Философия
Вход / Регистрация

2025/1, стр. 128 - 134

MANCHEV, BOYAN. WORLD AND FREEDOM: TRANSCENDENTAL PHILOSOPHY AND MODAL ONTOLOGY. SOFIA: NEW BULGARIAN UNIVERSITY PUBLISHING, 2023, 719 PAGES.

Резюме:

Ключови думи:

The book intertwines two main interpretative lines. On the one hand, it offers an immanent, textually attentive reconstructive reading of Kant, encompassing practically his entire corpus. On the other hand, Kant is critically reexamined

and productively transcended. In this critical rethinking of Kant, Nietzsche and the late Nietzschean tradition are powerfully engaged: most notably Deleuze, but also the radicalized critique of the past 150 years has become a resource for Manchev’s specific transformative hermeneutics.

What are the goals? In short, the book brackets Kant’s epistemological stakes to open up the problematics of freedom. Through freedom, Kant’s epistemology is to be transformed into a modal ontology. This is the book’s central task: to liberate Kant from his self-imposed epistemological rigidity, enabling him to operate within the ontological field as a “Nietzschean” or “Bataillean” figure.

However, this task is by no means carried out arbitrarily. I will attempt to demonstrate this briefly, in a bold effort to take a bird’s-eye view of Manchev’s work on Kant.

Kant’s own method from the Critique of Pure Reason – the so-called regressive synthesis – is a method of seeking the conditions of possibility for any given conditioned phenomenon. Since the regressive synthesis always proceeds in three directions – it searches for the conditions of multiplicity, unity, and anity in experience – it correspondingly postulates three regulative ideas: things-inthemselves, the soul (apperception), and God.

Manchev closely follows this regressive synthesis step by step, but gradually overturns what Kant tries to uphold as regulative principles, transforming them into constitutive principles. I would call what Manchev does a productive synthesis. However, it is not “progressive,” because progressive is a Kantian term, used didactically – to describe how, once you grasp the conditions of possibility of experience, you can teach them, demonstrate them to others. Aproductive synthesis, on the other hand, reconstructs a given structure from the moment of its production – from its constitutive moment.

In fact, Manchev assumes that even the most rigorously constructed epistemological world of the Newtonian-Galilean type, which Kant seeks to build, is ultimately produced freely. That is, even the strictest deterministic framework of science is created thanks to forces that are undetermined. Every framework of necessity is created through freedom, which turns out to be the ultimate condition of our experience – its constitutive moment.

Kant’s epistemology relies on the predefined correlation between the impossible, the necessary, and the possible. We examine a phenomenon and observe – it could be one way, it could be another, but there are certain things without which it cannot be known. What is it without which this phenomenon cannot be known? Kant answers that no phenomenon can be known without space and time, without the categories of unity, plurality, totality, and so on.

A phenomenon cannot be known without these; therefore, it is necessary for every phenomenon to be given in space and time and to be synthesized under the categories of unity, plurality, and so forth. Kant equates “cannot” with “it is necessary to”, treating them as synonyms or tautology. Manchev deconstructs this tautology by demonstrating that it conceals an illegitimate leap.

What does Manchev do? It seems as though he is saying: Kant’s “it cannot be otherwise” is not automatically equivalent to necessity. Instead, this “it cannot be otherwise” is closer to “it must not be otherwise” in the sense of “I/we do not wish it to be otherwise.” This “it cannot be otherwise” is, so to speak, stripped from Kant’s quasi-objectivist interpretation and shifts into the domain of free will, of free desire or intention. Manchev changes the stakes of “cannot be” – he himself uses the term “vise” – giving it an inclination, a direction.

From this point, what is necessary is no longer a flat or total necessity; it suddenly turns out to be a projection, a product of freedom. Necessity becomes the focus of desire or – avoiding anthropomorphism, as Manchev himself urges – necessity is the target point of a drive or striving.

This is precisely what Kant seems to forget – what he skips over.

The insertion of desire between possibility and necessity, the formation of the triad can – want – must, is grounded in the Ideogenesis of Krasimir Manchev, Boyan’s father. Ideogenesis is a linguistic paradigm in the tradition of Gustave Guillaume, based on the study of the functioning of the French verb (see pp. 567569, as well as Appendix 2). Krasimir Manchev demonstrates that there is a logic to the unfolding of the verb and its forms: there is a genesis through the semantic development of modal verbs.

The genesis of modalities begins with “to be,” and after “to be” come the others – the first is “can,” the second is “want,” and the third is “must.” Each of them includes and semantically builds upon the previous ones. Thus, “want” includes and builds upon “can,” and “must” includes and builds upon “want.” Must turns out to be a specific kind of maximization of desire, its semantic amplification, or, metaphorically speaking, its intensification.

In Krasimir Manchev’s framework, “want” functions as a kind of transmitter or differential that shifts from “can” to “must.” Boyan Manchev performs the same modal transformation in relation to Kant: he transforms “possibility” and “impossibility” by investing them with “desire” and “freedom.” In doing so, the status of necessity changes—necessity becomes a “desired possibility,” a “possibility inclined toward its necessary realization.”

Let us demonstrate this through Kant! At first glance, it seems strictly necessary, given that the regressive synthesis proceeds in three directions, to ultimately posit three regulative principles: “things-in-themselves,” “the soul,” and “God.” However, this strict necessity quickly collapses if we ask, for example: Why specifically “God” as the regulative principle of anity? Why not “Mother Goddess,” “Tree of Life,” “dark matter,” “dark energy,” or anything else you can think of?

Despite Kant’s self-imposed formalism, such questions reveal that a certain content has slipped into his system – a representation, in this case, the image of “God” – a content that is, in fact, logically arbitrary. Thus, Kant’s system also turns out to be logically arbitrary. Boyan Manchev, however, shows that while Kant’s system is logically arbitrary, it is existentially necessary.

The inclination of Kant’s thought, his vise, was such that he saw “God” as the principle of anity. Yet, in a different situation, there could have been a different inclination, a different desire, a different vise. Different possible worlds arise in different situations: with another inclination of existence – what Manchev calls a clinamen – existence could have taken a different turn and produced a different world.

Thus, Kant’s “God” is not merely a logically arbitrary assumption; it is the result of a convergence of circumstances that gave rise to this possibility, which, inclined by desire, instantly transformed into necessity. But a necessity only there, in that place, in that instance: a necessity that emerged freely. A necessity with a changed status!

I once wrote that the status of necessity must be changed: necessity is always freely armed. Boyan Manchev, however, makes a move that amplifies this thesis even further. While I insisted that every framework, every matrix that structures our experience must be freely armed and re-armed in order to function, Manchev’s interpretation grants freedom even greater power. Freedom begins to bend the matrix, the boundaries of experience, and transitions into autopoiesis – hence Manchev’s project for philosophical science fiction.

Thus, from Kant’s motif of “it is not possible not to,” we gradually arrive at “there are no impossible things.” In philosophical science fiction, there are no impossible things because the argument “it is not possible not to” is reshaped through “I want.” Possibility is inclined by aspiration, by an energetic investment, through pressure, until it becomes “must”. When possibility is tilted in a certain direction, it begins to weigh that way, gradually becoming quasi-necessary.

This is why it is philosophical science fiction: because when there are no impossible things, the question of what is possible to happen – or, more simply, what will happen? – becomes an entirely open question. But although the world is open, not everything is equally possible – this is not about formal relativism. What will happen depends on when and where freedom is invested—on what inclination of the possible, and thus what necessity, will be given to the world.

In fact, Manchev accomplishes a paradigmatic turn in the understanding of classical modal categories – he overturns them. This turn – this revolution – is the second after the “Copernican revolution” of Hume and Kant. Manchev executes a revolution of the revolution—he turns Kant’s turn inside out.

I believe that Kant’s Copernican revolution is not so much in the shift of perspective and the privileging of the knowing subject, as is the classical understanding. Much more important and radically revolutionary is Kant’s reworking of the modal categories, which began with Hume. It is precisely Hume’s critique of causality that sets the paradigmatic way of thinking for modern mathematical science: it establishes the framework for probabilistic thinking and calculation. This is the core of the transcendental reversal.

Let us recall:

Causality is a fundamental concept dating back to Aristotle: If one thing exists, another will begin to exist after it – A implies B. Furthermore, Aristotle, and especially the tradition following him, thinks of the appearance of a given existent – its coming into being, its emergence – as the realization (actualization) of possibilities. Therefore, causality is a concept according to which the realization of one possibility necessarily leads to the realization of another. Causality imposes strict necessity on existence as the realization of possibilities: possibilities are actualized by necessity.

What Kant does, and before him Hume, but Kant terminologizes, is to remove existence from the realm of strict necessity. And this happens as Kant splits the table of the six categories into two: his modal categories are now grouped in threes. Because Kant separates possibility, impossibility, and necessity and sets them aside: between these three categories, he discovers an autonomous logical correlation – impossibility is the boundary of possibilities, which determines their (only formal) necessity. On the other hand, existence (reality and non-reality) is detached from possibility and placed on the other side: on the side of chance. This is the logic of the die. The die has six sides, these are six possibilities, and there is no seventh side, and it is impossible for there to be a seventh; therefore, it is necessary for one of the six to come up. Existence is inscribed in necessity, but only insofar as necessity is the framework for the possible. However, existence or reality is separated from possibility—from any specific possibility – and the specific possibility is realized only by chance. Knowing the boundary of possibilities, we can calculate in advance the probability of a given possibility occurring (1/6), but we can never calculate in advance which possibility will actually occur. Because existence is detached from possibility – it is a matter of chance, it is an event, and it is random. And the only boundary of chance is impossibility, which formally frames it and returns it to the realm of possibilities without determining the realization of any specific possibility. The possibilities are only generally framed, but their actuality or non-actuality is a matter of chance.

The separation of possibility from existence is the core of the transcendental turn. Through it, existence is freed from direct determination – it is determined only indirectly, from the framework of the possible, but not as a direct realization of possibilities. This reworking of the modal categories, according to which possibility, impossibility, and necessity are kept on one side, and reality, non-reality, and chance on the other – without “mixing” them, in order to maintain the rigor of probabilistic calculation – sets the paradigmatic framework of modern mathematical science: this is the algorithm of the 20th century, and it remains dominant today.

Indeed, even Kant in the second Critique admits causality from freedom, and this causality transcends the strict distinction between possibility and existence (because freedom implies that the impossible can and does become not just possible, but actual) and which is unknowable. After Kant, as is well known, Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel start from the idea of freedom and break down Kant’s strict demarcations between possible/impossible and knowable/unknowable. They once again implant freedom, but not in possibility, rather in necessity – turning freedom into an absolute subject and thus, unintentionally, sacrificing it by reintroducing the heavy determinism of the pre-Kantian dogmatic metaphysics.

Boyan Manchev also seeks to overcome the divide between possibility and existence – to rehabilitate freedom, not just as a regulative, but as an ontological concept – but he follows a different path. He explicitly formulates something like his own imperative – I call it “the imperative of Boyan Manchev”: “We must be careful not to make the reduction that has been made for centuries with respect to Aristotle’s dynamis, namely, to think of the possible in opposition to the real and as non-real” (p. 402). Boyan Manchev invests actuality – energy, freedom – not in necessity, nor in an absolute subject as the German idealists did, but in the possible – in the concrete possibility, which is not simply a reductive abstraction but always singular (i.e., real). Thus, freedom becomes ubiquitous – it is always already permeated into every possibility, which means – and into every reality. And insofar as it is a force transcending and transforming reality/possibility, it is always “more than reality.”

If Kant’s concept of freedom is anthropomorphic, then ubiquitous freedom cannot remain so. Manchev provides a detailed analysis of the works of Kant’s disciple and heretical critic Solomon Maimon – a separate book within the book (chapters 4 – 5). He shows how Maimon tries to break through the epistemological limitations in Kant’s understanding of experience by demonstrating that the thingin-itself is not just a regulative idea, an unknowable noumenon, but that, in order for there to be experience at all, it must have direct constitutive power. In other words, Maimon deliberately and conceptually justifies blending the formal and material aspects of experience, which Kant attempts to separate, in order to return its “dynamic magma” to the realm of possible experience. In fact, it is through the reworking of Maimon, Nietzsche, and Bergson (as well as Hume, Leibniz, and Spinoza) that Gilles Deleuze transforms Kant’s transcendental epistemology into ontology: into “transcendental empiricism,” where “the goal of philosophy is not to grasp the conditions of knowledge, but to discover and mobilize the conditions for creative production” (p. 309).

The return through Deleuze to Maimon in Manchev’s work has another meaning: it shows how freedom can enter experience not through the acting or knowing subject, not through the human, but through the things themselves. In other words, freedom is fully de-anthropomorphized. It is an immanent force of the world: “Freedom is the force of the self-overcoming of the world. Freedom is not internal otherness, but the force that makes the world world through its own surpassing. Thus, the transcendental will be understood as the force of the world’s self-overcoming, coming from the world itself. In other words, transcendental idealism will be grasped as super-realism: as hyper-critical realism.” (p. 598)

The new ontology that Manchev develops through and beyond Kant – his modal ontology – is based on a fundamental axiom: “The existence of freedom: existence as freedom.” (p. 598)

Finally, I would like to pose an open general question. I agree that Kant’s epistemological program should not be read rigidly but should be overcome toward a dynamic ontology that recognizes the emergence and transformability of the world, investing creativity and freedom in it not only on an anthropomorphic but also on a fundamental ontological level. Still, could it be that the mathematical probabilistic thinking, whose conceptual apparatus was developed by Hume and Kant, should not only be preserved but also further developed as a specific mode of maximally impartial investigation of inert processes and, consequently, for their practical prediction? In other words, is the paradigm of probabilistic thinking not complementary to the paradigm of freedom and transformability? My point is that, here—as in many other instances—there is no significant ontological difference, but only practical differences between the modes of interaction with the world, different ethoses?

REFERENCES

MANCHEV, B., 2023. World and Freedom: Transcendental Philosophy and Modal Ontology. Sofia: New Bulgarian University Publishing.

2025 година
Книжка 3
IRRITABILITY (NEED) AND AN-IRRITABILITY (FATIGUE): A DISORDER OF RHYTHMS – THE ONTOLOGICAL BURNOUT

Eort, Resistance, Action-Reaction, Sense of Life, Death, Habit

Книжка 2s
INTRODUCTION

Ivan Christov

Книжка 2
THE PROBLEM OF RELIGIOUS DIVERSITY: A PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH

BACHEV, M., 2024. Unity and Diversity of the Spirit: The Problem of Religious Pluralism. Sofia, Propeller, ISBN: 978-954-392-769-8, 346 p. Nikolai Mihailov

Книжка 1
КОМУНИКАЦИЯ И ФИЛОСОФИЯ

Проф. д.ф.н. Владимир Градев

SCIENCE. DISCOURSES. ROLES

Svetlana Alexandrova

2024 година
Книжка 4s
ФИЛОСОФИЯТА НА НЪДЖА, ИЛИ ЗАЩО ЛИБЕРАЛНАТА ДЪРЖАВА ИМА НУЖДА ОТ ДЪРВЕНО ЖЕЛЯЗО

Проф. д.п.н. Татяна Томова, доц. д-р Елена Калфова, доц. д-р Симeoн Петров

ЕКОЛОГИЧНОТО МЪЛЧАНИЕ: ПРОИЗВЕЖДАНЕ НА ЗЕЛЕНИ ПОЛИТИКИ ИЗВЪН ЕКОЛОГИЧНИЯ ДИСКУРС

Доц. д-р Борис Попиванов, д-р Димитър Ганев, д-р Димитра Воева, д-р Емил Марков

INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOUR AS A COMMUNITY RESILIENCE FACTOR: LESSONS FOR POLICY MAKING

Prof. Sonya Karabeliova, Assoc. Prof. Elena Kalfova, Yonko Bushnyashki

AFFECTIVE COMMITMENT: A MEDIATOR BETWEEN PERSONALITY TRAITS AND PRO-ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOUR

Assist. Prof. Velina Hristova Assoc. Prof. Kaloyan Haralampiev Prof. Ivo Vlaev

ЕКОТРЕВОЖНОСТ И ПЕРЦЕПЦИЯ ЗА КЛИМАТИЧНИТЕ ПРОМЕНИ

Доц. д-р Светлина Колева, проф. д.пс.н. Снежана Илиева, доц. д-р Калоян Харалампиев, проф. д.пс.н. Соня Карабельова

ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКИ АСПЕКТИ НА ПРОЕКОЛОГИЧНОТО ПОВЕДЕНИЕ

Гл. ас. д-р Радина Стоянова, докторант Мария Рац, изследовател Йонко Бушняшки

Книжка 4
ОНТОЛОГИЯ NON FINITO

Доц. д-р Васил Видински

Книжка 3s
TROLLING AS POLITICAL DISCOURSE

Chief Assist. Prof. Silvia Petrova

THE WILD WEST OF DIGITAL JOURNALISM

Prof. Nelly Ognyanova, DSc.

Книжка 3
PHILOSOPHY OF MEDICINE

Assoc. Prof. Julia Vasseva-Dikova

THE ROLE OF AI FOR TEACHING ANATOMY IN MEDICINE

Assist. Prof. Dr. Nikola Pirovski

ENGAGEMENT AND WORK-LIFE BALANCE IN ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT

Assoc. Prof. Vihra Naydenova Assist. Prof. Viktoriya Nedeva-Atanasova Assoc. Prof. Kaloyan Haralampiev, Assist. Prof. Antoaneta Getova

Книжка 2
THE YEAR OF KANT

Prof. Valentin Kanawrow, DSc.

Книжка 1
PHILOSOPHY OF SHARED SOCIETY

Assoc. Prof. Albena Taneva, Assoc. Prof. Kaloyan Simeonov, Assist. Prof. Vanya Kashukeeva-Nusheva, Assist. Prof. Denitsa Hinkova Melanie Hussak

2023 година
Книжка 4
ЗА БЪЛГАРСКАТА ФИЛОСОФСКА КУЛТУРА

Атанас Стаматов. „За българската философска култура“, 2023.

БОГ С МАШИНА

Николчина, Миглена. Бог с машина: Изваждане на човека. София: ВС Пъблишинг, 2022, 600 с.

Книжка 3s
FOREWORD

The conceptualization of the project “REFORM – Rethinking Bulgarian Education FOR the 21st Century: Concepts, Methodologies, Practices, and Players” (2021 – 2023) started in the midst of the Covid pandemics in 2020 and followed the introduction of online education from a distance (ORES) in Bulgarian schools. At present, three years later, ORES is applied only to individual and specific cases. Nevertheless, the ORES experience has irrevocably enriched the armory of teaching

PARADIGM SHIFTS IN COGNITION

Nevena Ivanova, PhD

COVID-19 AND THE SHIFT IN THE CONCEPT OF EDUCATION

Hristina Ambareva, Assoc. Prof.

AN INNOVATIVE SCHOOL FOR SUCCESSFUL AND HAPPY CHILDREN

Mariana Pencheva Silviya Pencheva, Assist. Prof., PhD

KNOWLEDGE IN THE EDUCATIONAL CONTEXT: SOCIAL DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICS

Albena Nakova, Assoc. Prof. Prof. Valentina Milenkova, DSc.

Книжка 3
DIGITAL MEDIA AND DYNAMICS OF CONTEMPORARY PUBLIC SPHERE: TOWARDS A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

Prof. Dr. Vesselina Valkanova, Prof. Dr. Nikolai Mihailov

НУЧО ОРДИНЕ

Vir Bonus et Sapiens

Книжка 2
ТРАНСЦЕНДЕНТАЛНИЯТ ВХОД В ПОСТГЛОБАЛНОТО

Проф. д.ф.н. Валентин Канавров

SOCIO-CULTURAL NATURE OF THE INFODEMIC AND ITS APPEARANCES UNDER GLOBAL TURBULENCE

Prof. Dr. Yurii Kalynovskyi Assoc. Prof. Vasyl Krotiuk, PhD Assoc. Prof. Olga Savchenko, PhD Roman Zorkin

ЕТИЧНИ И ПРАВНИ ПРОБЛЕМИ, СВЪРЗАНИ СЪС СУБЕКТНОСТТА И ИЗКУСТВЕНИЯ ИНТЕЛЕКТ

Доц. д-р Веселина Славова Доц. д-р Дарина Димитрова

IRRITABILITY (NEED) AND AN-IRRITABILITY (FATIGUE): A DISORDER OF RHYTHMS – THE ONTOLOGICAL BURNOUT

Part A: Excessive Irritability: A disorder of (bio)-rhythms – need, satisfaction of need, fatigue

ЕМБЛЕМАТИЧЕН ФИЛОСОФСКИ ВИПУСК НА СОФИЙСКИЯ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ НА 40 ГОДИНИ

Философи 1981. 40 години по-късно. Продължаващи истории (Юбилеен сборник) Съставители: Анета Тушева, Атанас Пашалиев, Валентин Канавров, Красимир Грудев, Таня Желязкова-Тея, Татяна Дронзина, Цветан Давидков. 2021. София: изд. „Стилует“, 318 с., ISBN 978-619-194-068-4

Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ ЧИТАТЕЛИ,

Многобройните измерения на рисковото общество, отбелязвани от съвременни мислители като Улрих Бек и Антъни Гидънс, днес се раз- ширяват и ускоряват. Живеем във време, в което кризите не просто се редуват, а се застъпват и изострят до краен предел. Тази ситуация носи риск и за философията. От една страна, рискът е заложен от склон- ността на индивидите днес да дават преимущество на фактите пред критическото им осмисляне. От друга страна, обучението по филосо- фия, както и по соц

ТОЛЕРАНТНОСТТА НА СТУДЕНТИТЕ В КОНТЕКСТА НА ОСНОВНИ ДЕМОКРАТИЧНИ ЦЕННОСТИ

Доц. д-р Блага Благоева Доц. д-р Стоянка Георгиева

2022 година
Книжка 4
ЕПОХЕ  И РЕДУКЦИЯ ВЪВ ФЕНОМЕНОЛОГИЯТА НА ХУСЕРЛ

Д-р Десислав Георгиев, д-р Деница Ненчева

Книжка 3
ОНТОЛОГИЧНИЯТ ИЗБОР НА ФИЛОСОФА

Проф. д-р Иван Камбуров

SOME ASPECTS OF THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SHAME AND GUILT

Ina Todoreeva Prof. Dr. Ivanka Asenova

Книжка 2
НОВАТА ПАРАДИГМА В МЕДИЦИНАТА

Доц. д-р Юлия Васева-Дикова

Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ ЧИТАТЕЛИ,

През последните две години светът, в който живеем, критично се промени. Вълни на пан- демията от COVID-19 избухваха и затихваха, въвеждаха се и се отменяха ограничаващи сво- бодата ни мерки, виртуално и материално се оплитаха в сложна екзистенциална амалгама, принуждавайки ни да усвояваме нови модели на поведение и да променяме радикално установе- ните световъзприятия. Липсата на устойчивост, яснота и предсказуемост трайно навлезе в живо- та ни. Мислите ни се фокуси

THE IMAGE OF THE OTHER IN THE CULTURAL PRACTICES OF THE MODERNITY

Prof. Dr. Serhii Vytkalov , Dr. Lesia Smyrna , Prof. Dr. Iryna Petrova , Prof. Dr. Adriana Skoryk , Prof. Dr. Olena Goncharova

RICŒUR AND FOUCAULT ON TRAGEDY AND TRUTH

Carlos Gardu•o Compar†n

THE CHOICE OF LOVE AND THE NUMINOUS: EXISTENTIAL AND GENDER CONTEXTS

Prof. Dr. Nazip Khamitov , Prof. Dr. Svitlana Krylova , Olena Romanova

2021 година
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
EXISTENTIAL FUNCTIONS OF MENTALIZATION IN ASIAN CIVILIZATIONS

Prof. DSc. Ludmil Georgiev, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Maya Tcholakova

THE BAPTISM OF RELICS OF OLEG AND YAROPOLK: ETHICAL, THEOLOGICAL AND POLITICAL ASPECTS

Prof. Dr. Roman Dodonov, Prof. Dr. Vira Dodonova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Oleksandr Konotopenko

Книжка 2
WITTGENSTEIN ON OTHER MINDS

Dr. Kailashkanta Naik

FACETS OF THE HOSPITALITY PHILOSOPHY: FILOTEXNIA

Dr. Yevhenii Bortnykov, Assoc. Prof. , Prof. Roman Oleksenko, DSc. , Dr. Inna Chuieva, Assoc. Prof. , Dr. Olena Konoh, Assoc. Prof. , Andriy Konoh

АРТЕФАКТИ 1. ДЕФИНИЦИЯ

проф. д.ф.н. Сергей Герджиков

„ЗА ВСЯКО СЛЕДВАЩО ПОКОЛЕНИЕ ПРОБЛЕМЪТ С ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО Е НОВ“ (УАЙТХЕД)

Vesselin Petrov (2020). Elements of Contemporary Process Philosophical Theory of Education and Learning. Les ‚ditions Chromatika: Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgique, ISBN 978-2-930517-70-4

Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ ЧИТАТЕЛИ,

Отминалата година наистина се оказа, както очаквахме, година на опасения и надежди, на изпитания и постижения, на тревоги и предиз- викателства. Пандемията не само не затихна, а се разрази още по-мащабно, по-яростно и по- застрашително. Начинът, по който обичайно функционираха всички обществени системи, се промени изцяло, а животът в добре познатия ни ритъм и форма почти изчезна. Спасителните от- крития на фармацевтичната наука дадоха надеж- ди, но породиха и

ПРОЦЕСУАЛНАТА ФИЛОСОФИЯ ЗА СЪЩНОСТТА И БЪДЕЩЕТО НА ОБРАЗОВАНИЕТО

Vesselin Petrov (2020). Elements of Contemporary Process Philosophical Theory of Education and Learning. Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgique: Les ‚ditions Chromatika, ISBN 978-2-930517-70-4

НОВАТА МОНОГРАФИЯ НА ПРОФ. НИКОЛАЙ МИЛКОВ – ЕДИН ЗАБЕЛЕЖИТЕЛЕН ИЗСЛЕДОВАТЕЛСКИ ПОХВАТ

Nikolay Milkov (2020). Early Analytic Philosophy and the German Philosophical Tradition. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 296/295 p., ISBN10: 1350086436; ISBN13: 9781350086432

2020 година
Книжка 4
TRUTH IN LEGAL NORMS

Boyan Bahanov

Книжка 3
REVIEW OF GUNNAR SKIRBEKK’S “CRISIS AND CO-RESPONSIBILITY. SHORT POLITICAL WRITINGS”

Gunnar Skirbekk (2016). Krise og medansvar. Politiske Sm‹skrifter (Crisis and Co-responsibility. Short Political Writings). Oslo: Res Publica. ISBN 978-82-8226-045-9. 272 p.

НОВА КНИГА ЗА ЕМПИРИЧНОТО ПСИХОЛОГИЧНО ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕ

Стоянов, В. (2020) Емпиричното психологично изследване: количествен срещу качествен подход. Варна: СТЕНО. ISBN 978-619-241-087-2, 185 с.

Книжка 2
ПСИХОСОЦИАЛНИ И МЕДИЦИНСКИ АСПЕКТИ ПРИ ПРОСЛЕДЯВАНЕ НА СЛУЧАЙ С LUES – НОРМИ, ЗАБРАНИ И ПРЕДРАЗСЪДЪЦИ

Милена Димитрова, Росица Дойновска, Данчо Дилков, Траянка Григорова, Галина Димитрова

НОВА КОНЦЕПТУАЛНА И СИСТЕМАТИЧНА ТРАНСЦЕНДЕНТАЛНА АНТРОПОЛОГИЯ

Канавров, В. (2020). Трансценденталният път към човека. София: Изток-Запад, ISBN 978-619-01-0572-5, 512 с. Формат 16/70/100, 32 печатни коли

Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ ЧИТАТЕЛИ,

Можем да определим и отминалата 2019 г. като изключително успешна в намеренията ни да превърнем списание „Философия“ в авто- ритетно международно издание. Присъстви- ето му в едни от най-престижните световни информационни бази го направи популярно и привлекателно за автори от целия свят. В ре- дакцията ни продължиха да се получават ръ- кописи от близки и далечни страни. Така през последните години тематичното съдържание на списанието постоянно се разнообразява- ше, а гео

PHILOSOPHY AND LIFE SCIENCES IN DIALOGUE

(2019). Philosophy and Life Sciences in Dialogue. Theoretical and Practical Questions. Proceedings of the IV. International Summer School Bioethics in Con- text; edited by Thomas Sören Hoffmann and Valentina Kaneva.

НОВАТА МОНОГРАФИЯ НА ВЕСЕЛИН ПЕТРОВ ВЪРХУ УАЙТХЕД

Petrov, V. (2019). Aspects of Whitehead’s Philosophy of Organism. Louvain-la- Neuve, Belgique: Les ‚ditions Chromatika. ISBN 978-2-930517-62-9, 154 p.

FREGE IN TWO DIMENSIONS

Lozev, K. (2019). A Review of "In the Eve, or the Other Revolution: Gottlob Frege". Blagoevgrad: BON. ISBN 978-954-395-228-1, 228 p.

2019 година
Книжка 4
KANT’S SYSTEM OF JUDGMENTS

Silviya Kristeva

ДРЕВНОИНДИЙСКИЯТ ФИЛОСОФ БХАРТРИХАРИ ЗА ПЪРВИ ПЪТ НА БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕЗИК

За изреченията и думите (Вакяпадия) на Бхартрихари Първа част Брахмаканда (Превод на български език, терминологичен речник и въведение Мирена Пацева)

НАУЧНО СПИСАНИЕ ФИЛОСОФИЯ BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL EDUCATION ГОДИНА XXVIII / VOLUME 28, 2019 ГОДИШНО СЪДЪРЖАНИЕ / ANNUAL CONTENTS СТРАНИЦИ / PAGES КНИЖКА 1 / NUMBER 1: 1 – 112 КНИЖКА 2 / NUMBER 2: 113 – 224 КНИЖКА 3 / NUMBER 3: 225 – 336 КНИЖКА 4 / NUMBER 4: 337 – 448

BOOK REVIEWS / НОВИ ЗАГЛАВИЯ 99 – 103: За две нови монографии на Нонка Богомилова [For Nonka Bogomilova’s Two New Monographs] / Иванка Стъпова / Ivanka Stapova 104 – 105: Truth and Meaning. Categories of Logical Analysis of Language by Todor Polimenov / Kamen Lozev 208 – 212: Отзив за книгата на Андрей Лешков – „Ауратично и театрично“ (Основни светогледни тематизми на модерното естетическо мислене) [Review about Andrei Leshkov’s Monography – “Auratical and Theatrical”

Книжка 3
КАНТ ИЛИ КАНТ(ОР)

Валентин Аспарухов

A MONOGRAPH IN THE FIELD OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC

Kristeva, S. (2018). Genesis and Field of Logical Theory. Studies in Philosophical Logic. Sofia: Faber

Книжка 2
ПСИХОСОЦИАЛНИ АСПЕКТИ НА РЕАКЦИЯТА НА СКРЪБ У МАЙКАТА СЛЕД НЕУСПЕШНА АСИСТИРАНА РЕПРОДУКЦИЯ

Милена Димитрова, Данчо Дилков, Галина Димитрова, Стоян Везенков, Росица Дойновска

ОТЗИВ ЗА КНИГАТА НА АНДРЕЙ ЛЕШКОВ – „АУРАТИЧНО И ТЕАТРИЧНО“ (ОСНОВНИ СВЕТОГЛЕДНИ ТЕМАТИЗМИ НА МОДЕРНОТО ЕСТЕТИЧЕСКО МИСЛЕНЕ)

Лешков, А. (2018). Ауратично и театрично. (Основни светогледни тематизми на модерното естетическо мислене). София: ОМДА. ISBN 978-954-9719-98-7

Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ ЧИТАТЕЛИ,

И през изминалата 2018 г. редакционната ни колегия продължи да търси възможности и да постига успехи в главната си амбиция да утвърди списание „Философия“ като автори- тетно международно научно и методическо издание, публикуващо качествени текстове от областта на философията и нейното препода- ване. Така любимото ни списание беше вклю- чено и в още една изключително престижна световноизвестна база от данни с научна ин- формация. В своето писмо до нас редакторът д-

ЗА ДВЕ НОВИ МОНОГРАФИИ НА НОНКА БОГОМИЛОВА

Богомилова, Н. (2018). Религията днес: между Theos и Anthropos. София: Парадигма. ISBN: 978-954-326-351-6 Богомилова, Н. (2018). (Не) Човешкото: литературно-философски ракурси. София: Парадигма. ISBN: 978-954-326-365-3

TRUTH AND MEANING. CATEGORIES OF LOGICAL ANALYSIS OF LANGUAGE BY TODOR POLIMENOV

Polimenov, T. (2018). Truth and Meaning. Categories of Logical Analysis

2018 година
Книжка 4
ФИЛОСОФИЯ НАУЧНО СПИСАНИЕ BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL EDUCATION ГОДИНА XXVII / VOLUME 27, 2018 ГОДИШНО СЪДЪРЖАНИЕ / ANNUAL CONTENTS

СТРАНИЦИ / PAGES КНИЖКА 1 / NUMBER 1: 1 – 120 КНИЖКА 2 / NUMBER 2: 121 – 224 КНИЖКА 3 / NUMBER 3: 225 – 336 КНИЖКА 4 / NUMBER 4: 337 – 456

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ ЧИТАТЕЛИ,

През октомври 2016 г. компанията Clarivate Analytics откупува цялата интелектуална соб- ственост и търговските дейности, свързани с науката, на световноизвестния медиен гигант Thomson Reuters. Сред най-ценните продукти на тази придобивка е Web of Science – прес- тижната световна система за анализ и оцен- ка на въздействието на научните публикации в глобален план. Амбицията на Clarivate е да превърне Web of Science в още по-ефектив- на платформа, чрез която да се стимулир

БОЛКАТА КАТО РАЗБУЛВАНЕ

Лазар Копринаров

В ОБУВКИТЕ НА ДЕТЕ

Христо Симеонов

2017 година
Книжка 4
SHERRY BY ELIANE LIMA

(USA, 24 m. 2017)

ФИЛОСОФИЯ НАУЧНО СПИСАНИЕ BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL EDUCATION ГОДИНА XXVI / VOLUME 26, 2017 ГОДИШНО СЪДЪРЖАНИЕ / ANNUAL CONTENTS

СТРАНИЦИ / PAGES КНИЖКА 1 / NUMBER 1: 1 – 120 КНИЖКА 2 / NUMBER 2: 121 – 240 КНИЖКА 3 / NUMBER 3: 241 – 352 КНИЖКА 4 / NUMBER 4: 353 – 480

Книжка 3
ВОЛЯ ЗА САМОТА

Жан Либи

Книжка 2
МЕТАКРИТИКА

Йохан Георг Хаман

Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ ЧИТАТЕЛИ,

През миналата година списание „Фило- софия“ навърши 25 години – четвърт век не просто присъствие в съвременната културна среда, а активно участие в опознаването на непредсказуемо развиващия се свят, в сътво- ряването на смисъл и отстояването на свето- гледни принципи. Стотиците наши автори и хилядите ни читатели се превърнаха в устой- чива общност от съмишленици, които активно общуваха помежду си чрез страниците на лю- бимото ни списание в търсене на ценн

2016 година
Книжка 4
АВТОНОМИЯ И МОРАЛ

Веселина Славова

Книжка 3
МОРAЛНАТА ИДЕНТИЧНОСТ

Димитър Богданов

Книжка 2
ТРАНСЦЕНДЕНТАЛНОТО СЪЗНАНИЕ VERSUS ФЕНОМЕНОЛОГИЧНОТО НЕСЪЗНАВАНО

(Национална конференция по случай 160 години от рождението на Зигмунд Фройд)

ТЕМАТИЗАЦИИТЕ НА ДРУГОСТТА В БИОГРАФИЧНИЯ ПРОЕКТ – ОТ СРЕЩИТЕ В ЕЖЕДНЕВИЕТО ДО СБЛЪСЪКА СЪС СМЪРТТА

Градев, Д., Маринов, А., Карабельова, С. и др. (2015). Другите в биографията на личността. София: УИ „Св. Климент Охридски“, 2015, ISBN: 9789540740324, с. 256.

Книжка 1
УВАЖАЕМИ ЧИТАТЕЛИ,

Измина още една година, през която заедно търсихме отговорите на сложни философски въпроси, съпреживявахме съмненията и тре- петите на нашите нови и на познати автори, споделяхме техните умозаключения или опо- нирахме на изводите им и така взаимно обо- гатявахме знанията си. Увеличеният тираж и разнообразната тематика на публикуваните текстове повишиха значително интереса към списанието, което е видно и от удвоения брой абонати. През изтеклата година п

ТОПИКА НА АПРИОРНОТО

Силвия Кръстева

2015 година
Книжка 4
Книжка 3
ИЗБОР И СВОБОДА

Ангел С. Стефанов

ИЗБОРЪТ НА НОВИЯ HOMO CREABILIS

Таня Желязкова – Тея

Книжка 2
НИКОЛАЙ ХАРТМАН И ПЪТЯТ СЛЕД ПОСТМОДЕРНИЗМА

Димитър Цацов „Забравеният“ философ. Традициите на презентацио- низма и приносът на Николай Хартман. София, Изд. „Пропелер“, 2014 г., ISBN 978-954-392-282-6, 186 с.

Книжка 1
ЕРОСЪТ И ВЪЗВИШЕНОТО

Невена Крумова

МОДА И ВРЕМЕ

(към една антропология на обличането)

ФИЛОСОФИЯ НА ФИЛМА

Томас Вартенберг

DYING AND DEATH IN 18

Olga Gradinaru

ЗА ФРЕНСКАТА ФИЛОСОФИЯ В БЪЛГАРИЯ

Нина Димитрова Появилата се наскоро антология Френската философия в българската фи- лософска култура успешно изпълнява амбициозната задача да издири мно- жеството свидетелства – статии, студии и монографии, за присъствието на френското културно влияние у нас в един значителен исторически период – от Възраждането до наши дни. Самото възвестяване на тази задача впечатля- ва. Доколкото също притежавам немалък опит в „ровенето“ на пръснатите по хуманитарната ни книжнина текстов

2014 година
Книжка 4
БЪЛГАРСКИЯТ ZEITGEIST

Камелия Жабилова

Книжка 3
МАРКС ПИШЕ ПИСМО ДО МАРКС

Райнхард Маркс Биографични данни за автора: Кардинал Райнхард Маркс (Reinhard Marx) е роден през 1953 г. в Ге-

ПРОЕКТ E-MEDIEVALIA

Татяна Славова

Книжка 2
СЪДЪРЖАНИЕ И РЕАЛНОСТ

Станислав Пандин

Книжка 1
2013 година
Книжка 4
ПРОПОЗИЦИОНАЛНИ ВЪПРОСИ

Светла Йорданова

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
СЪЗНАНИЕ И ВРЕМЕ

Александър Андонов

„ВЪЗПЯВАМ ЕЛЕКТРИЧЕСКОТО ТЯЛО“

Анета Карагеоргиева

Книжка 1
ПАРМЕНИД И МИТЪТ ЗА ФАЕТОН

Георги Апостолов

IBN SINA – GREAT ISLAMIC THINKER

Tursun Gabitov, Maral Botaeva

ДЗЕН – ПЪТЯТ НА ХАРМОНИЯТА

Светлин Одаджиев

ПРИСЪДА И СЪДБА

Стоян Асенов

2012 година
Книжка 4
ИДЕЯТА НА КСЕНОФАН ЗА ЕДИННОТО

Станислава Миленкова

ФИЛОСОФИЯ

EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL

Книжка 3
Книжка 2
Книжка 1
ФИЛОСОФЪТ НА КЛАСИКАТА

Борис Борисов Поводът за настоящия текст е новата книга на проф. д.ф.н. Валентин Ка- навров, озаглавена „Пътища на метафизиката. Кант и Хайдегер“ . Тя пред- ставлява финалната трета част от теоретичната трилогия на проф. Канавров, включваща още двете поредни монографии „Критическата метафизика на Кант. Опит за виртуалистки трансцендентализъм“ и „Критически онтологеми на духовността“. Ще поставя началото на рецензията с няколко думи за личността на авто- ра, доколкото дори най-абстра

©2005 Национално Издателство Аз-Буки ООД. Всички права запазени.