

Книжка 5
ФИДАНА ДАСКАЛОВА ЗА ПЕДАГОГИКАТА

Маргарита Колева, Йордан Колев

ВОЕННОМОРСКОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ – ЕДИН РАЗЛИЧЕН ПОГЛЕД

Кожухаров, А. (2021). Личните академични документи на българската военна образователна система (1892 – 1946). Варна: ВВМУ, ISBN 978-619-7428-55-1

Книжка 4
Книжка 3
НЕВРОДИДАКТИКА

Наталия Витанова

МОНТЕСОРИ МЕТОДЪТ И ПРИОБЩАВАЩАТА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНА СРЕДА

Балканска, Н. (2020). Монтесори методът и приобщаващата образователна среда. София: ИК „Феномен“, ISBN: 978- 954-549-144-3

ЗА АСИСТИРАЩИТЕ И ИНФОРМАЦИОННИТЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Сивакова, В. (2020). Асистиращи и информационни технологии

Книжка 2
ОВЛАДЯВАНЕ НА КЛЮЧОВИ КОМПЕТЕНЦИИ ПРИ ОРИЕНТИРАНЕ В СВЕТА

Стоянова, М. (2019). Овладяване на ключови компетенции при ориентиране в света. София: Авангард принт, ISBN 978-954-337-398-7 374

Книжка 1
BULGARIAN SCHOOL – SHOWCASE OF IDENTITY

Veska Gyuviyska, Nikolay Tsankov

ЗА ИЗБОРА НА УЧЕБЕН КОМПЛЕКТ ПО БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕЗИК И ЛИТЕРАТУРА В НАЧАЛЕН ЕТАП. И ЗА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО

Георгиева, А. (2020). Съвременни проекции на обучението по български език

КОНТРОЛ НА СТРЕСА. ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКИ И УПРАВЛЕНСКИ РАКУРСИ

Стоянов, В. (2020). Управление на стреса в организацията. Психологически и управленски ракурси. 198 cтр., Варна: Стено, ISBN 978-619-241-119-0

2020 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
EDUCATIONAL REASONS FOR EARLY SCHOOL DROP-OUT

Maria Teneva, Zlatka Zhelyazkova

ДИАГНОСТИКА НА БЪРНАУТ СИНДРОМ ПРИ ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИТЕ СПЕЦИАЛИСТИ – СТРАТЕГИИ ЗА СПРАВЯНЕ С ХРОНИЧНИЯ СТРЕС НА РАБОТНОТО МЯСТО

Янакиев, Ю. (2019). Диагностика на бърнаут синдром при педагогическите специалисти. Стратегии за справяне с хроничния стрес на работното

Книжка 7s
TEACHING CHALLENGES IN SPORTS EDUCATION DURING THE PANDEMIC COVID-19

Evelina Savcheva, Galina Domuschieva-Rogleva

THE DIFFERENCES IN STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES ABOUT ONLINE TEACHING DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Aleksić Veljković Aleksandra , Slađana Stanković , Irena Golubović-Ilić , Katarina Herodek

ONLINE EDUCATION DURING PANDEMIC, ACCORDING TO STUDENTS FROM TWO BULGARIAN UNIVERSITIES

Antoaneta Getova¹ , Eleonora Mileva² , Boryana Angelova-Igova²

Книжка 7
ПОДГОТОВКАТА НА ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ КАДРИ ЗА ПРЕДУЧИЛИЩНИТЕ ВЪЗПИТАТЕЛНИ ЗАВЕДЕНИЯ ПРЕЗ ПЕРИОДА 1944 – 1991 ГОДИНА

Въчева, С. (2019). Подготовката на педагогически кадри за предучилищните възпитателни заведения през периода

ПАЗАРНИ МЕХАНИЗМИ В УЧИЛИЩНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ. ТЕОРЕТИКО-ПРИЛОЖНИ ВЪПРОСИ

Първанова, Й. (2020) Пазарни механизми в училищното образование. Теоретико-приложни въпроси. София: Колбис, ISBN 978-619-7284-35-5

Книжка 6
TEACHERS ATTITUDES ABOUT INTEGRATED APPROACH IN TEACHING

Emina Kopas-Vukašinović, Aleksandra Mihajlović, Olivera Cekić-Jovanović

ЗА ДОСТЪПА ДО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НА ДЕЦА И УЧЕНИЦИ СЪС СПЕЦИАЛНИ ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИ ПОТРЕБНОСТИ

Янкова, Ж. (2019). Детерминанти в достъпа до образование на деца и

Книжка 5
КОНЦЕПТУАЛНИ МОДЕЛИ ЗА РАЗРАБОТВАНЕ НА ПОЗНАВАТЕЛНИ ОНЛАЙН ИГРИ В ОБЛАСТТА НА КУЛТУРНОТО НАСЛЕДСТВО

Детелин Лучев, Десислава Панева-Мариновa, Радослав Павлов Гита Сенка Лилия Павлова

ТАЛАНТЛИВ ПЕДАГОГ И КУЛТУРЕН ДЕЕЦ

Севда Чобанова, Любен Десев

Книжка 4
A CONTINUUM OF APPROACHES TO SCHOOL INSPECTIONS: CASES FROM EUROPE

Rossitsa Simeonova, Yonka Parvanova Martin Brown, Sarah Gardezi, Joe O’Hara, Gerry McNamara Laura del Castillo Blanco Zacharoula Kechri, Eleni Beniata

V. O. SUKHOMLYNSKY EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM AS А FORMING BASIS FOR PERSONALITY MORAL QUALITIES

(On the occasion of the 100th anniversary) Svitlana Surgova, Olena Faichuk

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
2019 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
Книжка 7
МОДЕЛ НА РАБОТА В ИНТЕРКУЛТУРНА СРЕДА

(Научноизследователска саморефлексия)

RISK FACTORS FOR EARLY SCHOOL LEAVING IN BULGARIA

Elena Lavrentsova, Petar Valkov

ПРИНОСИ НА ЕЛКА ПЕТРОВА ЗА БЪЛГАРСКОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

(100 години от рождението на проф. д.п.н. Елка Петрова – 27.10.1919 – 21.12.2012)

СВОЕОБРАЗЕН ВРЪХ В МЕТОДИКАТА НА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО ПО БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕЗИК В НАЧАЛНИТЕ КЛАСОВЕ

Христозова, Г. (2018). Обучението по български език в I – IV клас (граматика, правопис, правоговор, пунктуация). Габрово: ЕКС-ПРЕС

ИЗМЕРЕНИЯ НА КОНТРОЛНАТА ДЕЙНОСТ В ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Гьорева, Р. (2019). Контролната дейност в образованието. Благоевград: Макрос. ISBN 978-954-561-471-2

НАСОКИ ЗА ПРИОБЩАВАНЕ НА МАРГИНАЛНИ СЕМЕЙНИ ОБЩНОСТИ В ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛНИТЕ ИНСТИТУЦИИ

Нунев, Й. (2019). Насоки за приобщаване на маргинални семейни общности в образователните институции. Велико Търново: Св. св. Кирил и Методий, ISBN 978-619-208-186-7

Книжка 6
ДИОФАНТОВИ УРАВНЕНИЯ И СИСТЕМИ ДИОФАНТОВИ УРАВНЕНИЯ – ТЕОРЕТИЧНИ АСПЕКТИ И МЕТОДИЧЕСКА ПРОЕКЦИЯ В НАЧАЛНИЯ ЕТАП НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

Владимира Ангелова. (2018). Диофантови уравнения и системи диофантови уравнения – теоретични аспекти и методическа проекция в начален етап на образование. Пловдив: Паисий Хилендарски, ISBN 978-619-202-394-2

ЕДНА НОВА КНИГА ЗА ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИТЕ УМЕНИЯ НА УЧИТЕЛИТЕ

Николай Колишев. (2018). Теория на педагогическите умения на учителите. София: Захарий Стоянов, ISBN: 9789540912066

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА ИЗСЛЕДОВАТЕЛСКИЯ ПОДХОД ПРИ ОБУЧЕНИЕ НА СТУДЕНТИ ПЕДАГОЗИ

(върху примера на обучение по академичната дисциплина „Съвременни аспекти на гражданското образование“ на студенти педагози)

LEARNING MATURITY

Alina G“mbuță Daniela-Carmen Berințan Marijana Mikulandra Krzysztof Kij Katja Sivka

Книжка 2
ДЕТЕТО И ПЕДАГОГИКАТА

Рашева-Мерджанова, Ян., Петкова, Ил. & Господинов, Вл. (съст.). (2018). Детето и педагогиката. София: Просвета, ISBN 978-954-01-3806-0

Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ КОЛЕГИ,

Редакционната колегия на списание „Педаго- гика“ ви честити Новата 2019 година! Пожела- ваме ви от сърце тя да бъде щастлива, успешна и благословена! През отминалата юбилейна 2018 г. публику- вахме редица стойностни материали на универ- ситетски преподаватели, учители, разнородни специалисти, работещи в сферата на образова- нието, докторанти. Отбелязани бяха поредица от тематични конференции и юбилейни празни- ци. Получихме и международно признание чрез включването на списанието

УЧЕНИЧЕСКО САМОУПРАВЛЕНИЕ

Желязкова-Тея, Т. & Банчева, М. (2018). Ученическото самоуправление. София: Аз-буки. ISBN: 978-619-7065-20-6

2018 година
Книжка 9
ПРАВАТА НА ДЕТЕТО ПРЕЗ ПОГЛЕДА НА СТУДЕНТИ ПЕДАГОЗИ

Йорданка Николова, Даниела Рачева

Книжка 8
СПОДЕЛЕНО МНЕНИЕ

Николова, М. & Михалева, Б. (2018). С увереност срещу агресията и кон-

Книжка 7
РАДОСТТА ОТ ОБЩУВАНЕТО НА ЧУЖД ЕЗИК В ДЕТСТВОТО

Екатерина Софрониева, Христина Белева

НОВО ТЕОРЕТИКО-ПРАКТИЧЕСКО ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА ДЕТСКОТО ТВОРЧЕСТВО

Енгелс-Критидис, Р. (2018). Децата и творчеството. Юбилеен сборник в чест

ПРОФ. Д-Р ЕЛЕНА РУСИНОВА-БАХУДЕЙЛА

Розалина Енгелс-Критидис

Книжка 6
ПОЗИТИВНА УЧЕБНА СРЕДА

Валентина Шарланова

SENIOR CITIZENS’ EXISTENTIAL NEEDS AND EDUCATION FOR THE MEANING OF LIFE

Joanna Łukasik, Norbert Pikuła, Katarzyna Jagielska

Книжка 5
ПЛАНОМЕРНО ПСИХИЧЕСКО РАЗВИТИЕ

(По случай 115 г. от рождението на П.Я. Галперин)

ПАРАДИГМАТА СЕМИОТИКА – ЕЗИК – ДЕТЕ ПРИ 6 – 7-ГОДИШНИТЕ

Жоржетина Атанасова, Любимка Габрова

ПАРАРОДИТЕЛСКАТА ГРИЖА ВЪВ ФОКУСА НА ЕДИН СОЦИАЛНОПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ АНАЛИЗ

Ковачка, Ю. (2017). Социалнопедагогически проблеми при деца с парародителска грижа. Благоевград: УИ „Неофит Рилски“, 144 стр. ISBN: 9789540001340

Книжка 4
ДЕТСКИ КОНФЕРЕНЦИИ

Боряна Иванова

СТЕРЕОТИПИЗАЦИЯ НА ЕТНИЧЕСКИТЕ ВЗАИМООТНОШЕНИЯ ПРИ СЪВРЕМЕННИТЕ МЛАДИ БЪЛГАРИ

Зорница Ганева. (2017). Стереотипизация на етническите взаимоотношения при съвременните млади българи. София: Елестра. ISBN 978-619-7292-03-9

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
СЪВРЕМЕННИ МЕТАМОРФОЗИ НА ВЗАИМООТНОШЕНИЯТА В ДЕТСКАТА ГРУПА

Веселина Иванова, Виолета Кърцелянска-Станчева

SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES AS SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS

Emilj Sulejmani Shikjerije Sulejmani

ОТНОСНО УСЕТА ЗА БРОЕНЕ

Петър Петров, Мима Трифонова

НАСИЛИЕТО НЕ РЕШАВА КОНФЛИКТИ

Дронзина, Т., Михалева, Б. (2017). Защо медиация? София: Сиела. ISBN 978-954-28-2482-4

Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ КОЛЕГИ И ПРИЯТЕЛИ,

Редакционната колегия на сп.„Педагогика“ Ви честити Новата 2018 г. Пожелаваме ви тя да бъде здрава, щедра и благословена! Тази година списанието чества своя юбилей – 90 години от неговото публикуване за първи път през 1928 г. с името „Народна просвета“. От деня на създаване до сега, то отразява актуал- ните проблеми на педагогическата наука и прак- тика и остава верен спътник на хиляди научни работници, учители, докторанти. Вярваме, че силата на творческата ни енергия ще пом

ДОБРИ ПРАКТИКИ „ПАРТНЬОРСТВО РОДИТЕЛИ – УЧИЛИЩЕ“

Мехмед Имамов, Калинка Гайтанинчева

2017 година
Книжка 9
ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКОТО УЧЕНИЕ НА Й. ФР. ХЕРБАРТ – ИСТОРИЯ И СЪВРЕМЕННОСТ

(По повод 240 г. от неговото рождение) Невена Филипова

Книжка 8
ЧЕТЯЩИЯТ СТУДЕНТ, ЧЕТЯЩОТО ДЕТЕ – ЕДНО МАЛКО ПРОЗОРЧЕ, ЕДНА ВЕЛИЧЕСТВЕНА ГЛЕДКА

Мариана Мандева, Боряна Туцева, Габриела Николова, Цветелина Ковачева

Книжка 7
ДИДАКТИЧЕСКИ КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТИ

Нели Митева, Наталия Витанова

Книжка 6
Книжка 5
ИЗСЛЕДОВАТЕЛСКО ОБУЧЕНИЕ В АКАДЕМИЧНА СРЕДА

(Научно-теоретична рефлексия) Румяна Неминска

ПРИНОС В ПСИХОЛОГИЯТА НА ТВОРЧЕСТВОТО

(120 години от рождението на Лев Семьонович Виготски) Любен Десев

ЛЕВ СEМЬОНОВИЧ ВИГОТСКИ – ПСИХОЛОГ И НА ХХI ВЕК

(по случай 120 години от рождението му)

ИСКУССТВО В ЖИЗНИ ЛЮДЕЙ

Гульнар Омарова

НОВА И ПОЛЕЗНА КНИГА

Йонка Първанова

ПРИНОСЕН ТРУД КЪМ МЕТОДИКАТА НА ОБУЧЕНИЕТО ПО БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕЗИК И ЛИТЕРАТУРА В НАЧАЛНОТО УЧИЛИЩЕ

М. Мандева (2017). Методика на обучението по български език и литература – I – IV клас. Начално ограмотяване. В. Търново: УИ „Св. св. Кирил и Методий“, 120 стр.

ЕДНО ФУНДАМЕНТАЛНО ИНТЕГРАЛНО ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ НА РОЛЯТА НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО ЗА РАЗВИТИЕТО НА НООСФЕРНИЯ ИНТЕЛЕКТ

Марга Георгиева, Сава Гроздев. (2016). Морфодинамиката за развитието на ноосферния интелект. София: Изток-Запад, ISBN 978-619-152-869-1

Книжка 4
Книжка 3
СИСТЕМАТИЧНО ВЪВЕДЕНИЕ В ОБЩАТА И ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКАТА СИНЕРГЕТИКА

Любен Десев (2015). Синергетика. Въведение и речник. 777 термина. София: ИК „Екопрогрес“. 464 с. ISBN 978-954-2970-37-8

Книжка 2
ПРОБЛЕМИ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВИ В РАЗВИТИЕТО НА ХУДОЖЕСТВЕНОТО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ У НАС ПРЕЗ ПОГЛЕДА НА ДЕТСКИЯ И НАЧАЛНИЯ УЧИТЕЛ

Теодора Власева, Даниела Гирджева-Валачева, Мария Калоферова, Найден Младенов, Илияна Шотлекова

ЗАКЪСНЯЛО ПРИЗНАНИЕ

Доц. д-р Емилия Николова

Книжка 1
ФАКТОРИ ЗА УСПЕШНО ПРИЛАГАНЕ НА СМЕСЕНО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова Лъчезар Лазаров

ЗА СТОПЛЕНИТЕ ПЪТЕКИ КЪМ ЛИТЕРАТУРНОТО ПОЗНАНИЕ

Радев, Радослав. 2015. Технология на методите в обучението по литература. Варна: Славена, 247 с., ISBN 978-619-190-041-1

2016 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
АНТРОПОЛОГИЯ НА ВЪЗПИТАНИЕТО

Кристоф Вулф. (2016). Антропология на възпитанието. София: издателство „Изток-Запад“

ВЕРСИИТЕ В БИОГРАФИИТЕ НА ЛИЧНОСТТА

Другите в биографията на личността (2015), под общата редакция

Книжка 7
IBM SPSS STATISTICS ПРЕЗ ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИЯ ПОГЛЕД НА ДОЦ. Д-Р ЗОРНИЦА ГАНЕВА

Зорница Ганева (2016). Да преоткрием статистиката с IBM SPSS Statistics. София: Елестра. 712 стр. ISBN 978-619-7292-01-5

НАЧАЛНОТО ОГРАМОТЯВАНЕ – „КЛЮЧ“ ЗА УСПЕШЕН ЖИВОТ В ПРОМЕНЯЩИЯ СЕ СВЯТ

Мариана Мандева, Диляна Гаджева (2016). Начално ограмотяване

ОТ „ЧУДНА И ДИВНА ДАСКАЛЕТИНКА“ ДО ПЕДАГОГИКА ЗА НАЦИОНАЛНО СЛУЧВАНЕ

Виолета Атанасова (2015) Петко Славейков за образованието. Шумен: Унивeрситетско издателство „Епископ Константин Преславски. 208 с. ISBN 978-619-201-051-5

Книжка 6
УЧИЛИЩЕ ЗА ЧЕТЕНЕ

Петя Георгиева Христина Димитрова

ПРАВО В ДЕСЕТКАТА

Ако обичате да правите викторини с интересни езикови въпро- си или да печелите басове, с този прост въпрос можете да ударите право в десетката. Как е правилно: деветка или девятка, десетка или десятка? Въпросът е идеален за басове, защото поне половината българи употребяват грешните форми девятка и десятка (по резултати от търсене в Гугъл), а друга част погрешно смятат, че двойките думи са дублети. Объркването произтича от грешна аналогия с явлението променливо я, което е наследник на ста

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
СИНЕРГЕТИКА – НОВО НАУЧНО ПОЗНАНИЕ

(Синергетика – въведение и речник, София: ИК Екопрогрес, 2015 г.)

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
НОВА ДИНАМИЧНА МОДИФИКАЦИЯ В ГРАНИЦИТЕ НА „АЗ-КОНЦЕПЦИЯТА“ НА МАТЕМАТИЧЕСКОТО МОДЕЛИРАНЕ

Марга Георгиева & Сава Гроздев. (2015). Морфодинамиката за развитието на ноосферния интелект, София: Марга Георгиева. 323 стр. ISBN 9786199052204

Книжка 1
IN MEMORIAM

На 10.12.2015 г. ни напусна нашият колега и приятел проф. д-р Иван Пет ков Иванов. Той беше уважаван учен и експерт в областта на педагогическите науки – автор на 10 монографии, 8 учебника, 10 учебни помагала, 6 студии и над 100 статии в специализирани периодич- ни издания и научни сборници; участник в 28 между- народни и национални проекта; председател и член на експертни групи към НАОА, член на редакционната ко- легия на сп. „Педагогика“. Проф. д-р Иван Иванов беше уважаван и оби

2015 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
РУСЕНСКИЯТ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ

Златоживка Здравкова

Книжка 7
ДИСКУСИЯТА В УРОКА ПО ЛИТЕРАТУРА

Огняна Георгиева-Тенева

Книжка 6
УЧИТЕЛЯТ ПРАВИ УЧИЛИЩЕТО

ЕЗИКОВАТА ГРАМОТНОСТ НА МАЛКИЯ УЧЕНИК – „КЛЮЧ“ ЗА ОТГОВОРЕН И УСПЕШЕН ЖИВОТ В ПРОМЕНЯЩИЯ СЕ СВЯТ

ГОТОВНОСТ ЗА ОГРАМОТЯВАНЕ

Екатерина Чернева

Книжка 5
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЕ МЕЖДУ ИСТОРИЯ, АКАДЕМИЗЪМ И РЕАЛНИ ПРАКТИКИ В СОЦИАЛНОПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКАТА ДЕЙНОСТ

Академични полета на социалната педагогика, съставител: проф. д.п.н. Клавдия Сапунджиева, научна редакция: проф. дпн Клавдия Сапунджиева, проф. д-р Нели Бояджиева, гл. ас. д-р Марина Пиронкова,

НОВА КНИГА

Клавдия Сапунджиева

Книжка 1
ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: THEORY AND REALITY

Inna Leonidovna Fedotenko

ОТЗИВ ЗА КНИГАТА „ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЕН ДИЗАЙН (КОНЦЕПТУАЛНИ ОСНОВАНИЯ И ПРАКТИЧЕСКИ РЕШЕНИЯ)“

Димова, Д. (2013). Образователен дизайн (концептуални основания

2014 година
Книжка 9
Книжка 8
Книжка 7
ЗАЕДНО МОЖЕМ ПОВЕЧЕ

Диана Смиленова

Книжка 6
УСПЕШНИЯТ УЧИТЕЛ – МЕЖДУ ПРОФЕСИОНАЛНАТА НОРМА И СТРАСТТА ДА ПРЕПОДАВАШ

Проф. д-р Ангел Петров е преподавател по методика на обучението по български език в СУ „Св. Климент Охридски“. Ръководител е на най- старата катедра по методика на филологически- те дисциплини в страната – Катедрата по ме-

Книжка 5
ВЪЗГЛЕДИТЕ НА ЖАН-ЖАК РУСО И ЛЮБЕН КАРАВЕЛОВ ЗА ВЪЗПИТАНИЕТО

Посвещава се на 180-ата годишнина от рождението на Любен Каравелов (1834 – 1879) Виолета Атанасова

LE PROJET PÉDAGOGIQUE, SOURCE DE MOTIVATION DANS L’ENSEIGNEMENT ET L’APPRENTISSAGE DU FLE

THE EDUCATIONAL PROJECT, MEANS OF MOTIVATION IN TEACHING AND LEARNING FLE

LA PÉDAGOGIE DU PROJET ET LA MOTIVATION DES ÉLÈVES POUR L’APPRENTISSAGE DU FRANÇAIS

PROJECT PEDAGOGY AND PUPILS’ MOTIVATION IN LEARNING FRENCH

Книжка 4
е от непосредствената област на науките философия, социология и епистемо- логия. Втората трактовка по същество се отнася до моделирането в соци- ална среда като средство за прилагане на познанието за закономерностите на обществата, групите и индивидите. Понятието модел при втората трактовка и разликата между него и методите е, че моделът има по-цялостно приложе- ние, включвайки в себе си методите,

Социална парадигма Социални методи Социален модел (с приложна функция)

ТРИНАДЕСЕТИ МЕЖДУНАРОДНИ ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ ЧЕТЕНИЯ

МАРТ, 2014 ГОДИНА, ТБИЛИСИ, ГРУЗИЯ

КАЖДЫЙ ДЛЯ МЕНЯ УЧИТЕЛЬ

Ш.А.Амонашвили

Книжка 3
АНТОАНЕТА ЙОВЧЕВА (1952 – 2014)

След трудна борба с тежката болест ни напусна един добър и мил човек, една светла личност – Анто- анета Йовчева, нашата обичана колежка Тони. Нейните колеги и приятели, многобройните автори и сътрудници на сп. „Начално образование“ и на сп. „Педагогика“ ще запазят завинаги спомена за нейната приветлива усмивка, за нейната отзивчивост и преда- ност към работата, за нейната широка култура и стре- меж към познание, към развитие. Родена на 20 март 1952 г. в София в интелигентно се- мей

Книжка 2
ПОСТМОДЕРНИЗЪМ И ВЪЗПИТАНИЕ

Клавдия Сапунджиева

ДЕТСКИ УНИВЕРСИТЕТИ

Боряна Иванова

ПРОФ. Д-Р ЕЛКА ПЕТРОВА

Има личности, в сиянието на които се оглеж- дат цяла плеада последователи, възпитаници, колеги; има личности, без които животът става по беден, дните по-еднообразни, защото в сър- цето остава празно място. Такава личност е професор, доктор на педа- гогическите науки Елка Петрова – най–големият ерудит в областта на предучилищното възпита - ние, учен с международно значение. Дълги години ще свеждаме глави пред нейна- та обаятелна личност, с искрена признателност ще си спомняме свидните

МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЙ ЦЕНТР ГУМАННОЙ ПЕДАГОГИКИ

Международният център „Хуманна педагогика“ организира XIII педаго- гически четения в периода 20 – 23.03.2014 г. в гр.Тбилиси, Грузия. Форумът се организира със съдействието на грузинското правителство. „Учителят“ е темата, която ще обедини участниците: учители, експерти, родители, универ- ситетски преподаватели, представители на педагогическата общност от мно- го страни, за да се осъществи дискусия за мисията на съвременния учител в съвременния образователен контекст. Ръководството на

Книжка 1
ОСНОВНИ ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКИ НА МОБИЛНОТО ОБУЧЕНИЕ

Стоянка Георгиева-Лазарова Лъчезар Лазаров

2013 година
Книжка 9
УЧИТЕЛИ ВЪЗРОЖДЕНЦИ В ТЪРНОВО

Венка Кутева-Цветкова

Книжка 8
ДИМИТЪР ДОНЧЕВ – С ВЪЗХИТА ЗА БЪЛГАРСКИЯ УЧИТЕЛ

100 ГОДИНИ ОТ РОЖДЕНИЕТО НА ДИМИТЪР ЕВСТАТИЕВ ДОНЧЕВ (5.10.1913 – 15.02.1997)

Книжка 7
„СЛЪНЦЕТО“ НА ВЪЗПИТАТЕЛНАТА СИСТЕМА В ТВУ – РАКИТОВО

85 ГОДИНИ ОТ РОЖДЕНИЕТО НА АНГЕЛ УЗУНОВ (1928 – 1999)

ЦЕННОСТИ И ДУХОВНО-НРАВСТВЕНО РАЗВИТИЕ НА МАЛКИЯ УЧЕНИК

Марияна Ешкенази, Гергана Фиданова, Марияна Вишева, Цветанка Годжилова

МАЛКИЯТ УЧЕНИК ЧЕТЕ

Марияна Механджиева Венета Велева

С БАБА И ДЯДО В КЛАС

Цветелин Горанов, Таня Илиева, Цветанка Берова, Нели Иванова, Борка Бончева

РОД РОДА НЕ ХРАНИ, НО ТЕЖКО МУ, КОЙТО ГО НЯМА!

Диляна Вачкова Евелина Димитрова

ДА ПОМОГНЕМ НА ДЕЦАТА ДА ОТВОРЯТ СЪРЦАТА СИ

Иванка Дебелушина Нина Маврикова

ДОБРОТО Е У ВСЕКИ

Мария Наскова

ОТЛИЧЕН ПЕДАГОГ, ПСИХОЛОГ И ПСИХОТЕРАПЕВТ

ДОЦ. СВЕТОСЛАВ СТАМЕНОВ (1939 – 2013)

Книжка 6
ТЕОРЕТИКО-ПРИЛОЖНИ ПРОБЛЕМИ НА КОНСТРУИРАНЕТО НА ТЕСТ ЗА НАЦИОНАЛНО ВЪНШНО ОЦЕНЯВАНЕ ПО „ЧОВЕКЪТ И ОБЩЕСТВОТО“ ЗА 4. КЛАС (2013)

Ваня Петрова, Цонка Каснакова, Мариан Делчев Жана Минчева Радостина Стоянова, Рада Димитрова Мария Темникова

MEDIA IN PRESCHOOL AGE OF CHILD’S LIFE

Sonja Petrovska Jadranka Bocvarova

Книжка 5
ШАЛВА АЛЕКСАНДРОВИЧ АМОНАШВИЛИ – УЧИТЕЛ ОТ БЪДЕЩЕТО

В сложното битие на науката и метамор- фозите на социалната реалност, неотменими и общовалидни остават само най-стойностни- те постижения и безспорни истини, които не само маркират и остойностяват територията на човешко познание, но извисяват самия чо- век, поддържат неговата вяра в доброто, под- хранват чувството му за собствена значимост, укрепват неговия дух. Приемайки извечните послания на класи- ческата философско-педагогическа мъдрост и дълбоко обвързан с педагогическата р

МАНИФЕСТ ГУМАННОЙ ПЕДАГОГИКИ

Преамбула 25 лет тому назад группа учителей новаторов провозгласила манифест „Пе- дагогика сотрудничества“ (Переделкино, 1986 год). В последующие годы были опубликованы отчеты встреч учителей новаторов, в которых рассматри- вались разные аспекты педагогики сотрудничества: „Демократизация лично- сти“ (Цинандали, Телавский район, Грузия, 1987 год), „Методика обновления“ (Москва, 1988 год), „Войдем в новую школу“ (Краснодарский край, 1988 год). Идеи педагогики сотрудничества воодушевленно

ПОРТФОЛИОТО НА УЧЕНИКА КАТО ПРОЦЕС НА САМОПОЗНАНИЕ

Радка Топалска Емилия Вълкова, Албена Атанасова

ДОПИРНИ СВЕТОВЕ

Албена Димитрова Стилияна Гронева

ПРЕДИ ГОДИНА И СЕГА

Веселка Аршинкова

Книжка 4
СВЕЩЕНИК ГЕОРГИ МАРИНОВ ПОЛУГАНОВ – ОСНОВАТЕЛЯТ НА УЧИЛИЩЕТО И ПЪРВИЯТ УЧИТЕЛ В ПОЛИКРАЙЩЕ

Георги Георгиев Трифонка Попниколова Марияна Георгиева–Гроссе

ЕВРОПЕЙСКИ ПРИКАЗКИ

Светла Попова

Книжка 3
ПОЗДРАВИТЕЛЕН АДРЕС

Има събития и дати, които не се забравят, които оставaт в душите на- веки. Такъв е бил и денят преди 40 го- дини – 15 април 1973 год., когато ОДЗ 7 „Детелина“ отваря врати и екипът поема тежката, но благородна задача да изпълни със светлина умовете и сърцата на децата. 40 години е достойна възраст за един човешки живот, за една инсти- туция като ОДЗ 7 „Детелина“. В този празничен ден имаме възможност със самочувствие да проследим пътя на утвърждаването н

ДА ОПАЗИМ ДЕТСКОТО ЗДРАВЕ!

Мая Топалова, Симона Пейчева

КАК ДА ОТГЛЕДАМЕ МАЛЪК ПРИРОДОЛЮБИТЕЛ?

Мадлена Николова Ани Цветкова

Книжка 2
Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ КОЛЕГИ, ПРИЯТЕЛИ И СЪМИШЛЕНИЦИ,

Редколегията на списание „Педагогика“ честити на всички Новата 2013 година и пожелава тя бъде щастлива, плодотворна, изпълнена с творчески пориви и нови изследователски проникновения!

ИЗКУСТВОТО ЗА ПРЕВЕНЦИЯ НА АГРЕСИВНОТО ПОВЕДЕНИЕ НА ДЕЦАТА

Евгения Миланова Виолета Николова Величка Радева

ПРИЯТЕЛСТВОТО В ЖИВОТА НА ДЕТЕТО

Даниела Димитрова Красимира Василева

ПРЕДАЙ НАТАТЪК

Вилдан Мехмедова

ЗАЕДНО ДА БЪДЕМ ДОБРИ

(ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКА СИТУАЦИЯ В ПОДГОТВИТЕЛНА ГРУПА)

ПРОФ. ДПН EЛКА ПЕТРОВА EДНА НЕЗАЛИЧИМА СЛЕДА В БЪЛГАРСКОТО ПРЕДУЧИЛИЩНО ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ (1919 – 2012)

Почина проф. дпн Елка Петрова (20.ХІІ.2012 г.) – на- шата любима учителка по изкуството да се живее пъл- ноценно и професионално, създателката на науката за предучилищното възпитание на българските деца, пре- красната жена и велика майка, Неповторима, единствена, съвършена – това е нашата Елка: Примерът за всички нас – хилядите нейни студенти и последователи ! Елка Петрова винаги е първа, винаги е оригинална и авангардна; през 1950–1952 г. поставя началото на Висшия мето

2012 година
Книжка 9
ПЕДАГОГЪТ – РИЦАР НА ДЕТСТВОТО

Януш Корчак бе написал, че животът на великите хора е като легендите: труден, но красив. И се оказва пророчески прав, сякаш е писал за себе си! Наследник на семейство с богата духовна култура и традиции, останал отрано без баща, той не просто се справя с несгодите на сирачеството, но развива у себе си три могъщи извора на живот: любов към свободата и справедливостта, страст към знанието и творчеството, отдаденост на децата и тяхното щастие. Лекарят Корчак лекува децата и душите им. Безплатн

ЯНУШ КОРЧАК – ВЕЛИК ХУМАНИСТ И ПЕДАГОГ

„Със сила и мощ поведох своя живот, който беше привидно неподреден, самотен и чужд. За син избрах идеята да служа на детето и неговото дело. Привидно загубих.“ Бе лекар, писател, мислител. Бе философ, учен, моралист. Издател. Възпи- тател и педагог. Бе герой. Бе скромен. Във всяка от тези области той има изключителни постижения. В течение на по- вече от четиридесет години работи като педагог и писател. Четиридесет години безкористно служене на слабите и беззащитните. Създава съвременна кон

ЕВОЛЮЦИЯ НА ПРАВАТА НА ДЕТЕТО

„Детето има право на сериозно отношение към проблемите му, на справедливото им решаване.“

THE KORCZAK’S RIGHT TO SOCIAL PARTICIPATION OF CHILDREN THE CITIZENSHIP OF CHILDREN

A speech by Marek Michalak, the Ombudsman for Children, given during the seminar„The Polish-Israeli pioneer in the fi eld of human rights, Janusz Korczak (1879–1942) and today’s Convention on Children’s Rights as the part of the international law“, Geneva, the 6 of June 2009

ЗА ДЕТЕТО, ДЕТСТВОТО ИЛИ НАУКА ЗА НЕГО?

В памет на Януш Корчак – по повод 70 г. от неговата смърт и 100 г. от създаването на „Дом за сираци“ във Варшава Албена Чавдарова

Книжка 8
CHANGES IN UNIVERSITY TEACHING – THE ROAD FROM KNOWLEDGE TO COMPETENCIES

Slađana Anđelković Zorica Stanisavljević Petrović

ДОСТОЕН ЖИВОТ, ОТДАДЕН НА ПРОСВЕЩЕНИЕТО… ПРОФ. СТОЙКА ЗДРАВКОВА – ЕДИН СЪВРЕМЕНЕН БУДИТЕЛ НА 70 ГОДИНИ

Неуморна и взискателна! Енергична и всеотдай- на! Работохолик и перфекционист! Това е проф. д-р Стойка Здравкова! Не е за вярване, че в началото на ноември 2012 година навърши 70 години. И не е слу- чайно това, че тази светла дата е непосредствено бли- зо до Деня на будителите. А това, че проф . Здравкова е съвременен български будител, е толкова безспорно и видимо! 70–годишнината ù е един чудесен повод ретрос- пективно да си припомним и проследим най-значи-

Книжка 7
ОЧАКВАНА И ПОЛЕЗНА

Емилия Василева

Книжка 6

Книжка 5
ЦЕННО ПОМАГАЛО ЗА ПСИХОЛОЗИ И ПЕДАГОЗИ (Надежден инструмент за диагностициране смисъла на живота)

Любен Десев Минчев, Борис. Тест на Дж. Крумбъг и Л. Махолик за смисъл в живота. Българска версия. Варна, ВСУ „Черноризец Храбър“,

ГЕОРГИ MАВРОВ ЖИВОТ, ОТДАДЕН НА НАУКАТА И ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Така най-общо, но и най-точно можем да охарак- теризираме дейността на ст. н. с. д-р Георги Петков Мавров. Той ни напусна неочаквано в края на април т.г. И до последния си ден не преставаше да се вълнува от проблемите на образованието. Споделяше инте- ресни мисли относно предстоящото приемане на За- кона за образованието. Пестелив на думи, но щедър на дела – това ясно проличава от неговата богата би- ография.

Книжка 4
ОЩЕ ЕДНА ИДЕЯ

Галина Стоянова

Книжка 3
С ИНОВАТИВЕН ПОГЛЕД КЪМ ЛИЧНОСТТА НА ДЕТЕТО

Маргарита Абрашева Любимка Габрова

БИЗНЕС ОБУЧЕНИЕ В ДЕТСКАТА ГРАДИНА

Красимира Костова Петя Драгоданова

ДЕТСКАТА БЕЗОПАСНОСТ

Любимка Габрова

БАБА ПРИКАЗКИ РАЗКАЗВА... (МИКС ОТ ПРИКАЗКИ)

Кева Захариева, Мария Мичева

Книжка 2
ДЕТЕ ПЪТУВА В АВТОМОБИЛА

Красимира Михайлова

ПРОТИВОПОСТАВЯНЕ

Пюрвя Ердниев Б. Ердниев „Нашата обща категория противопоставяне е едно от основните и необходими общи понятия, което улеснява регулирането и дори прави възможно, заедно с другите общи понятия, нашето здравомислие.“ И. П. Павлов Учителите от нашата страна познават смисъла на иновацията УДЕ (уголе- мяване на дидактичните единици). Ключ за решаване на конкретни въпроси на УДЕ се оказва чудесната дума- закон „противопоставяне“, употребена от академик Павлов за обясняване на

ЗДРАВКА НОВАКОВА – ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛ И ТВОРЕЦ

Седемдесетгодишният юбилей е вълнуващ повод да проследим трудния, богат и съдържателен професионално-творчески път на доц. д-р Здравка Новакова, да под- чертаем нейната важна роля за утвърждаване на дидактика на математиката като

IN MEMORIAM Иван Марев

Напусна ни проф. Иван Марев – философ, педагог, демократ, родолюбец. В далечната 1975 г., зареден с енергия, пълен с идеи, той създаде в Техническия

Книжка 1
ДЕЛЕГИРАНЕ НА ПРАВА ЧРЕЗ КОМИСИИТЕ В ДЕТСКАТА ГРАДИНА

Маргарита Абрашева Политиката, наречена управление на качеството, не е самоцел, нито поредна обра- зователна „мода“. Тя е практически необходима за поддържане от директора на учеб- ното заведение на един привлекателен образ в условията на конкуренция на пазара на учебни заведения. Това се отнася най-вече за детските градини. Политиката на упра- вление на качеството съдържа недостатъчно използван ресурс, включително за спечел- ване и запазване доверието на потребителя – родителите на децата,

ИНОВАЦИОННИ И ИНТЕРАКТИВНИ МЕТОДИ В КВАЛИФИКАЦИОННАТА ДЕЙНОСТ НА ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИЯ КОЛЕКТИВ

Стоилка Ташева, Севда Лукайчева Развиващото се с динамични темпове общество в днешно време налага необ- ходимостта от иновационни промени в областта на образованието. И в предучи- лищната педагогика все по-често се търсят алтернативни педагогически техноло- гии както за възпитанието и обучението на децата, така и при провеждането на квалификационната дейност на самите педагози. Използването на интерактивните методи дава възможност да се възлагат за- дачи, които предполагат съвместна работа,

ТОВА ТРЯБВА ДА ГО ЗНАЕ ВСЯКО ДЕТЕ

Татяна Атанасова, Иванка Пампова

НА УЛИЦАТА Е ОПАСНО

Таня Янчева, Зоя Кацарова